| Revision as of 19:04, 31 March 2013 editHumanpublic (talk | contribs)343 edits →We all look alike← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:42, 28 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (86 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Warning== | |||
| is shockingly bad advice. I don't know any of the context of this, and just found the page while looking at unblock requests. but advising someone to create sockpuppets to avoid a topic ban seems, on its surface, to be a really, ''really'' bad idea. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 16:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| '''This user believes in the project and is disgusted by ]. As a consequence, she sees sock puppetry as justifiable in certain cases.''' | |||
| :What about not "on its surface"? ] (]) 21:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::I can't think of ''any'' time when advising someone else to break the rules that way would be a good idea. If you think that this person has been unfairly treated, the better thing to do would be making a strong case at ] that the topic ban was unreasonable and should be lifted. It's never a good idea to goad someone into actions that would certainly lead to a permanent block for them. Even if your''goal'' is that this person should be permanently blocked, it reflects badly on you to push them into it. A person who is not going to be a beneficial part of Misplaced Pages will eventually make that clear and be indefinitely blocked without any nudging. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 23:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : Well, this is a quick way to get an indefinite block. <span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:Purple;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup>]</sup> 22:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::So, you can't think of something that I can think of. We haven't found a common ground. I have no faith in ANI. ] (]) | |||
| ::::I came here to comment on the same bit of extremely bad advice, and completely agree with FisherQueen in this matter. I urge you to return to Humanpublic's talk page and retract your comment. If your intention is to help another editor, urging them to violate ] is certainly not the sort of "help" they need. Regards —] (]) 15:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::...and I have so much to lose, you know, the feeling of respect I get from this community... ] (]) 16:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==We all look alike== | |||
| :Have you seen my (soon to be rejected) arbitration request? They think all atheists think the same. We are all part of a vast hate-driven conspiracy to attack Christianity. ] (]) 04:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for intentional violation of topic ban. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] (]) 17:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
| I'll take a look. They've upped my hours at work, so I have less time for Misplaced Pages now. ] (]) 15:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Echo (elephant)== | |||
| :OK. Will you be at the Meetup this month? ] (]) 19:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that scientists observed ''']''' which lasted 65 years?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Echo (elephant)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Echo (elephant)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], , )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I hope you still check in occasionally. The hook for your article did very well; with its April Fools' Day appearance, plus a little "spillover" the next day, it received over 8000 page views. Thanks again for writing the article which helped to create a successful day for DYK. I'm sorry to see how things have worked out for you here. Hopefully some day you can successfully appeal your block and resume editing. ] <span style="color:blue">•</span> ] 08:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:42, 28 February 2023
This user believes in the project and is disgusted by the community. As a consequence, she sees sock puppetry as justifiable in certain cases.
- Well, this is a quick way to get an indefinite block. Liz 22:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newjerseyliz (talk • contribs)
- ...and I have so much to lose, you know, the feeling of respect I get from this community... Strangesad (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Echo (elephant)
 | On 1 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Echo (elephant), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that scientists observed an echo which lasted 65 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Echo (elephant). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- I hope you still check in occasionally. The hook for your article did very well; with its April Fools' Day appearance, plus a little "spillover" the next day, it received over 8000 page views. Thanks again for writing the article which helped to create a successful day for DYK. I'm sorry to see how things have worked out for you here. Hopefully some day you can successfully appeal your block and resume editing. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)