| Revision as of 12:44, 12 March 2013 view sourceWorm That Turned (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators25,701 edits Unblocked by the Arbitration Committee← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:15, 12 October 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2024) (bot | ||
| (899 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| ==Unblocked by the Arbitration Committee== | |||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |||
| {{Ivmbox|1=On 21 July 2012, Fæ was blocked indefinitely and restricted to one account as a result of ]. In February 2013, Fæ appealed his block to the Arbitration Committee, declaring his past accounts. The Arbitration Committee accepts his appeal, on the following conditions: | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| # Fæ is topic banned from editing BLPs relating to sexuality, broadly construed | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| # Fæ is topic banned from images relating to sexuality, broadly construed | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| Fæ may appeal these topic bans after 1 year. }} | |||
| |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | |||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{archivebox|{{center|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}|search=no|bot=}} | |||
| {{notice|image=Faebot logo.png|When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. {{=)}} Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking.}} | |||
| {{Off and On WikiBreak}} | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| * Supporting motion: Carcharoth, Coren, David Fuchs, Nuclear Warfare, Newyorkbrad, Risker, Silk Tork, Worm That Turned (proposing) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * Opposing: Courcelles | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| * Not voting: Roger Davies, Timotheus Canens | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| * Inactive: Hersfold | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| * Recused: AGK, Salvio guiliano, Kirill Lokshin | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| I have unblocked your account, but remind you that along with the two new topic bans, your earlier restriction to a single account remains in effect. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 12:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:15, 12 October 2024
 Archives |
|
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email.  Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
 | Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Good article reassessment for Burney Relief
Burney Relief has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Clare Dimyon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Dimyon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clare Dimyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.