| Revision as of 08:29, 3 March 2013 view sourceApteva (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,591 edits →Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015 view source Jehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Neotarf: User request within own user space ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (417 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Retired}} | |||
| {{banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement == | |||
| {{noindex}} | |||
| Per ], please refrain from personalizing discussions. There are hundreds of RFC/U's. Adding "There was one for Apteva." is completely unnecessary, and completely inappropriate. "Er, shouldn't there be an RFC/U or something? There was one for Apteva." —Neotarf (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC) ] (]) 08:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015