| Revision as of 21:58, 22 March 2013 view sourceStAnselm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers160,624 edits Warning: Edit warring on Douglas Wilson (theologian). (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:42, 25 May 2022 view source MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (43 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired}} | |||
| == Re-use the sources == | |||
| ⚫ | == Blocked: April 2013 == | ||
| Hi, I added one of the citations for ] to the page ]. I think it is appropriate in terms of ]. Hope this helps. – ] '''<font color="#FF0000">]</font>'''] 13:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Per a ] discussion located I have blocked this account indefinitely. There are multiple reasons for this block as discussed in the root thread of that proposal. The conclusion is that the entirety of your editing is classified as ]. If you wish to contest this block you can find resources at ] and ]. I will find an appropriate template that provides further information and post it shortly. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 06:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Good. Thanks.] (]) 22:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
| Note: Any administrator is fully welcome to modify this block at their discretion or via. a consensus by the community. I feel no more ] towards my administrative actions than one should about their edits. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 06:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Dispute Resolution Noticeboard == | |||
| :I'd like to make sure that Yeoberry understands that the block is for the '''''person''''', not the account, and that while blocked he is not allowed to edit using an IP. ] (]) 17:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeoberry, you cannot remove block notices relating to current sanctions from your talk page. This is covered under ]. If you do continue to remove your talk page access will be revoked. --]] 18:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I'm a regular volunteer there. I reverted your listing because all listings there must be made via the button at the top of the page so that the maintenance bot that runs the page will work correctly. '''However,''' what you are requesting is a conduct dispute and DRN does not handle those. You need to go to ] for that. Regards, ] (]) 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors  according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]] (]) 21:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:42, 25 May 2022
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Blocked: April 2013
Per a unanimous discussion located here I have blocked this account indefinitely. There are multiple reasons for this block as discussed in the root thread of that proposal. The conclusion is that the entirety of your editing is classified as disruptive. If you wish to contest this block you can find resources at WP:UNBLOCK and Misplaced Pages:Appealing a block. I will find an appropriate template that provides further information and post it shortly. — Ched : ? 06:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Note: Any administrator is fully welcome to modify this block at their discretion or via. a consensus by the community. I feel no more ownership towards my administrative actions than one should about their edits. — Ched : ? 06:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'd like to make sure that Yeoberry understands that the block is for the person, not the account, and that while blocked he is not allowed to edit using an IP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeoberry, you cannot remove block notices relating to current sanctions from your talk page. This is covered under WP:BLANKING. If you do continue to remove your talk page access will be revoked. --Jezebel'sPonyo 18:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)