Misplaced Pages

Talk:Margaret Thatcher: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:31, 8 April 2013 edit86.184.89.208 (talk) Biased entry: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:27, 23 December 2024 edit undoBabysharkboss2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,673 edits OneClickArchiver updating counter. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{talk header|search=yes}} {{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Calm}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
{{Controversial}}
|target=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive index
{{British English}}
|mask=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive <#>
{{Article history
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}{{controversial (politics)}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=FAC |action1=FAC
|action1date=06:38, 9 Jun 2004 |action1date=06:38, 9 Jun 2004
Line 57: Line 55:
|action9=GAR |action9=GAR
|action9date=00:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |action9date=00:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
|action9link=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/GA4 ‎ |action9link=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/GA4 ‎
|action9result=delisted |action9result=delisted
|action9oldid=478167894 |action9oldid=478167894
Line 67: Line 65:
|action10oldid=481764771 |action10oldid=481764771


|action11=GAR
|action11date=15:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
|action11link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Margaret Thatcher/3
|action11result=kept
|action11oldid=559533991

|action12=WAR
|action12date=11:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
|action12link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Conservatism/Assessment/Margaret Thatcher
|action12result=approved
|action12oldid=847308132

|currentstatus=FFA/GA
|maindate=May 18, 2005 |maindate=May 18, 2005
|itndate=8 April 2013
|itnlink=Misplaced Pages:In the news/Candidates/April 2013#&#91;Posted&#93; Margaret Thatcher
|otddate=2004-05-04
|otdoldid=6718103
|otd2date=2004-10-12
|otd2oldid=6790115
|otd3date=2007-05-04
|otd3oldid=128166242
|otd4date=2008-05-04
|otd4oldid=209970927
|otd5date=2009-05-04
|otd5oldid=287899753
|otd6date=2011-05-04
|otd6oldid=427442686
|otd7date=2012-05-04
|otd7oldid=490652752
|otd8date=2016-05-04
|otd8oldid=718210004
|otd9date=2019-05-04
|otd9oldid=895346226
|topic=Politics and government |topic=Politics and government
|otd10date=2023-05-04|otd10oldid=1153119456
|currentstatus=FFA/GA}}
|otd11date=2024-05-04|otd11oldid=1222034541
{{WikiProjectBanners|1=
}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|listas=Thatcher, Margaret|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high|peerage-work-group=yes|peerage-priority=high}}
{{WikiProject Lincolnshire|class=GA|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|listas=Thatcher, Margaret|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|living=no|1=
{{WikiProject Biography |politician-work-group=yes |politician-priority=high |peerage-work-group=yes |peerage-priority=high |s&a-work-group=yes |s&a-priority=high}}
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=GA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Cold War|class=GA|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Lincolnshire|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject London|class=GA|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Politics|liberalism=yes|class=GA|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Military history|b1=y|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|British=yes|Cold-War=yes}}
{{WikiProject University of Oxford|class=GA|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Cold War |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=GA|importance=high}} {{WikiProject London|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=GA|importance=top}} {{WikiProject Politics|importance=High}}
{{WPWS|class=GA|importance=low}} {{WikiProject University of Oxford|importance=Low}}
{{WP1.0|class=GA|category=category|importance=high}}}} {{WikiProject Women's History|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=top}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Thatcher, Margaret}}
{{WikiProject Women scientists|importance=Mid}}
{{pressmulti
{{WikiProject Women writers| importance=Mid}}
|author= ]
{{WikiProject England|importance=High}}
|date= Tuesday 7 April 2009
}}
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|
{{Annual report|]|10,401,057<!--51-->}}
{{Top 25 Report|April 7, 2013|April 14, 2013|November 15, 2020|November 22, 2020|November 29, 2020|December 6, 2020|December 13, 2020}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{Press
|author= ]
|date= 7 April 2009
|url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/07/wikipedia-encarta |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/07/wikipedia-encarta
|title= Encarta's failure is no tragedy:Misplaced Pages has succeeded where Microsoft's Encarta failed, and seems to be a reversal of the 'tragedy of the commons' |title= Encarta's failure is no tragedy
|org= ] |org= ]
|section= News:Technology:Misplaced Pages |section=
|author2= Stephen Foley

|date2= 3 February 2009
|author2= ]
|date2= Tuesday, 3 February 2009
|url2= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/so-is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1543527.html |url2= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/so-is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1543527.html
|title2= Is Misplaced Pages cracking up?
|title2= So is Misplaced Pages cracking up?:It was a utopian vision: an encyclopedia for the people, by the people. But eight years on, Misplaced Pages is plagued by endless hoaxes, and lurches from one cash crisis to another. Will it become a footnote in the history of the web?
|org2= ] |org2= ]
|section2= Home:Life&Style:Gadgets&Tech:Features |section2= February
|author3= Alex Hern
|date3= 9 April 2013
|url3= http://www.newstatesman.com/alex-hern/2013/04/how-wikipedia-covered-thatchers-death
|title3= How Misplaced Pages covered Thatcher's death
|org3= ]
|section3=
|author4= Fatima Ahmed-Farouta
|date4= 2 May 2013
|url4= http://www.webcitation.org/6GMqFsmH9
|title4= Redressing Misplaced Pages's Historical Gender Gap
|org4= ]
|section4= May
|collapsed=yes}} |collapsed=yes}}
{{Section sizes}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-05-04|oldid1=6718103|date2=2004-10-12|oldid2=6790115|date3=2007-05-04|oldid3=128166242|date4=2008-05-04|oldid4=209970927|date5=2009-05-04|oldid5=287899753|date6=2011-05-04|oldid6=427442686|date7=2012-05-04|oldid7=490652752}}
{{Refideas
|{{cite book
| last=Moore |first=Charles
| year=2019
| title=Margaret Thatcher: Herself Alone |volume=3
| url={{Google books|HT71wQEACAAJ|plainurl=yes}}
| publisher=Penguin Books
| isbn=978-0-241-32474-5}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100k |maxarchivesize = 100k
|counter = 22 |counter = 29
|minthreadsleft = 4 |minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(60d) |algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
{{Conservatism SA}}
|target=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive index
{{notice|{{find}}}}
|mask=Talk:Margaret Thatcher/Archive <#>
{{auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=60|small=yes|dounreplied=yes}}
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes

}}
== GA review ==

Why come Margaret Thatcher in 1987 anyway? Is it or not?
{{Talk:Margaret Thatcher/GA4}}

== Foreign policy not covered in main article ==

Under foreign relations, there definitely should be some reference to her dealings with ], perhaps someone with better knowledge could attempt this?

Also, maybe a mention of the ] deal?
] (]) 00:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

== Does each sentence need a citation? ==

My understanding is that every sentence with some fact in it needs a citation. Is this true? Does the sentence "After seeing the Queen, calling other world leaders, and making one final Commons speech, she left Downing Street in tears." need a footnote? It seems to me to be controversial enough to require a citation attached to that sentence and so I put a CN tag on that sentence. Subsequently I received a message on my User Page -- ] -- that I was in error to put a CN tag on it. Was I? --] (]) 04:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
:You are right but the cite may not always be at the end of the sentence but could be further on at the end of the paragraph. ] (]) 19:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
::see ] <font face="Vivaldi">]</font>⇔] 12:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

== Full title of Baroness Thatcher ==

Just a genaral point on the introductory section. Her title, after accepting a peerage, is Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven in the County of Lincolnshire (as noted elsewhere in the article) - so shouldn't this be stated in the introduction? ] (]) 14:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

== Let's not have a "tributes" section. ==

I whole-heartedly agree with whoever wrote: <nowiki><!-- Please do not add tributes from around the world. It is unnecessary and clutters the article. --></nowiki>

These sections with condolences and little flags repel me. We should not have one. --] (]) 12:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

:I agree 100%. ] ] 13:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
::I don't agree 100%, I agree 0%. Those first reactions are important. --] (]) 13:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
:::They're non-encyclopaedic and you'll note not used on other pages. Misplaced Pages is not a memorial, it's an encyclopaedia. ] ] 13:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
::::Exactly. For example, ], her contemporary, or ] her hero <font face="Georgia">]<sub>]</font> 14:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
:::They may be important in a newspaper story, or a breaking news TV report, but Misplaced Pages is neither. There will be no tributes section. ] ] 14:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
:::Not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. --] (] · ] · ]) 15:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
::::I agree, but with a small caveat. Obviously the soundbites from talking heads aren't notable and I honestly don't know why people add that kind of fluff to articles. But there may be one or two quotes that emerge over the next few days that might be useful in illustrating how she was viewed during her time in office and at the time of her death. Though having said that, any particularly significant quotes will likely appear in the slew of books that I'm sure publishers are ordering as I type. ] &#124; ] 15:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Surely the reaction of other world leaders - especially those diametrically opposed to her politics (such as US President Obama and UK Labour party leader Milliband) - are relevant to how she was perceived? ] (]) 15:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
:Such immediate reactions are of little, if any, lasting value. So the answer is no, they're not. But you've clearly commented here without taking the trouble to actually read the article, as Milliband's reaction is already covered. ] ] 15:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
::I think you both mean Miliband (and he's not a world leader). I agree with Malleus and any quotations of lasting relevance will likely come from proper eulogies rather than kneejerk soundbites ''']]''' 16:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
*Reactions aren't worthwhile mentioning. Everyone will express their sympathy, some will reminisce about her and the good old empire, etc. Responses that might ''lead'' to something, that's different, but it's hard to see how a reaction to this person's death will change anything in the real world. ] (]) 17:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

It's very simple, really: The statements on the occasion of her demise, will fit marvelously into the "quotes about her" part of the wikiquote site's article concerning her. Hence, the only parts I would include in the article, would be a small part about her funeral (which is yet to come as I write this), and, if it should happen, any special happening surrounding her demise (such as a major memorial- or good-riddance- party...). (Personally, I would attend the memorial version, but unless and until any of those parties occur, I see reason only to include something on her (currently future) funeral...)
] (]) 18:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

== reads like conservative party propaganda ==

this article is biased and reads like it was written by a tory apparatchik.
especially the criticism section where it reads as if all the problems she created with her policies were the fault of the previous government/s (same tory propaganda is in full swing again today)
from the way this article presents the facts thatcher was barely controversial in any way and only did beneficial things to the UK. which is 100% opposite to the prevailing wisdom of sociologist who study britain.
the article is lacking in facts and has a large dose of misinformation in it. ] (]) 13:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
:<humor>The tories should participate as toros in a corrida.</humor> Advice: edit Thatcher and bring it into a neutral form. --] (]) 13:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


== Margaret Thatcher's name ==
:Your opinion is biased, and looks like it was written by a member of the far left who hasn't even read the article. ] ] 14:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


I tried correcting Margaret Thatcher's name in the infobox to "Margaret Thatcher" as someone had set it to "The Baroness Thatcher", but this was reverted. I'm pretty sure her first name isn't "The". According to the template documentation at infobox person, the name parameter is for "Common name of person", not their title. ] (]) 21:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
::Having actually read the article, specifically the section, "Political Legacy," I have to agree somewhat with the sentiment shared by the OP. I believe this article is NOT neutral and should be flagged as such. It glosses over the decline of union membership and unions that was caused by Thatcher's policies, and the entire article fails to mention Section 28, the anti-gay policy that had the effect of turning homosexuality into a taboo topic in schools and other government facilities. I'm certain that there are more deficiencies I have not yet found, but my non-union job only allows me a 30-minute break for lunch and I have yet to eat the one piece of fruit that I can afford working on minimum wage. ] (]) 16:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
:Perhaps these infobox templates need an honorific_prefix_2 parameter. What is your take on this situation, ]? I took a look at ] and it says "In general, honorific prefixes and suffixes should not be included, but may be discussed in the article." However, it does make an exception for including Sir, Dame, Lord and Lady in infoboxes (without explaining why). ] (]) 22:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
:You didn't correct anything. Her title was The Baroness Thatcher; see {{url|https://members.parliament.uk/member/953/career}}. &#8209;&#8209;] (] <b>·</b> ] <b>·</b> ]) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|Neveselbert}} That page says "Her full title was The Rt Hon. the Baroness Thatcher LG OM. '''Her name was Margaret Hilda Thatcher'''." The name parameter, as I'm sure you know, is for a person's name, not their title. What am I missing here? ] (]) 21:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|Neveselbert}} Do you still object to changing the name parameter to "Margaret Thatcher"? ] (]) 01:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes. It's standard across infoboxes of all articles for British peers to use their name in the peerage. &#8209;&#8209;] (] <b>·</b> ] <b>·</b> ]) 20:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
:If put to an RfC, I expect the wider community would not support highlighting this much less globally known title in the infobox. Past sentiment to that effect can be found ] and ]. ] (] &#124; ]) 16:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


== Ireland vs The Republic of Ireland ==
:::Then you believe incorrectly. That it does not reflect your own personal views is neither here nor there. ] ] 16:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979–1990) > Northern Ireland > Paragraph 3 > line 3
== Thatcher's Views of Human Sexuality ==


"The Republic of Ireland" should read "Ireland". There are two countries on the Island of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" should be used to avoid ambiguity. As per article 4 of the the name of the state is "Éire" or, in English, "Ireland".
Lady Thatcher has a rather remarkable history when it comes to human sexuality and I believe this should be noted. Not only did she publicly acknowledge that homosexuality ought to be decriminalized, she was one of the earliest Conservatives to do so. Yet her views are unclear and require further research as regards to Section 28, which could either have been a concept she embraced or a compromise she grudgingly accepted. Not being a particularly ardent student of her biography, I would be completely unable to tell how she viewed this topic. Given its relevance to the times in which she lived and its importance in illustrating the depth and complexity of her character, I feel that the article is lacking by the omission of this topic.


"The Republic of" is a descriptor of the type of state Ireland is and not the correct term at all when referring to the country regardless of how often it is incorrectly used. ] (]) 12:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, in a time when President Reagan was studiously ignoring or avoiding the topic of the HIV/AIDS crisis, Lady Thatcher supported definitive and humane steps to stem the spread of the disease. This also speaks to who she was as a person and as a politician, because these were not easy positions to take within the cultural and political contexts of the 1980s. ] (]) 16:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


:I think it's best to use Republic of Ireland on articles like this to avoid confusion regarding the Northern Ireland situation. After all, the consensus on the rest of Misplaced Pages seems to be that we ] (see the ] article and the ] article and other articles related to the matter, e.g. ], ]). It's a relatively minor thing in the grander scheme of things, with people from both the islands of Ireland and Great Britain using the term Republic of Ireland for the sovereign state. Again, this also helps avoid confusion with the Northern Ireland situation, as Northern Ireland is governed by the UK and not the Republic, which was the same situation back when Thatcher was around. Therefore, I don't really see a reason to change the name used on the article here. ] (]) 13:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
== Now, boys and girls, if you ''really'' want tributes... ==
::You think its best but its blatantly correct. Its an incredibly common occurence that British media uses "The Republic of Ireland" rather than acknowledge that there is one country called Ireland and another called Northern Ireland. If the aim is to distinguish between the two then "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" is a far more accurate way of doing so.
::Would also add that the use of "The Republic of Ireland" has fallen out of use drastically in the last 10-20 years. You may have noticed that in the 2000s that when selecting your nationality from a list Ireland would be listed as "The Republic of Ireland", this something that has become very uncommon in recent years.
::Personally I find the use of "The Republic of Ireland" to be completely against the mission statement of Misplaced Pages to deliver unbiased information. Ireland is one country and its name is stated in its constitution. It should be referred to as such. Feel free to have your own opinions on it but those would be your opinions and not in line with the identity of the nation as outlined in its constitution. There is an exceptionally long history since the days of home rule of refusal by the British government to use the correct name for Ireland in an effort to make it seem more of secession rather than a regaining of independence. ] (]) 14:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I have even experienced that British people (i.e. British Airways staff) called it Southern Ireland. But please note that ] links to the island and not to a country. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 16:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:We have a guideline on this: see ]. The first bullet point is why "Republic of Ireland" is used here. ] ] 16:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)


== Use of the term "Statesman" ==
...these are from the Guardian online. Yes, very disappointing for the faithful who will be unable to delete my additions in that mildly condescending and naturally arrogant dismissal of a newspaper that ironically always boasted about having helped put her where she was :p as the Guardian is perceived to conform to ]... here ya go. PS: Think Galloway might win the prize for tactful tweet of the hour {{wink}}
Of course, they're not all 'world-leaders' (ironically, very few today actually ''knew'' or worked with her), but they ''are'' well-known and easilly verifiable...


Misplaced Pages defines a statesman/woman as:
<blockquote>]-'Margaret Thatcher was an extraordinary woman but she was extraordinary for mostly the wrong reasons.'</br>
]- 'Margaret Thatcher was the most divisive and destructive Prime Minister of modern times. Mass Unemployment, factory closures, communities destroyed – this is her legacy. She was a fighter and her enemy was the British working class'
</br>] -'Margaret Thatcher did great hurt to the Irish and British people during her time as British prime minister. Working class communities were devastated in Britain because of her policies.'
</br>]- 'Tramp the dirt down' & 'Thatcher described Nelson Mandela as a "terrorist". I was there. I saw her lips move. May she burn in the hellfires.'
</br>]- 'She created today's housing crisis. She created the banking crisis. And she created the benefits crisis. It was her government that started putting people on incapacity benefit rather than register them as unemployed because the Britain she inherited was broadly full employment. She decided when she wrote off our manufacturing industry that she could live with two or three million unemployed, and the benefits bill, the legacy of that, we are struggling with today. In actual fact, every real problem we face today is the legacy of the fact that she was fundamentally wrong'</blockquote>


A ] or a leader in an organization who has had a long and respected career at the national or international level.
And in case anyone thinks that's ''too'' one-sided....? A very '''supportive''' one from ], of course- !!! </br>
<font face="Georgia">]<sub>]</font> 17:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


Merriam-Webster:
{{RPA}}


A wise, skillful, and respected political leader
Those are referenced quotes that conform to verifiability standards, whether you appprove or not. Your contribution seems to rely on talking about your ]. Go troll elsewhere, anon. <font face="Georgia">]<sub>]</font> 17:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


I am commenting of Thatcher specifically, but many historical politicians are referred to as Statespeople on this site and I think it's unobjective to say that any controversial historical figure was "Wise, skillful, and respected." In my opinion, this line should be removed and politician may suffice. ] (]) 02:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Don't dispute the verifiability. {{RPA}} Stop it.
:I would tend to agree, but it's probably something that needs to be raised more widely e.g. at ]. <span style=white-space:nowrap;>] <span style="background-color:lavender;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black">]</span></span> 03:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:It's sourced in the article body. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the line. &#8209;&#8209;] (] <b>·</b> ] <b>·</b> ]) 18:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)


== Requested grammar fix ==
== celebrations of her death in the UK: Widely reported. Highly unusual. Why aren't they even mentioned? ==


"As well working with the CIA in Operation Cyclone ..."
As can be seen, https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=uk&tbm=nws&q=thatcher+celebration&oq=thatcher+celebration&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.13511.19613.0.19779.20.4.0.16.16.0.119.351.3j1.4.0...0.0...1ac.1.D8AtSNMIcpg#hl=en&safe=off&gl=uk&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=thatcher+celebration+dead&oq=thatcher+celebration+dead&gs_l=serp.3...23000.24453.1.25259.5.5.0.0.0.0.121.531.2j3.5.0...0.0...1c.1.8.psy-ab.BqVOLf2AkMY&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44770516,d.d2k&fp=e7cea0d1593531a2&biw=1440&bih=737 a lot of newspapers and other reliable news sources are covering the outpourings of jubilation at Thatcher's death. Few major British news sources are ''not'' covering this.


That should be "As well '''as''' working with the CIA in Operation Cyclone ..."
I cannot see how it isn't a straight violation of POV ''not'' to mention them. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 18:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


] (]) 13:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
== Biased entry ==


:Fixed. ] (]) 13:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Thatcher did not revitalise the UK economy, she annihilated it, which is why we are in such a mess now as she decimated the manufacturing industries. Curbing the unions was not the good thing portrayed here either. I must've lived in a completely different UK in the 1980's than the author of this rubbish.

Latest revision as of 23:27, 23 December 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Margaret Thatcher article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former featured articleMargaret Thatcher is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleMargaret Thatcher has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 18, 2005.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
July 24, 2006Featured article reviewKept
July 11, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
November 29, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
December 23, 2008Good article nomineeListed
January 12, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
January 9, 2011Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2012Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 18, 2012Good article reassessmentListed
June 12, 2013Good article reassessmentKept
June 24, 2018WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 8, 2013.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 4, 2004, October 12, 2004, May 4, 2007, May 4, 2008, May 4, 2009, May 4, 2011, May 4, 2012, May 4, 2016, May 4, 2019, May 4, 2023, and May 4, 2024.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government / Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconLincolnshire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: British / European / Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject iconCold War High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLondon High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUniversity of Oxford Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen scientists Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEngland High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
          Other talk page banners
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 10,401,057 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 7 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
Section sizes
Section size for Margaret Thatcher (47 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 11,657 11,657
Early life and education 1,083 19,488
Family and childhood (1925–1943) 4,546 4,546
Oxford (1943–1947) 6,715 6,715
Post-Oxford career (1947–1951) 7,144 7,144
Early political career 2,013 33,333
Member of Parliament (1959–1970) 1,928 9,666
On the frontbenches 3,987 3,987
In the Shadow Cabinet 3,751 3,751
Education Secretary (1970–1974) 5,318 5,318
Leader of the Opposition (1975–1979) 12,659 16,336
"Iron Lady" 3,677 3,677
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979–1990) 1,876 81,121
Domestic affairs 23 35,638
Minorities 3,172 3,172
The Queen 1,569 1,569
Economy and taxation 12,233 12,233
Industrial relations 8,228 8,228
Privatisation 4,576 4,576
Northern Ireland 5,837 5,837
Environment 2,890 2,890
Foreign affairs 1,726 30,656
Cold War 5,013 5,013
Ties with the US 9,884 9,884
Crisis in the South Atlantic 3,459 3,459
Negotiating Hong Kong 911 911
Apartheid in South Africa 3,044 3,044
Europe 6,619 6,619
Challenges to leadership and resignation 10,061 10,061
Later life 16 36,845
Return to backbenches (1990–1992) 1,497 1,497
Post-Commons (1992–2003) 16,170 16,170
Final years (2003–2013) 11,950 11,950
Death and funeral (2013) 7,212 7,212
Legacy 12 36,980
Political impact 4,353 28,823
Overview 14,105 14,105
Reputation 10,365 10,365
Cultural depictions 8,145 8,145
Titles, awards and honours 10,464 10,464
Published works 691 691
See also 271 271
References 16 31,864
Explanatory notes 484 484
Citations 1,006 1,006
General bibliography 30,358 30,358
External links 8,169 8,169
Total 270,883 270,883
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:


Margaret Thatcher's name

I tried correcting Margaret Thatcher's name in the infobox to "Margaret Thatcher" as someone had set it to "The Baroness Thatcher", but this was reverted. I'm pretty sure her first name isn't "The". According to the template documentation at infobox person, the name parameter is for "Common name of person", not their title. Nosferattus (talk) 21:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Perhaps these infobox templates need an honorific_prefix_2 parameter. What is your take on this situation, Right Honourable Sir Neveselbert? I took a look at Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Biography and it says "In general, honorific prefixes and suffixes should not be included, but may be discussed in the article." However, it does make an exception for including Sir, Dame, Lord and Lady in infoboxes (without explaining why). Nosferattus (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
You didn't correct anything. Her title was The Baroness Thatcher; see members.parliament.uk/member/953/career. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
@Neveselbert: That page says "Her full title was The Rt Hon. the Baroness Thatcher LG OM. Her name was Margaret Hilda Thatcher." The name parameter, as I'm sure you know, is for a person's name, not their title. What am I missing here? Nosferattus (talk) 21:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
@Neveselbert: Do you still object to changing the name parameter to "Margaret Thatcher"? Nosferattus (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes. It's standard across infoboxes of all articles for British peers to use their name in the peerage. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
If put to an RfC, I expect the wider community would not support highlighting this much less globally known title in the infobox. Past sentiment to that effect can be found here and here. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 16:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Ireland vs The Republic of Ireland

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979–1990) > Northern Ireland > Paragraph 3 > line 3

"The Republic of Ireland" should read "Ireland". There are two countries on the Island of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" should be used to avoid ambiguity. As per article 4 of the Irish constitution the name of the state is "Éire" or, in English, "Ireland".

"The Republic of" is a descriptor of the type of state Ireland is and not the correct term at all when referring to the country regardless of how often it is incorrectly used. Revlon1997 (talk) 12:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

I think it's best to use Republic of Ireland on articles like this to avoid confusion regarding the Northern Ireland situation. After all, the consensus on the rest of Misplaced Pages seems to be that we use Ireland for the geographical island of the same name with both countries and Republic of Ireland for the sovereign state of the same name outside the UK (see the Republic of Ireland article and the Ireland article and other articles related to the matter, e.g. Republic of Ireland–United Kingdom border, Republic of Ireland at the UEFA European Championship). It's a relatively minor thing in the grander scheme of things, with people from both the islands of Ireland and Great Britain using the term Republic of Ireland for the sovereign state. Again, this also helps avoid confusion with the Northern Ireland situation, as Northern Ireland is governed by the UK and not the Republic, which was the same situation back when Thatcher was around. Therefore, I don't really see a reason to change the name used on the article here. ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 13:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
You think its best but its blatantly correct. Its an incredibly common occurence that British media uses "The Republic of Ireland" rather than acknowledge that there is one country called Ireland and another called Northern Ireland. If the aim is to distinguish between the two then "The Country of Ireland" and "The Island of Ireland" is a far more accurate way of doing so.
Would also add that the use of "The Republic of Ireland" has fallen out of use drastically in the last 10-20 years. You may have noticed that in the 2000s that when selecting your nationality from a list Ireland would be listed as "The Republic of Ireland", this something that has become very uncommon in recent years.
Personally I find the use of "The Republic of Ireland" to be completely against the mission statement of Misplaced Pages to deliver unbiased information. Ireland is one country and its name is stated in its constitution. It should be referred to as such. Feel free to have your own opinions on it but those would be your opinions and not in line with the identity of the nation as outlined in its constitution. There is an exceptionally long history since the days of home rule of refusal by the British government to use the correct name for Ireland in an effort to make it seem more of secession rather than a regaining of independence. Revlon1997 (talk) 14:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I have even experienced that British people (i.e. British Airways staff) called it Southern Ireland. But please note that Ireland links to the island and not to a country. The Banner talk 16:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
We have a guideline on this: see WP:IRE-IRL. The first bullet point is why "Republic of Ireland" is used here. Proteus (Talk) 16:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Use of the term "Statesman"

Misplaced Pages defines a statesman/woman as:

A politician or a leader in an organization who has had a long and respected career at the national or international level.

Merriam-Webster:

A wise, skillful, and respected political leader

I am commenting of Thatcher specifically, but many historical politicians are referred to as Statespeople on this site and I think it's unobjective to say that any controversial historical figure was "Wise, skillful, and respected." In my opinion, this line should be removed and politician may suffice. Milfiresices (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I would tend to agree, but it's probably something that needs to be raised more widely e.g. at WP:POLITICS. I T B F 💬 03:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
It's sourced in the article body. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the line. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Requested grammar fix

"As well working with the CIA in Operation Cyclone ..."

That should be "As well as working with the CIA in Operation Cyclone ..."

203.211.108.137 (talk) 13:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. Chewings72 (talk) 13:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories: