| Revision as of 12:54, 13 June 2013 editEshwar.om (talk | contribs)1,654 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:44, 29 January 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (250 intermediate revisions by 59 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Thanks for your appreciation on Sarasvati river == | |||
| </br>. | |||
| Dear Eshwar.om, I tried to do what I felt most appropriate, at the best of my knowledge. | |||
| <font size =24 color=blue> I am Helpless.More domination over here</font> | |||
| You can have a better understanding of my points if you look at my much detailed explanatory discussion on the ''Sarasvati river'' with some of the experienced editors @] under the section titled "''Saraswati and myth-making''" . | |||
| Best regards. --] (]) 13:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Chera dynasty == | |||
| <font color=red> Truth Alone Prevails</font> | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| You are still messing around with images at ] despite umpteen people noting at ] that this aspect of your work is one of the many where you display signs of lacking competence. So, stop and discuss rather than edit war, please. Handing out a few barnstars etc to people who have criticised your efforts is not a get out of jail card. - ] (]) 05:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :And your restoration of gibberish at ] was no better. - ] (]) 05:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :The pen is mightier than the sword,so please could you explain why those images should not present in ]?! When in Rome, do as the Romans,(Handing out a few barnstars etc to people).got it?]] 05:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)<br /> | |||
| When the going gets tough, the tough get going.".i believe on that.]] 05:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Administrator advice == | |||
| {{ping|Eshwar.om}} I'm concerned that you don't appear to be heeding the guidance you have been given at ] and elsewhere to avoid disruption to the Encyclopedia. Editing here is a privilege, not a right and if you do not work cooperatively with other editors, your editing rights will be suspended or removed as someone who is ]. Thank you for your attention. ]<sup>♦]</sup> 05:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <br /> | <br /> | ||
| :Thank you]] 05:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <font color=blue> வாய்மையே வெல்லும்</font> | |||
| Eshwar.om, as you are aware (), India articles are subject to arbcom discretionary sanctions. If you continue to edit disruptively, you will find yourself banned from editing any articles related to India. You should heed Philg88's advice above and edit very carefully from now on. --] <small>(])</small> 11:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)<br /> | |||
| <font color=green> षत्यमेव् ञयते</font><br /> | |||
| yes i am aware of that.thanks]] 12:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="wikitable" | |||
| |- | |||
| ==A request== | |||
| ! வாய்மையே வெல்லும் !! "षत्यमेव् ञयते" !! Truth Alone Prevails | |||
| Dear ] i have certain points that i would like to share relating to tamil & sanskrit. | |||
| |- | |||
| May i know the languages known to you? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--><br /> | |||
| | "षत्यमेव् ञयते"||"सत्यमेव जयते" | אמת לבד לנצח|| "నిజము మాట్లాడునట్టి గెలుపు" | |||
| |- | |||
| ⚫ | <br /> | ||
| | الحقيقة وحدها يسود || "সত্য একাকী জেতেন" || "ಒಂಟಿಯಾಗಿ ಸತ್ಯ ವಿಜಯಗಳು" | |||
| the thing is basically i m from japan.but yes i know this two languages.i am not well scholar .but i m ok with that.]] 09:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |} <font color=brown> | |||
| == May 2015 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for a long-term pattern of uncooperative editing and lack of necessary editing and language skills. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=}}. ] ] 12:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
| * The reliable concepts are always better. | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=see for all my edits i given reliable sources.you mentioned uncooperative editing.after alert message given by RegentsPark i never do even a single edit.it is really painful painful for me.Please reconsider.My area of interest how could come uncooperative edit.consider this. now from my end there is no chance for further appeal.how can i say my point to ANI. indefinite block is really makes me feel bad .Please reconsider .thank you]] 13:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC|decline=Your poor command of the English language makes it quite difficult to understand your request, but it does not appear to address the reasons for your block. Have you considered contributing in the Misplaced Pages of your native language?--]] 20:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| * What else to say, congratulations for your contributions with Misplaced Pages!,] (]) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1='''It says I've been "indefinitely" blocked. What does that mean and how do I get unblocked?''' <br /> '''Is that only reason what you mentioned above?!'''<br /> '''Wont i contribute here again?! '''<br /> '''What can I do now?''']] 01:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | decline = You haven't addressed the reason for your block, which indicates that your attitude to English Misplaced Pages remains unchanged. For further information on indefinite blocks, please see ]. ]<sup>♦]</sup> 06:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| Here is what you have to do; | |||
| There are many sister Misplaced Pages projects such as , , . Select any of them or all, and try to contribute there for about 6 months without creating any havoc like you did here. I believe that you will be granted with unblock, and consider making at least 1000 edits. Best of luck! ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 05:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Contributing to another project is no longer considered as part of the standard offer any more. See ]. Regardless of the standard offer, contributing to ENWP requires a fairly advanced level of English, not only for the presentation of an article but also for communication with others. Should Eshwar.om achieve that level of ability, there'd certainly be a case to be made for their return. ] (]) 11:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> | |||
| ] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.''' | |||
| <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ] • ] • • }} • ] • • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()) </span> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the ]'s '']''.<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p> ]<sup>♦]</sup> 12:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Swami Vivekananda and Tamils == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''This isn't about a book or a chapter in a book, it's a one paragraph translated extract from an out of copyright work. As it's such a small extract, there's no point in transwikiing to wikisource either.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> —]''']''' 15:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Pillaiyar (disambiguation) == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''This isn't a proper dab, it confuses a disambiguation with a starting string, the places included aren't shortened or referred to in such a manner.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| == All the best ==</font> | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> —]''']''' 16:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please stop assuming ] as you did at ]. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to ] and ], and is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-own3 --> ''You have been blocked a numerous times for your disruptive edits. Consider this your final warning. Next time you assume ownership/add images to a well written article without discussing the same, I will report you. '' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 09:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Chieftain Pulli == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Misplaced Pages articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-tdel4 --> <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 11:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Misrepresentation of source, the source (translated) quotes a 3rd century poet saying that the hill belonged to a chieftain by the name of Pulli, that's about it. No reference to him being a ruler or even the full name etc etc''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Abhishek191288|I don't know why?|ts=07:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 07:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| :Please can you take another look at Abhishek's talk page - I've added a comment there and I think it is important that you read it otherwise you could soon find yourself blocked from contributing. You are making a lot of basic errors, which is ok provided that you learn from them. - ] (]) 12:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> —]''']''' 16:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Abhishek191288|I don't know why?|ts=12:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| Please see the reply from Sitush. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 12:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:44, 29 January 2023
Thanks for your appreciation on Sarasvati river
Dear Eshwar.om, I tried to do what I felt most appropriate, at the best of my knowledge. You can have a better understanding of my points if you look at my much detailed explanatory discussion on the Sarasvati river with some of the experienced editors @User talk:Kautilya3 under the section titled "Saraswati and myth-making" .
Best regards. --BodduLokesh (talk) 13:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Chera dynasty
You are still messing around with images at Chera dynasty despite umpteen people noting at WP:ANI that this aspect of your work is one of the many where you display signs of lacking competence. So, stop and discuss rather than edit war, please. Handing out a few barnstars etc to people who have criticised your efforts is not a get out of jail card. - Sitush (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- And your restoration of gibberish at Valmiki was no better. - Sitush (talk) 05:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- The pen is mightier than the sword,so please could you explain why those images should not present in Chera dynasty?! When in Rome, do as the Romans,(Handing out a few barnstars etc to people).got it?Eshwar.om 05:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
When the going gets tough, the tough get going.".i believe on that.Eshwar.om 05:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Administrator advice
@Eshwar.om: I'm concerned that you don't appear to be heeding the guidance you have been given at WP:ANI and elsewhere to avoid disruption to the Encyclopedia. Editing here is a privilege, not a right and if you do not work cooperatively with other editors, your editing rights will be suspended or removed as someone who is not here to build an encyclopedia. Thank you for your attention. Philg88 05:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank youEshwar.om 05:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Eshwar.om, as you are aware (notification diff), India articles are subject to arbcom discretionary sanctions. If you continue to edit disruptively, you will find yourself banned from editing any articles related to India. You should heed Philg88's advice above and edit very carefully from now on. --regentspark (comment) 11:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
yes i am aware of that.thanksEshwar.om 12:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
A request
Dear i have certain points that i would like to share relating to tamil & sanskrit.
May i know the languages known to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.236.255.113 (talk) 07:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
the thing is basically i m from japan.but yes i know this two languages.i am not well scholar .but i m ok with that.Eshwar.om 09:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
{{unblock|reason=}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Eshwar.om (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
see for all my edits i given reliable sources.you mentioned uncooperative editing.after alert message given by RegentsPark i never do even a single edit.it is really painful painful for me.Please reconsider.My area of interest how could come uncooperative edit.consider this. now from my end there is no chance for further appeal.how can i say my point to ANI. indefinite block is really makes me feel bad .Please reconsider .thank youEshwar.om 13:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC
Decline reason:
Your poor command of the English language makes it quite difficult to understand your request, but it does not appear to address the reasons for your block. Have you considered contributing in the Misplaced Pages of your native language?--Anthony Bradbury 20:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Eshwar.om (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It says I've been "indefinitely" blocked. What does that mean and how do I get unblocked?
Is that only reason what you mentioned above?!
Wont i contribute here again?!
What can I do now?Eshwar.om 01:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You haven't addressed the reason for your block, which indicates that your attitude to English Misplaced Pages remains unchanged. For further information on indefinite blocks, please see this essay. Philg88 06:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Here is what you have to do;
There are many sister Misplaced Pages projects such as en.wikiquote.org, simple.wikipedia.org, commons.wikimedia.org. Select any of them or all, and try to contribute there for about 6 months without creating any havoc like you did here. I believe that you will be granted with unblock, and consider making at least 1000 edits. Best of luck! OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Contributing to another project is no longer considered as part of the standard offer any more. See WP:OFFER. Regardless of the standard offer, contributing to ENWP requires a fairly advanced level of English, not only for the presentation of an article but also for communication with others. Should Eshwar.om achieve that level of ability, there'd certainly be a case to be made for their return. Blackmane (talk) 11:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Philg88 12:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Swami Vivekananda and Tamils
The article Swami Vivekananda and Tamils has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This isn't about a book or a chapter in a book, it's a one paragraph translated extract from an out of copyright work. As it's such a small extract, there's no point in transwikiing to wikisource either.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 15:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pillaiyar (disambiguation)
The article Pillaiyar (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This isn't a proper dab, it confuses a disambiguation with a starting string, the places included aren't shortened or referred to in such a manner.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 16:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chieftain Pulli
The article Chieftain Pulli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Misrepresentation of source, the source (translated) quotes a 3rd century poet saying that the hill belonged to a chieftain by the name of Pulli, that's about it. No reference to him being a ruler or even the full name etc etc
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 16:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)