Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/American Gaming Association: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:34, 17 February 2013 editDegenFarang (talk \| contribs)2,116 edits ←Created page with 'No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. ~~~~'		Latest revision as of 07:51, 5 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(14 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''speedy keep'''. The nominator actually failed to provide an argument for deletion and questionable ] has been resolved with the addition of ] here, numerous from just today at Google News, so it obviously passes ]. (]) <span style="font-family:Impact;">]</span> <sup>(])</sup> 19:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
			===]===

			:{{la\|American Gaming Association}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
			:({{Find sources\|American Gaming Association}})
	No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. ] (]) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)		No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. ] (]) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' and ] the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to ] on the part of the nominator. ] (]) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
			*'''Speedy keep'''. Ludicrous hounding nomination. today. ] (]) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' per 2005 and Vegaswikian above. ] (]) 20:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			*If we stubify the article and remove all of the spam, I would be willing to change my vote to Keep. ] (]) 21:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			::You might consider editing and improving articles ''before'' sending them to Afd. Generally speaking, if an article can be improved, it isn't eligible for deletion. ] (]) 12:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
			*''''Speedy Keep''' Nom is no longer arguing for deletion. ] (]) 15:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
			*'''Note''': This debate was never properly listed on the log. I have put it onto the current AFD log at 18:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC).—] (]) 18:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 07:51, 5 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator actually failed to provide an argument for deletion and questionable notability has been resolved with the addition of reliable sources here, numerous from just today at Google News, so it obviously passes requirements. (non-admin closure) TBrandley 19:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

American Gaming Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, likely created by the source of the article or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep and trout slap the above editor! This is the major gaming industry association in the US. Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Neither is a failure to assume good faith on the part of the nominator. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Ludicrous hounding nomination. 146 google news mentions today. 2005 (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep per 2005 and Vegaswikian above. Rray (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
If we stubify the article and remove all of the spam, I would be willing to change my vote to Keep. DegenFarang (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

You might consider editing and improving articles before sending them to Afd. Generally speaking, if an article can be improved, it isn't eligible for deletion. Rray (talk) 12:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

'Speedy Keep Nom is no longer arguing for deletion. Toohool (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate was never properly listed on the log. I have put it onto the current AFD log at 18:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC).—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.