Misplaced Pages

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:29, 27 May 2013 view source122.178.169.239 (talk) Early life and educationTag: section blanking← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:16, 26 December 2024 view source AssanEcho (talk | contribs)203 editsm corrected deep link in lead so that it links to the ten conditions and not just the ritual's page 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Indian religious leader and founder of the Ahmadiyya community (1835–1908)}}
{{For|the critic of ] and leader of ]|Ghulam Ahmed Pervez}}
<!--Do NOT add citations to the lead, except for material likely to be challenged, per ] (]. Move unneeded citations to the body.-->{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{Use British English|date=May 2012}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2012}} {{Use Indian English|date=March 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2020}}
{{Infobox caliph
| name = Mīrzā Ghulām Aḥmad
| title = Founder of <br />The Ahmadiyya Movement
| image = Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (c. 1897).jpg
| caption =
| othertitles = Claimed to be ] (divine reformer) of the fourteenth ], the Promised ] (]), and the ] awaited by the Muslims in the ].<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/books/3in1/chap2/index.html |title=Chapter Two – Claims of Hadhrat Ahmad |publisher=Alislam.org |date=1904-06-24 |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">“The Fourteenth-Century's Reformer / Mujaddid”, from the “Call of Islam”, by ]</ref>
| full name = Mīrzā Ghulām Aḥmad
| spouse 1 = Hurmat Bibi
| spouse 2 = Nusrat Jehan Begum
| offspring = ]<br /> Mirza Bashir Ahmad<br />Mirza Sharif Ahmad<br />Mubarika Begum<br /> Amatul Hafeez Begum
| father = Mirza Ghulam Murtaza
| mother = Chiragh Bibi
| birth_date = {{birth date|df=yes|1835|2|13}}
| birth_place = ], ]
| death_date = {{death date and age|df=yes|1908|5|26|1835|2|13}}
| death_place = ], ]
| burial_date =
| burial_place = ], ], India
}}
{{Ahmadiyya|amj}}


{{Infobox clergy|honorific prefix=|name=Mīrzā Ghulām Aḥmad <br/>{{nq|{{nobold|مرزا غلام احمد}}}}|title=Founder of the ]|image=Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (c. 1897).jpg|caption=Ahmad, {{circa|1897}}|religion=] Islam<ref name="Upal 2021">{{cite book |author-last=Upal |author-first=M. Afzal |author-link=Afzal Upal |year=2021 |chapter=The Cultural Genetics of the Aḥmadiyya Muslim Jamāʿat |editor1-last=Cusack |editor1-first=Carole M. |editor1-link=Carole M. Cusack |editor2-last=Upal |editor2-first=M. Afzal |title=Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements |location=] and ] |publisher=] |series=Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion |volume=21 |doi=10.1163/9789004435544_034 |doi-access=free |isbn=978-90-04-43554-4 |issn=1874-6691 |pages=637–657}}</ref><ref name="Korbel-Preckel 2016">{{cite book |last1=Korbel |first1=Jonathan |last2=Preckel |first2=Claudia |year=2016 |chapter=Ghulām Aḥmad al-Qādiyānī: The Messiah of the Christians—Peace upon Him—in India (India, 1908) |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZtY6DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA426 |editor1-last=Bentlage |editor1-first=Björn |editor2-last=Eggert |editor2-first=Marion |editor3-last=Krämer |editor3-first=Hans-Martin |editor4-last=Reichmuth |editor4-first=Stefan |editor4-link=Stefan Reichmuth (academic) |title=Religious Dynamics under the Impact of Imperialism and Colonialism |series=Numen Book Series |volume=154 |location=] |publisher=] |pages=426–442 |doi=10.1163/9789004329003_034 |isbn=978-90-04-32511-1}}</ref>|spouse={{unbulleted list|{{marriage|Hurmat Bibi|1852}}|{{marriage|]|1884}}}}|children={{Collapsible list|titlestyle=font-weight:normal; background:transparent; text-align:left;|title=|Mirza Sultan Ahmad|Mirza Fazal Ahmad|]|]|Mirza Sharif Ahmad|Mirza Mubarak Ahmad||Mubarika Begum|Amatul Naseer Begum |Amatul Hafeez Begum}}|birth_date={{birth date|df=yes|1835|2|13}}|birth_place=], ], ] <br /> {{small|(present-day ], ])}}|death_date={{death date and age|df=yes|1908|5|26|1835|2|13}}|death_place=], ], ] <br /> {{small|(present-day ], ])}}}}
'''Mīrzā Ghulām Aḥmad'''<ref> Sunday Herald, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., 1907</ref> (]: ميرزا غلام أحمد; ]: {{Nastaliq|'''مرزا غلام احمد'''}}; February 13, 1835 – 26 May 1908 CE, or 14 ] 1250 – 24 ] 1326 ]) was a religious figure from ] and the founder of the ] movement.
'''Mirza Ghulam Ahmad'''{{Efn|{{langx|ur|{{nq|مرزا غلام احمد}}|Mirzā Ghulām Aḥmad}}}} (13 February 1835 – 26 May 1908) was an Indian religious leader and the founder of the ]. He claimed to have been divinely appointed as the promised ] and '']'', in fulfillment of the ], as well as the '']'' (centennial reviver) of the 14th ].{{Ahmadiyya|amj}}


Born to a family with aristocratic roots in ], rural ], Ahmad emerged as a writer and debater for ]. When he was just over forty years of age, his father died and around that time he claimed that ] began to communicate with him. In 1889, he took a ] from forty of his supporters at ] and formed a community of followers upon what he claimed was divine instruction, stipulating ], an event that marks the establishment of the Ahmadiyya movement. The mission of the movement, according to him, was the reinstatement of the ] of God, the revival of Islam through the moral reformation of society along Islamic ideals, and the global propagation of Islam in its pristine form. As opposed to the Christian and mainstream Islamic view of Jesus (or Isa), being alive in heaven to return towards the end of time, Ahmad asserted that he had in fact survived crucifixion and ]. He traveled extensively across the Punjab preaching his religious ideas and rallied support by combining a reformist programme with his personal revelations which he claimed to receive from God, attracting thereby substantial following within his lifetime as well as considerable hostility particularly from the Muslim '']''. He is known to have engaged in numerous public debates and dialogues with Christian missionaries, Muslim scholars and Hindu revivalists.
He claimed to be the ] (divine reformer) of the fourteenth ], the Promised ] (]), and the ] awaited by the Muslims in the ].<ref name="ReferenceA"/><ref name="ReferenceB"/> However, he remains a controversial figure and is regarded by orthodox Muslims as heretical because he claimed to be a non law-bearing (deputy) prophet after Muhammad, whom Muslims traditionally believe to be the final prophet sent to guide mankind.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8711026.stm|title=BBC News - Who are the Ahmadi}}</ref>
He declared that Jesus (]) had in fact ] and later died a natural death after having migrated towards ], and that the notion of his physical return was therefore erroneous. He declared that he had appeared in the spirit and power of Jesus.<ref>.</ref>


Ahmad was a prolific author and wrote ] on various religious, theological and moral subjects between the publication of the first volume of '']'' (The Proofs of Ahmadiyya, his first major work) in 1880 and his death in May 1908. Many of his writings bear a ] and ] tone in favour of Islam, seeking to establish its superiority as a religion through rational argumentation, often by articulating his own interpretations of Islamic teachings. He advocated a peaceful propagation of Islam and emphatically argued against the permissibility of ] under circumstances prevailing in the present age. By the time of his death, he had gathered an estimated 400,000 followers, especially within the ], the Punjab and ] and had built a dynamic religious organisation with an executive body and its own printing press. After his death he was succeeded by his close companion ] who assumed the title of ] (successor of the Messiah).
He traveled extensively across the subcontinent of India preaching his religious ideas and ideals and won substantial following within his lifetime. He is known to have engaged in numerous debates and dialogues with the Muslim, Christian and ] ] and leadership. Ghulam Ahmad founded the ] on 23 March 1889. The mission of the movement, according to him, was the propagation of Islam in its pristine form.<ref name="overview">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/introduction/ |title=Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, An Overview |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>


Although Ahmad is revered by Ahmadi Muslims as the promised Messiah and Imām Mahdi, ] nevertheless remains the central figure in Ahmadiyya Islam. Ahmad's claim to be a subordinate (''ummati'') ] has remained a central point of controversy between his followers and mainstream Muslims, who believe Muhammad to be the last prophet.
Ghulam Ahmad ] on various religious, spiritual and theological issues.<ref>{{cite web|author=Rehan |url=http://rehanqayoompoet.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/complete-list-of-works-of-hadhrat-mirza.html |title=Complete List of the Works of Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835–1908) |publisher=Rehanqayoompoet.blogspot.co.uk |date=2011-06-21 |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> He advocated a peaceful propagation of Islam and emphatically argued against the necessity of ] in its military form in the present age.<ref name="overview" />

==Lineage and family==
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a descendant of ], a member of the ].{{sfn|Khan|2015|p=21}} In 1530, Mirza Hadi Beg migrated from ]<ref> Vol. '''37'''. The Victoria Institute, Great Britain. Original from the ], p. 242.</ref> (present-day ]) along with an entourage of two hundred people consisting of his family, servants and followers.<ref> by Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmood Ahmad.</ref><ref name="apnaorg.com">{{Cite web|url=https://apnaorg.com/books/punjab-chiefs/index.html|title=Complete Book: Chiefs of Punjab by Lepel Griffin|website=apnaorg.com}}</ref>{{sfn|Khan|2015|p=22}} Travelling through ], they finally settled in the Punjab, India, where Mirza Hadi founded the town known today as ] during the reign of ] ]{{sfn|Khan|2015|p=22}} his distant relative. The family were all known as Mughals within the British governmental records of India probably due to the high positions it occupied within the ] and their courts. Mirza Hadi Beg was granted a ] of several hundred villages and was appointed the ] (judge) of Qadian and the surrounding district. The descendants of Mirza Hadi are said to have held important positions within the Mughal Empire and had consecutively been the chieftains of Qadian.<ref name="apnaorg.com"/>


==Life== ==Life==


===Taking of the covenant=== ===Early life and education===
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was born on 13 February 1835 in ], Punjab, then part of the ] under ] ({{Reign|1801|1839}}). The surviving child of twins born to an affluent Mughal family.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ahmad |first=Basharat |title=The Great Reformer: Biography of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (Volume 1) |publisher=AAIIL Inc USA |year=2008 |isbn=978-0913321980 |pages=24}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Dard |first=Abdur Rahim |title=Life of Ahmad |publisher=Islam International Publications Ltd |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-85372-977-5 |location=United Kingdom |pages=33}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Evans |first=Nicholas H. A. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1107057359 |title=Far from the Caliph's Gaze: Being Ahmadi Muslim in the Holy City of Qadian |date=2020 |isbn=978-1-5017-1571-6 |location=Ithaca |pages=1 |oclc=1107057359}}</ref> He learned to read the Arabic text of the ] and studied basic Arabic grammar and the Persian language from a teacher named Fazil-e-Illahi. At the age of 10, he learned from a teacher named Fazl Ahmad. Again at the age of 17 or 18, he learnt from a teacher named Gul Ali Shah.<ref>{{cite book |title=Hadhrat Ahmad|year=1998|publisher=Islam International Publications|location=Athens, Ohio|oclc=45764230|page=15|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Hadhrat-Ahmad-20080514MN.pdf}}</ref> In addition, he also studied some works on medicine from his father, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, who was a physician. Ahmad's father, ], was a local chieftain ({{Transliteration|ar|]}}) who served in the Sikh Army.{{sfn|Khan|2015|p=23}}
] c.1897]]

From 1864 to 1868, upon his father's wishes, Ahmad worked as a clerk in ], where he would come into contact with Christian missionaries with whom he frequently engaged in debate. After 1868, he returned to Qadian, as per his father's wishes, where he was entrusted to look after some estate affairs. During all this time, Ahmad was known as a social recluse because he would spend most of his time in seclusion studying religious books and praying in the local mosque. As time passed, he began to engage more with the Christian missionaries, particularly in defending Islam against their criticism.<ref name="Upal 2021" /><ref name="Korbel-Preckel 2016" /> He would often confront them in public debates, especially the ones based in the town of ].<ref>http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad-20080411MN.pdf<nowiki/>.{{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref>

In 1886, certain leaders of the ] held discussion and debate with Ahmad about the truthfulness of Islam and asked for a sign to prove that Islam was a living religion. In order to dedicate special prayers for this purpose and so as to seek further divine guidance, Ahmad travelled to ] upon what he claimed was divine instruction. Here, he spent forty days in seclusion, a practice known as '']''. He travelled accompanied by three companions to the small two-storied house of one of his followers and was left alone in a room where his companions would bring him food and leave without speaking to him as he prayed and contemplated. He only left the house on Fridays and used an abandoned mosque for ] (Friday prayers). It is during this period that he declared God had given him the glad tidings of an illustrious son.<ref>, p. 91.</ref><ref>, The Ahmadiyya Gazette, February 1997.</ref>

===Taking of the ''Bay'ah''===
{{See also|Bay'ah (Ahmadiyya)|Ten Conditions of Bai'at}} {{See also|Bay'ah (Ahmadiyya)|Ten Conditions of Bai'at}}
] {{Circa|1899}}.]]


Ghulam Ahmad claimed divine appointment as a reformer as early as 1882 but did not take any pledge of allegiance or initiation. In December 1888, Ahmad announced that God had ordained that his followers should enter into a ] with him and pledge their allegiance to him. In January 1889, he published a pamphlet in which he laid out ten conditions or issues to which the initiate would abide by for the rest of his life.<ref name="alislam.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/10.html |title=Ten Conditions of Baiat |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> On 23 March 1889, he founded the Ahmadiyya community by taking a pledge from forty followers.<ref name="alislam.org"/> The formal method of joining the Ahmadiyya movement included joining hands and reciting a pledge, although physical contact was not always necessary. This method of allegiance continued for the rest of his life and after his death by his ].<ref name="history_10">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/10.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – Founding of Ahmadiyya Jamaat |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Ahmad claimed divine appointment as a reformer as early as 1882 but did not take any pledge of allegiance or initiation. In December 1888, Ahmad announced that God had ordained that his followers should enter into a {{Transliteration|ar|]}} with him and pledge their allegiance to him.<ref>Yohanan Friedmann. ''Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and its Medieval Background'' Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 140. "Like Muḥammad, he was then forty years of age; he was privileged in the beginning with a "good dream" (''ru'yā ṣāliḥa''), shown to him as "the break of dawn" (''mithl falaq al-ṣubḥ''). And when Ghulām Aḥmad's father died, Allāh revealed to him the ''Sūrat al-Ḍuḥā'', which speaks of Allāh's help to Muḥammad when he was a destitute orphan."</ref><ref>Simon Ross Valentine. '''' Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 42. "Following the death of his father in 1876 Ahmad claimed to receive visions and revelations. 'In short', he declared, 'about forty years of my life were spent under the care of my revered father. Just as he was taken from the world, I started receiving Divine revelations with great intensity'. Having commenced receiving revelations at roughly the same age as the prophet Muhammad himself, Ahmad described his experiences in similar terms to the revelations received by the Prophet."</ref><ref>Louis J. Hammann. Ahmadiyya Muslim Community , 1985 "It was not, however, until his 41st year (1876) that Hazrat Ahmad began to receive the revelations that would lead him eventually to the conviction that in his person the advent of the Mahdi was fulfilled."</ref> In January 1889, he published a pamphlet in which he laid out ten conditions or issues to which the initiate would abide by for the rest of his life.<ref name="alislam.org">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/10.html |title=Ten Conditions of Baiat |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Ten Conditions of Bai'at |url=http://www.alislam.org/apps/cob/webapp/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110127184453/http://www.alislam.org/apps/cob/webapp/ |archive-date=27 January 2011}}</ref><ref>], ''The ] Movement: A Historical Survey'', {{ISBN|965-264-014-X}}, p. 5.</ref>{{Sfn|Khan|2015|p=38–39}} On 23 March 1889, he founded the Ahmadiyya community by taking a pledge from forty followers.<ref name="alislam.org"/> The formal method of joining the Ahmadiyya movement included joining hands and reciting a pledge, although physical contact was not always necessary. This method of allegiance continued for the rest of his life and after his death by his ].<ref name="history_10">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/10.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – Founding of Ahmadiyya Jamaat |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref>


=== His claim === ===His claim===
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad proclaimed that he was the ] and Mahdi. He claimed to be the fulfilment of various prophecies found in world religions regarding the second coming of their founders. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's followers say that he never claimed to be the same physical Jesus who lived nineteen centuries earlier. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Jesus died a natural death,<ref name="ShaeferCohen">{{cite book |last1=Schäfer |first1=Peter |title=Toward the Millennium: Messianic Expectations from the Bible to Waco |last2=Cohen |first2=Mark R. |publisher=Brill/Princeton UP |year=1998 |isbn=90-04-11037-2 |location=Leiden/Princeton |pages=306–7}}</ref> in contradiction to the traditional Muslim view of Jesus' physical ascension to heaven and the traditional Christian belief of Jesus' crucifixion.<ref name="tadhkirah">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Tadhkirah.pdf |title=Tadhkirah |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref> He claimed in his books that there was a general decay of Islamic life and a dire need of a messiah.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/books/victoryofislam/VICTORY%20OF%20ISLAM.pdf |title=Fatah-Islam (1890) |access-date=20 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102194813/http://www.alislam.org/books/victoryofislam/VICTORY%20OF%20ISLAM.pdf |archive-date=2 November 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9UNvF3JcnK0C&q=elucidation+of+objectives |title=Tawdhi-i-Marām (1891) |access-date=20 May 2013|isbn=9781853727429 |last1=Ahmad |first1=Hazrat Mirza Ghulam |year=2004 |publisher=Islam International }}</ref><ref>Izāla-i-Auhām (1891).</ref> He argued that, just as Jesus had appeared in the 14th century after ], the promised messiah, i.e. the Mahdi, must also appear in the 14th century after Muhammad.
{{Main|Claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad}}
Ahmad proclaimed that he was the ] and Mahdi and that he was fulfilment of various prophecies. This sparked great controversy, especially among the Muslim and Christian clergy.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} Ahmad's followers say that he never claimed to be the same physical Jesus who lived nineteen centuries earlier. Ahmad claimed that Jesus died a natural death, in contradiction to the traditional Muslim view of Jesus' physical ascension to heaven and the traditional Christian belief of Jesus' crucifixion.<ref name="tadhkirah">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Tadhkirah.pdf |title=Tadhkirah |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> He claimed in his books that there was a general decay of Islamic life and a dire need of a messiah.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/books/victoryofislam/VICTORY%20OF%20ISLAM.pdf |title=Fatah-Islam (1890) |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9UNvF3JcnK0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=elucidation+of+objectives&lr=#PPP1,M1 |title=Tawdhi-i-Marām (1891) |publisher=Books.google.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref><ref>Izāla-i-Auhām (1891)</ref> He argued that just as Jesus had appeared 1400 years after the time of Moses, the promised messiah—i.e. the Mahdi—must also appear in the 14th century after the appearance of Muhammad.<ref>{{dead link|date=May 2013}}</ref>


In ''Tazkiratush-Shahadatain'', he wrote about the fulfilment of various prophecies. In it, he enumerated a variety of prophecies and descriptions from both the ] and ] relating to the advent of the Mahdi and the descriptions of his age, which he ascribed to himself and his age. These include assertions that he was physically described in the Hadith and manifested various other signs; some of them being wider in scope, such as focusing on world events coming to certain points, certain conditions within the Muslim community, and varied social, political, economic, and physical conditions.<ref>, p. 38, 39</ref> In ''Tazkiratush-Shahadatain'', he wrote about the fulfillment of various prophecies. In it, he enumerated a variety of prophecies and descriptions from both the ] and ] relating to the advent of the Mahdi and the descriptions of his age, which he ascribed to himself and his age. These include assertions that he was physically described in the Hadith and manifested various other signs; some of them being wider in scope, such as focusing on world events coming to certain points, certain conditions within the Muslim community, and varied social, political, economic, and physical conditions.<ref>, p. 38–39.</ref>


=== Post-claim === ===Post-claim===
In time, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's claims of being the ] (reformer) of his era became more explicit.<ref name="founder_ch4">, by Maulana Muhammad Ali, Chapter 4: Mahdi and Messiah</ref> In one of his most well-known and praised<ref name="critical_study">, by Abul Hasan Ali Nadw</ref> works, '']'', a voluminous work consisting of five parts, he claimed to be the Messiah of Islam,<ref name="founder_ch4" /> which has proven a strong challenge for Muslims to accept, since traditional Islamic thought maintained that Jesus will return in the flesh during the last age.<ref>, by Dr. Ahmad Shafaat, 2003, Islamic Perspectives</ref> Ahmad, by contrast, asserted that Jesus had in fact survived crucifixion and died of old age much later in ], where he had migrated. According to Ahmad, the promised Mahdi was a symbolic reference to a spiritual leader and not a military leader in the person of Jesus Christ as is believed by many Muslims. With this proclamation, he also rejected the idea of armed ] and argued that the conditions for such Jihad are not present in this age, which requires defending Islam by the pen and tongue but not with the sword.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Jihad-Brochure.pdf |title=Jihad Brochure |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> In time, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's claim of being the {{Transliteration|ar|]}} (reformer) of his era became more explicit.<ref name="founder_ch4">, by Maulana Muhammad Ali, Chapter 4: Mahdi and Messiah.</ref>{{Sfn|Khan|2015|p=42}}<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web |date=24 June 1904 |title=Chapter Two – Claims of Hadhrat Ahmad |url=http://www.alislam.org/books/3in1/chap2/index.html |access-date=20 May 2013 |publisher=Alislam.org}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">"The Fourteenth-Century's Reformer / Mujaddid", from the "Call of Islam", by ].</ref> In one of his most well-known and praised<ref name="critical_study"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141227230808/http://www.irshad.org/brochures/criticalstudy.php|date=27 December 2014}}, by ].</ref> works, '']'',<ref>{{Cite web |title=Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah (as) |url=https://www.alislam.org/articles/introducing-books-promised-messiah/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=An Introduction to the Hidden Treasures of Islam |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Hidden-Treasures-of-Islam.pdf}}</ref> a voluminous work, he claimed to be the Messiah of Islam.<ref name="Upal 2021" /><ref name="Korbel-Preckel 2016" /><ref name="founder_ch4"/> Muslims have maintained that Jesus will return in the flesh during the last age.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923170110/http://www.islamicperspectives.com/ReturnOfJesus.htm|date=23 September 2015}}, by Dr. Ahmad Shafaat, 2003, Islamic Perspectives.</ref> Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, by contrast, asserted that Jesus had in fact survived crucifixion and died of old age much later in ], where he had migrated. According to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the promised Mahdi was a symbolic reference to a spiritual leader and not a military leader in the person of Jesus Christ as is believed by many Muslims.<ref name="Upal 2021" /><ref name="Korbel-Preckel 2016" /><ref>Yohanan Friedmann. Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 121. "The affinity between the two can also be shown in the framework of Ghulām Aḥmad's prophetology. Muḥammad and Moses were similar to each other because they initiated the two prophetic chains; Jesus and Ghulām Aḥmad complete the divine scheme of things by terminating them. They must therefore also be similar. They resemble each other both in the circumstances of their appearance and in the nature of their prophetic mission. Both appeared when their respective communities were subject to foreign rule: the Jews under the Romans, and the Indian Muslims under the British. The religious conditions prevailing in their communities were also similar. The Jews were described in the ] (1:7) as "those who earned wrath" (''al-maghḍūb 'alayhim'') by their lack of religiosity and by rejecting the message of Jesus. Most Muslims of Ghulām Aḥmad's time can be described in similar terms: their spirituality is lost, and only rituals remain of their religion. Furthermore, they rejected Ghulām Aḥmad in the same way that the Jews had rejected Jesus. In addition to these similar circumstances, Ghulām Aḥmad's message resembles that of Jesus in two important characteristics: he does not advocate ''jihād'', and does not bring a new law, but strives rather to implement the ''sharī'a'' promulgated by his predecessor in the prophetic office. And to make the affinity between the two chains total, Ghulām Aḥmad is spiritually greater than Jesus in the same way that Muḥammad was greater than Moses."</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Essence of Islam, Vol. IV, p. 33<!-- Bot generated title --> |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Essence-4.pdf}}</ref> With this proclamation, he also rejected the idea of armed ] and argued that the conditions for such Jihad are not present in this age, which requires defending Islam by the pen and tongue but not with the sword.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Jihad-Brochure.pdf |title=Jihad Brochure |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref>{{Sfn|Friedmann|2003|pp=174–175}}<ref name="overview">{{cite web |title=Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, An Overview |url=http://www.alislam.org/introduction/ |access-date=20 May 2013 |publisher=Alislam.org}}</ref> Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote two books named ''Tuhfa-e-Qaiseriya'' and ''Sitara-e-Qaiseriya'' in which he invited Queen Victoria to embrace Islam and forsake Christianity.


===Reaction of religious scholars=== ===Reaction of religious scholars===
In time, the ] turned against him, and he was often branded as a heretic. His opponents accused him of working for the British Government due to the termination of armed ], since his claims of being the Mahdi were made around the same time as the Mahdi of Sudan (]). Many years after his death, he was again accused of working for the British to curb the Jihadi ideology of Muslims. Some ] turned against him, and he was often branded as a heretic, but many ] praised him like ], ] among many others who praised him for his defense of ]. After his death, opponents accused him of working for the British government due to the termination of armed ], since his claims of being the Mahdi were made around the same time as the Mahdi of Sudan (]).


Following his claim to be the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, one of his adversaries prepared a ] (decree) of disbelief against Ahmad, declaring him a ] (disbeliever), a deceiver, and a liar. The decree permitted killing him and his followers. It was taken all around India and was signed by some two hundred religious scholars.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/books/invitation/arg7.html |title=Argument 7: Defeat of Enemies |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Following his claim to be the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, one of his adversaries prepared a ] (decree) of disbelief against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, declaring him a ] (disbeliever), a deceiver, and a liar. The decree permitted killing him and his followers. It was taken all around India and was signed by some two hundred religious scholars.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/books/invitation/arg7.html |title=Argument 7: Defeat of Enemies |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=20 May 2013 |archive-date=8 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130208195442/http://www.alislam.org/books/invitation/arg7.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>


Some years later, a prominent Muslim leader and scholar, ], was to travel to the ] to collect the opinions of the religious scholars of Mecca and Madina. He compiled these opinions in his work ''Hussam ul Harmain'' (The sword of two sanctuaries ''on the slaughter-point of blasphemy and falsehood'');<ref>{{dead link|date=May 2013}}</ref> in it, Ghulam Ahmad was again labelled an apostate. The unanimous consensus of about thirty-four religious scholars was that Ghulam Ahmad's beliefs were blasphemous and tantamount to apostasy and that he must be punished by imprisonment and, if necessary, by execution. Some years later, a prominent Muslim leader and scholar, ], was to travel to the ] to collect the opinions of the religious scholars of Mecca and Madina. He compiled these opinions in his work '']'' (The Sword of the Two Holy Mosques)<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.alahazratnetwork.org/english/Hussam_ul_Harmain.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071127221039/http://www.alahazratnetwork.org/english/Hussam_ul_Harmain.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Hussam ul Harmain|archivedate=27 November 2007}}</ref> in it, Ahmad was again labelled an apostate. The unanimous consensus of about thirty-four religious scholars was that Ahmad's beliefs were blasphemous and tantamount to apostasy and that he must be punished by imprisonment and, if necessary, by execution.


===Journey to Delhi=== ===Journey to Delhi===
]]] ].]]


Ghulam Ahmad travelled to ], which was at the time considered a centre of religious learning and home to many prominent religious leaders, in 1891, with the intention of distinguishing what he believed to be the truth from falsehood. He published an advertisement in which he invited the scholars to accept his claim and to engage in a public debate with him regarding the life and death of ] (Jesus), particularly Maulana ] (1805-1901), who was a leading religious scholar. He also proposed three conditions that were essential for such a debate: that there should be a police presence to maintain peace, the debate should be in written form (for the purpose of recording what was said), and that the debate should be on the subject of the death of Jesus. Ahmad went to ], which was at the time considered a centre of religious learning and home to many prominent religious leaders, in 1891, with the intention of distinguishing what he believed to be the truth from falsehood. He published an advertisement in which he invited the scholars to accept his claim and to engage in a public debate with him regarding the life and death of ] (Jesus), particularly Maulana ] (1805–1901), who was a leading religious scholar. He also proposed three conditions that were essential for such a debate: that there should be a police presence to maintain peace, the debate should be in written form (for the purpose of recording what was said), and that the debate should be on the subject of the death of Jesus.


Eventually, it was settled, and Ahmad travelled to the ] (main mosque) of Delhi accompanied by twelve of his followers, where some 5,000&nbsp;people were gathered. Before the debate started, there was a discussion on the conditions, which led to the conclusion that the debate should not be upon the death of Jesus, but upon the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. He explained that his claim could only be discussed after the death of Jesus was proven, for Jesus was considered by many to be living and the one who will descend to Earth himself. Only when this belief was refuted could his claim to be the Messiah be discussed. Eventually, it was settled, and Ahmad travelled to the ] (main mosque) of Delhi accompanied by twelve of his followers, where some 5,000 people were gathered. Before the debate started, there was a discussion on the conditions, which led to the conclusion that the debate should not be upon the death of Jesus, but upon the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. He explained that his claim could only be discussed after the death of Jesus was proven, for Jesus was considered by many to be living and the one who will descend to Earth himself. Only when this belief was refuted could his claim to be the Messiah be discussed.


Upon this, there was a clamour among the crowds, and Ahmad was informed that the other party alleged that he was at odds with Islamic beliefs and was a disbeliever; therefore, it was not proper to debate with him unless he clarified his beliefs. Ahmad wrote his beliefs on a piece of paper and had it read aloud, but due to the clamour among the people, it could not be heard. Seeing that the crowd was drifting out of control and that violence was imminent, the police superintendent gave orders to disperse the audience, and the debate did not take place. A few days later, however, a written debate did take place between Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Maulwi Muhammad Bashir of ], which was later published. Upon this, there was a clamour among the crowds, and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was informed that the other party alleged that he was at odds with Islamic beliefs and was a disbeliever; therefore, it was not proper to debate with him unless he clarified his beliefs. Ahmad wrote his beliefs on a piece of paper and had it read aloud, but due to the clamour among the people, it could not be heard. Seeing that the crowd was drifting out of control and that violence was imminent, the police superintendent gave orders to disperse the audience, and the debate did not take place. A few days later, however, a written debate did take place between Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Maulwi Muhammad Bashir of ], which was later published.


Ghulam Ahmad is known to have travelled extensively across Northern India during this period of his life and to have held various debates with influential religious leaders.<ref name="life_of_ahmad">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad-20080411MN.pdf |title=Life of Ahmad, Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Ahmad is known to have travelled extensively across Northern India during this period of his life and to have held various debates with influential religious leaders.<ref name="life_of_ahmad">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad-20080411MN.pdf |title=Life of Ahmad, Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref>


===Challenge to opponents=== ===Challenge to opponents===
Ahmad published a book called ''The Heavenly Decree'', in which he challenged his opponents to a "spiritual duel" in which the question of whether someone was a Muslim or not would be settled by God based on the four criteria laid out in the Qur'an, namely, that a perfect believer will frequently receive glad tidings from God, that he will be given awareness about hidden matters and events of the future from God, that most of his prayers will be fulfilled and that he will exceed others in understanding novel finer points, subtleties and deeper meanings of the Qur'an.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/TheHeavenlyDecree.pdf |title=The Heavenly Decree |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Ahmad published a book called ''The Heavenly Decree'', in which he challenged his opponents to a "spiritual duel" in which the question of whether someone was a Muslim or not would be settled by God based on the four criteria laid out in the Qur'an, namely, that a perfect believer will frequently receive glad tidings from God, that he will be given awareness about hidden matters and events of the future from God, that most of his prayers will be fulfilled and that he will exceed others in understanding novel finer points, subtleties and deeper meanings of the Qur'an.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/TheHeavenlyDecree.pdf |title=The Heavenly Decree |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref>


=== The sun and moon eclipse === ===The Sun and Moon eclipse===
After announcing his claim to be the Messiah and Mahdi, his opponents demanded that he should produce the "heavenly sign" detailed in the tradition attributed to the 7th-century Imam ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/15.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – Sign of the Eclipses |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> also known as Muhammad bin Ali, in which it is stated about the appearance of the ]:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hyahya.org/mahdi03.php |title=The End Times and The Emergence Of The Mahdi |publisher=Hyahya.org |date=2003-11-15 |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> After announcing his claim to be the Messiah and Mahdi, his opponents demanded that he should produce the "heavenly sign" detailed in the tradition attributed to the 7th-century Imam ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/15.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – Sign of the Eclipses |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref> also known as Muhammad bin Ali, in which a certain sign is stated about the appearance of the ]:


{{Quotation|For our Mahdi there are two signs which have never appeared before since the creation of the heavens and the earth, namely the moon will be eclipsed on the first night in Ramadhan and the sun will be eclipsed on the middle day in the same month of Ramadhan, and these signs have not appeared since God created the heavens and the earth.|Dar Qutni Vol. 1, page 188}} {{Blockquote|For our Mahdi, there are two signs which have never happened since the earth and the heavens were created, i.e., the moon will be eclipsed on the first of the possible nights in the month of Ramadhan and the sun will be eclipsed in the middle of the possible days of the month of Ramadhan.|Dar Qutni Vol. 1, page 188<ref>{{cite web |title=Hadith on Imam Mahdi|url=https://www.alislam.org/library/links/00000202.html|website=alislam.org|access-date=20 March 2015|quote=In Dar Qutni, the sign of the appearance of the Imam Mahdi is given in the following Hadith: 'For our Mahdi, there are two signs which have never happened since the earth and the heavens were created, i.e., the moon will be eclipsed on the first of the possible nights in the month of Ramadhan and the sun will be eclipsed in the middle of the possible days of the month of Ramadhan.'}}</ref>}}


Ahmadis maintain that this prophecy was fulfilled in 1894/1895, about three years after Ghulam Ahmad proclaimed himself to be the Promised Mahdi and Messiah, with the lunar and solar eclipse during the month of Ramadhan. Ghulam Ahmad declared that this was a sign of his truth and was in fulfilment of the tradition or prophecy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/articles/new/TruthAboutEclipses.html |title=The Truth About Eclipses |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Ahmadis maintain that this prophecy was fulfilled in 1894 and again in 1895, about three years after Ahmad proclaimed himself to be the Promised Mahdi and Messiah, with the lunar and solar eclipse during the month of Ramadhan, according to the Ahmadiyya interpretation of the prophecy. Ahmad declared that this was a sign of his truth and was in fulfillment of the tradition or prophecy.<ref name="eclipses">{{cite web |url=https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/new/TruthAboutEclipses.html |title=The Truth About Eclipses|date=1999|access-date=22 March 2015}}</ref> The eclipses being a sign of the Mahdi are also mentioned specifically in the Letters of Rabbani by ].{{Citation needed|date=October 2019}}


Scientific historical records indicate these eclipses occurred at the following dates:
The occurrence has, however, faced some criticism, with critics of Ahmad asserting that this was a weak tradition with unreliable narrators, one that cannot be traced back to Muhammad himself,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.central-mosque.com/fiqh/mahdi.htm |title=Imam Mahdi and Ramadhan with two Eclipses |publisher=Central-mosque.com |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> and that such eclipses have taken place before. Ahmadis however argue that such eclipses have never taken place as a sign for the truth of any person, and that this sign being mentioned in other religious scriptures such as the Bible<ref>{{cite web|url=http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/kjv2www?specfile=/texts/english/religion/kjv/kjv-pub.o2w&act=surround&offset=4858733&tag=Matthew,+chapter+24&query=sun |title=The King James Bible: Matthew, chapter 24 |publisher=Etext.virginia.edu |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> and the Quran<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parsquran.com/data/show.php?lang=eng&user=eng&quantity=&sura=75&ayat=0 |title=Text of Quran: Chapter 75: Al-Qiyama (The Rising of the Dead) |publisher=Parsquran.com |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> and the fact that it actually took place while there was a claimant further enhances the reliability of the tradition.


{| class="wikitable"
The eclipses being a sign of the ] are also mentioned specifically in the ''Letters of Rabbani'' by ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jesuswillreturn.com/signs/signs006.html |title=by Harun Yahya |publisher=Jesus Will Return |date= |accessdate=2012-12-06}}</ref>
|-
! Eclipse
! Date
|-
| Partial lunar eclipse
| 1894 March 21 2pm UT (7pm)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/5MCLEmap/1801-1900/LE1894-03-21P.gif|title=NASA - eclipse 1894 March 21}}</ref>

|-
| Hybrid solar eclipse
| 1894 April 6 4am-7am UT (9am-11am)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsearch/SEsearchmap.php?Ecl=18940406|title=NASA - Hybrid Solar Eclipse of 1894 April 06|website=eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov}}</ref>
|-
| Total lunar eclipse
| 1895 March 11 03:39 UT<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://moonblink.info/Eclipse/eclipse/1895_03_11|title=Total Lunar Eclipse of 11 Mar, 1895 AD|website=moonblink.info}}</ref>
|-
| Partial solar eclipse
| 1895 March 23, 10:10 UT<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://moonblink.info/Eclipse/eclipse/1895_03_26|title=Partial Solar Eclipse of 26 Mar, 1895 AD|website=moonblink.info}}</ref>
|}


===Lawsuit=== ===Lawsuit===
In 1897, a Christian missionary, ], filed a lawsuit of attempted murder against Ahmad at the court of District ] Captain ] in the city of ]. The charge laid against him was that he hired a man by the name of Abdul Hameed to assassinate Clarke. However, he was not detained by the police and was declared innocent by the then-Magistrate Captain Douglas.<ref name="murder">{{cite book | title=Ahmad the Guided One | author=Ian Adamson | publisher=Islam International Publications Ltd | url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/guidedone/index.htm?page=177#top | pages=177–193 | isbn=1-85372-597-8}}</ref><ref name="lawsuit">{{cite web | url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/18.html | title=Lawsuit by Dr.Clarke | accessdate=25 January 2011 | publisher=Al Islam}}</ref> In 1897, a Christian missionary, ], filed a lawsuit of attempted murder against Ahmad at the court of District Magistrate Captain ] in the city of ]. The charge laid against him was that he hired a man by the name of Abdul Hameed to assassinate Clark. However, he was not detained by the police and was declared innocent by the then-magistrate Captain Douglas.<ref name="murder">{{cite book |title=Ahmad the Guided One |author=Ian Adamson |year=1999 |publisher=Islam International Publications Ltd |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/guidedone/index.htm?page=177#top |pages=177–193 |isbn=1-85372-597-8}}</ref><ref name="lawsuit">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/18.html |title=Lawsuit by Dr.Clark |access-date=25 January 2011 |publisher=Al Islam}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=March 2018}}

Ahmad was offered permission to sue the plaintiff. However, he declined to do so, stating that Clarke will be answerable to God.


===The Revealed Sermon=== ===The Revealed Sermon===
{{Main|The Revealed Sermon}} {{Main|The Revealed Sermon}}
In 1900, on the occasion of the festival of ], he is said to have delivered an hour-long sermon extempore in Arabic expounding the meaning and philosophy of sacrifice. This episode is celebrated as one of the important events of the history of Ahmadiyya. The sermon was simultaneously written down by two of his companions and came to be known as the ''Khutba Ilhamiyya'', the revealed or inspired sermon. Ahmadiyya literature states that during this sermon, there was a change in his voice, he appeared as if in a ], in the grip of an unseen hand, and as if a voice from the unknown had made him its mouthpiece. After the sermon ended, Ahmad fell into ], followed by the rest of the congregation, as a sign of gratitude towards God.<ref>, The Review of Religions, July 1993</ref> In 1900, on the occasion of the festival of ], he is said to have delivered an hour-long sermon extempore in Arabic expounding the meaning and philosophy of sacrifice. This episode is celebrated as one of the important events of the history of Ahmadiyya. The sermon was simultaneously written down by two of his companions and came to be known as the ''Khutba Ilhamiyya'', the revealed or inspired sermon. Ahmadiyya literature states that during this sermon, there was a change in his voice, he appeared as if in a ], in the grip of an unseen hand, and as if a voice from the unknown had made him its mouthpiece. After the sermon ended, Ahmad fell into ], followed by the rest of the congregation, as a sign of gratitude towards God.<ref>, The Review of Religions, July 1993.</ref>


Ahmad wrote later: Ahmad wrote later:
{{Quotation|It was like a hidden fountain gushing forth and I did not know whether it was I who was speaking or an angel was speaking through my tongue. The sentences were just being uttered and every sentence was a sign of God for me.|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|Haqeeqatul-Wahi<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/links/80-books.html |title=Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>}} {{Blockquote|It was like a hidden fountain gushing forth and I did not know whether it was I who was speaking or an angel was speaking through my tongue. The sentences were just being uttered and every sentence was a sign of God for me.|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|Haqeeqatul-Wahi<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/links/80-books.html |title=Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=2013-05-20}}</ref>}}


===Challenge to John Alexander Dowie===
===The Lahore controversy with Pir Meher Ali Shah===
] in his robes as "Elijah the Restorer."]]
] of ] is recognised by some as the person at the forefront in striving to bring Ghulam Ahmad and his movement down. {{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} He penned the book on the "apostasy" of Ahmad titled ''Sayf-e-Chishtia''. {{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} Meher Ali was one of the spiritual leaders whom Ghulam Ahmad had challenged collectively to a "prayer duel". On 20 July 1900, Ghulam Ahmad issued a poster in which he proposed a gathering at ] to hold a written contest in Arabic {{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} consisting of writing a commentary on forty verses (selected by ballot) of the Qur'an after invoking divine assistance.


In 1899, Scottish-born American clergyman ] laid claim to be the forerunner of the second coming of Christ. Ahmad exchanged a series of letters with him between 1903 and 1907. Ahmad challenged him to a prayer duel, where both would call upon God to expose the other as a false prophet. Ahmad stated:
According to the poster, the commentaries were to be written within seven hours and in the presence of witnesses, without the assistance of a book or any person. An hour was to be given for preparation. The commentaries were to span at least twenty pages, purely in Arabic. After their completion and signatures by the contestants, they were to be read out to three learned persons for adjudication, nominated and seen to by Meher Ali Shah. After listening to the two commentaries, the judges would pronounce on solemn triple oath which one was superior and written "with Divine endorsement".<ref name="thelightofgolrasharif">{{cite web|url=http://www.thelightofgolrasharif.com/Website/TheLightofGolraSharif/main_page.htm |title=Pir Syed Ghulam Qutb-ul-Haq Gilani |publisher=The Light of Golra Sharif |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>


{{Blockquote|The best way to determine whether Dowie's God is true or ours, is that Mr. Dowie should stop making prophecies about the destruction of all Muslims. Instead he should keep me alone in his mind and pray that if one of us is fabricating a lie, he should die before the other.|Ghulam Ahmad<ref name="history_30">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/30.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam: Death of Dr. Dowie |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=2013-05-20}}</ref>||source=}}
Pir Meher Ali Shah accepted the challenge to such a contest, provided that first an oral debate take place between him and Ghulam Ahmad on the issue of his claims. Ghulam Ahmad refused to debate. Ahmad's followers claim that he had categorically vowed in ''Anjam-e-Atham'' not to engage in any more debates, as he judged them ineffective at convincing the religious clergy to reform (the reason why he had challenged Meher Ali Shah to such a decisive contest in the first place and not to a debate); rather, he would invoke God for divine intervention by holding such contests or "prayer duels", which he called ''Ejazi-Muqabala'', or "miraculous contest", between him and his opponents, primarily Christian missionaries and Muslim scholars and divines.<ref name="life_of_ahmad" />


Dowie declined the challenge,<ref>S.R. Valentine, Islam and Ahmadiyya Jama'at, Foundation Books, 2008, p. 50.</ref> calling Mirza Ghulam Ahmad the "silly Mohammedan Messiah".{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} Ahmad prophesied:
This remains a point of contention between the followers of Ghulam Ahmad and those of Pir Meher Ali Shah. According to the followers of Meher Ali Shah, he travelled to Lahore, as per Ghulam Ahmad's proposal, where a large gathering of scholars and laymen had collected, and according to followers of Ghulam Ahmad, did so without notice. Ghulam Ahmad did not show up. Ahmadis argue that the condition of oral debate proposed by Meher Ali Shah was an indirect refusal of Ghulam Ahmad's challenge and a deliberate attempt to trap him, for if he had accepted, he would have broken his promise with God by engaging in debates, but if he had declined, it would have been assumed that Meher Ali Shah was victorious and Ghulam Ahmad had withdrawn.
{{Blockquote|Though he may try hard as he can to fly from death which awaits him, yet his flight from such a contest will be nothing less than death to him; and calamity will certainly overtake his Zion, for he must bear the consequences either of the acceptance of the challenge or its refusal. He will depart this life with great sorrow and torment during my lifetime.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}}}


The challenge of "prayer duel" was made by Mirza in September 1902. The ''Dictionary of American Biography'' states that after having been deposed during a revolt in which his own family was involved, Dowie endeavoured to recover his authority via the law courts without success and that he may have been a victim of some form of mania, as he suffered from hallucinations during his last illness.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks15/1500721h/0-dict-biogD.html#dowie1 |title=Dictionary of Australian Biography: John Alexander Dowie |publisher=Gutenberg.net.au |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref> Dowie died before Mirza, in March 1907.
Ghulam Ahmad later issued another poster describing his beliefs and requesting a written response from the Pir. {{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} Later, he published an advertisement proposing a battle of written commentary on the opening chapter of the Quran to settle their dispute. The two commentaries would be printed and published in book form within seventy days. A price of Rs.500 would be paid to Mehr Ali Shah if his commentary was adjudged by three scholars to be superior or equal to that of Ghulam Ahmad.<ref name="thelightofgolrasharif" /> The party failing to write and publish the proposed commentary within the stated period would be regarded as a liar, and no further proof for that purpose would be needed.

Ghulam Ahmad published his planned commentary under the title ''Ijaz-ul-Masih'' (''Miracle of the Massiah'').As per the challenge, Per Meher Ali Shah was to write a commentary on the opening chapter of the Quran in ].However Per Mehr Ali failed to write any commentary in Arabic on the opening chapter of the Quran. Instead he wrote a book in ] named ''Saif-e-Chishtiyyi''.<ref name="Fateh e Qadian Ya Guskah akhean ">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/urdu/pdf/Fateh-Qadian-Ya-Gustakh-20090318MN.pdf |title=Page 28 |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> That book was the collection of many allegations but it did not contain any commentary of Quran.

===Challenge to John Alexander Dowie===
] in his robes as "Elijah the restorer"]]
In 1899, Scottish-born American clergyman ] laid claim to be the forerunner of the second coming of Christ. Ghulam Ahmad exchanged a series of letters with him between 1903 and 1907. Ghulam Ahmad challenged him to a prayer duel, where both would call upon God to expose the other as a false prophet. Ghulam Ahmad stated:
{{Quotation|The best way to determine whether Dowie's God is true or ours, is that Mr. Dowie should stop making prophecies about the destruction of all Muslims. Instead he should keep me alone in his mind and pray that if one of us is fabricating a lie, he should die before the other.|Ghulam Ahmad|<ref name="history_30">{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/30.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam: Death of Dr. Dowie |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>}}

Dowie declined the challenge,<ref>S.R. Valentine, Islam and Ahmadiyya Jama'at, Foundation Books, 2008, p. 50</ref> calling Mirza Ghulam Ahmad the "silly Mohammedan Messiah".{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}Ghulam Ahmad prophesied:
{{Quotation|Though he may try hard as he can to fly from death which awaits him, yet his flight from such a contest will be nothing less than death to him; and calamity will certainly overtake his Zion, for he must bear the consequences either of the acceptance of the challenge or its refusal. He will depart this life with great sorrow and torment during my lifetime.}}{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}

The challenge of "prayer duel" was made by Mirza in September 1902. The ''Dictionary of American Biography'' states that after having been deposed during a revolt in which his own family was involved, Dowie endeavoured to recover his authority via the law courts without success and that he may have been a victim of some form of mania, as he suffered from hallucinations during his last illness.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://gutenberg.net.au/dictbiog/0-dict-biogD.html#dowie1 |title=Dictionary of Australian Biography: John Alexander Dowie |publisher=Gutenberg.net.au |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Dowie died before Mirza, in March 1907.


===Encounter with the Agapemonites=== ===Encounter with the Agapemonites===
In September 1902, a man by the name of Rev. John Hugh Smyth-Pigott proclaimed himself the Messiah and also claimed to be God while preaching in the Church of the Ark of the Covenant in Clapton, London. This church was originally built by the ], a religious movement founded by the Anglican priest ].<ref name="claptonpond"></ref> In September 1902 the Rev. ] (1852-1927) proclaimed himself the Messiah and also claimed to be God while preaching in the Church known as "The Ark of the Covenant" in ] in London. This church was originally built by the ], a religious movement founded by the Anglican priest ].<ref name="claptonpond">{{Cite web|url=http://claptonpond.ground-level.org/messiah|title=Clapton Pond Neighbourhood Action Group: The Clapton Messiah|date=22 July 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030722112805/http://claptonpond.ground-level.org/messiah |archive-date=22 July 2003 }}</ref> Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote to Smyth-Pigott, informing him that such a blasphemous proposition did not behove man, and that in the future he should abstain from making such claims, or he would be destroyed. This message was sent in November 1902. Newspapers in America and Europe published Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's notification.{{cn|date=May 2022}} Despite this prophecy, Smyth-Piggot continued to claim divinity both before and after Mirza Ghulam's death in 1908, as reported by various contemporary newspapers at the time.<ref>{{cite web | title=Auckland Star, 1905 | url=https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=The Cambrian, Friday, August 18 1905 | url=https://newspapers.library.wales/view/3347828/3347836}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Wairarapa Age, 1909 | newspaper=Wairarapa Age| date=9 March 1909| page=5| url=https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Nottingham Evening Post, March 1927 | url = http://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400}}</ref>

When the news of his claim reached India, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, a disciple of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, was informed of it and wrote to Pigott informing him of the claim of Ahmad and requesting more information about his own claim. Pigott did not reply directly, but a letter was received from his secretary along with two advertisements, one carrying the title "The Ark of Noah". When the advertisements and letter were read out in the presence of Ahmad, he replied:
{{Quotation |Logic is respected and lasts but irrational thought loses its innovativeness in the space of a few lines. Now our Noah's Ark will overpower the false one. The Europeans used to say that false Messiahs are about to come, so first these false prophets and Messiahs stepped out in London. After this the voice of the true Messiah will reach London. It is also recorded in the Ahadith that the Anti-Christ will claim Godhead and Prophethood for himself, so this Nation has also fulfilled this manifestly. Dowie is claiming to be a Prophet in America and Pigott is claiming to be God in London and calls himself God.|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|'']'', Vol.4, 11 November 1902}}

After having prayed about Pigott, Ahmad claimed to have seen in a dream "some books on which was written three times: Holy, Holy, Holy" followed by a revelation:
{{Quotation|Allah is severe in retribution. They are not acting righteously.|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|''Tazkirah'', pg. 531}}

Ahmad issued an advertisement forewarning Pigott of the "Punishment that awaits him" if he did not repent of his irreverent claim, which is said to have been widely publicised in English newspapers. It is said that thenceforth, Pigott became silent and did not repeat his claim. He left London and retreated to a small village in ], changed his name, seeking a life of anonymity, and was ] by the ] Church following the birth of three sons from one of his many spiritual brides. He eventually died in March 1927.<ref name="claptonpond" />

===The White Minaret===
{{Main|White Minaret}}

] at Qadian]]
According to Islamic tradition, ], upon his second advent, would descend with or near a White Minaret disputably to the east of ] or in the eastern side of Damascus.<ref> (Book Pertaining to the Turmoil and Portents of the Last Hour)</ref> Ghulam Ahmad argued that this Hadith does not explain whether the minaret will be within the eastern side of Damascus or to the eastern side of the city. According to him, this prophecy was fulfilled with his advent in ], a town situated to the east of Damascus, and the significance of the minaret symbolic. The minaret, according to him, symbolised the spread of the "light of Islam", its message reaching far and wide, and the "supremacy of Islam", which was to tower up as it were like a minaret in the time of the promised one. The prophecy is also believed to be pointing to an age of enlightenment and one where there are numerous facilities for communication and transport, thereby making conveyance and proselytising easier. This was reflective of the physical purpose that minarets were used in medieval Islamic societies, the efficient communication of the call to prayer to a wider audience in the locality.<ref>, by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad</ref> Ghulam Ahmad claimed that God had revealed to him:

{{Quotation|Step forth, that your time has Arrived and the feet of the people of Muhammad have been firmly planted on a high tower. Holy Muhammad, the chosen one, Chief of the Prophets.|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|''Tadhkirah'', pg. 444}}

In 1903, Ahmad laid the foundation of a minaret to commemorate the prophecy. This, according to him, will represent the physical as well as spiritual aspects of Islam with a light and a clock fixed on its top symbolising the "light of Islam" spreading far and wide and "so man will recognize his time", and a ] to give the call to prayer five times a day symbolising an invitation to Islam. The construction of this minaret was completed in 1916 and has since become a symbol and distinctive mark in ].

===Heavenly Graveyard===
{{See also|Bahishti Maqbara}}
Ahmad mentioned the establishment of a "Heavenly Graveyard" (Bahishti Maqbara)<ref>{{cite book | title=The Will | author=Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam | pages=22–23}}</ref> under divine commandment in his booklet ''Al-Wasiyyat (The Will)''. It is stated that in a spiritual vision, Ahmad was shown a plot of land called "Bahishti Maqbara", containing the graves of such members of his community who are destined to be in heaven. In order to fulfill this vision, Ahmad donated a parcel of his land in Qadian for those members of the community who fulfilled certain conditions:<ref name="cemetery">{{cite web | url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/28.html | title=Celestial Cemetery | accessdate=25 January 2011 | publisher=Al Islam}}</ref>
* Whoever desires to be buried in this graveyard should contribute towards the expenses of its maintenance according to his capacity.
* Whoever desires to be buried therein should make a testamentary disposition that one tenth of his property shall, under direction of the Movement, be devoted to the propagation of Islam, and carrying out the teachings of the Quran. It will be open to every righteous person whose faith is perfect to provide for this purpose in his will more than one tenth, but it shall not be less.
* Whoever shall lead a righteous life and abstain from all that is prohibited and shall not do anything that amounts to association of something with God or to innovation in the faith. He should be a true and sincere Muslim. (''Al-Wasiyyat'', pp.&nbsp;16–19)

Over time, the cemetery in ] has expanded, while another one was established in ], Pakistan, after the ]. Established under the direction ], the second ] of the ], the cemetery in Rabwah has over 10,000 graves.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.cerebrosystemsolutions.com/ | title=Rabwah: Introduction & Brief History | accessdate=6 March 2011}}</ref>


===Last journey=== ===Last journey===
Towards the end of 1907 and early 1908, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to have received numerous revelations informing him of his imminent death. In April 1908, he travelled to Lahore with his family and companions. Here, he gave many lectures. A banquet was arranged for dignitaries where Ghulam Ahmad, upon request, spoke for some two hours explaining his claims, teachings and speaking in refutation of objections raised against his person; here, he preached reconciliation between Hindus and Muslims. He completed writing his last work, entitled ''Message of Peace'',<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Message-of-Peace.pdf |title=A Message of Reconciliation |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> a day before his death.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/31.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – His Last Journey |publisher=Alislam.org |date=1908-04-27 |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Towards the end of 1907 and early 1908, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to have received numerous revelations informing him of his imminent death. In April 1908, he travelled to Lahore with his family and companions. Here, he gave many lectures. A banquet was arranged for dignitaries where Ahmad, upon request, spoke for some two hours explaining his claims, teachings and speaking in refutation of objections raised against his person; here, he preached reconciliation between Hindus and Muslims. He completed writing his last work, entitled ''Message of Peace'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Message-of-Peace.pdf |title=A Message of Reconciliation |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref> a day before his death.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/31.html |title=A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – His Last Journey |publisher=Alislam.org |date=27 April 1908 |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref>


===Death=== ===Death===
Ahmad was in Lahore at the home of Dr. Syed Muhammad Hussain (who was also his physician), when, on 26 May 1908, he died from dysentery.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/links/00000082.html |title=Re-Institution of Khilafat |publisher=Alislam.org |access-date=20 May 2013}}</ref> His body was subsequently taken to Qadian and buried there;<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Spiritual Challenge – Mubahala with Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari |url=https://www.alislam.org/ahmadiyya-history/spiritual-challenge-mubahala-maulvi-sanaullah-amritsari/ |access-date=2023-12-19 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/27.html |title=His Last Testament |access-date=25 January 2011 |publisher=Al Islam}}</ref> he had previously claimed that an ] had told him that he would be buried there.<ref>{{cite book |author=Valentine |first=Simon Ross |title=Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jamaʻat: History, Belief, Practice |pages=41}}</ref> By the time of his death, he had gathered an estimated 400,000 followers, especially within the ], the Punjab and ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Valentine |first=Simon Ross |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q78O1mjX2tMC&q=islamic+reform |title=Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jamaʻat: History, Belief, Practice |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-231-70094-8 |page=53}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=H.H. Risley and E.A. Gait, (1903), Report of the Census of India, 1901, Calcutta, Superintendent of Government Printing, p. 373. |url=http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/page.php?title=&record=1512 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205180023/http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/page.php?title=&record=1512 |archive-date=5 February 2012 |publisher=Chinese Heritage of the Australian Federation Project}}</ref>
{{Main|Controversy surrounding the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad}}
While he was in Lahore at the home of Dr. Syed Muhammad Hussain (who was also his physician), Mirza Ghulam Ahmad fell ill from excessive weakness and died.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/links/00000082.html |title=Re-Institution of Khilafat |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> His body was subsequently taken to Qadian and buried there.<ref>, (pp. 47–50) by Maulana Hafiz Sher Muhammad Sahib</ref><ref>, alislam.org</ref> A few years before his death, Ahmad claimed to have received several prophecies relating to his upcoming death.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.alislam.org/library/history/ahmadiyya/27.html | title=His Last Testament |accessdate=25 January 2011 | publisher=Al Islam}}</ref>


==Marriages and children== ==Marriages and children==
] ]


Mirza Ghulam Ahmad married twice. His first wife was his paternal cousin Hurmat Bibi. Later, they separated and lived separately for a long time. At the time of his second marriage, Hurmat Bibi gave him the permission to live with the second wife and decided against a divorce. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad married twice. His first wife was his maternal cousin Hurmat Bibi.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Dard |first1=A. R. |title=Life of Ahmad |url=https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad.pdf |access-date=2 October 2022 |website=Al-Islam |publisher=Islam International Publications Ltd. |page=38}}</ref> Later, they separated and lived separately for a long time.


===Children=== ===Children===
With his first wife, Hurmat Bibi, he had two sons: With his first wife, Hurmat Bibi, he had two sons:
#Mirza Sultan Ahmad (1853 – 2 July 1931)
#Mirza Fazal Ahmad (1855 – 1904)


With his second wife, ], he had ten children, five of whom died in infancy:
# Mirza Sultan Ahmad (1853–1931) ( Became Ahmadi)
# Mirza Fazal Ahmad (1855–1904) (died young)


#Ismat (15 April 1886 – July 1891)
With his second wife, Nusrat Jehan Begum, he had ten children:
#Bashir (7 August 1887 – 4 November 1888)

#] (12 January 1889 – 8 November 1965)
Five children died young:
#Shaukat (1891 – 1892)

#] (20 April 1893 – 2 September 1963)
# Ismat (1886–1891)
#Mirza Sharif Ahmad (24 May 1895 – 26 December 1961)
# Bashir (1887–1888)
#(Nawab) Mubarika Begum (2 March 1897 – 23 May 1977)
# Shaukat (1891–1892)
#Mubarik (14 June 1899 – 16 September 1907)
# Mirza Mubarik Ahmad (1899–1907)
# Amtul Naseer (1903–1903) #Amtul Naseer (28 January 1903 – 3 December 1903)
#(Nawab) Amtul Hafeez Begum (25 June 1904 – 6 May 1987)

Five children lived longer:

# ] (1889–1965)
# Mirza Bashir Ahmad (1893–1963)
# Mirza Sharif Ahmad (1895–1961)
# (Nawab) Mubarika Begum (1897–1977)
# (Nawab) Sahiba Amtul Hafeez Begum (1904–1987)


==Legacy== ==Legacy==
{{Main|Ahmadiyya}}
{{See also|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad bibliography}}
{{See also|Ahmadiyya Caliphate|Persecution of Ahmadis}}
Although Mirza Ghulam Ahmad aroused much opposition particularly from Muslim leaders owing to his messianic claims, opinion of him was not entirely negative.{{Sfn|Khan|2015|p=6}}<ref>Brannon Ingram, 'Ahmadi Muslim Americans' in E. E. Curtis. Infobase Publishing, 2010, p. 32.</ref> Many leading Muslim scholars, theologians and prominent journalists who were his contemporaries or had come into contact with him, had, despite differing with him in matters of belief, praised his personal character and acclaimed his works in the cause of Islam and the manner of his argumentation against proclaimants of other religions.<ref>{{cite web |title=Tributes to Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|url=http://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s20.htm|access-date=2 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Majestic Writings of the Promised Messiah in View of Some Renowned Muslim Scholars |url=https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Majestic-Writings-of-Promised-Messiah.pdf |access-date=2 April 2016 |publisher=Al-Islam}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Immaculate Character of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad |url=http://kashifmd.com/2015/01/13/the-immaculate-character-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-as/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160514063234/http://kashifmd.com/2015/01/13/the-immaculate-character-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-as/ |archive-date=14 May 2016 |access-date=1 May 2016}}</ref> The teachings that Jesus survived crucifixion, migrating towards the east in search of the Israelite tribes that had settled there and that he ] upon earth, as propounded by Ahmad, have been a source of ongoing friction with the Christian church since they challenge the core beliefs of Christianity and would nullify the doctrines of ] and ], the two principal tenets of Christianity. Western scholars and historians have acknowledged this fact as one of the features of Ahmad's legacy.<ref>Francis Robinson. Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 411. "At their most extreme religious strategies for dealing with the Christian presence might involve attacking Christian revelation at its heart, as did the Punjabi Muslim, Ghulam Ahmad (d. 1908), who founded the Ahmadiyya missionary sect. He claimed that he was the messiah of the Jewish and Muslim tradition; the figure known as Jesus of Nazareth had not died on the cross but survived to die in Kashmir."</ref><ref>Yohanan Friedmann. Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 114. "He realized the centrality of the crucifixion and of the doctrine of vicarious atonement in the Christian dogma, and understood that his attack on these two was an attack on the innermost core of Christianity."</ref><ref>]. Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 208. "Ghulam Ahmad denied the historicity of Jesus' crucifixion and claimed that Jesus had fled to India where he died a natural death in Kashmir. In this way, he sought to neutralize Christian soteriologies of Christ and to demonstrate the superior rationality of Islam."</ref>


Ahmad was the first to propose a ''post-crucifixion'' journey to India for Jesus and the first—other than the local people{{Sfn|Khan|2015|p=47}}—to identify the ] shrine in Kashmir as the tomb of Jesus. These ideas have been further expanded upon since his death in light of subsequent findings, both by Ahmadis and individuals independent of the Ahmadiyya movement.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.alislam.org/jesus/|title=Jesus – A Humble Prophet of God}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.reviewofreligions.org/date/2015/05/|title=May 2015|website=The Review of Religions}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.alislam.org/sunrise/sunrise2003-4.pdf |title=Jesus in India: A Review of the World Literature (1899-1999) |journal=The Muslim Sunrise |author1=Tahir Ijaz |author2=Qamar Ijaz |name-list-style=amp |year=2003 |issue=4}}</ref> However, the views remain controversial having been dismissed by some while being supported by others. ] research tends to corroborate a link between the tribes of Israel and the peoples of south/central Asia, specifically the ] of ] and the ] – as suggested by Ahmad in his book ] (and by others) – while findings from genetic evidence seem to remain equivocal.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jan/17/israel-lost-tribes-pashtun|title=Pashtun clue to lost tribes of Israel|first1=Rory|last1=McCarthy|last2=Jerusalem|newspaper=The Observer |date=16 January 2010|via=The Guardian}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://css.ethz.ch/en/services.html|title=Resources|website=css.ethz.ch|date=20 June 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.reviewofreligions.org/6107/the-lost-tribes-of-israel-in-india-a-genetic-perspective/|title=The Lost Tribes of Israel in India – A Genetic Perspective |publisher=] (CAL)|date=March 2012|access-date=1 December 2014}}</ref> Jesus' survival of crucifixion and his natural death have become an important element of Ahmadi belief and Ahmadis have published extensively on this topic.
One of the main sources of dispute during his lifetime and continuing since then is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's use of the terms '']'' ("prophet") and '']'' ("messenger") when referring to himself. Muslims consider the prophet ] to be the last of the prophets<ref>, Islam 101</ref> and believe that Ahmad's use of these terms is a violation of not only the rudimentary concept of the ], but the Qur'an itself.<ref>“”, Exploring World Religions, 2001, Oxford University Press Canada</ref> His followers fall into two camps in this regards. The ] believe in a literal interpretation of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's prophethood (with some qualifications)<ref>, The Promised Messiah and Mahdi, by Dr. Aziz Ahmad Chaudhry, Islam International Publications Limited</ref> and is currently headed by Ahmad's fifth Caliph, or successor, carrying the title of ], an institution believed to have been established soon after Ahmad's death. The ] believe in an allegorical interpretation of these two terms and is administered by a body of people called the ''Anjuman Ishat-e-Islam'' ("movement for the propagation of Islam"), headed by an ].<ref>, Accusations Answered, The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement</ref> This, among other reasons, caused a split in the movement soon after Ahmad's death.


A number of modern Muslim scholars and Muslim intellectuals seem to conform to the idea of Jihad as fundamentally a peaceful religious endeavour rather than ''chiefly'' (or unconditionally) a militaristic struggle, in accordance with Ahmad's standpoint on the issue. Furthermore, some Islamic scholars have opined that Jesus has died (Ahmad's assertion) or have expressed their own confusion on this matter,<ref>{{cite book|last=Leirvik|first=Oddbjørn|title=Images of Jesus Christ in Islam: 2nd Edition|year=2010|publisher=Continuum|isbn=978-1-4411-7739-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gzd_I2AFswwC|pages=146–8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Zahniser|first=A. H. Mathias|title=The Mission and Death of Jesus in Islam and Christianity|year=2008|publisher= Orbis Books|isbn=978-1-57075-807-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PvzXAAAAMAAJ|pages=61–2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Ayoub|first1=Mahmoud|last2=Omar|first2=Irfan A.|title=Muslim View Of Christianity: Essays on Dialogue by Mahmoud Ayoub|year=2010|publisher= Logos Press|isbn=978-81-7268-197-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UmRvZOOc5hEC|pages=172–3}}</ref><ref>, Joseph L. Cumming Yale University. May 2001, pp. 26–30.</ref><ref>" {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930165205/http://www.renaissance.com.pk/septitl2y4.html |date=30 September 2007 }}", ], 14(9), September 2004.</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Islahi |first=Amin |title=Tadabbur-i-Qur'an |title-link=Tadabbur-i-Qur'an |publisher=Faran Foundation |edition=1st |location=] |oclc=60341215 |author-link=Amin Ahsan Islahi}} Vol. 2, p. 243.</ref> though the majority orthodox position of most Muslims with regard to this issue has not changed.
Followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad are considered non-Muslims in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and have faced relentless persecution of various types over the years.<ref>, Amnesty International, Public Statement, AI Index: ASA 33/028/2005 (Public), News Service No: 271; 11 October 2005</ref> In 1974, the ] amended the Pakistani constitution to declare Ahmadis as non-Muslims for purposes of the constitution of the Islamic Republic.<ref>, Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, Part I, 21 September 1974</ref> In 1984, a series of changes in the Pakistan Penal Code sections relating to blasphemy were made, which, in essence, made it illegal for Ahmadis to preach their creed, leading to arrests and prosecutions.


One of the main sources of dispute during his lifetime and continuing since then is Ahmad's use of the terms '']'' ("prophet") and ''rasul'' ("messenger") when referring to himself.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Holy Prophet: The Messenger of Allah and the Seal of Prophets |url=http://www.alislam.org/holyprophet/ |access-date=20 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Ahmadiyya Muslim Understanding of Finality of Prophethood |url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/With-Love-to-Muhammad.pdf |access-date=20 September 2015}}</ref>{{Sfn|Friedmann|2003|p=132}}<ref>{{Cite news |date=28 May 2010 |title=Who are the Ahmadi? |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8711026.stm |via=news.bbc.co.uk}}</ref> Most non-Ahmadi Muslims consider ] to be the last of the prophets<ref>{{Cite web |title=Five Pillars of Islam |url=http://www.islam101.com/dawah/pillars.html |access-date=2023-12-19 |website=www.islam101.com}}</ref> and believe that Ahmad's use of these terms is a violation of the concept of the ].<ref>"", Exploring World Religions, 2001, Oxford University Press Canada.</ref> His followers fall into two factions in this regard. The ], which comprises by far the majority of Ahmadis, believes that Ahmad's prophetic status does not in any way infringe the finality of Muhammad's prophethood – to which it is wholly subservient and from which it is inseparable – and is in accordance with scriptural prophecies concerning the advent of the Messiah in Islam.<ref name="Ahmadiyya Muslim Community">{{cite web |url=http://www.alislam.org/books/truth/finality.html|title=Finality of Prophethood - Hadhrat Muhammad (PUBH) the Last Prophet|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>, The Promised Messiah and Mahdi, by Dr. Aziz Ahmad Chaudhry, Islam International Publications Limited.</ref> This group is currently headed by Ahmad's fifth caliph, or successor, carrying the title of ], an institution believed to have been established soon after his death. The ], which comprises a small fraction of all Ahmadis and believes in an allegorical understanding of these terms with reference to Ahmad, formed in 1914 when a number of prominent Ahmadis seceded from the main body soon after the election of ] as the second caliph. This group is administered by a body of people called the ''Anjuman Ishaat-e-Islam'' ("Movement for the Propagation of Islam"), headed by an ].{{Sfn|Friedmann|2003|pp=147–153}}<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MdRth02Q6nAC&q=split&pg=PA250 | title=Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jama'at: History, Belief, Practice | author=Simon Ross Valentine | publisher=Columbia University Press | pages=56–7 | access-date=25 August 2014| isbn=9781850659167 | year=2008 }}</ref>
In 2007, the Ahmadiyya were banned from practising their faith openly in the state of ] and given a similar status to other banned religious groups in the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=175 |title=Belarus: Ahmadiyya Muslims among banned religious organisations |publisher=Forum18.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>


The movement initiated by Ahmad,<ref name="Upal 2021" /><ref name="Korbel-Preckel 2016" /> which is often seen to have emerged as an Islamic religious response to the Christian and ] missionary activity widespread in 19th-century India, and is viewed by its adherents as embodying the promised latter day revival of Islam, has since grown in organisational strength and in its own missionary programme under the leadership of its caliphate. Although it has expanded to over 200 countries and territories of the world, numbering an estimated 10 to 20 million,<ref name=":0">{{cite web |url = http://www.adherents.com/adh_branches.html|title = Major Branches of Religions|date = 28 October 2005|access-date = 19 April 2015|publisher = Adherents.com|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150315022054/http://www.adherents.com/adh_branches.html|archive-date = 15 March 2015|url-status = usurped}}</ref><ref name="ahmadi">See:
Relative to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, some mainstream Muslim opinion towards the Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement has been more accepting,<ref name="muslimopn">, AAIIL Website</ref> with the Lahore Ahmadiyya literature finding easier compatibility with Orthodox Muslims<ref>, AAIIL USA</ref><ref>, AAIIL USA</ref> and some Orthodox Muslim scholars considering the members of the Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement as Muslims.<ref name="muslimopn"/>


* {{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yi8ONIe1fv4C&pg=PA8 |title=Breach of Faith |date=June 2005 |publisher=Human Rights Watch |page=8 |quote=Estimates of around 20 million would be appropriate. |access-date=29 March 2014}}
A number of modern Muslim scholars and Muslim intellectuals seem to conform to the idea of peaceful Jihad as a struggle for reform through civil means, in accordance with Mirza Ghulam Ahmed's standpoint on the issue. Furthermore, some Islamic scholars have opined that Jesus has died (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's assertion) or expressed their own confusion on this matter,<ref>, Joseph L. Cumming Yale University. May 2001, pp 26–30</ref><ref>“”, ], 14(9), September 2004.</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Islahi | first = Amin | authorlink = Amin Ahsan Islahi | title = ] | publisher = Faran Foundation | location = ] | edition = 1st | oclc = 60341215 }} vol.2, p.243</ref> though the majority orthodox position of most Muslims with regard to this issue has not changed.
* {{cite book |author1=Larry DeVries |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dgtgGhMUgIUC&pg=PA72 |title=Asian Religions in British Columbia |author2=Don Baker |author3=Dan Overmyer |date=January 2011 |publisher=University of Columbia Press |isbn=978-0-7748-1662-5 |quote=The community currently numbers around 15 million spread around the world. |access-date=29 March 2014 |name-list-style=amp}}
* {{cite book |author=Juan Eduardo Campo |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZbyz_Hr-eIC&pg=PA23 |title=Encyclopedia of Islam |publisher=Infobase |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8160-5454-1 |page=24 |quote=The total size of the Ahmadiyya community in 2001 was estimated to be more than 10 million. |access-date=29 March 2014}}
* {{cite web |date=20 January 2012 |title=Ahmadiyya Muslims |url=https://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/2012/01/20/january-20-2012-ahmadiyya-muslims/10124/ |access-date=6 October 2013 |publisher=pbs.org}}</ref> it has received a largely negative (often hostile) response from mainstream Muslims who view Ahmad as a false messiah and his teachings as heretical, particularly the teaching that he was a prophet.{{sfn|Friedmann|2003|p=132}}


] is the only state that specifically requires every Pakistani Muslim to denigrate Ahmad as an impostor and his followers as non-Muslims when applying for a passport or a national ID card.<ref>{{cite book |author=Jocelyne Cesari |title=The Awakening of Muslim Democracy |date=2014 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=thgmAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA41 |location=New York |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=41 |isbn=978-1-107-04418-0 |quote=When applying for a passport, every Pakistani Muslim must sign a statement deriding Ahmad and denouncing his followers as non-Muslims.}}</ref><ref name="hanif">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/8744092.stm|title= Why Pakistan's Ahmadi community is officially detested |date= 16 June 2010|work=BBC News|first=Mohammed|last=Hanif|author-link=Mohammed Hanif}}</ref>
Different scholars had different views on him.
* Maulvi Muhammad Hussein of ] who was a significant leader of ] sect. He was one of his key opponents and his fellow from youth on the writing of ] that in his journal.<ref>{{cite web|title=Maulvi praised him|url=http://www.alislam.org/urdu/pocket/APB9.pdf|publisher=Al Islam|accessdate=18 November 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=Mirza Basheer-ud-din Mahmood Ahmad|title=Hadhrat Ahmad|year=1967|publisher=Islam International Publications|location=Athens, Ohio|isbn=188249113|page=62|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Hadhrat-Ahmad-20080514MN.pdf}}</ref>
{{Quotation|The writer of this book from the practical and theoretical observation of followers and enemies is religiously on the path of ] of ] and is verily truthful.}}
* Maulvi Sirajuddin, who is father of ] in his newspaper '']'' on the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote.<ref>{{cite web|title=An Eye Witness of Piety and Saint|url=http://www.alislam.org/urdu/pocket/APB9.pdf|publisher=Al Islam|accessdate=18 November 2011}}</ref>
{{Quotation|Mirza Ghulam Ahmad(1860–1861) had lived in ]. He will be of age 22 and 23. We are an ] to say that he was pious and saint in his youth.}}
* Molvi ] Naqshbandi had his praised contributions for Islam and against Christians.<ref>{{cite web|title=Praise of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LRW-ooATLg|publisher=Rah-e-Huda|accessdate=18 November 2011}}</ref>


==Criticism== ==See also==
{{columns-list|
{{Multiple issues|section=y|weasel=September 2010|original research=September 2010| synthesis=September 2010}}
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
}}


==Notes==
Due to the nature of his claims and teachings, he had been a subject of criticism throughout his life and has been ever since his death. He and his movement are still regarded by most Muslim scholars as ] (unbelievers) and as guilty for an attempted schism in Islam.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://islamqa.com/en/ref/4060/ |title=Qadianiyyah in the light of Islam – IslamQA |publisher=Islamqa.com |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>
{{Notelist}}


==References==
Ahmadis believe that Mirza Ghulahm Ahmad's writings are taken completely out of context by critics. For example, critics may show parts of writing that support their view, but fail to show the parts of writing that contradict their view.
{{Reflist}}


== Bibliography ==
===Relationship with the British===
Many Muslims feel that Ghulam Ahmad was aided in his mission by the British government, whose stated policy of "]" was expressed in their approval of Ahmad's introducing a dissident faction within Islam.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/books/truth/british.html|title=Ahmadiyya and the British|publisher=Alislam|accessdate=13 September 2010}}</ref> Ghulam Ahmad is criticised by the orthodox Muslims for his support of the ] in India and maintain that he and his associates went on publishing in favour of British control and even tried to convince Muslims in other Muslim countries that a British government would be in their favour. It is alleged that he had collaborated with the British against Muslims.<ref>, ''khatm-e-nubuwwat.org''</ref> They give reference to one of his books in which he said:


* {{Cite book |last=Friedmann |first=Yohanan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rv8EAAAACAAJ&q=Prophecy+Continuous |title=Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and Its Medieval Background |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 |isbn=0-19-566252-0 |editor-last= |editor-first= |place=Oxford |author-link=}}
{{Quotation| The service that has been rendered on my part, in favour of the English government is that I have published fifty thousand books, magazines and posters and distributed them in this and other Islamic countries It is as a result of my endeavors that thousands of people have given up thoughts of Jihad which had been propounded by ill-witted mullahs and embedded in the minds of the people. I can rightly feel proud of this that no other Muslim in British India can equal me in this respect |<ref name="cons">, ''Sitara-e-Qaisaria, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 15, P. 114, Sitara-e-Qaisaria, P. 3-4 Letter to Queen Victoria, Khutba-Ilhamia, Appendix. . For detailed excerpts from Mirza Ghulams’s writings about this affair in Urdu see , khatm-e-nubuwwat.org''</ref>}}
* {{Cite book |last=Khan |first=Adil Hussain |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C2DxBwAAQBAJ |title=From Sufism to Ahmadiyya: A Muslim Minority Movement in South Asia |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-253-01529-7 |editor-last= |editor-first= |place=Bloomington |author-link=}}
*''The Essence of Islam'', Islam International Publications, Ltd.; 2nd edition (2004), {{ISBN|1-85372-765-2}}
*Iain Adamson: ''Ahmad, The Guided One'', Islam International Publications, 1990, revised 1991.
*''Jesus in India'', Ahmadiyya Muslim Foreign Mission Department, 1978, {{ISBN|978-1-85372-723-8}}; Original ''Masih Hindustan Mein'', Oriental & Religious Publications Ltd., Rabwah ()
*{{cite book |last1=Korbel |first1=Jonathan |last2=Preckel |first2=Claudia |year=2016 |chapter=Ghulām Aḥmad al-Qādiyānī: The Messiah of the Christians—Peace upon Him—in India (India, 1908) |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZtY6DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA426 |editor1-last=Bentlage |editor1-first=Björn |editor2-last=Eggert |editor2-first=Marion |editor3-last=Krämer |editor3-first=Hans-Martin |editor4-last=Reichmuth |editor4-first=Stefan |editor4-link=Stefan Reichmuth (academic) |title=Religious Dynamics under the Impact of Imperialism and Colonialism |series=Numen Book Series |volume=154 |location=] |publisher=] |pages=426–442 |doi=10.1163/9789004329003_034 |isbn=978-90-04-32511-1 |access-date=10 November 2020}}
*S. R. Valentine, 'Islam & the Ahmadiyya Jama'at', Hurst & Co, London/New York, 2008


==External links==
His followers reject this criticism and point out that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was constantly engaged in controversies with the British missionaries. Western historians have recorded this effort as one of the features of Ahmad's legacy.<ref>, Francis Robinson, Page 21</ref> Francis Robinson states:
*{{Commons category-inline}}
{{Quotation|At their most extreme religious strategies for dealing with the Christian presence might involve attacking Christian revelation at its heart, as did the Punjabi Muslim, Ghulam Ahmad (d. 1908), who founded the Ahmadiyya missionary sect.}}
*{{Wikiquote-inline}}
His followers also say that Ahmad openly supported the British government in India, and therefore, his critics' consideration of this being tantamount to "conspiring" with the British is baseless.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/library/books/WasAhmadiyyaJamaatPlantedByBritish.pdf |title=Was Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Planted By the British? |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> They further argue that his open support for the British was on account of the religious freedom the British extended to the Muslims, as opposed to the preceding Sikh rule in Punjab wherein Muslims were persecuted and their religious freedom curtailed,<ref> by Maulana Muhammad Ali, Chapter 1: The First Forty Years.</ref> and that one of the reasons for his expression of loyalty towards the British was due to him being repeatedly presented as a threat and danger to the government with rebellious intent by his opponents such as Maulvi Muhammad Hussein, who warned the government in the following words:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/books/truth/british.html |title=Ahmadiyyat and the British |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>

{{Quotation|His deception is proved by the fact that in his heart he considers it lawful to put an end to the authority of a non-Muslim government and to plunder its belongings Therefore, it would not be proper on the part of the Government to rely on him and it would be necessary to be aware of him, otherwise such harm might be suffered at the hands of this Mahdi of Qadian as was experienced at the hands of the Sudanese Mahdi.|''Ishaatus Sunnah'', Vol. VI, 1893}}

It is also pointed out by them that some prominent mainstream Muslim leaders of the time had also openly expressed similar sentiments for the British rule for the same reasons.<ref> – Section: 'British Government in the Eyes of Ahl-e-Hadith', pp. 38–40</ref> Such leaders included ], Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, Deputy Nazir Ahmad and members of Anjuman Himayat-i-Islam.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ahmadiyya.org/allegs/oviews.htm |title=Indian Muslim Leaders Relationship with British Rulers |publisher=Ahmadiyya.org |date=1970-10-02 |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> Furthermore, the famous founders of the Muslim League had also expressed similar sentiments of loyalty to the British Government at around the same time as Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ahmadiyya.org/allegs/mleague.htm |title=Muslim League and the British Government |publisher=Ahmadiyya.org |date=1906-12-30 |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref> In summary, the followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad contend that his views towards the British rulers at the time were the same as those of numerous other well-regarded Muslim leaders of the same time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ahmadiyya.org/allegs/intro.htm |title=Ahmadiyya Reply to Allegations of being Sponsored by the British |publisher=Ahmadiyya.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-20}}</ref>

===Termination of Jihad===
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's critics{{who|date=September 2010}} allege that he had terminated ], which is an important Islamic requirement, to appease the ]. His followers,{{who|date=September 2010}} however, argue that he never terminated Jihad, in the broader sense of the word, but only forbade using Jihad as a pretext to fight against a government that gives freedom of religion. An official British government report of 1901 states:

{{Quotation|It is also interesting to notice that there is at the present time in Northern India a religious teacher of the name of Ghulam Ahmed who claims to be the Mahdi or Messiah expected by Muhammadans and Christians alike, and has obtained a considerable number of followers in the United Provinces, the Punjab and Sind. He »repudiates the doctrine of Jihád with the sword«, and regards as absolutely unlawful wars undertaken for the propagation of religion.|''Report on the Census of India'', 1901, page 373<ref>{{dead link|date=May 2013}}</ref>}}

Ahmad wrote:
{{Quotation|Behold! I have come to you people with a directive that henceforth jihad with the sword has come to an end but jihad for the purification of your souls still remains. This injunction is not from me but rather it is the will of God.|''British Government and Jihad'', pg. 15<ref>, by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib of Qadian</ref>}}

According to Ahmad this age did not require defending Islam by the sword but that the Jihad of this age was to be carried out by preaching and defending Islam by speech and by the pen. In another place he writes:

{{Quotation|The Jihad of this age is to strive in upholding the word of Islam, to refute the objections of the opponents, to propagate the excellences of the Islamic faith, and to proclaim the truth of the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, throughout the world. This is Jihad till God Almighty brings about other conditions in the world.|<ref>Ahmadiyya Muslim Community: </ref>}}

===Plagiarism===
Ghulam Ahmad has been accused{{by whom|date=September 2010}} of plagiarising, and altering the words of Arab linguists to appear as his own. He claimed that his book ''Hujjatullah'' was of superior Arabic. However, his critics allege that several sentences and paragraphs in this text are taken directly without alteration, from ''Maqamat al-Hariri'', the best known poetry collection of the Arabic scholar and poet ].{{Citation needed|date=December 2010}} For this reason, his claim to divine instruction in Arabic is not accepted in Islamic Orthodoxy.{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}} Ahmadis, however, claim{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} that the alleged instances of plagiarism are not true because Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had deliberately inserted the writings of Al-Hariri with his own and then openly declared that he had done as such as a challenge to his critics to compare and separate the two. His followers claim that as clearly stated by him in the beginning of his book ''Hujjatullah''<ref>Roohani Khazain, Volume 12, pg.144–145</ref> it was only after his use of Arabic was labelled inadequate, ungrammatical and 'unchaste' by his opponents that Ghulam Ahmad deliberately amalgamated his own writings with that of Al-Hariri's in order to expose his adversaries; whom he called upon to distinguish between his writings and that of Al-Hariri’s. Ghulam Ahmad stated:
{{Quotation| Thus the method which will free the people from his deception is that we present to him paragraphs from our writing and some other paragraphs from the writings of a great Arab writer while concealing the names of the authors, and then call upon him to tell us which paragraph out of this is ours and which is theirs, if you are truthful. Then if he recognises my sayings and theirs and distinguishes between them as between a shell and its kernel, then we shall give him fifty rupees as a reward. |''Hujjatulla'', pg. 4–5 }}

===Disrespect of Jesus===
Some critics of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claim that he abused Jesus Christ, an accusation denied by his followers who deem the allegation to be baseless and without foundation.

{{quote|"The family of Jesus was perfectly holy and immaculate. Jesus' three paternal and maternal grandmothers were fornicators and prostitutes, from whose blood the body of Jesus came into existence. May be it was a condition for divinity. His inclination for prostitutes and interaction with them might also be due to this ancestral relationship".
—Anjam-e-Atham, pg. 291)}}

'''Ahmadiyya view'''

Ahmadiyya Muslims believe that this allegation is wrong, and that this allegation is raised without properly considering the context. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said

{{quote|"We inform our readers that our belief concerning Jesus is extremely noble. We most sincerely believe that he was a true prophet of Allah, and He loved him. As the Holy Qur’an tells us, we hold firm faith that he most sincerely believed in our lord and master prophet Muhammad Mustafa (may peace and blessings of Allah be on him) for his salvation, and that he was one of the hundreds of obedient servants of the Law of Moses. Therefore, we hold a great esteem for him in accordance with his exalted status."
(Nur-ul-Qur’an, Part 2, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, p. 374.)}}

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad responded to allegations as follows:

{{quote|“You say that I have, as if, insulted Hadrat Masih (the Messiah) to some extent by using an abusive word with reference to him. This is a misunderstanding of yours. I believe Hadrat Masih to be a true prophet, a chosen one and beloved servant of God. What I said in retaliation was in keeping with your own faith. Hence it is you, not me, who stand accused of the accusation that you level at me."

(] page 170)}}

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also said

{{quote|“When we are deeply hurt and unjustified attacks of all kinds are made on our Holy Prophet Muhammad, only then,as a warning, we retaliate in kind on the basis of their (Christians’) own authentic books. … they ought to point out in my writings any thing which I have written as a retaliatory response and it is not found in the Gospels. After all it is not possible for me, that on hearing the insult of the Holy Prophet, I remain silent."

(Malfuzat, Vol. 9, page 479, edition 1961)}}

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad published a poster on 20 December 1895, and explained his position as
follows:
{{quote|“Everywhere in my writing I (referring to Christ) have meant the supposed Jesus of the Christians; and the humble servant of God, ‘Isa bin Maryam , who was a prophet of God and who is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an is certainly never intended in my harsh comments. I adopted this path after constantly listening to the abuses of padres for the last forty years. Some ignorant mullahs—who should better be called blind and sightless— excuse the padres and say that they, the poor, helpless fellows, do not utter a word (against the Holy Prophet), nor are they in the least disrespectful to him. But it must be borne in mind that in reality it is the padres who are in the forefront in displaying contempt, hurling insults and shouting abuses. I have a stockpile of books by those padres who have filled their writings with hundreds of abuses. Any mullah who wishes should come and see for himself. And let it be remembered that if in future any padre, shunning the ways of abuse, speaks politely, I, too, shall be polite with him. At present they themselves are responsible for the attacks on their Jesus for under no circumstances they refrain from abuse and vituperation. We are sick of listening to them."(Nur-ul-Qur’an, Part 2, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, page 375)}}<ref>http://www.alislam.org/library/books/refutation/refutation-of-insult.pdf</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alislam.org/books/truth/gospels.html |title=Jesus of the Gospels |publisher=Alislam.org |date= |accessdate=2012-12-06}}</ref>

== See also ==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Literature ==
* Yohanan Friedmann, ''Prophecy Continuous – Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and Its Medieval Background''; Oxford University Press (2003) ISBN 965-264-014-X
* ''Jesus in India'', Ahmadiyya Muslim Foreign Mission Department, 1978, ISBN 978-1-85372-723-8; Original ''Masih Hindustan Mein'', Oriental & Religious Publications Ltd., Rabwah ()
* ''The Essence of Islam'', Islam International Publications, Ltd.; 2nd edition (2004), ISBN 1-85372-765-2
* ''Teachings of Islam'', Kessinger Publishing (August 2003), ISBN 978-0-7661-7614-0
* ''The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam'', The London Mosque Publishing, 1979
* Iain Adamson: ''Ahmad, The Guided One'', Islam International Publications, 2000
* S. R. Valentine, 'Islam & the Ahmadiyya Jama'at', Hurst & Co, London/New York, 2008

==Notes==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}

== External links ==
{{commons category}}
{{wikisource author}}
*
*
*
*
* – Truthfulness of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani (as) according to Holy Qur'an.


{{Ahmadiyya topics|state=collapsed}} {{Ahmadiyya topics|state=collapsed}}


{{Authority control|VIAF=100160685|GND=119095734|LCCN=n/50/39298|BNF=12119002p}} {{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Ghulam Ahmad, Mirza}}
{{Persondata
]
| NAME = Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = Religious figure
| DATE OF BIRTH = 13 February 1835
| PLACE OF BIRTH = ], ], ]
| DATE OF DEATH = 26 May 1908
| PLACE OF DEATH = ], ], ]
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 02:16, 26 December 2024

Indian religious leader and founder of the Ahmadiyya community (1835–1908)

Mīrzā Ghulām Aḥmad
مرزا غلام احمد
Ahmad, c. 1897
Born(1835-02-13)13 February 1835
Qadian, Gurdaspur, Sikh Empire
(present-day Punjab, India)
Died26 May 1908(1908-05-26) (aged 73)
Lahore, Punjab, British India
(present-day Punjab, Pakistan)
Spouses
Children List
ReligionAhmadiyya Islam
TitleFounder of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (13 February 1835 – 26 May 1908) was an Indian religious leader and the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement in Islam. He claimed to have been divinely appointed as the promised Messiah and Mahdī, in fulfillment of the Islamic prophecies regarding the end times, as well as the Mujaddid (centennial reviver) of the 14th Islamic century.

Part of a series on
Ahmadiyya
Beliefs and practices
Distinct views
Days of remembrance
Foundational texts and sciences
Key literature
Organizational structure
Key sitesHijaz United Kingdom Qadian Rabwah
Miscellaneous

Born to a family with aristocratic roots in Qadian, rural Punjab, Ahmad emerged as a writer and debater for Islam. When he was just over forty years of age, his father died and around that time he claimed that God began to communicate with him. In 1889, he took a pledge of allegiance from forty of his supporters at Ludhiana and formed a community of followers upon what he claimed was divine instruction, stipulating ten conditions of initiation, an event that marks the establishment of the Ahmadiyya movement. The mission of the movement, according to him, was the reinstatement of the absolute oneness of God, the revival of Islam through the moral reformation of society along Islamic ideals, and the global propagation of Islam in its pristine form. As opposed to the Christian and mainstream Islamic view of Jesus (or Isa), being alive in heaven to return towards the end of time, Ahmad asserted that he had in fact survived crucifixion and died a natural death. He traveled extensively across the Punjab preaching his religious ideas and rallied support by combining a reformist programme with his personal revelations which he claimed to receive from God, attracting thereby substantial following within his lifetime as well as considerable hostility particularly from the Muslim Ulama. He is known to have engaged in numerous public debates and dialogues with Christian missionaries, Muslim scholars and Hindu revivalists.

Ahmad was a prolific author and wrote more than ninety books on various religious, theological and moral subjects between the publication of the first volume of Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (The Proofs of Ahmadiyya, his first major work) in 1880 and his death in May 1908. Many of his writings bear a polemical and apologetic tone in favour of Islam, seeking to establish its superiority as a religion through rational argumentation, often by articulating his own interpretations of Islamic teachings. He advocated a peaceful propagation of Islam and emphatically argued against the permissibility of military Jihad under circumstances prevailing in the present age. By the time of his death, he had gathered an estimated 400,000 followers, especially within the United Provinces, the Punjab and Sindh and had built a dynamic religious organisation with an executive body and its own printing press. After his death he was succeeded by his close companion Hakīm Noor-ud-Dīn who assumed the title of Khalīfatul Masīh (successor of the Messiah).

Although Ahmad is revered by Ahmadi Muslims as the promised Messiah and Imām Mahdi, Muhammad nevertheless remains the central figure in Ahmadiyya Islam. Ahmad's claim to be a subordinate (ummati) prophet within Islam has remained a central point of controversy between his followers and mainstream Muslims, who believe Muhammad to be the last prophet.

Lineage and family

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a descendant of Mirza Hadi Beg, a member of the Barlas tribe. In 1530, Mirza Hadi Beg migrated from Samarkand (present-day Uzbekistan) along with an entourage of two hundred people consisting of his family, servants and followers. Travelling through Samarkand, they finally settled in the Punjab, India, where Mirza Hadi founded the town known today as Qadian during the reign of Mughal emperor Babur his distant relative. The family were all known as Mughals within the British governmental records of India probably due to the high positions it occupied within the Mughal Empire and their courts. Mirza Hadi Beg was granted a Jagir of several hundred villages and was appointed the Qadi (judge) of Qadian and the surrounding district. The descendants of Mirza Hadi are said to have held important positions within the Mughal Empire and had consecutively been the chieftains of Qadian.

Life

Early life and education

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was born on 13 February 1835 in Qadian, Punjab, then part of the Sikh Empire under Ranjit Singh (r. 1801–1839). The surviving child of twins born to an affluent Mughal family. He learned to read the Arabic text of the Qur'an and studied basic Arabic grammar and the Persian language from a teacher named Fazil-e-Illahi. At the age of 10, he learned from a teacher named Fazl Ahmad. Again at the age of 17 or 18, he learnt from a teacher named Gul Ali Shah. In addition, he also studied some works on medicine from his father, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, who was a physician. Ahmad's father, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, was a local chieftain (ra'is) who served in the Sikh Army.

From 1864 to 1868, upon his father's wishes, Ahmad worked as a clerk in Sialkot, where he would come into contact with Christian missionaries with whom he frequently engaged in debate. After 1868, he returned to Qadian, as per his father's wishes, where he was entrusted to look after some estate affairs. During all this time, Ahmad was known as a social recluse because he would spend most of his time in seclusion studying religious books and praying in the local mosque. As time passed, he began to engage more with the Christian missionaries, particularly in defending Islam against their criticism. He would often confront them in public debates, especially the ones based in the town of Batala.

In 1886, certain leaders of the Arya Samaj held discussion and debate with Ahmad about the truthfulness of Islam and asked for a sign to prove that Islam was a living religion. In order to dedicate special prayers for this purpose and so as to seek further divine guidance, Ahmad travelled to Hoshiarpur upon what he claimed was divine instruction. Here, he spent forty days in seclusion, a practice known as chilla-nashini. He travelled accompanied by three companions to the small two-storied house of one of his followers and was left alone in a room where his companions would bring him food and leave without speaking to him as he prayed and contemplated. He only left the house on Fridays and used an abandoned mosque for Jumu'ah (Friday prayers). It is during this period that he declared God had given him the glad tidings of an illustrious son.

Taking of the Bay'ah

See also: Bay'ah (Ahmadiyya) and Ten Conditions of Bai'at
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (seated centre) with some of his companions at Qadian c. 1899.

Ahmad claimed divine appointment as a reformer as early as 1882 but did not take any pledge of allegiance or initiation. In December 1888, Ahmad announced that God had ordained that his followers should enter into a bay'ah with him and pledge their allegiance to him. In January 1889, he published a pamphlet in which he laid out ten conditions or issues to which the initiate would abide by for the rest of his life. On 23 March 1889, he founded the Ahmadiyya community by taking a pledge from forty followers. The formal method of joining the Ahmadiyya movement included joining hands and reciting a pledge, although physical contact was not always necessary. This method of allegiance continued for the rest of his life and after his death by his successors.

His claim

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad proclaimed that he was the Promised Messiah and Mahdi. He claimed to be the fulfilment of various prophecies found in world religions regarding the second coming of their founders. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's followers say that he never claimed to be the same physical Jesus who lived nineteen centuries earlier. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Jesus died a natural death, in contradiction to the traditional Muslim view of Jesus' physical ascension to heaven and the traditional Christian belief of Jesus' crucifixion. He claimed in his books that there was a general decay of Islamic life and a dire need of a messiah. He argued that, just as Jesus had appeared in the 14th century after Moses, the promised messiah, i.e. the Mahdi, must also appear in the 14th century after Muhammad.

In Tazkiratush-Shahadatain, he wrote about the fulfillment of various prophecies. In it, he enumerated a variety of prophecies and descriptions from both the Qur'an and Hadith relating to the advent of the Mahdi and the descriptions of his age, which he ascribed to himself and his age. These include assertions that he was physically described in the Hadith and manifested various other signs; some of them being wider in scope, such as focusing on world events coming to certain points, certain conditions within the Muslim community, and varied social, political, economic, and physical conditions.

Post-claim

In time, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's claim of being the mujaddid (reformer) of his era became more explicit. In one of his most well-known and praised works, Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya, a voluminous work, he claimed to be the Messiah of Islam. Muslims have maintained that Jesus will return in the flesh during the last age. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, by contrast, asserted that Jesus had in fact survived crucifixion and died of old age much later in Kashmir, where he had migrated. According to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the promised Mahdi was a symbolic reference to a spiritual leader and not a military leader in the person of Jesus Christ as is believed by many Muslims. With this proclamation, he also rejected the idea of armed Jihad and argued that the conditions for such Jihad are not present in this age, which requires defending Islam by the pen and tongue but not with the sword. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote two books named Tuhfa-e-Qaiseriya and Sitara-e-Qaiseriya in which he invited Queen Victoria to embrace Islam and forsake Christianity.

Reaction of religious scholars

Some religious scholars turned against him, and he was often branded as a heretic, but many religious scholars praised him like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad among many others who praised him for his defense of Islam. After his death, opponents accused him of working for the British government due to the termination of armed Jihad, since his claims of being the Mahdi were made around the same time as the Mahdi of Sudan (Muhammad Ahmad).

Following his claim to be the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, one of his adversaries prepared a Fatwa (decree) of disbelief against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, declaring him a Kafir (disbeliever), a deceiver, and a liar. The decree permitted killing him and his followers. It was taken all around India and was signed by some two hundred religious scholars.

Some years later, a prominent Muslim leader and scholar, Ahmed Raza Khan, was to travel to the Hejaz to collect the opinions of the religious scholars of Mecca and Madina. He compiled these opinions in his work Husamul Haramain (The Sword of the Two Holy Mosques) in it, Ahmad was again labelled an apostate. The unanimous consensus of about thirty-four religious scholars was that Ahmad's beliefs were blasphemous and tantamount to apostasy and that he must be punished by imprisonment and, if necessary, by execution.

Journey to Delhi

Jama Masjid, Delhi, 1852, William Carpenter.

Ahmad went to Delhi, which was at the time considered a centre of religious learning and home to many prominent religious leaders, in 1891, with the intention of distinguishing what he believed to be the truth from falsehood. He published an advertisement in which he invited the scholars to accept his claim and to engage in a public debate with him regarding the life and death of Isa (Jesus), particularly Maulana Syed Nazeer Husain (1805–1901), who was a leading religious scholar. He also proposed three conditions that were essential for such a debate: that there should be a police presence to maintain peace, the debate should be in written form (for the purpose of recording what was said), and that the debate should be on the subject of the death of Jesus.

Eventually, it was settled, and Ahmad travelled to the Jama Masjid (main mosque) of Delhi accompanied by twelve of his followers, where some 5,000 people were gathered. Before the debate started, there was a discussion on the conditions, which led to the conclusion that the debate should not be upon the death of Jesus, but upon the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. He explained that his claim could only be discussed after the death of Jesus was proven, for Jesus was considered by many to be living and the one who will descend to Earth himself. Only when this belief was refuted could his claim to be the Messiah be discussed.

Upon this, there was a clamour among the crowds, and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was informed that the other party alleged that he was at odds with Islamic beliefs and was a disbeliever; therefore, it was not proper to debate with him unless he clarified his beliefs. Ahmad wrote his beliefs on a piece of paper and had it read aloud, but due to the clamour among the people, it could not be heard. Seeing that the crowd was drifting out of control and that violence was imminent, the police superintendent gave orders to disperse the audience, and the debate did not take place. A few days later, however, a written debate did take place between Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Maulwi Muhammad Bashir of Bhopal, which was later published.

Ahmad is known to have travelled extensively across Northern India during this period of his life and to have held various debates with influential religious leaders.

Challenge to opponents

Ahmad published a book called The Heavenly Decree, in which he challenged his opponents to a "spiritual duel" in which the question of whether someone was a Muslim or not would be settled by God based on the four criteria laid out in the Qur'an, namely, that a perfect believer will frequently receive glad tidings from God, that he will be given awareness about hidden matters and events of the future from God, that most of his prayers will be fulfilled and that he will exceed others in understanding novel finer points, subtleties and deeper meanings of the Qur'an.

The Sun and Moon eclipse

After announcing his claim to be the Messiah and Mahdi, his opponents demanded that he should produce the "heavenly sign" detailed in the tradition attributed to the 7th-century Imam Muhammad al-Baqir, also known as Muhammad bin Ali, in which a certain sign is stated about the appearance of the Mahdi:

For our Mahdi, there are two signs which have never happened since the earth and the heavens were created, i.e., the moon will be eclipsed on the first of the possible nights in the month of Ramadhan and the sun will be eclipsed in the middle of the possible days of the month of Ramadhan.

— Dar Qutni Vol. 1, page 188

Ahmadis maintain that this prophecy was fulfilled in 1894 and again in 1895, about three years after Ahmad proclaimed himself to be the Promised Mahdi and Messiah, with the lunar and solar eclipse during the month of Ramadhan, according to the Ahmadiyya interpretation of the prophecy. Ahmad declared that this was a sign of his truth and was in fulfillment of the tradition or prophecy. The eclipses being a sign of the Mahdi are also mentioned specifically in the Letters of Rabbani by Ahmad Sirhindi.

Scientific historical records indicate these eclipses occurred at the following dates:

Eclipse Date
Partial lunar eclipse 1894 March 21 2pm UT (7pm)
Hybrid solar eclipse 1894 April 6 4am-7am UT (9am-11am)
Total lunar eclipse 1895 March 11 03:39 UT
Partial solar eclipse 1895 March 23, 10:10 UT

Lawsuit

In 1897, a Christian missionary, Henry Martyn Clark, filed a lawsuit of attempted murder against Ahmad at the court of District Magistrate Captain Montagu William Douglas in the city of Ludhiana. The charge laid against him was that he hired a man by the name of Abdul Hameed to assassinate Clark. However, he was not detained by the police and was declared innocent by the then-magistrate Captain Douglas.

The Revealed Sermon

Main article: The Revealed Sermon

In 1900, on the occasion of the festival of Eid ul-Adha, he is said to have delivered an hour-long sermon extempore in Arabic expounding the meaning and philosophy of sacrifice. This episode is celebrated as one of the important events of the history of Ahmadiyya. The sermon was simultaneously written down by two of his companions and came to be known as the Khutba Ilhamiyya, the revealed or inspired sermon. Ahmadiyya literature states that during this sermon, there was a change in his voice, he appeared as if in a trance, in the grip of an unseen hand, and as if a voice from the unknown had made him its mouthpiece. After the sermon ended, Ahmad fell into prostration, followed by the rest of the congregation, as a sign of gratitude towards God.

Ahmad wrote later:

It was like a hidden fountain gushing forth and I did not know whether it was I who was speaking or an angel was speaking through my tongue. The sentences were just being uttered and every sentence was a sign of God for me.

— Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Haqeeqatul-Wahi

Challenge to John Alexander Dowie

Alexander Dowie in his robes as "Elijah the Restorer."

In 1899, Scottish-born American clergyman John Alexander Dowie laid claim to be the forerunner of the second coming of Christ. Ahmad exchanged a series of letters with him between 1903 and 1907. Ahmad challenged him to a prayer duel, where both would call upon God to expose the other as a false prophet. Ahmad stated:

The best way to determine whether Dowie's God is true or ours, is that Mr. Dowie should stop making prophecies about the destruction of all Muslims. Instead he should keep me alone in his mind and pray that if one of us is fabricating a lie, he should die before the other.

— Ghulam Ahmad

Dowie declined the challenge, calling Mirza Ghulam Ahmad the "silly Mohammedan Messiah". Ahmad prophesied:

Though he may try hard as he can to fly from death which awaits him, yet his flight from such a contest will be nothing less than death to him; and calamity will certainly overtake his Zion, for he must bear the consequences either of the acceptance of the challenge or its refusal. He will depart this life with great sorrow and torment during my lifetime.

The challenge of "prayer duel" was made by Mirza in September 1902. The Dictionary of American Biography states that after having been deposed during a revolt in which his own family was involved, Dowie endeavoured to recover his authority via the law courts without success and that he may have been a victim of some form of mania, as he suffered from hallucinations during his last illness. Dowie died before Mirza, in March 1907.

Encounter with the Agapemonites

In September 1902 the Rev. John Hugh Smyth-Pigott (1852-1927) proclaimed himself the Messiah and also claimed to be God while preaching in the Church known as "The Ark of the Covenant" in Clapton in London. This church was originally built by the Agapemonites, a religious movement founded by the Anglican priest Henry James Prince. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote to Smyth-Pigott, informing him that such a blasphemous proposition did not behove man, and that in the future he should abstain from making such claims, or he would be destroyed. This message was sent in November 1902. Newspapers in America and Europe published Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's notification. Despite this prophecy, Smyth-Piggot continued to claim divinity both before and after Mirza Ghulam's death in 1908, as reported by various contemporary newspapers at the time.

Last journey

Towards the end of 1907 and early 1908, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to have received numerous revelations informing him of his imminent death. In April 1908, he travelled to Lahore with his family and companions. Here, he gave many lectures. A banquet was arranged for dignitaries where Ahmad, upon request, spoke for some two hours explaining his claims, teachings and speaking in refutation of objections raised against his person; here, he preached reconciliation between Hindus and Muslims. He completed writing his last work, entitled Message of Peace, a day before his death.

Death

Ahmad was in Lahore at the home of Dr. Syed Muhammad Hussain (who was also his physician), when, on 26 May 1908, he died from dysentery. His body was subsequently taken to Qadian and buried there; he had previously claimed that an angel had told him that he would be buried there. By the time of his death, he had gathered an estimated 400,000 followers, especially within the United Provinces, the Punjab and Sindh.

Marriages and children

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad with his son, Mirza Sharif Ahmad.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad married twice. His first wife was his maternal cousin Hurmat Bibi. Later, they separated and lived separately for a long time.

Children

With his first wife, Hurmat Bibi, he had two sons:

  1. Mirza Sultan Ahmad (1853 – 2 July 1931)
  2. Mirza Fazal Ahmad (1855 – 1904)

With his second wife, Nusrat Jahan Begum, he had ten children, five of whom died in infancy:

  1. Ismat (15 April 1886 – July 1891)
  2. Bashir (7 August 1887 – 4 November 1888)
  3. Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmood Ahmad (12 January 1889 – 8 November 1965)
  4. Shaukat (1891 – 1892)
  5. Mirza Bashir Ahmad (20 April 1893 – 2 September 1963)
  6. Mirza Sharif Ahmad (24 May 1895 – 26 December 1961)
  7. (Nawab) Mubarika Begum (2 March 1897 – 23 May 1977)
  8. Mubarik (14 June 1899 – 16 September 1907)
  9. Amtul Naseer (28 January 1903 – 3 December 1903)
  10. (Nawab) Amtul Hafeez Begum (25 June 1904 – 6 May 1987)

Legacy

Main article: Ahmadiyya See also: Ahmadiyya Caliphate and Persecution of Ahmadis

Although Mirza Ghulam Ahmad aroused much opposition particularly from Muslim leaders owing to his messianic claims, opinion of him was not entirely negative. Many leading Muslim scholars, theologians and prominent journalists who were his contemporaries or had come into contact with him, had, despite differing with him in matters of belief, praised his personal character and acclaimed his works in the cause of Islam and the manner of his argumentation against proclaimants of other religions. The teachings that Jesus survived crucifixion, migrating towards the east in search of the Israelite tribes that had settled there and that he died a natural death upon earth, as propounded by Ahmad, have been a source of ongoing friction with the Christian church since they challenge the core beliefs of Christianity and would nullify the doctrines of vicarious atonement and resurrection, the two principal tenets of Christianity. Western scholars and historians have acknowledged this fact as one of the features of Ahmad's legacy.

Ahmad was the first to propose a post-crucifixion journey to India for Jesus and the first—other than the local people—to identify the Roza Bal shrine in Kashmir as the tomb of Jesus. These ideas have been further expanded upon since his death in light of subsequent findings, both by Ahmadis and individuals independent of the Ahmadiyya movement. However, the views remain controversial having been dismissed by some while being supported by others. Anthropological research tends to corroborate a link between the tribes of Israel and the peoples of south/central Asia, specifically the Pashtuns of Afghanistan and the people of Kashmir – as suggested by Ahmad in his book Jesus in India (and by others) – while findings from genetic evidence seem to remain equivocal. Jesus' survival of crucifixion and his natural death have become an important element of Ahmadi belief and Ahmadis have published extensively on this topic.

A number of modern Muslim scholars and Muslim intellectuals seem to conform to the idea of Jihad as fundamentally a peaceful religious endeavour rather than chiefly (or unconditionally) a militaristic struggle, in accordance with Ahmad's standpoint on the issue. Furthermore, some Islamic scholars have opined that Jesus has died (Ahmad's assertion) or have expressed their own confusion on this matter, though the majority orthodox position of most Muslims with regard to this issue has not changed.

One of the main sources of dispute during his lifetime and continuing since then is Ahmad's use of the terms nabi ("prophet") and rasul ("messenger") when referring to himself. Most non-Ahmadi Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last of the prophets and believe that Ahmad's use of these terms is a violation of the concept of the Finality of Prophethood. His followers fall into two factions in this regard. The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, which comprises by far the majority of Ahmadis, believes that Ahmad's prophetic status does not in any way infringe the finality of Muhammad's prophethood – to which it is wholly subservient and from which it is inseparable – and is in accordance with scriptural prophecies concerning the advent of the Messiah in Islam. This group is currently headed by Ahmad's fifth caliph, or successor, carrying the title of Khalifatul Masih, an institution believed to have been established soon after his death. The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement, which comprises a small fraction of all Ahmadis and believes in an allegorical understanding of these terms with reference to Ahmad, formed in 1914 when a number of prominent Ahmadis seceded from the main body soon after the election of Mirza Mahmud Ahmad as the second caliph. This group is administered by a body of people called the Anjuman Ishaat-e-Islam ("Movement for the Propagation of Islam"), headed by an Emir.

The movement initiated by Ahmad, which is often seen to have emerged as an Islamic religious response to the Christian and Arya Samaj missionary activity widespread in 19th-century India, and is viewed by its adherents as embodying the promised latter day revival of Islam, has since grown in organisational strength and in its own missionary programme under the leadership of its caliphate. Although it has expanded to over 200 countries and territories of the world, numbering an estimated 10 to 20 million, it has received a largely negative (often hostile) response from mainstream Muslims who view Ahmad as a false messiah and his teachings as heretical, particularly the teaching that he was a prophet.

Pakistan is the only state that specifically requires every Pakistani Muslim to denigrate Ahmad as an impostor and his followers as non-Muslims when applying for a passport or a national ID card.

See also

Notes

  1. Urdu: مرزا غلام احمد, romanizedMirzā Ghulām Aḥmad

References

  1. ^ Upal, M. Afzal (2021). "The Cultural Genetics of the Aḥmadiyya Muslim Jamāʿat". In Cusack, Carole M.; Upal, M. Afzal (eds.). Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Vol. 21. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 637–657. doi:10.1163/9789004435544_034. ISBN 978-90-04-43554-4. ISSN 1874-6691.
  2. ^ Korbel, Jonathan; Preckel, Claudia (2016). "Ghulām Aḥmad al-Qādiyānī: The Messiah of the Christians—Peace upon Him—in India (India, 1908)". In Bentlage, Björn; Eggert, Marion; Krämer, Hans-Martin; Reichmuth, Stefan (eds.). Religious Dynamics under the Impact of Imperialism and Colonialism. Numen Book Series. Vol. 154. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 426–442. doi:10.1163/9789004329003_034. ISBN 978-90-04-32511-1.
  3. Khan 2015, p. 21.
  4. "Faith and Thought" Vol. 37. The Victoria Institute, Great Britain. Original from the University of Michigan, p. 242.
  5. Hadhrat Ahmad by Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmood Ahmad.
  6. ^ "Complete Book: Chiefs of Punjab by Lepel Griffin". apnaorg.com.
  7. ^ Khan 2015, p. 22.
  8. Ahmad, Basharat (2008). The Great Reformer: Biography of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (Volume 1). AAIIL Inc USA. p. 24. ISBN 978-0913321980.
  9. Dard, Abdur Rahim (2008). Life of Ahmad. United Kingdom: Islam International Publications Ltd. p. 33. ISBN 978-1-85372-977-5.
  10. Evans, Nicholas H. A. (2020). Far from the Caliph's Gaze: Being Ahmadi Muslim in the Holy City of Qadian. Ithaca. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-5017-1571-6. OCLC 1107057359.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  11. Hadhrat Ahmad (PDF). Athens, Ohio: Islam International Publications. 1998. p. 15. OCLC 45764230.
  12. Khan 2015, p. 23.
  13. http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad-20080411MN.pdf.
  14. Ahmad, the Guided One, p. 91.
  15. Musleh Mau'ood, Khalifatul Masih II, in the Eyes of Non-Ahmadies, The Ahmadiyya Gazette, February 1997.
  16. Yohanan Friedmann. Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and its Medieval Background Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 140. "Like Muḥammad, he was then forty years of age; he was privileged in the beginning with a "good dream" (ru'yā ṣāliḥa), shown to him as "the break of dawn" (mithl falaq al-ṣubḥ). And when Ghulām Aḥmad's father died, Allāh revealed to him the Sūrat al-Ḍuḥā, which speaks of Allāh's help to Muḥammad when he was a destitute orphan."
  17. Simon Ross Valentine. Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jama'at: History, Belief, Practice Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 42. "Following the death of his father in 1876 Ahmad claimed to receive visions and revelations. 'In short', he declared, 'about forty years of my life were spent under the care of my revered father. Just as he was taken from the world, I started receiving Divine revelations with great intensity'. Having commenced receiving revelations at roughly the same age as the prophet Muhammad himself, Ahmad described his experiences in similar terms to the revelations received by the Prophet."
  18. Louis J. Hammann."Ahmaddiyyat - An Introduction" Ahmadiyya Muslim Community , 1985 "It was not, however, until his 41st year (1876) that Hazrat Ahmad began to receive the revelations that would lead him eventually to the conviction that in his person the advent of the Mahdi was fulfilled."
  19. ^ "Ten Conditions of Baiat". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  20. "The Ten Conditions of Bai'at". Archived from the original on 27 January 2011.
  21. Friedmann, The Ahmadiyya Movement: A Historical Survey, ISBN 965-264-014-X, p. 5.
  22. Khan 2015, p. 38–39.
  23. "A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – Founding of Ahmadiyya Jamaat". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  24. Schäfer, Peter; Cohen, Mark R. (1998). Toward the Millennium: Messianic Expectations from the Bible to Waco. Leiden/Princeton: Brill/Princeton UP. pp. 306–7. ISBN 90-04-11037-2.
  25. "Tadhkirah" (PDF). Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  26. "Fatah-Islam (1890)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  27. Ahmad, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam (2004). Tawdhi-i-Marām (1891). Islam International. ISBN 9781853727429. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  28. Izāla-i-Auhām (1891).
  29. Tazkiratush-Shahadatain, p. 38–39.
  30. ^ "The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement", by Maulana Muhammad Ali, Chapter 4: Mahdi and Messiah.
  31. Khan 2015, p. 42.
  32. "Chapter Two – Claims of Hadhrat Ahmad". Alislam.org. 24 June 1904. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  33. "The Fourteenth-Century's Reformer / Mujaddid", from the "Call of Islam", by Maulana Muhammad Ali.
  34. "Qadianism – A Critical Study" Archived 27 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine, by Abul Hasan Ali Nadwi.
  35. "Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah (as)".
  36. "An Introduction to the Hidden Treasures of Islam" (PDF).
  37. Islamic View of the Coming/Return of Jesus Archived 23 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine, by Dr. Ahmad Shafaat, 2003, Islamic Perspectives.
  38. Yohanan Friedmann. Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and its Medieval Background Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 121. "The affinity between the two can also be shown in the framework of Ghulām Aḥmad's prophetology. Muḥammad and Moses were similar to each other because they initiated the two prophetic chains; Jesus and Ghulām Aḥmad complete the divine scheme of things by terminating them. They must therefore also be similar. They resemble each other both in the circumstances of their appearance and in the nature of their prophetic mission. Both appeared when their respective communities were subject to foreign rule: the Jews under the Romans, and the Indian Muslims under the British. The religious conditions prevailing in their communities were also similar. The Jews were described in the Quran (1:7) as "those who earned wrath" (al-maghḍūb 'alayhim) by their lack of religiosity and by rejecting the message of Jesus. Most Muslims of Ghulām Aḥmad's time can be described in similar terms: their spirituality is lost, and only rituals remain of their religion. Furthermore, they rejected Ghulām Aḥmad in the same way that the Jews had rejected Jesus. In addition to these similar circumstances, Ghulām Aḥmad's message resembles that of Jesus in two important characteristics: he does not advocate jihād, and does not bring a new law, but strives rather to implement the sharī'a promulgated by his predecessor in the prophetic office. And to make the affinity between the two chains total, Ghulām Aḥmad is spiritually greater than Jesus in the same way that Muḥammad was greater than Moses."
  39. "The Essence of Islam, Vol. IV, p. 33" (PDF).
  40. "Jihad Brochure" (PDF). Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  41. Friedmann 2003, pp. 174–175.
  42. "Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, An Overview". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  43. "Argument 7: Defeat of Enemies". Alislam.org. Archived from the original on 8 February 2013. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  44. "Hussam ul Harmain" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2007.
  45. "Life of Ahmad, Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement" (PDF). Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  46. "The Heavenly Decree" (PDF). Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  47. "A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – Sign of the Eclipses". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  48. "Hadith on Imam Mahdi". alislam.org. Retrieved 20 March 2015. In Dar Qutni, the sign of the appearance of the Imam Mahdi is given in the following Hadith: 'For our Mahdi, there are two signs which have never happened since the earth and the heavens were created, i.e., the moon will be eclipsed on the first of the possible nights in the month of Ramadhan and the sun will be eclipsed in the middle of the possible days of the month of Ramadhan.'
  49. "The Truth About Eclipses". 1999. Retrieved 22 March 2015.
  50. "NASA - eclipse 1894 March 21".
  51. "NASA - Hybrid Solar Eclipse of 1894 April 06". eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov.
  52. "Total Lunar Eclipse of 11 Mar, 1895 AD". moonblink.info.
  53. "Partial Solar Eclipse of 26 Mar, 1895 AD". moonblink.info.
  54. Ian Adamson (1999). Ahmad the Guided One. Islam International Publications Ltd. pp. 177–193. ISBN 1-85372-597-8.
  55. "Lawsuit by Dr.Clark". Al Islam. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  56. Miraculous Knowledge of Arabic, The Review of Religions, July 1993.
  57. "Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  58. "A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam: Death of Dr. Dowie". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  59. S.R. Valentine, Islam and Ahmadiyya Jama'at, Foundation Books, 2008, p. 50.
  60. "Dictionary of Australian Biography: John Alexander Dowie". Gutenberg.net.au. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  61. "Clapton Pond Neighbourhood Action Group: The Clapton Messiah". 22 July 2003. Archived from the original on 22 July 2003.
  62. "Auckland Star, 1905".
  63. "The Cambrian, Friday, August 18 1905".
  64. "Wairarapa Age, 1909". Wairarapa Age. 9 March 1909. p. 5.
  65. "Nottingham Evening Post, March 1927".
  66. "A Message of Reconciliation" (PDF). Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  67. "A Brief History of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam – His Last Journey". Alislam.org. 27 April 1908. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  68. "Re-Institution of Khilafat". Alislam.org. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  69. "A Spiritual Challenge – Mubahala with Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari". Retrieved 19 December 2023.
  70. "His Last Testament". Al Islam. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  71. Valentine, Simon Ross. Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jamaʻat: History, Belief, Practice. p. 41.
  72. Valentine, Simon Ross (2008). Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jamaʻat: History, Belief, Practice. Columbia University Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-231-70094-8.
  73. "H.H. Risley and E.A. Gait, (1903), Report of the Census of India, 1901, Calcutta, Superintendent of Government Printing, p. 373". Chinese Heritage of the Australian Federation Project. Archived from the original on 5 February 2012.
  74. Dard, A. R. "Life of Ahmad" (PDF). Al-Islam. Islam International Publications Ltd. p. 38. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
  75. Khan 2015, p. 6.
  76. Brannon Ingram, 'Ahmadi Muslim Americans' in E. E. Curtis. Encyclopedia of Muslim-American History Infobase Publishing, 2010, p. 32.
  77. "Tributes to Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad". Retrieved 2 April 2016.
  78. "Majestic Writings of the Promised Messiah in View of Some Renowned Muslim Scholars" (PDF). Al-Islam. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
  79. "The Immaculate Character of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad". Archived from the original on 14 May 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  80. Francis Robinson.‘The British Empire and the Muslim World' in Judith Brown, Roger Louis (ed) The Oxford History of the British Empire: Volume IV: The Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 411. "At their most extreme religious strategies for dealing with the Christian presence might involve attacking Christian revelation at its heart, as did the Punjabi Muslim, Ghulam Ahmad (d. 1908), who founded the Ahmadiyya missionary sect. He claimed that he was the messiah of the Jewish and Muslim tradition; the figure known as Jesus of Nazareth had not died on the cross but survived to die in Kashmir."
  81. Yohanan Friedmann. Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and its Medieval Background Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 114. "He realized the centrality of the crucifixion and of the doctrine of vicarious atonement in the Christian dogma, and understood that his attack on these two was an attack on the innermost core of Christianity."
  82. Kambiz GhaneaBassiri. A History of Islam in America: From the New World to the New World Order Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 208. "Ghulam Ahmad denied the historicity of Jesus' crucifixion and claimed that Jesus had fled to India where he died a natural death in Kashmir. In this way, he sought to neutralize Christian soteriologies of Christ and to demonstrate the superior rationality of Islam."
  83. Khan 2015, p. 47.
  84. "Jesus – A Humble Prophet of God".
  85. "May 2015". The Review of Religions.
  86. Tahir Ijaz & Qamar Ijaz (2003). "Jesus in India: A Review of the World Literature (1899-1999)" (PDF). The Muslim Sunrise (4).
  87. McCarthy, Rory; Jerusalem (16 January 2010). "Pashtun clue to lost tribes of Israel". The Observer – via The Guardian.
  88. "Resources". css.ethz.ch. 20 June 2023.
  89. "The Lost Tribes of Israel in India – A Genetic Perspective". The Review of Religions (CAL). March 2012. Retrieved 1 December 2014.
  90. Leirvik, Oddbjørn (2010). Images of Jesus Christ in Islam: 2nd Edition. Continuum. pp. 146–8. ISBN 978-1-4411-7739-1.
  91. Zahniser, A. H. Mathias (2008). The Mission and Death of Jesus in Islam and Christianity. Orbis Books. pp. 61–2. ISBN 978-1-57075-807-2.
  92. Ayoub, Mahmoud; Omar, Irfan A. (2010). Muslim View Of Christianity: Essays on Dialogue by Mahmoud Ayoub. Logos Press. pp. 172–3. ISBN 978-81-7268-197-5.
  93. Did Jesus Die on the Cross? The History of Reflection on the End of His Earthly Life in Sunni Tafsir Literature, Joseph L. Cumming Yale University. May 2001, pp. 26–30.
  94. "The Second Coming of Jesus Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine", Renaissance – Monthly Islamic Journal, 14(9), September 2004.
  95. Islahi, Amin. Tadabbur-i-Qur'an (1st ed.). Lahore: Faran Foundation. OCLC 60341215. Vol. 2, p. 243.
  96. "The Holy Prophet: The Messenger of Allah and the Seal of Prophets". Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  97. "The Ahmadiyya Muslim Understanding of Finality of Prophethood" (PDF). Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  98. ^ Friedmann 2003, p. 132.
  99. "Who are the Ahmadi?". 28 May 2010 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  100. "Five Pillars of Islam". www.islam101.com. Retrieved 19 December 2023.
  101. "Further Similarities and Differences: (between esoteric/exoteric & Sunni/Shia) and (between Islam/Christianity/Judaism)", Exploring World Religions, 2001, Oxford University Press Canada.
  102. "Finality of Prophethood - Hadhrat Muhammad (PUBH) the Last Prophet". Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.
  103. The Question of Finality of Prophethood, The Promised Messiah and Mahdi, by Dr. Aziz Ahmad Chaudhry, Islam International Publications Limited.
  104. Friedmann 2003, pp. 147–153.
  105. Simon Ross Valentine (2008). Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jama'at: History, Belief, Practice. Columbia University Press. pp. 56–7. ISBN 9781850659167. Retrieved 25 August 2014.
  106. "Major Branches of Religions". Adherents.com. 28 October 2005. Archived from the original on 15 March 2015. Retrieved 19 April 2015.
  107. See:
    • Breach of Faith. Human Rights Watch. June 2005. p. 8. Retrieved 29 March 2014. Estimates of around 20 million would be appropriate.
    • Larry DeVries; Don Baker & Dan Overmyer (January 2011). Asian Religions in British Columbia. University of Columbia Press. ISBN 978-0-7748-1662-5. Retrieved 29 March 2014. The community currently numbers around 15 million spread around the world.
    • Juan Eduardo Campo (2009). Encyclopedia of Islam. Infobase. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-8160-5454-1. Retrieved 29 March 2014. The total size of the Ahmadiyya community in 2001 was estimated to be more than 10 million.
    • "Ahmadiyya Muslims". pbs.org. 20 January 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
  108. Jocelyne Cesari (2014). The Awakening of Muslim Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-1-107-04418-0. When applying for a passport, every Pakistani Muslim must sign a statement deriding Ahmad and denouncing his followers as non-Muslims.
  109. Hanif, Mohammed (16 June 2010). "Why Pakistan's Ahmadi community is officially detested". BBC News.

Bibliography

External links

Ahmadiyya topics
Beliefs and practices
Distinct views
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Literature
Ahmadiyya Muslim Community
Miscellaneous
Categories: