| Revision as of 21:09, 14 March 2013 editJokestress (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,851 edits →Cantor: add another notable pattern← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 15:32, 25 April 2013 edit undoNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,664 edits ←Replaced content with '__NOINDEX__ {{ombox |image= |text= This page has been blanked as a courtesy. Th...' |
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
__NOINDEX__ |
|
David Fuchs' ] about our editing outside sexology. |
|
|
|
{{ombox |image= |text= This page has been ]] The ]'s decision is still in effect, and can be viewed in the . |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
==Jokestress== |
|
|
My 49,000+ edits cover the full range of Misplaced Pages topics and are rarely disputed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Of 2,100+ articles I created, at least 50 (~2%) are Sexology articles, including |
|
|
|
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps 10 of those (~0.5%) have been substantively challenged (all by Cantor) and resolved via talk pages, including |
|
|
*] - Cantor helped suppress a '']'' article by ] and a book by ] via tag team consensus because they mentioned eugenics |
|
|
*] - Cantor attempted to get this competing conceptualization deleted |
|
|
*] (total rewrite) - Cantor attempted to get this competing conceptualization deleted |
|
|
*] - Cantor colleague |
|
|
*] - Cantor colleague |
|
|
*] - Cantor colleague |
|
|
*] - Cantor colleague |
|
|
*] - Cantor colleague's book |
|
|
Though I believe my edits on the whole were fair and neutral, I acknowledge a COI on those edits in 2005-2009. None of these have been substantively edited by either of us since 2009 by mutual agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
I've authored many articles on '''Canadian sex researchers''' that stand unchallenged: |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
I've even authored articles on '''Canadian CAMH sex researchers''' that have stood unchallenged: |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
Challenges only arise during James Cantor's COI editing / self-promotion. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Cantor== |
|
|
Few edits unrelated to Sexology/self-promotion. |
|
|
Of outside edits, three notable behaviors: |
|
|
*Challenging the notability of prominent transgender people and organizations (none of which I've ever edited): |
|
|
:*] |
|
|
:*] |
|
|
:*] |
|
|
:*] |
|
|
|
|
|
*Trying to delete articles simply because I created them |
|
|
|
|
|
*In 2013 Cantor began promoting views of other allies outside sexology. Cantor's frequent ally Alice Dreger attacked a critic of ] named ]. Dreger is the same person who attacked me in a journal Cantor helps edit. Cantor began shaping aspects of Diamond's biography to match Dreger's POV in this series of edits: As in his edits to my biography, uninvolved editors reverted his changes as biased. |
|
|
|
|
|
:I have been completely uninvolved at Diamond/Tierney, but the pattern of Cantor's disputes with other editors over slanted content is the same. If there is a topic ban at sexology for him, I believe this new pattern will also require monitoring. ] (]) 21:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Other editors== |
|
|
] and ] are excellent editors outside of sexology. Like me, they have never been blocked. |
|
|
|
|
|
] and ] are generally good editors, though their conduct has led to conflicts and blocks. They get too emotionally invested in some topics, most notably sexology. |
|
