Revision as of 01:15, 7 June 2013 editHostBot (talk | contribs)Bots406,085 edits Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:20, 7 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(22 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | ||
Hi '''CurrentUK'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (]) | Hi '''CurrentUK'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (]) | ||
<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small |
<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small>This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, ] (]) 01:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
|} | |} | ||
]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ||
==Talkback== | |||
{{talkback|OrangesRyellow|Cheeseburger|ts=11:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
] (]) 11:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Rotherham == | |||
Please read ], and ]. Editors who make personal attacks on other editors can be blocked from editing. ] (]) 09:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
:And, while you're at it, please also read ]. There is no need to include citations in the opening paragraphs, unless the statements are contentious and so long as the citations are included in the main text. All the citations in the introductory section should really be removed, not added to. ] (]) 12:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Again... You have clearly not yet read, or implemented, ]. Please do so, and withdraw your comments on the article talk page. Thank you. ] (]) 10:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
:...also, please withdraw . ] (]) 10:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
== "12 year old" == | |||
Hi <s>CurrentUK</s>Cuz. Please could you explain where you think I may have broken the "rule on Misplaced Pages against behaving like a 12-year-old supporting his/her clique", if such a rule existed, which you suspect it does not? Thanks. ] (]) 09:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
I don't know why these respectable users are wasting their time with you. From your past history, you have proven to be, to say bluntly, a downright terrible person. None of these people have anything against you and if they did, they wouldn't last on this project for very long. I suggest you rethink your issues, and try to reshape your outlook. Peace ] (]) | |||
== Quotes == | |||
Hi: Thanks for the addition to ]. However, I shortened and reworded it quite a bit. For one thing, we try to keep our wording as neutral and factual as possible, because we're an encyclopaedia; when using an emotional source like the ''Daily Mail'', that involves quite a bit of toning down, but the facts and figures speak for themselves. Secondly and more importantly, we don't use long quotes if we can possibly avoid it, and always mark them off very explicitly (either inverted commas or an absolutely clear text device such as the <nowiki><blockquote></nowiki> tag). We have to be absolutely scrupulous about copyright - with no "fair use" wiggle room for wording - because everything on Misplaced Pages is available for reuse by anyone for any purpose, with very limited and specific exceptions for some files. So it isn't like academic publishing or even journalism. See ] and its links for full details, and ] for writing guidelines. In addition, encyclopaedic writing summarises. One reason we have references is so the reader can go look up the full story, or seek information on some aspect we didn't cover. So please, next time, summarise. Thanks! ] (]) 16:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hello, | |||
The above nomination of an article upon which you were a primary editor has been approved for DYK. | |||
] (]) 16:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
==DYK for Peterborough sex abuse case== | |||
{{tmbox | |||
|type = notice | |||
|image = ] | |||
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that in reaction to child sexual exploitation cases ] and ], police investigated and prosecuted a similar case ]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Peterborough sex abuse case|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Peterborough sex abuse case|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], , )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> —] | ] 07:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Aylesbury sex gang == | |||
Can you please refrain from removing maintenance tags from articles without reason, especially when the required changes have not been made. Users are not required to provide reasons to why they feel as if a certain tag is necessary. When a user associated with the certain tag lands on the page, they will decide for themselves if the article has met the criteria or not. | |||
Going by the message you left on my talk page, you seem irritated. I am interested to know why exactly. Thanks. ] (]) 03:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
:{{U|CurrentUK}} - This is now under active discussion at the article talk page and your comments would be welcome. ] (]) 21:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
== July 2016 == | |||
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person{{spaces|1}}on ], but you didn't support your changes with a ], so I removed it. Misplaced Pages has a very strict policy concerning ], so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you! <!-- Template:uw-biog1 --> ] (]) 09:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for July 9== | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Reference errors on 24 September == | |||
] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: | |||
*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small> and a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | ) | |||
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (], ]) 21:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:20, 7 March 2022
Welcome
Hello CurrentUK, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
A cheeseburger for you!
Hi CurrentUK. I have worked on articles similar to the ones you just created. Looking forward to working with you. Cheers !!!! OrangesRyellow (talk) 10:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC) |
CurrentUK, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi CurrentUK! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Talkback
Hello, CurrentUK. You have new messages at OrangesRyellow's talk page.Message added 11:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
OrangesRyellow (talk) 11:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Rotherham
Please read WP:AGF, and WP:NPA. Editors who make personal attacks on other editors can be blocked from editing. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- And, while you're at it, please also read WP:LEADCITE. There is no need to include citations in the opening paragraphs, unless the statements are contentious and so long as the citations are included in the main text. All the citations in the introductory section should really be removed, not added to. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Again... You have clearly not yet read, or implemented, WP:NPA. Please do so, and withdraw your comments on the article talk page. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- ...also, please withdraw this. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
"12 year old"
Hi CurrentUKCuz. Please could you explain where you think I may have broken the "rule on Misplaced Pages against behaving like a 12-year-old supporting his/her clique", if such a rule existed, which you suspect it does not? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't know why these respectable users are wasting their time with you. From your past history, you have proven to be, to say bluntly, a downright terrible person. None of these people have anything against you and if they did, they wouldn't last on this project for very long. I suggest you rethink your issues, and try to reshape your outlook. Peace TheGracefulSlick (talk)
Quotes
Hi: Thanks for the addition to Rape in Pakistan. However, I shortened and reworded it quite a bit. For one thing, we try to keep our wording as neutral and factual as possible, because we're an encyclopaedia; when using an emotional source like the Daily Mail, that involves quite a bit of toning down, but the facts and figures speak for themselves. Secondly and more importantly, we don't use long quotes if we can possibly avoid it, and always mark them off very explicitly (either inverted commas or an absolutely clear text device such as the <blockquote> tag). We have to be absolutely scrupulous about copyright - with no "fair use" wiggle room for wording - because everything on Misplaced Pages is available for reuse by anyone for any purpose, with very limited and specific exceptions for some files. So it isn't like academic publishing or even journalism. See this page and its links for full details, and this page for writing guidelines. In addition, encyclopaedic writing summarises. One reason we have references is so the reader can go look up the full story, or seek information on some aspect we didn't cover. So please, next time, summarise. Thanks! Yngvadottir (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Peterborough sex abuse case
Hello,
The above nomination of an article upon which you were a primary editor has been approved for DYK.
Georgejdorner (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Peterborough sex abuse case
On 25 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peterborough sex abuse case, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in reaction to child sexual exploitation cases in Rochdale and in Rotherham, police investigated and prosecuted a similar case in Peterborough? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peterborough sex abuse case. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Aylesbury sex gang
Can you please refrain from removing maintenance tags from articles without reason, especially when the required changes have not been made. Users are not required to provide reasons to why they feel as if a certain tag is necessary. When a user associated with the certain tag lands on the page, they will decide for themselves if the article has met the criteria or not. Going by the message you left on my talk page, you seem irritated. I am interested to know why exactly. Thanks. Uamaol (talk) 03:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- CurrentUK - This is now under active discussion at the article talk page and your comments would be welcome. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
Hello, I'm OnionRing. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Halifax sex gang, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Misplaced Pages has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! OnionRing (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halifax sex gang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 24 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Telford sex gang page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Halifax child sex abuse ring for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Halifax child sex abuse ring is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Halifax child sex abuse ring until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)