| Revision as of 18:41, 24 February 2013 editEurisarukovci (talk | contribs)144 edits reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:02, 23 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed invalid span tag and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | ||
| Hi '''Eurisarukovci'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (]) | Hi '''Eurisarukovci'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (]) | ||
| <div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small |
<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small>This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, ] (]) 01:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :Hello, I'm a new user, and I took part in a project with wikiacademy to add as much information about Kosovo. I did a lot of research and wanted to make the timeline as good as I could. The references that I had gave me this information. However, I was just told that I should have just added on the existing timeline or should have talked to you from the beginning. I have a lot of information I think would be useful to the Timeline. Would it be all right if I just incorporated the timeline that I created into the existing one? Any changes you think should be made are of course welcome. | :Hello, I'm a new user, and I took part in a project with wikiacademy to add as much information about Kosovo. I did a lot of research and wanted to make the timeline as good as I could. The references that I had gave me this information. However, I was just told that I should have just added on the existing timeline or should have talked to you from the beginning. I have a lot of information I think would be useful to the Timeline. Would it be all right if I just incorporated the timeline that I created into the existing one? Any changes you think should be made are of course welcome. | ||
| ::Thanks for your reply. Yes, you were wrong. You should not remove the text of the existing timeline. Nor it would not be allright to incorporate the timeline that you created into the existing one because it has important flaws. Please try to first resolve some issues I pointed at and then propose the draft on the talkpage.--] (]) 21:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Would you please restore the Serbian rulers, as I have not researched and studied that information yet. As for " Territories which are Albanian 600 years before Albanians were mentioned for the first time" could point out where you think those flaws are made and I will provide more references by worldwide authors. As for the buildings (Churches and mosques along other things), maybe we could create a sort of 'building timeline' (loosely phrased, but you probably get the idea) and incorporate all the material in another article. My opinion is that it doesn't really belong in a "historical" timeline per se... What do you think? Thank you! Cheers and may we make this timeline as educative and complete as we can! :)<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:12, 25 February 2013</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| :::No, Eurisarukovci was not wrong, and your assertion to that effect is challenged on the article talk page. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 22:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:02, 23 January 2022
Eurisarukovci, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Eurisarukovci! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
New user?
Hi,
Are you new user or returning old one?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm a new user, and I took part in a project with wikiacademy to add as much information about Kosovo. I did a lot of research and wanted to make the timeline as good as I could. The references that I had gave me this information. However, I was just told that I should have just added on the existing timeline or should have talked to you from the beginning. I have a lot of information I think would be useful to the Timeline. Would it be all right if I just incorporated the timeline that I created into the existing one? Any changes you think should be made are of course welcome.
- Thanks for your reply. Yes, you were wrong. You should not remove the text of the existing timeline. Nor it would not be allright to incorporate the timeline that you created into the existing one because it has important flaws. Please try to first resolve some issues I pointed at and then propose the draft on the talkpage.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Would you please restore the Serbian rulers, as I have not researched and studied that information yet. As for " Territories which are Albanian 600 years before Albanians were mentioned for the first time" could point out where you think those flaws are made and I will provide more references by worldwide authors. As for the buildings (Churches and mosques along other things), maybe we could create a sort of 'building timeline' (loosely phrased, but you probably get the idea) and incorporate all the material in another article. My opinion is that it doesn't really belong in a "historical" timeline per se... What do you think? Thank you! Cheers and may we make this timeline as educative and complete as we can! :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurisarukovci (talk • contribs) 22:12, 25 February 2013
- No, Eurisarukovci was not wrong, and your assertion to that effect is challenged on the article talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Yes, you were wrong. You should not remove the text of the existing timeline. Nor it would not be allright to incorporate the timeline that you created into the existing one because it has important flaws. Please try to first resolve some issues I pointed at and then propose the draft on the talkpage.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)