Revision as of 18:31, 8 April 2013 edit86.184.89.208 (talk) →Biased entry: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 23:27, 23 December 2024 edit undoBabysharkboss2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,673 edits OneClickArchiver updating counter. |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
|
{{Calm}} |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|
{{Controversial}} |
|
|target=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive index |
|
|
|
{{British English}} |
|
|mask=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive <#> |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes}}{{controversial (politics)}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1date=06:38, 9 Jun 2004 |
|
|action1date=06:38, 9 Jun 2004 |
Line 57: |
Line 55: |
|
|action9=GAR |
|
|action9=GAR |
|
|action9date=00:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|action9date=00:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|action9link=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/GA4 |
|
|action9link=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/GA4 |
|
|action9result=delisted |
|
|action9result=delisted |
|
|action9oldid=478167894 |
|
|action9oldid=478167894 |
Line 67: |
Line 65: |
|
|action10oldid=481764771 |
|
|action10oldid=481764771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action11=GAR |
|
|
|action11date=15:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|action11link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Margaret Thatcher/3 |
|
|
|action11result=kept |
|
|
|action11oldid=559533991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action12=WAR |
|
|
|action12date=11:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|action12link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Conservatism/Assessment/Margaret Thatcher |
|
|
|action12result=approved |
|
|
|action12oldid=847308132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=FFA/GA |
|
|maindate=May 18, 2005 |
|
|maindate=May 18, 2005 |
|
|
|itndate=8 April 2013 |
|
|
|itnlink=Misplaced Pages:In the news/Candidates/April 2013#[Posted] Margaret Thatcher |
|
|
|otddate=2004-05-04 |
|
|
|otdoldid=6718103 |
|
|
|otd2date=2004-10-12 |
|
|
|otd2oldid=6790115 |
|
|
|otd3date=2007-05-04 |
|
|
|otd3oldid=128166242 |
|
|
|otd4date=2008-05-04 |
|
|
|otd4oldid=209970927 |
|
|
|otd5date=2009-05-04 |
|
|
|otd5oldid=287899753 |
|
|
|otd6date=2011-05-04 |
|
|
|otd6oldid=427442686 |
|
|
|otd7date=2012-05-04 |
|
|
|otd7oldid=490652752 |
|
|
|otd8date=2016-05-04 |
|
|
|otd8oldid=718210004 |
|
|
|otd9date=2019-05-04 |
|
|
|otd9oldid=895346226 |
|
|topic=Politics and government |
|
|topic=Politics and government |
|
|
|otd10date=2023-05-04|otd10oldid=1153119456 |
|
|currentstatus=FFA/GA}} |
|
|
|
|otd11date=2024-05-04|otd11oldid=1222034541 |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners|1= |
|
|
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|listas=Thatcher, Margaret|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high|peerage-work-group=yes|peerage-priority=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Lincolnshire|class=GA|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|listas=Thatcher, Margaret|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|living=no|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography |politician-work-group=yes |politician-priority=high |peerage-work-group=yes |peerage-priority=high |s&a-work-group=yes |s&a-priority=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=GA|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Cold War|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Lincolnshire|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject London|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|liberalism=yes|class=GA|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Military history|b1=y|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|British=yes|Cold-War=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject University of Oxford|class=GA|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Cold War |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject London|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=GA|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=High}} |
|
{{WPWS|class=GA|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject University of Oxford|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WP1.0|class=GA|category=category|importance=high}}}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=top}} |
|
{{DEFAULTSORT:Thatcher, Margaret}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women scientists|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{pressmulti |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women writers| importance=Mid}} |
|
|author= ] |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject England|importance=High}} |
|
|date= Tuesday 7 April 2009 |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
|
{{Annual report|]|10,401,057<!--51-->}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|April 7, 2013|April 14, 2013|November 15, 2020|November 22, 2020|November 29, 2020|December 6, 2020|December 13, 2020}} |
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
{{Press |
|
|
|author= ] |
|
|
|date= 7 April 2009 |
|
|url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/07/wikipedia-encarta |
|
|url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/07/wikipedia-encarta |
|
|title= Encarta's failure is no tragedy:Misplaced Pages has succeeded where Microsoft's Encarta failed, and seems to be a reversal of the 'tragedy of the commons' |
|
|title= Encarta's failure is no tragedy |
|
|org= ] |
|
|org= ] |
|
|section= News:Technology:Misplaced Pages |
|
|section= |
|
|
|author2= Stephen Foley |
|
|
|
|
|
|date2= 3 February 2009 |
|
|author2= ] |
|
|
|date2= Tuesday, 3 February 2009 |
|
|
|url2= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/so-is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1543527.html |
|
|url2= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/so-is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1543527.html |
|
|
|title2= Is Misplaced Pages cracking up? |
|
|title2= So is Misplaced Pages cracking up?:It was a utopian vision: an encyclopedia for the people, by the people. But eight years on, Misplaced Pages is plagued by endless hoaxes, and lurches from one cash crisis to another. Will it become a footnote in the history of the web? |
|
|
|org2= ] |
|
|org2= ] |
|
|section2= Home:Life&Style:Gadgets&Tech:Features |
|
|section2= February |
|
|
|author3= Alex Hern |
|
|
|date3= 9 April 2013 |
|
|
|url3= http://www.newstatesman.com/alex-hern/2013/04/how-wikipedia-covered-thatchers-death |
|
|
|title3= How Misplaced Pages covered Thatcher's death |
|
|
|org3= ] |
|
|
|section3= |
|
|
|author4= Fatima Ahmed-Farouta |
|
|
|date4= 2 May 2013 |
|
|
|url4= http://www.webcitation.org/6GMqFsmH9 |
|
|
|title4= Redressing Misplaced Pages's Historical Gender Gap |
|
|
|org4= ] |
|
|
|section4= May |
|
|collapsed=yes}} |
|
|collapsed=yes}} |
|
|
{{Section sizes}} |
|
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-05-04|oldid1=6718103|date2=2004-10-12|oldid2=6790115|date3=2007-05-04|oldid3=128166242|date4=2008-05-04|oldid4=209970927|date5=2009-05-04|oldid5=287899753|date6=2011-05-04|oldid6=427442686|date7=2012-05-04|oldid7=490652752}} |
|
|
|
{{Refideas |
|
|
|{{cite book |
|
|
| last=Moore |first=Charles |
|
|
| year=2019 |
|
|
| title=Margaret Thatcher: Herself Alone |volume=3 |
|
|
| url={{Google books|HT71wQEACAAJ|plainurl=yes}} |
|
|
| publisher=Penguin Books |
|
|
| isbn=978-0-241-32474-5}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100k |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100k |
|
|counter = 22 |
|
|counter = 29 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|algo = old(60d) |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|archive = Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{Conservatism SA}} |
|
|
|
|target=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive index |
|
{{notice|{{find}}}} |
|
|
|
|mask=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive <#> |
|
{{auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=60|small=yes|dounreplied=yes}} |
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
== GA review == |
|
|
|
|
|
Why come Margaret Thatcher in 1987 anyway? Is it or not? |
|
|
{{Talk:Margaret Thatcher/GA4}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Foreign policy not covered in main article == |
|
|
|
|
|
Under foreign relations, there definitely should be some reference to her dealings with ], perhaps someone with better knowledge could attempt this? |
|
|
|
|
|
Also, maybe a mention of the ] deal? |
|
|
] (]) 00:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Does each sentence need a citation? == |
|
|
|
|
|
My understanding is that every sentence with some fact in it needs a citation. Is this true? Does the sentence "After seeing the Queen, calling other world leaders, and making one final Commons speech, she left Downing Street in tears." need a footnote? It seems to me to be controversial enough to require a citation attached to that sentence and so I put a CN tag on that sentence. Subsequently I received a message on my User Page -- ] -- that I was in error to put a CN tag on it. Was I? --] (]) 04:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:You are right but the cite may not always be at the end of the sentence but could be further on at the end of the paragraph. ] (]) 19:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::see ] <font face="Vivaldi">]</font>⇔] 12:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Full title of Baroness Thatcher == |
|
|
|
|
|
Just a genaral point on the introductory section. Her title, after accepting a peerage, is Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven in the County of Lincolnshire (as noted elsewhere in the article) - so shouldn't this be stated in the introduction? ] (]) 14:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Let's not have a "tributes" section. == |
|
|
|
|
|
I whole-heartedly agree with whoever wrote: <nowiki><!-- Please do not add tributes from around the world. It is unnecessary and clutters the article. --></nowiki> |
|
|
|
|
|
These sections with condolences and little flags repel me. We should not have one. --] (]) 12:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I agree 100%. ] ] 13:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::I don't agree 100%, I agree 0%. Those first reactions are important. --] (]) 13:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:::They're non-encyclopaedic and you'll note not used on other pages. Misplaced Pages is not a memorial, it's an encyclopaedia. ] ] 13:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Exactly. For example, ], her contemporary, or ] her hero <font face="Georgia">]<sub>]</font> 14:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:::They may be important in a newspaper story, or a breaking news TV report, but Misplaced Pages is neither. There will be no tributes section. ] ] 14:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. --] (] · ] · ]) 15:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I agree, but with a small caveat. Obviously the soundbites from talking heads aren't notable and I honestly don't know why people add that kind of fluff to articles. But there may be one or two quotes that emerge over the next few days that might be useful in illustrating how she was viewed during her time in office and at the time of her death. Though having said that, any particularly significant quotes will likely appear in the slew of books that I'm sure publishers are ordering as I type. ] | ] 15:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Surely the reaction of other world leaders - especially those diametrically opposed to her politics (such as US President Obama and UK Labour party leader Milliband) - are relevant to how she was perceived? ] (]) 15:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:Such immediate reactions are of little, if any, lasting value. So the answer is no, they're not. But you've clearly commented here without taking the trouble to actually read the article, as Milliband's reaction is already covered. ] ] 15:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::I think you both mean Miliband (and he's not a world leader). I agree with Malleus and any quotations of lasting relevance will likely come from proper eulogies rather than kneejerk soundbites ''']]''' 16:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
*Reactions aren't worthwhile mentioning. Everyone will express their sympathy, some will reminisce about her and the good old empire, etc. Responses that might ''lead'' to something, that's different, but it's hard to see how a reaction to this person's death will change anything in the real world. ] (]) 17:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
It's very simple, really: The statements on the occasion of her demise, will fit marvelously into the "quotes about her" part of the wikiquote site's article concerning her. Hence, the only parts I would include in the article, would be a small part about her funeral (which is yet to come as I write this), and, if it should happen, any special happening surrounding her demise (such as a major memorial- or good-riddance- party...). (Personally, I would attend the memorial version, but unless and until any of those parties occur, I see reason only to include something on her (currently future) funeral...) |
|
|
] (]) 18:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== reads like conservative party propaganda == |
|
|
|
|
|
this article is biased and reads like it was written by a tory apparatchik. |
|
|
especially the criticism section where it reads as if all the problems she created with her policies were the fault of the previous government/s (same tory propaganda is in full swing again today) |
|
|
from the way this article presents the facts thatcher was barely controversial in any way and only did beneficial things to the UK. which is 100% opposite to the prevailing wisdom of sociologist who study britain. |
|
|
the article is lacking in facts and has a large dose of misinformation in it. ] (]) 13:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:<humor>The tories should participate as toros in a corrida.</humor> Advice: edit Thatcher and bring it into a neutral form. --] (]) 13:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Margaret Thatcher's name == |
|
:Your opinion is biased, and looks like it was written by a member of the far left who hasn't even read the article. ] ] 14:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried correcting Margaret Thatcher's name in the infobox to "Margaret Thatcher" as someone had set it to "The Baroness Thatcher", but this was reverted. I'm pretty sure her first name isn't "The". According to the template documentation at infobox person, the name parameter is for "Common name of person", not their title. ] (]) 21:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Having actually read the article, specifically the section, "Political Legacy," I have to agree somewhat with the sentiment shared by the OP. I believe this article is NOT neutral and should be flagged as such. It glosses over the decline of union membership and unions that was caused by Thatcher's policies, and the entire article fails to mention Section 28, the anti-gay policy that had the effect of turning homosexuality into a taboo topic in schools and other government facilities. I'm certain that there are more deficiencies I have not yet found, but my non-union job only allows me a 30-minute break for lunch and I have yet to eat the one piece of fruit that I can afford working on minimum wage. ] (]) 16:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Perhaps these infobox templates need an honorific_prefix_2 parameter. What is your take on this situation, ]? I took a look at ] and it says "In general, honorific prefixes and suffixes should not be included, but may be discussed in the article." However, it does make an exception for including Sir, Dame, Lord and Lady in infoboxes (without explaining why). ] (]) 22:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:You didn't correct anything. Her title was The Baroness Thatcher; see {{url|https://members.parliament.uk/member/953/career}}. ‑‑] (] <b>·</b> ] <b>·</b> ]) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{ping|Neveselbert}} That page says "Her full title was The Rt Hon. the Baroness Thatcher LG OM. '''Her name was Margaret Hilda Thatcher'''." The name parameter, as I'm sure you know, is for a person's name, not their title. What am I missing here? ] (]) 21:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{ping|Neveselbert}} Do you still object to changing the name parameter to "Margaret Thatcher"? ] (]) 01:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Yes. It's standard across infoboxes of all articles for British peers to use their name in the peerage. ‑‑] (] <b>·</b> ] <b>·</b> ]) 20:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:If put to an RfC, I expect the wider community would not support highlighting this much less globally known title in the infobox. Past sentiment to that effect can be found ] and ]. ] (] | ]) 16:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Ireland vs The Republic of Ireland == |
|
:::Then you believe incorrectly. That it does not reflect your own personal views is neither here nor there. ] ] 16:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979–1990) > Northern Ireland > Paragraph 3 > line 3 |
|
== Thatcher's Views of Human Sexuality == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The Republic of Ireland" should read "Ireland". There are two countries on the Island of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" should be used to avoid ambiguity. As per article 4 of the the name of the state is "Éire" or, in English, "Ireland". |
|
Lady Thatcher has a rather remarkable history when it comes to human sexuality and I believe this should be noted. Not only did she publicly acknowledge that homosexuality ought to be decriminalized, she was one of the earliest Conservatives to do so. Yet her views are unclear and require further research as regards to Section 28, which could either have been a concept she embraced or a compromise she grudgingly accepted. Not being a particularly ardent student of her biography, I would be completely unable to tell how she viewed this topic. Given its relevance to the times in which she lived and its importance in illustrating the depth and complexity of her character, I feel that the article is lacking by the omission of this topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The Republic of" is a descriptor of the type of state Ireland is and not the correct term at all when referring to the country regardless of how often it is incorrectly used. ] (]) 12:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
Furthermore, in a time when President Reagan was studiously ignoring or avoiding the topic of the HIV/AIDS crisis, Lady Thatcher supported definitive and humane steps to stem the spread of the disease. This also speaks to who she was as a person and as a politician, because these were not easy positions to take within the cultural and political contexts of the 1980s. ] (]) 16:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I think it's best to use Republic of Ireland on articles like this to avoid confusion regarding the Northern Ireland situation. After all, the consensus on the rest of Misplaced Pages seems to be that we ] (see the ] article and the ] article and other articles related to the matter, e.g. ], ]). It's a relatively minor thing in the grander scheme of things, with people from both the islands of Ireland and Great Britain using the term Republic of Ireland for the sovereign state. Again, this also helps avoid confusion with the Northern Ireland situation, as Northern Ireland is governed by the UK and not the Republic, which was the same situation back when Thatcher was around. Therefore, I don't really see a reason to change the name used on the article here. ] (]) 13:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Now, boys and girls, if you ''really'' want tributes... == |
|
|
|
::You think its best but its blatantly correct. Its an incredibly common occurence that British media uses "The Republic of Ireland" rather than acknowledge that there is one country called Ireland and another called Northern Ireland. If the aim is to distinguish between the two then "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" is a far more accurate way of doing so. |
|
|
::Would also add that the use of "The Republic of Ireland" has fallen out of use drastically in the last 10-20 years. You may have noticed that in the 2000s that when selecting your nationality from a list Ireland would be listed as "The Republic of Ireland", this something that has become very uncommon in recent years. |
|
|
::Personally I find the use of "The Republic of Ireland" to be completely against the mission statement of Misplaced Pages to deliver unbiased information. Ireland is one country and its name is stated in its constitution. It should be referred to as such. Feel free to have your own opinions on it but those would be your opinions and not in line with the identity of the nation as outlined in its constitution. There is an exceptionally long history since the days of home rule of refusal by the British government to use the correct name for Ireland in an effort to make it seem more of secession rather than a regaining of independence. ] (]) 14:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I have even experienced that British people (i.e. British Airways staff) called it Southern Ireland. But please note that ] links to the island and not to a country. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 16:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:We have a guideline on this: see ]. The first bullet point is why "Republic of Ireland" is used here. ] ] 16:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Use of the term "Statesman" == |
|
...these are from the Guardian online. Yes, very disappointing for the faithful who will be unable to delete my additions in that mildly condescending and naturally arrogant dismissal of a newspaper that ironically always boasted about having helped put her where she was :p as the Guardian is perceived to conform to ]... here ya go. PS: Think Galloway might win the prize for tactful tweet of the hour {{wink}} |
|
|
Of course, they're not all 'world-leaders' (ironically, very few today actually ''knew'' or worked with her), but they ''are'' well-known and easilly verifiable... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misplaced Pages defines a statesman/woman as: |
|
<blockquote>]-'Margaret Thatcher was an extraordinary woman but she was extraordinary for mostly the wrong reasons.'</br> |
|
|
]- 'Margaret Thatcher was the most divisive and destructive Prime Minister of modern times. Mass Unemployment, factory closures, communities destroyed – this is her legacy. She was a fighter and her enemy was the British working class' |
|
|
</br>] -'Margaret Thatcher did great hurt to the Irish and British people during her time as British prime minister. Working class communities were devastated in Britain because of her policies.' |
|
|
</br>]- 'Tramp the dirt down' & 'Thatcher described Nelson Mandela as a "terrorist". I was there. I saw her lips move. May she burn in the hellfires.' |
|
|
</br>]- 'She created today's housing crisis. She created the banking crisis. And she created the benefits crisis. It was her government that started putting people on incapacity benefit rather than register them as unemployed because the Britain she inherited was broadly full employment. She decided when she wrote off our manufacturing industry that she could live with two or three million unemployed, and the benefits bill, the legacy of that, we are struggling with today. In actual fact, every real problem we face today is the legacy of the fact that she was fundamentally wrong'</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A ] or a leader in an organization who has had a long and respected career at the national or international level. |
|
And in case anyone thinks that's ''too'' one-sided....? A very '''supportive''' one from ], of course- !!! </br> |
|
|
<font face="Georgia">]<sub>]</font> 17:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merriam-Webster: |
|
{{RPA}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A wise, skillful, and respected political leader |
|
Those are referenced quotes that conform to verifiability standards, whether you appprove or not. Your contribution seems to rely on talking about your ]. Go troll elsewhere, anon. <font face="Georgia">]<sub>]</font> 17:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am commenting of Thatcher specifically, but many historical politicians are referred to as Statespeople on this site and I think it's unobjective to say that any controversial historical figure was "Wise, skillful, and respected." In my opinion, this line should be removed and politician may suffice. ] (]) 02:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
Don't dispute the verifiability. {{RPA}} Stop it. |
|
|
|
:I would tend to agree, but it's probably something that needs to be raised more widely e.g. at ]. <span style=white-space:nowrap;>] <span style="background-color:lavender;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black">]</span></span> 03:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:It's sourced in the article body. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the line. ‑‑] (] <b>·</b> ] <b>·</b> ]) 18:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Requested grammar fix == |
|
== celebrations of her death in the UK: Widely reported. Highly unusual. Why aren't they even mentioned? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"As well working with the CIA in Operation Cyclone ..." |
|
As can be seen, https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=uk&tbm=nws&q=thatcher+celebration&oq=thatcher+celebration&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.13511.19613.0.19779.20.4.0.16.16.0.119.351.3j1.4.0...0.0...1ac.1.D8AtSNMIcpg#hl=en&safe=off&gl=uk&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=thatcher+celebration+dead&oq=thatcher+celebration+dead&gs_l=serp.3...23000.24453.1.25259.5.5.0.0.0.0.121.531.2j3.5.0...0.0...1c.1.8.psy-ab.BqVOLf2AkMY&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44770516,d.d2k&fp=e7cea0d1593531a2&biw=1440&bih=737 a lot of newspapers and other reliable news sources are covering the outpourings of jubilation at Thatcher's death. Few major British news sources are ''not'' covering this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That should be "As well '''as''' working with the CIA in Operation Cyclone ..." |
|
I cannot see how it isn't a straight violation of POV ''not'' to mention them. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 18:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 13:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Biased entry == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Fixed. ] (]) 13:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
Thatcher did not revitalise the UK economy, she annihilated it, which is why we are in such a mess now as she decimated the manufacturing industries. Curbing the unions was not the good thing portrayed here either. I must've lived in a completely different UK in the 1980's than the author of this rubbish. |
|
I tried correcting Margaret Thatcher's name in the infobox to "Margaret Thatcher" as someone had set it to "The Baroness Thatcher", but this was reverted. I'm pretty sure her first name isn't "The". According to the template documentation at infobox person, the name parameter is for "Common name of person", not their title. Nosferattus (talk) 21:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979–1990) > Northern Ireland > Paragraph 3 > line 3
"The Republic of Ireland" should read "Ireland". There are two countries on the Island of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" should be used to avoid ambiguity. As per article 4 of the Irish constitution the name of the state is "Éire" or, in English, "Ireland".
"The Republic of" is a descriptor of the type of state Ireland is and not the correct term at all when referring to the country regardless of how often it is incorrectly used. Revlon1997 (talk) 12:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I am commenting of Thatcher specifically, but many historical politicians are referred to as Statespeople on this site and I think it's unobjective to say that any controversial historical figure was "Wise, skillful, and respected." In my opinion, this line should be removed and politician may suffice. Milfiresices (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)