Revision as of 21:23, 6 February 2013 editTwinsMetsFan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users122,110 edits migrating assessment for NY university projects from WPUS to WPNY per discussion at WT:WPNY using AWB← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:31, 29 March 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,815,464 editsm Remove unknown param from WP New York (state): Cornell-importanceTag: AWB |
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|action1date=15:07, 20 May 2006 |
|
|action1date=15:07, 20 May 2006 |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
|topic=socsci |
|
|topic=socsci |
|
}}{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject New York|class=Start|importance=Low|Cornell=yes|Cornell-importance=Low}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Universities|class=Start}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
|
==Comments== |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities|importance=low}} |
|
I dont understand why this article would be considered for deletion. If you have any suggestions for how to make it better please post them here. ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Cornell=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Higher education}} |
|
:The biggest issue I would see for this article is the list of notable alumni. If you look at some of the pages regarding freemasonry, and its appendant/concordant bodies, we have tried to limit those lists to only a very few, specifically looking at those who are notable because of their membership, or their activities which relate to their membership in the group.--] (]) 18:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
== GA == |
|
|
|
{{to do}} |
|
|
|
|
I've remove the article from ] because it is more of a list than an article. If you want to, you can nominate it at ]. |
|
|
:I disagree with this. |
|
|
# The article was nominated in good faith. |
|
|
# It has been in the queue for a long time |
|
|
# It does not obviously ]. |
|
|
# In light of that, it should remain on queue until such time that an editor can evaluate the article fully in connection with the ] and render a decision in accordance with those criteria. |
|
|
Simply removing an article from the nomination queue for a reason that has not been established as a quick-fail criterion is irregular, which has a knock on effect on the trustworthiness of the Good Article nomination and evaluation process. I've made further remarks ]. ] has opened a ] page as well. Please join the discussion there. Thank you. ] (]) 17:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
=== GA Review of Sphinx Head === |
|
|
Following the discussion on the ], there is general agreement that a misunderstanding has taken place, that articles should depart from the nomination queue only after an evaluation has taken place and has been published on a subpage. I am undertaking that review now. Accordingly, I am taking the extraordinary steps of reverting ]'s edits to restore the {{tl|GA nominee}} template and establish a review page, which will be transcluded to this section here. Apologies to the editors awaiting an evaluation for so long now. Thank you for your patience. ] (]) 15:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's this group's connection to the Dartmouth College society with a similiar name? I suggest breaking the link between the two entires, unless someone knows something unreported in either entry. ] (]) 14:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)SLY111 |
|
|
{{Talk:Sphinx Head/GA1}} |
|