| Revision as of 01:33, 29 April 2013 view sourceCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,136 edits →Request for clarification regarding Jerusalem RFC: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:09, 1 January 2025 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Nableezy/Archive 58) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- {{Contentious topics/aware|a-i|blp|ap}} --> | |||
| <div style="text-align: center;">I was smoking the other night and I began to violently cough. I coughed so hard that I pulled a muscle in my back. So what did I do next? Smoked some more to try to ease the pain.</div> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| ⚫ | | algo = old(10d) | ||
| ⚫ | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| ⚫ | | archive = User talk:Nableezy/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| ⚫ | |maxarchivesize = 50K | ||
| |counter = |
| counter = 58 | ||
| ⚫ | | maxarchivesize = 50K | ||
| ⚫ | |minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| ⚫ | | archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| ⚫ | |algo = old( |
||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| ⚫ | |archive = User talk:Nableezy/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| ⚫ | | minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| }} | |||
| {{archive box collapsible | |||
| |auto=long | |||
| |<inputbox> | |||
| bgcolor=transparent | |||
| type=fulltext | |||
| prefix=User_talk:Nableezy | |||
| break=no | |||
| width=25 | |||
| searchbuttonlabel=Search | |||
| </inputbox> | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=yes}} | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == |
== Action requested on Alison Weir page == | ||
| Hi Nableezy. About your comments at the Jerusalem RfC discussion - I've noticed that some of your posts have been focused on the conduct of the other editors, rather than on the content issues at hand. Actually, perhaps it would be more accurate to say that the way you express some of your comments makes it hard to tell whether they are comments about the content or about user conduct. For example, on one level appears to be taking issue with what should be considered original research. This is, of course, a perfectly legitimate subject for a comment. On another level, though, saying things like "silly me", and "thats what again? Oh yeah, its not the same" might be interpreted as sarcasm, and therefore as a judgement of the actions of the editor in question. | |||
| As I wrote in ], I would like participants to keep comments focused on content, and I would prefer that there be no discussion of user conduct on the RfC discussion page. To this end, it would be a great help if you could make an extra effort to strip your comments of anything that might be considered sarcasm, or of anything that might otherwise appear to be commenting on user conduct. Would you be willing to do this? If you have any concerns about user conduct, even small ones, you are welcome to bring them up with me in private (preferably by email), and I will take a look. Best — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 05:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, Ive replaced the comment. Hope thats better, if not let me know. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 21:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Conduct == | |||
| I responded to the ] at ]. I think you might consider a ]. You seem to have an axe to grind and Misplaced Pages is not the place to do so. <font face="copperplate gothic light">] (])</font> 03:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, you learned that in your 329 edits with more than 50% in userspace? Thanks for the advice, really, no sarcasm at all. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 04:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == ... == | |||
| Nableezy, if you are a "Confirmed-extended" editor as I assume, would you be kind enough to take a look at my requested edit of a paragraph in the protected-extended entry "Alison Weir" and take action on it? It just sits there...thanks.... kenfree ] (]) 02:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Glad to see your are still around and doing what you do. Hope all is well. -] (]) 00:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== advice for article creation == | ||
| hi i’d love to speak to you about creating an article please. it’s on a controversial conflict so this is why i’d like to get it right. thanks ] (]) 17:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| A ] has been submitted regarding the ArbCom mandated Jerusalem RFC process. ''']''' (] • ] • ]) 01:33, 29 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:09, 1 January 2025
Action requested on Alison Weir page
Nableezy, if you are a "Confirmed-extended" editor as I assume, would you be kind enough to take a look at my requested edit of a paragraph in the protected-extended entry "Alison Weir" and take action on it? It just sits there...thanks.... kenfree Kenfree (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
advice for article creation
hi i’d love to speak to you about creating an article please. it’s on a controversial conflict so this is why i’d like to get it right. thanks Eatlandlords (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)