Revision as of 02:09, 27 May 2006 editJohn254 (talk | contribs)42,562 editsm Government actions: Clarified that exemption to California's pandering and prostitution laws judicially created in People vs. Freeman applies only to the production of nonobscene pornographic works← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:12, 18 November 2024 edit undoTgeorgescu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,865 editsm ref | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Overview of opposing views to pornography}} | |||
{{limitedgeographicscope}} | |||
], London]] | |||
The term ''' Anti-pornography movement''' is used to describe those who argue that ] has a variety of harmful effects. | |||
Reasons for '''opposition to pornography''' include ] and ], as well as alleged ], such as ] and ]. Pornography addiction is not a condition recognized by the ],<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 |title=Psychiatry Online |year=2013 |doi=10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 |last1=American Psychiatric Association |isbn=978-0-89042-555-8}}</ref>{{sfn|Rothman|2021|p=103}} the ],{{sfn|Rothman|2021|p=103}}<ref name="Martinez-Gilliard 2023 p. 113"/> or the DSM-5-TR.<ref name="Martinez-Gilliard 2023 p. 113">{{cite book | last=Martinez-Gilliard | first=Erin | title=Sex, Social Justice, and Intimacy in Mental Health Practice: Incorporating Sexual Health in Approaches to Wellness | publisher=Taylor & Francis | year=2023 | isbn=978-1-000-84578-5 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y1yqEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT113 | access-date=5 March 2023 | page=unpaginated | quote='Sex addiction' is also referred to as a diagnosis or presenting problem. Sex addiction is not a diagnosis in the DSM-5-TR and identified as Compulsive Sexual Behavior in the ICD-11 rather than an issue of addiction. | archive-date=4 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404230920/https://books.google.com/books?id=Y1yqEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT113 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Prause Binnie 2023 p=136346072311570">{{cite journal | last1=Prause | first1=Nicole | last2=Binnie | first2=James | title=Iatrogenic effects of Reboot/NoFap on public health: A preregistered survey study | journal=Sexualities | publisher=SAGE Publications | date=22 February 2023 | issn=1363-4607 | doi=10.1177/13634607231157070 | page=136346072311570| s2cid=257172274 | url=https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/download/af044dbeb36aefcdb593641a18267139b810bb745d21ca4e8881f5e40472d2e8/1373447/Submission_Sexualities_12.13.2022.pdf }}</ref> Anti-pornography movements have allied disparate social activists in opposition to pornography, from ] to ] advocates. The definition of "]" varies between countries and movements, and many make distinctions between pornography, which they oppose, and ], which they consider acceptable. Sometimes opposition will deem certain forms of pornography more or less harmful, while others draw no such distinctions. | |||
A 2018 ] survey reported that 43% of U.S. adults believe that pornography is "morally acceptable", a 7% increase from 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://news.gallup.com/poll/235280/americans-say-pornography-morally-acceptable.aspx |title=More Americans Say Pornography Is Morally Acceptable |date=2018-06-05 |website=Gallup.com |language=en |access-date=2020-03-12}}</ref> From 1975 to 2012, the gender gap in pornography opposition has widened, with women remaining more opposed to pornography than men, and men's opposition has declined faster.<ref name="Lykke-2015">{{Cite journal |last1=Lykke |first1=Lucia |last2=Cohen |first2=Philip |year=2015 |title=The Widening Gender Gap in Opposition to Pornography, 1975–2012 |doi=10.1177/2329496515604170 |journal=Social Currents |volume=2 |issue=4 |pages=307–323 |s2cid=44232681 |url=http://osf.io/4dymx/}}</ref> | |||
Though objections to pornography might come from many perspectives, they can often be classified as one of the categories noted below. | |||
== |
==Religious views== | ||
{{Main|Religious views on pornography}} | |||
Most world religions have positions in opposition to pornography from a variety of rationales,<ref>{{cite web |last=Slick |first=Matt |title=What does the Bible say about pornography? Is it wrong? |url=http://carm.org/pornography |access-date=6 May 2013 |date=2008-12-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Freeman |first=Tzvi |title=What's Wrong With Pornography? |url=http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/658901/jewish/Whats-Wrong-with-Pornography.htm |access-date=6 May 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Mujahid |first=Abdul Malik |title=Islam on Pornography: A Definite No-No |url=http://www.soundvision.com/info/life/porn/isporn.asp |access-date=6 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130509001316/http://www.soundvision.com/Info/life/porn/isporn.asp |archive-date=9 May 2013}}</ref> including concerns about ], ], ] and other virtues. There are numerous<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-pornography/ |title=Bible Verses about Pornography |website=biblestudytools.com}}</ref> verses in the Bible which are cited as condemning pornography or adultery, notably for ], ] in the ] which states "that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart." | |||
] in Uniontown, Indiana, USA]] | |||
Some ] ], such ] criticize pornography on ] grounds. They say sex is reserved for married couples, and assert that use of pornography could lead to an overall increase in behavior considered to be sexually immoral. | |||
The ] explicitly condemns pornography because it "offends against chastity" and "does grave injury to the dignity of its participants" since "each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others".<ref>{{Cite book |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church |year=1997 |pages=CCC 2354}}</ref> | |||
:''"Pornography consists in removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials."'' Section 2354 (http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P85.HTM) | |||
] also forbids adultery, and various verses of the Quran have been cited as condemning pornography, including ] which tells men to "restrain their eyes" from looking sexually at women.<ref>{{cite web |last=Rashid |first=Qasim |title=Muslim men need to understand that the Quran says they should observe hijab first, not women |website=] |date=29 March 2017 |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/muslim-men-hijab-forcing-women-islam-teaching-mohammed-quran-modesty-a7655191.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220524/https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/muslim-men-hijab-forcing-women-islam-teaching-mohammed-quran-modesty-a7655191.html |archive-date=2022-05-24 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==Feminist objections== | |||
Feminist positions on pornography are divided. Some feminists, such as ], ], ], ], and ], argue that pornography is degrading to women, and complicit in violence against women both in its production (where, they charge, abuse and exploitation of women performing in pornography is rampant) and in its consumption (where, they charge, pornography eroticizes the domination, humiliation, and coercion of women, and reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in ] and ]). Many feminists differentiate between different sorts of porn and may see some as fairly harmless. Those that favour a complete ban on pornography are actually a small minority, but they tend to receive more attention in the media. The majority of feminists would consider porn to be a small issue. | |||
==Feminist views== | |||
Beginning in the late ], anti-pornography radical feminists formed organizations such as ] that provided educational events, including slide-shows, speeches, and guided tours of the sex industry in ], in order to raise awareness of the content of pornography and the sexual subculture in pornography shops and live sex shows. | |||
{{Main|Feminist views on pornography#Anti-pornography feminism}} | |||
Some ] are opposed to pornography, arguing that it is an industry which ] and is complicit in ], both in its production (where they present evidence that abuse and exploitation of women performing in pornography is rampant) and in its consumption (where pornography eroticizes the ], ], and ] of women, and reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in ] and ]).<ref>Morgan, Robin (1974). "Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape". In: ''Going Too Far: The Personal Chronicle of a Feminist''. Random House. {{ISBN|0-394-48227-1}}.</ref> They charge that pornography contributes to the male-centered objectification of women and thus to sexism.<ref>MacKinnon, Catharine (1987). ''Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 146–150.</ref> ] was a feminist famously opposed to the pornography industry, and proposed the ] in several American cities in the 1980s. In 2015, feminist ] founded ], which responds to the growing pornography industry by providing education and support for healthy child and youth development.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.culturereframed.org/ |title=Culture Reframed |website=Culture Reframed}}</ref> | |||
The feminist anti-pornography movement was galvanized by the publication of ''Ordeal'', in which ] (who had allegedly been abused in the making of '']'' under the name "Linda Lovelace") stated that she had been beaten, raped, and pimped by her husband ], and that Traynor had forced her at gunpoint to make scenes in ''Deep Throat'', as well as forcing her, by use of both physical violence against Boreman as well as emotional abuse and outright threats of violence (some made against members of her family), to make other pornographic films. Dworkin, MacKinnon, and Women Against Pornography issued public statements of support, and worked with her in public appearances and speeches. Boreman's criticism focused feminist attention not only on the effects of the ''consumption'' of pornography (which had dominated feminist discussions of pornography in the ]), but also the effects of the ''production'' of pornography, in which abundant evidence has shown that abuse, harassment, economic exploitation, and physical and sexual violence are rampant. This evidence has received additional publicity because of the testimonies of other well known survivors of pornography such as ], and expressed in recent feminist works such as ]'s ''Power Surge: Sex, Violence and Pornography''. MacKinnon applies the critical test to determine whether the production of pornography is exploitative: would women ''choose'' to work in the pornography industry if it were not for the money?{{fact}} Critics note that this test fails to distinguish pornography from any other industry.{{fact}} | |||
However, many other feminists are opposed to censorship, and have argued against the introduction of anti-porn legislation in the United States, among them ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Carol |first1=Avedon |author-link1= |display-authors= |author-mask= |name-list-style= |date= |year= |orig-year= |display-editors= |title=The Harm of Porn: Just Another Excuse to Censor |script-title= |trans-title= |url=http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/harm.htm |department= |journal=The Law |type= |series= |language= |edition= |location=London |publication-date= |volume= |issue=June–July–August 1995 |page= |pages= |at= |no-pp= |arxiv= |asin= |bibcode= |bibcode-access= |biorxiv= |citeseerx= |doi= |doi-access= |issn=1360-807X |url-access= |access-date= |url-status= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150709041905/http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/harm.htm |archive-date=2015-07-09 |quote=}}</ref> Some ] actively support pornography that depicts female sexuality in a positive way, without objectifying or demeaning women, whereas some other feminists don't see any problem with the industry in its current state, given the subjective nature of perceiving humiliation or aggressiveness in a consensual context as something demeaning or negative.<ref>Nadine Strossen, {{cite web |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230497337.pdf |title=Feminist Critique of the Feminist Critique of Pornography, A Essay |website=core.ac.uk |access-date=12 October 2021}}</ref> | |||
Some anti-pornography feminists -- Dworkin and MacKinnon in particular -- advocated laws which would allow women who were sexually abused and otherwise hurt by pornography to sue pornographers in civil court. The ] that they drafted was passed twice by the ] city council in ], but vetoed by Mayor Donald Fraser, on the grounds that the city could not afford the litigation over the law's ]. The ordinance was successfully passed in ] by the ] city council and signed by Mayor ], and passed by a ] in ] in ], but struck down both times as unconstitutional by the state and federal courts. In ], the Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings in the ] case without comment. | |||
==Conservative views== | |||
Many anti-pornography feminists supported the legislative efforts, but others -- including ], ], and ] -- objected that legislative campaigns would be rendered ineffectual by the courts, would violate principles of free speech, or would harm the anti-pornography movement by taking organizing energy away from education and ] and entangling it in political squabbles (Brownmiller 318-321). | |||
Religious conservatives commonly oppose pornography, along with a subset of feminists, though their reasoning may differ.<ref name="Lykke-2015" /> Many religious conservatives view pornography as a threat to children. Some conservative Catholics and Protestants oppose pornography because they believe that it encourages non-procreative sex, encourages abortion, and can be connected to the rise of sexually transmitted diseases.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sherkat |first1=Darren |last2=Ellison |first2=Christopher |year=1997 |title=The Cognitive Structure of a Moral Crusade: Conservative Protestantism and Opposition to Pornography |jstor=2580526 |journal=Social Forces |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=957–980 |doi=10.1093/sf/75.3.957}}</ref><ref name="Nzwili2020">{{cite web |last1=Nzwili |first1=Fredrick |title=As underage pregnancies rise, Kenyan bishops warn against sex ed, abortion |url=https://www.catholicnews.com/as-underage-pregnancies-rise-kenyan-bishops-warn-against-sex-ed-abortion/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329072749/https://www.catholicnews.com/as-underage-pregnancies-rise-kenyan-bishops-warn-against-sex-ed-abortion/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 29, 2021 |publisher=] |access-date=26 November 2020 |language=en |date=23 June 2020}}</ref> | |||
] (CWA) is a conservative organization that opposes ] and ]. When discussing violence against women, the CWA often uses pornography to illustrate their points. The CWA asserts that pornography is a major reason why men inflict harm on women.<ref name="Schreiber-2008">{{Cite book |title=Righting Feminism |last=Schreiber |first=Ronnee |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008 |location=New York}}</ref> The CWA argues that pornography convinces men to disrespect their wives and neglect their marriages, thereby threatening the sanctity of traditional marriage. Unlike other issues CWA has tackled, they are less forcefully anti-feminist when it comes to the topic of pornography, as many of their points surrounding why pornography is distasteful parallels those of anti-pornography feminists.<ref name="Schreiber-2008" /> | |||
Other feminists, sometimes describing themselves as "]," criticize anti-pornography feminism. They take a wide range of views towards the mainstream of actually existing pornography: some view the growth of pornography as a crucial part of the ] that they allege has contributed to women's liberation; others view the existing pornography industry as misogynist and rife with exploitation, but hold that pornography could be and sometimes is feminist, and propose to reform or radically alter the pornography industry rather than opposing it wholesale. They typically oppose the ''theory'' of anti-pornography feminism -- which they accuse of selective handling of evidence, and sometimes of being prudish or as intolerant of sexual difference -- and also the political ''practice'' of anti-pornography feminism -- which they characterize as ] and accuse of complicity with conservative defenses of the oppressive sexual status quo. Notable advocates of the position include ] ], columnist and editor ], essayist and pornographer ] (formerly known as "Pat Califa"), and porn actress and writer ]. | |||
Some ] Christian and ] groups have issued death threats towards porn managers and ]s.<ref>{{cite web |last=Cole |first=Samantha |date=13 April 2021 |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7bj9w/anti-porn-extremism-pornhub-traffickinghub-exodus-cry-ncose |url-status=live |title=The Crusade Against Pornhub Is Going to Get Someone Killed |website=Vice |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413220002/https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7bj9w/anti-porn-extremism-pornhub-traffickinghub-exodus-cry-ncose |archive-date=13 April 2021 |access-date=23 February 2022}}</ref><ref name="Rosenbach Müller Höfner Baumgärtner 2021">{{cite news |last1=Rosenbach |first1=Marcel |last2=Müller |first2=Ann-Katrin |last3=Höfner |first3=Roman |last4=Baumgärtner |first4=Maik |last5=Spiegel |first5=Der |title=Hatred Against Women: The Dark World of Extremist Misogyny |work=Der Spiegel |date=10 March 2021 |url=https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/from-digital-hate-to-analog-violence-the-dark-world-of-extremist-misogyny-a-832ed3cb-21d1-4e84-8c28-089365e91a83 |access-date=25 March 2021}}</ref><ref name="DLey 2018">{{cite web |last=Ley |first=David J. |author-link=David J. Ley |title=Is One Sexual Behavior Triggering Certain Groups? |website=Psychology Today |date=27 October 2018 |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201810/is-one-sexual-behavior-triggering-certain-groups |access-date=12 January 2022}}</ref> | |||
The ]'s 1992 ruling in ] (the "Butler decision") fueled further controversy, when the court decided to incorporate some elements of Dworkin and MacKinnon's legal work on pornography into the existing Canadian obscenity law. In ''Butler'' the Court held that Canadian obscenity law violated Canadian citizens' rights to free speech under the ] if enforced on grounds of morality or community standards of decency; but that obscenity law ''could'' be enforced constitutionally against some pornography on the basis of the Charter's guarantees of sex equality. The Court's decision cited extensively from briefs prepared by the ] (LEAF), with the support and participation of ]. ] opposed LEAF's position, arguing that feminists should not support or attempt to reform criminal obscenity law. | |||
==Harm-based views== | |||
Controversy between anti-pornography feminists and their critics grew when the Canadian government raided and prosecuted ], a ] bookstore in ], in its first obscenity prosecution under the ''Butler'' criteria. The bookstore was prosecuted for selling copies of the ] ] magazine, ]. In 1993, copies of Andrea Dworkin's book ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women'' were held for inspection by Canadian customs agents , fostering an urban legend that Dworkin's own books had also been banned from Canada under a law that she herself had promoted. However, the Butler decision did not adopt the whole of Dworkin and MacKinnon's ordinance; Dworkin did not support the decision; and the impoundment of her books (which were released shortly after they were inspected) was a standard procedural measure, unrelated to the ''Butler'' decision . | |||
{{see also|Effects of pornography}} | |||
{{Imageframe|width=300|content=] ] ]|caption=Figures 7, 8, and 9 in Zillmann, Dolf: "Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography", 1986.<ref name="Zillman">{{cite web |url=http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/NN/B/C/K/V/ |title=Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health: Background Papers: 'Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography' |last=Zillmann |first=Dolf |date=4 August 1986 |website=profiles.nlm.nih.gov |access-date=8 April 2018}}</ref>|align=right}} | |||
] argued in the 1986 publication "Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography" that extensive viewing of pornographic material produces many unfavorable ] effects, including a decreased respect for long-term ] relationships, and an attenuated desire for ].<ref name="Zillman"/> He describes the theoretical basis of these experimental findings:<blockquote>The values expressed in pornography clash so obviously with the family concept, and they potentially undermine the traditional values that favor marriage, family, and children... Pornographic scripts dwell on sexual engagements of parties who have just met, who are in no way attached or committed to each other, and who will part shortly, never to meet again... Sexual gratification in pornography is not a function of emotional attachment, of kindness, of caring, and especially not of continuance of the relationship, as such continuance would translate into responsibilities, curtailments, and costs...{{sfn|Zillmann|1986|pp=16-17}}</blockquote> | |||
== Government actions== | |||
In the ], a 1968 ] decision which held that people could view whatever they wished in the privacy of their own homes caused Congress to fund and President ] to appoint a commission to study pornography. The commission's report, called "]", recommended ], funding of research into the effects of pornography, restriction of children's access to pornography, and recommended against any restrictions for adults. The report was widely criticized and rejected by Congress. | |||
A study by Zillman in 1982 also indicated that prolonged exposure to pornography desensitized both men and women toward victims of ]. After being shown pornographic movies, test subjects were asked to judge an appropriate punishment for a rapist. The test subjects recommended incarceration terms that were significantly more lenient than those recommended by control subjects who had not watched pornography.<ref name="Zillman"/> | |||
In 1983, prosecutors in ] tried to use ] and ] state statutes against a producer of and actors in a pornographic movie; the ] ruled in 1988 that these statutes do not apply to the production of nonobscene pornography (). Some speculate that this decision implictly condones pornography and was one of the reasons most modern American porn is produced in California. | |||
Some researchers like Zillman believe that pornography causes unequivocal harm to society by increasing rates of ].<ref name="Zillman"/><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Simmons |first1=Catherine A. |last2=Lehmann |first2=Peter |last3=Collier-Tenison |first3=Shannon |title=Linking male use of the sex industry to controlling behaviors in violent relationships: an exploratory analysis |journal=] |volume=14 |issue=4 |pages=406–417 |doi=10.1177/1077801208315066 |pmid=18359877 |date=April 2008 |s2cid=19294687}}</ref> Other researchers believe that there is a correlation between pornography and a decrease of ]s; exhibiting a strong disbelief in the claim that pornography is a cause of rape; mainstream science does not claim that pornography would be a cause of rape.<ref name="Diamond, M">{{Bulleted list|{{Cite web |last=Diamond |first=Milton |author-link=Milton Diamond |title=The Effects of Pornography: An International Perspective |url=http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/DIAM/effects_pornography.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080115001619/http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/online_artcls/pornography/prngrphy_ovrvw.html |archive-date=15 January 2008 |publisher=Porn 101: Eroticism, Pornography, and the First Amendment, ]}}|{{Cite web |last=Kendall |first=Todd |title=Pornography, rape and the internet |url=http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynamic/events_media/Kendall%20cover%20+%20paper.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061102192540/http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynamic/events_media/Kendall%20cover%20%2B%20paper.pdf |archive-date=2 November 2006 |access-date=25 October 2006}}|{{Cite journal |last=D'Amato |first=Anthony |date=June 23, 2006 |title=Porn Up, Rape Down |url=https://ssrn.com/abstract=913013 |journal=Northwestern Public Law Research Paper |doi=10.2139/ssrn.913013 |ssrn=913013 |id=id: 913013}}|{{cite book | last=Howitt | first=Dennis | title=Introduction to Forensic and Criminal Psychology | date=2022 | isbn=978-1-292-29580-0 | publisher=Pearson Education Limited | quote=• Offenders use pornography, but developmental studies tend not to hold pornography responsible for creating their deviance. There is no simple relationship between sexual fantasy and offending. | chapter=9. Sexual offenders 1: rapists | page=166 | edition=7}}|{{cite web | last=Moyer | first=Melinda Wenner | title=The Sunny Side of Smut | website=Scientific American | date=1 July 2011 | url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sunny-side-of-smut/ | access-date=29 May 2024}}|{{cite book | last1=McKee | first1=Alan | last2=Litsou | first2=Katerina | last3=Byron | first3=Paul | last4=Ingham | first4=Roger | title=What Do We Know About the Effects of Pornography After Fifty Years of Academic Research? | publisher=Routledge | publication-place=London | date=10 June 2022 | isbn=978-1-003-23203-2 | doi=10.4324/9781003232032 | page=96}}}}</ref> | |||
:''"Evidence of the harm of exposure to sexually explicit images or words in childhood is inconclusive, even nonexistent. The ] U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, the 'Lockhart' commission, uncovered no link between adult exposure to pornography and bad behavior and called for the dismantling of legal restrictions on ]."'' - ], '']'' | |||
The appropriation of the sexually explicit in American culture is part of what has been called "the ] of America".<ref>{{cite web |last=Whitehead |first=John W. |title=Miley Cyrus and the Pornification of America |url=https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/miley_cyrus_and_the_pornification_of_america |website=rutherford.org |publisher=The Rutherford Institute |access-date=7 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Aucoin |first=Don |title=The pornification of America. From music to fashion to celebrity culture, mainstream entertainment reflects an X-rated attitude like never before |url=http://www.boston.com/yourlife/articles/2006/01/24/the_pornification_of_america/?page=full |work=Boston Globe |date=January 24, 2006 |access-date=7 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
In ], President ] appointed another commission to study pornography issues, specifically to overturn the findings of the Lockhart commission. It was headed by Attorney General ] and is generally known as the ]. The commission's report, released in 1986, found that "violent pornography" is harmful and can lead to "violent acts". This report has been criticised for allegedly producing findings that were politically expedient rather than reflecting the empirical evidence; among those criticising it were some of the scientists who gathered that evidence and reported a conclusion to the Meese commission much different from the conclusion the commission later announced. | |||
In a 2021 review of recent pornography research, K. Camille Hoagland & Joshua B. Grubbs posit that "Specifically, mere pornography use itself was most often not associated with sexual functioning in either direction, but self-reported problematic use of pornography was consistently associated with more sexual functioning problems."<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hoagland |first1=K. Camille |last2=Grubbs |first2=Joshua B. |date=2021-09-01 |title=Pornography Use and Holistic Sexual Functioning: a Systematic Review of Recent Research |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00378-4 |journal=Current Addiction Reports |language=en |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=408–421 |doi=10.1007/s40429-021-00378-4 |issn=2196-2952}}</ref> | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
The impact of pornography can vary significantly among teenagers and across cultures, depending on specific constellations of personality traits. Research indicates that special attention may be required for highly frequent consumers of pornography, those who actively seek sexually violent content, and individuals with additional risk factors.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Malamuth |first1=N. |last2=Huppin |first2=M. |date=June 2005 |title=Pornography and Teenagers: The Importance of Individual Differences |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.004 |journal=Adolescent Medicine Clinics |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=315–326 |doi=10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.004 |issn=1547-3368}}</ref> | |||
==Anti-pornography Websites== | |||
* | |||
Male adolescents at a more advanced pubertal stage, characterized as sensation seekers with weak or troubled family relations, tended to use pornography more frequently. This usage correlated with more permissive sexual attitudes and stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. Additionally, it appeared to be associated with engaging in sexual intercourse, having greater experience with casual sex behavior, and an increased likelihood of involvement in sexual aggression, both as perpetrators and victims.<ref name="valken">{{Cite journal |last1=Peter |first1=Jochen |last2=Valkenburg |first2=Patti M. |date=2016-05-03 |title=Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research |journal=The Journal of Sex Research |language=en |volume=53 |issue=4–5 |pages=509–531 |doi=10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441 |issn=0022-4499|doi-access=free }}</ref> The authors of the review state that the impact of pornography upon the brains of teenagers is a suggestion (what scientific literature suggests) rather than a scientific fact.<ref name="valken"/> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
] is often discussed when it comes to pornography, and is defined by society ] women because of their rape. It is known as society making rape less substantial. Some of the most searched titles on pornography websites is rape scenes.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Makin |first1=David A. |last2=Morczek |first2=Amber L. |title=The dark side of internet searches: a macro level assessment of rape culture |journal=International Journal of Cyber Criminology |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=1–23 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.22057 |date=June 2015 |url=http://www.cybercrimejournal.com/Makin&Morczek2015vol9issue1.pdf}}</ref> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
In 2016, model and actress ] and Orthodox Rabbi ] co-authored a viral '']'' opinion piece, in which they called ] a "public hazard of unprecedented seriousness."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/take-the-pledge-no-more-indulging-porn-1472684658 |title=Take the Pledge: No More Indulging Porn |first1=Shmuley |last1=Boteach |first2=Pamela |last2=Anderson |date=August 31, 2016 |work=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://observer.com/2016/09/talking-porn-with-pamela-anderson-and-rabbi-shmuley/ |work=The Observer |first=Ken |last=Kurson |title=Talking Porn With Pamela Anderson and Rabbi Shmuley |date=September 20, 2016}}</ref><ref name="Daniel Sugarman">Daniel Sugarman. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329072733/https://www.thejc.com/news/world/shmuley-boteach-and-pamela-anderson-in-joint-warning-on-dangers-of-pornography-1.63911 |date=2021-03-29 }} ''The Jewish Chronicle''.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=October 14, 2016 |title=The playmate and the rabbi: unlikely bedfellows fighting internet porn |url=http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/oct/14/pamela-anderson-and-the-rabbi-unlikely-bedfellows-fighting-internet-porn |access-date=January 20, 2021 |website=The Guardian |first=Emine |last=Saner |language=en}}</ref> The two called for a "sensual revolution" to replace "pornography with eroticism, the alloying of sex with love, of physicality with personality, of the body's mechanics with imagination, of orgasmic release with binding relationships."<ref name="Daniel Sugarman"/> They later gave a joint lecture at ] to over 1,000 people.<ref name="Lewak-2018">{{Cite web |url=https://nypost.com/2018/04/18/sex-tips-from-pamela-anderson-and-an-orthodox-rabbi/ |title=Sex tips from Pamela Anderson and an Orthodox rabbi |first=Doree |last=Lewak |work=The New York Post |date=April 18, 2018}}</ref> The two also wrote a book together, ''Lust for Love'' (2018), about how meaningful, passionate sex has been declining, and calling for a new sensual revolution that emphasizes partners connecting in the bedroom.<ref name="Lewak-2018"/><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.jpost.com/opinion/porn-is-ravishing-a-generation-of-good-men-564759 |title=Porn is ravishing a generation of good men |website=The Jerusalem Post |date=August 13, 2018 |first=Shmuley |last=Boteach}}</ref> | |||
Some studies suggest that children and youths are more susceptible to the neurological effects of pornography consumption than adults, however this lacks direct empirical evidence.<ref name="Brown Wisco 2019 pp. 10–13">{{cite journal |last1=Brown |first1=Jennifer A. |last2=Wisco |first2=Jonathan J. |title=The components of the adolescent brain and its unique sensitivity to sexually explicit material |journal=Journal of Adolescence |publisher=Elsevier BV |volume=72 |year=2019 |issn=0140-1971 |pmid=30754014 |doi=10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.01.006 |pages=10–13 |s2cid=73442225}}</ref> This can be attributed to considerable ethical problems with performing such research.<ref name="Binik Mah Kiesler 1999 pp. 82–90">{{cite journal |last1=Binik |first1=Yitzchak M. |last2=Mah |first2=Kenneth |last3=Kiesler |first3=Sara |title=Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the internet |journal=Journal of Sex Research |publisher=Informa UK Limited |volume=36 |issue=1 |year=1999 |issn=0022-4499 |doi=10.1080/00224499909551971 |pages=82–90}}</ref> Since those problems are a huge obstacle, it is likely that such research will not be allowed, thus possibly it could never be known.<ref name="Dallas News 2014">{{cite web |first=David |last=Segal |author-link=David Segal (reporter) |title=Does porn harm children? |website=Dallas News |date=4 April 2014 |url=https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2014/04/04/does-porn-harm-children/ |access-date=14 April 2021}}</ref><ref name="The New York Times 2014">{{cite web |first=David |last=Segal |title=Opinion - Does Porn Hurt Children? |website=The New York Times |date=28 March 2014 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/29/sunday-review/does-porn-hurt-children.html |access-date=18 April 2021}}</ref> Rory Reid (]) declared "Universities don't want their name on the front page of a newspaper for an unethical study exposing minors to porn."<ref name="Dallas News 2014"/><ref name="The New York Times 2014"/> | |||
While the World Health Organization's ] (2022) has recognized ] (CSBD) as an "impulsive control disorder",<ref>{{Cite web |title=Compulsive sexual behavior disorder |url=https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%253A%252F%252Fid.who.int%252Ficd%252Fentity%252F1630268048 |access-date=2022-03-25 |website=World Health Organization (ICD-11)}}</ref> CSBD is not an addiction,<ref name="Psychology Today 2018">{{cite web |first=David J. |last=Ley |title=Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder in ICD-11 |website=Psychology Today |date=24 January 2018 |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/women-who-stray/201801/compulsive-sexual-behavior-disorder-in-icd-11 |access-date=27 March 2021}}</ref><ref name="Sassover Weinstein p. ">{{cite journal |last1=Sassover |first1=Eli |last2=Weinstein |first2=Aviv |title=Should compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) be considered as a behavioral addiction? A debate paper presenting the opposing view |journal=Journal of Behavioral Addictions |publisher=Akademiai Kiado Zrt. |date=29 September 2020 |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=166–179 |issn=2062-5871 |doi=10.1556/2006.2020.00055 |pmid=32997646 |pmc=9295215 |s2cid=222167039}}</ref><ref name="Therapist 2021">{{cite web |author=a verified Counsellor or Therapist |title=Do I have compulsive sexual behaviour? |website=Counselling Directory |date=18 January 2021 |url=https://www.counselling-directory.org.uk/memberarticles/do-i-have-compulsive-sexual-behaviour |access-date=26 March 2022 |quote="Materials related to the ICD-11 make very clear that CSBD is not intended to be interchangeable with 'sex addiction', but rather is a substantially different diagnostic framework." ICD-11. World Health Organisation.}}</ref><ref name="Neves 2021 p. 14">{{cite book |last=Neves |first=Silva |title=Compulsive Sexual Behaviours: A Psycho-Sexual Treatment Guide for Clinicians |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2021 |isbn=978-1-000-38710-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=31olEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT14 |access-date=26 March 2022 |page=14 |quote=... materials in ICD-11 make very clear that CSBD is not intended to be interchangeable with sex addiction, but rather is a substantially different diagnostic framework}}</ref> and the American Psychiatric Association's ] (2013) and the DSM-5-TR (2022) do not classify compulsive ] consumption as a ] or a behavioral ].<ref name=weir>{{cite journal |last1=Weir |first1=Kirsten |title=Is pornography addictive? |url=http://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/04/pornography.aspx |url-status=dead |journal=Monitor on Psychology |date=April 2014 |volume=45 |issue=4 |page=46 |issn=1529-4978 |oclc=612512821 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140405232028/http://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/04/pornography.aspx |archive-date=2014-04-05}}</ref><ref name="allez">{{cite book |editor-first=Glyn Hudson |editor-last=Allez |title=Sexual Diversity and Sexual Offending: Research, Assessment, and Clinical Treatment in Psychosexual Therapy|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MXnAAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA161 |date=4 June 2014 |publisher=Karnac Books |isbn=978-1-78181-368-3 |page=161 |chapter=Chapter Ten. The pleasure, the power, and the perils of Internet pornography |access-date=27 April 2019}}</ref><ref name=othertwo>Since it is neither of two behavioral addictions mentioned in the DSM-5 or DSM-5-TR.</ref><ref name="American Psychiatric Association 2022 ch. 29">{{cite book |author=American Psychiatric Association |title=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR(tm)) |publisher=American Psychiatric Association Publishing |series=G - Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-89042-576-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PIGizgEACAAJ |chapter=Conditions for Further Study |page=916 |quote=Excessive use of the Internet not involving playing of online games (e.g., excessive use of social media, such as Facebook; viewing pornography online) is not considered analogous to Internet gaming disorder, and future research on other excessive uses of the Internet would need to follow similar guidelines as suggested herein. Excessive gambling online may qualify for a separate diagnosis of gambling disorder.}}</ref><ref name="American Psychiatric Association 2022 ch. 19">{{cite book |author=American Psychiatric Association |title=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR(tm)) |publisher=American Psychiatric Association Publishing |series=G - Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-89042-576-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PIGizgEACAAJ |chapter=Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders |page=543 |quote=In addition to the substance-related disorders, this chapter also includes gambling disorder, reflecting evidence that gambling behaviors activate reward systems similar to those activated by drugs of abuse and that produce some behavioral symptoms that appear comparable to those produced by the substance use disorders. Other excessive behavioral patterns, such as Internet gaming (see “Conditions for Further Study”), have also been described, but the research on these and other behavioral syndromes is less clear. Thus, groups of repetitive behaviors, sometimes termed <em>behavioral addictions</em> (with subcategories such as “sex addiction,” “exercise addiction,” and “shopping addiction”), are not included because there is insufficient peer-reviewed evidence to establish the diagnostic criteria and course descriptions needed to identify these behaviors as mental disorders.}}</ref> According to Emily F. Rothman, "The professional public health community is not behind the recent push to declare pornography a public health crisis."<ref name="Rothman 2021 p. 2">{{cite book |last=Rothman |first=Emily F. |title=Pornography and Public Health |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2021 |isbn=978-0-19-007549-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M30_EAAAQBAJ&pg=PT2 |access-date=31 May 2022 |page=2 |quote=The professional public health community is not behind the recent push to declare pornography a public health crisis.}}</ref> The ideas supporting the "crisis" have been described as pseudoscientific.<ref name="de Jong Faulkenberry Konda Joyner 2022 p. ">{{cite book | last1=de Jong | first1=David C. | last2=Faulkenberry | first2=Rachel S. | last3=Konda | first3=Olivia | last4=Joyner | first4=Berkley | title=Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology | chapter=Masturbation | publisher=Elsevier | year=2022 | pages=369–378 | doi=10.1016/b978-0-323-91497-0.00075-8 | isbn=9780323914987 }}</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Freedom of speech|Human sexuality|Erotica and pornography}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*{{section link|Criticism of Misplaced Pages|Sexual content}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
* ] (1999). (ISBN 0385314868). | |||
==Further reading== | |||
===Anti-pornography advocacy=== | |||
*] (1999). ''In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution''. The Dial Press. {{ISBN|0-385-31486-8}}. | |||
*] (1994). ''Pornography effects: Empirical and clinical evidence''. {{ISBN|1136690204}} | |||
*], long-time political, anti-pornography activist and prolific writer on feminist subjects | |||
*] (1979). ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women''. {{ISBN|0-452-26793-5}}. | |||
*]. ''Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature''. New York: Harper, 1981. | |||
*], founder of ], a non-profit ] organization that educates on the dangers of pornography use and involvement | |||
*] (2007). ''Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity''. Cambridge, MA: ]. {{ISBN|978-0-89608-776-7}}. | |||
*] / Robert Jensen / Ann Russo (1998). ''Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality''. Routledge. {{ISBN|0-415-91813-8}}. | |||
*] (1986). ''The Pornography of Representation''. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK {{ISBN|0-7456-0122-7}}. | |||
*] (1991). ''Men Confront Pornography''. New York: Meridian — Random House. {{ISBN|0-452-01077-2}}. (a variety of essays that try to assess ways that pornography may take influence or harm men) | |||
*], former porn performer and self-described "porn missionary"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.shelleylubben.com/index.php?truth=bio |title=Shelley Lubben - My Blog, Thoughts, and Life |website=www.shelleylubben.com |access-date=8 April 2018}}</ref> who counsels active porn performers on how to escape the industry<ref name="cbn">{{cite news |title=Out of Pornography and Into the Light |url=http://www.cbn.com/700club/guests/bios/shelley_lubben050506.aspx |publisher=CBN |access-date=2010-04-18}}</ref> (2010). ''Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn: The Greatest Illusion on Earth''. CreateSpace. {{ISBN|978-1-4538-6007-6}}. | |||
*] (1985). ''Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech.'' 20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1 (arguing that pornography is one of the mechanisms of power used to maintain gender inequality) | |||
*], former pornographic producer who currently speaks about the unseen side of porn that is damaging to the women involved; frequently worked with Craig Gross of XXXChurch, until pleading to a six-year underage sex sentencing | |||
*Christine Stark and ] (2004). {{cite book |title=Not for sale: feminists resisting prostitution and pornography |publisher=Spinifex Press |location=North Melbourne, Victoria |isbn=9781876756499 |year=2004}} | |||
===Criticism of anti-pornography=== | |||
*]. "Susie Sexpert's Lesbian Sex World and Susie Bright's Sexual Reality: A Virtual Sex World Reader", San Francisco, CA: Cleis Press, 1990 and 1992. Challenges any easy equation between feminism and anti-pornography positions. | |||
*]. "Feminism and Free speech: Pornography." Feminists for Free Expression 1993. 8 May 2002. | |||
*Kate Ellis. Caught Looking: Feminism, Pornography, and Censorship. New York: Caught Looking Incorporated, 1986. | |||
*Matthew Gever. "Pornography Helps Women, Society", UCLA Bruin, 1998-12-03. | |||
*Michele Gregory. "Pro-Sex Feminism: Redefining Pornography (or, a study in alliteration: the pro pornography position paper) "<ref>{{cite web |url=http://witsendzine.com/musings/michele/ppp.htm |title=Pro-Sex Feminism: Redefining Pornography |access-date=2011-07-03 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020809091134/http://witsendzine.com/musings/michele/ppp.htm |archive-date=2002-08-09}}</ref> | |||
*], "Dangerous, Misguided, and Wrong: An Analysis of Anti-Pornograph Politics." In "Bad Girl and Dirty Pictures," ed. Carol Assuster (1993). | |||
*Andrea Juno and V. Vale. Angry Women, Re/Search # 12. San Francisco, CA: Re/Search Publications, 1991. Performance artists and literary theorists who challenge Dworkin and MacKinnon's claim to speak on behalf of all women. | |||
**"A Feminist Overview of Pornography, Ending in a Defense Thereof"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wendymcelroy.com/freeinqu.htm |title=A Feminist Overview of Pornography |first=Wendy |last=McElroy |website=www.wendymcelroy.com |access-date=8 April 2018}}</ref> | |||
**"A Feminist Defense of pornography"<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://secularhumanism.org/s/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19981201205458/http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/mcelroy_17_4.html |url-status=dead |title=Search | Free Inquiry |first=Marc |last=Kreidler |date=July 26, 2019 |archive-date=1 December 1998}}</ref> | |||
*Ley, David, Prause, Nicole, & Finn, Peter. (2014). The Emperor Has No Clothes: A review of the "Pornography Addiction" model. Current Sexual Health Reports, manuscript in press.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1007/s11930-014-0016-8 |volume=6 |issue=2 |title=The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the 'Pornography Addiction' Model |journal=Current Sexual Health Reports |pages=94–105 |year=2014 |last1=Ley |first1=David |last2=Prause |first2=Nicole |last3=Finn |first3=Peter |s2cid=55374203}}</ref> | |||
*Annalee Newitz. "Obscene Feminists: Why Women Are Leading the Battle Against Censorship." San Francisco Bay Guardian Online 8 May 2002. 9 May 2002<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sfbg.com/36/32/news_womenvscensorship.html |title=sfbg.com |website=sfbg.com |access-date=8 April 2018}}</ref> | |||
*]: | |||
**"Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women's Rights" ({{ISBN|0-8147-8149-7}}) | |||
**"Nadine Strossen: Pornography Must Be Tolerated"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.spectacle.org/1195/strossen.html |first=Nadine |last=Strossen |title=Pornography Must Be Tolerated |publisher=The Ethical Spectacle |date=November 1995}}</ref> | |||
*Scott Tucker. "Gender, Fucking, and Utopia: An Essay in Response to John Stoltenberg's Refusing to Be a Man."<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=am37yVCaQXAC&q=Gender,+Fucking,+and+Utopia:+An+Essay+in+Response+to+John+Stoltenberg's+Refusing+to+Be+a+Man&pg=PR14 |title=The Columbia Reader on Lesbians and Gay Men in Media, Society, and Politics |first1=Larry P. |last1=Gross |first2=James D. |last2=Woods |date=8 April 1999 |publisher=Columbia University Press |access-date=8 April 2018 |via=Google Books |isbn=9780231104463}}</ref> in Social Text 27 (1991): 3-34. Critique of Stoltenberg and Dworkin's positions on pornography and power. | |||
*Carole Vance, Editor. "Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality". Boston: Routledge, 1984. Collection of papers from 1982 conference; visible and divisive split between anti-pornography activists and lesbian S&M theorists. | |||
===Notes=== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
{{Pornography}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Anti-Pornography Movement}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 15:12, 18 November 2024
Overview of opposing views to pornographyReasons for opposition to pornography include religious objections and feminist concerns, as well as alleged harmful effects, such as pornography addiction and erectile dysfunction. Pornography addiction is not a condition recognized by the DSM-5, the ICD-11, or the DSM-5-TR. Anti-pornography movements have allied disparate social activists in opposition to pornography, from social conservatives to harm reduction advocates. The definition of "pornography" varies between countries and movements, and many make distinctions between pornography, which they oppose, and erotica, which they consider acceptable. Sometimes opposition will deem certain forms of pornography more or less harmful, while others draw no such distinctions.
A 2018 Gallup survey reported that 43% of U.S. adults believe that pornography is "morally acceptable", a 7% increase from 2017. From 1975 to 2012, the gender gap in pornography opposition has widened, with women remaining more opposed to pornography than men, and men's opposition has declined faster.
Religious views
Main article: Religious views on pornographyMost world religions have positions in opposition to pornography from a variety of rationales, including concerns about modesty, human dignity, chastity and other virtues. There are numerous verses in the Bible which are cited as condemning pornography or adultery, notably for Christians, Matthew 5:28 in the Sermon on the Mount which states "that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church explicitly condemns pornography because it "offends against chastity" and "does grave injury to the dignity of its participants" since "each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others".
Islam also forbids adultery, and various verses of the Quran have been cited as condemning pornography, including Quran 24:31 which tells men to "restrain their eyes" from looking sexually at women.
Feminist views
Main article: Feminist views on pornography § Anti-pornography feminismSome feminists are opposed to pornography, arguing that it is an industry which exploits women and is complicit in violence against women, both in its production (where they present evidence that abuse and exploitation of women performing in pornography is rampant) and in its consumption (where pornography eroticizes the domination, humiliation, and coercion of women, and reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in rape and sexual harassment). They charge that pornography contributes to the male-centered objectification of women and thus to sexism. Andrea Dworkin was a feminist famously opposed to the pornography industry, and proposed the Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance in several American cities in the 1980s. In 2015, feminist Gail Dines founded Culture Reframed, which responds to the growing pornography industry by providing education and support for healthy child and youth development.
However, many other feminists are opposed to censorship, and have argued against the introduction of anti-porn legislation in the United States, among them Betty Friedan, Kate Millett, Karen DeCrow, Wendy Kaminer and Jamaica Kincaid. Some sex-positive feminists actively support pornography that depicts female sexuality in a positive way, without objectifying or demeaning women, whereas some other feminists don't see any problem with the industry in its current state, given the subjective nature of perceiving humiliation or aggressiveness in a consensual context as something demeaning or negative.
Conservative views
Religious conservatives commonly oppose pornography, along with a subset of feminists, though their reasoning may differ. Many religious conservatives view pornography as a threat to children. Some conservative Catholics and Protestants oppose pornography because they believe that it encourages non-procreative sex, encourages abortion, and can be connected to the rise of sexually transmitted diseases.
Concerned Women For America (CWA) is a conservative organization that opposes same-sex marriage and abortion. When discussing violence against women, the CWA often uses pornography to illustrate their points. The CWA asserts that pornography is a major reason why men inflict harm on women. The CWA argues that pornography convinces men to disrespect their wives and neglect their marriages, thereby threatening the sanctity of traditional marriage. Unlike other issues CWA has tackled, they are less forcefully anti-feminist when it comes to the topic of pornography, as many of their points surrounding why pornography is distasteful parallels those of anti-pornography feminists.
Some extremist Christian and far-right groups have issued death threats towards porn managers and sex workers.
Harm-based views
See also: Effects of pornography Figures 7, 8, and 9 in Zillmann, Dolf: "Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography", 1986.Dolf Zillmann argued in the 1986 publication "Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography" that extensive viewing of pornographic material produces many unfavorable political effects, including a decreased respect for long-term monogamous relationships, and an attenuated desire for procreation. He describes the theoretical basis of these experimental findings:
The values expressed in pornography clash so obviously with the family concept, and they potentially undermine the traditional values that favor marriage, family, and children... Pornographic scripts dwell on sexual engagements of parties who have just met, who are in no way attached or committed to each other, and who will part shortly, never to meet again... Sexual gratification in pornography is not a function of emotional attachment, of kindness, of caring, and especially not of continuance of the relationship, as such continuance would translate into responsibilities, curtailments, and costs...
A study by Zillman in 1982 also indicated that prolonged exposure to pornography desensitized both men and women toward victims of sexual violence. After being shown pornographic movies, test subjects were asked to judge an appropriate punishment for a rapist. The test subjects recommended incarceration terms that were significantly more lenient than those recommended by control subjects who had not watched pornography.
Some researchers like Zillman believe that pornography causes unequivocal harm to society by increasing rates of sexual assault. Other researchers believe that there is a correlation between pornography and a decrease of sex crimes; exhibiting a strong disbelief in the claim that pornography is a cause of rape; mainstream science does not claim that pornography would be a cause of rape.
The appropriation of the sexually explicit in American culture is part of what has been called "the pornification of America".
In a 2021 review of recent pornography research, K. Camille Hoagland & Joshua B. Grubbs posit that "Specifically, mere pornography use itself was most often not associated with sexual functioning in either direction, but self-reported problematic use of pornography was consistently associated with more sexual functioning problems."
The impact of pornography can vary significantly among teenagers and across cultures, depending on specific constellations of personality traits. Research indicates that special attention may be required for highly frequent consumers of pornography, those who actively seek sexually violent content, and individuals with additional risk factors.
Male adolescents at a more advanced pubertal stage, characterized as sensation seekers with weak or troubled family relations, tended to use pornography more frequently. This usage correlated with more permissive sexual attitudes and stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. Additionally, it appeared to be associated with engaging in sexual intercourse, having greater experience with casual sex behavior, and an increased likelihood of involvement in sexual aggression, both as perpetrators and victims. The authors of the review state that the impact of pornography upon the brains of teenagers is a suggestion (what scientific literature suggests) rather than a scientific fact.
Rape culture is often discussed when it comes to pornography, and is defined by society victim-blaming women because of their rape. It is known as society making rape less substantial. Some of the most searched titles on pornography websites is rape scenes.
In 2016, model and actress Pamela Anderson and Orthodox Rabbi Shmuley Boteach co-authored a viral Wall Street Journal opinion piece, in which they called online pornography a "public hazard of unprecedented seriousness." The two called for a "sensual revolution" to replace "pornography with eroticism, the alloying of sex with love, of physicality with personality, of the body's mechanics with imagination, of orgasmic release with binding relationships." They later gave a joint lecture at Oxford University to over 1,000 people. The two also wrote a book together, Lust for Love (2018), about how meaningful, passionate sex has been declining, and calling for a new sensual revolution that emphasizes partners connecting in the bedroom.
Some studies suggest that children and youths are more susceptible to the neurological effects of pornography consumption than adults, however this lacks direct empirical evidence. This can be attributed to considerable ethical problems with performing such research. Since those problems are a huge obstacle, it is likely that such research will not be allowed, thus possibly it could never be known. Rory Reid (UCLA) declared "Universities don't want their name on the front page of a newspaper for an unethical study exposing minors to porn."
While the World Health Organization's ICD-11 (2022) has recognized compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (CSBD) as an "impulsive control disorder", CSBD is not an addiction, and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5 (2013) and the DSM-5-TR (2022) do not classify compulsive pornography consumption as a mental disorder or a behavioral addiction. According to Emily F. Rothman, "The professional public health community is not behind the recent push to declare pornography a public health crisis." The ideas supporting the "crisis" have been described as pseudoscientific.
See also
- Anti-pornography movement in the United Kingdom
- Anti-pornography movement in the United States
- Criticism of Misplaced Pages § Sexual content
- Effects of pornography
- Nymwar
- Pornography addiction
- Pornography by region
- Religious views on pornography
- Stanley v. Georgia
- Scunthorpe problem
- Women Against Pornography
- Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media
References
- American Psychiatric Association (2013). Psychiatry Online. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596. ISBN 978-0-89042-555-8.
- ^ Rothman 2021, p. 103.
- ^ Martinez-Gilliard, Erin (2023). Sex, Social Justice, and Intimacy in Mental Health Practice: Incorporating Sexual Health in Approaches to Wellness. Taylor & Francis. p. unpaginated. ISBN 978-1-000-84578-5. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
'Sex addiction' is also referred to as a diagnosis or presenting problem. Sex addiction is not a diagnosis in the DSM-5-TR and identified as Compulsive Sexual Behavior in the ICD-11 rather than an issue of addiction.
- Prause, Nicole; Binnie, James (22 February 2023). "Iatrogenic effects of Reboot/NoFap on public health: A preregistered survey study" (PDF). Sexualities. SAGE Publications: 136346072311570. doi:10.1177/13634607231157070. ISSN 1363-4607. S2CID 257172274.
- "More Americans Say Pornography Is Morally Acceptable". Gallup.com. 2018-06-05. Retrieved 2020-03-12.
- ^ Lykke, Lucia; Cohen, Philip (2015). "The Widening Gender Gap in Opposition to Pornography, 1975–2012". Social Currents. 2 (4): 307–323. doi:10.1177/2329496515604170. S2CID 44232681.
- Slick, Matt (2008-12-11). "What does the Bible say about pornography? Is it wrong?". Retrieved 6 May 2013.
- Freeman, Tzvi. "What's Wrong With Pornography?". Retrieved 6 May 2013.
- Mujahid, Abdul Malik. "Islam on Pornography: A Definite No-No". Archived from the original on 9 May 2013. Retrieved 6 May 2013.
- "Bible Verses about Pornography". biblestudytools.com.
- Catechism of the Catholic Church. 1997. pp. CCC 2354.
- Rashid, Qasim (29 March 2017). "Muslim men need to understand that the Quran says they should observe hijab first, not women". Independent.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2022-05-24.
- Morgan, Robin (1974). "Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape". In: Going Too Far: The Personal Chronicle of a Feminist. Random House. ISBN 0-394-48227-1.
- MacKinnon, Catharine (1987). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 146–150.
- "Culture Reframed". Culture Reframed.
- Carol, Avedon. "The Harm of Porn: Just Another Excuse to Censor". The Law (June–July–August 1995). London. ISSN 1360-807X. Archived from the original on 2015-07-09.
- Nadine Strossen, "Feminist Critique of the Feminist Critique of Pornography, A Essay" (PDF). core.ac.uk. Retrieved 12 October 2021.
- Sherkat, Darren; Ellison, Christopher (1997). "The Cognitive Structure of a Moral Crusade: Conservative Protestantism and Opposition to Pornography". Social Forces. 75 (3): 957–980. doi:10.1093/sf/75.3.957. JSTOR 2580526.
- Nzwili, Fredrick (23 June 2020). "As underage pregnancies rise, Kenyan bishops warn against sex ed, abortion". Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on March 29, 2021. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
- ^ Schreiber, Ronnee (2008). Righting Feminism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Cole, Samantha (13 April 2021). "The Crusade Against Pornhub Is Going to Get Someone Killed". Vice. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
- Rosenbach, Marcel; Müller, Ann-Katrin; Höfner, Roman; Baumgärtner, Maik; Spiegel, Der (10 March 2021). "Hatred Against Women: The Dark World of Extremist Misogyny". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
- Ley, David J. (27 October 2018). "Is One Sexual Behavior Triggering Certain Groups?". Psychology Today. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ Zillmann, Dolf (4 August 1986). "Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health: Background Papers: 'Effects of Prolonged Consumption of Pornography'". profiles.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- Zillmann 1986, pp. 16–17.
- Simmons, Catherine A.; Lehmann, Peter; Collier-Tenison, Shannon (April 2008). "Linking male use of the sex industry to controlling behaviors in violent relationships: an exploratory analysis". Violence Against Women. 14 (4): 406–417. doi:10.1177/1077801208315066. PMID 18359877. S2CID 19294687.
-
- Diamond, Milton. "The Effects of Pornography: An International Perspective". Porn 101: Eroticism, Pornography, and the First Amendment, University of Hawaii. Archived from the original on 15 January 2008.
- Kendall, Todd. "Pornography, rape and the internet" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2006. Retrieved 25 October 2006.
- D'Amato, Anthony (June 23, 2006). "Porn Up, Rape Down". Northwestern Public Law Research Paper. doi:10.2139/ssrn.913013. SSRN 913013. id: 913013.
- Howitt, Dennis (2022). "9. Sexual offenders 1: rapists". Introduction to Forensic and Criminal Psychology (7 ed.). Pearson Education Limited. p. 166. ISBN 978-1-292-29580-0.
• Offenders use pornography, but developmental studies tend not to hold pornography responsible for creating their deviance. There is no simple relationship between sexual fantasy and offending.
- Moyer, Melinda Wenner (1 July 2011). "The Sunny Side of Smut". Scientific American. Retrieved 29 May 2024.
- McKee, Alan; Litsou, Katerina; Byron, Paul; Ingham, Roger (10 June 2022). What Do We Know About the Effects of Pornography After Fifty Years of Academic Research?. London: Routledge. p. 96. doi:10.4324/9781003232032. ISBN 978-1-003-23203-2.
- Whitehead, John W. "Miley Cyrus and the Pornification of America". rutherford.org. The Rutherford Institute. Retrieved 7 September 2014.
- Aucoin, Don (January 24, 2006). "The pornification of America. From music to fashion to celebrity culture, mainstream entertainment reflects an X-rated attitude like never before". Boston Globe. Retrieved 7 September 2014.
- Hoagland, K. Camille; Grubbs, Joshua B. (2021-09-01). "Pornography Use and Holistic Sexual Functioning: a Systematic Review of Recent Research". Current Addiction Reports. 8 (3): 408–421. doi:10.1007/s40429-021-00378-4. ISSN 2196-2952.
- Malamuth, N.; Huppin, M. (June 2005). "Pornography and Teenagers: The Importance of Individual Differences". Adolescent Medicine Clinics. 16 (2): 315–326. doi:10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.004. ISSN 1547-3368.
- ^ Peter, Jochen; Valkenburg, Patti M. (2016-05-03). "Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research". The Journal of Sex Research. 53 (4–5): 509–531. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441. ISSN 0022-4499.
- Makin, David A.; Morczek, Amber L. (June 2015). "The dark side of internet searches: a macro level assessment of rape culture" (PDF). International Journal of Cyber Criminology. 9 (1): 1–23. doi:10.5281/zenodo.22057.
- Boteach, Shmuley; Anderson, Pamela (August 31, 2016). "Take the Pledge: No More Indulging Porn". The Wall Street Journal.
- Kurson, Ken (September 20, 2016). "Talking Porn With Pamela Anderson and Rabbi Shmuley". The Observer.
- ^ Daniel Sugarman. "Shmuley Boteach and Pamela Anderson in joint warning on dangers of pornography," Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine The Jewish Chronicle.
- Saner, Emine (October 14, 2016). "The playmate and the rabbi: unlikely bedfellows fighting internet porn". The Guardian. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
- ^ Lewak, Doree (April 18, 2018). "Sex tips from Pamela Anderson and an Orthodox rabbi". The New York Post.
- Boteach, Shmuley (August 13, 2018). "Porn is ravishing a generation of good men". The Jerusalem Post.
- Brown, Jennifer A.; Wisco, Jonathan J. (2019). "The components of the adolescent brain and its unique sensitivity to sexually explicit material". Journal of Adolescence. 72. Elsevier BV: 10–13. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.01.006. ISSN 0140-1971. PMID 30754014. S2CID 73442225.
- Binik, Yitzchak M.; Mah, Kenneth; Kiesler, Sara (1999). "Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the internet". Journal of Sex Research. 36 (1). Informa UK Limited: 82–90. doi:10.1080/00224499909551971. ISSN 0022-4499.
- ^ Segal, David (4 April 2014). "Does porn harm children?". Dallas News. Retrieved 14 April 2021.
- ^ Segal, David (28 March 2014). "Opinion - Does Porn Hurt Children?". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- "Compulsive sexual behavior disorder". World Health Organization (ICD-11). Retrieved 2022-03-25.
- Ley, David J. (24 January 2018). "Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder in ICD-11". Psychology Today. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
- Sassover, Eli; Weinstein, Aviv (29 September 2020). "Should compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) be considered as a behavioral addiction? A debate paper presenting the opposing view". Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 11 (2). Akademiai Kiado Zrt.: 166–179. doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00055. ISSN 2062-5871. PMC 9295215. PMID 32997646. S2CID 222167039.
- a verified Counsellor or Therapist (18 January 2021). "Do I have compulsive sexual behaviour?". Counselling Directory. Retrieved 26 March 2022.
"Materials related to the ICD-11 make very clear that CSBD is not intended to be interchangeable with 'sex addiction', but rather is a substantially different diagnostic framework." ICD-11. World Health Organisation.
- Neves, Silva (2021). Compulsive Sexual Behaviours: A Psycho-Sexual Treatment Guide for Clinicians. Taylor & Francis. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-000-38710-0. Retrieved 26 March 2022.
... materials in ICD-11 make very clear that CSBD is not intended to be interchangeable with sex addiction, but rather is a substantially different diagnostic framework
- Weir, Kirsten (April 2014). "Is pornography addictive?". Monitor on Psychology. 45 (4): 46. ISSN 1529-4978. OCLC 612512821. Archived from the original on 2014-04-05.
- Allez, Glyn Hudson, ed. (4 June 2014). "Chapter Ten. The pleasure, the power, and the perils of Internet pornography". Sexual Diversity and Sexual Offending: Research, Assessment, and Clinical Treatment in Psychosexual Therapy. Karnac Books. p. 161. ISBN 978-1-78181-368-3. Retrieved 27 April 2019.
- Since it is neither of two behavioral addictions mentioned in the DSM-5 or DSM-5-TR.
- American Psychiatric Association (2022). "Conditions for Further Study". Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR(tm)). G - Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. American Psychiatric Association Publishing. p. 916. ISBN 978-0-89042-576-3.
Excessive use of the Internet not involving playing of online games (e.g., excessive use of social media, such as Facebook; viewing pornography online) is not considered analogous to Internet gaming disorder, and future research on other excessive uses of the Internet would need to follow similar guidelines as suggested herein. Excessive gambling online may qualify for a separate diagnosis of gambling disorder.
- American Psychiatric Association (2022). "Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders". Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR(tm)). G - Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. American Psychiatric Association Publishing. p. 543. ISBN 978-0-89042-576-3.
In addition to the substance-related disorders, this chapter also includes gambling disorder, reflecting evidence that gambling behaviors activate reward systems similar to those activated by drugs of abuse and that produce some behavioral symptoms that appear comparable to those produced by the substance use disorders. Other excessive behavioral patterns, such as Internet gaming (see "Conditions for Further Study"), have also been described, but the research on these and other behavioral syndromes is less clear. Thus, groups of repetitive behaviors, sometimes termed behavioral addictions (with subcategories such as "sex addiction," "exercise addiction," and "shopping addiction"), are not included because there is insufficient peer-reviewed evidence to establish the diagnostic criteria and course descriptions needed to identify these behaviors as mental disorders.
- Rothman, Emily F. (2021). Pornography and Public Health. Oxford University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-19-007549-1. Retrieved 31 May 2022.
The professional public health community is not behind the recent push to declare pornography a public health crisis.
- de Jong, David C.; Faulkenberry, Rachel S.; Konda, Olivia; Joyner, Berkley (2022). "Masturbation". Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Elsevier. pp. 369–378. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91497-0.00075-8. ISBN 9780323914987.
Further reading
Anti-pornography advocacy
- Susan Brownmiller (1999). In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution. The Dial Press. ISBN 0-385-31486-8.
- Victor Cline (1994). Pornography effects: Empirical and clinical evidence. ISBN 1136690204
- Nikki Craft, long-time political, anti-pornography activist and prolific writer on feminist subjects
- Andrea Dworkin (1979). Pornography: Men Possessing Women. ISBN 0-452-26793-5.
- Susan Griffin. Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature. New York: Harper, 1981.
- Craig Gross, founder of XXXchurch.com, a non-profit Christian organization that educates on the dangers of pornography use and involvement
- Robert Jensen (2007). Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press. ISBN 978-0-89608-776-7.
- Gail Dines / Robert Jensen / Ann Russo (1998). Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91813-8.
- Susanne Kapeller (1986). The Pornography of Representation. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK ISBN 0-7456-0122-7.
- Michael Kimmel (1991). Men Confront Pornography. New York: Meridian — Random House. ISBN 0-452-01077-2. (a variety of essays that try to assess ways that pornography may take influence or harm men)
- Shelley Lubben, former porn performer and self-described "porn missionary" who counsels active porn performers on how to escape the industry (2010). Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn: The Greatest Illusion on Earth. CreateSpace. ISBN 978-1-4538-6007-6.
- Catharine MacKinnon (1985). Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech. 20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1 (arguing that pornography is one of the mechanisms of power used to maintain gender inequality)
- Donny Pauling, former pornographic producer who currently speaks about the unseen side of porn that is damaging to the women involved; frequently worked with Craig Gross of XXXChurch, until pleading to a six-year underage sex sentencing
- Christine Stark and Rebecca Whisnant (2004). Not for sale: feminists resisting prostitution and pornography. North Melbourne, Victoria: Spinifex Press. 2004. ISBN 9781876756499.
Criticism of anti-pornography
- Susie Bright. "Susie Sexpert's Lesbian Sex World and Susie Bright's Sexual Reality: A Virtual Sex World Reader", San Francisco, CA: Cleis Press, 1990 and 1992. Challenges any easy equation between feminism and anti-pornography positions.
- Betty Dodson. "Feminism and Free speech: Pornography." Feminists for Free Expression 1993. 8 May 2002.
- Kate Ellis. Caught Looking: Feminism, Pornography, and Censorship. New York: Caught Looking Incorporated, 1986.
- Matthew Gever. "Pornography Helps Women, Society", UCLA Bruin, 1998-12-03.
- Michele Gregory. "Pro-Sex Feminism: Redefining Pornography (or, a study in alliteration: the pro pornography position paper) "
- Gayle Rubin, "Dangerous, Misguided, and Wrong: An Analysis of Anti-Pornograph Politics." In "Bad Girl and Dirty Pictures," ed. Carol Assuster (1993).
- Andrea Juno and V. Vale. Angry Women, Re/Search # 12. San Francisco, CA: Re/Search Publications, 1991. Performance artists and literary theorists who challenge Dworkin and MacKinnon's claim to speak on behalf of all women.
- "A Feminist Overview of Pornography, Ending in a Defense Thereof"
- "A Feminist Defense of pornography"
- Ley, David, Prause, Nicole, & Finn, Peter. (2014). The Emperor Has No Clothes: A review of the "Pornography Addiction" model. Current Sexual Health Reports, manuscript in press.
- Annalee Newitz. "Obscene Feminists: Why Women Are Leading the Battle Against Censorship." San Francisco Bay Guardian Online 8 May 2002. 9 May 2002
- Nadine Strossen:
- "Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women's Rights" (ISBN 0-8147-8149-7)
- "Nadine Strossen: Pornography Must Be Tolerated"
- Scott Tucker. "Gender, Fucking, and Utopia: An Essay in Response to John Stoltenberg's Refusing to Be a Man." in Social Text 27 (1991): 3-34. Critique of Stoltenberg and Dworkin's positions on pornography and power.
- Carole Vance, Editor. "Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality". Boston: Routledge, 1984. Collection of papers from 1982 conference; visible and divisive split between anti-pornography activists and lesbian S&M theorists.
Notes
- "Shelley Lubben - My Blog, Thoughts, and Life". www.shelleylubben.com. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- "Out of Pornography and Into the Light". CBN. Retrieved 2010-04-18.
- "Pro-Sex Feminism: Redefining Pornography". Archived from the original on 2002-08-09. Retrieved 2011-07-03.
- McElroy, Wendy. "A Feminist Overview of Pornography". www.wendymcelroy.com. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- Kreidler, Marc (July 26, 2019). "Search | Free Inquiry". Archived from the original on 1 December 1998.
- Ley, David; Prause, Nicole; Finn, Peter (2014). "The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the 'Pornography Addiction' Model". Current Sexual Health Reports. 6 (2): 94–105. doi:10.1007/s11930-014-0016-8. S2CID 55374203.
- "sfbg.com". sfbg.com. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- Strossen, Nadine (November 1995). "Pornography Must Be Tolerated". The Ethical Spectacle.
- Gross, Larry P.; Woods, James D. (8 April 1999). The Columbia Reader on Lesbians and Gay Men in Media, Society, and Politics. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231104463. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via Google Books.
Pornography | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pornography |
| ||||||||
Opposition to pornography |
| ||||||||
Views | |||||||||
Media | |||||||||
Possible effects | |||||||||
People | |||||||||
Events | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | |||||||||
See also |
| ||||||||