| Revision as of 00:05, 10 June 2013 editApolloLee (talk | contribs)110 edits →Journatic: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:46, 28 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,908 edits not around since April 2022 | ||
| (396 intermediate revisions by 73 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=12 April 2022}} | |||
| {{Talkpage}} | |||
| '''Inactive Editor''' | |||
| Due to life interceding, I have been inconvenienced and so, unfortunately, has Misplaced Pages. Hope Misplaced Pages can withstand my absence, | |||
| Any edits performed by me will be infrequent and random, as a result. Cheers, | |||
| ----Lexein Fishette | |||
| <!--{{User:Chzz/pirate}}{{listen |filename=International Talk Like A Pirate Day PSA3.ogg|title=Happy ITLAPD|description=Capn' slappy and Ol Chumbucket|pos=left|image=]}} | <!--{{User:Chzz/pirate}}{{listen |filename=International Talk Like A Pirate Day PSA3.ogg|title=Happy ITLAPD|description=Capn' slappy and Ol Chumbucket|pos=left|image=]}} | ||
| {{clear}}--> | {{clear}}--> | ||
| Line 4: | Line 10: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 20K | |maxarchivesize = 20K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 22 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 16: | ||
| |archive = User talk:Lexein/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Lexein/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archives|auto=short|search=yes}} | |||
| ). Please stay in the top three tiers. I will also try.]] | ). Please stay in the top three tiers. I will also try.]] | ||
| '''Hello, ] to my talk page!''' | '''Hello, ] to my talk page!''' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 22: | ||
| *(] - they will be unbolded at my discretion.) | *(] - they will be unbolded at my discretion.) | ||
| *I will reply here. | *I will reply here. | ||
| *''If I comment on your talk page, please respond there.'' I watch ], and I don't bother with {{tl|Talkback}}, so don't you bother. | *''If I comment on your talk page, please respond there.'' I watch ], and I don't bother with {{tl|Talkback}} or pingponging, so don't you bother. | ||
| Thank you!<br/><br/> | Thank you!<br/><br/> | ||
| {{anchor|Hierarchy}} | |||
| ; Heirarchy of Disagreement | ; Heirarchy of Disagreement | ||
| See that pyramid on the right? I actually _do_ prefer to stay in the top tiers. Unfortunately, the pyramid assumes that all actors are discussing in good faith, stating true facts, and not misrepresenting others' words. I'm afraid these do not hold true for deletionists and trolls, who choose to bend the language, meaning, and spirit of policy, and even outright lie, to achieve maximum destruction, and maximum disturbance to the encyclopedia project. So the reader will find me stepping off the pyramid from time to time to sternly deal with raging deletionist and troll behavior. Sorry if this is upsetting, but please see ] and ] for more on opening one's eyes and seeing the facts before one. --Lexein | See that pyramid on the right? I actually _do_ prefer to stay in the top tiers. Unfortunately, the pyramid assumes that all actors are discussing in good faith, stating true facts, and not misrepresenting others' words. I'm afraid these do not hold true for deletionists and trolls, who choose to bend the language, meaning, and spirit of policy, and even outright lie, to achieve maximum destruction, and maximum disturbance to the encyclopedia project. So the reader will find me stepping off the pyramid from time to time to sternly deal with raging deletionist and troll behavior. Sorry if this is upsetting, but please see ] and ] for more on opening one's eyes and seeing the facts before one. --Lexein | ||
| Line 74: | Line 79: | ||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''Holiday Cheer''' | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''Holiday Cheer''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid blue;" |''']''' '']'' is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes ], and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid blue;" |''']''' '']'' is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes ], and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == New messages == | == New messages == | ||
| Line 80: | Line 85: | ||
| {{tb|Talk:List of common misconceptions#Testosterone}} | {{tb|Talk:List of common misconceptions#Testosterone}} | ||
| == References to support personal opinions? == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| and placed . He looks to be ripe for a block under ], ], ] and is working toward ]. One more vandalistic edit and I will block him myself. ''']''' '']'' 10:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :sorry for being abrupt, but this is most annoying. | |||
| :you only linked reviews that are overwhelmingly negative and none of which pointed out the lies, flaws and dangerous liable that the film is soaked in. | |||
| :tried to add one VERY important review, by alexa obrien. you not only deleted my entries but did not retain the obrien article. write it in there yourself if you want. but dont make out like this entry is unbias.it is not. at all. | |||
| ''(replied to and moved to ])'' | |||
| :and you did include bias in your own editorial as well..it wasnt just the terrible, establishment-stroking reviews. | |||
| == HWOF == | |||
| :this film is a menace to investigative journalism, to whistleblowers and to WL, Assange & Manning. if you are not being paid to manipulate this entry, and are doing it off your own back, with no vested interest, then you really are terribly misinformed. but i dont think you're ignorant of the real problems with this film, or with the bias in your entry, i think you are well aware. which makes it worse. hence the abruptness. this isn't about a wikipedia entry, this is about truth, justice & integrity. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{Talkback|DoctorJoeE}} | |||
| ::Having never before contributed to the article, I simply reverted to the last sourced version which existed before your series of edits. Please review ]. What is not helpful in civil discussion, is your calling Lexein a nasty name by writing "''stop being a cunt''". Read ]. What is entirely inappropriate is in a fit of pique to delete sourced content from the article and replace the content with rants toward another editor. Read ]. That is NOT how we do it here. When two editors disagree, they begin as calm a discussion as possible, or seek a neutral third party to intercede. If you feel the article is negatively slanted per ], go to the article's talk page and discuss. Seek a compromise. If most reliable sources give criticism of the film, it IS proper to note atoverwhelming poor acceptance by those critics, even if you feel it is too much negativity. ] means we do not offer our personal opinions, but simply report what was written by others elsewhere. . ''']''' '']'' 07:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Stale RX Request == | ||
| {{You've got mail}} | |||
| I am not sure how closely you read the article you reverted - but the current (reverted) version now cites "The Journatic Journal" as its primary source. The version I updated took it out of that (essentially) Journatic-authored state (look at the citations) - "^ a b c d e f Joyce Cunningham, "The Survival of the Newspaper Business", The Journatic Journal, Accessed 18 Apr 2013)" I posted about these changes before I made them over a month ago. Nobody seemed interested in discussing them. At this point, if it is repetitive, then it makes more sense to edit rather than to revert to something essentially authored by Journatic themselves (which is original research and self promotion). I don't think Poynter is being "obsessive" because they wrote 10+ articles on the issue (as did the Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Tribune). So, I am not sure where you saw original research. It was all cited. It's not my opinion that this company was involved in a number of scandals. All of the articles cited on the top of the Talk page (repetitive or not) clearly define the scandal...which actually is a big part of their short life as a company. If the articles on enron, anderson consulting, lehman brothers, anglo irish bank, bernie madoff have sections on malfeasance / scandal - why shouldn't journatic? So, which is more encyclopedic - citing the "Journatic Journal" or the Chicago Tribune, Poynter, Crains Chicago Business, Chicago Sun-times, etc...? Anyway, the point is that the baseline article that should be edited is my last version (and whatever is repetitive can be removed)...not the one written by / citing Journatic, which is not much more than self promotion. I do not want to revert again because of the "three revert rule" - but the current version is not encyclopedic at all. It's just journatic's PR material retyped. ] (]) 00:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:46, 28 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Lexein has not edited Misplaced Pages since 12 April 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| This is Lexein's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
Inactive Editor Due to life interceding, I have been inconvenienced and so, unfortunately, has Misplaced Pages. Hope Misplaced Pages can withstand my absence,
Any edits performed by me will be infrequent and random, as a result. Cheers,
Lexein Fishette
Hello, welcome to my talk page!
- Please write in a new section at the bottom of this page.
- Please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~.
- (Don't bold first words - they will be unbolded at my discretion.)
- I will reply here.
- If I comment on your talk page, please respond there. I watch my watchlist, and I don't bother with {{Talkback}} or pingponging, so don't you bother.
Thank you!
Start a new Talk section.
- Heirarchy of Disagreement
See that pyramid on the right? I actually _do_ prefer to stay in the top tiers. Unfortunately, the pyramid assumes that all actors are discussing in good faith, stating true facts, and not misrepresenting others' words. I'm afraid these do not hold true for deletionists and trolls, who choose to bend the language, meaning, and spirit of policy, and even outright lie, to achieve maximum destruction, and maximum disturbance to the encyclopedia project. So the reader will find me stepping off the pyramid from time to time to sternly deal with raging deletionist and troll behavior. Sorry if this is upsetting, but please see WP:DUCK and WP:SPADE for more on opening one's eyes and seeing the facts before one. --Lexein
SmackBot
- <grin> Think of it as the smack at the end of a Swedish massage, or the smack of a Homer like pate when saying Doh! Whatever makes you comfortable... The name was never intended as a reprimand, although some users have taken it as such, just a passing pun. Regards Rich Farmbrough, 07:39 6 April 2007 (GMT).
SubRip
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stash
Screencap of a prior edit which has been copied to a userspace page, so that links can be shown.
TUSC token c07f8068a22fa9d8a75e59ccfa3b3dc2
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
ThrashIRC
(Moved to Talk:Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients)
Maybe not so bad after all...
ENeville has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Nom nom nom
Yunshui has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Holiday cheer
|
Holiday Cheer | |
| Michael Q. Schmidt is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. |
New messages
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
References to support personal opinions?
(replied to and moved to WT:Paid editing (essay))
HWOF
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stale RX Request
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Categories: