| Revision as of 23:17, 19 May 2013 editDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,483 edits Comments on your edits to Nazi Germany← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:53, 17 November 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,241 editsm Fixing Lint errors from Misplaced Pages:Linter/Signature submissions (Task 31)Tags: Fixed lint errors paws [2.2] | ||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == |
== May 2013 == | ||
| Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be ] from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a ] called the '''three-revert rule''' ('''3RR'''), the violation of which often leads to a block. The three-revert rule states: | |||
| == Time to learn what consesnsus is == | |||
| {{divbox|blue|radius=1em||An editor must not perform '''more than three reverts''' on a '''single page'''—whether involving the same or different material—within a '''24-hour period'''. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as an edit-warring violation.}}] (]) 16:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :We have an informal process that most follow when there is a dispute about content as outlined at ]. Please come to the talk page. You may have noticed I agree with one of your edits and would like you to join the talk page on the matter over getting blocked. You may have noticed that I had restored the article to its original version before the content dispute despite agreeing with a portion of your edit - this is because there is a debate about that term thus the article should remain as it was till it is all worked out.] (]) 18:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Just saw the Edit summary you attached to your update to ]. I have no comment on the edit itself, but to say that you "''have consensus now it is three users to one''" shows an incorrect (and quite possibly very provocative) understanding of ]. Please click on that link, and note especially that consensus is not the result of a vote. It requires a lot more than that. ] (]) 07:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi Peterzor. I can understand your enthusiasm and your desire to improve the ] article. But that's not what's actually happening. Your edit warring to insert factually incorrect and/or grammatically incorrect material into the lede is actually holding up development of the article, because to be promoted to ] status, the article will have to be stable, and right now it's not, because of the edit warring. The article would also would fail GA with factually and/or grammatically incorrect material in the lead, so I will have to continue to revert you. As someone who has helped promote quite a few articles to to GA status and has even helped edit Featured Articles, I can tell you that a professional level of English is required for these promotions. Please consider finding some other way to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thank you, -- ] (]) 23:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Svenskarnas parti== | |||
| I don't know which is the "flag". Do you mean http://www.svenskarnasparti.se/wp-content/uploads/folkfronten-symbol-200.jpg ? -- ] (]) 17:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :not really that was a logo while http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=112&artikel=3649270 is their flag | |||
| or this more specific http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/se%7Dnaz.html (the bottom of the page) ] (]) 17:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == You know better, as evidence by your own statements in these diffs == | |||
| After , with this , why would you do ? Gain consensus on the article talk page for these edits. Thank you, ]] 08:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Communist party of ukraine logo.png== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 17 November 2024
May 2013
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Time to learn what consesnsus is
Just saw the Edit summary you attached to your update to Nazi Germany. I have no comment on the edit itself, but to say that you "have consensus now it is three users to one" shows an incorrect (and quite possibly very provocative) understanding of WP:CONSENSUS. Please click on that link, and note especially that consensus is not the result of a vote. It requires a lot more than that. HiLo48 (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Svenskarnas parti
I don't know which is the "flag". Do you mean http://www.svenskarnasparti.se/wp-content/uploads/folkfronten-symbol-200.jpg ? -- AnonMoos (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- not really that was a logo while http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=112&artikel=3649270 is their flag
or this more specific http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/se%7Dnaz.html (the bottom of the page) Peterzor (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
You know better, as evidence by your own statements in these diffs
After this, with this response, why would you do this? Gain consensus on the article talk page for these edits. Thank you, Heiro 08:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Communist party of ukraine logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Communist party of ukraine logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
