| Revision as of 23:33, 8 February 2013 editVanished user 19794758563875 (talk | contribs)17,339 edits →Evidence presented by KimvdLinde: Withdrawing per e-mail "request"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 15:07, 25 April 2013 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits courtesy blanking content of case sub-page, for the Arbitration Committee |
| (398 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Casenav|case name=Sexology|clerk1=Penwhale|clerk2=Ks0stm|draft arb=David Fuchs|draft arb2=|active=10|inactive=2|recused=1}} |
|
{{Casenav}} |
|
|
{{notice|Create your own section to provide evidence in, and '''do not edit anyone else's section'''. Please keep your evidence concise, and within the default limits. If you wish to exceed the default lengths, you must request the agreement of the arbitrators to do so on the /Evidence talk page before posting. Unapproved overlength evidence, or inappropriate material and/or diffs, may be refactored, redacted or removed entirely.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ombox |image=none |text= This page has been ]. The ]'s decision is still in effect, and can be viewed at ]. The contents of this page can be viewed in the .}} |
|
Any editor may add evidence to this page, irrespective of whether they are involved in the dispute. Create your own section and '''do not edit another editor's section'''. |
|
|
|
{{NOINDEX}} |
|
By default, the evidence submission length is limited to about 1000 words and about 100 ] for named parties; and about 500 words and about 50 diffs for non-party editors. While in general it is is more effective to make succinct yet detailed submissions, users who wish to submit over-length evidence may do so by posting a request on the /Evidence talk page. Unapproved overlong evidence may be trimmed to size or removed by the Clerk without warning. |
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on the issues that are important to the dispute and on diffs which illustrate the nature of the dispute. |
|
|
|
|
|
You ''must'' use the prescribed format in your evidence. Evidence should include a link to the actual page diff in question, or to a short page section; links to the page itself are insufficient. Never link to a ], an editor's contributions, or a ] for all actions of an editor (as those change over time), although a link to a log for a specific article or a specific block log can be useful. Please make sure any page section links are permanent; see ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
General discussion of the case will not be accepted on this page, and belongs on the ]. The Arbitration Committee expects that all rebuttals of other evidence submissions will be included '''in your own section''' and will explain how the evidence is incorrect. Please do not refactor the page or remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, only an Arbitrator or Clerk may move it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at ], which is open for comment by parties, Arbitrators, and others. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies, Arbitrators vote at ]. Only Arbitrators (and Clerks, when clarification on votes is needed) may edit the proposed decision page. |
|
|
|
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
== Evidence presented by James Cantor == |
|
|
{{User:HersfoldArbClerkBot/Length header|word=265|diff=13|link=33|wLimit=1000|dLimit=100|lLimit=2147483647}} |
|
|
|
|
|
===Evidence of off-wiki campaign influencing on-wiki events=== |
|
|
* ''NYTimes'' reporting on campaign of harassment by Jokestress against ]. |
|
|
* Jokestress’ Bailey-related target list. |
|
|
* Peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis of campaign, by bioethicist/historian. Coverage received a Guggenheim Award. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Evidence of chilling effect=== |
|
|
* Evidence of Jokestress' protracted conflicts with openly trans- Wikipedian, ]. |
|
|
* Jokestress’ updated target list, naming ]. |
|
|
* Jokestress’ most-wanted list (including Hfarmer), asking readers "If you have received an email, attachment or photo from someone using these names or IP addresses in 2004 or earlier, please forward it to me for analysis,” so that she could "vector and expose" them. |
|
|
* Example of results of off-wiki campaign against Hfarmer. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Evidence that Jokestress’ POV-pushing predates Cantor=== |
|
|
{| class="wikitable" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
! Year!! Example |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| 2004 || ] POV <br>] POV-pushing (and self-link cite)<br>Autogynephilia POV <br>Autogynephilia POV-pushing |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| 2005 || ] POV <br>] POV-pushing |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| 2006 || ] POV <br>] POV-pushing; sustained conflicts with the consensus on ] |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| 2007 || |
|
|
''NYTimes'' notes WP conflict on Bailey pages, already notable. |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| 2008 || |
|
|
Homosexual transsexual POV <br>Homosexual transsexual POV-pushing |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
Cantor joins WP in May, 2008; never edited before then. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Evidence that Jokestress’ distruptions occur without Cantor (2008+)=== |
|
|
* ANI Jokestress re homosexual transsexual etc. |
|
|
* ANI Archive438 |
|
|
* ANI Crusade |
|
|
* ANI Andrea James |
|
|
* ANI The faith and constructiveness of an editors edits in one subject area |
|
|
* COIN Jokestress |
|
|
* COIN Homosexual transsexual |
|
|
* RSN Guidance on pseudodymous authors |
|
|
* Requests for mediation/Rejected/40#Homosexual transsexual |
|
|
* Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-11-25 |
|
|
|
|
|
===Evidence of other POV-pushing=== |
|
|
* Adding links to her for-profit website (2004). |
|
|
* Removing links to business competitors' sites (2005, 2006). |
|
|
* Creating page about her business partner, ] (2005). |
|
|
* Disrupting DYN discussion w/ uninvolved editors to push anti-Cantor POV (2010). |
|
|
* Sustained/repeated counter-consensus additions of ] to ] (2008, 2010, 2012). |
|
|
|
|
|
== Evidence presented by Jokestress == |
|
|
{{User:HersfoldArbClerkBot/Length header|word=34|diff=0|link=0|wLimit=1000|dLimit=100|lLimit=2147483647}} |
|
|
|
|
|
===Background=== |
|
|
]'s a key figure in major ethical controversies in sexology. His edits promote himself/allies or denigrate critics. Cantor's alliance here owns relevant sexology articles, often hindering inclusion of competing conceptualizations and making personal attacks. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Evidence presented by {your user name}== |
|
|
''before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person'' |
|
|
==={Write your assertion here}=== |
|
|
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring. |
|
|
|
|
|
==={Write your assertion here}=== |
|
|
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks. |
|
