Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment | User conduct Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:44, 7 June 2013 editObiwankenobi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,991 edits try search box← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:54, 7 August 2021 edit undoTrialpears (talk | contribs)Administrators33,082 editsm Change parameter name for Archives template, typo(s) fixed: bilty → bilityTag: AWB 
(30 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{historical|comment=<br>'''The ] process has been discontinued as a result of {{oldid|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U|637099409|this discussion}}.'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}}
{{archivebox|
{{archives|
*] *]
*] *]
Line 8: Line 9:
*] *]
*] *]
*]
|search=yes}}
|search=yes
|searchprefix=Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive}}


This page is for archiving user conduct disputes listed on ]. Archived disputes should not be added to. Disputes should be archived under any of the following circumstances: This page is for archiving user conduct disputes listed on ]. Archived disputes should not be added to. Disputes should be archived under any of the following circumstances:
Line 30: Line 33:
| Outcome of the Rfc (agreement, arbitration, mediation, etc).--> | Outcome of the Rfc (agreement, arbitration, mediation, etc).-->
|- |-
|] | ]
| 24 October 2014
|29 March 2013
| Canvassing, Ownership of Articles, Battleground behavior
|Problematic creation of navboxes and other content
| Closed due to lack of progress.
|some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
|-
| ]
| 26 August 2014
| Copyright and sourcing issues
| 30 SW has not edited since just before the RFC was filed. RFC indefinitely suspended due to inactivity.
|-
| ]
| July 29 2014
| Copyright concerns, ownership of articles
| several participants blocked as socks, Dan56 reminded of relevant policies
|-
| ]
| 11 September 2014
| Worldedixor's problematic manner in handling disputes
| Closed due to inactivity
|-
| ]
| 15 October 2014
| Page protection of template
| Page protection level reduced, RFC closed per request of filer.
|-
| ]
| 22 August 2014
| Alleged POV pushing, page ownership, cherry-picking of sources
| Further discussion is recommended, possibly followed by a topic-ban request (at ANI) or arbitration if necessary.
|-
| ]
| 11 March 2014
| Inability for the IP to follow policy
| Delisted for inactivity and very little comments, no edits since day 2 of RFC.
|-
| ]
| 28 February 2014
| Aggressive lack of understanding and violations of various Misplaced Pages policies
| Involved and outside views; no response; closed due to inactivity. Uncertainty regarding whether subject retired from Misplaced Pages or not; recommendation to escalate dispute if issues persist in any case.
|-
| ]
| 11 January 2014
| Issues
| "Whitewashing" not firmly established, but likely NPA violations are.
|-
| ]
| 26 January 2014
| Overzealous in efforts to stamp out what they consider fringe
| No clear consensus that user is disruptive in what is already a contentious area.
|-
| ]
| 15 February 2014
| Dispute over user signatures
| Nearly all comments occurred within a week of original complaint. Clear consensus was that the signature was not offensive
|-
| ]
| 9 February 2014
| Request for unblock, sockpuppetry issues
| Consensus is to leave the user blocked.
|-
| ]
| 20 November 2013
| Perform large numbers of edits, with relatively small amounts of actual changes to the articles and not using edit summaries.
| Closed due to inactivity and low participation.
|-
| ]
| 15 August 2013
| Long-term incivility, personal attacks, and edit-warring
| No conclusive outcomes, Misplaced Pages is not a battleground, edit warring is unconstructive
|-
| ]
| 22 June 2013
| Uncivil behavior, edit warring, and sock puppetry, mostly related to Islam topics
| Discussion went stale after a few weeks, with Baboon43 refusing to participate, before the issue was taken to AN, resulting in an indefinite block.
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 39: Line 112:
| Talk page and behavioral issues | Talk page and behavioral issues
| Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U | Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U
|-
| ]
| 30 April 2013
| Problematic behaviour around AfDs and notability issues related to Dungeons & Dragons
| There was consensus that Folken's approach needs to change. The closing admin suggested that he agree to a voluntary topic ban regarding deletion issues in the problem area.
|-
| ]
| 29 March 2013
| Problematic creation of navboxes and other content
| Some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 44: Line 127:
| To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit | To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit
| No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision | No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision
|-
| ]
| 20 January 2013
| Tendentious editing/POV issues
| All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 49: Line 137:
| Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing | Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing
| Closed due to inactivity | Closed due to inactivity
|-
|]
|20 January 2013
|Tendentious editing/POV issues
|All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct
|-
|} |}


Line 60: Line 142:
{| class="wikitable" {| class="wikitable"
!Name!!Start date!!Description!!First two certifiers!!Notes !Name!!Start date!!Description!!First two certifiers!!Notes

<!-- The following is the now-deprecated template that included the names of the certifiers
|-
| ]
| Date filed
| Issues
| ], ]
| Outcome of the Rfc (agreement, arbitration, mediation, etc). -->
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 80: Line 154:
| ], ] | ], ]
| Epeefleche is broadly correct to remove unsourced content, and Danjel has often acted wrongly in restoring unsourced content.<br />Also, Danjel's conduct is widely seen as hounding. | Epeefleche is broadly correct to remove unsourced content, and Danjel has often acted wrongly in restoring unsourced content.<br />Also, Danjel's conduct is widely seen as hounding.
|-
| ]
| 29 December 2012
| Mass edits at high speed, improper use of rollback, deficient listening skills
| ], ]
| Broad consensus that Morriswa's work was indeed problematic, a problem now recognized by Morriswa. Good will and good faith all around, fortunately.
|-
| ]
| 12 December 2012
| excessive editing of the category namespace
| ], ]
| No users endorsed the certifier's position, only statements critical of the certifiers and the process received significant support.
|-
|-
| ]
| 21 November 2012
| Civility, misuse of edit summaries, sopaboxing, biting the newcomers
| ], ]
| No consensus, closing admin suggested taking larger issues to arbitration
|-
| ]
| 29 November 2012
| Civility, edit warring, consensus
| ], ]
| Closed due to inactivity; Bluerim's last edit was two months before closure
|-
| ]
| 01 November 2012
| Incivility, ownership, Good articles, lack of edit summaries, ] article
| ], ]
| Topic ban from ]
|-
| ]
| 30 November 2012
| Concerns strongly asserted opinions about en dashes and the Manual of Style, and allegations of disruption
| ], ]
| Taken to ] for action (; ).
|-
| ]
| 19 November 2012‎
| To determine whether editor ] in discussions about article content.
| ], ]
| Closed a second time. RfC/U of limited scope concluded there were behavioral problems.
|-
| ]
| 3 November 2012
| Concerns regarding possible personal attacks, Possible ownership, and disruptive behavior as a result of bias against the LDM church.
| ], ]
| Delisted due to inactivity
|-
| ]
| 3 December 2012
| Lack of compliance with verifiability and sourcing policies and guidelines, and original research.
| ], ]
| Unanimous consensus that the problems identified in the RfC exist. Paul Bedson was indefinitely blocked.
|-
| ]
| 3 December 2012
| Accountability for Administrative Actions
| ], ]
| Several highly endorsed viewpoints. Referred to Arbitration.
|-
| ]
| 30 October 2012
| Civility, Use of offensive language
| ], ]
| no consensus achieved.
|-
| ]
| 19 October 2012
| Personal attacks on several users
| ], ]
| no consensus due achieved.
|-
| ]
| 6 August 2012
| Copyright verification, disruption
| ], ]
| no consensus due to lack of community input
|-
| ]
| 24 August 2012
| Disruptive interactions at talk pages
| ], ]
| User indef blocked for sockpuppetry
|-
| ]
| 28 July 2012
| Battleground mentality, COI/activism, off-wiki harassment of an editor
| ], ]
| Suspended due to Bittergrey being blocked for disruption on 30 July 2012
|-
| ]
| 25 June 2012
| Outing, violations of neutrality/weight and battleground-like conduct
| ], ]
| No consensus achieved
|-
| ]
| 5 August 2012
| Edit warring and personal attack
| ], ]
| Agreement. One month break followed by 3 month BLP restriction and 6 month 1RR and civility parole
|-
| ]
| 12 May 2012
| Talk page disruption
| ]
| No consensus achieved.
|-
| ]
| 7 March 2012
| Article deletion nominations
| ], ]
| User offered to be more in line with community consensus
|-
| ]
| 20 March 2012
| Biased editing
| ], ]
| Delisted due to inactivity
|-
| ]
| 29 February 2012
| Excessive article creation, disruption
| ], ]
| Closed due to editor indef blocked
|-
| ]
| 10 January 2012
| Potential editing against consensus and lack of discussion on talk pages.
| ], ]
| Closed after expiring without any response from Kolins
|-
| ]
| 25 January 2012
| Various
| ], ]
| No consensus was reached
|-
| ]
| 14 January 2012
| alleged persistently uncivil edit summaries
| ], ]
| DocKino has acknowledged that editing Misplaced Pages with frustration and anger is not conductive to a collaborative editing environment and will endeavor to refrain from said commentary in the future.
|-
|- |-
|} |}




] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 20:54, 7 August 2021

This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
The WP:RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion.
Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues.

Archives

This page is for archiving user conduct disputes listed on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Archived disputes should not be added to. Disputes should be archived under any of the following circumstances:

  1. If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
  2. The parties to the dispute agree.
  3. The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.

If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

Archived disputes

  • Newer entries towards the top
  • This page only displays user RFCs from the most recent year and the current year, older discussions can be found in the archives, a search box is provided above
  • As of March 25, 2013, the names of the certifiers are no longer a required field. You can find this information easily by clicking the link to the RFC itself.
Name Start date Description Notes
Atsme 24 October 2014 Canvassing, Ownership of Articles, Battleground behavior Closed due to lack of progress.
30 SW 26 August 2014 Copyright and sourcing issues 30 SW has not edited since just before the RFC was filed. RFC indefinitely suspended due to inactivity.
Dan56 July 29 2014 Copyright concerns, ownership of articles several participants blocked as socks, Dan56 reminded of relevant policies
Worldedixor 11 September 2014 Worldedixor's problematic manner in handling disputes Closed due to inactivity
Redrose64 15 October 2014 Page protection of template Page protection level reduced, RFC closed per request of filer.
Middayexpress 22 August 2014 Alleged POV pushing, page ownership, cherry-picking of sources Further discussion is recommended, possibly followed by a topic-ban request (at ANI) or arbitration if necessary.
24.0.133.234 11 March 2014 Inability for the IP to follow policy Delisted for inactivity and very little comments, no edits since day 2 of RFC.
Scholarlyarticles 28 February 2014 Aggressive lack of understanding and violations of various Misplaced Pages policies Involved and outside views; no response; closed due to inactivity. Uncertainty regarding whether subject retired from Misplaced Pages or not; recommendation to escalate dispute if issues persist in any case.
Arzel.2 11 January 2014 Issues "Whitewashing" not firmly established, but likely NPA violations are.
QuackGuru2 26 January 2014 Overzealous in efforts to stamp out what they consider fringe No clear consensus that user is disruptive in what is already a contentious area.
PrivateWiddle 15 February 2014 Dispute over user signatures Nearly all comments occurred within a week of original complaint. Clear consensus was that the signature was not offensive
Colton Cosmic 9 February 2014 Request for unblock, sockpuppetry issues Consensus is to leave the user blocked.
Oranjelo100 20 November 2013 Perform large numbers of edits, with relatively small amounts of actual changes to the articles and not using edit summaries. Closed due to inactivity and low participation.
Joefromrandb 15 August 2013 Long-term incivility, personal attacks, and edit-warring No conclusive outcomes, Misplaced Pages is not a battleground, edit warring is unconstructive
Baboon43 22 June 2013 Uncivil behavior, edit warring, and sock puppetry, mostly related to Islam topics Discussion went stale after a few weeks, with Baboon43 refusing to participate, before the issue was taken to AN, resulting in an indefinite block.
Arzel 13 May 2013 Talk page and behavioral issues Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U
Folken de Fanel 30 April 2013 Problematic behaviour around AfDs and notability issues related to Dungeons & Dragons There was consensus that Folken's approach needs to change. The closing admin suggested that he agree to a voluntary topic ban regarding deletion issues in the problem area.
Jax 0677 29 March 2013 Problematic creation of navboxes and other content Some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
Will Beback 23 March 2013 To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision
CartoonDiablo 20 January 2013 Tendentious editing/POV issues All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct
Apostle12 21 December 2012 Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing Closed due to inactivity


Name Start date Description First two certifiers Notes
Cantaloupe2 31 January 2013 Concerns about civility, battlegrounding, and related conduct issues AndrewDressel, CorporateM Serious and valid problems with Cantaloupe2's conduct exist. The matter might be taken up by ArbCom.
Epeefleche 15 January 2013 Removal of unsourced content from articles Danjel, Graham87 Epeefleche is broadly correct to remove unsourced content, and Danjel has often acted wrongly in restoring unsourced content.
Also, Danjel's conduct is widely seen as hounding.
Categories: