| Revision as of 22:15, 21 May 2006 editElkman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,323 edits Something that'll just be ignored anyway← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:12, 23 January 2007 edit undoBetacommand (talk | contribs)86,927 editsm Unprotected User talk:Dot Bitch: removing old protection | ||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <font size="5">'''Dot Bitch Bitch Session'''</font> | |||
| <font size="3">Please leave all bitches on my page. or any non bitch thing you want to leave. Thanks for bitching or not. Dot Bitch</font> | |||
| ] | |||
| == Hey the Bitch has a question == | |||
| Can somebody tell me why the cross is black in all the articles about Chrisianity and the one about Jesus. It makes it look evil and this really bothers me. Thanks for bitching here. Dot Bitch | |||
| == Signature == | |||
| Put four tildes in a row, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, and it will insert your signature and the time. That's how most people sign pages. If you want, I can help you customize your signature. As for Esperanza, just keep editing and being constructive, and you'll be able to join before you know it. Happy editing! - '''<font color="#003399">]</font>'' '''<sup><font color="#009933">]</font></sup>'' 07:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Indefinite username block== | ==Indefinite username block== | ||
| Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it is inappropriate (see our ] for more information). If it hadn't been, I would have blocked this account as a likely sock of Thewolfstar, see . You are not encouraged to choose yet another name and keep circling round Thewolfstar's interests, habits, and acquaintances, as the Dot Bitch account immediately does. But I do encourage you to choose a new username and edit constructively from it. If you avoid the mistakes of Thewolfstar, especially in editing the articles in her typical fields of interest, make a fresh start, and edit harmlessly, you are welcome as a wikipedian. ] | ] 14:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC). | Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it is inappropriate (see our ] for more information). If it hadn't been, I would have blocked this account as a likely sock of Thewolfstar, see . You are not encouraged to choose yet another name and keep circling round Thewolfstar's interests, habits, and acquaintances, as the Dot Bitch account immediately does. But I do encourage you to choose a new username and edit constructively from it. If you avoid the mistakes of Thewolfstar, especially in editing the articles in her typical fields of interest, make a fresh start, and edit harmlessly, you are welcome as a wikipedian. ] | ] 14:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC). | ||
| :Bishonen, You said "''But I do encourage you to choose a new username and edit constructively from it. If you avoid the mistakes of Thewolfstar, especially in editing the articles in her typical fields of interest, make a fresh start, and edit harmlessly, you are welcome as a wikipedian.''" | |||
| :Is this a promise? I am not being a wiseguy here. I am only asking for another chance. If I can get another chance through your suggestion, I will gladly take it. I am not accusing you or anyone of anything. I only want some sort of assurance that I will be allowed to edit here at Misplaced Pages if I show that I can edit constructively and do not PA anyone. Thewolfstar did edit constructively but did some pretty viscious PA on some editors, this is true. I am saying that I will not make viscious attacks on ''anyone''. I agree that this is not the way to act, as :it is hurtful. I don't want to hurt any editor here or any person anywhere. Also, are you saying when I create this new account that I can never talk to any of my former acquaintances like Corbin? Again, I am not being a wiseguy. I just am not sure if I understand what you are saying. I like Esperanza and would like to join it when :and if I can. A couple of thewolfstar's friends were members of Esperanza, (] and ] and some editors thewolfstar liked like ]) | |||
| * Will the new user I create be ''ever'' be allowed to contribute to political articles, even ''after'' proving to be useful to Misplaced Pages? | |||
| *If I show that I can edit constructively, etc., can I resume my original username thewolfstar? | |||
| =Protected= | |||
| :Thanks for the kind offer, Bishonen.<br> | |||
| :I sincerely appreciate it.''Maggie'' who is truly not a ]. But in all honesty is ] 20:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC). | |||
| Page protected as per . Plenty of good advice has been given to this user, she has chosen not to take any of it. --] (]) 13:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Since you still don't get it...== | |||
| As far as my opinion goes, I don't think Misplaced Pages is a good project for you. No, let me rephrase that in more blunt terms: As {{vandal|thewolfstar}}, you did a lot of damage to Misplaced Pages because of your persistently abusive messages in user talk and article talk. Between you and {{vandal|nathanrdotcom}}, you did SO much damage to ] that a number of good people left. I was forced out because of the {{vandal|nathanrdotcom}} fiasco, but even if I hadn't been, I was seriously thinking about quitting because you spent so much time abusing Esperanza's mechanisms and programs to suit your own needs. I was embarrassed to be part of the same organization as you when you displayed so much unkindness to people. | |||
| ==Attack page blanked== | |||
| Frankly, you need to understand what it means to have exhausted the community's patience. And rather than taking a lesson from what people have been trying to say to you '''over and over again''', you keep claiming that you're going to change your behavior -- but you don't. And frankly, I don't know why you keep coming back to this site to edit and to antagonize people. Maybe if you took a long WikiBreak and think about what you've done, you might cure these problems for the next time. --{{vandal|Elkman}} 22:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| My apologies to the community for having inadvertently enabled yet another soapbox/attack page for indefinitely banned user Thewolfstar by engaging in dialogue with her sock Dot Bitch on this page. I assumed too much good faith, and Thewolfstar took advantage of it to hold forth on the usual Thewolfstar subjects, to make specific accusations against individual users while ''ignoring evidence posted that the accusations are untrue'' and for personal attacks and lawyering. I won't be caught that way again. I advise any admin who's tempted to extend good faith to '''any''' incarnation of Thewolfstar to take a look at the development of this page first. It's instructive, and it's all in the History. ] | ] 14:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC). | |||
Latest revision as of 18:12, 23 January 2007
Indefinite username block
Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it is inappropriate (see our blocking policy for more information). If it hadn't been, I would have blocked this account as a likely sock of Thewolfstar, see this CheckUser assessment. You are not encouraged to choose yet another name and keep circling round Thewolfstar's interests, habits, and acquaintances, as the Dot Bitch account immediately does. But I do encourage you to choose a new username and edit constructively from it. If you avoid the mistakes of Thewolfstar, especially in editing the articles in her typical fields of interest, make a fresh start, and edit harmlessly, you are welcome as a wikipedian. Bishonen | talk 14:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC).
Protected
Page protected as per request. Plenty of good advice has been given to this user, she has chosen not to take any of it. --ajn (talk) 13:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Attack page blanked
My apologies to the community for having inadvertently enabled yet another soapbox/attack page for indefinitely banned user Thewolfstar by engaging in dialogue with her sock Dot Bitch on this page. I assumed too much good faith, and Thewolfstar took advantage of it to hold forth on the usual Thewolfstar subjects, to make specific accusations against individual users while ignoring evidence posted that the accusations are untrue and for personal attacks and lawyering. I won't be caught that way again. I advise any admin who's tempted to extend good faith to any incarnation of Thewolfstar to take a look at the development of this page first. It's instructive, and it's all in the History. Bishonen | talk 14:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC).