Revision as of 12:53, 26 March 2013 editMarshalN20 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,094 edits →Parties' agreement to mediation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:12, 10 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| parties = | | parties = | ||
| opened = 26 Mar 2013 | | opened = 26 Mar 2013 | ||
| status = |
| status = rejected | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
''All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to ] your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.'' | ''All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to ] your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.'' | ||
#Agree. ] (]) 11:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | #Agree. ] (]) 11:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#Decline. See ]. Best regards.--] | ] 12:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | #Decline. See ]. Best regards.--] | ] 12:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
# | # | ||
#Decline. There is an ongoing Arbitration Request on this same topic at ]. Lecen should not haven open this request yet, both cases would overlap. If the Arbcom closes the case instructing for a mediation, then this mediation may be requested again. ] (]) 00:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
====Decision of the Mediation Committee==== | ====Decision of the Mediation Committee==== | ||
''A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be ] or ]. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.'' | ''A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be ] or ]. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.'' | ||
*Considering the majority of editors have declined, this is an obvious reject. Also, the ArbCom request mentioned by Cambalachero has been accepted. ] (]) 02:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
<!--MedComSCRIPT-Do-Not-Remove-Or-Change-This-Line-CLOSECOMMENT--> | <!--MedComSCRIPT-Do-Not-Remove-Or-Change-This-Line-CLOSECOMMENT--> | ||
<!-- Do not remove or edit this category. It is essential to the case management bot. --> | <!-- Do not remove or edit this category. It is essential to the case management bot. --> | ||
{{Medcombox/bottom}}<noinclude>]</noinclude> | {{Medcombox/bottom}}<noinclude>]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 22:12, 10 February 2023
Argentine history on Misplaced Pages
Formal mediation case | |
---|---|
Article | Argentine history on Misplaced Pages (talk) |
Opened | 26 Mar 2013 |
Mediator | Not yet assigned |
Status | Rejected |
Notes | None |
- Users involved in dispute
- Lecen (talk · contribs), filing party
- Cambalachero (talk · contribs)
- MarshalN20 (talk · contribs)
- Articles concerned in this dispute
- Juan Manuel de Rosas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sociedad Popular Restauradora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Historiography of Juan Manuel de Rosas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Blood tables (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Other steps of dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas (for a general view)
- Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas#Third opinion (WP:3O)
- Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas#RfC: Use of Nationalist/Revisionist sources on Juan Manuel de Rosas (RfC)
- Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Juan Manuel de Rosas (failed mediation)
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Argentine History
Issues to be mediated
- Primary issues
- Are Argentine Nationalist/Revisionist authors acceptable as sources on Misplaced Pages?
- If yes, on what proportion should their views be presented?
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
- Agree. Lecen (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Decline. See Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for mediation/Argentine history on Misplaced Pages. Best regards.--MarshalN20 | 12:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Decline. There is an ongoing Arbitration Request on this same topic at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Argentine History. Lecen should not haven open this request yet, both cases would overlap. If the Arbcom closes the case instructing for a mediation, then this mediation may be requested again. Cambalachero (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
- Considering the majority of editors have declined, this is an obvious reject. Also, the ArbCom request mentioned by Cambalachero has been accepted. PhilKnight (talk) 02:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)