Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:04, 26 April 2013 editSuperfly94 (talk | contribs)278 edits →World Mission Society Church of God article: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:39, 28 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,903 editsm Archiving 4 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive490) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}<noinclude>{{offer help}}{{Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}]{{User:MiszaBot/config
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 212 |counter = 490
|algo = old(48h) |algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|key = 053831e9b0c0497f371e8097fa948a81
|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude>
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid="3741656" ns="4" title="Misplaced Pages:Administrators&#039; noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) ==
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br />
== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Cardiovascular disease}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Fgmoon353}}


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
#
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# #
# #
# #
#
# <small>Added by <code>]]</code> 15:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)</small>


<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and


<u>Comments:</u> <br />


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
User was reverted twice by myself and once by ClueBot. He continues to remove content supported by review articles. His edits are a little hard to follow. In this one for example he changes the conclusions to "Clinical trials on elderly women with prior CVD events, showed that supplementation with ]s (a type of polysaturated fat) does not appear to regularly produce desired outcomes." from "however supplementation with ]s (a type of polysaturated fat) does not appear have an effect" Yet the trial doesn't support the changes . The mean age in some one of the included trials in the meta analysis was 49 and there is no comment that the trials did not include men. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
User Jmh649 did not engage me he simply reverted back, case closed. When I pressed him for information on why reverting he stated 3 issues, I addressed those in good faith, and then I reverted back while editing those concerns. This issue he presents as an example I can also change. I must have been confused with another study I was reading. Something else he could have added to his concerns instead of 'revert warring' with me. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
I have added latest revert, which was without Talk page discussion or even an edit summary. It's a revert of my revert of Fgmoon353's, which I explained in full on the article Talk page. This revert of Fgmoon353's is an identical change to Fgmoon353's previous edit but makes one small adjustment for one of the issues raised, the rest are still unaddressed. This appear to be a continuation of edit-warring as it's simply reverting without discussing. <code>]]</code> 15:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}}.--] (]) 15:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


] | ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] reported by ] (Result: Semi-protected) ==
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
*:1.
*:2.
*:3.
*:4.
*:5.
*:6.
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] | ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{ping|ToBeFree}} The problem persists, ] and ] continue their edit war / vandalism on both pages. --] (]) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
*:Thank you very much for the notification, {{u|Jens Lallensack}}. Both blocked indefinitely, the latter unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. ] (]) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Declined) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Domestic terrorism in the United States}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|InedibleHulk}}


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Ambedkar Jayanti}} <br />
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Callmehelper}}


Previous version reverted to: '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
#
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# #
# #
# #
#


<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


<u>Comments:</u> <br />
User InedibleHulk is attempting to keep all mention of the Boston Marathon Bombings out of the article using the ruse of BLP violations against the accused suspects. He may have a point about the BLP issues, but if we look at the diffs we can see that his edits go beyond merely clearing those problems. His actual contention is that the bombings cannot be classified as terrorism. He will use BLP as an excuse to justify his reverts, but in fact he is actually edit warring against all mention of the event and refuses to collaborate with other editors. ] (]) 01:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
:Can't a guy have two valid objections to something without one being a ruse? We have a definition of terrorism in this article, which says it requires intent to disrupt, coerce or intimidate. All we have now is speculation on the suspects' motive, based on claims from anonymous sources. So calling it a terrorist attack is a guess. "Act of terror", sure, that's a phrase, not a legal definition. Also not what the article's about.


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
:Calling it ''domestic'' terrorism is where this begins to cross the BLP line. This implies an American did it, which has not been proven, let alone precisely which American(s). The guy's been vilified, shot, sedated, interrogated and charged, but has not been convicted, or even made his first court appearance. He should be presumed innocent here, like any accused person. Given that, I feel my deletions are exempt from 3RR.


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
:The edits in the third diff are for various separate reasons, explained in edit summaries and on the talk page. Not sure if those should be considered here, but if so, let me know. ] ] 01:46, ], ] (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}}. I've semi-protected the article for a week. There seems to be a lot of editing by different IPs and by newly registered accounts. Don't know if there's socking going on as I don't have time to look at it right now. There are BLP issues involved with unconfirmed and unsourced material, so I'm protecting the article against the editor(s) trying to add the material.--] (]) 01:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks. ] ] 02:09, ], ] (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on ]. ] (]) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==


:It's me @].
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Raquel_Evita_Saraswati}} <br />
:'''Clarification by my side ; '''
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|68.230.113.87}}
:Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.
:* ''Disputes details'' ;
:# Firstly , I edit ] check history of that page from to
:#''' process of reverting by others and my responses'''
:** then and we had a little discussion on my talk page for this disputes ] then i thought matter would be solved.
:*But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement and my response of revert and discussion on his talk page ]
:Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there
:Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk ] but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on ]
:So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.
:the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under ] or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page ] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.
:so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .
:'''Conclusion'''
:So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.
:Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.
:i left a discussion on ] page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources ].
:I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.
:
:I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.
:Much Regards. ] (]) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
::{{AN3|d}} Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. ] (]) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24h) ==
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
Difficult, since prior drive-by anti-vandalism editors have reverted similar deletions from the same page in the past.


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Angelo Rules}} <br />
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Johnny test person}}
The IP editors entire Contribution history is attempts to delete the exact same paragraph from this article.
]


'''Previous version reverted to:''' ]
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
The attempted vandalism is the deletion of an entire paragraph, which mentions the major reasons for her notability. The article admittedly needs a major edit, which is not my forte. The person who has been deleting it has made an (unsourced) claim that the source cited for her marriage is invalid, but instead of editing the paragraph to remove the disputed information, he has been deleting a paragraph of basic, uncontroversial biographical information.
While I have done /far/ more than 3 reverts to this page today by now, I believe the majority of them were legitimate anti-vandalism reverts (the uncommented deletion of an entire paragraph of content by an IP user). Unfortunately, the actual issue with the article only became clear though edit summaries. I repeatedly asked the person to move to the talk page, but unsuccessfully.


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
# ]
]
# ]
# ]
# ]


The majority of the text is my attempts to resolve this, but you can also see a comment by a previous editor (in 2008) objecting to the removal of the exact same information (former name, marriage, etc.)


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ]
Unfortunately, some of my comments there were responses to statements made in the edit summary, since the person in question refused to move to the talk page.


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' ] and ]
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' ]
As I said, I might have inadvertently violated 3RR myself here, though it was not my intention. It's a judgement call, as far as which of my reverts were legitimate anti-vandalism. In my defense, I repeatedly stated in edit summaries that my reversions were based on what appears to be vandalism that long predates my involvement.


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
] (]) 01:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - ] (]) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] (]) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Indefinitely blocked) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Bulgarians}} <br /> '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Grail Movement}}
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Stormfighter14}}


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Folawiki}}
I have noticed some racialist and anti-Turkish comments and POV-like edits, added by an newly-registred {{User|Stormfighter14}} as: "''Bulgarians are purely White European and not Turkic''", ''Bulgarians and their Aryan brothers'', ''Bulgarians are white europeans and that fact isn't even mentioned in this article which in fact is horrendous,'' "This article sounds very Mediterranean" etc. I have warned him, several times, but he has readded the same info, without any reliable scientific sources, again and again and deleted the terms ''Mediterranean'' and ''Middle Eastern'' from the article. He also accused me as a lier . Misplaced Pages is not place for propagandize racialist and pseudo-scientific theories. I do not know how to communicate with that person. Thank you. ] (]) 14:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


Previous version reverted to: '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
# {{diff2|1265465790|02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision ] by ] (])"
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|1265465049|02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
# {{diff2|1265464033|02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
# {{diff2|1265459461|01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
#


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
# {{diff2|1265461000|01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
# {{diff2|1265464521|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* December 2024 */ ] notice"
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|1265464576|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Disruptive editing on ]."
#
# {{diff2|1265465123|02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."
#
#


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
# {{diff2|1265464764|02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "{{re|Folawiki}} The whitewashing has to stop. ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
#
#
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
He just has removed the added by me tags for unreliable sources etc:
# ] (]) 15:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|72 hours}}. I have blocked Stormfighter14 for a combination of edit warring, personal attacks, and POV-pushing.--] (]) 15:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


Cult whitewashing. ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
*Indefinitely blocked.--] (]) 02:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|141.217.232.53}}


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Trisha Krishnan}}
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|TheHappiestEditor}}
Previous version reverted to: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bochasanwasi_Shri_Akshar_Purushottam_Swaminarayan_Sanstha&oldid=548024859


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
# {{diff2|1265432813|22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
# {{diff2|1265165246|13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


*Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
#
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and
#
#


#
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


# - putting fake sources/infomation
I have exceeded the "3 revert rule" because the individual appears to be using multiple IP addresses from Detroit area to vandalize the BAPS page and the Jay Sadguru Swami page earlier today (for which 2 of his/her IP addresses were blocked and the article placed under protection); also he/she is posting libelous material citing unverifiable sources (public blog). I have attempted many times to post on the article talk pages of BAPS and Jay Sadguru Swami, called the editor's attention to wikipedia policies, warned about disruptive edits, and posted on user's talk page, only to get bizarre uncooperative responses. The user also tried to delete my article talk page post and when I posted again to point this out, he deleted this post and referred to me as a "lunatic" and accused me of deleting posts. See: and I was redirected here after trying to report this as vandalism (earlier today on Jay Sadguru Swami for which another admin locked page and blocked IP addresses citing vandalism). Please help!
# - putting fake sources/infomation
# - putting fake sources/infomation


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
] (]) 04:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
#


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: Stale) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Richard A. Falk}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Drsmoo}}


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#


POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few . The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove and a recent one for from {{u|Krimuk2.0}}. - ] (]) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


:{{u|TheHappiestEditor}}, please respond to these allegations. ] (]) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==
<u>Comments:</u> This article is protected under ] as a 1RR page. Drsmoo is a long-time editor in this area and knows the rules. He was and . Yet his response was "LOL, excuse me? Neither of these were reverts. Who knew a single edit of a section on Misplaced Pages was edit warring. Stop trying to start fights." as if he had never heard of the policy. When I explained the policy again he gave a similar combative reply .


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Hariprasad Chaurasia}}
He removed material that has been discussed in depth previously on the talk page in ] and ] sections. Given his combative replies, I didn't feel much like starting a whole new section on it, besides the mention in another thread. '']''<big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 05:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)<br />


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|103.84.130.238}}
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
*{{AN3|s}} ] ] ] ] &spades; 05:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
::Thank you ] ] ]


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
::A short comment: I'm sick of being Harassed by CarolmooreDC. I think I would be forgiven for assuming that two non-revert edits in one day wouldn't be a violation, as CarolmooreDC has done the exact same thing, on the exact same article, multiple times — including yesterday.
# {{diff|oldid=1262480024|diff=1265542339|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|1265541681|12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
## {{diff2|1265542339|12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia "
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
::April 24:
::# #
::# #


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
::January 26


::#
::#


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
::Please correct me if edits like this are considered reverts, and I'll be sure not to make more than one on a contentious page per day. This report is part of an ongoing spate of harassment from CarolmooreDC who's hoping (P.S. please feel free to look through my editing history for anything "pernicious") or to annoy me until I stop posting. She has reported me roughly around twenty times with nothing coming of it, and it's ridiculous to be honest. I've yet to go to a noticeboard to report her for harassment, as (and perhaps this is why she constantly makes new reports) I find the process tiresome. However I will if nothing changes. ] (]) 07:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about ] and ] in edit summaries and warnings ] (]) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:::That is over three years old. Unless you have evidence of similar recent behavior, it is inadmissible. In any case, I think there's nothing more to do on this page; please start a ] thread if you feel it is necessary. -- ] ] ] ] &spades; 07:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
:The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a warning, but was to report it here. - ] (]) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}} ] (]) 22:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result:Indefinitely blocked) ==
::::How can something be stale after 28 hours? ''If you want immediate reports, you should NOT ask us if we left a 3rr/1rr/etc warning. - Or if we tried to discuss it on the talk page.'' Where's the best place to take this complaint about an inaccurate admin ruling?
::::* Dr. Smoo second revert: 23:49, April 23, 2013
::::* My 1rr Warning (where I asked for a revert): 00:47, April 24, 2013
::::* My complaint 03:19, April 25, 2013‎
::::Also, User:Drsmoo's "examples" of my 1rr violations again show his misunderstanding of policy; revert of vandalism by a named long term abuser doesn't count; fixing my own ref error doesn't count. '']''<big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 18:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Angelo Rules}}
:::::Additional comment: ''I see now'' that ] says: ''A warning is not required, but if the user appears unaware that edit warring is prohibited, they can be told about this policy by posting a <nowiki>{{uw-3rr}}</nowiki> template message on their user talk page.'' As I said on talk, "If a warning is NOT a requirement, then your introduction and template should say so." Obviously I will not be doing it again unless I really think it's a naive person, and I don't run into too many of those any more. '']''<big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 18:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Johnny test person}}
::::::OK, for the record, per talk page explanations, "stale" refers not to the 28 hour reporting time but the fact that User:Drsmoo didn't do any other edit warring in the article during that period so no " preventative measures" to stop him were necessary. Learn something every day. '']''<big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 03:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned) ==


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Jean-Philippe Guillemin}} <br />
# {{diff2|1265621270|21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|H1p3ri0n}}
# {{diff2|1265402736|19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265399005|19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265395466|18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265394604|18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


Previous version reverted to:


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: ,


Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (]) ] (]) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
<u>Comments:</u> <br />
* {{AN3|b| indef}} Two day old account with 19 edits, a block, and that personal attack? Bye. <b>]</b><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
User restored article that was originally merged into the ] article after an uncontested request. I have attempted to explain to the user that the original merge was not contested, but instead of initiating discussion, user continued to restore article. After restoring the article to prevent a full-on edit war, also attempted to explain to user that it was not worth noting that the subject of the article (who has a similar pseudonym as the user) played jazz guitar since the only reason he is notable is due to the Linux distribution he is associated with. --] ] 15:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
*{{AN3|w}}. I have restored the redirect, which has been in place for three years. I have warned the editor that they need to discuss restarting the article and that if they persist in edit warring, they risk being blocked.--] (]) 22:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: No violation) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Syria}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Alhanuty}}



<u>Comments:</u>He is edit warring in the Syria Article , see the history of page , i warned him , but he ignored the warning , showing that he's opinion is the correct , and that makes the article biased, the dispute about the article was ended ,and the result was keeping the flag and coat of arms , also the national anthem and the name of the country , but he every time vandalism the page. <br />

LOL,I never edit warred,secondly no consensus is reached ] (]) 21:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

And to keep you update 5 are with putting 2 flags and 5 are against it] (]) 21:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
*{{AN3|n}}. The article is under sanctions, meaning the relevant edit warring rule is ]. No one has violated that rule. What I do see is a great deal of disruptive editing and personal attacks by both of you. GhiathArodaki accuses Alhanuty of vandalism and writes incoherent diatribes on the article talk page. In an edit summary, Alhanuty accuses another editor (in all caps, of course) of being a meat puppet without a shred of evidence to back it up. And threats abound everywhere. At this point, I'm tempted to block both of you as neither of you has shown any sign that you know how to behave. Meanwhile, the article, and the ] article, are both suffering intermittent disruption (and are not necessarily consistent with each other). As to whether there's a consensus as to what belongs in these articles vis-a-vis the Assad government and the rebel government, I'm not going to wade into that quagmire.--] (]) 21:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The evidence is when I revert an edit by an editor,another editor supporting the editor that I reverted his edit comes and returns everything as it is before I edited ] (]) 22:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
:The fact that another editor disagrees with you is not evidence of meat puppetry.--] (]) 22:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Also one of these editor wanted to put israel as a rebel supporter,and his attempt failed so,I suspected meatpuppetry ] (]) 00:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
*{{AN3|nv}} Nothing more to see here. ] ] ] ] &spades; 00:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

== Multiple removals of clean-up tag in ] (semi-protected article) ==

== ] reported by ] (Result:
*{{AN3|b| hours}} ] ] ] ] &spades; 01:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Gun control}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Gaijin42}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#

<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

<u>Comments:</u> <br />
Gaijin42 is removing a tag for disputed content which remains in the article. Other editors are not repeatedly removing the content, only asking for validation as RS material. Gaijin42 makes hostile comments, including her most recent Edit Summary on Gun Control, "GFY" which I take to be an entirely inappropriate obscenity.
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
This is a difficult and contentious article. Other editors are trying in good faith to resolve disputed issues. This edit war is particularly unfortunate since the editor appears to be willfully hostile, per the above Edit Summary. ] ] 01:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} While he was not properly warned (the warning came after all the reverts), he's been here since 2006 so I presume he's heard of the 3RR. ] ] ] ] &spades; 01:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

== World Mission Society Church of God article ==

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|World_Mission_Society_Church_of_God}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Nancyinthehouse}}



<u>Comments:</u> The user has started some major edits on the page in question and is reverting any edits that she has not initiated. This is the page before she started working on it.<br />
]<br />

<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->

I am in an ongoing dispute with ] regarding this page, ]. Specifically, this editor brings into question any edits that were not initiated by them, especially if they have come from a source outside of the subject (WMSCOG) home page. The editor also does not seem to have a good understanding of what a NPOV means, believing that it means there should be NO negative info on a topic, as opposed to BALANCED info on a topic. The editor has also been spiteful in edits and has tried to find numerous frivolous reasons to delete links and info. We have gone through the 3O process and have used the talk page extensively: ].<br /><br />

A list of issues and links:<br />
<br />

1. Nancyinthehouse does not believe that a certain edit should be included in the history section. Her reasons are that the link used is from a blog, that the link itself is not from the WMSCOG, that the death of the founder has already been mentioned in his own article, etc. The point in contention is as follows: ]. During the 3O process, ] stated, "In regard to having information about the NCPCOG and WMSCOG... if one is part of the history of the other, and that history is covered in WP:RS that are WP:Notable then the information belongs in the article."<br />
<br />
2. Regarding NPOV, every religion page on this site that I have browsed through had either a section for criticism/controversy or a specific page. I felt it would be good to insert the same here. I made the mistake of using a blog in my first edit, realized this was a mistake and then tried using an article archived in Refworld, http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?docid=42df611d20 which was deemed appropriate during the 3O process. Nancyinthehouse is still disputing this article in the talk section. First she said the address did not exist. Then she said that the UN does not endorse this article and has not even addressed that other countries have also archived the report or that it was drafted by a government agency. ] and my second try: ]<br />
<br />
3. I am a bit of a grammar-a-holic, which is a carry over in my profession as a PR adviser. I did some small edits, which did not change any of the meaning and made the article much easier to read. I believe the errors were due to copy and paste from the WMSCOG web site and were likely there for some time. With no explanation, Nancyinthehouse reverted my edit. I have since tried to fix this again. ]<br />
<br />
I have been accused of having a hate-on for this church, which could not be further from the truth. I became interested in it after being approached at a local mall and, after searching online, found that the info on Misplaced Pages was lacking and sounded a bit like an advertisement. It seemed that part of the story was missing and this is what I'm trying to add. Unfortunately, Nancyinthehouse has been conducting edits as if she is the only one that can make any additions. I have tried the talk page but find that she has an excuse for excluding every edit I propose, most of which are frivolous. Once I file this I will notify Nancyinthehouse of my complaint. ] (]) 05:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:39, 28 December 2024

Noticeboard for edit warring

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.
    Click here to create a new report
    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357
    358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165
    1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480
    481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
    337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
    Other links

    User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)

    Page: Giganotosaurus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: PaleoFile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Callmehelper reported by User:Srijanx22 (Result: Declined)

    Page: Ambedkar Jayanti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Callmehelper (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 02:20, 26 December 2024
    2. 17:41, 24 December 2024
    3. 00:25, 22 December 2024
    4. 17:57, 21 December 2024



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on B. R. Ambedkar. Srijanx22 (talk) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    It's me @Callmehelper.
    Clarification by my side ;
    Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.
    • Disputes details ;
    1. Firstly , I edit Ambedkar Jayanti check history of that page from here to final version
    2. process of reverting by others and my responses
    • But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement see and my response of revert here and discussion on his talk page here
    Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there see
    Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk here but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on Talk:B. R. Ambedkar#Request_for_Administrator Review_of_Recent_Edits_on_Dr. B.R._Ambedkar's_Page
    So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.
    the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under WP:UNDUE or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page ] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.
    so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .
    Conclusion
    So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.
    Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.
    i left a discussion on Ambedkar Jayanti page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources look.
    I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.
    I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.
    Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
    Declined Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Johnny test person reported by User:Aoidh (Result: Blocked 24h)

    Page: Angelo Rules (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/1265377722

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:34, December 26, 2024
    2. 18:40, December 26, 2024
    3. 19:05, December 26, 2024
    4. 19:31, December 26, 2024


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1265395592

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User talk:Aoidh#Angelo Rules and Talk:Angelo Rules#Unsourced character biography section

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1265406607

    Comments:
    Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - Aoidh (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Folawiki reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Grail Movement (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Folawiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision 1265465515 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
    2. 02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265464633 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
    3. 02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265460975 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
    4. 01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1240888069 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Grail Movement."
    2. 02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "/* December 2024 */ WP:FTN notice"
    3. 02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Grail Movement."
    4. 02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Grail Movement."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "@Folawiki: The whitewashing has to stop. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"

    Comments:

    Cult whitewashing. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:TheHappiestEditor reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: )

    Page: Trisha Krishnan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: TheHappiestEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265170057 by Fylindfotberserk (talk) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
    2. 13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."
    • Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)
    1. - putting fake sources/infomation
    2. - putting fake sources/infomation
    3. - putting fake sources/infomation

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few . The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove and a recent one for edit-warring from Krimuk2.0. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    TheHappiestEditor, please respond to these allegations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:103.84.130.238 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Page protected)

    Page: Hariprasad Chaurasia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 103.84.130.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
      1. 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1262480024 by Fylindfotberserk (talk)"
      2. 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC) ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia "

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about WP:NCIN and MOS:HON in edit summaries and warnings Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a level 4 warning, but was asked to report it here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Johnny test person reported by User:ToBeFree (Result:Indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Angelo Rules (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265440086 by ToBeFree (talk)"
    2. 19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265401281 by Codename AD (talk)"
    3. 19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395978 by Codename AD (talk)"
    4. 18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395008 by Aoidh (talk)"
    5. 18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265382744 by Aoidh (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (Special:Diff/1265613452) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    Categories: