Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sixty Watt Shaman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:30, 27 May 2013 editWolfinruins (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,476 editsm assessed← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:57, 9 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,279,202 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Metal}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi| date = 10 December 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Sixty Watt Shaman }} {{Old AfD multi| date = 10 December 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Sixty Watt Shaman (2nd nomination)}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|living=yes|listas=Sixty Watt Shaman|

{{WikiProject Biography {{WikiProject Biography|musician-work-group=yes}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Metal}}
|living=yes
|class=c
|musician-work-group=yes
|listas = Sixty Watt Shaman
}} }}

⚫ {{WikiProject Metal|class=c}}
== Genre ==

There is absolutely nothing that connects this band and their musical performance to the "stoner rock" style.

Therefore, such clssifications are removed. ] (]) 22:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

If you've got a pair of eyes which are in working condition you can clearly see that stoner rock was there even before my . See? It was denoted as underground rock but it was redirected at ]. But 'underground rock' isn't a valid subgenre. It's an umbrella term. ] is now sourced anyway. ] (]) 06:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:57, 9 February 2024

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
WikiProject iconMetal
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

Genre

There is absolutely nothing that connects this band and their musical performance to the "stoner rock" style.

Therefore, such clssifications are removed. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

If you've got a pair of eyes which are in working condition you can clearly see that stoner rock was there even before my edit. See? It was denoted as underground rock but it was redirected at stoner rock. But 'underground rock' isn't a valid subgenre. It's an umbrella term. Stoner rock is now sourced anyway. Shallowmead077 (talk) 06:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Categories: