| Revision as of 13:51, 16 April 2013 editGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits →Talk:Power factor: Just asking for the minimum commitment I need to get the protection lifted. Nothing more.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:11, 27 November 2024 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,106 edits rv old notice Undid revision 1258260759 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Tags: Replaced Undo | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Get rid of the banner == | |||
| This page has been edited. | |||
| Does this get rid of the banner? --] (]) 22:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I would like to get the page protection lifted from ]. To do that, I am asking you to agree to not use reverts to insert your theory that there is no such thing as a negative power factor into that article without a consensus of the other editors that you are correct. You can just put the word "Agree" in the edit summary when you delete this (signifying that you agree to not insert your theory into the article; I am not asking you to agree that there is such a thing as a negative power factor) Your cooperation would be appreciated. --] (]) 02:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : But I don't agree. I've explained this to death and no matter how many Fluke user manuals I see quoted, I object to the casual assertion that power factor runs from -1 to +1. My reasons are given in detail in the talk page discussion. Maybe Mr. McEchern will fix the IEEE standard this time to clarify this. --] (]) 13:15, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::I understand that you don't agree about negative power factor, and have read your reasons why you believe that you are correct. And, of course, it might very well be true that you are 100% correct and I am completely wrong. I am not asking you to change your position on the content dispute. I am asking you to please make a commitment to not exhibit the behavior that resulted in the page being protected. I plan on asking the same from everyone involved and, armed with that information, asking for the protection to be lifted. I am not even asking you to admit that you ''did'' exhibit the behavior that resulted in the page being protected. Saying "I never violated the rules on consensus building or edit warring before, and I won't violate them for the first time if the protection is lifted" would be fine. --] (]) 13:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:11, 27 November 2024
Get rid of the banner
Does this get rid of the banner? --Wtshymanski (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)