Misplaced Pages

Talk:Armenian National Congress (1917): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:25, 9 February 2013 editYerevantsi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,668 edits ←Created page with '{{Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Armenian_National_Congress_(1917)}}'  Latest revision as of 16:21, 25 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,305,410 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject Armenia}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(18 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Armenian_National_Congress_(1917)}} {{Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Armenian_National_Congress_(1917)}}
{{dyktalk|14 February|2013|entry=... that the ''']''' eventually proclaimed the independence of ] in 1918?}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Politics}}
{{WikiProject Armenia}}
}}

== Only Armenian views ==

This article, like several others on Armenian topics that I have observed, is told from a very unilateral POV, only the Armenian one. No info on Russian or neighbouring Caucasian nations' (basicly Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey but also Iran) is included. This attitude is harming WP. I added a POV tag. --] (]) 22:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
:What info do you expect to see in this article about Russia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Iran? --] ] 23:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
::Something unusual in Armenian-related articles: The position of others, in an NPOV manner. --] (]) 23:31, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
:::Again, what kind of info do you expect to see here? --] ] 23:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
::::If this organization was very influential and worth article on WP, then it is very surprising that ONLY Armenian sources wrote about it. If third-party reliable and verifiable sources are not provided in near future, this article has to be suggested for speedy deletion. Best, ] (]) 12:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
:::::And which POV-pushing troll are you a sock of, Mr IP? Let me guess...--] (]) 13:19, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
::::::Aw, come on, it's {{User|Konullu}}, isn't it? Who else tag-bombs Armenian articles with "POV" and "RefImprove" and signs his talk page comments "Best"? Who else loves to "speedy delete" articles he doesn't like? --] (]) 14:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

== End date ==
Do you know when this council ended (or dissolved, reorganized, etc.)? Best, ] (]) 23:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

== Refimprove ==
I put refimprove template due to the following non-verifiable and incomplete sources:
* 1, a b Ter-Minassian p.30;
* 3, a b Adalian p.76;
* Ter-Minassian p.30 for Old Style date;
* Hovannisian Republic, pp.16-17;
* Ter-Minassian pp.30-31;
* Hovannisian Republic, pp.17-18;
* Ter-Minassian pp.33-34;
* Ter-Minassian p.34

Best, ] (]) 19:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
:What the hell are you on about? Look in the bloody "Sources" section. Everybody knows this is really just about your blatant POV-pushing. --] (]) 21:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

:: ],
:: 1. POV and Refimprove templates are different. My aim is to improve references, I am not deleting, opposing, arguing, questioning anything.
:: 2. Sources section lists them, but the links are not provided and if we can provide verifiable sources (e.g. links to those researches, readable versions, etc.), let's provide them as well. Best, ] (]) 23:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

:::You're not trying to delete articles? ] ] (]) 23:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:21, 25 January 2024

A fact from Armenian National Congress (1917) appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Armenian National Congress (1917).
Misplaced Pages
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPolitics
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArmenia
WikiProject iconArmenian National Congress (1917) is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Only Armenian views

This article, like several others on Armenian topics that I have observed, is told from a very unilateral POV, only the Armenian one. No info on Russian or neighbouring Caucasian nations' (basicly Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey but also Iran) is included. This attitude is harming WP. I added a POV tag. --E4024 (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

What info do you expect to see in this article about Russia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Iran? --Երևանցի 23:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Something unusual in Armenian-related articles: The position of others, in an NPOV manner. --E4024 (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Again, what kind of info do you expect to see here? --Երևանցի 23:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
If this organization was very influential and worth article on WP, then it is very surprising that ONLY Armenian sources wrote about it. If third-party reliable and verifiable sources are not provided in near future, this article has to be suggested for speedy deletion. Best, 195.212.29.190 (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
And which POV-pushing troll are you a sock of, Mr IP? Let me guess...--Folantin (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Aw, come on, it's Konullu (talk · contribs), isn't it? Who else tag-bombs Armenian articles with "POV" and "RefImprove" and signs his talk page comments "Best"? Who else loves to "speedy delete" articles he doesn't like? --Folantin (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

End date

Do you know when this council ended (or dissolved, reorganized, etc.)? Best, 188.142.246.17 (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Refimprove

I put refimprove template due to the following non-verifiable and incomplete sources:

  • 1, a b Ter-Minassian p.30;
  • 3, a b Adalian p.76;
  • Ter-Minassian p.30 for Old Style date;
  • Hovannisian Republic, pp.16-17;
  • Ter-Minassian pp.30-31;
  • Hovannisian Republic, pp.17-18;
  • Ter-Minassian pp.33-34;
  • Ter-Minassian p.34

Best, Konullu (talk) 19:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

What the hell are you on about? Look in the bloody "Sources" section. Everybody knows this is really just about your blatant POV-pushing. --Folantin (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Folantin,
1. POV and Refimprove templates are different. My aim is to improve references, I am not deleting, opposing, arguing, questioning anything.
2. Sources section lists them, but the links are not provided and if we can provide verifiable sources (e.g. links to those researches, readable versions, etc.), let's provide them as well. Best, Konullu (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
You're not trying to delete articles? Then what is this? Proudbolsahye (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Categories: