| Revision as of 15:29, 16 May 2013 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits apparent error | Latest revision as of 03:56, 31 January 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-comments-end/commentspage}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-comments-end/commentspage}} | ||
| <!-----------------------------------------------------------------------> | <!-----------------------------------------------------------------------> | ||
| * Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in ''March'' – two months ago. ] ]] 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | * Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in ''March'' – two months ago. ] ]] 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| **The notifications in March, for instance , said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —] (]) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ***By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. ] ]] 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ****Not sure how happy it is, or how arb-staleness is measured, but I have noticed that anything with a discretionary sanctions component seems to be getting ] down the road these days. —] (]) 07:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:56, 31 January 2023
← Back to Arbitration report
Discuss this story
- Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in March – two months ago. AGK 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The notifications in March, for instance here, said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —Neotarf (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. AGK 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure how happy it is, or how arb-staleness is measured, but I have noticed that anything with a discretionary sanctions component seems to be getting kicked down the road these days. —Neotarf (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. AGK 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The notifications in March, for instance here, said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —Neotarf (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)