Misplaced Pages

Commonwealth of Nations membership criteria: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:20, 12 June 2013 editChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,561 edits Rv the massive expansion of Somaliland detail. It already notes the succession was unilateral and without recognition. Outside of details regarding the Commonwealth, this article gives only the shortest of summaries← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:56, 30 July 2024 edit undoWkcheang (talk | contribs)195 editsmNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
(474 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Rules for joining the political association of mostly former British colonies}}
{{Use British English|date=March 2011}}{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2012}}
{{Use British English|date=March 2011}}{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}}
] currently has 54 members.
{{Legend|blue|member states}}
{{Legend|orange|suspended member states}}
{{Legend|red|former member states}}
{{Legend|green|sovereign states and their territories with historical links to the United Kingdom}}]]


] currently has 56 member states.
'''Commonwealth of Nations membership criteria''' are the corpus of requirements that members and prospective members must meet to be allowed to participate in the ]. The criteria have been altered by a series of documents issued over the past seventy-five years.
{{Legend|#000081|Member States}}
{{Legend|#F57A00|Former Member States}}
{{Legend|#00ffff|] and ]}}]]


The criteria for membership in the ], which apply to current and prospective member states, have been altered by a series of documents issued over the past eighty-two years.
The most important of these documents were the ] (1931), the ] (1949), the ] (1971), the ] (1991), the ] (1995), the ] (1997), and the ] (2007). New members of the Commonwealth must abide by certain criteria that arose from these documents, the most important of which are the Harare principles and the Edinburgh criteria.


The most important of these documents were the ] (1931), the ] (1949), the ] (1971), the ] (1991), the ] (1995), the ] (1997), and the ] (2007). New member states of the Commonwealth must abide by certain criteria that arose from these documents, the most important of which are the Harare principles and the Edinburgh criteria.
The Harare principles require all members of the Commonwealth, old and new, to abide by certain political principles, including democracy and respect for human rights. These can be enforced upon current members, who may be suspended or expelled for failure to abide by them. To date, ], ], ], and ] have been suspended on these grounds; Zimbabwe later withdrew.


The Harare principles require all member states of the Commonwealth, old and new, to abide by certain political principles, including democracy and respect for human rights. These can be enforced upon current members, who may be suspended or expelled for failure to abide by them. To date, ], ], ], and ] have been suspended on these grounds; Zimbabwe later withdrew.
The foremost of the Edinburgh criteria requires new members to have either constitutional or administrative ties to at least one current member of the Commonwealth of Nations. Traditionally, new Commonwealth members had ties to the ]. The Edinburgh criteria arose from the 1995 accession of ], at the time the only member that was never part of the ] (in whole or part). The Edinburgh criteria have been reviewed, and were revised at the ], allowing the admission of ] at the ].<ref name="Membership">{{cite news| url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/the-big-question-what-is-the-commonwealths-role-and-is-it-relevant-to-global-politics-1827478.html | location=London | work=The Independent | first=Daniel | last=Howden | title=The Big Question: What is the Commonwealth's role, and is it relevant to global politics? | date=26 November 2009}}</ref>

The foremost of the Edinburgh criteria requires new member states to have either constitutional or administrative ties to at least one current member state of the Commonwealth of Nations. Traditionally, new Commonwealth member states had ties to the ]. The Edinburgh criteria arose from the 1995 accession of ], at the time the only member state that was never part of the ] (in whole or part). The Edinburgh criteria have been reviewed, and were revised at the ], allowing the admission of ] at the ].<ref name="Membership">{{cite news| url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/the-big-question-what-is-the-commonwealths-role-and-is-it-relevant-to-global-politics-1827478.html | location=London | work=The Independent | first=Daniel | last=Howden | title=The Big Question: What is the Commonwealth's role, and is it relevant to global politics? | date=26 November 2009}}</ref>


==History== ==History==

===Founding documents=== ===Founding documents===

], the author of the ] formula that laid out embryonic membership criteria.]] ], the author of the ] formula that laid out embryonic membership criteria.]]
The formation of the Commonwealth of Nations is dated back to the ], an ] of the ] passed on 11 December 1931. The Statute established the independence of the ]s, creating a group of equal members where, previously, there was one (the United Kingdom) paramount. The solitary condition of membership of the embryonic Commonwealth was that a state be a Dominion. Thus, the independence of ] (1947), ] (1947), and ] (1948) saw the three countries join the Commonwealth as independent monarchies; on the other hand, ] (1948) and ] (1948) did not join the Commonwealth, as they chose to become republics. The membership of Ireland lapsed when it unambiguously became a republic in 1949.<ref>Ireland's status was ].</ref>


The formation of the Commonwealth of Nations is dated back to the ], an ] of the ] passed on 11 December 1931. The Statute established the independence of the ]s, creating a group of equal members where, previously, there was one (the United Kingdom) paramount. The solitary condition of membership of the embryonic Commonwealth was that a state be a Dominion. Thus, the independence of ] (1947), ] (1947), and the ] (now ]) (1948) saw the three countries join the Commonwealth as independent states that retained the King as head of state. On the other hand, ] (1948) and ] (1948) did not join the Commonwealth, as they chose to become republics. In 1949, the Commonwealth chose to regard ] as no longer being a member when Ireland repealed the ] under which the King had played a role in its diplomatic relations with other states, although the Irish government's view was that Ireland had not been a member for some years.<ref>Ireland's status was a ].</ref>
With ] on the verge of promulgating a ], the 1949 ] was dominated by the impending departure of over half of the Commonwealth's population. To avoid such a fate, ] ] ] proposed that republics be allowed to remain in the Commonwealth, provided that they recognise ] as ']'. Known as the ], this agreement thus established the only formalised rule as being that members must recognise the Head of the Commonwealth. The arrangement prompted suggestions that other countries, such as ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1990795,00.html |title=France and UK considered 1950s 'merger' |accessdate=22 July 2007 |date=15 January 2007 |publisher=] | location=London}}</ref> ], and ],<ref>{{no icon}} {{cite web|url=http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kommentarer/article1142355.ece |title=Kongebesøk i øyriket |accessdate=15 December 2008 |date=26 October 2005 |publisher=] |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070310183807/http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kommentarer/article1142355.ece |archivedate = 10 March 2007}}</ref> join. However, until ] joined in 1970, only recently independent countries would accede.

With India on the verge of promulgating a ], the 1949 ] was dominated by the impending departure of over half of the Commonwealth's population. To avoid such a fate, ] ] ] proposed that republics be allowed to remain in the Commonwealth, provided that they recognise ] as ']'. Known as the ], this agreement thus established the only formalised rule as being that members must recognise the Head of the Commonwealth. The arrangement prompted suggestions that other countries, such as ],<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk_news/story/0,,1990795,00.html |title=France and UK considered 1950s 'merger' |accessdate=22 July 2007 |date=15 January 2007 |publisher=] | location=London}}</ref> Israel, and ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kommentarer/article1142355.ece |title=Kongebesøk i øyriket |accessdate=15 December 2008 |date=26 October 2005 |publisher=] |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070310183807/http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kommentarer/article1142355.ece |archivedate = 10 March 2007|language=no}}</ref> join. However, until ] joined in 1970, only recently independent countries would accede.


===Singapore Declaration=== ===Singapore Declaration===

{{Main|Singapore Declaration}} {{Main|Singapore Declaration}}

The first statement of the political values of the ] was issued at the 1961 conference, at which the members declared that ] would be one of the cornerstones of the new Commonwealth, at a time when the organisation's ranks were being swelled by new African and Caribbean members. The immediate result of this was the withdrawal of ]'s re-application, which it was required to lodge before becoming a republic, as its government's ] policies clearly contradicted the principle. The first statement of the political values of the ] was issued at the 1961 conference, at which the members declared that ] would be one of the cornerstones of the new Commonwealth, at a time when the organisation's ranks were being swelled by new African and Caribbean members. The immediate result of this was the withdrawal of ]'s re-application, which it was required to lodge before becoming a republic, as its government's ] policies clearly contradicted the principle.


Further political values and principles of the Commonwealth were affirmed in ] on 22 January 1971, at the first ] (CHOGM). The fourteen points clarified the political freedom of its members, and dictated the core principles of the Commonwealth: ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/32987/singapore_declaration_of_commonwealth_principles/ |title=Singapore Declaration of Commonwealth Principles 1971 |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=22 January 1971 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref> However, neither the terms nor the spirit of the Declaration were binding, and several openly flouted it; despite little conformity, only ] was ever expelled for breaching these tenets (on 15 October 1987, following the ]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=140761 |title=Fiji Rejoins the Commonwealth |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=30 September 1997 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref> Further political values and principles of the Commonwealth were affirmed in ] on 22 January 1971, at the first ] (CHOGM). The fourteen points clarified the political freedom of its members, and dictated the core principles of the Commonwealth: ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/32987/singapore_declaration_of_commonwealth_principles/ |title=Singapore Declaration of Commonwealth Principles 1971 |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=22 January 1971 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080511174313/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/32987/singapore_declaration_of_commonwealth_principles/ |archivedate=11 May 2008}}</ref> However, neither the terms nor the spirit of the Declaration were binding, and several openly flouted it; despite little conformity, only ] was ever expelled for breaching these tenets (on 15 October 1987, following the ]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=140761 |title=Fiji Rejoins the Commonwealth |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=30 September 1997 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20041101052757/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=140761 |archivedate=1 November 2004}}</ref>


===Harare Declaration=== ===Harare Declaration===

{{Main|Harare Declaration}} {{Main|Harare Declaration}}

The Harare Declaration, issued on 20 October 1991 in ], ], reaffirmed the principles laid out in Singapore, particularly in the light of the ongoing dismantling of apartheid in ]. The Declaration put emphasis on human rights and democracy by detailing these principles once more: The Harare Declaration, issued on 20 October 1991 in ], ], reaffirmed the principles laid out in Singapore, particularly in the light of the ongoing dismantling of apartheid in ]. The Declaration put emphasis on human rights and democracy by detailing these principles once more:
{{cquote| {{quote|
*We believe that international peace and order, global economic development and the rule of international law are essential to the security and prosperity of mankind; *We believe that international peace and order, global economic development and the rule of international law are essential to the security and prosperity of mankind;
*We believe in the liberty of the individual under the law, in equal rights for all citizens regardless of gender, race, colour, creed or political belief, and in the individual's inalienable right to participate by means of free and democratic political processes in framing the society in which he or she lives; *We believe in the liberty of the individual under the law, in equal rights for all citizens regardless of gender, race, colour, creed or political belief, and in the individual's inalienable right to participate by means of free and democratic political processes in framing the society in which he or she lives;
*We recognise racial prejudice and intolerance as a dangerous sickness and a threat to healthy development, and racial discrimination as an unmitigated evil; *We recognise racial prejudice and intolerance as a dangerous sickness and a threat to healthy development, and racial discrimination as an unmitigated evil;
*We oppose all forms of racial oppression, and we are committed to the principles of human dignity and equality; *We oppose all forms of racial oppression, and we are committed to the principles of human dignity and equality;
*We recognise the importance and urgency of economic and social development to satisfy the basic needs and aspirations of the vast majority of the peoples of the world, and seek the progressive removal of the wide disparities in living standards amongst our members.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/34457/harare_commonwealth_declaration/ |title=Harare Commonwealth Declaration, 1991 |accessdate=2006-09-16 |date=1991-10-20 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref>}} *We recognise the importance and urgency of economic and social development to satisfy the basic needs and aspirations of the vast majority of the peoples of the world, and seek the progressive removal of the wide disparities in living standards amongst our members.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/34457/harare_commonwealth_declaration/ |title=Harare Commonwealth Declaration, 1991 |accessdate=2006-09-16 |date=1991-10-20 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060930064939/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/34457/harare_commonwealth_declaration/ |archive-date=30 September 2006 |url-status=dead }}</ref>}}

In 2002, Zimbabwe was suspended for breaching the Harare Declaration. Subsequently, when the Commonwealth refused to lift the suspension, Zimbabwe withdrew from the Commonwealth in 2003.


===Millbrook Programme=== ===Millbrook Programme===

{{Main|Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme}} {{Main|Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme}}
The ], issued on 12 November 1995 at the ], near ], ], clarified the Commonwealth's position on the Harare Declaration. The document introduced compulsion upon its members, with strict guidelines to be followed in the event of breaching its rules, including (but not limited to) expulsion from the Commonwealth. Adjudication was left to the newly created ] (CMAG).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/34458/the_millbrook_commonwealth_action_programme/ |title=The Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme on the Harare Declaration, 1995 |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=12 November 1995 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref>


At the same CHOGM, the Programme was enforced for the first time, as ] was suspended. On 19 December 1995, the CMAG found that the suspension was in line with the Programme, and also declared its intent on enforcing the Programme in other cases (particularly ] and ]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/34582/141671/first_meeting_of_the_commonwealth_ministerial_acti.htm |title=First Meeting of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group on the Harare Declaration |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=20 December 1995 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref> On 29 May 1999, the day after the inauguration of Nigeria's first democratically elected ] since the end of military rule, ], the country's suspension was lifted, on the advice of the CMAG.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/34582/34766/nigeria_resumes_full_commonwealth_membership.htm |title=Nigeria Resumes Full Commonwealth Membership |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=18 May 1999 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref> The ], issued on 12 November 1995 at the ], near ], ], clarified the Commonwealth's position on the Harare Declaration. The document introduced compulsion upon its members, with strict guidelines to be followed in the event of breaching its rules. These included but were not limited to expulsion from the Commonwealth. Adjudication was left to the newly created ] (CMAG).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/34458/the_millbrook_commonwealth_action_programme/ |title=The Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme on the Harare Declaration, 1995 |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=12 November 1995 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060930070206/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/20723/34458/the_millbrook_commonwealth_action_programme/ |archive-date=30 September 2006 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

At the same CHOGM, the Programme was enforced for the first time, as ] was suspended. On 19 December 1995, the CMAG found that the suspension was in line with the Programme, and also declared its intent on enforcing the Programme in other cases (particularly ] and ]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/34582/141671/first_meeting_of_the_commonwealth_ministerial_acti.htm |title=First Meeting of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group on the Harare Declaration |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=20 December 1995 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021844/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/34582/141671/first_meeting_of_the_commonwealth_ministerial_acti.htm |archive-date=27 September 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref> On 29 May 1999, the day after the inauguration of Nigeria's first democratically elected ] since the end of military rule, ], the country's suspension was lifted, on the advice of the CMAG.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/34582/34766/nigeria_resumes_full_commonwealth_membership.htm |title=Nigeria Resumes Full Commonwealth Membership |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=18 May 1999 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021620/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/34582/34766/nigeria_resumes_full_commonwealth_membership.htm |archive-date=27 September 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
<!--More to be added on Pakistan, Fiji, and Zimbabwe--> <!--More to be added on Pakistan, Fiji, and Zimbabwe-->


===Edinburgh criteria=== ===Edinburgh criteria===

{{Main|Edinburgh Declaration}} {{Main|Edinburgh Declaration}}
In 1995, ] joined the Commonwealth, becoming the first member to have never had a constitutional link with the United Kingdom or another Commonwealth member. Concerns that this would allow open-ended expansion of the Commonwealth and dilute its historic ties prompted the 1995 CHOGM to launch the ''Inter-Governmental Group on Criteria for Commonwealth Membership'', to report at the 1997 CHOGM, to be held in ], Scotland. The group decided that, in future, new members would be limited to those with ]al association with an existing Commonwealth member.<ref name="Edinburgh Commique, 1997">{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=33629 |title=Edinburgh Communique, 1997 |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=27 October 1997 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref>


In 1995, ], formerly a ], joined the Commonwealth, becoming the first member state to have never had a constitutional link with the United Kingdom. Concerns that this would allow open-ended expansion of the Commonwealth and dilute its historic ties prompted the 1995 CHOGM to launch the ''Inter-Governmental Group on Criteria for Commonwealth Membership'', to report at the 1997 CHOGM, to be held in ], Scotland. The group decided that, in future, new member states would be limited to those with ]al association with an existing Commonwealth member state.<ref name="Edinburgh Commique, 1997">{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=33629 |title=Edinburgh Communique, 1997 |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=27 October 1997 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021829/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=33629 |archivedate=27 September 2007}}</ref>
In addition to this new rule, the former rules were consolidated into a single document. They had been prepared for the High Level Appraisal Group set up at the ], but not publicly announced until 1997.<ref name="The Expansion of the Commonwealth">{{cite journal |last=McIntyre |first=W. David |authorlink=W. David McIntyre |year=2008 |month=April |title=The Expansion of the Commonwealth and the Criteria for Membership |journal=] |volume=97 |issue=395 |pages=273–85 |doi=10.1080/00358530801962089 |accessdate=19 December 2008 |quote= }}</ref> These requirements, which remain the same today, are that members must:

In addition to this new rule, the former rules were consolidated into a single document. They had been prepared for the High Level Appraisal Group set up at the ], but not publicly announced until 1997.<ref name="The Expansion of the Commonwealth">{{cite journal |last=McIntyre |first=W. David |authorlink=W. David McIntyre |date=April 2008 |title=The Expansion of the Commonwealth and the Criteria for Membership |journal=] |volume=97 |issue=395 |pages=273–85 |doi=10.1080/00358530801962089}}</ref> These requirements, which remain the same today, are that members must:
*accept and comply with the Harare principles. *accept and comply with the Harare principles.
*be fully ]. *be fully independent ].
*recognise the monarch of the ]s as the Head of the Commonwealth.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Collinge |first=John |year=1996 |month=July |title=Criteria for Commonwealth Membership |journal=] |volume=85 |issue=339 |pages=279–86 |doi=10.1080/00358539608454314 |accessdate=6 December 2009 |quote= }}</ref> *recognise King Charles III as the Head of the Commonwealth.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Collinge |first=John |date=July 1996 |title=Criteria for Commonwealth Membership |journal=] |volume=85 |issue=339 |pages=279–86 |doi=10.1080/00358539608454314}}</ref>
*accept the ] as the means of Commonwealth communication. *accept the ] as the means of Commonwealth communication.
*respect the wishes of the general population ''vis-à-vis'' Commonwealth membership.<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth">{{cite web|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110723140846/http://www.cpsu.org.uk/fileadmin/Gov_and_Demo/Widening_vs_Deepening.doc|title=The future of the modern Commonwealth: Widening vs. deepening? |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=10 October 2005 |format=doc |first=Victoria |last=te Velde-Ashworth |publisher=Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit }}</ref> *respect the wishes of the general population ''vis-à-vis'' Commonwealth membership.<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth">{{cite web|url=http://www.cpsu.org.uk/fileadmin/Gov_and_Demo/Widening_vs_Deepening.doc |title=The future of the modern Commonwealth: Widening vs. deepening? |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=10 October 2005 |format=doc |first=Victoria |last=te Velde-Ashworth |publisher=Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723140846/http://www.cpsu.org.uk/fileadmin/Gov_and_Demo/Widening_vs_Deepening.doc |archivedate=23 July 2011 }}</ref>


===Kampala review=== ===Kampala review===
On the advice of ] ], the ], held in ], ], decided to re-examine the Edinburgh criteria. The ] reported at the ], held in ], ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/document/147565/chogm_2005_final_communiqu.htm |title=2005 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting: Final Communiqué |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=27 November 2005 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat }}</ref> According to Don McKinnon, the members of the Commonwealth decided in principle to expand the membership of the organisation to include countries without linkages to the Commonwealth, but Eduardo del Buey stated that it would still take some time until the criteria are reformed. Outstanding applications as of the 2007 meeting included former Belgian colony ] (application submitted in 2003 and approved in 2009), the former French colonies of ] and ], and the former British colony of ] and ] of ].<ref>{{cite news | last = Osike | first = Felix | title = Rwanda membership delayed | url = http://www.sundayvision.co.ug/detail.php?mainNewsCategoryId=7&newsCategoryId=123&newsId=598876 | work = ] | date = 24 November 2007 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref>


On the advice of ] ], the ], held in ], ], decided to re-examine the Edinburgh criteria. The ] reported at the ], held in ], ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thecommonwealth.org/document/147565/chogm_2005_final_communiqu.htm |title=2005 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting: Final Communiqué |accessdate=16 September 2006 |date=27 November 2005 |publisher=Commonwealth Secretariat |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927022804/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/document/147565/chogm_2005_final_communiqu.htm |archivedate=27 September 2007}}</ref> According to Don McKinnon, the members of the Commonwealth decided in principle to expand the membership of the organisation to include countries without linkages to the Commonwealth, but Eduardo del Buey stated that it would still take some time until the criteria are reformed. Outstanding applications as of the 2007 meeting included former Belgian colony ] (application submitted in 2003 and approved in 2009), the former French colonies of ] and ], and the former British colony of ] and ] of ].<ref>{{cite news | last = Osike | first = Felix | title = Rwanda membership delayed | url = http://www.sundayvision.co.ug/detail.php?mainNewsCategoryId=7&newsCategoryId=123&newsId=598876 | work = ] | date = 24 November 2007 | accessdate = 29 November 2009 | url-status = dead | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20130123172352/http://www.sundayvision.co.ug/detail.php?mainNewsCategoryId=7&newsCategoryId=123&newsId=598876 | archivedate = 23 January 2013}}</ref>
The revised requirements stated that:<ref></ref>


The revised requirements stated that:<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516124840/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/document/34293/35232/152035/173044/chogm2007finalcommunique.htm |date=16 May 2008 }}</ref>
:*(a) an applicant country should, as a general rule, have had a historic constitutional association with an existing Commonwealth member, save in exceptional circumstances;

:*(a) an applicant country should, as a general rule, have had a historic constitutional association with an existing Commonwealth member state, save in exceptional circumstances;
:*(b) in exceptional circumstances, applications should be considered on a case-by-case basis; :*(b) in exceptional circumstances, applications should be considered on a case-by-case basis;
:*(c) an applicant country should accept and comply with Commonwealth fundamental values, principles, and priorities as set out in the ] and contained in other subsequent Declarations; :*(c) an applicant country should accept and comply with Commonwealth fundamental values, principles, and priorities as set out in the ] and contained in other subsequent Declarations;
:*(d) an applicant country must demonstrate commitment to: democracy and democratic processes, including free and fair elections and representative legislatures; the rule of law and independence of the judiciary; good governance, including a well-trained public service and transparent public accounts; and protection of human rights, freedom of expression, and equality of opportunity; :*(d) an applicant country must demonstrate commitment to: democracy and democratic processes, including free and fair elections and representative legislatures; the rule of law and independence of the judiciary; good governance, including a well-trained public service and transparent public accounts; and protection of human rights, freedom of expression, and equality of opportunity;
:*(e) an applicant country should accept Commonwealth norms and conventions, such as the use of the English language as the medium of inter-Commonwealth relations, and acknowledge Queen Elizabeth II as the Head of the Commonwealth; and :*(e) an applicant country should accept Commonwealth norms and conventions, such as the use of the English language as the medium of inter-Commonwealth relations, and acknowledge Queen Elizabeth II as the Head of the Commonwealth; and
:*(f) new members should be encouraged to join the ], and to promote vigorous civil society and business organisations within their countries, and to foster participatory democracy through regular civil society consultations :*(f) new member states should be encouraged to join the ], and to promote vigorous civil society and business organisations within their countries, and to foster participatory democracy through regular civil society consultations


] became the 54th nation to join the Commonwealth at the ]. It became the second country (after Mozambique) not to have any historical ties with the United Kingdom. Rwanda had been a colony of Germany in the 19th century and of Belgium for the first half of the 20th century.<ref name="NYT admission">{{cite news | last = Kron | first = Josh | title = Rwanda Joins British Commonwealth | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/world/africa/29rwanda.html | work = ] | date = 28 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> Later ] were severed during the 1994 ]. President ] also accused it of supporting the killings and expelled a number of French organisations from the country.<ref name="BBC 2006">{{cite news | title = Rwanda seeks to join Commonwealth | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6200027.stm | date = 21 December 2006 | accessdate =29 November 2009 | work=BBC News}}</ref> In recent years, English has replaced French as the official language in parts of Rwanda.<ref>{{cite news | last = Ross | first = Will | title = What would the Commonwealth do for Rwanda? | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8382676.stm | publisher = ] | date = 27 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> ] ] stated that Rwanda's application "was boosted by its commitment towards democracy as well as the values espoused by the Commonwealth".<ref>{{cite news | last1 = Muin | first1 = Abdul | last2 = Majid | first2 = Abdul | title = Commonwealth Accepts Rwanda's Membership Bid | url = http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=458567 | publisher = ] | date = 29 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> Consideration for its admission was also seen as an "exceptional circumstance" by the ].<ref name="New Times">{{cite news | title = Rwanda: Joining the Commonwealth | url = http://allafrica.com/stories/200911270058.html | work = ] | publisher = AllAfrica | date = 27 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> ] became the 54th nation to join the Commonwealth at the ]. It became the second country (after Mozambique) not to have any historical ties with the United Kingdom. Rwanda had been a ] in the 19th century and ] for the first half of the 20th century.<ref name="NYT admission">{{cite news | last = Kron | first = Josh | title = Rwanda Joins Commonwealth | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/world/africa/29rwanda.html | work = ] | date = 28 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> Later ] were severed during the 1994 ]. President ] also accused it of supporting the killings and expelled a number of French organisations from the country.<ref name="BBC 2006">{{cite news | title = Rwanda seeks to join Commonwealth | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6200027.stm | date = 21 December 2006 | accessdate =29 November 2009 | work=BBC News}}</ref> Since the end of the genocide, English has increased in use.<ref>{{cite news | last = Ross | first = Will | title = What would the Commonwealth do for Rwanda? | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8382676.stm | publisher = BBC News | date = 27 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> ] ] stated that Rwanda's application "was boosted by its commitment towards democracy as well as the values espoused by the Commonwealth".<ref>{{cite news | last1 = Muin | first1 = Abdul | last2 = Majid | first2 = Abdul | title = Commonwealth Accepts Rwanda's Membership Bid | url = http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=458567 | publisher = ]| date = 29 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref> Consideration for its admission was also seen as an "exceptional circumstance" by the ].<ref name="New Times">{{cite news | title = Rwanda: Joining the Commonwealth | url = http://allafrica.com/stories/200911270058.html | work = ] | publisher = AllAfrica | date = 27 November 2009 | accessdate =29 November 2009}}</ref>


Rwanda was admitted despite the ] (CHRI) finding that "the state of governance and human rights in Rwanda does not satisfy Commonwealth standards”, and that it “does not therefore qualify for admission".<ref name=chri>{{Cite web|url=https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/download/Rwanda%20application%20for%20membership.pdf|title=Rwanda’s application for membership, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative|access-date=27 July 2021}}</ref> CHRI also commented that: "It does not make sense to admit a state that already does not satisfy Commonwealth standards. This would tarnish the reputation of the Commonwealth and confirm the opinion of many people and civic organisations that the leaders of its governments do not really care for democracy and human rights, and that its periodic, solemn declarations are merely hot air."<ref name=chri/>
==Prospective members==
]}}
{{Legend|#0080FF|Commonwealth of Nations member state ]}}
{{Legend|#FF8040|Applied or interested non-member states, some of them without historic constitutional association}}
{{Legend|#008000|Non-member states that were ]s, ], ] or under some other type of ]}}]]


Both CHRI<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/sitesearch?submit=submit&q=Rwanda|title=Rwanda, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative|access-date=27 July 2021}}</ref> and ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/africa/rwanda|title=Human Rights Watch, Rwanda country page|access-date=27 July 2021}}</ref> have found that respect for democracy and human rights in Rwanda has declined since the country joined the Commonwealth.
===Eligible states===
The following states would be eligible under the Edinburgh criteria (but not necessarily under the Harare criteria):
*{{flag|Afghanistan}}:<ref name="Atlas of the British Empire"> </ref> British protectorate or other control for much of 1823 to 1919.
*{{flag|Bahrain}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth"/> British protectorate until 1971.
*{{flag|Myanmar}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> British Colony until 1948.
*{{flag|Egypt}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> British protectorate until 1922; English commonly used as a language of instruction and administration.
*{{flag|Eritrea}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> administered by Britain under ] until 1951.
*{{flag|Hong Kong}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> British Colony until 1997.
*{{flag|Iraq}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> ] until 1932.
*{{flag|Ireland}}:<ref>{{cite journal |last=Mole |first=Stuart |year=1998 |month=July |title=Issues of Commonwealth membership |journal=] |volume=87 |issue=347 |pages=307–12 |doi=10.1080/00358539808454426 |accessdate=19 December 2008 |quote= }}</ref> ] with England, then Scotland and England, later Great Britain and later the United Kingdom from 1177 to 1949; ] with the parliament of England and later Great Britain from 1494 to 1782; a part of the ] from 1801 to 1922; and a British Dominion from 1922 to 1937. Ireland was formerly a member of the Commonwealth, but its membership terminated when it declared itself a republic in 1949, prior to the ], which allowed republics to remain in the Commonwealth.
*{{flag|Israel}}:<ref name="BBC 2006"/><ref name="Israel and Palestine could join Commonwealth"></ref> part of the ] until 1948. Israel's eligibility was declared in 2006 by the Commonwealth secretary-general.<ref name="Israel and Palestine could join Commonwealth"/>
*{{flag|Jordan}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> part of the British Mandate of Palestine 1920–1921; protectorate 1921–1946.
*{{flag|Kuwait}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> British protectorate until 1961.
*{{flag|Libya}}: ] and ] in Libya were ] until 1951.
*{{flag|Oman}}: British protectorate of Muscat & Oman until 1971.
*{{flag|Qatar}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> British protectorate until 1971.
*{{flag|Somalia}}: Following World War II, Britain retained control of both ] and ] as protectorates.
*{{flag|South Sudan}}:<ref></ref> part of Anglo-Egyptian ] until 1956. (South Sudan has applied to join the Commonwealth.)<ref></ref>
*{{flag|Sudan}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> Anglo-Egyptian ] until 1956. (Sudan has applied to join the Commonwealth.)<ref name="Membership" />
*{{flag|Suriname}}:<ref name="Suriname plans to join the Commonwealth"></ref> English colony of ] from 1650 to 1667 and controlled by the British from 1799 to 1816. In 2012 Suriname expressed plans to join the Commonwealth<ref name="Suriname eyeing membership of Commonwealth"></ref> and the British government has made it a priority to provide guidance to Suriname in applying for Commonwealth membership<ref name="Providing guidance"></ref>
*{{flag|United Arab Emirates}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> seven British protectorates, known collectively as the ], until 1971.
*{{flag|United States}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> the original ], most US territory east of the ], much of the former ], and the former ] were all under British control until various dates ranging from 1776 to 1846.
*{{flag|Yemen}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> ] was a British colony (]) and British protectorates (] and the states, apart from Aden, in the ]) until 1967. (Yemen has applied to join the Commonwealth).<ref name="BBC 2006"/>
*{{flag|Zimbabwe}}:<ref name="The Expansion of the Commonwealth" /> member of the Commonwealth until 2003.


== References ==
===Secessionist movements and other territories===
<!-- Per WP:CRYSTAL, Please do not add any entity to this list without also including a reliable source that directly discusses the possibility of the entity concerned gaining independent Commonwealth membership -->
There are several secessionist movements and other sub-national territories that, were they to gain independence, would be eligible to join the Commonwealth. The following countries and territories would be eligible under the Edinburgh criteria (but not necessarily Harare) and have either expressed interest in joining or been considered for entry:
*{{flag|Southern Cameroons}}: Former British controlled part of and now joined with the former French ruled ].
*]:<ref>, Quote:Making Northern Ireland "an independent state within the Commonwealth" was also under active consideration.</ref> ] of the ], a member since the Commonwealth's foundation.
*{{flag|Quebec}}:<ref>{{cite news |first=John F. |last=Burns |authorlink=John F. Burns |title=Montreal Journal; A Sovereign Quebec, He Says, Needn't Be Separe |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/21/world/montreal-journal-a-sovereign-quebec-he-says-needn-t-be-separe.html |publisher=] |date=21 February 1992 |accessdate=21 June 2009|quote= has even suggested that a sovereign Quebec might join the Commonwealth, the group of nations that were formerly British colonies.}}</ref> province of ], a member since the Commonwealth's foundation.
*{{flag|Scotland}}:<ref>, quote:Scotland would also be able to play a role in other global groups such as...the Commonwealth</ref> ] of the ], a member since the Commonwealth's foundation.
*{{flag|Wales}}:<ref>, quote:Plaid has a long-term ambition for an independent Wales within the EU</ref> ] of the ], a member since the Commonwealth's foundation.
*]:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth"/><!--quote=the following countries and nations, to varying degrees, have all expressed an interest in membership...Irian (West Papuan).--> ]n territory of ] island, which claims constitutional links with ].</center>
*] (], ], and ]): While their constitutional status bears some resemblance to that of the ], the Crown dependencies are not members of the ]. They participate in the Commonwealth of Nations by virtue of their association with the United Kingdom, and participate in various Commonwealth institutions in their own right. For example, all three participate in the ] and the ]. All three Crown dependencies regard the existing situation as unsatisfactory and have lobbied for change. The ] have called on the UK Foreign Secretary to request that the ] "consider granting associate membership to Jersey and the other Crown Dependencies as well as any other territories at a similarly advanced stage of autonomy". Jersey has proposed that it be accorded "self-representation in all Commonwealth meetings; full participation in debates and procedures, with a right to speak where relevant and the opportunity to enter into discussions with those who are full members; and no right to vote in the Ministerial or Heads of Government meetings, which is reserved for full members".<ref>{{cite web|title=Written evidence from States of Jersey|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmfaff/114/114we22.htm|publisher=Chief Minister of Jersey|accessdate=18 March 2013}}</ref> The ] and the ] have made calls of a similar nature for a more integrated relationship with the Commonwealth,<ref>{{cite web|title=The role and future of the Commonwealth|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmfaff/114/11410.htm|publisher=House of Commons|accessdate=18 March 2013}}</ref> including more direct representation and enhanced participation in Commonwealth organisations and meetings, including ]s.<ref>{{cite web|title=Written evidence from the States of Guernsey|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmfaff/114/114we18.htm|publisher=Policy Council of Guernsey|accessdate=18 March 2013}}</ref>
*{{flag|Somaliland}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth"/><!--quote=the following countries and nations, to varying degrees, have all expressed an interest in membership...Somaliland--> former British protectorate until 1960 when it joined ], has unilaterally seceded from Somalia but has yet to receive international recognition. Somaliland is not a member of the UN, but has applied to join the Commonwealth under ].<ref>http://www.qarannews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6381&Itemid=59</ref>


{{Reflist}}
===Other territories===
The "Palestinian movement" is not a secessionist movement (as the territory concerned is not recognised as forming part of any State) nor a sub-national territory (for the same reason), but the "Palestinian Territories" may, if they achieve sovereignty, apply for membership:
*{{flag|Palestinian National Authority}}:<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" /> the area that is currently claimed by this group was part of the British ] until 1948. The Palestinian Authority has shown interest in joining the Commonwealth upon independence.<ref name="BBC 2006"/>


===Other states=== ==External links==
*{{flag|Cambodia}}: An application was received ahead of the 1997 CHOGM, before the criteria for membership were changed; the heads of governments considered the application in light of the criteria change,<ref name="Edinburgh Commique, 1997" /> and rejected on the basis that the nation did not meet them.


* {{cite web |url=http://www.cpsu.org.uk/fileadmin/Gov_and_Demo/Post_Kampala_membership2.doc |title=Commonwealth Membership and the Patterson Commission Report: In the light of the Kampala Communiqué |accessdate=6 December 2009 |format=doc |first=Victoria |last=Velde-Ashworth |publisher=Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723140835/http://www.cpsu.org.uk/fileadmin/Gov_and_Demo/Post_Kampala_membership2.doc |archive-date=23 July 2011 |url-status=dead }}
There are a range of other states that have expressed formal or informal interest in joining the Commonwealth or have merely made enquiries about membership (expressing no view on whether they wish to become members), despite not meeting the Edinburgh criteria as they are now. However, with the criteria being re-examined, they may be inclined to launch membership bids in the future:
*{{flag|Algeria}}: has applied to join the Commonwealth.<ref name="Membership" />
*{{flag|Angola}}<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" />
*{{flag|Burundi}}
*{{flag|Democratic Republic of the Congo}}<ref name="The future of the modern Commonwealth" />
*{{flag|East Timor}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.etan.org/et2001c/november/04-10/06alkat.htm |title=Alkatiri Raises Possibility of Commonwealth Membership |accessdate=5 November 2006 |date=6 November 2001 |publisher=East Timor and Indonesia Action Network }}</ref>
* {{flag|Madagascar}}: has applied to join the Commonwealth.<ref name="Membership" />
*{{flag|Georgia}}<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100026409/libertarianism-has-made-georgia-rich-and-free/ |title=Libertarianism has made Georgia rich and free |accessdate=18 February 2010 |date=17 February 2010 |publisher=Daily Telegraph - Dan Hannan |location=London}}</ref>
*{{flag|Japan}} (Unofficial claim as observers and associate member, but not full membership as it was never linked in any way to the former British Empire) <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thecommonwealthconversation.org/2009/08/it-has-to-grow-wings-interview-with-lord-howell/ |title=“It has to grow wings”: Interview with Lord Howell |accessdate=1 June 2011 |date=11 September 2009 |publisher=Royal Commonwealth Society }}</ref>

==Footnotes==
{{Reflist|2}}

==External links==
* {{cite web|url=http://www.cpsu.org.uk/fileadmin/Gov_and_Demo/Post_Kampala_membership2.doc |title=Commonwealth Membership and the Patterson Commission Report: In the light of the Kampala Communiqué |accessdate=6 December 2009 |date= |format=doc |first=Victoria |last=Velde-Ashworth |publisher=Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit }}


{{Commonwealth of Nations topics}} {{Commonwealth of Nations topics}}
Line 139: Line 100:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Commonwealth Of Nations Membership Criteria}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Commonwealth Of Nations Membership Criteria}}
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 01:56, 30 July 2024

Rules for joining the political association of mostly former British colonies

The Commonwealth of Nations currently has 56 member states.   Member States   Former Member States   Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories

The criteria for membership in the Commonwealth of Nations, which apply to current and prospective member states, have been altered by a series of documents issued over the past eighty-two years.

The most important of these documents were the Statute of Westminster (1931), the London Declaration (1949), the Singapore Declaration (1971), the Harare Declaration (1991), the Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme (1995), the Edinburgh Declaration (1997), and the Kampala Communiqué (2007). New member states of the Commonwealth must abide by certain criteria that arose from these documents, the most important of which are the Harare principles and the Edinburgh criteria.

The Harare principles require all member states of the Commonwealth, old and new, to abide by certain political principles, including democracy and respect for human rights. These can be enforced upon current members, who may be suspended or expelled for failure to abide by them. To date, Fiji, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe have been suspended on these grounds; Zimbabwe later withdrew.

The foremost of the Edinburgh criteria requires new member states to have either constitutional or administrative ties to at least one current member state of the Commonwealth of Nations. Traditionally, new Commonwealth member states had ties to the United Kingdom. The Edinburgh criteria arose from the 1995 accession of Mozambique, at the time the only member state that was never part of the British Empire (in whole or part). The Edinburgh criteria have been reviewed, and were revised at the 2007 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, allowing the admission of Rwanda at the 2009 Meeting.

History

Founding documents

Louis St. Laurent, the author of the London Declaration formula that laid out embryonic membership criteria.

The formation of the Commonwealth of Nations is dated back to the Statute of Westminster, an Act of the British Parliament passed on 11 December 1931. The Statute established the independence of the Dominions, creating a group of equal members where, previously, there was one (the United Kingdom) paramount. The solitary condition of membership of the embryonic Commonwealth was that a state be a Dominion. Thus, the independence of Pakistan (1947), India (1947), and the Dominion of Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) (1948) saw the three countries join the Commonwealth as independent states that retained the King as head of state. On the other hand, Burma (1948) and Israel (1948) did not join the Commonwealth, as they chose to become republics. In 1949, the Commonwealth chose to regard Ireland as no longer being a member when Ireland repealed the External Relations Act under which the King had played a role in its diplomatic relations with other states, although the Irish government's view was that Ireland had not been a member for some years.

With India on the verge of promulgating a republican constitution, the 1949 Commonwealth Prime Ministers Conference was dominated by the impending departure of over half of the Commonwealth's population. To avoid such a fate, Canadian Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent proposed that republics be allowed to remain in the Commonwealth, provided that they recognise King George VI as 'Head of the Commonwealth'. Known as the London Declaration, this agreement thus established the only formalised rule as being that members must recognise the Head of the Commonwealth. The arrangement prompted suggestions that other countries, such as France, Israel, and Norway, join. However, until Western Samoa joined in 1970, only recently independent countries would accede.

Singapore Declaration

Main article: Singapore Declaration

The first statement of the political values of the Commonwealth of Nations was issued at the 1961 conference, at which the members declared that racial equality would be one of the cornerstones of the new Commonwealth, at a time when the organisation's ranks were being swelled by new African and Caribbean members. The immediate result of this was the withdrawal of South Africa's re-application, which it was required to lodge before becoming a republic, as its government's apartheid policies clearly contradicted the principle.

Further political values and principles of the Commonwealth were affirmed in Singapore on 22 January 1971, at the first Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM). The fourteen points clarified the political freedom of its members, and dictated the core principles of the Commonwealth: world peace, liberty, human rights, equality, and free trade. However, neither the terms nor the spirit of the Declaration were binding, and several openly flouted it; despite little conformity, only Fiji was ever expelled for breaching these tenets (on 15 October 1987, following the second coup of that year).

Harare Declaration

Main article: Harare Declaration

The Harare Declaration, issued on 20 October 1991 in Harare, Zimbabwe, reaffirmed the principles laid out in Singapore, particularly in the light of the ongoing dismantling of apartheid in South Africa. The Declaration put emphasis on human rights and democracy by detailing these principles once more:

  • We believe that international peace and order, global economic development and the rule of international law are essential to the security and prosperity of mankind;
  • We believe in the liberty of the individual under the law, in equal rights for all citizens regardless of gender, race, colour, creed or political belief, and in the individual's inalienable right to participate by means of free and democratic political processes in framing the society in which he or she lives;
  • We recognise racial prejudice and intolerance as a dangerous sickness and a threat to healthy development, and racial discrimination as an unmitigated evil;
  • We oppose all forms of racial oppression, and we are committed to the principles of human dignity and equality;
  • We recognise the importance and urgency of economic and social development to satisfy the basic needs and aspirations of the vast majority of the peoples of the world, and seek the progressive removal of the wide disparities in living standards amongst our members.

In 2002, Zimbabwe was suspended for breaching the Harare Declaration. Subsequently, when the Commonwealth refused to lift the suspension, Zimbabwe withdrew from the Commonwealth in 2003.

Millbrook Programme

Main article: Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme

The Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme, issued on 12 November 1995 at the Millbrook Resort, near Queenstown, New Zealand, clarified the Commonwealth's position on the Harare Declaration. The document introduced compulsion upon its members, with strict guidelines to be followed in the event of breaching its rules. These included but were not limited to expulsion from the Commonwealth. Adjudication was left to the newly created Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG).

At the same CHOGM, the Programme was enforced for the first time, as Nigeria was suspended. On 19 December 1995, the CMAG found that the suspension was in line with the Programme, and also declared its intent on enforcing the Programme in other cases (particularly Sierra Leone and The Gambia). On 29 May 1999, the day after the inauguration of Nigeria's first democratically elected President since the end of military rule, Olusẹgun Ọbasanjọ, the country's suspension was lifted, on the advice of the CMAG.

Edinburgh criteria

Main article: Edinburgh Declaration

In 1995, Mozambique, formerly a Portuguese colony, joined the Commonwealth, becoming the first member state to have never had a constitutional link with the United Kingdom. Concerns that this would allow open-ended expansion of the Commonwealth and dilute its historic ties prompted the 1995 CHOGM to launch the Inter-Governmental Group on Criteria for Commonwealth Membership, to report at the 1997 CHOGM, to be held in Edinburgh, Scotland. The group decided that, in future, new member states would be limited to those with constitutional association with an existing Commonwealth member state.

In addition to this new rule, the former rules were consolidated into a single document. They had been prepared for the High Level Appraisal Group set up at the 1989 CHOGM, but not publicly announced until 1997. These requirements, which remain the same today, are that members must:

  • accept and comply with the Harare principles.
  • be fully independent sovereign states.
  • recognise King Charles III as the Head of the Commonwealth.
  • accept the English language as the means of Commonwealth communication.
  • respect the wishes of the general population vis-à-vis Commonwealth membership.

Kampala review

On the advice of Secretary-General Don McKinnon, the 2005 CHOGM, held in Valletta, Malta, decided to re-examine the Edinburgh criteria. The Committee on Commonwealth Membership reported at the 2007 CHOGM, held in Kampala, Uganda. According to Don McKinnon, the members of the Commonwealth decided in principle to expand the membership of the organisation to include countries without linkages to the Commonwealth, but Eduardo del Buey stated that it would still take some time until the criteria are reformed. Outstanding applications as of the 2007 meeting included former Belgian colony Rwanda (application submitted in 2003 and approved in 2009), the former French colonies of Algeria and Madagascar, and the former British colony of Yemen and condominium of Sudan.

The revised requirements stated that:

  • (a) an applicant country should, as a general rule, have had a historic constitutional association with an existing Commonwealth member state, save in exceptional circumstances;
  • (b) in exceptional circumstances, applications should be considered on a case-by-case basis;
  • (c) an applicant country should accept and comply with Commonwealth fundamental values, principles, and priorities as set out in the 1971 Declaration of Commonwealth Principles and contained in other subsequent Declarations;
  • (d) an applicant country must demonstrate commitment to: democracy and democratic processes, including free and fair elections and representative legislatures; the rule of law and independence of the judiciary; good governance, including a well-trained public service and transparent public accounts; and protection of human rights, freedom of expression, and equality of opportunity;
  • (e) an applicant country should accept Commonwealth norms and conventions, such as the use of the English language as the medium of inter-Commonwealth relations, and acknowledge Queen Elizabeth II as the Head of the Commonwealth; and
  • (f) new member states should be encouraged to join the Commonwealth Foundation, and to promote vigorous civil society and business organisations within their countries, and to foster participatory democracy through regular civil society consultations

Rwanda became the 54th nation to join the Commonwealth at the 2009 CHOGM. It became the second country (after Mozambique) not to have any historical ties with the United Kingdom. Rwanda had been a colony of Germany in the 19th century and later of Belgium for the first half of the 20th century. Later ties with France were severed during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. President Paul Kagame also accused it of supporting the killings and expelled a number of French organisations from the country. Since the end of the genocide, English has increased in use. Prime Minister of Malaysia Najib Razak stated that Rwanda's application "was boosted by its commitment towards democracy as well as the values espoused by the Commonwealth". Consideration for its admission was also seen as an "exceptional circumstance" by the Commonwealth Secretariat.

Rwanda was admitted despite the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) finding that "the state of governance and human rights in Rwanda does not satisfy Commonwealth standards”, and that it “does not therefore qualify for admission". CHRI also commented that: "It does not make sense to admit a state that already does not satisfy Commonwealth standards. This would tarnish the reputation of the Commonwealth and confirm the opinion of many people and civic organisations that the leaders of its governments do not really care for democracy and human rights, and that its periodic, solemn declarations are merely hot air."

Both CHRI and Human Rights Watch have found that respect for democracy and human rights in Rwanda has declined since the country joined the Commonwealth.

References

  1. Howden, Daniel (26 November 2009). "The Big Question: What is the Commonwealth's role, and is it relevant to global politics?". The Independent. London.
  2. Ireland's status was a matter of controversy and debate between 1936 and 1949.
  3. "France and UK considered 1950s 'merger'". London: Guardian Unlimited. 15 January 2007. Retrieved 22 July 2007.
  4. "Kongebesøk i øyriket" (in Norwegian). Aftenposten. 26 October 2005. Archived from the original on 10 March 2007. Retrieved 15 December 2008.
  5. "Singapore Declaration of Commonwealth Principles 1971". Commonwealth Secretariat. 22 January 1971. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  6. "Fiji Rejoins the Commonwealth". Commonwealth Secretariat. 30 September 1997. Archived from the original on 1 November 2004. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  7. "Harare Commonwealth Declaration, 1991". Commonwealth Secretariat. 20 October 1991. Archived from the original on 30 September 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  8. "The Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme on the Harare Declaration, 1995". Commonwealth Secretariat. 12 November 1995. Archived from the original on 30 September 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  9. "First Meeting of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group on the Harare Declaration". Commonwealth Secretariat. 20 December 1995. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  10. "Nigeria Resumes Full Commonwealth Membership". Commonwealth Secretariat. 18 May 1999. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  11. "Edinburgh Communique, 1997". Commonwealth Secretariat. 27 October 1997. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  12. McIntyre, W. David (April 2008). "The Expansion of the Commonwealth and the Criteria for Membership". Round Table. 97 (395): 273–85. doi:10.1080/00358530801962089.
  13. Collinge, John (July 1996). "Criteria for Commonwealth Membership". Round Table. 85 (339): 279–86. doi:10.1080/00358539608454314.
  14. te Velde-Ashworth, Victoria (10 October 2005). "The future of the modern Commonwealth: Widening vs. deepening?". Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit. Archived from the original (doc) on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  15. "2005 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting: Final Communiqué". Commonwealth Secretariat. 27 November 2005. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
  16. Osike, Felix (24 November 2007). "Rwanda membership delayed". New Vision. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  17. 2007 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting: final communiqué Archived 16 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  18. Kron, Josh (28 November 2009). "Rwanda Joins Commonwealth". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  19. "Rwanda seeks to join Commonwealth". BBC News. 21 December 2006. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  20. Ross, Will (27 November 2009). "What would the Commonwealth do for Rwanda?". BBC News. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  21. Muin, Abdul; Majid, Abdul (29 November 2009). "Commonwealth Accepts Rwanda's Membership Bid". Bernama. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  22. "Rwanda: Joining the Commonwealth". The New Times. AllAfrica. 27 November 2009. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  23. ^ "Rwanda's application for membership, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative" (PDF). Retrieved 27 July 2021.
  24. "Rwanda, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative". Retrieved 27 July 2021.
  25. "Human Rights Watch, Rwanda country page". Retrieved 27 July 2021.

External links

Commonwealth of Nations topics
History
Governance
Heads of government
Commonwealth Family
Members
Culture
Lists
Categories: