Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rusted AutoParts: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:43, 12 February 2013 edit76.189.111.199 (talk) Your removal of a valid red link← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:30, 22 December 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,371,938 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Rusted AutoParts/Archives/2024/September. (BOT) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
''"All of civility depends on being able to contain the rage of individuals"'' - ].<br>(Please keep civil, no profanity and please sign your comment).
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Rusted AutoParts/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=2160|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
==Concern regarding ]==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== Sorry ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Oops, sorry about that. <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]


==Concern regarding ]==
Intelati has given you a ]! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <br />
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{tls|Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{tls|munch}}!
{{clear}}
</div>--]<sup>(])</sup> 23:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 05:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
== ClapBoy380 ==


== A barnstar for you ==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]| ]}}
JamesBWatson has eaten your cookie. The cookie made him ] and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{tl|cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. JamesBWatson also hopes that you weren't being too optimistic in using the word "finally". However, cookies can help to cheer us up even when socks are around. <br/>

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{tls|munch}}!
{{clear}}
</div>
<!-- Template:Munch -->
] (]) 19:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

== Reply ==

I'll give him more time. He's probably having a Wikibreak. He's not always quick to respond. And as for Mount Rushmore, good idea, I would have to include three more in the box though because I try to even it up. You have any thoughts for those three are I will be glad to hear it. − ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 18:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

{{Done}}. And also don't forget to check out the editing portion of the user page as well. − ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 18:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

== Advice ==

You're written a number of article stubs that require sourcing and inline citations to show notability. The film articles '']'' and '']'' look do-able. But a somewhat greater concern is the ] for ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. I would hate that they ended up at deletion discussion because they have not been improved. Care for some assistance? ''']''' '']'' 20:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

== Edit warring at Bob's Burgers ==

IP did it again. Feel free to move ahead with reporting. Keep me posted. I'm less experienced with reporting procedures and thanks for your input.] (]) 21:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

== Bob's Burgers misspells it's menu ==

Was just doing a moratorium on the most recent beat-down, and noticed I screwed up your initials a while back on the talk page. You'd think "RAP" would come more readily to mind than the acronym for the English's Royal Air Force in the 21st century. But perhaps that was just the form my PTSD took. Heat of battle, collateral damage, and ect. Maybe it seems silly, but apologies on my part. ]] 02:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

== Many Thanks for the Barnstar ==

My 4th. Wowee!!--] (]) 03:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

== Your UBX ==

I saw your request for a UBX. Anything particular you want the description to say? Thanks, <span style="border:1px solid #999;-moz-border-radius:2em">]]</span> 21:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
:I have done a little bit of research into the movie (as I have not seen it) and I can't figure out what "famous quote" you want, there seems to be a few. Sorry i can't be of more help here, <span style="border:1px solid #999;-moz-border-radius:2em">]]</span> 14:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
::Here it is ], it may need a bit of editing and changing as I have not seen the movie. <span style="border:1px solid #999;-moz-border-radius:2em">]]</span> 22:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

== Pirahna ==

I thought it was called Piranha 3DD or something? I don't mind helping where I can. ] (]) 15:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
::It's a problem on lots of pages, there are thousands of movies and only a handful of people to deal with them. That is particularly bad as it is a complete rundown of the entire film but unfortunately I haven't seen it so I don't know enough to say what is important and cut the rest. Least I don't remember seeing it, maybe as a kid but I don't remember anything about it. I try not to edit stuff I haven't seen so I don't remove stuff that is important. If you've seen it, feel free to layeth the smacketh down upon the article. ] (]) 15:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

== Total Recall (2012 film) DYK ==

What do you think about this new article being on the main page as a Did you know hook? :) ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 01:17, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

::Ok it might be best to wait for confirmed filming. But it is still important to know the dating of when you started the article. ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 15:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

:::In case you haven't figured it out. With the citation that you were adding. You just missed adding <nowiki> <ref> </ref> </nowiki> on the citation. ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 15:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

::::I think I will start nominate it as a DYK tomorrow. Don't make me forget it. :) ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 23:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

==Welcome to WikiProject Film==
<div style="border: 2px solid black; background: black; background-color:#CDFECD; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 90%">
<div style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">'''Welcome!'''</div>
]
Hey, welcome to ]! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{tl|User WikiProject Film}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
* Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's ]; it is highly recommended that you .

* The project has a ]. The newsletter for May has been ]. June's issue is ''currently in production''; it will be delivered as a link, but ] are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

* Want to jump right into editing? The ] show things you should include.
* Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the ] to see how you can help.
* Want to see some great film article examples? Head on over to the ].
* Want to know how good our articles are? Our ] has rated the quality of the majority of film article in Misplaced Pages. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask ], and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 05:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
</div>

==WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter==
The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the ]. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 04:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: white;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" | |rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''Death Star''' |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This '''Death Star''' award is given for all your hard work on the ] pages. ] (]) 09:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This is for your tireless contributions to ]. ] (]) 15:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
|} |}


== Fairy Tale ==
==WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter==
The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the ]. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 04:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


Thanks for getting in touch. Sure, yes makes sense. Best, G ] (]) 18:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
== Thanks ==


==Concern regarding ]==
Hi, thank you for being flexible with the method to remove redlinks at ]. The new arrangements seem to be working well. Regards, ] (]) 08:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 16:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0177 -->


==Concern regarding ]==
== 2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
Voting for WikiProject Film's '''October 2011 ] election''' has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to ''']''' by October 29! ] (] &#124; ]) 12:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0187 -->


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 00:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
== Expendables 2 ==


== Denys Graham ==
The cast section is as sourced as it can be now, I removed all rumoured names and weakly sourced ones, so if you see anyone adding the older stuff back without a good source, feel free to revert it. ] (]) 20:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
== Jump Street ==


Hi {{ping|Rusted AutoParts}}, I've restored ] to the ] page. Firstly, your assessment of the source "feeling a bit bloggy"... If you take a look at , it's abundantly clear that it's an organisation for professional actors: "Actors & Writers London (AWL) is London’s longest-running professional play-reading forum for actors and writers. It was established in 1973 at Hammersmith’s Riverside Studios and was known as Hammersmith Actors and Writers Group until July 2004." I can't see any evidence of it being a personal blog of any kind. Secondly, if you're unsure of a source and want to discuss it – and it's not one that has been previously ruled out – we have the talk section of Deaths in 2024 for that. Thanks ] (]) 20:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Well what needs doing? It looks fine. ] (]) 00:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
:Well I can't see anything wrong with it. MIght want to add it to the tv show's page though. ] (]) 00:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
::Thought you may like this, its the trailer for the film, actually made me interested in seeing it http://www.facebook.com/21JumpStreetMovie?sk=wall
:::You didn't like it? I've never seen the show but the trailer was pretty funny. ] (]) 00:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
::::Well yeah, if it is that different (I wouldn't know) they should call it something else because I doubt there are that many 21 Jump Street fans lying about that calling it that will attract a huge audience. But it still looked pretty funny, I'm loving the load of good comedies we've been getting lately.] (]) 01:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


==Concern regarding ]==
== Piece of advice ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
I don't think she's going to let up with the mocking and I'm feeling pretty disillusioned right now so I doubt that admins are going to do anything about it seeing as how you've been given warnings for incivility while her attitude has been left to ride. My advice? Step away from the whole mess for now. I know you're trying to patch things up so that the content can be worked on (anyone with a modicum of reading comprehension skills can see that). But I think it's going to (extremely unfairly) dig a hole for you instead of accomplishing your goal. Find some other pages to work on for now and let the Buffy pages ride. While there are some GAs and FAs in the bunch, a fair amount of them have been cruft for a long time now. A little while longer isn't going to hurt. But I think you have a lot to offer and don't want to see you get ridden out by overzealous admins who refuse to read the history that led to your (understandable) defensiveness. Am I making any sense? I'm pretty frelling angry at how all of this is shaking out so I may not be. ] (]) 13:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 03:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
:And for the record, I wouldn't have guessed you were only 17 from how you write in general around the site. I say this as a chick old enough to be your (very young) mother (I'm 35). If the conversation hadn't gotten so heated that I started checking editor talk pages to fill in the gaps, I'd never have had a clue. You come off much better than some of the supposed grown ups my age and older around here. So ignore all of the agist BS getting thrown your way; it's totally unwarranted. ] (]) 13:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
==Your draft article, ]==
Ditto. While I think you originally handled this in a suboptimal manner and I wish you hadn't risen to the bait thrown at you, you certainly didn't deserve the treatment you received either, and I do believe your changes were well-meaning. I'm doing what I can to repair the situation while avoiding my apparently non-productive involvement with the actual project at this time. While I'm sure this must have tarnished your opinion of Misplaced Pages, I do hope that you'll stick around...and frankly, I care a lot more about the quality of one's contributions to the project than how old they are or how long they've been here. Chin up. ] (]) 14:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
]


Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
== WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter ==


In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 15:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0192 -->


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 22:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
== Re: The Princess Bride ==


==Concern regarding ]==
{{talkback|Erik|The Princess Bride}}
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
] (] &#124; ]) 00:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== Tb ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 04:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Tb|MichaelQSchmidt#The Lone Ranger}}


== Re: Star Trek 2 == == Legacy.com ==


Hi there. I saw your update to the death date at ]. I started a related discussion at {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Conflicting_death_dates_on_Legacy.com}} that you're invited to join. Thanks.—] (]) 18:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Talkback|Robsinden|Star Trek 2}}


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
== Apollo 13 (film) ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Hi RAP, I've had to quick fail the nomination at ] due to referencing issues. If you want some ideas for expansion/improvement, feel free to contact me. ] (]) 03:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Template:Alien ==


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
I'm just going to hit the highlights since any long discusion should wind up on the template talk page.


Standing consensus regarding biographies is that:
#People are not categorized by employer or projects they have contributed to.
#They are also not included in navigation boxes for an employer or specific projects. This is especially true with actors and filmmakers.
Both of these are to prevent bloating in the footer of the article where prolific people can wind up with dozens of templates and categories making both worthless.

There are exceptions out there, but they tend to be few ''and'' they generally have tight limits on who gets added to the templates. But even then you wind up with something like the collapsed mess at ].

There might, ''might'', be good reason to add in the creators of the the two franchise. But not each director, screenwriter, producer, etc. And definitely not the actors.

- ] (]) 20:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

{{Talkback|J Greb|Template}}
== Deletion discussion about ] ==
Hello, Rusted AutoParts, and thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at ] whether the article Paradise Lost (2012 film) should be in Misplaced Pages. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Paradise Lost (2012 film), which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the ].

Thanks again for your contributions! {{z82}} <small>]</small>] 18:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

== RFA thank you ==

Thank you for your comment and support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, ''']''' '']'' 21:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

== ] November 2011 Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 22:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0207 -->
==License tagging for File:PMDA.jpg==
Thanks for uploading ]. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of ] to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from ], click on ], then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on ]. Thank you for your cooperation.<!-- User:OrphanBot/untagged-new --> --] (]) 16:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

== Re: ] ==

:''<small>Discussion relocated from ]; it's about the editing of Rusted AutoParts, not SMcCandlish.</small>''
Unfortunately, i do not view Misplaced Pages as an ], where the minority can trump the majority. ] are allowed, but whatever. I changed the picture. And '''NEVER''' accuse me of something i'm not. ] (]) 14:17 6 December 2011 (UTC)
:Or what? Go ahead and threaten me, like you did the one of the other editors who disagreed with you, please. You'll just be making my point for me. I have not {{em|accused you of being}} anything; while I don't go so far as ], I'm very cognizant of the difference between addressing perceived actions and labeling a person. I stand by my description of your behavior at that article, however. If you take issue with some aspect of the criticism, I'll by happy to explain, though I'm highly skeptical such a discussion would be productive, and certain that you would find it unpleasant (not because I'm mean, but because the facts, and more to the point your own words, speak for themselves, and what they say is not flattering).
:Also, you need to read ] and ] (not to mention ]; the term refers to a form of hierarchical rule by a colluding elite, which has nothing to do with the debate that was at hand, unless you think I and others disagreeing with you wield some kind of special wiki-political power that is wiki-oppressing you because of your wiki-economic wiki-class). In point of fact, one or more editors with principled, defensible objections do actually generally result in a case of {{em|no consensus}} having been reached (at that point; further ] usually resolves matters).
:What really applied in this situation was ]: You ] inserted a spoiler, based on ] that does not trump policy or even other guidelines; others ] this, giving reasons in both edit summary and talk page, because they felt the spoiler went too far and that you were not properly interpreting that guideline. What ame next should have been the ], but you short-circuited that with a ], ] and ], and even blatantly violated the ], an unwavering policy (except when reverting vandalism); you're lucky no one reported this at ], because you would {{em|certainly}} have been ] for a while, even if people ultimately agreed with your take on ], which they mostly don't (I recall that one commentator on that talk page agreed with you, maybe there were even two, but the rest of us did not; bad odds).
:PS: When other editors suggest that you read this policy or that guideline, {{em|you really should read them}}. The fact that your edit summaries show that you misinterpreted my reference to ] as some kind of legal threat suggests that you are not reading any Misplaced Pages policy documents other than the ones you like for personal reasons, such as ]. You won't do well here if that's the tactic you take.
:PPS: You are a ]!!! There, I just accused you of being something you are not. To quote St. Hulka from '']'', "Lighten up, Francis."
:— <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ʕ(<sup>Õ</sup>ل<sup>ō</sup>)ˀ</span> <small>].</small></font> 00:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
::"It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." A simple statement of well-established consensus on Misplaced Pages. Article-specific talk page discussion does not override this general principle. Every article about a film or TV show should summarize the plot, without any regard for some people's emotional feelings about "spoilers". The same principle applies to images. Anyone who doesn't want to encounter a "spoiler" should not read the applicable Misplaced Pages article. Problem solved. ] ] 07:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

==Orphaned non-free image File:Sophia, Zombie.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 06:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

== Conduct ==

Rather than go around littering every single talk page, I thought it best to bring this discussion somewhere more appropriate. I must admit I am not impressed by the way you have acted towards me, and hope that we can find some kind of resolution. You have accused me of a lot of things, none of which are true, and you seem to be trying to undermine my integrity as an editor. Warning people on their talk pages of things I might do to "their" articles is really the last straw.

At risk of repeating myself, I would invite you to re-read the guidelines at ] and ] and suggest that you only introduce articles for future films when they are in fact notable. This would avoid the frustration you may feel when other experienced and conscientious editors try to redirect these or nominate them for deletion. No-one is picking on you, just the articles. You may want to consider re-reading ] as well. You shouldn't feel protective over the articles. I know you're creating them in good faith.

I am not going around, as you have accused me of more than once, looking for articles to delete. However, from time to time, I do monitor certain things, and if I find vandalism, I will revert it, and sometimes, if I find articles that go against guidelines, I will try to fix this too.

You seem to want to disregard guidelines, saying that they are "just guidelines". Whilst this is true to some extent, they are here for a reason. They have been discussed and agreed upon by other editors, and consensus has been found. Therefore they are a good marker of common consensus and, whilst they should be treated with common sense, they should be, for the most part followed, as they distil the essence of other policies and guidelines, as well as the opinions of other editors. Of course, it is not always practical to follow them, but when it is, I believe this is the best course of action.

I'm sorry I had to bring this here, but I cannot let the way you have been acting towards and about me continue. Please do not assume bad faith. You seem to want to discredit me and make me into some kind of monster. I'm not - I'm just acting, like we all are, to make Misplaced Pages a better and more encyclopedic place. Sometimes different editors have differing opinions of what that is, but again, that is why we have guidelines to follow.

You know, we'd probably get on in real life. Have a good weekend! --] (]) 17:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
:Well, i do act sometimes as if i own the articles, but that's really not why i get upset. When i created the ''Star Trek 2'' article, it took me '''3''' hours of digging into the underbellies of the internet to source every last statement in the article so it be accurate. That's when i lose my cool. ] only annoys me because of that one part. When i create an article, i create it so over time it can flourish, rather than the day it begins filming, scramble to throw together a quick, half-assed article. As shown, the likes of '']'' and currently ''Star Trek 2'' has been a frequently contributed to set of articles. Due to a one month premature creation, they could one day be featured articles or GA. And you're right, we could probably get along in real life. ] (]) 17:50 9 December 2011 (UTC)
:: I can understand that frustration. When I redirected the Star Trek article, I'm sure I copied across the text though... That's what I mean about developing the articles on the subject matter page - that way the article can be developed until it's notable in its own right and there's no risk of people (like me!) coming along and nominating for deletion. I remember talk of a Godzilla film and the article survived a couple of AfDs and still hasn't seen the light of day - that's the kind of thing that shouldn't be on here. Eventually there was consensus to have that merged to the ] page. --I'm sure that won't be the case with ''Star Trek'', but it can happen with other projects. --] (]) 18:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hello old boy, I've started a discussion at ] - would appreciate your input. ] (]) 23:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

== New Year's Eve ==

I thought I'd come here about my reversion of one of your edits. I tried to make my edit summary clear, but I didn't understand why you wanted to reorder the cast without listing the "starring" cast first. And I didn't understand what you meant by "remerge". I'll watch your Talk page so we can discuss it if you like.--] (]) 01:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:I'd hardly call it an edit war. In your first change, you never said you were reordering the cast alphabetically - you didn't clarify that until you reverted. At least now I understand what you were doing. I tried to see if there was any consensus for alphabetical ordering at the Film Project's Talk page, but, so far, no consensus at all. So, I'll leave it the way you have it.--] (]) 04:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

== ] ==

You ], but given new information that the film is now on hold, would suggest a redirect to ] is more appropriate as per ], and as per suggested by multiple editors at the deletion discussion. Would appreciate input at ]. --] (]) 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

== 3RR ==

A breach of ] requires more than three reversions in a 24-hour period, so is incorrect. According to the history at ], Bidgee has made only three reversions in 24 hours recently, so he hasn't breached 3RR. As of right now, he has made only two reversions in the past 24 hours, so right now he's not even close. However, ''you'' have made three, so you're close to breaching 3RR right now. For the record, Bidgee is correct, including a film that is in pre-production ''is'' ]. The film itself fails ], so there shouldn't even be an article on it.--] (]) 16:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I've now opened a report at ] as you made 4 reverts in 24 hours and 2 minutes. --] (]) 04:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

== Breaking Bad GAC ==

I guess I meant the back-to-back nominations for Outstanding Drama series.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 17:04, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
:I'll get to it before you have to open your presents.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 05:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
::Did you see my latest comments.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 01:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
:::I am a little confused as to whether you are still concerned about the GAC nomination or if you just want me to close it as a fail. You don't seem to be responding to my concerns any more.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
::::I got your reply. There are about a half dozen outstanding issues. You should either address or reply to each concern.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 16:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

== Edit-warring ==

You shouldn't need to be told this since ] but, don't try to bulldoze your edits into articles. As the editor trying to add to the article, the ] is on ''you'' to gain ] for your additions. is inappropriate. Open the discussion first, gain consensus to add your content and then add it. Don't add it and then expect it to remain in the article while discussion is underway. The status-quo normally stands until there is consensus to change. You know that. --] (]) 09:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

== Re: C&A GA nom ==

You're clearly not reading the directions posted on the GA page. To make any fixes, it has to be to the template itself on the talk page. The bot fills the page using that. ] <sub>]</sub> 05:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

== Tower Heist GAN ==

I have reviewed '']'' and placed the article on hold. See ] or ] for comments for improvement. Thanks. -- ] ] 13:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

== Happy Holidays! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]

—<span style="solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print">''']&nbsp;]'''</span> is wishing you ]! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ], ], ], ], ], ], ] or even the ], this is a special time of year for almost everyone! <br />

<small>Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to your friends' talk pages</small>.
{{clear}}
</div> </div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:10&#39;s regeneration.jpg==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
== GAN ] ==
==Your draft article, ]==

]
Hi,

I have reviewed your nomination and left comments at ]. The article looks quite good, with only a few problems noted. I may add a few as I continue to look through it. Meanwhile I have put the article on hold.

Best wishes, ] (]) 21:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

*Yes, congratulations to you also for a most fascinating article. Best wishes, ] (]) 19:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

== '']'' No Consensus! ==

'']'' No Consensus!
Hello there, the article ''Untitled Star Trek Sequel'' was undeniably unaccepted by other Wikipedians that read the article. However, the article was left without a consensus. Would you like to resume the ]?--] (]) 18:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks RAP, here is one yourself for your multiple contributions to raising article quality. I'd have given you a Good Article barnstar but I couldn't find the option, lol. ] (]) 16:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
|}

== Misplaced Pages:Good article nominations ==

You are not suppose to edit ] directly. I am not sure if you have confused the bots, but please reread the procedures on the page and follow them.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 19:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

== ] December 2011 Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 22:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0219 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:PMDA.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 03:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
:Got it - thanks! ] (]) 00:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
:Just FYI - its been orphaned once again... ] (]) 05:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

== GAN ==

So, just now I noticed you jumped the gun on me and nominated ]. Well, you'd better put refs in Home media and Sequels/spinoffs, replace (though one I just fixed to hide...), and fix the styling throughout the article (some are bare urls, other lack publisher, etc.), just for starters. I may even help you with that sometime. ] ] 01:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/The Muppets' Wizard of Oz/1|ts=04:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)}}
] (]) 04:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

==Non-free rationale for File:Tensessions.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ].

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] ] 14:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

== A good guideline ==

Please go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Dorothy_L._Sayers#Written_like_an_essay to see how I handled the fact that I am about to do a major overhaul of an article, and note the specifics I gave, the reasons, the time-line, and the chance for others to comment. This is a good example of how to proceed when a big change has to be made by someone the page writers have never heard of before. If you follow such examples, you should avoid the sort of trouble stirred up before. Good luck in all your future endeavors.--] 20:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

== Welcome Back :D ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I heard you had some hard times and since you're better now how about you settle yourself down with a Beer. Hope you feel better soon. ] (]) 11:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
|}

== ] ==

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Can I ask you to clarify a couple of the problems you listed on the review page? Thanks —<font face="IrishJig">''']'''<sub>]''']'''</sub></font> 00:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

==Orphaned non-free image File:Breakingbadopening.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 12:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

== Common names ==

Hey there Rusted AutoParts - ] doesn't exist - but ] does - Leanne Barlow is not Leanne's common name.] <small>]</small> 20:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
:You have made a point. A point of not discussing something and moving regardless on anyone else who may have an opinion on the matter. Those who edit soap opera articles usually discuss most things that are not that straight forward.] <small>]</small> 21:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

== Queen ==

. <font color="DarkGray">...</font> ] <sub>]</sub> 01:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Castle - Kate Beckett.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Castle - Kate Beckett.jpg==

<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

'''PLEASE NOTE:'''

* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{tlp|helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 06:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hey,

Note sure if you're aware or not, but to be included on the specific season page a player has to meet very stringent criteria (see here: ]), which is meant to keep those who play just a few games or have minor journeyman careers (which I would argue Comrie fall under), as the list would simply just become too long. Note that this is a much more stringent criteria than ] or ] for having their own page. I looked closely, but don't see any category which Comrie falls under. If i'm wrong, re-add with the source (retirement, that is); or if you want to contest it, do so at the talk page. ] 02:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

== Your edit on Act of Valor ==

Hello, I've reverted your edit on ]. It seems there was a missunderstanding. The parts I edited back in weren't the parts that were subject to a copyright violation. The "obvious copyright violation" that Parrot of Doom was talking about was not reverted back into the article. Also, with your edit, you reverted some vandalism back into the article and removed a valid category. This is also why I reverted your edit. ] (]) 15:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <font color="ORANGE">]</font><font color="NAVY"><sup>''']''' </sup></font> 17:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

== AfD and PROD notifications ==

Hey Rusted AutoParts. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the ] project's experiments. If you could go ] and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links on the page), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swalling{{@}}wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! <font style="font-family:Palatino, Georgia, serif;">]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]</font> 22:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

== Breaking Bad GA ==

I just finished reviewing your Breaking Bad GA. Only two small issues to sort out! Cheers--] (]) 02:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

== WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the ]. ] ] 00:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0243 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for March 8==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

== March 2012 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 01:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <font color="ORANGE">]</font><font color="NAVY"><sup>''']''' </sup></font> 03:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for March 16==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 18:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

== TS-19 ==

Sounds like a plan. I'll try and get started don Friday. :) —] (]) 01:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
:Hey! Sorry I took longer than expected. I was just being lazy as hell, being spring break and all. :P
:I found some reviews that you can add to the reception section.
::http://splashpage.mtv.com/2010/12/05/the-walking-dead-season-finale-review-episode-6-ts-19/
::http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-12-06/entertainment/27083377_1_doctor-plans-shane-zombie-virus
::http://voices.washingtonpost.com/celebritology/2010/12/walking_dead_season_2_finale_t.html
::http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2010/12/the-walking-dead-review-episode-16-ts-19.html
:—] (]) 21:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

== Re: ] ==

Discussion ]. ] (]) 05:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

==RRHOF... Again==
There is now a note. Why is that not acceptable? You said originally that you felt the distinction should be made. And now it is, which satisfies your demands. And everything is still in one category and follows the source, which satisfies this demand. Either way, I've requested a third opinion.

By the way, we're both probably going to get blocked again. Enjoy your day(s) off! -- ]<sup>]</sup> 23:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh I did see that, and I still disagree. They are performers, so they should be included in the main table. Even if they are still in the same section, you're creating a distinction that the RRHOF disagrees with. Having everything in one table is also useful for sortability purposes. That way users can sort all performers alphabetically. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

== April 2012 ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware, ] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) &#124; ] 00:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

:I have asked the sysop who blocked both of you last time to consider reblocking you. The request is ] if you wish to comment upon it. — ] (]) &#124; ] 03:54, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

== WQA Notice ==

==Notice of Wikiquette Assistance discussion==
Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic ].}}<!--Template:WQA-notice--> Thank you.

==Orphaned non-free image File:Breakingbadopening.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 11:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

== Walking Dead GA ==

I finished a Walking Dead GA review. Only a few issues to fix. Cheers.--] (]) 21:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 20==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

==GA review of '']''==

Hello. I have listed out a few concerns for the article at the review page. I suggest you go through them and rectify them at the earliest; one week's time has been provided for this. Currently, the article is ({{GAReview|status=on hold}}). Cheers, ~*~''']]'''~*~ 05:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

You added an award nomination but did not supply a citation; I have undone this addition. You're welcome to re-add it with an appropriate cite. ] (]) 15:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ] ==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. ] (]) 05:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ] (]) 06:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
:See also: ]. ] (]) 06:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

== Bond 24 ==

See ]: "] is not policy". In other words, it's only advice and it doesn't have to be stuck to rigidly, '''IF''' the subject is worthy of note. - ] (] • ]) 15:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
:It would have been better if you had discussed it before the revert. There is one source cited, but a Google search shows a number of other references: To have put them all in would be overkill as only one is needed. - ] (] • ]) 16:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 27==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ] (]) 01:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

==Frid==
Hi, Rusted. Well, I won't revert at this point, but now the article contradicts itself: The lead and the infobox say April 14, but the main article body, in the death section, gives both the 13th and the 14th. We can't have the article contradict itself. What would be the best solution? --] (]) 02:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

:Well, it's more than speculation &mdash; it was reported the 13th by the LA Times, the Washington Post and USA Today, to name three major papers. And both they and the ones saying the 14th have cited family sources since the family made a premature statement and then told a few papers something different. So that's not a practical phrase. And having someone shoot the tombstone is ].

:With all due respect, when major ] papers contradict themselves, we can only report what they all say. Picking one over the other is POV. It also goes against the consensus on the article talk page.--] (]) 03:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ] (]) 14:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Are you planning to conclude this review any time soon? It has been over two weeks since your short comments. ] (]) 03:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

==''Tron: Legacy''==

Hello. I am sorry to say but the article '']'' has '''failed''' its ]. You are encouraged to work on the article and take up a ] of the article before submitting it for another review. Regards, ~*~''']]'''~*~ 11:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. ] (]) 11:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:Pulp Fiction/GA3|ts=18:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)}}
] (]) 18:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

== Pulp Fiction ==

Is there a list of things that the article needs to be done to the ] article for it to pass. I'd like to work on the article and your input would be appreciated. ] (]) 19:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ] (]) 11:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Phenomenal work on expanding the '']'' article so it can qualify to be a ]. ] (]) 03:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
|}

== Thx ==

Thanks for the cookie. I'm not done with the article yet, though. Graduating high school was my first priority, so I didn't get nearly as much done as I wanted. I graduated yesterday, so I'll try and finish out real soon. :) —] (]) 17:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

== ] on ] ==

Hi Rusted AutoParts,

I've noticed that you have been removing ] from the list of highest grossing films on ]. Currently, the majority of people participating in a discussion on ] think that The Intouchables should be included on the top 10 list. As I explained there, if we want to list films by the how much money they made in a given calander year, that would require significant changes to the film years lists. For instance, films like Avatar and Titanic, that made lots of money in the following year after their release, would need to be moved to another year or appear on two lists. Many other films might change places on the lists, as many films that were released near the end of the year probably made a lot of their money in the next year. I think the easiest way to handle the lists (and the way I think they have been handled until now) is to list films' grosses all for one year, and to use Box Office Mojo as the source for what year a film is counted in. I don't see a compelling reason to change from doing that. If you disagree, please discuss the reasons why you think we should do something different at ], rather than just removing ] from the list without explanation. ] (]) 13:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

== Edit-warring on BLPs ==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

Your edit summary ''(he is very against religion. He is atheist)'' indicates a misunderstanding of what an ] is; it has nothing to do with religion, and refers to deities. Your edit summary ''(give me a source saying he's agnostic, whereas his actions on his show clearly show otherwise)'' indicates a misunderstanding of Misplaced Pages editing policy; we do not edit BLPs based on our own perceptions of a person's actions. We must rely instead on ]. Maher has self-identified many times as an ]. He has been referred to as an Agnostic in a multitude of reliable sources, such as one, so he would fit that category. He has at times even that he is an Atheist. ] (]) 03:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

== Comic book movie ==

Hey i didn't want to revert you...but comic book movie seems to count as unreliable source. Tenebrae probably started with the realization of that. But overall if you notice it even says "fansite" on the url and that is close enough to prove that it's not really on Misplaced Pages's standards. Even still go on with your good work on Misplaced Pages ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 19:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

== Tom Maynard 18 June 2012 ==

In ] you and another editor appear to disagree whether cause of death for Tom Maynard should be "train strike" or "hit by train," but I can't tell who prefers which. The current version is "train strike." Just inviting you to discuss this on ] if you want. ] (]) 18:05, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

== Comment on Nora Ephron's page ==

She literally just died. WA Post just confirmed it in a tweet.

--] (]) 00:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for June 29==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 16:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Taken2TheatricalPoster.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 23:36, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

== Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)/GA2 ==

You have not responded to ]. Please do so soon.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 13:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
== Orphaned non-free media (File:Taken2TheatricalPoster.jpg) ==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 04:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

{{Talkback|InfamousPrince}}

== Catherine ==

Once you stop being rude.<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 14:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

:What ''on earth'' are ? I am completely perplexed. You think it's rude to mention her scar? I think there are probably hundreds of people who heard something from a source of questionable reliablilty (say, ]), and would come to us for the accurate story, which--with a source like the ]--we could provide for them. You are entitled to disagree about whether or not this merits inclusion, but to suggest I'm being rude is preposterous.

:Understand this: We do not all think identically here, and we need to recognize that when dealing with others. If you think I'm being rude, explain why, because it's sure as hell not clear to me why you think this. (Note: I '''''do''''' accept that you are being sincere in this accusation; if I was presuming to know everything, I might just conclude that you were being a troll, but I'm choosing to regard this as incomplete communication.) But when you ''do'' communicate, please be careful in how you do it. I ''still'' have absolutely no idea what word you were intending when you wrote "intricle". I looked it up, it doesn't exist, so I tried to guess what word you may have misspelled, and I just can't figure it out. So the point is, '''''I'm''''' trying to understand you. Now do ''your'' part, and please make yourself more clear.

:And of course, it follows from this, that perhaps I'm failing to make ''my''self clear. If this is the case, please say so.

:Cheers, ] (]) 13:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
::Firstly, i was referring to previous edit summaries, where you have a rude demeanor. And your reply here is quite rude with sentences like "understand this" or doing ''this'' to certain words. And intrical (i spelt it wrong) is another word for integral, meaning it isn't a necessary part of the article. <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 14:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Thank you, RAP, for your civil and cogent response. I'd like to reply now:
:::*First of all, on the article in question, I have made four edits, and left three edit summaries. To wit:
:::# '''Edit summary:''' No edit summary was left; I suppose that could be regarded as uncivil.
:::# '''Edit summary:''' ''Kiss off''. Was that uncivil? Clearly, yes. Yet I hasten to point out that a) this was several days ago, b) it did not involve you, and c) the involved editor and I have worked things out rather well.
:::# '''Edit summary:''' ''Respectfully disagree with reverting editor. Consider A) it got a lot of coverage in the meda, and B) wikipedia is increasingly THE source for accurate information, and someone could well come here looking to verify this.'' Was this uncivil? Not in any universe I've visited. Indeed, if there were an award for the <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red">Epitome in Edit Summary Excellence</font>, I think I'd put my own name in nomination for that one. And I hasten to point out that the editor I reverted there, ], expressed no misgivings about my demeanor.
:::# '''Edit summary:''' ''Well, I think we can agree that the addition was not "intricle" to the article, or anything else. I'll hold off on reverting your removal of material that I believe I justified, and ask that you tell us what word you were trying to use.'' Was this uncivil? I'm presuming you think it was, since this is the only one of my edit summaries that pertains directly to you. Here's my take: Actions speak louder than words. Now look at my actions: I did '''''NOT''''' revert you, even though I disagreed with you, because I wanted to give you another chance to explain yourself. If that's not civil, I don't know what is.
::::My conclusion is that my edit summaries, while imperfect, do not distract so greatly that we could not have been discussing the content of the article, which is what I was clearly trying to do.
:::*When you say I am being rude by using phrases like "Understand this", I am not totally certain I understand, but I'm guessing that you feel it sounds dogmatic or overbearing. I choose, when I read someone else's words (and knowing that I cannot see them) to interpret their words as charitably as possible, so I would never have come to that conclusion. But, keeping in mind ], I have to acknowledge that I cannot expect other editors to read the way I do. So I apologize for giving offense, and will try to avoid this in the future (though I'm sure the habit will take a long time to break).
:::*Now when you say I do ''this'' to certain words, are you speaking of the use of italics to indicate emphasis? If this is a complaint, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. RAP, if we were sitting down in the same room, both you and I (unless you are a Rusty '''''Bot''''') would be italicizing words all the time. Written English provides very few ways to add natural emphasis to our words. Of the four that come to mind (<u>underlining</u>, '''boldfacing''', ''italicizing'', and ALL CAPS), I tend to think that italicizing is the mildest and yet most effective way to imitate the natural "feel" of speech. And I don't understand why it would offend you. I've been editing Misplaced Pages since 2006, and this is the first time I've ever seen that complaint.
:::Good talking to you. ] (]) 16:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
::::I don't know, maybe it's the way you come off. I read this and all i can think of is "this guy is rude." Especially when you go into great detail to defend yourself, and even in the above comment, it seems very rude and condescending.<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 04:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
:::::Well, I don't really know what to say. When I speak briefly, via edit summaries, I come across rude. When I "go into great detail", I come across rude. It's not helpful that you're not nailing down details, but that's not necessarily your fault, since sometimes (just as you say) someone can just "come off" in a certain way.

:::::I think it's best in a situation like this to simply ] (which shouldn't be too hard to do, since I'm taking an awful lot of time trying to work things out with you) and instead of inferring my attitude, just look at my work and my ideas for the articles. After all, even if I am a bastard, that doesn't mean I can't be a valuable contributor to the encyclopedia, right? What do you say? ] (]) 12:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

== 2012 in film ==

I checked a few of the names you removed , and the ones I looked at appear to be legitimate 2012 film industry deaths? Is there a reason you removed them? ] (]) 21:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
:Every actor is considered notable if he/she has a Misplaced Pages article. I will be restoring them. In the future, please get a consensus on the talk page for such a major deletion instead of making a unilateral decision. If you feel that some of the actors are not notable enough for Misplaced Pages, you can go through the normal deletion process. Thanks. ] (]) 21:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
::Since you're a regular I won't template you. But I suggest that you review ] and ask you to discuss on the talk page instead of edit warring and making unilateral decisions. That's the way it's done on Misplaced Pages. You've been around long enough to know that. ] (]) 19:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
:::Edit warring includes more than 3RR. Again, review ]. You are edit warring if you continue to revert after being asked to discuss on the talk page. Your opinion about what is "bloated" carries no more weight than my opinion or any other editor's opinion. All of the names are linked to Misplaced Pages articles. You alone don't decide what is notable. Please stop continuing to remove the information without getting ] on the talk page. As I said, you've been around long enough to know this. ] (]) 19:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi Rusted AutoParts. I've just come across the "Notable deaths" section in this article, where you've to include many people who died in 2010. It appears it has stayed that way for months now. I'm confused as to what's going on there. In your edit summary you refer to "an expansion process"...? Thanks, <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 07:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under Misplaced Pages policy, all newly created ''']''' must have at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Madison Lintz|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] (]) 16:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Interesting article. FYI, I've reviewed it for GAC. Good luck, and let me know how I can help. After it passes (which it will, after you've made the changes I've requested), I'd be willing to copyedit it further if you like. ] (]) 17:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

== Smallville ==

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> This includes being petty and just removing all images entirely because you don't like people disagreeing with you. ] ] 00:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
*Just a heads up, you're past 3RR with . It's likely someone will report you at ], if you don't mind me suggesting, perhaps the best thing to do would be to self-revert until some consensus is reached on the talk page, in order to avoid being blocked? - ]] 00:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for September 3==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 14:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

== Apology ==

Apology accepted. Please try to discuss on talk pages when you disagree with someone. ] (]) 21:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

== Kylie Platt ==

Hi, I've just noticed that you moved ] to ], without discussing the move on the talk page. What bothers me a little bit more is that the correct article name is actually ], so I've had to contact an admin to help sort out the situation. - ] ] 14:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

== A cup of coffee for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | showed up as potential vandalism on STiKi, but instead of reverting the edit and warning you, I'll give you a cup of coffee instead. Drink up, and get more energy for further anti-vandalism efforts! :) ] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{]}} message on ].</small></span> @ 20:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
|}

== Userpage reply ==

I'm not an admin at this point in time, you'll have to ask an active admin or post a query to ] or something like that. Good luck! &mdash; ''']''' (]) 15:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Take a look at this article news report which dates from November 2010 and this article which dates to January 2011. Now, it is possible that a politican with the name of Minoru Mizuta did also die in August 2012 but I was unable to find any independent corroboration of this asserted fact, all I could find in my research were mirror-sites to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

== September 2012 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ]&nbsp;without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> <span style="padding: 3px; background: #EEE; color: #007; border: #CCC 1px solid; text-transform: uppercase; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">] ● ] ● ]</span> 20:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
== Deletion discussion about Victor Brännström ==

Hello Rusted AutoParts,

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a deletion discussion about the redirect ]. If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please leave your comments ] Thanks, <span style="border-bottom: 2px solid #F40; font-family:Cambria, serif;">]&#8239;•&#8239;]</span> 15:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 8==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

== Knighthood ==

When a man receives a knighthood, 'Sir' becomes a title part of their style of address. What on earth can it have to do with 'weight'? ] (]) 16:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

:I'm disappointed that you have not replied. You are quite wrong; ] states that biography articles on Knights do not normally include 'Sir' in the article title, save where it is useful for disambiguation, but it is still a title that is invariably quoted on the entries in the Deaths in ... series. Have a look back at some old entries if you want confirmation. I have raised this issue on ]. ] (]) 19:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 15==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

== Sandler ==

Thanks for finally giving a better explanation (I wish you'd done that 2 days ago). Please keep in mind that we editors are here to work together, not against each other, and to use talk pages -- instead of edit warring. --] (]) 23:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.

I reverted the redirect and PRODded the article as I don't think it's correct to redirect a person's bio to a TV show she appeared in. She has appeared in several other roles. It should either be made a real sourced article or deleted.

See ]: "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. In such a case, it is better that the target article contain a redlink than a redirect back to itself." ] (]) 05:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

: Don't just put the redirect back. See ]. And ''The Walking Dead'' is not her only credit. She's also in ], ] at least. That's why it's wrong to redirect to ''The Walking Dead''. ] (]) 14:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 15:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Madison Lintz|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] (]) 16:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

== Citations ==

Hello, it seems that you're an experienced editor. I just wanted to ask that you fill in your references when adding material to articles instead of adding bare URLs. You can use the citation templates with little work, as you may know. Thanks. ]&nbsp;{{su|p= ] |b= ]|fontsize=1.5ex}} 02:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

* Hey sorry, I know it's not right. I was in the process of fixing it. ]&nbsp;{{su|p= ] |b= ]|fontsize=1.5ex}} 15:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

== Notification ==

Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

== November 2012 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for personal attacks.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 20:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
{{unblock reviewed|Well, considering the debate is still open and i've been blocked before i had the chance to explain myself, perhaps we should look at this as trigger happy and too soon? Plujs, allow me to point out the editor whose feelings i've "hurt" continued to revert? A little biased in his favor too.|decline=No grounds for unblock provided. was quite sufficient. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 22:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)}}
:Your defence to "personal attacks" is "BUT WAIT, PEOPLE ARE STILL TALKING"? And you have a chance to explain yourself ''here''. I'd suggest you take advantage of it. ] (]) 22:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
:'''Note'''. I notice this User Account has been blocked 3 times. I do not understand how can lead to a Block, unlike the other Blocks that I seen on this User Account before. This is not too extreme to lead to a Block again. I suggest giving him a Warning instead, with a strong reminder that the next time will be an .--] (]) 09:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::My problem is that there is an ANI discussion about the conduct i used on the BB talk page and i can't discuss it as i was blocked way before i had the chance to explain plus the block wasn't even suggested at all, one editor just did it. I'm wondering why this occured when a block for the personal attacks wasn't even suggested. ] (]) 14:10 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::Alright, i'll move the ANI discussion here.
{{User|Rusted AutoParts}} began reverting me on ] without discussion. When I initiated one on the talk page (]), he instantly became aggravated and starting pouring a bucket of ad hominems at me, while skewing other editors' opinions to conveniently suit his editing choice, which is discriminatory and offensive in nature. This is how his replies build up:<br />
*
* (Pot calling the kettle... what?)
*"Corrected" the previous attack to an even more obviously personal one: (referring to my reply , where I merely pointed out that it only makes sense that a US production, which airs on a US channel, will be primarily in English.)
*The big finish:
I know I should have known better and stopped reverting too, but RAP's outrageous barrage of attacks got the best of me. ] (]) 18:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
:Where do I begin? This wasn't even directed at you personally, i was stating that your theory German was a main language was. German was used twice in two episodes of one season, and Spanish, as Drivethroughosts pointed out, has been used in 4 seasons in a highly used manner. (Pot calling the kettle... what?)
"Corrected" the previous attack to an even more obviously personal one: (referring to my reply , where I merely pointed out that it only makes sense that a US production, which airs on a US channel, will be primarily in English.) Now, i was going to remove this completely, but I know that is frowned upon. I thought it was the case as it was odd your focus shifted to just English being used, but I soon realized that you were just being petty because German was removed. Speaking of which, how did you get off scot clean when you continuously edit warred, even when i asked you stop until someone had the same exact view as you (Spanish and German, or none), as the comments clearly stated they were fine with Spanish staying in? And lastly is where the only place I'll apologize for (My car was damaged purposely around this time, so i was pretty pissed off). Asking anyone to perform ] is just grotesque, so i do apologize. None of these responses were aimed to be personal, but seeing as it hurt your feelings, i sit confused. I could just as easily cry at the sheer stupidity that was displayed. But i won't as i rarely cry and you aren't stupid, but the whole situation was stupid and unnecessarily escalated. Now, with that said, Hearfourmewesique, if it's an apology you seek, you'll not receive one (except the ]), but i do hope you acknowledge this wasn't a personal attack, just poorly expressed frustration. ] (]) 15:11 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::"suck my dick" is merely poorly expressed frustration? Get better at expressing frustration. Find a way of doing it that isn't so gratuitously and unnecessarily offensive. People who don't tend not to (or, rather shouldn't) last. ] (]) 15:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
:::I already explained what spawned that crude and awful response. Some kids keyed my car and smashed a window. I wasn't exactly pleased in real life and on here. I regret the statement and can only hope that you can see that. ] (]) 15:33 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::::I hope it passes in court for you someday: "Sorry your honor, some kids smashed my car window so I stabbed my neighbor." If you truly believe is not a personal attack, you might be unsuitable for Misplaced Pages altogether. ] (]) 20:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::::*A couple more points:
::::#Even if "bullshit" wasn't directed at me, this is not an appropriate tone to begin your part of a discussion. Especially when you refused to initiate it to begin with, forcing me to do so myself.
::::#Someone DID have the exact same view as I, it was TheOldJacobite, the second comment in the thread. Another editor expressed that his ideal position is just English, but he didn't care for it enough to vote either way. It doesn't mean, by ANY applicable logic, that he supports you, mainly because '''his ideal position is the same as mine'''. You are still misrepresenting those editors, and if that's not bad enough &ndash; you point at me in the most infantile of manners (hey look, the kid I just threw a rock at spilled ice cream over your lawn!) to try and soften your own fall. This, too, is extremely unsuitable for Misplaced Pages.
::::#Another piece of advice (still unsure why I even bother to begin with) &ndash; remaining unapologetic and refusing to acknowledge that you actually '''did''' hurt someone's feelings by putting quotation marks and using excessive sarcasm whenever the subject comes up is, again, the last thing you want to do. That is, if you want to redeem yourself. ] (]) 21:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
:::::Some tips for you as well:
*When someone asks for you to wait until a more ironed out consensus (IE, if that one editor is divided, you and Jacobite say no and me and another editor say it's fine) DON'T continue to revert, even if "my outrageous barrage of attacks" (i'm not putting quotes around this as a sarcastic theme, rather quoting what you said) gets "the best of you" (again, not meant to be sarcastic). I've been in that boat before, it don't hold water.
**When someone says "They misread your intentions" (meaning when you claimed I discriminated against you, how?) for one thing and then realizing it was you saying "my way or the highway", don't continue claiming discrimination, as it's slanderous to me.
***No one is a saint or a sinner in this case. My hopes is for both of us to push this behind us and be able to work together rather than biting one another's head off. And yes, my anger towards the vandals to my car should not have been radiated onto you. I am much calmer and reading back on half the things i've said, i must have come off as a giant asshole. I do apologize in all scenarios and perhaps this month block would give me time to really work on becoming a better editor. ] (]) 21:55 4 November 2012 (UTC)

== Apollo 13 ==

Hi, Could you edit the Apollo 13 film article, cropping the cast photos and adding a photo of the blu-ray cover. Thanx. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Possibly unfree File:BreakingBadcastphoto.jpg ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 04:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

== Heya ==

In an attempt to get past the impasse that has been reached re the capitalisation of I in intro on the ] article, I have created two additional sub-sections where users can put their for/against argument comments in without getting caught up in ]. These sections are purely for providing reasons and not for arguing back and forth, although discussions are welcome to continue in the above section. If you could come and give your view that would be great. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 21:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

== Holiday cheer ==

{| style="border: 3px solid red; background-color: #FFFAF0;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"|'''Holiday Cheer'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid blue;"|''']''' '']'' is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes ], and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.
|}

== i need you help ==

hello how are you, I want to report a person who insult me and he dont need do it ​​by rank in wikipedia, is doing and of course I'll saying nothing, he rudely replied ,
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Darkwarriorblake # VANDALISM.3F.3F
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Grapple_X # nobody_answer_me_in_the_consensus

I hope your help, thanks.

== insults are the problem: s ==

don't is the idea insult me. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Hey, ==
I just uploaded my first image! (yay). Have added it to the ]. Can you just give the fair use a once over and check that it's ok please? It can be found Thank you. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 11:00, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Teamwork Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In particular for the ongoing discussion on ] regarding a pesky little I. At the end of the day, it may not have been resolved but we all did work together to try and get it sorted, even if we did feel at times we were banging our heads on our desks and calling our computer screens idiots. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 14:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
|}

== ] ==

] / ]: "Categories regarding sexual orientation of a living person should not be used unless the subject has publicly '''self-identified''' with the belief or orientation in question".<br/>
Also, ] says "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing". ] • ] 19:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

{{Tb|Edenc1|Reply}}

==Personal attacks==
Regardless of the merit of your arguments, you are again resorting to edit-warring and personal attacks in edit summaries (such as ) as opposed to pursuing ]. Note if it continues you will very likely be blocked again. As your last block was for a month I'm sure you can find it within yourself to discuss the ] article on the talk page or via ] as opposed to arguing and calling others who disagree with you "stupid" via edit summaries? --]<sup>]</sup> 20:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

== M Dallas ==

hi - As per ] - please do not replace again w/o discussion and ] support, discussion is at ] - thanks - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 21:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

== Broken City ==

{{talkback|Talk:Broken City (film)|Cast}}

==Disambiguation link notification for January 26==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

== Jodie Foster ==


Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
You cannot add the LGBT cat to this BLP per consensus at the BLP notice board. ] (]) 19:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
:Please do not restore the LGBT to the Foster article, per the consensus ] (]) 15:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
== ] ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 19:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
I think the ] page is wrong. The BBC source cited there doesn't actually give a date whereas the Guardian obit (which actually is cited in the Sophia Haque article) does. I will take this to ].--] (]) 17:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


==Concern regarding ]==
== Scjessy ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
Hi, sorry, but isn't acceptable. ]&nbsp;<sup>]] ]]</sup> 17:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
:That is an personalized and borderline personal attack not suitable for the article talk namespace. You put it on his user talk page, he read it, then removed it. Drop the stick; this is a last warning. Regards, ]&nbsp;<sup>]] ]]</sup> 17:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.


==Concern regarding ]==
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Rowan Blanchard|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> -- ] ] 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
==Disambiguation link notification for February 2==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


==Concern regarding ]==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== Thanks for the larf! ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 05:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
.


==Concern regarding ]==
== Please don't remove plot flaws ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
There are people out there who care about the mistakes Doug made on ] and ]. People who haven't seen the movie wouldn't want to be misinformed now would they? ] (]) 19:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 06:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
==Your multiple removals of a valid red link==
You removed the then-red link for ] two times in ], using the reason "unsightly" and then citing the info page ]. Neither of those reasons were valid as they are contrary to ], which overrides an info page and clearly instructs that "a valid red link term...should not be dealt with by removing the link brackets, simply to temporarily reduce the amount of red text in an article." Further, it was the ''only'' red link in the entire article. More importantly, REDDEAL points out that "a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article". Wiseman not only has a role in a major network TV program, he has also acted in over 60 other TV programs, which you were told. Therefore, it was unquestionably ''plausible'' that he could sustain his own article. In fact, he now does have his own article. As well, your use of WP:BRD was a complete misapplication; it is only to be used, if ever, ''after'' a thorough attempt at resolving the matter through discussion on the article's talk page has taken place. There ''was'' no discussion and you made no attempt to start one. That info page also states, "BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring". All of this was explained in the edit summaries, yet you inexplicably ignored them and chose to revert mulitple times. ] summarizes why it's important to have valid red links: "Good red links help Misplaced Pages—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that ]." In the future, please do not invoke invalid reasons for reverting someone's edits, disregard clear guidelines and policies, or ignore valid edit summaries. --] (]) 00:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:30, 22 December 2024



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Concern regarding Draft:Batso

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Batso, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Days Gone (film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Days Gone (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is for your tireless contributions to Deaths in 2024. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Fairy Tale

Thanks for getting in touch. Sure, yes makes sense. Best, G Hildreth gazzard (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Ploughmen

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ploughmen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bitter Root

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bitter Root, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Denys Graham

Hi @Rusted AutoParts:, I've restored Denys Graham to the Deaths in 2024 page. Firstly, your assessment of the source "feeling a bit bloggy"... If you take a look at the home page of the website, it's abundantly clear that it's an organisation for professional actors: "Actors & Writers London (AWL) is London’s longest-running professional play-reading forum for actors and writers. It was established in 1973 at Hammersmith’s Riverside Studios and was known as Hammersmith Actors and Writers Group until July 2004." I can't see any evidence of it being a personal blog of any kind. Secondly, if you're unsure of a source and want to discuss it – and it's not one that has been previously ruled out – we have the talk section of Deaths in 2024 for that. Thanks Jkaharper (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Queen Of Fashion

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Queen Of Fashion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tokyo Ghost (film)

Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tokyo Ghost".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 22:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Invite

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Invite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Legacy.com

Hi there. I saw your update to the death date at Mike Haffner. I started a related discussion at Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § Conflicting death dates on Legacy.com that you're invited to join. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:10's regeneration.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10's regeneration.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Exit West (film)

Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Exit West".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 19:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Frank Bullitt film

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Frank Bullitt film, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Blood Runs Coal

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blood Runs Coal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fools (upcoming film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fools (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Billy Summers (film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Billy Summers (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)