Misplaced Pages

:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 May 23: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:05, 24 May 2006 editSjakkalle (talk | contribs)Administrators33,817 edits →[]: Keep vote← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:06, 20 December 2022 edit undoSheep8144402 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers33,719 editsm fix linter errors using AWBTag: AWB 
(59 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 1px 0 0; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; font-size:10px"> <noinclude><div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 1px 0 0; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; font-size:10px">
{| width = "100%" {| width = "100%"
|- |-
! width="50%" align="left" | <font color="gray">&lt;</font> ] ! style="width:50%; text-align:left;" | <span style="color:gray;">&lt;</span> ]
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <font color="gray">&gt;</font> ! style="width:50%; text-align:right;" | ] <span style="color:gray;">&gt;</span>
|} |}
</div></noinclude> </div></noinclude>
=== May 23, 2006 === === May 23, 2006 ===
<!-- Please do not add new nominations to this page, as this TFD day has concluded. Put any new nominations on the current day's page instead. Thank you for your cooperation. --> <!-- Please do not add new nominations to this page, as this TFD day has concluded. Put any new nominations on the current day's page instead. Thank you for your cooperation. -->
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was '''speedy deleted''' by ] as T1 candidates and I have no complaint. In general, if a template accuses people of being "negligent idiots" or "suicidal", it is an inflammatory one. ] ] 12:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
{{lt|User recycling2}}<br /> {{lt|User recycling2}}<br />
Line 19: Line 23:
|border-c = yellow |border-c = yellow
|border-s = 1 |border-s = 1
}}Wow, even I think this should be subst'ed and deleted. Calling people "negligent idiots" is definitely polemical and unhelpful to the encyclopedia. --]]]]] 21:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC) }}Wow, even I think this should be subst'ed and deleted. Calling people "negligent idiots" is definitely polemical and unhelpful to the encyclopedia. --]]]]] 21:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


<br clear=both/> <br clear=both/>
Line 28: Line 32:
|id = ] |id = ]
|id-c = green |id-c = green
|info = {{tfd-inline|User recycling2}} '''This user thinks that people who don't ] ] are ].''' |info = {{tlx|Tfd-inline|User recycling2}} '''This user thinks that people who don't ] ] are ].'''
|info-c = lime |info-c = lime
|info-fc = black |info-fc = black
Line 41: Line 45:
Anyway this is a user template and was proposed in the wronge place. The template is gone now so it dosn't matter but were my edits helpfull?--] 01:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Anyway this is a user template and was proposed in the wronge place. The template is gone now so it dosn't matter but were my edits helpfull?--] 01:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was '''no consensus''' to delete, defaults to keep. - ] 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
{{lt|Mills corp}}<br /> {{lt|Mills corp}}<br />
Line 55: Line 64:
*'''Delete''', templates by area would be useful (and are already used in many cases). People are unlikely to be interested in searching malls by operating group, so a less intrusive category or linked list would be a better way of presenting this information. ] ] 07:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', templates by area would be useful (and are already used in many cases). People are unlikely to be interested in searching malls by operating group, so a less intrusive category or linked list would be a better way of presenting this information. ] ] 07:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Looks like a decent navigational template to me. It is a bit large, but since it is placed at the bottom of articles, rather than at the top, it is not very obtrusive. ] ] 12:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Looks like a decent navigational template to me. It is a bit large, but since it is placed at the bottom of articles, rather than at the top, it is not very obtrusive. ] ] 12:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep'''. I find it interesting and useful. If there's a problem, it's fo rcleanup. ] 00:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''delete'''I think that it should be turned into a category--] 14:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was '''no consensus''' - ] 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
{{lt|Serebiidex}}<br /> {{lt|Serebiidex}}<br />
Line 75: Line 91:
] ] ] 15:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC) ] ] ] 15:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


*'''Speedy Keep''' Can I propose a bad faith nom? Not to sound ill-willed, but this a useful and helpful template that appears in all Pokémon articles. ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 18:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Speedy Keep''' Can I propose a bad faith nom? Not to sound ill-willed, but this a useful and helpful template that appears in all Pokémon articles. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 18:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I have no opinion on whether this template( {{tl|Serebiidex}}) should be deleted, however, if it is, it should first be substed in '''''ALL''''' instances, as {{tl|pokerefs}} is meant to be substed( with appropriate parameters), and therefore {{tl|Serebiidex}} is directly included in a large number of articles, plus the ones the creator manually inserted it in. Also, I don’t quite understand what ] ] ] means about parameters not being used, that’s complete bs, all the parameters are fully used. -- ] (]) 18:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment''' - I have no opinion on whether this template( {{tl|Serebiidex}}) should be deleted, however, if it is, it should first be substed in '''''ALL''''' instances, as {{tl|pokerefs}} is meant to be substed( with appropriate parameters), and therefore {{tl|Serebiidex}} is directly included in a large number of articles, plus the ones the creator manually inserted it in. Also, I don’t quite understand what ] ] ] means about parameters not being used, that’s complete bs, all the parameters are fully used. -- ] (]) 18:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - ok, lets first substed it. Once its all substeded and the template is no longer in use, we can delete it. Anyone who knows someone in Misplaced Pages who likes Pokémon, you can leave a message in their talk page.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] ] ] (] • ]) 18:53, May 23, 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- --> *'''Delete''' - ok, lets first substed it. Once its all substeded and the template is no longer in use, we can delete it. Anyone who knows someone in Misplaced Pages who likes Pokémon, you can leave a message in their talk page.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] ] ] (] • ]) 18:53, May 23, 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- -->
**Sign your comments. Well, we will wait for the results of this nomination and act accordingly ] (]) 19:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC) **Sign your comments. Well, we will wait for the results of this nomination and act accordingly ] (]) 19:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', augh. There's no need to link specifically to Serebii's Pokédex in every single Pokémon article, especially since we already link to Wikibooks's substantially identical Pokédex in every single Pokémon article. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 19:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', augh. There's no need to link specifically to Serebii's Pokédex in every single Pokémon article, <s>especially since we already link to Wikibooks's substantially identical Pokédex in every single Pokémon article.</s> - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 19:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
**However, it's up for deletion at wikibooks since it isn't a textbook.--]] (] • ]) 22:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC) **However, it's up for deletion at wikibooks since it isn't a textbook.--]] (] • ]) 22:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
***Can we denounce this vote? The wikibook has been deleted. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 07:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
****The pokédex has found a new home at http://www.gmcfoley.com/index.php?title=Pok%C3%A9mon ] 05:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
***I stand by this. The existence of the Wikibook was an aggravating factor; I still say we don't need a template to link to a strategy guide in every single article. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
****What difference is to before? All it does is change the way we link to Serebii. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 10:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*****I think AMIB believes that we ''shouldn’t'' link Serebii.net at all. -- ] (]) 17:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
******That could end up happening, lets wait until the results and see. I've put a notice in some of the talk pages so others will comment. If there are more people who want to delete it than people who want to keep it, we can delete it. If theres more people who want to keep it than delete it, we can keep it. (Speedy Keep and Speedy Delete count as two people. It only counts for unique Wikipedians) ] ] ] 18:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*******Indeed, let’s wait and see. So stop prematurely substing {{tl|Serebiidex}} and changing {{tl|pokerefs}}. -- ] (]) 01:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*<s>Delete If A Man In Black really is an administrator, he can delete it.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] ] ] (] • ]) 11:30, May 24, 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- --></s>
**Why yes, he ''can'' delete it. But he won’t, yet, because he has respect for the TfD process. You evidently don’t, as you’ve attempted to vote on your own nomination twice without signing. Please note that ] a democracy, it’s more about the points you make than how many votes there are either way. And if it ''were'' a democracy, you still wouldn’t be allowed to vote twice. -- ] (]) 00:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
***Stricken, duplicated vote ''']''' (]) <em><strong>]</strong></em> 16:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ···]<sup>] · <small>] <span style="color:darkblue;">to</span> ]]o]</small></sup> 18:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)</small>


*'''Comment''' Personally I don't see why it should be deleted, templates like this are useful for when links change and such - even if it isn't used in every pokemon article. This is an uninformed opinion, however. ] 22:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*<s>''Speedy Delete'' Serebii.net is totally offensive to my favourite POkémon, don't link back to serebii.net at all ].<small>—This user is a ] and suspected sockpuppet.</small></s>
**Please denounce this vote, it appears that it is a sockpuppet of the nominator (someone who I have alleged with various other similar accounts for sometime). He has no productive edits, only vandalism to AMIB's user page and here, and it is somewhat odd that a user could migrate here by chance. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 20:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
***I doubt the vote well be taken seriously anyway, look at the reasoning. -- ] (]) 01:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
****Stricken. ''']''' (]) <em><strong>]</strong></em> 16:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep.''' I think it's a useful template for the Pokémon articles. --] 20:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Note''' User:Iloveminun, the nominator, has altered the pokerefs template to completely remove all links to Serebii from it, replacing it with links to Pokémon Galaxy. Serebii is a valued source of Pokémon knowledge, and has been replaced with a website which actually crashes my window on both occassions I have gone near it. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 21:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
**While I agree with your assessment, your ad hominem argument has no bearing on the value of this template. -- ] (]) 01:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
***That's not an ad hominem argument. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
****I will freely admit this isn’t my forte, but I though an ad hominem argument was an argument relating to the character or actions of the person representing the opposition, rather than the merits of the case( in this instance, the value of {{tl|Serebiidex}}). -- ] (]) 21:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
***I have evidence on this. First of all, User:Iloveminun is trying to remove all connections with Serebii so he can replace it with Pokémon Galaxy. Pokémon Galaxy is actually Iloveminun's own site, which is why he's been POV pushing on the matter, as well as voting on this TfD repeatedly. I also have reason to believe that ] is a sock puppet to Iloveminun, primarily because of the instantaneous grasp of the TfD system, and the fact that I have two other users who I have evidence to link with Iloveminun. See all notes ]. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 12:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
****''' Lets just settle it''' We might as well just keep it, because I want to stop being accused of using sock puppets. IM NOT USING SOCKPUPPETS so lets just keep it if it can stop me from being accused.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] ] ] (] • ]) 19:28, May 28, 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- -->

*It has been confirmed that ] is the sockpuppet of ]. Confirmed ]. ]]] <sup>]</sup> 10:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' It's a pain in the ass to subst: templates in every article. I should know. I personally did so for the {{tl|pokerefs}} template on any article that already did not have it subst'd already. Besides, {{tl|serebiidex}} is used within {{tl|pokerefs}}, and the template is being used correctly on any and all articles that had {{tl|pokerefs}}. ] 22:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
**'''Addendum''' Also, Serebii.net is one of the best unofficial sites on the internet for anything related to Pokémon. The only advertisements they have are a few Google text ads, and they usually have the newest information up as soon as it comes out. ] 20:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep'''. Seems useful and used. -- ] 05:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was '''delete''' - ] 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
==== ] et al ==== ==== ] et al ====
{{lt|SGColor Tau'ri}}, {{lt|SGColor Goa'uld}}, {{lt|SGColor Other}}, {{lt|SGColor Human}}, {{lt|SGColor Asgard}}, {{lt|SGColor Wraith}}, {{lt|SGColor Tok'ra}}, {{lt|SGColor Jaffa}} all for deletion. {{lt|SGColor Tau'ri}}, {{lt|SGColor Goa'uld}}, {{lt|SGColor Other}}, {{lt|SGColor Human}}, {{lt|SGColor Asgard}}, {{lt|SGColor Wraith}}, {{lt|SGColor Tok'ra}}, {{lt|SGColor Jaffa}} all for deletion.


Entirely deprecated and replaced with better system. Now useless and orphaned. ]-- ] 13:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Entirely deprecated and replaced with better system. Now useless and orphaned. ]-- ] 13:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


* '''Delete'''. Knock 'em dead. ] (]) 03:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' per nom. -- ] 05:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was '''keep''' - ] 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
Another political party affiliation userbox, this time for an extreme right wing Norwegian party. Since I don't endorse T2 I am bringing this here. ] ] 09:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Another political party affiliation userbox, this time for an extreme right wing Norwegian party. Since I don't endorse T2 I am bringing this here. ] ] 09:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
:'''Keep.''' What about all the communist templates, then? They are extreme left-wing. --] 10:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC) :'''Keep.''' What about all the communist templates, then? They are extreme left-wing. --] 10:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keeep''' bad faith nom, not divisive --'''<font color="LimeGreen">]</font>''' ]<sup>]</sup> 15:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Keeep''' bad faith nom, not divisive --] ]<sup>]</sup> 15:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Whats wrong with right wing? - ] 20:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Whats wrong with right wing? - ] 20:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep''' Nothing offensive, divisive, etc. ] 00:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. There's nothing wrong with this. ] 07:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Political party affiliation userboxes are not breaking any rules on Misplaced Pages.--] 14:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. --] 02:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was '''delete''' ] 03:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
{{lt|Trinidad and Tobago infobox}}<br /> {{lt|Trinidad and Tobago infobox}}<br />
'''Delete'''. Was updated to the Template:Infobox country standard. Single use template that is not needed. Also, there wasn't anything on the talk page.&mdash; ] 02:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC) '''Delete'''. Was updated to the Template:Infobox country standard. Single use template that is not needed. Also, there wasn't anything on the talk page.&mdash; ] 02:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per all the other inidivual country infoboxces being deleted. --'''<font color="LimeGreen">]</font>''' ]<sup>]</sup> 16:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per all the other inidivual country infoboxces being deleted. --] ]<sup>]</sup> 16:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom and larsinio. ] 00:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' If you get rid of this you might as well get rid of ], and ], and ], and so on.--] 14:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
:*Comment&mdash;Those two must have slipped througth, but your wish is my command. Poof. Germany and Jamaica up for Deletion.&mdash;] 04:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
::*Comment: You missed {{]}}. -- ] 05:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Ridiculously Strong Keep'''. This is insane. why not just speedy delete everything on wikipedia? before you blindly nominate random pages for deletion, try to check how many pages link to them, and if it's heavily used. That's why there's the "What Links Here" link on the side of the wikipedia page. This excessive and useless nomination of pages has to come to an end... I'm just waiting for someone to nominate ] for deletion... <span style="border: 2px solid #330000; text-align:center; background: #C0C0C0; text-color: #DDDDDD; link: #A0522D; vlink: #000000"> ] - ] </span> 20:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
:* Comment&mdash;Whhhhaaat are you talking about? Ridiculous to replace an out-of-date, single-use template with an up-to-date template that is the standard for over 195 other countries. As for "What Links Here" on the ] page...almost nothing. Except three pages dealing with its deletion and one user My contrib page. So either you meant to post your Ridiculously Strong Keep to some other template for deletion (like Template:User DTF) '''OR''' you really do mean it. To which I would say: at no point in your infinite ramblings did you come close to a rational thought. Everyone here is now dumber for having read it. &mdash;] 04:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A uniform infobox, when practical, is preferred. If there are shortcomings in the country infobox then request enhancements (or better yet contribute the enhancements yourself). ] 20:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom --] | ] 05:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom, larsinio, and harpchad. -- ] 05:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom and harpchad. -- ] 18:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 02:06, 20 December 2022

< May 22 May 24 >

May 23, 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Drini as T1 candidates and I have no complaint. In general, if a template accuses people of being "negligent idiots" or "suicidal", it is an inflammatory one. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:User recycling2

Template:User recycling2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This user thinks that people who don't recycle waste are negligent idiots.
Wow, even I think this should be subst'ed and deleted. Calling people "negligent idiots" is definitely polemical and unhelpful to the encyclopedia. --M@rēino 21:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


Aww. I was fixing this template while sombeody deleted it. I improved it to

{{Tfd-inline|User recycling2}} This user thinks that people who don't recycle waste are suicidal.


Oh well Don't say i didn't try--E-Bod 01:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Anyway this is a user template and was proposed in the wronge place. The template is gone now so it dosn't matter but were my edits helpfull?--E-Bod 01:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, defaults to keep. - Mailer Diablo 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Mills corp

Template:Mills corp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Relisting per DRV. --Interiot 17:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

This template is too large see The Block at Orange for example and should be converted to a more economical category. MarsRover 01:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Since there are redlinks, a list would be better than a category - and a list is already part of the article Mills Corporation. The template currently provides categorisation for pages it is used on - if the template is removed, the category should be added back. SeventyThree 02:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus - Mailer Diablo 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Serebiidex

Template:Serebiidex (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template is just a link to a Pokedex, thats all thats in it. Even worse: The image is inside another templae so theres no need to worry about the text changing. What someone should do is enter {{subst:Serebiidex}} BEFORE the template gets deleted where the template is placed in {{Pokerefs}}. It also had parameters (Which was NOT used in any of the Pokemon articles.) We should apply the articles to Pokerefs, NOT a template inside Pokerefs. Theres no need to have a template inside a template unless the template is used in lots of other templates.

So in Pokerefs, change:

{{Serebiidex}}

to

{{subst:Serebiidex}}

which will turn it into:

’s 3rd Gen Pokédex entry for {{{2}}}]

and then apply parametres to Pokerefs by using this {{Pokerefs|PokemonNumbder|PokemonName}}, and it will include no time wasting, the parametres weren't currently used anyway. Please discuss what you should do and sign it using ~~~~ I Love Minun 15:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment Personally I don't see why it should be deleted, templates like this are useful for when links change and such - even if it isn't used in every pokemon article. This is an uninformed opinion, however. RN 22:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Serebii.net is totally offensive to my favourite POkémon, don't link back to serebii.net at all <i>P</i>o<i>k</i>e<i>m</i>o<i>n</i> Fan.—This user is a vandal and suspected sockpuppet.
  • Keep. I think it's a useful template for the Pokémon articles. --Sparky Lurkdragon 20:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Note User:Iloveminun, the nominator, has altered the pokerefs template to completely remove all links to Serebii from it, replacing it with links to Pokémon Galaxy. Serebii is a valued source of Pokémon knowledge, and has been replaced with a website which actually crashes my window on both occassions I have gone near it. Highway 21:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
    • While I agree with your assessment, your ad hominem argument has no bearing on the value of this template. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
      • That's not an ad hominem argument. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 03:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
        • I will freely admit this isn’t my forte, but I though an ad hominem argument was an argument relating to the character or actions of the person representing the opposition, rather than the merits of the case( in this instance, the value of {{Serebiidex}}). -- WikidSmaht (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
      • I have evidence on this. First of all, User:Iloveminun is trying to remove all connections with Serebii so he can replace it with Pokémon Galaxy. Pokémon Galaxy is actually Iloveminun's own site, which is why he's been POV pushing on the matter, as well as voting on this TfD repeatedly. I also have reason to believe that User:PokemonFan is a sock puppet to Iloveminun, primarily because of the instantaneous grasp of the TfD system, and the fact that I have two other users who I have evidence to link with Iloveminun. See all notes here. Highway 12:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
        • Lets just settle it We might as well just keep it, because I want to stop being accused of using sock puppets. IM NOT USING SOCKPUPPETS so lets just keep it if it can stop me from being accused.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by I Love Minun (talk • contribs) 19:28, May 28, 2006 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - Mailer Diablo 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:SGColor Tau'ri et al

Template:SGColor Tau'ri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Goa'uld (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Other (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Human (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Asgard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Wraith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Tok'ra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Template:SGColor Jaffa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) all for deletion.

Entirely deprecated and replaced with better system. Now useless and orphaned.  Alfakim --  talk  13:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Mailer Diablo 14:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:User DLF

Another political party affiliation userbox, this time for an extreme right wing Norwegian party. Since I don't endorse T2 I am bringing this here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Keep. What about all the communist templates, then? They are extreme left-wing. --80.239.107.30 10:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 03:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Trinidad and Tobago infobox

Template:Trinidad and Tobago infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete. Was updated to the Template:Infobox country standard. Single use template that is not needed. Also, there wasn't anything on the talk page.— MJCdetroit 02:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Ridiculously Strong Keep. This is insane. why not just speedy delete everything on wikipedia? before you blindly nominate random pages for deletion, try to check how many pages link to them, and if it's heavily used. That's why there's the "What Links Here" link on the side of the wikipedia page. This excessive and useless nomination of pages has to come to an end... I'm just waiting for someone to nominate Main page for deletion... User:Raccoon Fox - Talk 20:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment—Whhhhaaat are you talking about? Ridiculous to replace an out-of-date, single-use template with an up-to-date template that is the standard for over 195 other countries. As for "What Links Here" on the Template:Trinidad and Tobago infobox page...almost nothing. Except three pages dealing with its deletion and one user My contrib page. So either you meant to post your Ridiculously Strong Keep to some other template for deletion (like Template:User DTF) OR you really do mean it. To which I would say: at no point in your infinite ramblings did you come close to a rational thought. Everyone here is now dumber for having read it. —MJCdetroit 04:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.