Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:08, 23 May 2006 editEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits Harry Potter Edit War: Remove notice after a week← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:35, 12 November 2018 edit undoRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits rdr to mainTag: New redirect 
(820 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{/Backlog}}
<br />
{{/Rfm-header}} <!-- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header -->
<br style="clear:both;">
==Instructions==
'''New requests should be listed at , right below the template sample. All requests must use the template provided below.'''

*] provides an explanation for how to file a request.
*] shows the template with instructions.
*] has a description of common reasons for rejecting requests.

'''All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected.''' Please watch this page during the time the case is listed here; if additional information is required, you will be asked here, and expected to respond within the 7 day period.

== Case name (Sample)==
----
<center><big>Do not edit this section! Copy the text of this section into another section and edit that.<br />Edits to this section will be reverted immediately.</big></center>
----
===Involved parties===
*{{user|Example}}
*{{user|Example}}

'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''
Provide diffs showing where {{tl|RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{tl|RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*]

:'''User talk pages:'''
:*]

===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
*] link
*] discussion

===Issues to be mediated===
*Issue 1
*Issue 2

===Additional issues to be mediated===
*Additional issue 1
*Additional issue 2

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
*Agree.

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' (Mediation Committee members only.)
----
<center><big>Your case should look just like this when you have finished filing;</br>no commentary, no extra information, just what is required in this template.<br />'''If you choose to ignore these instructions, your case will likewise be ignored. ].'''</big></center>
----
==New Requests==
<center><big>'''New requests immediately below this line.'''</big></center>
<!-- New requests immediately below this line. -->
==Usage of the actual term "]" by WP editors ==
----
===Involved parties===
*{{user|Irishpunktom}}
*{{user|Netscott}}
*{{user|Raphael1}}
*{{user|Karl Meier}}

'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''


:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*]

:'''User talk pages:'''
:*]
:*]
:*]

===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
*]
*]
*]

===Issues to be mediated===
*Counter to the ] guidelines should the article be written while actually ''utilizing'' the "islamophobia" ] outside of quotes and citations?

===Additional issues to be mediated===
*In respect to this neologism's status should it have an ''Examples of use in public discourse'' section (similar to the ]) article as it does in or not, as in ?

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
*Agree. ] 17:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree on the condition that Irishpunktom end his personal attacks and name-calling against me. It doesn't make any sense, and it will not be possible to discuss any such serious matters without some basic civility, and seen in the light of the very recent and very serious NPA violations, this will have to be agreed to by Irishpunktom for me to accept and spend time on any such mediation. -- ] 17:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

:We don't take conditional accepts; you have to either agree or disagree. You may propose conditions as a part of your continued participation once the mediation is accepted, but anything other than "Agree" is considered to be a refusal to take part. See the instructions on ]: ''Only signatures should go here, along with either "Agree" or "Do not agree." Any additional comments will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee.'' Please indicate stright agreement, or disagreement. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] <font color="#7b68ee">(<small>] • ]</small>)</font></span> 01:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' (Mediation Committee members only.)
----

== ] (in progress)==
===Involved parties===
*{{user|Bless sins}}
*{{user|Pecher}}
*{{user|Karl Meier}}
*{{user|Amibidhrohi}}
*{{user|Tickle me}}
*{{user|Timothy Usher}}
*{{user|Zeq}}
*{{user|Aminz}}

'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*]

===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
*] talk page discussion

===Issues to be mediated===
*Should the article include the rules of war outlined in the ]?

===Additional issues to be mediated===

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
*Agree. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. ] 19:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. ] 20:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. ] 23:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===



== Tatu vs t.A.T.u. ==
{{/Format|01:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)}}

== Kven users POV ==
===Involved parties===
*{{user|Fred chessplayer}}
*{{user|Mikkalai}}
*{{user|Big Adamsky}}
*{{user|217.30.179.130}} (a.k.a {{user|130.234.75.183}})
*{{user|Digi Wiki}} (a.k.a. {{user|Art Dominique}}, {{user|Drow Ssap}}, {{user|Ppt}}, etc)


'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''
Provide diffs showing where {{tl|RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{tl|RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*]
:*]
:*]

:'''User talk pages:'''
:*]
:*]
:*]
:*]

===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
*] link
*]
* ]
* ]
* ]


===Issues to be mediated===
*User Digi Wiki's refusal to accept consensus to ]-related articles

===Additional issues to be mediated===
*User Digi Wiki's general behaviour: the use of multiple sock puppets, using them to appear to be several users, abusive behaviour, abuse of talk pages.
*The insistence on conflating two separate but related topics into one messy discussion on one of them. To wit: The historical term "kven" refers to a group of people around the Baltic Sea; these may or may not be the descendants to contemporary kvens, an ethnic minority in the north of Norway. These should be separate articles, as only one topic is actually controversial. --] 23:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

::<small>I assume you mean "ancestors", not "descendants". ] 09:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC) </small>

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
*Agree. ]-] 15:46, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. `'] ] 17:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree, although I do not promise to participate very actively in future discussions.] 15:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC) (aka 217.130.xxx.xxx).

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' (Mediation Committee members only.)

==Conduct of users==
{{/Rejected|01:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)}}

== Sonic the Hedgehog etc ==
{{/Rejected|01:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)}}

== Anti-Americanism ==

===Involved parties===
*{{user|Christinam}}
*{{user|Marskell}}
*{{user|Rkrichbaum}}
*{{user|Tfine80}}
'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*]

:'''User talk pages:'''
:*]
:*] (posting request)
:*]
:*]

===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
* Massive discussions on ] that are leading nowhere.
* Two disinterested admins contacted: . The first was reverted when he attempted to intervene on the page

===Issues to be mediated===
* Two alternate and essentially incompatible intros are being reverted over.
* Secondarily, does picture of Guantanamo Bay belong? ] 17:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)]

===Additional issues to be mediated===

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
* Agree. ] 17:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree.

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''':
::''For the Mediation Committee,''



== Neo-Tech ==
===Involved parties===
*{{user|RJII}}
*{{user|Bi}}

'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*'''User talk pages:'''
:*===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
*

===Issues to be mediated===
*This concerns the article, ]. Bi claims that books published by Integrated Management Associates (a company that publishes material about a philosophy called Neo-Tech) cannot be used as references for the article about Neo-Tech ("''Incidentally, the rules also say that "self-published books" are unacceptable as sources. Well, I think I'm going to throw out lots of stuff that come only from Neo-Tech's self-publications. Bi 10:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)''"), which is bizarre becase it's the only sources on the philosophy. Lest there be any doubt, ] plainly says: ''Self-published sources, and published sources of dubious reliability, may be used only as sources of information on themselves, and only in articles about them. For example, the Stormfront website may be used as a source of information on itself in an article about Stormfront, so long as the information is notable, not unduly self-aggrandizing, and not contradicted by reliable, third-party published sources. Self-published sources may never be used as sources of information on another person or topic.'' Of course you can use the books as sources about the philosophy, in the article about the philosophy! Otherwise, the article would be blank! (As an aside, I'd like to note that the company also publishes the work of other writers not associated with the company as well). Also, he sources "criticism" of Neo-Tech from web forums, self-published web pages, etc rather than from credible published sources. He expressed a desire for form dispute resolution, as have I. Please assist enforcing the Misplaced Pages policies on sourcing. It should be pretty simple and straightforward to mediate this. Thank you. ] 01:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

===Additional issues to be mediated===
*Thank you. In addition to being self-published, the Neo-Tech literature can be considered to be "unduly self-aggrandizing", which ] does not allow. Besides, given that Neo-Tech literature is self-published and self-aggrandizing, it would seem unfair to use a different standard for admitting views opposed to Neo-Tech. ] 06:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
*Agree. ] 03:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. ] 06:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''':
::''For the Mediation Committee,''

*'''Chairman's note:''' ''Recuse'' from involvement. Another member of the committee will need to accept/reject the case and assign a mediator. <span style="font-family:Sans serif">] <font color="#7b68ee">(<small>] • ]</small>)</font></span> 06:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

==Archives==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Archives}}

]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:35, 12 November 2018

Redirect to: