Misplaced Pages

User talk:Maurice Carbonaro: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:24, 10 April 2013 editMaurice Carbonaro (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,590 edits Answering Jake Wartenberg← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:59, 27 January 2020 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,784 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Lahti Summit. (TW) 
(93 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="text-align: center;">{{Pic of the day}}</div>
{{essay-like|section|date=March 2013}}
<div style="text-align: center;">{{userlinks|Maurice Carbonaro}}</div>
{{essay-like|section|date=May 2013}}
{{specific|date=October 2015}}
{{Editabuselinks|state=collapsed}} {{Editabuselinks|state=collapsed}}
{{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines|state=collapsed}} {{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines|state=collapsed}}
{{Wikipediholicism|state=collapsed}}
{| class="infobox" width="270px" {| class="infobox" width="270px"
|- |-
!align="center" colspan="2"|{{nowrap begin}} !align="center" colspan="2"|{{nowrap begin}}] ]{{nowrap end}}<br/>
]
]
{{nowrap end}}<br/>
''']''' ''']'''
<inputbox> <inputbox>
Line 17: Line 18:
---- ----
|- |-
|<center> |<div style="text-align: center;">
]<br>
]<br>
]<br>
]<br>
]<br>
]<br> ]<br>
]<br> ]<br>
Line 26: Line 32:
]<br> ]<br>
<!--]<br>--> <!--]<br>-->
</center> </div>
|} |}
<!--Template:Archivebox ends-->
</center>
</div><!--Template:Archivebox ends-->
{{deindent}}A friendly {{tps}}<br />'''Good morning Maurice, my dear friend!'''<br />Firstly, I support your comments above throughout this thread entirely. Secondly,<br />'''Merry Christmas and a happy 2013'''<br />
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">
]
]




== All the best for 2017! ==
<!-- **************************************************************** -->
<!-- ********** TALK PAGE STARTS HERE ********************* -->
<!-- **************************************************************** -->


<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:white; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; {{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />round corners}};" class="plainlinks">]
'''Greetings!'''
'''Hello {{{user|{{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}}}},<br />'''Enjoy the ''']''' and the ''']'''.<br />Thank you for all your good work during 2016 in maintaining, improving and expanding ].<br />All the best for 2017! Cheers, —&nbsp;<strong>]</strong>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp; 16:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
'']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Buzzard''</span>{{spaced ndash}}is wishing you ]<br />Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ]<br />], ], ], ], ],<br />or the ],<br /> this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.<br />
]{{paragraph break}}
<br />
{{clear}}
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:pink; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:9px;" class="plainlinks">
]
:'''Hi!'''<br />&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<br />&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<strong>]</strong> &#124;<small>]</small>&#124;<br />gives you this ]!<br />Puppies promote ] and I hope this little fellow/girl <sup>''(your choice)''</sup> has made your day better.<br />Remember! Your puppy must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever.<br /><br />Merry Christmas and a happy 2013<br />11:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
</div> </div>
{{paragraph break}}
:Thank you ]]<span style="color:#CC5500">Buzzard''</span>{{spaced ndash}},<br>what a nice surprise! Merry Xmas and Happy New Year to you too.!<br>] ] 16:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
== Before posting messages, please check if...==
::Ha,ha! I am glad it pleased you. What a wonderful signature, Maurice!<br />Cheers!&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<br />&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<strong>]</strong> &#124;<small>]</small>&#124; 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
== ...<nowiki>{{</nowiki>'']''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> first ==
:::* Re- <u>your post today (User page) today</u><br />My dear friend ] ]<br />Please don't! We have a saying in Britain, "Don't let the buggers grind you down!"<br />{{spaced ndash}}]]<span style="color:#CC5500">Buzzard''</span>{{spaced ndash}}14:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)<br>
[[Image:Fused Electrical Filament SEM Stereo 50x.JPG|thumb|left|350px|<div style="text-align: center;">Before posting a message please check if the...<br></div>
:::::Hallo there {{spaced ndash}}]]<span style="color:#CC5500">Buzzard''</span>{{spaced ndash}}, thanks for showing support. Unfortunately I don't think that your use of ] could help me in resolving disputes. Maybe it could even escalate them. Please feel free to email-me privately as we did in the past instead. Catch you L8R. ] ] 09:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)</div></div>
<big><div style="text-align: center;"><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>.</div></big>
<div style="text-align: center;">If so please keep me posted while I am not online...</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">...''or ]!''</div>
<small><div style="text-align: center;">{{3d glasses}}</div></small>
<small>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: 6pt; color: #ffffff; text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
</small>]]
<br/>


== NPOV? ==


<!-- ******************************************************************* -->
Agreeing with all editors who have so far commented that:
<!-- ************************* HALLO THERE! ************************* -->
#Your addition of line breaks is '''not''' helpful.
<!-- * Please consider sending me an e-mail before posting publicly. *** -->
#Your conversion of bulleted lists to numbered lists is rarely helpful.
<!-- *** Or using ] encrypting technology ***** -->
#Most of your contributions are irrelevant to the article (and that fact can been seen by anyone with a basic knowledge of the English language)
<!-- *** if you think it's the case: hushmail, for example, *** -->
#Many of your contributions are ungrammatical and undecipherable.
<!-- ** it's quite easy to use compared to PGP or GNU Privacy Guard ** -->
<!-- ************ If so, just add the following template. ************** -->
<!-- ******************************************************************* -->
<!-- {{you've got mail}} -->
<!-- ******************************************************************* -->
<!-- ************************* Thanks. **************************** -->
<!-- ******************************************************************* -->


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
and reverting such contributions is not an NPOV violation. I would consider bringing a RfC/User about those edits of yours, but that process is not really set up for multiple types of errors introduced by a single user, as I'd have to come up with a separate certifier for each type of error. — ] ] 08:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
:Hallo there ] ],<br>
:AFAIC you can agree with whoever you feel like.
# Please be more specific about my '''not''' helpful line breaks. Is there some '''absolute''' rule specified about the line breaks usage in the ] that I didn't follow? Whenever the line breaks that I have inserted were '''not''' helpful AFAIC the matter has been discussed and solved. The "] or ] ? comments on talk pages that I have recently posted have nothing to do with line breaks.
#As stated before you seem to highlight the "not helpful" sides of my contributions on Misplaced Pages and you have '''*NEVER*''' mentioned one '''*SINGLE*''' positive thing I have done in the last 10 years. You are not *Mr. Perfection*. ] states <tt>"(...) Administrators should strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy and civility to other editors and to one another (...)".</tt>
# You stated in your on the ] @ 11:28, the 17th December 2012: <tt>"Reverted ] edits by Maurice Carbonaro (talk): Too diff'''<big>e</big>'''cult to separate the bad edits from the good; my score is 2 bad, 4 neutral, 1 (perhaps) good. ([[WP:T... (...)"</tt> that is, IMHO, '''your''' opinion. '''My''' opinion is <tt>2 good, 4 neutral, 1 (perhaps) bad</tt>.
# I have posted a ] so we can compare other comments about my "irrelevant ungrammatical and undecipherable contributions" to the articles (because you know how to spell right?) But let's suppose for a moment that my English was *really* poor: shouldn't a wikipedia administrator address users with a *basic* knowledge of English to the ] or not?,
:IMHO you should decide between being *mainly* and <tt><big>]</big></tt> '''or''' mainly an <tt><big>administrator</big></tt> because it looks like you are ]. Your behaviour would be acceptable if you were an editor without ].<br>
:AFAIC Administrators should generally intervene in disputes when requested and not ] editors like you have been doing with me for months now.<br>
:I hope this helps.
:Thanks for being "welcoming".<br>
:] ] 09:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
::It is standard practice for editors to periodically review edits made by someone after they have been identified as possibly causing problems. Please talk only about the <u>issues</u> raised (adding line breaks; converting bulleted lists; mostly irrelevant contributions; ungrammatical and undecipherable). For example, your comments above and at ] are totally inappropriate: the admin status of another editor is not relevant; Misplaced Pages does not have a set of rules to cover every situation; it is part of the job of any editor that unhelpful edits must be resisted to avoid degradation of the encyclopedia. Your edit at ] ({{diff|Fornax|prev|535841704|diff}}) inserted the underlined text in {{quote|'''Fornax''' is a ] in the southern sky <u>of the ]</u>.}} To discuss that revert on the talk page, please talk about the ''edit'' and not the person who reverted you (reverting and discussion is standard practice at Misplaced Pages). The heading you chose for the talk page ("] or ]?") makes no sense—the two links go to the same page; the two links are totally irrelevant; the heading is nothing to do with the edit or the reversion. Please read and try to understand policy pages before linking to them—] has nothing to do with a disagreement between two editors over whether "of the ]" belongs in the article above. Have you read and understood the linked article? Do you believe it is relevant to ]? That is what should be discussed at ]. This account was created in October 2006 so there is no point in a "welcome" now—what should an editor do if they notice another user who is degrading articles? ] (]) 11:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
:::IMHO This is the ] I would rather prefere <tt><big>]s</tt></big> should use with other editors (please mind that i'm not saying yours is "<tt><big>]</big></tt>'"). I am starting to believe that I should become more involved with <tt><big>]</tt></big>. Please keep me posted in case you have intention to become an <big><tt>]</big></tt> in the future and I will surely endorse your election. It's just that I didn't stand Rubin's general attitude towards me right from the beginning because it seems that he tends to escalate tensions up to the point that we end up in mutal <big><tt>]</big></TT>s (''<tt>"Your English knowledge is bad"'', ''"You clearly haven't got a clue of what you are doing"</tt>'' and so on). AFAIC he definitely needs a ]. ] ] 12:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
:::::I've ''tried'' dicussing your edits with you. You doesn't understand what ''I'' consider basic (and, in some cases, even ''simple'') English, and, as you (have) claimed to be a native English speaker, it would be in bad taste to suggest to suggest further that you need help with English, especially after I'd done so a number of times.
:::::As for spelling; Twinkle rollback exempts the "reason" field from ANY spell-checkers, including those built in to the browser. I correct spelling in my comments when I notice it, but correcting spelling in edit summaries is not possible once the edit is completed. — ] ] 16:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
::::::] on the planet is given free access to the sum of all pigeon knowledge.<br>
That's what the ] above is doing... using ].<br>
Maybe you think this is ]?<br>
Well... now imagine if ].]]I appreciate that you ''tried'' discussing my edits with me: that's what talk pages are supposed to be there for. I have noticed that ''italic type'' that you inserted for the "tried" word which usually it's meant to change the ]: maybe you meant to ] your attempts? If you '''''doesn't''''' think my English is that one of a native but ''bahseek and seempol, whot kan eye sey ] ]? Maee-bee eye shoody putty userboxxy dat I havvy ] insteddy andy thatty I laik smoukin pot?''. BTW I removed *that* "native english" userbox some days ago because you keep going back to this claim of mine instilling doubt that my English is not that one of a native: it would be strongly appreciated if you would '''*think*''' about removing the "pot smoking-bigotry userbox". But... wait a sec, please: aren't these '']'' ]? Shouldn't we be focusing on the articles and not on the contributors? Twinkle here, twinkle there, edit summaries... whatever, okay: let's both seriously consider about consensually bringing these matters to ] and seriously try to end these slow paced personal attacks once for ever. Please let's try to have a relaxed week-end. Cheers. ] ] 17:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Maurice Carbonaro. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
== ] ==

I don't recall whether I've talked to you about this before, but '''all''' your edits are marked as ]. This clearly violates the guidelines, unless you consider your edits to have no value.... — ] ] 16:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
:No, you never talked to me about this before and yes '''all'' my edits are marked by ]. I appreciate you making me notice this and will try to make my edits ]. BTW the fact that "you don't recall" should be a warning that you have serious *Working Overloads* with your "volunteering" on Misplaced Pages. As I stated before everyone here on Misplaced Pages is a volunteer.... or should be one. You sound treating other editors like they are regulary employed with a fixed wage where you are the employer... Cheers.<br>
:] ] 17:56, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
::If I warned you in 2006 or 2010, I shouldn't be expected to remember....and your talk page is too active to be sure that a warning hasn't previously been given in the archives, or in something which you deleted rather than archive. — ] ] 03:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
::: is not a minor edit. Please don't mark all of your edits as minor. -- <font color="#000080">Mufka</font> ] ] ] 11:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

For the third time, '''please do not mark all of your edits as minor'''. Per ], ''"any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit concerns a single word"''. Marking genuinely uncontroversial wikilinking as minor is fine, but policy explicitly says that anything which , , or that , should not be flagged in this way, as other editors may overlook your edit. If you are unsure whether or not your edits count as minor, it would be better to simply mark ''none'' of them as minor. --] (]) 15:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
:Opz sorry: I apologize. <nowiki>:/</nowiki> Bad habits are hard to quit. Unfortunately up to a while ago I considered "minor" these changes compared to other editors changes that were making substanstial changes to articles modifying entire paragraphs. Have you noticed anything positive that I have done recently too?<br>
:] ] 07:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
::May I suggest that you add a script to your personal .js which prevents you from marking an edit "minor"? You're still doing it. Since you seem to be unaware that your Wikilinks are ], and hence not-at-all minor, and seem to be unaware that some of your (apparently minor) changes in word choice significantly affect the meaning of the sentence, it might be best for you to ''prevent'' yourself from marking an edit "minor". — ] ] 09:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
:::Hallo there Rubin. The fact that (some) of my Wikilinks are ] seems to me ]. For example on ] where you reverted my edit for this reason... but for the sake of peace I will pretend that some of my wikilinks are the so called "easter eggs".<br>
::: As for automated scripts (which it seems you use a lot for "checking" other users edits) I honestly don't like them so I will try harder to concentrate in marking "minor" what's "minor" (for me) hoping that someone else will not loose his/her ] in taking them for "Major".<br>
:::I know how lately it has been difficult is to find Administrators volunteering for Misplaced Pages. For example I don't long for being one. Maybe because it is generally considered to be a bit too stressing(?). May I please suggest you to stop ] me and intervene just when someone eventually formally complains for my behaviour calling an administrator? Actually what you can do in this case is just a ] because you have been ] with me lately. Well, let's agree to disagree that I will not have properly answered on talk pages first... I am saying that for you because in keeping this behaviour I wonder how can you get all this burden and sleep properly at night. Haven't you also got the problem of looking for a job? As well could you please try to be also positive when talking to other editors? It just seems to me that 99,99% of the time you are out there pointing out the "bad stuff" that other people do. Obviously ] doesn't apply with you because I have been on Misplaced Pages three years more than you so, IMHO, you are the "newbie" here and I should be the one trying not to "bite" you. Thanks. Let's try to have a nice and relaxed week-end.<br>
:::] ] 09:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
::::I follow you around because it's still the case that more of your edits are wrong than are appropriate. In fact, for many of the edits, I cannot conceive anyone with a professional knowledge of English failing to understand that the edits are wrong. Quoting from ]:
:::::Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or '''correcting related problems on multiple articles.'''
::::''Your'' related problems include wikilinking to a similarly-named, but completely different, concept; and (as]) did) adding indirectly related, or similarly named to potentiall related, articles to "see also". — ] ] 19:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
].</small>]]
:::::With all those "'''''<big>My</big>''' related problems"'' what should I do then? Set an appointment with a '']''? Oh well... just in case you didn't catch my drift that was a ]. I am not in the mood for other ]s from you today. BTW, have you recently ?<br>
:::::] ] 11:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)<br>
::::::It's not a personal attack, merely observations on your edits. And the YouTube guy is banned from all Foundation projects, not just en.Misplaced Pages. If you think I have any influence to suggest that if he wasn't an idiot, you would be crazy. — ] ] 12:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

==]==
[[File:Face-confused.svg|thumb|right|200px|I am formally apologizing.<br>
I have never done such a thing before and I will never again.<br>
Please trust me.<br><center>] ]</center>
<center>12:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)</center>]]
]
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that ] wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the page and state your intention on the article's ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Redirtypo-warn --> ] (]) 12:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

:Redirecting a political phrase to ] might strike you as funny, but Misplaced Pages is not a joke book, and making a redirect which you know someone else will have to repair ("Obviously... please feel ABSOLUTELY free to undo... :O)") doesn't help the project. If there's nowhere meaningful to redirect a redlink, just leave it as it is so that other editors can consider creating the article, or remove the link. --] (]) 12:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
] 1978 membership to the P2 secret masonic lodge that ] he bypassed in a so called "multi-party system"...<br>
'''*''' ],<br>
'''*''' ] and<br>
'''*''' ].]]
::As I stated b4 I am really sorry about it.<br>
::Redirecting what is portrayed as a "political coalition" to a ] known as "]" is not funny at all:<br>
maybe I should have redirected "]" to "]" instead.<br>
<tt><big><center>'''But enough is enough.'''</center></tt></big>
::It seems like noone found it funny because, actually, it's '''''tragic''''' and not '''''funny''''' that who has been several times the ] had membership card # 1816 to a secret freemasonry in what is widely believed to be a "] ] with a ]" in a "]".<br>
What's all this fuss about ''''']''''' for the ] at the end of this week?<br>
::] ] 18:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
{{-}}

"As I stated b4 I am really sorry about it." - I know it's hard to follow conversations where one person is using floating image captions for their comments, but your only response at the time I left that comment had been to say "Hey, come on... that woz funny! :D I didn't mean to be cheeky... :O/" on my talk page. It looks like somebody has stepped up and tried to write a ] article now - perhaps you could contribute if you have an interest in the subject? --] (]) 18:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

== Your comments are invited on four current FDC proposals ==

Hello! As you may know, we've opened the community review period for the current funding round in the Funds Dissemination Committee process. I noticed that in the past you expressed interest in the FDC, since you were a nominee for the ombudsperson. I'd like to invite you to review the ''']''' (totaling $1.3 million USD) that were submitted to the FDC, and to ask questions and share comments about those proposals. You can help to ensure that they have high potential for impact regarding the movement's goals. The FDC especially values comments by community members and will take them into account when they prepare their recommendations. Let me know if you have any questions! --], 22:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0382 -->


== March 2013 ==

Why did you add {{xt|'']''}} next to "rector" in the infobox at ]? This is an encyclopedia and not the place for jokes.

Also, please find out the purpose of links on Misplaced Pages. As has been explained on several occasions, articles should ''not'' link words just because a link can be dreamt up. ] (]) 10:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I see you created ] as a redirect to ]. Please stop such disruption to the encyclopedia. ] (]) 10:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
== Answer attempt to "March 2013" justified public scolding by ] (]) ==
:Hallo there ] (]),<br>
thanks for leaving a message on this talk page.<br>
I will try my best to respond to your "March 2013" '''''comments''''' once per time:<br>
#I have added {{xt|'']''}} next to "rector" in the infobox at the ] article because "Mr Recca" resignation were the consequences of a political scandal that saw him involved. I am not willing to explain in details what happened because honestly I don't feel in the mood for it. If you are interested please feel free to google <tt></tt> keywords and have the news articles translated in ] with some automated software (no, '''''fortunately''''' there are '''NO''' other mainstream global media articles about him in other languages).<br>
#As for creating the ] page as a redirect to ] I have stated very clearly in the ] page that my aim was to have the ] thought experiment more popularized and one of the ways of doing so is to make the very-'''VERY''' technical subject funny. Unfortunately it hasn't been appreciated.... ] (]) is back again scolding me in public for (allegedly) misbehaving...
#BTW I hope that the ''']''' that you are advertising on your user page is not ] because this could take you directly to ].<br>
Please let's all try to have a nice and relaxed week-end.<br>
Best of all.<br>
] ] 11:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

:Even if your facts were correct, that link is (as usual) inappropriate. In addition, if you are not willing to supply a source, it would be a BLP violation even if reported properly. — ] ] 14:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
== Schrödinger's pussy listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Schrödinger's pussy'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> &nbsp;] 09:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

Hello. Your comment on MZMcBride's talk page lead me here, and after reading the last several months' worth of comments and your contributions I am appalled by what I have found. The first problem is that the majority of your contributions are not constructive. This would be less troubling if they spanned a shorter period of time, or other editors had not made so many fruitless attempts to guide you toward making more useful edits.

The second problem is tone of your interactions with these users. When another editor raises a valid concern, your response is typically combative. You mock them, cite irrelevant policies in a disingenuous manner, and make ad hominems. I did not come across a single occasion where, when another user approached you about a problem with your editing, you took their concern seriously. One recent example is your interaction with Johnuniq. When this editor approached you about you about a BLP violation that you introduced into ], you refused explain the rationale behind your edits, writing, "honestly I don't feel in the mood for it." You then threatened to report Johnuniq to ANI over an innocuous link on his userpage.

It is never appropriate to insert humor into the encyclopedia. The redirect you created at ] looks like it may be kept under the rationale that it is harmless, but the general pattern that it represents is not acceptable. Links that you create need be in compliance with ]. When editors criticize your actions, you need to make an effort to learn from what they are telling you rather than responding with attacks and sarcasm.

I have blocked you from editing in order to prevent further disruption to Misplaced Pages. It is not in the best interests of this project for you to be allowed to edit unless you can indicate that you understand the above and agree to drastically change your behavior. ⇌ ] ] 07:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
== Answer 2 block ==
Hallo there ] ],<br>
I understand the above and agree to drastically change my behavior.<br>
In the future please consider stating what's allegedly "going wrong" before drastically blocking users.<br>
Thanks.<br>
] ] 07:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

== Before posting messages, please check if <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> first ==
[[Image:Fused Electrical Filament SEM Stereo 50x.JPG|thumb|left|350px|<center>Before posting a message please check if the...<br></center>
<big><center><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>.</center></big>
<center>If so please keep me posted while I am not online...</center>
<center>...''or ]!''</center>
<small><center>{{3d glasses}}</small></center>
<small>
<center>
<div style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: 6pt; color: #ffffff; text-align: center;">
</small>
</center>
</div>]]
<br/>


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
<!-- ******************************************************************-->
<!-- ************************ HALLO THERE! *************************-->
<!-- * Please consider sending me an e-mail before posting publicly. * -->
<!-- * Or using ] encrypting technology *--->
<!-- * if you think it's the case: hushmail, for example, *-->
<!-- * it's quite easy to use compared to PGP or GNU Privacy Guard *-->
<!-- ************ If so, just add the following template. *************-->
<!-- {{you've got mail}} -->
<!-- ************************* Thanks. ***************************-->
<!-- ******************************************************************-->
{{-}}{{-}}{{-}}{{-}}


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for March 31==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 -->


== ] ==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 20:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC) Hello Maurice, please have a look ] and leave your opinion if interested. Thank you. ] (]) 11:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
:* {{done}}&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<br />&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<strong>]</strong> &#124;<small>]</small>&#124; 20:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
<blockquote>No evidence this event was (is) independently notable</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
== TYS ==
Hello,


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
I notice that you've added the userbox for the ] to your page. Can you tell me please what your user name was when you began editing? Thanks. — ] ] 15:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
:*How? Considering the "Indefinite" block {{mdash}} <small>Friendly</small> {{TPS}}&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<br />&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<strong>]</strong> &#124;<small>]</small>&#124; 19:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
:::This user's talk page access has not been revoked. If there is no response after a while I will simply remove it. — ] ] 02:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
::::Thank you.<br />Sincerely,<br />{{mdash}} ]]]{{spaced ndash}}09:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 21:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
According to his user page Maurice was ]. ⇌ ] ] 18:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks - I missed that. Tiny font! So wow, longer than me. Maurice, if you're reading this - sorry if I seemed harsh; it's just that I spotted a sockpuppet using the userbox recently, so wanted to double-check. I hope you manage to work out the issues that lead to you being blocked. — ] ] 20:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::Again, thank you Hex&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<br />&nbsp;&ndash;&#32;<strong>]</strong> &#124;<small>]</small>&#124; 20:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:59, 27 January 2020

Picture of the day Reduced Gravity Walking Simulator The Reduced Gravity Walking Simulator was a facility developed by NASA in the early 1960s to study human movement under simulated lunar gravity conditions. It was located at NASA's Langley Research Center in Virginia and was designed to prepare astronauts for the Moon landings during the Apollo program. The simulator was tilted at a 9.5-degree angle from the vertical and test subjects were suspended on their side by cables at the same angle. This set-up allowed the trainees to walk along the surface while experiencing only one-sixth of Earth's gravity. It was also used to study the physiological effects on the astronaut's body during movement. In total, 24 astronauts used the simulator to train for lunar missions, including all three astronauts of the Apollo 1 mission. This photograph, taken in 1963, shows a test subject being suited up by two technicians on the Reduced Gravity Walking Simulator.Photograph credit: NASA Archive – More featured pictures... Maurice Carbonaro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
This section is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Misplaced Pages editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (May 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article focuses too much on specific examples. Please help improve this article by adding sources that evaluate within a broader context. (October 2015)
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?)
    Content (?)
    P
    G
    Conduct (?)
    P
    G
    Deletion (?)
    P
    Enforcement (?)
    P
    Editing (?)
    P
    G
    Style
    Classification
    Project content (?)
    G
    WMF (?)
    P
    Wikipediholism
    Identification
    Analysis and
    symptoms
    Fighting
    Wikipediholism
    Wikipediholics listed by...
    Hubris Conceit

    So... you feel a bit curious today?


    012
    011
    /
    009
    008
    007
    006
    005
    004
    003
    002
    001


    All the best for 2017!

    Hello Maurice Carbonaro,
    Enjoy the Winter Solstice and the Christmas and holiday season.
    Thank you for all your good work during 2016 in maintaining, improving and expanding Misplaced Pages.
    All the best for 2017! Cheers, — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard |  16:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

    Before posting messages, please check if...

    ...{{lightbulb is out}} first

    Before posting a message please check if the...
    {{lightbulb is out}}. If so please keep me posted while I am not online... ...or I will be square! 3D red cyan glasses are recommended to view this image correctly. Please don't send me spam. Thanks. :O)



    ArbCom 2017 election voter message

    Hello, Maurice Carbonaro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

    The First Three Minutes

    Hello Maurice, please have a look here and leave your opinion if interested. Thank you. Herbmuell (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

    Proposed deletion of Lahti Summit

    Notice

    The article Lahti Summit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    No evidence this event was (is) independently notable

    While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)