Misplaced Pages

Physical determinism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:56, 26 January 2013 editBrews ohare (talk | contribs)47,831 edits Popper's three worlds: reword← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:30, 3 February 2017 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,299 edits Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Physical determinism closed as redirect to Determinism#Varieties 
(110 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ] {{R from related topic}}
'''Physical determinism''' is a position in ] that holds that a complete description of the ''physical'' state of the world at any given time and a complete statement of the ''physical'' laws of nature together entail every truth as to what ''physical'' events happen after that time.<ref name=Ginet/>

This statement leaves open just what "physical" might mean, or a "complete" description. This vagueness is reflected in its usage. So, for example, one could take ''physical determinism'' as {{quote|"a concept only relevant to the mathematical models of physics and other physical sciences, although its relevance to the world of everyday choice and action is questionable...if thoughts, feelings, and desires are not physical events, it is unlikely that physical theories are appropriate models for thinking about such nonphysical events.<ref name=Bishop/>|Robert C. Bishop |Chaos, indeterminism, and free will, p. 84}}

==Causal completeness==
The scope of physical determinism is related to the question of the ''causal completeness'' of science, the idea that every event falls within the domain of scientific explanation. If causal completeness does not apply to the universe, then the door is open to events that are not subject to physical determinism.<ref name=Atmanspacher/> A common view of mental events is that they are an ] only correlated with neurological activity, and without causal impact. However, a failure of physical determinism would allow room for their causal significance.

A more general formulation of physical determinism skirts the issue of causal completeness. It is based upon connections between 'events' supplied by a theory:
{{quote| "a theory is deterministic if, and only if, given its state variables for some initial period, the theory logically determines a unique set of values for those variables for any other period."<ref name=Nagel/>|Ernest Nagel|''Alternative descriptions of physical state'' p. 292 }}
This quote replaces the idea of 'cause-and-effect' with that of 'logical implication' according to one or another theory that connects events. In addition, an 'event' is related by the theory itself to formalized ''states'' described using the parameters defined by that theory. Thus, the details of interpretation are placed where they belong, fitted to the context in which the chosen theory applies. Using the definition of physical determinism above, the limitations of a theory to some particular domain of experience also limits the associated definition of 'physical determinism' to that same domain. That limitation leaves open the question whether there is a physical "]".

==Popper's three worlds==
A much more general reservation about the applicability of physical determinism stems from the formulation of ]. Popper split the world into three categories:<ref name=Popper/>

* World 1: the world of physical ]s and ]s, including ] entities
* World 2: the world of ] objects and events, including conscious and subconscious experiences
* World 3: the world of products of the human mind, including art, science, and religion.

World 3 is a creation of the human imagination, and includes physical theory as a particular case. Accordingly, one could argue that physical determinism is a child of this process, and although it has its successes in World 1, it may not apply to World 3. The subjective aspects of World 3, which are not readily subsumed in the third-person perspective of science, are described in the article ].

==References==
{{reflist|refs=
<ref name=Atmanspacher>
{{cite book |author=Robert C Bishop, Harald Atmanspacher |chapter=Chapter 5: The causal closure of physics and free will |page=101 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Free Will: Second Edition |editor=Robert Kane, ed |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=4YUJhIiyMFoC&pg=PA101 |isbn=0195399692 |year=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=2nd}}
</ref>

<ref name=Bishop>
{{cite book |author=Robert C Bishop |chapter=Chapter 4: Chaos, indeterminism, and free will |page=84 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Free Will: Second Edition |editor=Robert Kane, ed |isbn=0195399692 |year=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=2nd |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=4YUJhIiyMFoC&pg=PA84}}
</ref>

<ref name=Ginet>
This definition is from {{cite book |title=On Action |author=Carl Ginet |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=mRns0NYdns0C&pg=PA92 |page=92 |isbn=052138818X |year=1990 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
</ref>

<ref name=Nagel>
{{cite book |title=The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation |author=Ernest Nagel |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=u6EycHgRfkQC&pg=PA285 |pages =285-292 |chapter=§V: Alternative descriptions of physical state |isbn=0915144719 |year=1999 |publisher=Hackett |edition=2nd }}
</ref>

<ref name=Popper>
{{cite web |title=Three Worlds|author=Karl Popper |date=April 7, 1978 |work=The Tanner lectures on human values |url=http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/popper80.pdf |publisher=The University of Utah |accessdate=2013-01-24}} The list of lectures is found in the .
</ref>
}}

Latest revision as of 09:30, 3 February 2017

Redirect to:

  • To a related topic: This is a redirect to an article about a similar topic.
    • Redirects from related topics are different than redirects from related words, because a related topic is more likely to warrant a full and detailed description in the target article. If this redirect's subject is notable, then also tag it with {{R with possibilities}} and {{R printworthy}}.