Revision as of 16:18, 11 April 2013 view sourceNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits →Copernican Principle: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter: decline← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:54, 26 December 2024 view source MJL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors42,350 edits →Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: removing case as premature: declinedTag: Manual revert | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Redirect|WP:ARC|a guide on talk page archiving|H:ARC}} | |||
{{ArbComOpenTasks}}__TOC__{{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{-}} | |||
</noinclude> | |||
<includeonly>= ] =</includeonly><noinclude>{{If mobile||{{Fake heading|sub=1|Requests for arbitration}}}}</noinclude> | |||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | |||
{{NOINDEX}} | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width= |
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} | ||
<noinclude>{{-}}</noinclude> | |||
== Copernican Principle == | |||
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 17:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Involved parties === | |||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | |||
*{{userlinks|Wyattmj}}, ''filing party'' | |||
*{{admin|Materialscientist}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Drbogdan}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Lithopsian}} | |||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | |||
*] | |||
=== Statement by Wyattmj === | |||
I am requesting arbitration on this case. On the talk page I have attempted discussion, but gotten very little if any. The jist is the following: | |||
These editors (materialscientist, Drbogdan, and Lithopsian especially) keep reverting my edits; though well thought out and documented. They keep telling me to go to talk, and weeks go by, and no one discusses this. I will take this further. These guys are basically trying to sweep the truth under the rug and use Misplaced Pages to lie to the public. Let them ban me. They are liars at best, and probably much worse, and are making a fool of Misplaced Pages. Every cosmologist knows that what I am saying is true, but the establishment cosmologist who want to protect billions in funding wants to whitewash the truth. Is this what Misplaced Pages is about? Call any cosmologist you know, and ask if the CMB anisotropies and correlation to the ecliptic are an issue for LCDM, big bang, or inflation, and if they have an ounce of integrity they will tell you yes. Read the references I supplied. The truth is breaking out, but apparently not on Misplaced Pages- the last ditch defense for the establishment. ] (]) 17:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
:@Looie496: Do not impute what I have not stated in the article to my edits. Nowhere in the article do I state this. This is a frivolous comment. Whether I believe this or not is my personal business, and please stick to the edits in question. Please talk to a qualified cosmologist. The evidence is stacking up, and the Coperncian Principle is in trouble, regardless of whether the earth is in the center of the universe or not. Read the Krauss quote in the article. Even the most venomous anti-creationist alive admits it. Who the heck are you? Stephen Hawking? I cannot believe that Misplaced Pages is trampled on so easily and used to hide the truth. Most amazing and eye opening. I will try and refrain from commenting to others comments, but this is a frivolous comment.] (]) 19:09, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by Drbogdan === | |||
FWIW - my usual "edit summary" re the ] article urged a discussion on the ] - to reach ] among interested (& knowledgeable) editors per ] - as follows => - afaik this seemed appropriate at the time for the text/refs involved - please let me know if otherwise of course - in any case - Enjoy! :) ] (]) 19:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by Looie496 === | |||
I have not been involved here, but the gist of this is easy to summarize. The filing editor believes that scientific evidence supports the view that the Earth is the center of the universe, and is frustrated that his edits advocating that view are systematically reverted by the editors named. This is the very epitome of ], and I think that the community can handle it. ] (]) 18:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by MONGO === | |||
Hasty reject...suggest filer find a new playground.--] 18:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by Thryduulf === | |||
Following the filing on this page I've had a look at the topic for the first time and I concur with Looie496 above. The filer doesn't appear to understand that Misplaced Pages content is written from the neutral point of view and that this is determined by what is found in mainstream reliable sources. The view of most other editors seems to be that the POV held by the filer is so ]] that even mentioning it in the main article is bordering on ]. Whether this is the case or not I don't know, but neither is it something that arbitration can determine. Wider community input does not appear to have been sought. The filer would also do well to avoid ]. ] (]) 19:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by EdJohnston === | |||
Wyattmj has just been blocked 72 hours by ], per what looks like a routine application of the edit warring policy. By coincidence I had also opened a 3RR complaint that can be seen at ]. Since Vsmith had already acted, my report turned out not to be necessary. ] (]) 19:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Clerk notes === | |||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
=== Copernican Principle: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/5/0/0> === | |||
{{anchor|1=Copernican_Principle: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small> | |||
* This request is extremely premature. The dispute at ] can be resolved without arbitration, which is a lengthy and difficult process that is only used when all other methods fail. I suggest the filing party read ], which specifies several methods of resolving the dispute in question, and that he follow the advice given by that page. As for the disputed content, I would suggest using the ] (or if there are further problems, ] or ]). I would also counsel the filing party to adopt a less heated, confrontational tone when dealing with editors whose opinions differ from his own. Disputes are at the heart of Misplaced Pages and all collaborative projects, but getting oneself upset or annoyed when one is challenged does everybody, and the encyclopedia, a disservice. I would also remind him that, if he does not in future adopt a ] when editing this article this article, he is likely to find himself subject to sanctions by the community (or blocking by an administrator) for disruptive conduct. He should try harder to put forward his points using appropriate methods of dispute resolution and in a reasonable, clear, and professional way. As for the request for arbitration, my vote is firmly '''Decline.''' ] ]] 19:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline'''. ] (]) 19:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline'''. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline'''. AGK makes some good points which are worth reading carefully. ''']''' ''']''' 09:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline'''. ] (]) 16:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:54, 26 December 2024
"WP:ARC" redirects here. For a guide on talk page archiving, see H:ARC. Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open casesCase name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|