Revision as of 04:23, 17 June 2013 edit76.87.31.178 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:26, 21 November 2024 edit undoKaltenmeyer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users118,741 editsm clean upTag: AWB | ||
(335 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|American non-profit political organization}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2012}} | {{Use mdy dates|date=April 2012}} | ||
{{Infobox organization | {{Infobox organization | ||
Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
|image = National Organization for Marriage.gif | |image = National Organization for Marriage.gif | ||
|size = 120px | |size = 120px | ||
|motto = Protecting Marriage and<br>the Faith Communities<br>that Sustain It | |||
|formation = 2007 | |formation = 2007 | ||
|type = ] | |type = ] | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|leader_title = President | |leader_title = President | ||
|leader_name = ] | |leader_name = ] | ||
|website = | |website = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Conservatism US}} | |||
The National Organization for Marriage is an American non-profit political organization established in 2007 to work for laws that preserve traditional marriage in the United States. The '''National Organization for Marriage''' ('''NOM''') is an American non-profit political organization established in 2007 to work against legalization of ].<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GRIhoRBj04cC&pg=PA222 |page=222 |title=Same-sex marriage: a reference handbook |last=Newton |first=David E. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2010 |isbn=1-59884-707-4}}</ref> It was formed in 2007 specifically to pass ] prohibiting same-sex marriage in California.<ref name=Mencimer2010>{{cite journal |url=http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/07/national-organization-for-marriage-donors |title=Gay Marriage Foes: 'Til Disclosure Do Us Part? |first=Stephanie |last=Mencimer |work=Mother Jones |date=July 1, 2010 |publisher=Mother Jones and the Foundation for National Progress}}</ref> The group has opposed civil union legislation<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/29/us-gaymarriage-rhodeisland-idUSTRE75S85F20110629 | work=Reuters | title=Rhode Island takes major step toward approving civil unions | date=June 29, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.providencejournal.com/breaking-news/2011/05/house-expected-to-vote-on-civi.html#.TqTboHHqSIk |title=RI House approves 'civil unions,' 62 to 11 |publisher=The Providence Journal |date=May 19, 2011 |accessdate=October 24, 2011}}</ref> and opposes ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nomblog.com/7120/ |title=URGENT ALERT: Tell Gov. McDonnell to Oppose Same-Sex Adoption Regs |last=Brown |first=Brian |authorlink=Brian S. Brown |date=April 6, 2011 |work=NOM Blog |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |accessdate=April 13, 2011}}</ref> NOM's current president is ]. | |||
The '''National Organization for Marriage''' ('''NOM''') is an American ] established to work against the legalization of ].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/samesexmarriager0000newt_u7m4 |url-access=registration |page= |title=Same-sex marriage: a reference handbook |last=Newton |first=David E. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-59884-707-9}}</ref> It was formed in 2007 specifically to pass ], a state prohibition of same-sex marriage.<ref name=Mencimer2010>{{cite journal |url=http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/07/national-organization-for-marriage-donors |title=Gay Marriage Foes: 'Til Disclosure Do Us Part? |first=Stephanie |last=Mencimer |journal=Mother Jones |date=July 1, 2010 |publisher=Mother Jones and the Foundation for National Progress}}</ref> The group has opposed civil union legislation<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-gaymarriage-rhodeisland-idUSTRE75S85F20110629 | work=Reuters | title=Rhode Island takes major step toward approving civil unions | date=June 29, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.providencejournal.com/breaking-news/2011/05/house-expected-to-vote-on-civi.html#.TqTboHHqSIk |title=RI House approves 'civil unions,' 62 to 11 |newspaper=The Providence Journal |date=May 19, 2011 |access-date=October 24, 2011}}</ref> and ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nomblog.com/7120/ |title=Urgent Alert: Tell Gov. McDonnell to Oppose Same-Sex Adoption Regs |last=Brown |first=Brian |author-link=Brian S. Brown |date=April 6, 2011 |work=NOM Blog |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |access-date=April 13, 2011}}</ref> and has fought against allowing transgender individuals to use bathrooms that accord with their gender identity.<ref name="bathrooms">{{cite news|last=Dolan |first=Maura |url=https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-prop-8-transgender-20130920,0,1385482.story |title=Prop. 8 backers behind effort to repeal transgender law |work=Los Angeles Times |date=2013-09-20 |access-date=2013-11-02}}</ref> ] has served as the group's president since 2010. | |||
==Leadership== | ==Leadership== | ||
] speaking at the ] in 2010]] | ] speaking at the ] in 2010]] | ||
NOM's founding board of directors consisted of:<ref name="About NOM 2007">{{cite web |url= http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.3479573/k.E2D0/About_NOM.htm |title= About NOM |publisher= National Organization for Marriage | |
NOM's founding board of directors consisted of:<ref name="About NOM 2007">{{cite web |url= http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.3479573/k.E2D0/About_NOM.htm |title= About NOM |publisher= National Organization for Marriage |access-date=April 19, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071217180655/http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.3479573/k.E2D0/About_NOM.htm |archive-date=December 17, 2007}}</ref> | ||
* ], |
* ], president | ||
* ], |
* ], executive director (former executive director of Family Institute of Connecticut)<ref name="About NOM 2011">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.3479573/k.E2D0/About_NOM.htm |title=About NOM – National Organization for Marriage |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |access-date=April 18, 2011}}</ref> | ||
* ], |
* ], chairman of the board | ||
* Neil Corkery, |
* Neil Corkery, treasurer | ||
* Chuck Stetson ( |
* Chuck Stetson (chairman of the board, Bible Literacy Project)<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.bibleliteracy.org/Site/Board/index.htm |title= Boards and Staff |publisher= Bible Literacy Project |access-date= April 13, 2011 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110716135117/http://www.bibleliteracy.org/Site/Board/index.htm |archive-date= July 16, 2011 |df= mdy-all }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
* Ken Von Kohorn ( |
* Ken Von Kohorn (chairman of the board, ])<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ctfamily.org/staff.html |title=Our Staff, Board of Directors, and Advisory Council Members |publisher=Family Institute of Connecticut |access-date=April 13, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110406005720/http://www.ctfamily.org/staff.html |archive-date=April 6, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
* Luis Tellez ( |
* Luis Tellez (president, ] Board of Trustees)<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.winst.org/people/trustees.php |title= Board of Trustees |publisher= Witherspoon Institute |access-date= April 13, 2011 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110613230549/http://winst.org/people/trustees.php |archive-date= June 13, 2011 |df= mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
* ] ( |
* ] (president, ])<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.uvu.edu/profpages/profiles/show/user_id/6127/ |title= UVU Employee Professional Pages |publisher= ] |access-date= April 13, 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110716064811/http://www.uvu.edu/profpages/profiles/show/user_id/6127/ |archive-date= July 16, 2011 |url-status= dead |df= mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
In April 2009, Holland was replaced on the board by ] (science fiction novelist and faculty member, ]) |
In April 2009, Holland was replaced on the board by ] (science fiction novelist and faculty member, ]),<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=6938473 |title= National Organization for Marriage Welcomes Orson Scott Card to its Board of Directors |publisher= National Organization for Marriage |date=April 23, 2009 |access-date=April 13, 2011 }}</ref> who then resigned in July 2013 after calling the battle against legalization of same-sex marriage in the US "moot" following a Supreme Court decision.<ref>Josh Rottenberg, ''Entertainment Weekly'', July 26, 2013</ref> In September 2011, law professor ] replaced Gallagher as the chairman of the board.<ref name="nationformarriage1">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=11231037¬oc=1 |title=NOM Announces New Chairman of the Board |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |date=September 22, 2011 |access-date=October 24, 2011}}</ref> | ||
As of 2021, Brown remains the president and Eastman chairman of the board.<ref>{{cite web |title=Leadership |url=https://nationformarriage.org/about/leadership |website=Nation for Marriage |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |access-date=July 18, 2021 |ref=NOM 2021}}</ref> As of 2011, law professor Robert P. George was chairman emeritus.<ref name="About NOM 2011"/> As of 2011, Gallagher was still a board member and worked on specific projects for the group.<ref name="nationformarriage1"/> | |||
==Nonprofit status and funding== | ==Nonprofit status and funding== | ||
The group operates two nonprofit arms: a ] political advocacy group called National Organization for Marriage Inc. established in January 2008, and a ] called NOM Education Fund established in July 2008.<ref name=Blanco2009>{{cite web |url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/07/14/753343/-Knock,-Knock,-Anybody-NOM-Anybody-Mormon |title=Knock, Knock, Anybody NOM? Anybody Mormon? |last=Blanco |first=Chino |work=Daily Kos |date=July 14, 2009 |accessdate=November 12, 2011}}</ref> The latter arm is not entitled to influence legislation or political campaigns.<ref name=Jackson2009>{{cite news |url=http://www.northjersey.com/news/Who_bankrolls_gay_marriage_ads.html |title=New Jersey grass roots campaigns don't reveal funding sources |last=Jackson |first=Herb |work=Washington Independent |date=November 29, 2011}}</ref> The Firefighters' Defense Fund, which existed to fund a successful sexual harassment lawsuit by firemen who claim they were forced to participate in a ] parade, was a NOM Education Fund project.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,495185,00.html |work=Fox News |title=Jury Says San Diego Firefighters Were Sexually Harassed in Gay Parade |date=February 17, 2009}}</ref> | |||
=== Groups and projects === | |||
The group also operates a number of state-based ]s such as National Organization for Marriage PAC New York founded in June 2009, and National Organization for Marriage California PAC founded in February 2009.<ref name=Blanco2009/><ref name=Jackson2009/> The state PACs receive funding from the main 501(c)(4) NOM arm. | |||
The group operates two nonprofit arms: a ] political advocacy group called National Organization for Marriage Inc., established in January 2008, and a ] called NOM Education Fund established in July 2008.<ref name=Blanco2009>{{cite web |url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/07/14/753343/-Knock,-Knock,-Anybody-NOM-Anybody-Mormon |title=Knock, Knock, Anybody NOM? Anybody Mormon? |last=Blanco |first=Chino |work=Daily Kos |date=July 14, 2009 |access-date=November 12, 2011}}</ref> The latter arm is not entitled to influence legislation or political campaigns.<ref name=Jackson2009>{{cite news |url=http://www.northjersey.com/news/Who_bankrolls_gay_marriage_ads.html |title=New Jersey grass roots campaigns don't reveal funding sources |last=Jackson |first=Herb |work=Washington Independent |date=November 29, 2011}}</ref> The Firefighters' Defense Fund, which existed to fund a successful sexual harassment lawsuit by firemen who claim they were forced to participate in a ] parade, was a NOM Education Fund project.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/jury-says-san-diego-firefighters-were-sexually-harassed-in-gay-parade |work=Fox News |title=Jury Says San Diego Firefighters Were Sexually Harassed in Gay Parade |date=February 17, 2009}}</ref> | |||
The group also operates state-based ]s such as National Organization for Marriage PAC New York founded in June 2009, and National Organization for Marriage California PAC founded in February 2009.<ref name=Blanco2009/><ref name=Jackson2009/> The state PACs receive funding from the main 501(c)(4) NOM arm. | |||
NOM has said that it has a wide base of ] support, but the majority of its funding is from very few large anonymous donors.<ref name=Johnson2011>{{cite news |url=http://washingtonindependent.com/104788/despite-grassroots-claim-most-of-national-organization-for-marriage-funding-comes-from-few-sources |title=Despite 'grassroots' claim, most of National Organization for Marriage funding comes from few sources |last=Johnson |first=Luke |work=Washington Independent |date=January 6, 2011}}</ref> In NOM's ] filing for 2009, three donations of $2.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million made up 68% of NOM's contributions and grants income of a little over $7.1 million, and just five donations made up 75%.<ref name=Johnson2011/> In 2010, Jesse Zwick, then a reporter for the '']'', said he uncovered a 2009 donation to NOM—$1.43 million from the ]<ref name=Zwick2010>{{cite news |url=http://www.americanindependent.com/141896/in-wake-of-ballot-initiatives-questions-about-the-national-organization-for-marriage%e2%80%99s-funding |title=In wake of ballot initiatives, questions about the National Organization for Marriage's funding |location=Washington DC |last=Zwick |first=Jesse |work=The American Independent |date=September 20, 2010}}</ref>—that reporter Luke Johnson later said was apparently not reported to the IRS by NOM.<ref name=Johnson2011/> In 2010, two donors provided $6 million, two-thirds of the total donations for the year.<ref>{{cite news |first=Sofia |last=Resnick |url=http://washingtonindependent.com/116452/nom%E2%80%99s-2010-financial-records-raise-questions |title=National Organization for Marriage's 2010 financial records raise questions |work=The Washington Independent |date=July 27, 2010 |accessdate=December 15, 2011}}</ref> | |||
=== Funding === | |||
Gay rights activist ] gave his opinion that NOM is connected to the ], with large private donations coming from ] sources.<ref name=Mencimer2010/> Gallagher responded by denying any connection to the LDS movement "except that a Mormon serves on NOM's board."<ref name=Blanco2009/> Former board member Matthew S. Holland is a Mormon as is his replacement Orson Scott Card, and Catholic board member Robert P. George has served since August 2010 as an editorial advisor to the '']'', a Mormon newspaper.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700059575/Deseret-News-introduces-Editorial-Advisory-Board.html |title=Deseret News introduces Editorial Advisory Board |date=August 23, 2010 |work=Deseret News |location=Salt Lake City }}</ref> Reporter Zwick demonstrated that at least one major donation in 2009 came from a Catholic group, the Knights of Columbus.<ref name=Zwick2010/> | |||
NOM claims it has a wide base of ] support, however the majority of its funding comes from a very few anonymous sources making large donations.<ref name=Johnson2011>{{cite news |url=http://washingtonindependent.com/104788/despite-grassroots-claim-most-of-national-organization-for-marriage-funding-comes-from-few-sources |title=Despite 'grassroots' claim, most of National Organization for Marriage funding comes from few sources |last=Johnson |first=Luke |work=Washington Independent |date=January 6, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119182240/http://washingtonindependent.com/104788/despite-grassroots-claim-most-of-national-organization-for-marriage-funding-comes-from-few-sources |archive-date=January 19, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> In NOM's ] filing for 2009,<ref name="2009 Form 990">{{cite web|url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/46347477/2009-990s-Public-Copy|title=Form 990 for Tax Year 2009|publisher=National Organization for Marriage|access-date=April 4, 2011|format=PDF}}</ref> three donations of $2.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million made up 68% of NOM's contributions and grants income of a little over $7.1 million, and just five donations made up 75%.<ref name=Johnson2011/> | |||
The organization's financial disclosures for the 2009 tax year reported revenues of about $7.4 million including investment income, and expenditures of about $7.5 million.<ref name="2009 Form 990">{{cite web|url=http://www.scribd.com/doc/46347477/2009-990s-Public-Copy|title=Form 990 for Tax Year 2009|publisher=National Organization for Marriage|accessdate=April 4, 2011|format=PDF}}</ref> | |||
In 2010, Jesse Zwick, then a reporter for the '']'', said he uncovered a 2009 donation to NOM—$1.43 million from the ]<ref name=Zwick2010>{{cite news |url=http://www.americanindependent.com/141896/in-wake-of-ballot-initiatives-questions-about-the-national-organization-for-marriage%e2%80%99s-funding |title=In wake of ballot initiatives, questions about the National Organization for Marriage's funding |location=Washington DC |last=Zwick |first=Jesse |work=The American Independent |date=September 20, 2010 |access-date=November 12, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130102141755/http://americanindependent.com/141896/in-wake-of-ballot-initiatives-questions-about-the-national-organization-for-marriage%e2%80%99s-funding |archive-date=January 2, 2013 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref>—that reporter Luke Johnson later said was apparently not reported to the IRS by NOM.<ref name=Johnson2011/> | |||
In 2010, two donors provided $6 million, two-thirds of the total donations for the year.<ref>{{cite news |first=Sofia |last=Resnick |url=http://washingtonindependent.com/116452/nom%E2%80%99s-2010-financial-records-raise-questions |title=National Organization for Marriage's 2010 financial records raise questions |work=The Washington Independent |date=July 27, 2010 |access-date=December 15, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120107203322/http://washingtonindependent.com/116452/nom%E2%80%99s-2010-financial-records-raise-questions |archive-date=January 7, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
On its 2012 tax return, NOM reported a roughly $2 million deficit. Three donors contributed nearly two-thirds of the organization's $9.3 million in donations.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/07/evangelicals-gay-marriage-108608_Page3.html |title=Evangelicals Are Changing Their Minds on Gay Marriage: And the Bible isn't getting in their way |author=Jim Hinch |website=] |date=July 7, 2014 |access-date=2014-07-14 }}</ref> | |||
=== Mormon connection === | |||
Gay rights activist ] said in 2010 that NOM is connected to ], with large private donations coming from ] sources.<ref name=Mencimer2010/> Gallagher responded by denying any connection "except that a Mormon serves on NOM's board."<ref name=Blanco2009/> Former board member ] is a Mormon as is his replacement ], and Catholic board member Robert P. George has served since August 2010 as an editorial advisor to the '']'', a newspaper owned by the LDS Church.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.deseret.com/2010/8/24/20136457/deseret-news-introduces-editorial-advisory-board/ |title=Deseret News introduces Editorial Advisory Board |date=August 23, 2010 |work=Deseret News |location=Salt Lake City }}</ref> | |||
==Activity== | ==Activity== | ||
NOM has been involved in ballot measures, legislative elections, judicial elections, and issue advertising in various states. NOM was involved in the successful Proposition 8 campaign in California in 2008, as well as a similar successful campaign in Maine one year later. NOM was also involved in unsuccessful efforts to pass an amendment eliminating same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2007. NOM participated in efforts to block same-sex marriage in New Jersey,<ref>{{cite news |title=Racing against Corzine exit, Christie entrance in NJ |last=Kovalinsky |first=Susan Marie |url=http://www.nowpublic.com/world/racing-against-corzine-exit-christie-entrance-nj |newspaper=] |date=December 10, 2009 |accessdate=April 14, 2011}}</ref> and has unsuccessfully attempted to block same-sex marriage legalization in New York,<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-5094334-503544.html | work=CBS News | first=Prerana | last=Swami | title=N.Y. Gay Marriage Bill Faces New Challenges | date=June 17, 2009 |accessdate=April 19, 2011}}</ref> Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia. On June 16, 2009, NOM announced the formation of NOM PAC New York, a political action committee with a goal of providing $500,000 to fund primary challenges against any Republican New York state senator who votes for gay marriage. NOM stated that they were "also looking to aid Democratic candidates who want to buck the establishment on the marriage issue, and to help in general election contests."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.ksJQKZPCJnH/b.4430065/ |title=Marriage Victory in New York! |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |date=December 2, 2009 |accessdate=March 8, 2010}}</ref> In 2010, NOM was involved in successful efforts to oust three Iowa Supreme Court judges who had concurred in a decision that effectively legalized same-sex marriage there.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/us/politics/04judges.html | work=The New York Times | first=A. G. | last=Sulzberger | title=Iowa Judges Defeated After Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage | date=November 3, 2010 |accessdate=April 19, 2011}}</ref> | |||
NOM has been involved in ballot measures, legislative elections, judicial elections, and issue advertising in various states. NOM was involved in the successful Proposition 8 campaign in California in 2008, as well as a similar successful campaign in Maine one year later. They were also involved in unsuccessful efforts to pass an amendment eliminating same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2007. NOM participated in efforts to block same-sex marriage in New Jersey,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/09/advocates-tap-war-chest-battle-sex-marriage-new-jersey/?test=latestnews |title=Two Sides Spend Big in Battle Over Same-Sex Marriage in New Jersey |work=Fox News |date= December 10, 2009|access-date=2013-11-02}}</ref> and has unsuccessfully attempted to block same-sex marriage legalization in New York,<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ny-gay-marriage-bill-faces-new-challenges/ | work=CBS News | first=Prerana | last=Swami | title=N.Y. Gay Marriage Bill Faces New Challenges | date=June 17, 2009 |access-date=April 19, 2011}}</ref> Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia. On June 16, 2009, NOM announced the formation of NOM PAC New York, a political action committee with a goal of providing $500,000 to fund primary challenges against any Republican New York state senator who votes for gay marriage. NOM stated that they were "also looking to aid Democratic candidates who want to buck the establishment on the marriage issue, and to help in general election contests."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.ksJQKZPCJnH/b.4430065/ |title=Marriage Victory in New York! |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |date=December 2, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010}}</ref> In 2010, NOM was involved in successful efforts to oust three Iowa Supreme Court judges who had concurred in a decision that effectively legalized same-sex marriage there.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/us/politics/04judges.html | work=The New York Times | first=A. G. | last=Sulzberger | title=Iowa Judges Defeated After Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage | date=November 3, 2010 |access-date=April 19, 2011}}</ref> | |||
In 2009, Peter Montgomery of the progressive organization ] stated: "You have to take seriously They've raised a tremendous amount of money that they're funneling into various states."<ref name="waposanity">{{cite news| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/27/AR2009082704139.html | newspaper=The Washington Post | first=Monica | last=Hesse | title=Opposing Gay Unions With Sanity & a Smile | date=August 28, 2009 |accessdate=April 13, 2011}}</ref> | |||
In 2009, Peter Montgomery of the progressive organization ] stated: "You have to take seriously They've raised a tremendous amount of money that they're funneling into various states."<ref name="waposanity">{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/27/AR2009082704139.html | newspaper=The Washington Post | first=Monica | last=Hesse | title=Opposing Gay Unions With Sanity & a Smile | date=August 28, 2009 |access-date=April 13, 2011}}</ref> | |||
===2007 Massachusetts constitutional amendment=== | ===2007 Massachusetts constitutional amendment=== | ||
One of the group's first public acts was to campaign in support of a proposed 2007 ] banning same-sex marriage<ref name='Boston-Globe-Phillips-2007-06-14'>{{cite news | first=Frank | last=Phillips | title=Legislators vote to defeat same-sex marriage ban | date=June 14, 2007 |work=The Boston Globe | url=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/breaking_news/2007/06/legislators_vot_1.html | accessdate =June 15, 2007 }}</ref> by restricting marriage to "the union of one man and one woman", in response to the ] that legalized same-sex marriage in that state. The NOM-supported amendment failed to pass. The campaign included a billboard comparing representative ] to ] and ] after he ] to oppose the amendment.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.masslive.com/hampfrank/republican/index.ssf?/base/news-11/1191659155256990.xml&coll=1 |title= Billboard attacks gay marriage vote |newspaper=] |accessdate=April 19, 2011 |last=Ring |first=Dan }}</ref> | |||
One of the group's first public acts was to campaign in support of a proposed 2007 ] banning same-sex marriage<ref name="Boston-Globe-Phillips-2007-06-14">{{cite news | first=Frank | last=Phillips | title=Legislators vote to defeat same-sex marriage ban | date=June 14, 2007 |work=The Boston Globe | url=https://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/breaking_news/2007/06/legislators_vot_1.html | access-date =June 15, 2007 }}</ref> by restricting marriage to "the union of one man and one woman", in response to the ] that legalized same-sex marriage in that state. The NOM-supported amendment failed to pass. The campaign included a billboard comparing representative ] to ] and ] after he ] to oppose the amendment.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.masslive.com/hampfrank/republican/index.ssf?/base/news-11/1191659155256990.xml&coll=1 |title= Billboard attacks gay marriage vote |newspaper=] |access-date=April 19, 2011 |last=Ring |first=Dan }}</ref> | |||
===California Proposition 8=== | ===California Proposition 8=== | ||
NOM was first formed to support the passage of ] in 2008, which amended the ] to discontinue same-sex marriage ceremonies. The amendment defined marriage as the union between one man and one woman.<ref name=Mencimer2010/><ref name="dbowen">{{cite web|url=http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1303282|title=Campaign Finance: National Organization For Marriage California – Yes On 8 |publisher=Secretary of State Debra Bowen| |
NOM was first formed to support the passage of ] in 2008, which amended the ] to discontinue same-sex marriage ceremonies. The amendment defined marriage as the union between one man and one woman.<ref name=Mencimer2010/><ref name="dbowen">{{cite web|url=http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1303282|title=Campaign Finance: National Organization For Marriage California – Yes On 8 |publisher=Secretary of State Debra Bowen|access-date=April 22, 2011}}</ref> NOM contributed $1.8 million to the Proposition 8 effort,<ref name="idoidont">{{cite news |title='I Do'? I Don't! |first=Eve |last=Conant |url=http://www.newsweek.com/2010/11/15/i-do-i-don-t-gay-marriage-s-worst-opponent.html |newspaper=] |date=November 15, 2010 |access-date=April 22, 2011}}</ref> and has been described as being "instrumental" in the success of the initiative.<ref name="waposanity" /> Proposition 8 was passed by voters 52% to 48%, and involved an estimated $83M<ref name="finalnumbers">{{cite news|title=Tracking the money: Final Numbers|url=https://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-moneymap,0,2198220.htmlstory | work=Los Angeles Times}}</ref> by both sides of the issue. The amendment was in force until ] Judge ] overturned it in August 2010, in the case '']'', ruling that it violated both the ] and Equal Protection clauses of the ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Ruling by United States District Court|url=http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/acrobat/2010/08/04/Prop-8-Ruling-FINAL.pdf?tsp=1|access-date=August 4, 2010 | newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle}}</ref> NOM chairman Maggie Gallagher expressed her disagreement with the ruling, targeting Walker's sexuality and accusing him of "substituting his views for those of the American people and of our Founding Fathers." NOM President, Brian Snow, also expressed dissatisfaction with the ruling, stating "With a stroke of his pen, Judge Walker has overruled the votes and values of 7 million Californians" <ref>{{cite news| url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/08/calif-ban-on-same-sex-marriage-prop-8-ruled-unconstitutional/1#.Uc35dGJQEdg |title=California's Prop. 8 ban on same-sex marriage ruled unconstitutional | work=USA Today | date=August 4, 2010}}</ref> Walker did however place a temporary injunction on same-sex marriages to allow the defendants to bring their case before the United States Supreme Court. On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled the defendants in the case lacked standing to appeal earlier rulings in Federal Court.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/26/politics/scotus-prop-8/index.html | work=CNN | title=Supreme Court dismisses California's Proposition 8 appeal | date=June 27, 2013}}</ref> As a consequence, Walker's opinion striking down the law as unconstitutional stands as the final decision in the case. NOM addressed the Supreme Court's ruling on its website, asking the nation "show its displeasure" with the ruling, adding that "the Supreme Court ripped the legs out from under the institution of marriage."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nomblog.com/35926 |title=What You Can Do Today to Help Save Marriage |publisher=NOM Blog |date=2013-06-28 |access-date=2013-11-02 |archive-date=July 1, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130701225420/http://www.nomblog.com/35926 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
===Stand for Marriage Maine=== | ===Stand for Marriage Maine=== | ||
In 2009, NOM was the primary contributor to Stand For Marriage Maine, the organization that led<ref name=nyt20091030 /> the successful<ref name="NYT">{{cite news|last=Goodnough |first=Abby |url= |
In 2009, NOM was the primary contributor to Stand For Marriage Maine, the organization that led<ref name=nyt20091030 /> the successful<ref name="NYT">{{cite news|last=Goodnough |first=Abby |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/us/05marriage.html |title=Loss in Maine Sets Back Gay-Marriage Drive |location=Maine |work=The New York Times |date=November 17, 2009 |access-date=June 16, 2011}}</ref> campaign for ] in Maine, a ] that repealed the law passed by the legislature to allow same-sex marriages in the state. Voters passed the referendum 53%–47% out of 567,057 votes cast.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://elections.nytimes.com/2009/results/other.html |title=Other National Races – Election Results 2009 – The New York Times |publisher=Elections.nytimes.com |date=November 9, 2009 |access-date=June 27, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721225447/http://elections.nytimes.com/2009/results/other.html |archive-date=July 21, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Out of the initial $343,000 in contributions, NOM provided some $160,000.<ref name="baywindows.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=95982 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110612132105/http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=95982 |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 12, 2011 |title=NOM Under Investigation |last=Keen |first=Lisa |work=Bay Windows |date=September 4, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010 }}</ref> | ||
NOM contributed over $1.6 million to Stand For Marriage Maine; by reports as of October 2009, NOM had contributed 63% of that group's funding.<ref name="mainecampaignfinance.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.mainecampaignfinance.com/public/report_list.asp?TYPE=PAC&ID=4477 |title=Public Campaign Finance Page for the State of Maine |publisher=Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices | |
NOM contributed over $1.6 million to Stand For Marriage Maine; by reports as of October 2009, NOM had contributed 63% of that group's funding.<ref name="mainecampaignfinance.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.mainecampaignfinance.com/public/report_list.asp?TYPE=PAC&ID=4477 |title=Public Campaign Finance Page for the State of Maine |publisher=Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices |access-date=March 8, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130111054908/http://www.mainecampaignfinance.com/public/report_list.asp?TYPE=PAC&ID=4477 |archive-date=January 11, 2013 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref name="Bangor Daily News">{{cite news |url=http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/126665.html |title=Money fueling battle over gay marriage |newspaper=Bangor Daily News |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120719052413/http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/126665.html |archive-date=July 19, 2012 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
NOM has brought a number of ] to prevent being required |
NOM has brought a number of ] to prevent being required to release the names of its donors funding Stand For Marriage Maine.{{Citation needed|date=August 2023}} In 2015, NOM released a campaign disclosure report after a state supreme court ruling on its release.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Sharp |first1=David |title=Group turns over donor list from gay marriage fight in Maine |url=https://www.nydailynews.com/sdut-group-turns-over-donor-list-from-gay-marriage-2015aug24-story.html |access-date=18 August 2023 |work=] |agency=] |date=24 August 2015}}</ref> | ||
===Advertising campaigns=== | ===Advertising campaigns=== | ||
On April 8, 2009, NOM began a "2 Million for Marriage" (2M4M) initiative with the intention of organizing two million activists nationwide.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&content_id={330D2C59-9261-4D30-8B0F-3E6168CA9AFD} |title=NOM Launches Nationwide "Two Million for Marriage" Initiative! |publisher=Nationformarriage.org |date=April 8, 2009 | |
On April 8, 2009, NOM began a "2 Million for Marriage" (2M4M) initiative with the intention of organizing two million activists nationwide.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&content_id={330D2C59-9261-4D30-8B0F-3E6168CA9AFD} |title=NOM Launches Nationwide "Two Million for Marriage" Initiative! |publisher=Nationformarriage.org |date=April 8, 2009 |access-date=June 16, 2011}}</ref> When NOM used the abbreviation "2M4M" for their "2 Million for Marriage" campaign, the media noted that in personal ads, "2M4M" is code for two men seeking a third male sexual partner. NOM did not secure the domain name and other net resources that use the "2M4M" term. Christopher Ambler, a consultant in rapid web development who characterizes himself as a "happily married straight guy", purchased the domain "2M4M.org"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.2M4M.org |archive-url=https://archive.today/20090414041913/http://www.2m4m.org/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 14, 2009 |title=de beste bron van informatie over 2 m 4 m. Deze website is te koop! |publisher=2m4m.org |access-date=June 16, 2011}}</ref> and branded it as "Two Men For Marriage," running material counter to NOM's 2M4M aims.<ref>{{cite web | title= Anti-Gay Rights Group Calls its Marriage Campaign '2M4M' | url= http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/anti-gay-rights-calls-its-marriage.php | year= 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=National Organization For Marriage Or Two Men For Marriage? | url= http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/4/10/718714/-National-Organization-For-Marriage-Or-Two-Men-For-Marriage }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title= About 2M4M.org| url= http://www.2m4m.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=84&Itemid=91 | archive-url= https://archive.today/20090415100008/http://www.2m4m.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=84&Itemid=91 | url-status= dead | archive-date= April 15, 2009 |date= April 9, 2009 |access-date=May 16, 2009}}</ref> | ||
====Gathering Storm==== | ====Gathering Storm==== | ||
{{main|Gathering Storm (advertisement)}} | {{main|Gathering Storm (advertisement)}} | ||
The 2M4M campaign used an advertisement, "Gathering Storm", in which actors, primarily Mormons from Arizona,<ref name=Blanco2009/> standing against a dramatic storm-cloud background, voiced opposition to ].<ref name="Rich">{{Cite news |last = Rich |first = Frank |author-link = Frank Rich |title = The Bigots' Last Hurrah |newspaper = ] |pages = WK10 |date = April 19, 2009 |url = |
The 2M4M campaign used an advertisement, "Gathering Storm", in which actors, primarily Mormons from Arizona,<ref name=Blanco2009/> standing against a dramatic storm-cloud background, voiced opposition to ].<ref name="Rich">{{Cite news |last = Rich |first = Frank |author-link = Frank Rich |title = The Bigots' Last Hurrah |newspaper = ] |pages = WK10 |date = April 19, 2009 |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/opinion/19Rich.html}}</ref><ref name=bpwinning>{{cite news|last=Foust |first=Michael |title=A winning strategy to stop 'gay marriage'? |url=http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=30303 |access-date=October 22, 2010 |newspaper=] |date=April 17, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320070909/http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=30303 |archive-date=March 20, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
The ], a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) lobbying group and political action committee, described the ad saying that, in it, "actors make disproven claims about marriage for lesbian and gay couples."<ref name=HRC>{{cite press release |
The ], a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) lobbying group and political action committee, described the ad saying that, in it, "actors make disproven claims about marriage for lesbian and gay couples."<ref name=HRC>{{cite press release|title=Human Rights Campaign Exposes National Organization for Marriage's Fake Ad for Fake Problems |url=http://www.hrc.org/12470.htm |publisher=] |date=April 8, 2009 |access-date=April 18, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110426212934/http://www.hrc.org/12470.htm |archive-date=April 26, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=New campaign fights same-sex marriage |first=Ben |last=Smith |author-link=Ben Smith (journalist) |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0409/New_campaign_fights_samesex_marriage.html |newspaper=] |date=April 8, 2009 |access-date=April 19, 2011}}<br/>{{cite web |url=http://thinkprogress.org/2009/04/09/gathering-storm-auditions/ |title=HRC releases audition tapes of 'Gathering Storm' actors. |last=Terkel |first=Amanda |date=April 9, 2009 |work=] |publisher=] |access-date=April 18, 2011}}<br/>{{cite news |title=Winning the Freedom to Marry? Cue the Attack on the Gays! |first=Evan |last=Wolfson |author-link=Evan Wolfson |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/evan-wolfson/winning-the-freedom-to-ma_b_185767.html |work=Huffington Post |date=April 13, 2009 |access-date=April 19, 2011}}</ref> | ||
''New York Times'' columnist ] described the "Gathering Storm" advertisement as "an Internet camp classic",<ref name="Rich" /> and it was parodied by ], the website ],<ref>{{cite |
''New York Times'' columnist ] described the "Gathering Storm" advertisement as "an Internet camp classic",<ref name="Rich" /> and it was parodied by ], the website ],<ref>{{cite magazine |first= John |last= Young |title= 'Gathering Storm' spoofs: Which celebrity gay-marriage parody rains more laughs? |url= http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/04/gay-storm-ad.html |magazine= Entertainment Weekly |publisher= PopWatch blog |date= April 21, 2009 |access-date= April 22, 2009 |archive-date= April 25, 2009 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090425044138/http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/04/gay-storm-ad.html |url-status= dead }}</ref> and in the '']'' episode "]". | ||
====Other advertisements==== | ====Other advertisements==== | ||
On April 30, 2009, NOM and ] launched another ad campaign against gay marriage, called "No Offense". In the ad, they object to being characterized as "outright bigots" because of their stance.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=6960015 |title=National Organization for Marriage and Carrie Prejean Launch New Ad Showing Intolerance of Gay Marriage Activists, Illustrating Threats to Religious Liberty |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |date=April 30, 2009 | |
On April 30, 2009, NOM and beauty pageant winner ] launched another ad campaign against gay marriage, called "No Offense". In the ad, they object to being characterized as "outright bigots" because of their stance.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=6960015 |title=National Organization for Marriage and Carrie Prejean Launch New Ad Showing Intolerance of Gay Marriage Activists, Illustrating Threats to Religious Liberty |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |date=April 30, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010}}</ref> After semi-nude photos of Prejean were posted on the Internet, causing some to accuse NOM of hypocrisy,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://vancouversun.com/entertainment/Miss+California+Carrie+Prejean+semi+nude+photo+controversy/1565866/story.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090523081045/http://www.vancouversun.com/Entertainment/Miss+California+Carrie+Prejean+semi+nude+photo+controversy/1565866/story.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 23, 2009 |title=Miss California Carrie Prejean in semi-nude photo controversy |work=The Vancouver Sun |date=May 5, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> NOM issued a press release stating that Prejean had appeared with NOM as a private citizen and not as a spokesperson.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=6962109 |title=Statement on Carrie Prejean |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |access-date=March 8, 2010}}</ref> In the wake of the revelation that Prejean had made masturbation videos, NOM removed reference to the video from the front page of their website.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=4870&MediaType=1&Category=26 |title=Anti-Gay Marriage Group Distances Itself From Prejean |publisher=On Top Magazine |date=November 16, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010}}</ref> | ||
On May 28, 2009, NOM rolled out an advertising campaign in New York, including a video spot. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' described the spot as listing a "litany of grievances" as an "ominous score" plays, with a potentially embarrassing error for a campaign based on education: misspelling ''marriage'' as ''marraige''.<ref>{{cite |
On May 28, 2009, NOM rolled out an advertising campaign in New York, including a video spot. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' described the spot as listing a "litany of grievances" as an "ominous score" plays, with a potentially embarrassing error for a campaign based on education: misspelling ''marriage'' as ''{{typo|marraige}}''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://features.csmonitor.com/innovation/2009/05/28/conservative-activists-turn-to-web-for-traction-denounce-gay-marraige/ |title=Conservative activists turn to web for traction; denounce gay 'marriage' |newspaper=The Christian Science Monitor |date=May 28, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010}}</ref> | ||
During the ], NOM released an ad criticizing Democratic candidate ] for his support for allowing transgender individuals access to bathrooms that reflect their gender identity. The ad claimed that doing so would give sexual predators easy access to children and other potential victims.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/national-organization-marriage-releases-anti-transgender-ad-n679016|title=National Organization for Marriage releases anti-trans bathroom ad|website=NBC News}}</ref> | |||
=== New York Congressional phone campaign === | === New York Congressional phone campaign === | ||
NOM spent over $112,000 on a ] phone campaign<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tips-q.com/files/u1/29935396658.pdf |title=NOM's expenditure report |publisher=Tips-q.com | |
NOM spent over $112,000 on a ] phone campaign<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tips-q.com/files/u1/29935396658.pdf |title=NOM's expenditure report |publisher=Tips-q.com |access-date=June 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717064330/http://www.tips-q.com/files/u1/29935396658.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2011 }}</ref> for ] candidate ] in the ]. After pro-same-sex-marriage Republican candidate ] withdrew from the race,<ref>{{cite news|author=Provided photo |url=http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2009/07/gop_picks_candidate_for_congre.html |title=GOP picks candidate for congressional seat, attacks likely Democratic hopeful |newspaper=The Post-Standard |access-date=March 8, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20091031/BLOGS09/910319996/BLOGS09 |title=Scozzafava Suspends Campaign |publisher=Watertown Daily Times |date=October 31, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091102084240/http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20091031/BLOGS09/910319996/BLOGS09 |archive-date=November 2, 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Hoffman lost to Democrat ],<ref>, ''Associated Press'', November 4, 2009 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091111123837/http://www.9wsyr.com/content/news/breakingnews/Hoffman-concedes-23rd-Congressional-race-to-Owens/krJ1b4A4oESpLUslAa_A9g.cspx |date=November 11, 2009 }}</ref> who also opposed gay marriage, by a 2.3% margin.<ref name="Observer">{{cite news|url=http://www.observer.com/4850/meet-bill-owens-dccc-approved-non-democrat-house|title=Meet Bill Owens, a DCCC-Approved Non-Democrat for the House|last=Vielkind|first=Jimmy|date=August 11, 2009|work=]|access-date=December 11, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091106034845/http://www.observer.com/4850/meet-bill-owens-dccc-approved-non-democrat-house|archive-date=November 6, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20091216/NEWS03/312169963 |title=Special election results certified |publisher=Watertown Daily Times |date=December 16, 2009 |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716223932/http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20091216/NEWS03/312169963 |archive-date=July 16, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref> State senators said that this congressional race affected the New York State Senate's December 2, 2009 vote against same-sex marriage legislation;<ref>{{cite news|last=Precious |first=Tom |url=http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/880990.html?imw=Y |title=Gay marriage not likely to come to Senate again soon : Albany |newspaper=The Buffalo News |access-date=March 8, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091205191059/http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/880990.html?imw=Y |archive-date=December 5, 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/nyregion/06marriage.html?_r=1&ref=nyregion | work=The New York Times | title=Marriage for Gays on Agenda in New York | first=Danny | last=Hakim | date=November 6, 2009 | access-date=April 1, 2010}}</ref> all 30 Republican state senators voted "no".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ny1.com/content/news_beats/politics/130717/gay-leaders-say-despite-gop-flip--state-senate-could-pass-marriage-equality/ |title=Advocates Say Despite GOP Flip, State Senate Could Pass Marriage Equality |publisher=NY1.com |access-date=June 16, 2011 }}{{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Following her unsuccessful campaign, Scozzafava acknowledged that her name had begun being used as a verb: "scozzafavaed".<ref>{{cite web |author=Rachel Slajda |url=http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/scozzafava-my-names-a-verb-now.php |title=Scozzafava: 'My Name's A Verb Now' | TPM LiveWire |publisher=Tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com |date=November 10, 2009 |access-date=June 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110305013110/http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/scozzafava-my-names-a-verb-now.php |archive-date=March 5, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>Horowitz, Jason. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120322012123/http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20091115/CURR04/311159984/ |date=March 22, 2012 }} ''Watertown Daily Times.''</ref> When the gay Republican organization ] had a booth at the 2010 ], Brown commented, "e have a message for GOProud on marriage: If you try to elect pro-gay-marriage Republicans, we will Dede Scozzafava them."<ref>{{cite web |last=Tuma |first=Mary |url=http://washingtonindependent.com/77138/goproud-director-national-organization-for-marriage-are-pansies-wusses |title=GOProud Director: National Organization for Marriage Are 'Pansies,' 'Wusses' |publisher=The Washington Independent |access-date=June 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111111151829/http://washingtonindependent.com/77138/goproud-director-national-organization-for-marriage-are-pansies-wusses |archive-date=November 11, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> In addition, ] has used the phrase "the Dede effect" to describe Republican lawmakers' fear of alienating their constituents by voting for same-sex marriage legislation.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120203910.html | newspaper=The Washington Post | title=N.Y. State Senate votes down gay marriage bill by wide margin | first=Karl | last=Vick | date=December 3, 2009 | access-date=May 1, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=31672 |title=Baptist Press – N.Y., N.J., groups race to pass 'gay marriage' by year's end – News with a Christian Perspective |publisher=Bpnews.net |date=November 12, 2009 |access-date=June 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320034955/http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=31672 |archive-date=March 20, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
===Summer for Marriage Tour=== | ===Summer for Marriage Tour=== | ||
] at the Summer For Marriage Tour]] | ] at the Summer For Marriage Tour]] | ||
In 2010, NOM staged a 23-city tour holding rallies against same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url= |
In 2010, NOM staged a 23-city tour holding rallies against same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129110668&ps=cprs |title=Same-Sex-Marriage Fight Hits The Road |website=NPR |publisher=NPR |access-date=June 16, 2011}}</ref> The rallies attracted supporters and pro-gay marriage protesters.<ref name=tourprotests /> At many stops along the tour, NOM supporters were outnumbered by counter-protesters supporting same-sex marriage; in Atlanta, LGBT rights supporters outnumbered opponents of same-sex marriage by a ratio of ten to one.<ref name=tourprotests>{{cite news |title=Opposing Groups Hold Rallies On Marriage Views |newspaper=] |location=Madison, Wisconsin |date=July 27, 2010 |url=http://www.channel3000.com/news/24415030/detail.html |access-date=August 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100831181911/http://www.channel3000.com/news/24415030/detail.html |archive-date=August 31, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}<br>{{cite web |url=http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=204486 |title=Hundreds march to protest National Organization for Marriage rally |date=July 28, 2010 |work=WisPolitics.com |access-date=August 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719084804/http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=204486 |archive-date=July 19, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}<br>{{cite news |title=National Organization for Marriage trying to raise money in Iowa |first=Jason |last=Hancock |newspaper=] |date=July 28, 2010 |url=http://iowaindependent.com/40010/national-organization-for-marriage-trying-to-raise-money-in-iowa |access-date=August 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130126155527/http://iowaindependent.com/40010/national-organization-for-marriage-trying-to-raise-money-in-iowa |archive-date=January 26, 2013 |df=mdy-all }}<br>{{cite news |title=Entangling marriage into a political jujitsu |first=Steve |last=Chapman |newspaper=] |date=July 29, 2010 |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-oped-0729-chapman-20100729,0,2704152.column |access-date=August 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100801084117/http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-oped-0729-chapman-20100729,0,2704152.column |archive-date=August 1, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}<br>{{cite news |title=National Organization for Marriage, NOM, Rallies Under Gold Dome |first=Jim |last=Burress |author2=Aleck Ragsdale |newspaper=WABE |location=Atlanta, Georgia |date=August 8, 2010 |url=http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wabe/news.newsmain/article/1/0/1685585/Atlanta/National.Organization.for.Marriage..NOM..Rallies.Under.Gold.Dome |access-date=August 18, 2010 }}{{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}<br>{{cite news |title=Gay marriage critics roll in |first=Matt |last=Ehlers |newspaper=] |location=Raleigh, North Carolina |date=August 11, 2010 |url=http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/08/11/623487/gay-marriage-critics-roll-in.html |access-date=August 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121003153927/http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/08/11/623487/gay-marriage-critics-roll-in.html |archive-date=October 3, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> The tour ended with a rally at the ] in Washington, D.C., while pro-gay marriage activists held a simultaneous event at the ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Key |first=Michael |url=http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/08/15/d-c-sees-national-organization-for-marriage-rally-counter-protest/ |title=D.C. sees National Organization for Marriage rally, counter protest |publisher=Washingtonblade.com |date=August 16, 2010 |access-date=June 16, 2011}}</ref> | ||
After ] and ], the surviving members of ], discovered that NOM had been using their recording of "]" rallies in this tour, they sent a letter to Brown requesting that NOM cease using their recording, stating that NOM's philosophy was "directly contrary to the advocacy position" held by the group.<ref>{{cite news |title=Peter, Paul, & Mary's Warning to NOM |author=Garcia, Michelle |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/08/31/Peter_Paul_and_Mary_to_NOM_Cease_and_Decist/ |newspaper=] |date=August 31, 2010 | |
After ] and ], the surviving members of ], discovered that NOM had been using their recording of "]" rallies in this tour, they sent a letter to Brown requesting that NOM cease using their recording, stating that NOM's philosophy was "directly contrary to the advocacy position" held by the group.<ref>{{cite news |title=Peter, Paul, & Mary's Warning to NOM |author=Garcia, Michelle |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/08/31/Peter_Paul_and_Mary_to_NOM_Cease_and_Decist/ |newspaper=] |date=August 31, 2010 |access-date=April 10, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100905174716/http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/08/31/Peter_Paul_and_Mary_to_NOM_Cease_and_Decist/ |archive-date=September 5, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Similarly, after ] was informed that NOM had used his song "]" at one of their events, his publicist wrote a letter (at his instruction) stating Mellencamp's support for same-sex marriage and asking that NOM stop using his music.<ref>{{cite news |title=John Mellencamp Doesn't Like NOM |author=<!--Not stated--> |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/10/09/John_Mellencamp_Doesnt_Like_NOM/ |newspaper=] |date=October 9, 2010 |access-date=April 10, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101011124833/http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/10/09/John_Mellencamp_Doesnt_Like_NOM/ |archive-date=October 11, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
===Campaign finance lawsuit=== | ===Campaign finance lawsuit=== | ||
NOM filed a lawsuit in US district court, on free speech grounds, seeking the right to run ads in the ] governor's race without complying with that state's campaign finance laws, including both campaign financing contribution limits and reporting requirements. In October 2010 the suit was dismissed; the court called the filing "disorganized, vague and poorly constructed" and gave the group one week to refile the lawsuit.<ref>{{cite news|title=Anti-gay marriage group ordered to refile RI suit | NOM filed a lawsuit in US district court, on free speech grounds, seeking the right to run ads in the ] governor's race without complying with that state's campaign finance laws, including both campaign financing contribution limits and reporting requirements. In October 2010 the suit was dismissed; the court called the filing "disorganized, vague and poorly constructed" and gave the group one week to refile the lawsuit.<ref>{{cite news|title=Anti-gay marriage group ordered to refile RI suit |url=https://www.boston.com/news/local/rhode_island/articles/2010/10/01/anti_gay_marriage_group_ordered_to_refile_ri_suit/ |access-date=October 3, 2010 |newspaper=] |date=October 1, 2010 |agency=] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101010112943/http://www.boston.com/news/local/rhode_island/articles/2010/10/01/anti_gay_marriage_group_ordered_to_refile_ri_suit/ |archive-date=October 10, 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Gregg |first=Katherine |title=Opponents of same-sex marriage file suit to allow unlimited campaign spending in Rhode Island |url=http://www.projo.com/news/content/same_sex_marriage_lawsuit_09-28-10_KGK3K0D_v26.2308df0.html |access-date=October 3, 2010 |newspaper=] |date=September 28, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101001225757/http://www.projo.com/news/content/same_sex_marriage_lawsuit_09-28-10_KGK3K0D_v26.2308df0.html |archive-date=October 1, 2010 }}</ref> NOM appealed to federal court, who ruled against them.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.providencejournal.com/breaking-news/2011/08/appeals-upholds-lower-court-ru.html |title=Lower court ruling on campaign disclosures is upheld |newspaper=The Providence Journal |date=August 11, 2011 |access-date=October 24, 2011}}</ref> | ||
|url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/rhode_island/articles/2010/10/01/anti_gay_marriage_group_ordered_to_refile_ri_suit/|accessdate=October 3, 2010|newspaper=]|date=October 1, 2010|agency=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Gregg|first=Katherine|title=Opponents of same-sex marriage file suit to allow unlimited campaign spending in Rhode Island|url=http://www.projo.com/news/content/same_sex_marriage_lawsuit_09-28-10_KGK3K0D_v26.2308df0.html|accessdate=October 3, 2010|newspaper=]|date=September 28, 2010}}{{dead link|date=November 2011}}</ref> NOM appealed to federal court, who ruled against them.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.providencejournal.com/breaking-news/2011/08/appeals-upholds-lower-court-ru.html |title=Lower court ruling on campaign disclosures is upheld |publisher=The Providence Journal |date=August 11, 2011 |accessdate=October 24, 2011}}</ref> | |||
===Civil union opposition=== | ===Civil union opposition=== | ||
NOM has opposed ] recognition, calling it "a direct threat to marriage and the religious liberties" and stating that "civil union statutes across the country have been used to sue business owners and professionals who run their practices by their deeply held religious beliefs."<ref name="directthreat">{{ |
NOM has opposed ] recognition, calling it "a direct threat to marriage and the religious liberties" and stating that "civil union statutes across the country have been used to sue business owners and professionals who run their practices by their deeply held religious beliefs."<ref name="directthreat">{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationformarriage.org/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.7535441/k.6CD6/Civil_Union_Floor_Vote/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx|title=National Organization for Marriage|website=www.nationformarriage.org}}</ref> It has campaigned against the passage of Illinois's Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, SB 1716.<ref name="unions">{{cite news |title=Anti-gay NOM expands target, opposes civil unions |author=SDGLN staff |url=http://sdgln.com/causes/2010/11/23/anti-gay-nom-expands-target-opposes-civil-unions |newspaper=San Diego Gay and Lesbian News |date=November 23, 2010 |access-date=April 13, 2011}}</ref> | ||
===Iowa judge retention vote campaign=== | ===Iowa judge retention vote campaign=== | ||
On November 2, 2010, NOM ran a bus tour through Iowa campaigning for removal of three ] justices then up for a retention vote, following the court's unanimous decision in '']''; the retention vote was "the most controversial...and one of the closest" races on the ballot.<ref>{{cite news|title=Voting out the justices: What Iowans are saying|newspaper=The Des Moines Register|date=November 3, 2010|url=http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20101103/NEWS09/101103027| |
On November 2, 2010, NOM ran a bus tour through Iowa campaigning for removal of three ] justices then up for a retention vote, following the court's unanimous decision in '']''; the retention vote was "the most controversial...and one of the closest" races on the ballot.<ref>{{cite news|title=Voting out the justices: What Iowans are saying|newspaper=The Des Moines Register|date=November 3, 2010|url=http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20101103/NEWS09/101103027|access-date=January 14, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120730090611/http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20101103/NEWS09/101103027|archive-date=July 30, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> All three justices lost the retention vote, the first time any judge had lost that vote since Iowa initiated the retention system in 1962.<ref>{{cite news|last=Schulte|first=Grant|title=Iowans dismiss three justices|newspaper=The Des Moines Register|date=November 3, 2010|url=http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20101103/NEWS09/11030390/|access-date=January 14, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120730150201/http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20101103/NEWS09/11030390/|archive-date=July 30, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | ||
===New York same-sex marriage opposition=== | ===New York same-sex marriage opposition=== | ||
NOM actively opposed legalization of ] in 2011. The group sponsored a rally in the ] in May 2011 with state Senator ], a Democrat. After same-sex marriage was legalized in the state by the legislature in June 2011, NOM pledged to spend $2 million to defeat the four Republicans who voted for the bill to legalize it,<ref> |
NOM actively opposed legalization of ] in 2011. The group sponsored a rally in the ] in May 2011 with state Senator ], a Democrat. After same-sex marriage was legalized in the state by the legislature in June 2011, NOM pledged to spend $2 million to defeat the four Republicans who voted for the bill to legalize it,<ref>{{cite news|author1=Eckholm, Erik |author2=Seelye, Katharine Q. |title=New York's Approval of Same-Sex Marriage Spurs Opponents for New Fights|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/us/politics/03gay.html|work=The New York Times|date=July 2, 2011}}</ref> and erected signs in the districts of those senators, warning "You're Next". Wealthy same-sex marriage supporters vowed to finance the targeted senators.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/nyregion/4-republicans-who-voted-for-gay-marriage-set-to-receive-aid.html | work=The New York Times | first=Thomas | last=Kaplan | title=4 Republicans Who Voted for Gay Marriage Set to Receive Aid | date=October 12, 2011}}</ref> | ||
NOM supported four "Let the People Vote" rallies later in July of the same year, with the stated purpose of having the voters decide the issue versus the bill passed by the state's legislature. | NOM supported four "Let the People Vote" rallies later in July of the same year, with the stated purpose of having the voters decide the issue versus the bill passed by the state's legislature. | ||
===North Carolina Amendment 1=== | ===North Carolina Amendment 1=== | ||
NOM provided more than $300,000 to the committee supporting North Carolina's ], a 2012 referendum which would alter the state's constitution to forbid marriage and all other recognition for same-sex couples.<ref>{{cite news| url= |
NOM provided more than $300,000 to the committee supporting North Carolina's ], a 2012 referendum which would alter the state's constitution to forbid marriage and all other recognition for same-sex couples.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-mct-big-money-fuels-north-carolina-amendment-campaigns-20120503,0,2168119.story | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221127045533/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-mct-big-money-fuels-north-carolina-amendment-campaigns-20120503,0,2168119.story | url-status=dead | archive-date=November 27, 2022 | work=Chicago Tribune | title=Topic Galleries }}</ref> | ||
===2012 presidential pledge=== | ===2012 presidential pledge=== | ||
On August 3, 2011, NOM unveiled a pledge for ]. Signers |
On August 3, 2011, NOM unveiled a pledge for ]. Signers pledged that they would support a ], appoint federal judges who are ] and thus "reject the idea our Founding Fathers inserted a right to gay marriage in our Constitution",<ref name=pledge>{{cite web|title=Perry Signed Pledge|url=http://www.nomblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Perry-Signed-Pledge.pdf}}</ref> defend the ] in court, "establish a presidential commission on religious liberty to investigate and document reports of Americans who have been harassed or threatened for exercising key civil rights to organize, to speak, to donate or to vote for marriage",<ref name="pledge"/> and "advance legalization to return to the people of the ] their right to vote on marriage."<ref name="pledge"/><ref name="USATpledge">{{cite news|url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/08/mitt-romney-gay-marriage-pledge-/1 |title=Romney, Bachmann, Santorum sign marriage pledge |work=USA Today |date=August 4, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nomblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Romney-Signed-Pledge.pdf |title=NOM Pledge |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Smith |first=Ben |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0811/Romney_signs_marriage_pledge.html?showall |title=Romney signs marriage pledge |publisher=Politico |date=August 4, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref> This pledge was signed by candidates ], ], ], ], and ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nomblog.com/16745/ |title=Gingrich Signs NOM's Marriage Pledge, Leaving Only Paul Among Major Candidates Not To Have Signed |publisher=NOM Blog |date=December 15, 2011 |access-date=February 28, 2012}}</ref> (who initially declined), along with ];<ref>{{cite web |url=http://iowaindependent.com/59720/pawlenty-signs-nom-marriage-pledge |title=Pawlenty signs NOM marriage pledge |publisher=Iowa Independent |access-date=February 28, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111215062009/http://iowaindependent.com/59720/pawlenty-signs-nom-marriage-pledge |archive-date=December 15, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> ] and ] chose not to sign.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/gay-marriage-has-boosted-iowas-economy-study-concludes/ |title=Gay Marriage Has Boosted Iowa's Economy, Study Concludes |publisher=ABC |location=USA |date=December 8, 2011 |access-date=February 28, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Holley |first=Joe |url=https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Perry-backs-gay-marriage-ban-2143570.php |title=Perry signs pledge backing gay marriage ban – Houston Chronicle |work=Houston Chronicle |date=August 26, 2011 |access-date=February 28, 2012}}</ref> During the Iowa primary campaign, NOM aired a TV ad targeting Paul, contrasting his failure to pledge with the activities of "the major presidential candidates", thus implying that Paul was not truly in contention in the primary campaign.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/28/commercial-introduces-gay-marriage-as-an-issue-in-the-iowa-caucuses/ | work=The New York Times | first=Jeremy W. | last=Peters | title=Commercial Introduces Gay Marriage as an Issue in the Iowa Caucuses | date=December 28, 2011}}</ref> | ||
===Oregon intercession=== | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2013}} | |||
NOM attempted repeatedly to intercede in the legalization of ]. The group requested to be allowed to act as defendants in the state court case that ultimately found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional, but were denied by the judge as lacking standing, a ruling that was confirmed by the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://portlandtribune.com/pt/9-news/231622-95851-appeals-court-foes-of-same-sex-marriage-cant-intervene|title=Appeals court: Foes of same-sex marriage can't intervene|first=Peter|last=Wong|website=]}}</ref> After the ruling that started same-sex marriage in the state, NOM filed a request with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking that the state court's ruling be stayed, to allow NOM to further pursue its case for being an intercessor, and that the matter be reviewed by the Supreme Court.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://portlandtribune.com/pt/9-news/222267-83632-group-asks-supreme-court-to-block-oregons-same-sex-marriage-ruling |title=Group asks Supreme Court to block Oregon's same-sex marriage ruling |newspaper=Portland Tribune |date=2014-05-27 |access-date=2014-06-01}}</ref> The request was denied.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/04/supreme-court-gay-lesbian-marriage-oregon/9974419/ |title=Justices won't stop gay marriages in Oregon |newspaper=USA Today |date=2014-05-29 |access-date=2014-06-04}}</ref> | |||
==Disclosure violation allegations== | |||
In 2009, ] (CAH) filed a formal complaint with the IRS against NOM, saying that NOM had refused to make its IRS 990 forms public, as required by law. CAH representatives went to "the Princeton, New Jersey, offices of the National Organization for Marriage twice to get copies of their IRS 990 reports, to no avail," said CAH's president, ]. "Then our representative, Ben Katzenberg, sent two certified letters to the NOM office on March 18, 2009, requesting its two 990 forms. Federal law requires NOM to furnish copies of these IRS filings within 30 days after the request has been received. And 40 days later, still no 990s."<ref>{{cite news |title=Antigay Group Hiding Mormon Cash? |first=Neal |last=Broverman |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/05/04/Antigay_Group_Hiding_Mormon_Cash_/ |newspaper=] |date=May 4, 2009 |accessdate=April 19, 2011}}</ref> NOM has since posted 990 forms for 2007 and 2008 on their website.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.5493925/k.A78A/Financial_Reports.htm |title=Financial Reports |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |accessdate=August 15, 2010}}</ref> | |||
===March For Marriage=== | |||
In March 2009, Karger filed a complaint with the ] alleging that the National Organization for Marriage was established by ] in order to direct church funds toward the passage of Proposition 8.<ref>{{cite news |title=Prop. 8 foes accuse Mormons of establishing front group |first=Brian |last=Joseph |url=http://totalbuzz.ocregister.com/2009/03/19/prop-8-foes-accuse-mormons-of-establishing-front-group/14727/ |newspaper=] |date=March 19, 2009 |accessdate=April 22, 2011}}<br/>{{cite news |title=Antigay Group Hiding Mormon Cash? |first=Neal |last=Broverman |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/05/04/Antigay_Group_Hiding_Mormon_Cash_/ |newspaper=] |date=May 4, 2009 |accessdate=April 22, 2011}}</ref> A church spokesman and NOM's then-president Maggie Gallagher both denied the allegations.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11952191 |title= Leaked memos: Gay rights group make new charges over LDS Prop 8 role |publisher= Salt Lake Tribune | |||
NOM organized protest marches against same-sex marriage in Washington, DC, in 2013,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?311757-1/national-organization-marriage-nom-rally-national-mall|title=National Organization for Marriage (NOM) Rally on the National Mall | C-SPAN.org|website=www.c-span.org}}</ref> 2014,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2014/06/19/twitter-hrc-mock-crowd-noms-march-marriage|title=Twitter, HRC Mock 'Crowd' at NOM's March for Marriage|date=June 19, 2014|website=www.advocate.com}}</ref> 2015,<ref name="mfm2015" /> 2016,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=28639|title=March for Marriage to protest Obergefell decision : News Headlines|website=www.catholicculture.org}}</ref> and 2017.<ref name="MfM2017">{{Cite web|url=https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/march-for-marriage-draws-tens-but-promises-ultimate-victory-over-obergefell/|title=March For Marriage Draws Tens, But Promises Ultimate Victory Over Obergefell|website=Right Wing Watch|date=June 17, 2017 }}</ref> The 2015 March For Marriage took place on April 25, the Saturday before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a set of cases related to same-sex marriage.<ref name="mfm2015">{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/thousands-voice-support-of-state-laws-against-same-sex-marriage/2015/04/25/c4e3821a-eb84-11e4-aae1-d642717d8afa_story.html|title=Thousands on Mall voice support of state laws against same-sex marriage|newspaper=Washington Post}}</ref> About 100 people attended the 2016 event, including counterprotestors.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/dc/protesters-hold-rally-against-gay-marriage-in-dc/65-255942538|title=Protesters hold rally against gay marriage in DC|website=WUSA}}</ref> About 50 attended in 2017.<ref name="MfM2017" /> | |||
|accessdate=April 22, 2011 |last=Tony |first=Semerad |archiveurl=http://replay.web.archive.org/20090403043207/http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11952191? |archivedate=April 3, 2009 }}</ref> | |||
===IRS release of donor information=== | |||
Accusations by Karger also lead the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices to schedule consideration of an investigation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=95729 |title=Iowa and Maine question National Organization for Marriage's funding sources |publisher=EDGE Boston |date=August 31, 2009 |accessdate=March 8, 2010}}</ref> Maine laws require organizations that solicit more than $5,000 for a ballot question campaign to file disclosure reports.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite web|url=http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/126297.html |title=Anti-gay marriage group sues state |publisher=Bangor Daily News |accessdate=March 8, 2010}}</ref> NOM contributed $1.6 million to ] as of October 23, 2009, without filing any disclosure reports.<ref name="Bangor Daily News"/> The commission approved an investigation on a 3–2 vote, overriding the recommendation of their staff.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=4238|title=Maine will scrutinize anti-gay groups|first=Lisa|last=Keen|date=October 1, 2009|work=]}}</ref> NOM responded by filing suit, claiming that the state's election laws violate the ].<ref name="Bangor Daily News"/> NOM, arguing that their lawsuit was likely to succeed, sought a federal restraining order to avoid having to provide donor names before the date of the balloting, which U.S. District Court Judge ] denied.<ref name=nyt20091030> ''The New York Times'', October 29, 2009</ref> In January 2010, representatives of the group were subpoenaed to appear before the commission. In February, the group requested that those subpoenas be dropped, but the commission voted unanimously to deny that request.<ref>, ''Kennebec Journal'', February 27, 2010</ref> On May 23, 2010, Magistrate Judge John H. Rich III of the U.S. District Court of Maine ordered NOM to submit bank statements and similar documentation, covering the dates from January 1, 2009 forward, to Maine's Commission on Government Ethics and Election Practices within seven days.<ref>, ''Maine Public Broadcasting Network'', May 25, 2010]</ref><ref> United States District Court, District of Maine.</ref> On June 24, 2010, the commission rejected NOM's claim that the commission lacked appropriate authority and should cease its investigation.<ref>{{cite web|author=10:10 pm |url=http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/146890.html |title=Commission: Marriage group probe to go on – Maine Politics – Bangor Daily News |publisher=Bangordailynews.com |date=June 24, 2010 |accessdate=June 16, 2011}}</ref> In February 2011, Hornby issued a summary judgment ruling that Maine's disclosure law was valid, a decision NOM appealed and lost in August 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mpbn.net/News/MaineNewsArchive/tabid/181/ctl/ViewItem/mid/3475/ItemId/17580/Default.aspx |title=Court Sides with Maine in Election Law Dispute |publisher=Mpbn.net |date=November 8, 2011 |accessdate=December 4, 2011}}</ref> In September 2011, the federal court denied NOM's request to have the case reheard,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chron.com/news/article/Court-nixes-rehearing-in-Maine-PAC-reporting-case-2159493.php |title=Court nixes rehearing in Maine PAC reporting case |work=Houston Chronicle |date=September 7, 2011 |accessdate=December 4, 2011}}</ref> and in February 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court rejected NOM's request to hear the case.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/27/44206.htm |title=Courthouse News Service |publisher=Courthousenews.com |date=January 31, 2012 |accessdate=February 28, 2012}}</ref> In January 2012, NOM lost another federal appeal on a different aspect of their Maine case, but said that they would take that issue to the Supreme Court.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/31/nom_loses_campaign_disclosure_appeal/ | work=The Boston Globe | first=David | last=Sharp | title=Anti-gay-marriage group loses Maine list appeal | date=January 31, 2012}}</ref> The Supreme Court declined to hear the case on October 1, 2012.<ref>{{cite news|last=Long|first=Robert|title=U.S. Supreme Court rejects anti-gay marriage group's appeal of Maine's donor disclosure law|url=http://bangordailynews.com/2012/10/01/politics/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-anti-gay-marriage-groups-appeal-of-maines-donor-disclosure-law/|accessdate=October 1, 2012 |newspaper=Bangor News|date=October 1, 2012}}</ref> After hearing arguments on April 11, 2013, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on May 30 affirmed the lower court ruling and rejected NOM's challenge to the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Elections Practices's subpoenas.<ref>{{cite news|last=Long|first=Robert|title=Maine high court rejects appeal to shield names of donors to campaign against gay marriage|url=http://bangordailynews.com/2013/05/30/politics/maine-high-court-rejects-appeal-to-shield-names-of-donors-to-campaign-against-gay-marriage/|accessdate=May 30, 2013|newspaper=Bangnor Daily News |date=May 30, 2013}}</ref> | |||
In October 2013, NOM filed a federal lawsuit alleging that the IRS had intentionally leaked its 2008 tax return—including donor lists—in violation of federal law.<ref>Kim Barker, . ProPublica (December 14, 2012).</ref><ref name="RobillardLeak">Kevin Robillard, , ''Politico'' (July 19, 2013).</ref><ref name="McAfee">David McAfee, , ''Law360'' (October 8, 2013).</ref> The lawsuit arose from the March 2012 disclosure of NOM's 2008 IRS Form 990, Schedule B (which contained donor data) to an ] advocacy group and to the media.<ref name="McAfee"/> Under U.S. federal law, "the IRS is required to provide the public with certain tax information for 501(c)(4) organizations upon request—but personal identifying information of donors must be redacted by the agency."<ref name="Weinger">Mackenzie Weinger, , ''Politico'' (June 24, 2014).</ref> In a June 2014 ruling, Judge ] of the ] dismissed most of NOM's claims. While the IRS acknowledged that it had improperly made an unredacted copy of NOM's tax information public, the court found that NOM provided "no evidence that the information was willfully disclosed or the result of gross negligence."<ref name="Weinger"/><ref name="AdvocateIRS">{{cite news|last=Ring |first=Trudy |url=http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2014/06/05/court-nom-cant-claim-punitive-damages-irs-disclosure-suit |title=Court: NOM Can't Claim Punitive Damages in IRS Disclosure Suit |publisher=Advocate.com |date=2014-06-05 |access-date=2014-06-24}}</ref> In June 2014, the IRS agreed to settle NOM's remaining claims of improper disclosure of confidential tax information by paying $50,000 to NOM.<ref name="Weinger"/><ref>{{cite news|author=Jonathan H. Adler |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/06/24/irs-agrees-to-pay-non-profit-group-50000-for-unauthorized-release-of-tax-return/ |title=IRS agrees to pay non-profit group $50,000 for unauthorized release of tax return |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=2014-06-24}}</ref> | |||
In Iowa, the organization faces accusations from the ] of Iowa Action Fund and ] that it has failed to properly disclose its contributors.<ref name="baywindows.com"/> NOM's efforts in that state included spending $86,060 on the failed state House of Representatives campaign of Stephen Burgmeier.<ref>{{cite web|last=Bolcer |first=Julie |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/09/02/NOM-Backed_Candidate_Loses_in_Iowa/ |title=NOM-Backed Candidate Loses in Iowa |publisher=Advocate.com |accessdate=March 8, 2010}}</ref> | |||
===Transgender students=== | |||
NOM executive director Brown has stated that the group does not release donor names to prevent donor intimidation by proponents of same-sex marriage.<ref name=washblade>{{cite news | url=http://www.washblade.com/print-b.cfm?blog_id=26819 | title=Anti-gay group to fight marriage efforts in D.C.: National Organization for Marriage relocates to city, seeks to block DOMA repeal | last=Chibbaro Jr. | first=Lou | date=August 21, 2009 | work=] | publisher=washblade.com | accessdate=August 22, 2009 }} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> The group used that argument in an unsuccessful lawsuit seeking to exempt them from California's disclosure laws, losing with each hearing so far.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/10/20/state/n173839D29.DTL&type=newsbayarea |title=Prop. 8 backers lose CA campaign disclosure case |work=San Francisco Chronicle |date=October 20, 2011 |accessdate=October 24, 2011 |deadurl=yes}}{{dead link|date=November 2011}}</ref><ref>http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2012/02/first-circuit-ruling-stands-supreme-court-rejects-nom-appeal.html</ref> | |||
On September 20, 2013, NOM announced that they would gather signatures aimed at putting a proposition on the November 2014 California ballot to repeal a law addressing the rights of transgender students.<ref name="bathrooms"/> The law, AB 1266, allows students to play on school sports teams and to use school bathrooms that accord with their gender identity. Brown said that "Opening our most vulnerable areas at school including showers, bathrooms and changing rooms to members of the opposite sex is politically-correct madness that risks the privacy and security of our children and grandchildren."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/2013/09/23/national_organization_for_marriage_takes_aim_at_californias_transgender_students_rights_law/singleton/ |title=National Organization for Marriage takes aim at California's transgender students' rights law |work=Salon.com |date=2013-09-23 |access-date=2013-11-02}}</ref> On February 24, 2014, the California secretary of state's office reported that the proposition had failed to gather enough valid signatures to qualify for the November election.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Mason|first1=Melanie|title=Measure to block transgender student law fails to make ballot|url=https://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/24/local/la-me-pc-transgender-student-initiative-20140224|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140328152433/http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/24/local/la-me-pc-transgender-student-initiative-20140224|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 28, 2014|access-date=June 11, 2014|agency=Los Angeles Times|date=February 24, 2014}}</ref> | |||
===International activities=== | |||
NOM president Brown has spoken in Russia against ].<ref name=":0" /> He spoke to ], telling them that persecution of religious people would arise from permitting equal rights in any form.<ref name=":0">{{cite news|last=Grindley |first=Lucas |url=http://www.advocate.com/parenting/2013/10/04/national-organization-marriage-caught-helping-russia-pass-antigay-laws |title=National Organization for Marriage Caught Helping Russia Pass Antigay Laws |publisher=Advocate.com |date=2013-10-04 |access-date=2013-11-02}}</ref> | |||
===Free Speech Bus=== | |||
Along with Spain-based advocacy group ] and the ]<ref>{{cite web|last1=Eversley|first1=Melanie|title=Bus with anti-transgender message is vandalized in NYC|website=]|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/23/bus-anti-transgender-message-vandalized-nyc/99560530/|access-date=28 May 2018}}</ref> NOM activists toured in the "Free Speech Bus", an orange bus displaying the anti-transgender slogan "It's Biology: Boys are boys... and always will be. Girls are Girls... and always will be. You can't change sex. Respect all." This campaign, aimed to oppose the concept of ] people, mainly covered the ]. At one stop in Boston, people tried to block the bus, and at another stop, it was vandalized.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/03/31/an-anti-transgender-free-speech-bus-is-rolling-through-the-east-coast-sparking-protests-and-a-video-game/|title=An anti-transgender 'Free Speech Bus' is rolling through the East Coast, sparking protests — and a video game|newspaper=Washington Post}}</ref> | |||
==IRS filings== | |||
In 2009, ] (CAH) filed a formal complaint with the IRS against NOM, saying that NOM had refused to make its IRS 990 forms public, as required by law. CAH representatives went to "the Princeton, New Jersey, offices of the National Organization for Marriage twice to get copies of their IRS 990 reports, to no avail," said CAH's president, ]. "Then our representative, Ben Katzenberg, sent two certified letters to the NOM office on March 18, 2009, requesting its two 990 forms. Federal law requires NOM to furnish copies of these IRS filings within 30 days after the request has been received. And 40 days later, still no 990s."<ref>{{cite news |title=Antigay Group Hiding Mormon Cash? |first=Neal |last=Broverman |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/05/04/Antigay_Group_Hiding_Mormon_Cash_/ |newspaper=] |date=May 4, 2009 |access-date=April 19, 2011 }}{{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> NOM has since posted 990 forms for 2007 and 2008 on their website.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nationformarriage.org/financial-reports/ |title=Financial Reports |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |access-date=April 19, 2023}}</ref> | |||
==Campaign finance issues== | |||
In March 2009, Fred Karger filed a complaint with the ] alleging that the National Organization for Marriage was established by ] in order to direct church funds toward the passage of Proposition 8.<ref>{{cite news |title=Prop. 8 foes accuse Mormons of establishing front group |first=Brian |last=Joseph |url=http://totalbuzz.ocregister.com/2009/03/19/prop-8-foes-accuse-mormons-of-establishing-front-group/14727/ |newspaper=] |date=March 19, 2009 |access-date=April 22, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110701181956/http://totalbuzz.ocregister.com/2009/03/19/prop-8-foes-accuse-mormons-of-establishing-front-group/14727/ |archive-date=July 1, 2011 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}<br/>{{cite news |title=Antigay Group Hiding Mormon Cash? |first=Neal |last=Broverman |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/05/04/Antigay_Group_Hiding_Mormon_Cash_/ |newspaper=] |date=May 4, 2009 |access-date=April 22, 2011 }}{{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> A church spokesman and NOM's then-president Maggie Gallagher both denied the allegations.<ref>{{cite news | |||
|url=http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11952191 | |||
|title=Leaked memos: Gay rights group make new charges over LDS Prop 8 role | |||
|newspaper=Salt Lake Tribune | |||
|access-date=April 22, 2011 | |||
|last=Tony | |||
|first=Semerad | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090403043207/http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11952191 | |||
|archive-date=April 3, 2009 | |||
|url-status=dead | |||
|df=mdy-all | |||
}}</ref> | |||
In 2009, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices voted, 3–2, to investigate NOM for campaign finance violations; the Commission overrode the recommendation of their staff.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://bangordailynews.com/2009/10/22/politics/antigay-marriage-group-sues-state/|title=Anti-gay marriage group sues state|date=October 22, 2009 }}</ref> Maine law required organizations soliciting more than $5,000 for ballot question campaigns to file disclosure reports.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite news |url=http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/126297.html |title=Anti-gay marriage group sues state |newspaper=Bangor Daily News |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106114740/http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/126297.html |archive-date=January 6, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> NOM had contributed $1.6 million to ] without filing any disclosure reports.<ref name="Bangor Daily News"/> NOM filed suit, claiming that the state's election laws violate the ].<ref name="Bangor Daily News"/> NOM, arguing that their lawsuit was likely to succeed, sought a federal restraining order to avoid having to provide donor names before the date of the balloting, which U.S. District Court Judge ] denied.<ref name=nyt20091030> ''The New York Times'', October 29, 2009</ref> In February 2011, Hornby issued a summary judgment ruling that Maine's disclosure law was valid, a decision NOM appealed and lost in August 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mpbn.net/News/MaineNewsArchive/tabid/181/ctl/ViewItem/mid/3475/ItemId/17580/Default.aspx |title=Court Sides with Maine in Election Law Dispute |publisher=Mpbn.net |date=November 8, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref> NOM's efforts to appeal in the federal courts failed when the Supreme Court declined to hear one appeal in February 2012<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/27/44206.htm |title=Courthouse News Service |publisher=Courthousenews.com |date=January 31, 2012 |access-date=February 28, 2012}}</ref> and another in October 2012.<ref>{{cite news|last=Long|first=Robert|title=U.S. Supreme Court rejects anti-gay marriage group's appeal of Maine's donor disclosure law|url=http://bangordailynews.com/2012/10/01/politics/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-anti-gay-marriage-groups-appeal-of-maines-donor-disclosure-law/|access-date=October 1, 2012 |newspaper=Bangor News|date=October 1, 2012}}</ref> In 2014, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices fined NOM over $50,000 and demanded that the group file a campaign finance report; the report was required to include the identities of donors who supported NOM's efforts in connection with the 2009 Maine referendum.<ref name="foxmaine">{{cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/national-organization-for-marriage-sued-by-maine-over-2009-referendum/ |title=National Organization for Marriage sued by Maine over 2009 referendum |agency=Associated Press |date=2014-05-28 |access-date=2014-06-01}}</ref> NOM filed a complaint against two groups that support gay marriage: The ] and the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force Foundation, saying that they had engaged in the same actions as NOM.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pressherald.com/2014/06/11/national-organization-for-marriage-targets-gay-marriage-advocates-with-complaints-to-ethics-panel/|title=National Organization for Marriage targets gay-marriage advocates with ethics complaints |publisher=The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram |access-date=2014-06-24}}</ref> On August 24, 2015, the ''Sun Journal'' reported that NOM had paid the State of Maine a fine of over $50,000, that it had disclosed the names of its donors, and that NOM had stated that it would not continue to contest the matter in court.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sunjournal.com/2015/08/24/national-organization-marriage-files-2009-donors-list/|title=National Organization for Marriage files 2009 donors list|first1=Christopher|last1=Cousins|first2=Bangor Daily|last2=News|date=August 24, 2015}}</ref> | |||
In Iowa, NOM was investigated by the Iowa Ethics & Campaign Disclosure Board over whether it failed to properly disclose the names of donors towards its campaign to unseat judges who had ruled in favor of same-sex marriage in the state.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2013/08/08/iowa-ethics-board-will-investigate-national-organization-for-marriage/article |title=Iowa ethics board will investigate national organization for marriage|access-date=2013-11-02}}</ref> Previously, it had faced accusations from the ] of Iowa Action Fund and ] that it has failed to properly disclose its contributors.<ref name="baywindows.com"/> NOM's efforts in that state included spending $86,060 on the failed state House of Representatives campaign of Stephen Burgmeier.<ref>{{cite web |last=Bolcer |first=Julie |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/09/02/NOM-Backed_Candidate_Loses_in_Iowa/ |title=NOM-Backed Candidate Loses in Iowa |publisher=Advocate.com |access-date=March 8, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120723170921/http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/09/02/NOM-Backed_Candidate_Loses_in_Iowa/ |archive-date=July 23, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
NOM executive director Brown has stated that the group keeps the identities of its donors private to prevent donor intimidation by proponents of same-sex marriage.<ref name=washblade>{{cite news|url=http://www.washblade.com/print-b.cfm?blog_id=26819 |title=Anti-gay group to fight marriage efforts in D.C.: National Organization for Marriage relocates to city, seeks to block DOMA repeal |last=Chibbaro Jr. |first=Lou |date=August 21, 2009 |work=] |publisher=washblade.com |access-date=August 22, 2009 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> The group used that argument in an unsuccessful lawsuit seeking to exempt them from California's disclosure laws.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/10/20/state/n173839D29.DTL&type=newsbayarea |title=Prop. 8 backers lose CA campaign disclosure case |work=San Francisco Chronicle |date=October 20, 2011 |access-date=October 24, 2011 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Hagan |first=Robyn |url=https://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2012/02/first-circuit-ruling-stands-supreme-court-rejects-nom-appeal.html |title=First Circuit Ruling Stands: Supreme Court Rejects NOM Appeal - Court News - U.S. First Circuit |publisher=Blogs.findlaw.com |date=2012-02-29 |access-date=2013-11-02}}</ref> | |||
==Criticism and opposition== | ==Criticism and opposition== | ||
==="NOM Exposed"=== | ==="NOM Exposed"=== | ||
In September 2010, the ] (HRC) and the ] launched "NOM Exposed", a website which says it documents "Truth, Lies, and Connections about the So-Called National Organization for Marriage."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nomexposed.org/ |title=NOM Exposed |publisher=] and ] | |
In September 2010, the ] (HRC) and the ] launched "NOM Exposed", a website which says it documents "Truth, Lies, and Connections about the So-Called National Organization for Marriage."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nomexposed.org/ |title=NOM Exposed |publisher=] and ] |access-date=October 1, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101001095625/http://nomexposed.org/ |archive-date=October 1, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref name="newsweekNOMExposed">{{cite news |title=A New Kind of Outing |first=Eve |last=Conant |newspaper=] |date=September 28, 2010 |url=http://www.newsweek.com/2010/09/28/web-site-documents-nom-supporters.html |access-date=October 1, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=NOM Exposed by HRC, Courage Campaign |first=Julie |last=Bolcer |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/09/28/HRC_Courage_Campaign_Expose_NOM/ |newspaper=] |date=September 28, 2010 |access-date=April 19, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101004021548/http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/09/28/HRC_Courage_Campaign_Expose_NOM/ |archive-date=October 4, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> The site contained profiles of NOM leaders and prominent supporters; details of NOM's links to ], the Catholic Church and conservative Christian organizations such as ], the Knights of Columbus and ]; information about NOM's budget; and an interactive map with information on NOM activities in specific states.<ref name="newsweekNOMExposed" /><ref>{{cite news |title=HRC To Watchdog National Organization for Marriage |first=Jesse |last=Zwick |newspaper=] |date=September 28, 2010 |url=http://washingtonindependent.com/98899/hrc-to-watchdog-national-organization-for-marriage |access-date=October 1, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101003003835/http://washingtonindependent.com/98899/hrc-to-watchdog-national-organization-for-marriage |archive-date=October 3, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> HRC spokesperson Michael Cole characterized NOM as "a secretive player in antigay politics, which is posing as an offshore company for antigay religious money"; NOM president Brown countered that NOM is "not out to hoodwink voters... talking openly about same-sex marriage" and predicted that the "NOM Exposed" website would backfire.<ref name="newsweekNOMExposed" /> Brown also said that HRC's "heavy-handed attacks on NOM only prove that we are the key national organization fighting for marriage as one man and one woman."<ref>{{cite press release |title=National Organization for Marriage responds to NOMexposed.com |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |date=September 29, 2010 |url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=8735529¬oc=1 |access-date=October 1, 2010 }}</ref> | ||
===Southern Poverty Law Center=== | ===Southern Poverty Law Center=== | ||
The ] included NOM on its Winter 2010 list of "anti-gay <!-- NOTE: DO NOT ADD THE WORD "HATE" HERE. SPLC HAS SPECIFICALLY NOTED THAT THEY WERE NOT LISTING NOM AS A "HATE GROUP" SEE THIS ARTICLE'S DISCUSSION PAGE FOR DETAILS. -->groups" that "have continued to pump out demonizing propaganda aimed at homosexuals."<ref name=SPLC>{{cite web |
The ] included NOM on its Winter 2010 list of "anti-gay <!-- NOTE: DO NOT ADD THE WORD "HATE" HERE. SPLC HAS SPECIFICALLY NOTED THAT THEY WERE NOT LISTING NOM AS A "HATE GROUP" SEE THIS ARTICLE'S DISCUSSION PAGE FOR DETAILS. -->groups" that "have continued to pump out demonizing propaganda aimed at homosexuals."<ref name=SPLC>{{cite web|url=http://splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/winter/the-hard-liners |title=18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda |publisher=Southern Poverty Law Center |access-date=November 22, 2010 |last=Schlatter |first=Evelyn |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101129185413/http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/winter/the-hard-liners |archive-date=November 29, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> NOM president Brown took issue with the inclusion, stating that NOM "isn't about being anti-anyone."<ref>{{cite news|last=Thompson|first=Krissah|title='Hate Group' Designation Angers Same-Sex Marriage Opponents|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/24/AR2010112405573.html|access-date=November 25, 2010|newspaper=Washington Post|date=November 24, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Schlatter |first=Evelyn |url=http://splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/winter/the-hard-liners |title=18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda | Southern Poverty Law Center |publisher=Splcenter.org |access-date=June 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101129185413/http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/winter/the-hard-liners |archive-date=November 29, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
===Resignation of Louis Marinelli=== | ===Resignation of Louis Marinelli=== | ||
On April 8, 2011, Louis Marinelli, a 25-year-old NOM activist and online strategist who describes himself as "the one behind the 2010 Summer for Marriage Tour", had driven the bus during that tour, and had moderated many of NOM's web properties (including its Facebook page, its Twitter account, and the Tour blog), resigned from his affiliation with the organization, announced his support for same-sex marriage, and categorically apologized for and repudiated his past actions on behalf of the organization.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://louisjmarinelli.com/politics/i-now-support-full-marriage-equality |title=I now support full marriage equality |author=Marinelli, Louis |date=April 8, 2011 |work=Two Cents and a Couple of Copecks | |
On April 8, 2011, Louis Marinelli, a 25-year-old NOM activist and online strategist who describes himself as "the one behind the 2010 Summer for Marriage Tour", had driven the bus during that tour, and had moderated many of NOM's web properties (including its Facebook page, its Twitter account, and the Tour blog), resigned from his affiliation with the organization, announced his support for same-sex marriage, and categorically apologized for and repudiated his past actions on behalf of the organization.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://louisjmarinelli.com/politics/i-now-support-full-marriage-equality |title=I now support full marriage equality |author=Marinelli, Louis |date=April 8, 2011 |work=Two Cents and a Couple of Copecks |access-date=April 10, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110410034214/http://louisjmarinelli.com/politics/i-now-support-full-marriage-equality |archive-date=April 10, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=National Organization for Marriage Strategist Realizes He's Actually Pro-Gay Marriage |author=Vilensky, Mike |url=https://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/04/gay_marriage.html?imw=Y&f=most-viewed-24h5 |newspaper=] |date=April 9, 2011 |access-date=April 9, 2011 }}<br>{{cite news |title=The line is open |author=Brantley, Max |url=http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2011/04/08/the-line-is-open |newspaper=] |date=April 8, 2011 |access-date=April 9, 2011 }}<br>{{cite news |title=Ex-NOM organizer embraces same-sex marriage |first=Ben |last=Smith |author-link=Ben Smith (journalist) |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0411/ExNOM_organizer_embraces_samesex_marriage.html?showall |newspaper=] |date=April 11, 2011 |access-date=April 13, 2011 }}<br>{{cite news |title=Remember National Org. for Marriage's Summer for Marriage Tour? |first=Susan |last=Campbell |url=http://blogs.courant.com/susan_campbell/2011/04/remember-national-org-for-marr.html |newspaper=] |date=April 11, 2011 |access-date=April 13, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120712125155/http://blogs.courant.com/susan_campbell/2011/04/remember-national-org-for-marr.html |archive-date=July 12, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}<br>{{cite news |title=Anti-Gay Activist Actually Loves Gay Marriage |first=Joe |last=Coscarelli |url=http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/04/anti-gay_activist_louis_marinelli.php |newspaper=] |date=April 11, 2011 |access-date=April 13, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110414113527/http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/04/anti-gay_activist_louis_marinelli.php |archive-date=April 14, 2011 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}<br>{{cite news |title=Gay Marriage Supporters Seek the Aide of a Former Opponent |first=Elspeth |last=Reeve |url=http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/04/gay-marriage-supporters-seek-capitalize-cultural-warrior-who-switched-sides/36555/ |newspaper=] |publisher=] |date=April 11, 2011 |access-date=April 14, 2011 }}<br>{{cite news |title=Homophobic Activist Converts, Admits Same-Sex Civil Marriage Should Be a Universal Right |first=Melissa |last=Meinzer |url=http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2011/04/homophobic_activist_converts.php |newspaper=] |date=April 12, 2011 |access-date=April 13, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020132025/http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2011/04/homophobic_activist_converts.php |archive-date=October 20, 2014 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref name="dailybeast-marinelli">{{cite news |title=An Anti-Gay Marriage Crusader on His Conversion |first=Eve |last=Conant |url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-13/anti-gay-marriage-crusader-louis-marinelli-on-his-conversion/ |newspaper=] |date=April 13, 2011 |access-date=April 15, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110417092710/http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-13/anti-gay-marriage-crusader-louis-marinelli-on-his-conversion/ |archive-date=April 17, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref> He also shut down the Facebook page he had built up for NOM, which had 290,000 followers.<ref name="today-fb">{{cite news |title=Anti-gay Facebook page hacked by its own administrator |first=Helen A.S. |last=Popkin |url=http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2011/04/13/6465506-anti-gay-facebook-page-hacked-by-its-own-administrator |newspaper=] |publisher=] |date=April 13, 2011 |access-date=April 14, 2011}}</ref> The next day, NOM created a new official Facebook page (to replace Marinelli's), and released this statement: "Louis Marinelli worked in a volunteer capacity as a bus driver during our summer marriage tour. Around this time, NOM began to pay him as a part-time consultant for helping us expand our internet reach. He has since chosen a different focus. We wish him well."<ref name="today-fb"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://nomblog.com/7220/ |title=NOM Announces New Facebook Page! |author=NOM staff |date=April 9, 2011 |publisher=National Organization for Marriage |access-date=April 10, 2011}}</ref> NOM president Brown publicly downplayed Marinelli's role with the organization,<ref name="dailybeast-marinelli" /> however, after Marinelli published several articles critical of NOM on his website, Brown contacted him and said that if the articles were not removed, NOM would pursue legal action against Marinelli for violation of a ] he had signed as a contractor with access to specialized information.<ref>{{cite news |title=Anti-Gay Marriage Group NOM Threatens To Sue Defector |first=Ryan J. |last=Reilly |url=http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/anti-gay_marriage_group_nom_threatens_to_sue_defec.php |newspaper=] |date=April 19, 2011 |access-date=April 19, 2011}}</ref> | ||
===Photo manipulation=== | ===Photo manipulation=== | ||
<!-- Deleted image removed: ].]] --> | <!-- Deleted image removed: ].]] --> | ||
In October 2011, the blog ''Good As You'' showed that NOM used uncredited photographs of 2008 rallies for then-presidential candidate ] on its website to make it appear that the crowds supporting Obama were actually NOM supporters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2011/10/photo-a-mutant-strain-of-nom-misrepresentation.html#jsid-1319555228-979 |title=Photo: A mutant strain of NOM misrepresentation |publisher=Goodasyou.org |date=October 24, 2011 | |
In October 2011, the blog ''Good As You'' showed that NOM used uncredited photographs of 2008 rallies for then-presidential candidate ] on its website to make it appear that the crowds supporting Obama were actually NOM supporters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2011/10/photo-a-mutant-strain-of-nom-misrepresentation.html#jsid-1319555228-979 |title=Photo: A mutant strain of NOM misrepresentation |publisher=Goodasyou.org |date=October 24, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2011/10/photo-a-mutant-strain-of-nom-misrepresentation-part-2.html |title=Photo: A mutant strain of NOM misrepresentation (part 2) |publisher=Goodasyou.org |date=October 25, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref> | ||
The story was subsequently picked up by media including '']'' and ''Instinct Magazine''. Brown dismissed the photo controversy as a misdirection effort by "Rachel Maddow and her friends on the left". NOM removed the photos in the collage, referring to one of them as "a common use photo in the public domain".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nomblog.com/15222/ |title=The Great NOM Photo "Controversy" |publisher=Nomblog.com |date=November 1, 2011 | |
The story was subsequently picked up by media including '']'' and ''Instinct Magazine''. Brown dismissed the photo controversy as a misdirection effort by "Rachel Maddow and her friends on the left". NOM removed the photos in the collage, referring to one of them as "a common use photo in the public domain".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nomblog.com/15222/ |title=The Great NOM Photo "Controversy" |publisher=Nomblog.com |date=November 1, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref> The images included one ] photo and two that were copyrighted under a ] license requiring that the photographer be credited.<ref>{{cite web|last=Grindley |first=Lucas |url=http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/11/01/NOM_Tries_and_Fails_to_Explain_Why_It_Manipulated_Photos/ |title=NOM Tries (and Fails) to Explain Why It Manipulated Photos |publisher=Advocate.com |date=November 1, 2011 |access-date=December 4, 2011}}</ref> | ||
===Wedge tactics=== | ===Wedge tactics=== | ||
In March 2012, NOM memos dated to 2009 advocating strategies of pitting the African-American and homosexual communities against each other, of discouraging Latino assimilation into a culture accepting of same-sex marriage, and of painting President Obama as a "social radical" were released by a federal judge in Maine and published by the Human Rights Campaign.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/27/MNA51NQTAH.DTL&type=politics |title=Prop. 8 group pitted blacks, Latinos against gays |last=Lochhead |first=Caroline |newspaper=San |
In March 2012, NOM memos dated to 2009 advocating strategies of pitting the African-American and homosexual communities against each other, of discouraging Latino assimilation into a culture accepting of same-sex marriage, and of painting President Obama as a "social radical" were released by a federal judge in Maine and published by the Human Rights Campaign.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/27/MNA51NQTAH.DTL&type=politics |title=Prop. 8 group pitted blacks, Latinos against gays |last=Lochhead |first=Caroline |newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle |date=March 28, 2012 |access-date=March 28, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/27/politics/marriage-group-memos/index.html |title=Group sought wedge between blacks, gays to fight same-sex marriage |author=<!--Not stated--> |work=CNN |date=March 28, 2012 |access-date=March 28, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/breaking-previously-confidential-documents-shed-light-on-nom-strategy/ |title=Breaking: Previously Confidential Documents Shed Light on NOM Strategy |work=Human Rights Campaign |last=Nix |first=Kevin |date=March 26, 2012 |access-date=March 28, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120329012457/http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/breaking-previously-confidential-documents-shed-light-on-nom-strategy |archive-date=March 29, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> The internal NOM documents state that they seek "to drive a wedge between gays and blacks" by promoting "African American spokespeople for marriage", thus provoking same-sex marriage supporters into "denouncing these spokesmen and women as bigots", and to interrupt the assimilation of Latinos into "dominant Anglo culture" by making the stance against same-sex marriage "a key badge of Latino identity". The documents also showed a goal to "sideswipe" US President Barack Obama by depicting him as a "social radical" via issues including child protection and pornography.<ref name="ibtimes">{{cite news |url=http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/320313/20120327/national-organization-marriage-exposed-wedge-black-gay.htm |title=National Organization For Marriage Memos Reveal Plan to Drive 'Wedge' Between Black, Gay Communities |last=Portero |first=Ashley |newspaper=International Business Times |date=March 27, 2012 |access-date=March 28, 2012}}</ref><ref name="DailyNewswedge">{{cite news |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/gay-marriage-foes-sought-split-gays-blacks-article-1.1051913 |title=Gay-Marriage Foes Sought to Split Gays and Blacks |newspaper=New York Daily News |last=Crary |first=David |agency=Associated Press |date=March 27, 2012 |access-date=March 28, 2012}}</ref> | ||
The revealed tactics were described as "one of the most cynical things |
The revealed tactics were described as "one of the most cynical things I've ever heard"<ref name="sfgate1">{{cite news|last=Marinucci |first=Carla |url=http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/03/30/did-romney-pac-violate-california-law-by-failing-to-report-10000-donation-to-pro-prop-8-effort/?tsp=1 |title=Did Romney PAC violate California law by failing to report $10,000 donation to pro-Prop. 8 effort? |work=San Francisco Chronicle |date=March 30, 2012 |access-date=March 31, 2012}}</ref> and "scary"<ref name="msnbcstrat" /> by ], chairman emeritus of the ].<ref name="sfgate1"/> The ] said that the "documents expose N.O.M. for what it really is – a hate group determined to use African American faith leaders as pawns to push their damaging agenda."<ref name="msnbcstrat">{{cite news|url=http://video.msnbc.msn.com/msnbc-tv/46905649/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120401225140/http://video.msnbc.msn.com/msnbc-tv/46905649 |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 1, 2012 |title=NOM Strategy to divide gays and blacks? |publisher=MSNBC |access-date=March 31, 2012}}</ref> | ||
In response to the controversy, NOM stated that the organization has a diverse base of support which includes people of "every color, creed and background" and that it has "worked with prominent African-American and Hispanic leaders, including Dr. Alveda C. King, Bishop George McKinney of the COGIC Church, Bishop Harry Jackson and the New York State Senator Reverend Rubén Díaz Sr."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=11675511¬oc=1 |date=March 27, 2012 |title=NOM Proud of Strong Record on Minority Partnerships |publisher=National Organization for Marriage}}</ref> Gallagher, who was president of the organization at the time of the documents, said that their language "makes us sound way too big for our britches",<ref name="msnbcstrat" /> while Brown, president at the time the controversy arose, wrote that the language was "inapt", stating that "it would be enormously arrogant for anyone at NOM to believe that we can make or provoke African-American or Latino leaders do anything".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://instinctmagazine.com/blogs/blog/nom-defends-itself-against-race-baiting-by-race-baiting?directory=100011 |title=NOM Defends Itself Against Race Baiting ... By Race Baiting? |publisher=Instinct |date=March 31, 2012 | |
In response to the controversy, NOM stated that the organization has a diverse base of support which includes people of "every color, creed and background" and that it has "worked with prominent African-American and Hispanic leaders, including Dr. Alveda C. King, Bishop George McKinney of the COGIC Church, Bishop Harry Jackson and the New York State Senator Reverend Rubén Díaz Sr."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075187&ct=11675511¬oc=1 |date=March 27, 2012 |title=NOM Proud of Strong Record on Minority Partnerships |publisher=National Organization for Marriage}}</ref> Gallagher, who was president of the organization at the time of the documents, said that their language "makes us sound way too big for our britches",<ref name="msnbcstrat" /> while Brown, president at the time the controversy arose, wrote that the language was "inapt", stating that "it would be enormously arrogant for anyone at NOM to believe that we can make or provoke African-American or Latino leaders do anything".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://instinctmagazine.com/blogs/blog/nom-defends-itself-against-race-baiting-by-race-baiting?directory=100011 |title=NOM Defends Itself Against Race Baiting ... By Race Baiting? |publisher=Instinct |date=March 31, 2012 |access-date=March 31, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105065606/http://instinctmagazine.com/blogs/blog/nom-defends-itself-against-race-baiting-by-race-baiting?directory=100011 |archive-date=November 5, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | ||
==See also== | |||
{{clear}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==Notes== | |||
#{{note label|antigay myths|see|see}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|30em}} | {{reflist|30em}} | ||
===Notes=== | |||
#{{note label|antigay myths|see|see}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{portal|Conservatism}} | |||
{{Commons}}{{wikinews|National Organization for Marriage}} | |||
* {{official website|https://www.nationformarriage.org/}} | |||
* – a critical website sponsored by the ] and the ] | |||
* – a critical website sponsored by the ] and the ] | |||
* in a May 2009 interactive debate from NOW on PBS Online | |||
* in a May 2009 interactive debate from NOW on PBS Online | |||
{{American social conservatism}} | {{American social conservatism}} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:National Organization For Marriage}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:National Organization For Marriage}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 23:26, 21 November 2024
American non-profit political organization
Formation | 2007 |
---|---|
Type | NPO |
Headquarters | Princeton, New Jersey, United States |
President | Brian S. Brown |
Website | nationformarriage.org |
The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is an American non-profit political organization established to work against the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. It was formed in 2007 specifically to pass California Proposition 8, a state prohibition of same-sex marriage. The group has opposed civil union legislation and gay adoption, and has fought against allowing transgender individuals to use bathrooms that accord with their gender identity. Brian S. Brown has served as the group's president since 2010.
Leadership
NOM's founding board of directors consisted of:
- Maggie Gallagher, president
- Brian S. Brown, executive director (former executive director of Family Institute of Connecticut)
- Robert P. George, chairman of the board
- Neil Corkery, treasurer
- Chuck Stetson (chairman of the board, Bible Literacy Project)
- Ken Von Kohorn (chairman of the board, Family Institute of Connecticut)
- Luis Tellez (president, Witherspoon Institute Board of Trustees)
- Matthew S. Holland (president, Utah Valley University)
In April 2009, Holland was replaced on the board by Orson Scott Card (science fiction novelist and faculty member, Southern Virginia University), who then resigned in July 2013 after calling the battle against legalization of same-sex marriage in the US "moot" following a Supreme Court decision. In September 2011, law professor John C. Eastman replaced Gallagher as the chairman of the board.
As of 2021, Brown remains the president and Eastman chairman of the board. As of 2011, law professor Robert P. George was chairman emeritus. As of 2011, Gallagher was still a board member and worked on specific projects for the group.
Nonprofit status and funding
Groups and projects
The group operates two nonprofit arms: a 501(c)(4) political advocacy group called National Organization for Marriage Inc., established in January 2008, and a 501(c)(3) called NOM Education Fund established in July 2008. The latter arm is not entitled to influence legislation or political campaigns. The Firefighters' Defense Fund, which existed to fund a successful sexual harassment lawsuit by firemen who claim they were forced to participate in a gay pride parade, was a NOM Education Fund project.
The group also operates state-based political action committees such as National Organization for Marriage PAC New York founded in June 2009, and National Organization for Marriage California PAC founded in February 2009. The state PACs receive funding from the main 501(c)(4) NOM arm.
Funding
NOM claims it has a wide base of grassroots support, however the majority of its funding comes from a very few anonymous sources making large donations. In NOM's IRS filing for 2009, three donations of $2.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million made up 68% of NOM's contributions and grants income of a little over $7.1 million, and just five donations made up 75%.
In 2010, Jesse Zwick, then a reporter for the Washington Independent, said he uncovered a 2009 donation to NOM—$1.43 million from the Knights of Columbus—that reporter Luke Johnson later said was apparently not reported to the IRS by NOM.
In 2010, two donors provided $6 million, two-thirds of the total donations for the year.
On its 2012 tax return, NOM reported a roughly $2 million deficit. Three donors contributed nearly two-thirds of the organization's $9.3 million in donations.
Mormon connection
Gay rights activist Fred Karger said in 2010 that NOM is connected to LDS Church, with large private donations coming from Mormon sources. Gallagher responded by denying any connection "except that a Mormon serves on NOM's board." Former board member Matthew S. Holland is a Mormon as is his replacement Orson Scott Card, and Catholic board member Robert P. George has served since August 2010 as an editorial advisor to the Deseret News, a newspaper owned by the LDS Church.
Activity
NOM has been involved in ballot measures, legislative elections, judicial elections, and issue advertising in various states. NOM was involved in the successful Proposition 8 campaign in California in 2008, as well as a similar successful campaign in Maine one year later. They were also involved in unsuccessful efforts to pass an amendment eliminating same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2007. NOM participated in efforts to block same-sex marriage in New Jersey, and has unsuccessfully attempted to block same-sex marriage legalization in New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia. On June 16, 2009, NOM announced the formation of NOM PAC New York, a political action committee with a goal of providing $500,000 to fund primary challenges against any Republican New York state senator who votes for gay marriage. NOM stated that they were "also looking to aid Democratic candidates who want to buck the establishment on the marriage issue, and to help in general election contests." In 2010, NOM was involved in successful efforts to oust three Iowa Supreme Court judges who had concurred in a decision that effectively legalized same-sex marriage there.
In 2009, Peter Montgomery of the progressive organization People for the American Way stated: "You have to take seriously They've raised a tremendous amount of money that they're funneling into various states."
2007 Massachusetts constitutional amendment
One of the group's first public acts was to campaign in support of a proposed 2007 Massachusetts constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage by restricting marriage to "the union of one man and one woman", in response to the Massachusetts court decision that legalized same-sex marriage in that state. The NOM-supported amendment failed to pass. The campaign included a billboard comparing representative Angelo Puppolo to Judas Iscariot and Benedict Arnold after he changed his position to oppose the amendment.
California Proposition 8
NOM was first formed to support the passage of California Proposition 8 in 2008, which amended the state Constitution to discontinue same-sex marriage ceremonies. The amendment defined marriage as the union between one man and one woman. NOM contributed $1.8 million to the Proposition 8 effort, and has been described as being "instrumental" in the success of the initiative. Proposition 8 was passed by voters 52% to 48%, and involved an estimated $83M by both sides of the issue. The amendment was in force until United States district court Judge Vaughn R. Walker overturned it in August 2010, in the case Perry v. Schwarzenegger, ruling that it violated both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the United States Constitution. NOM chairman Maggie Gallagher expressed her disagreement with the ruling, targeting Walker's sexuality and accusing him of "substituting his views for those of the American people and of our Founding Fathers." NOM President, Brian Snow, also expressed dissatisfaction with the ruling, stating "With a stroke of his pen, Judge Walker has overruled the votes and values of 7 million Californians" Walker did however place a temporary injunction on same-sex marriages to allow the defendants to bring their case before the United States Supreme Court. On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled the defendants in the case lacked standing to appeal earlier rulings in Federal Court. As a consequence, Walker's opinion striking down the law as unconstitutional stands as the final decision in the case. NOM addressed the Supreme Court's ruling on its website, asking the nation "show its displeasure" with the ruling, adding that "the Supreme Court ripped the legs out from under the institution of marriage."
Stand for Marriage Maine
In 2009, NOM was the primary contributor to Stand For Marriage Maine, the organization that led the successful campaign for Question 1 in Maine, a voter referendum that repealed the law passed by the legislature to allow same-sex marriages in the state. Voters passed the referendum 53%–47% out of 567,057 votes cast. Out of the initial $343,000 in contributions, NOM provided some $160,000.
NOM contributed over $1.6 million to Stand For Marriage Maine; by reports as of October 2009, NOM had contributed 63% of that group's funding.
NOM has brought a number of lawsuits to prevent being required to release the names of its donors funding Stand For Marriage Maine. In 2015, NOM released a campaign disclosure report after a state supreme court ruling on its release.
Advertising campaigns
On April 8, 2009, NOM began a "2 Million for Marriage" (2M4M) initiative with the intention of organizing two million activists nationwide. When NOM used the abbreviation "2M4M" for their "2 Million for Marriage" campaign, the media noted that in personal ads, "2M4M" is code for two men seeking a third male sexual partner. NOM did not secure the domain name and other net resources that use the "2M4M" term. Christopher Ambler, a consultant in rapid web development who characterizes himself as a "happily married straight guy", purchased the domain "2M4M.org" and branded it as "Two Men For Marriage," running material counter to NOM's 2M4M aims.
Gathering Storm
Main article: Gathering Storm (advertisement)The 2M4M campaign used an advertisement, "Gathering Storm", in which actors, primarily Mormons from Arizona, standing against a dramatic storm-cloud background, voiced opposition to same-sex marriage.
The Human Rights Campaign, a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) lobbying group and political action committee, described the ad saying that, in it, "actors make disproven claims about marriage for lesbian and gay couples."
New York Times columnist Frank Rich described the "Gathering Storm" advertisement as "an Internet camp classic", and it was parodied by Stephen Colbert, the website Funny or Die, and in the Futurama episode "Proposition Infinity".
Other advertisements
On April 30, 2009, NOM and beauty pageant winner Carrie Prejean launched another ad campaign against gay marriage, called "No Offense". In the ad, they object to being characterized as "outright bigots" because of their stance. After semi-nude photos of Prejean were posted on the Internet, causing some to accuse NOM of hypocrisy, NOM issued a press release stating that Prejean had appeared with NOM as a private citizen and not as a spokesperson. In the wake of the revelation that Prejean had made masturbation videos, NOM removed reference to the video from the front page of their website.
On May 28, 2009, NOM rolled out an advertising campaign in New York, including a video spot. The Christian Science Monitor described the spot as listing a "litany of grievances" as an "ominous score" plays, with a potentially embarrassing error for a campaign based on education: misspelling marriage as marraige.
During the 2016 North Carolina gubernatorial election, NOM released an ad criticizing Democratic candidate Roy Cooper for his support for allowing transgender individuals access to bathrooms that reflect their gender identity. The ad claimed that doing so would give sexual predators easy access to children and other potential victims.
New York Congressional phone campaign
NOM spent over $112,000 on a get-out-the-vote phone campaign for Conservative Party of New York candidate Douglas Hoffman in the contentious 2009 House of Representatives campaign for New York's 23rd District. After pro-same-sex-marriage Republican candidate Dede Scozzafava withdrew from the race, Hoffman lost to Democrat Bill Owens, who also opposed gay marriage, by a 2.3% margin. State senators said that this congressional race affected the New York State Senate's December 2, 2009 vote against same-sex marriage legislation; all 30 Republican state senators voted "no". Following her unsuccessful campaign, Scozzafava acknowledged that her name had begun being used as a verb: "scozzafavaed". When the gay Republican organization GOProud had a booth at the 2010 Conservative Political Action Conference, Brown commented, "e have a message for GOProud on marriage: If you try to elect pro-gay-marriage Republicans, we will Dede Scozzafava them." In addition, Maggie Gallagher has used the phrase "the Dede effect" to describe Republican lawmakers' fear of alienating their constituents by voting for same-sex marriage legislation.
Summer for Marriage Tour
In 2010, NOM staged a 23-city tour holding rallies against same-sex marriage. The rallies attracted supporters and pro-gay marriage protesters. At many stops along the tour, NOM supporters were outnumbered by counter-protesters supporting same-sex marriage; in Atlanta, LGBT rights supporters outnumbered opponents of same-sex marriage by a ratio of ten to one. The tour ended with a rally at the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., while pro-gay marriage activists held a simultaneous event at the Freedom Plaza.
After Peter Yarrow and Paul Stookey, the surviving members of Peter, Paul and Mary, discovered that NOM had been using their recording of "This Land is Your Land" rallies in this tour, they sent a letter to Brown requesting that NOM cease using their recording, stating that NOM's philosophy was "directly contrary to the advocacy position" held by the group. Similarly, after John Mellencamp was informed that NOM had used his song "Pink Houses" at one of their events, his publicist wrote a letter (at his instruction) stating Mellencamp's support for same-sex marriage and asking that NOM stop using his music.
Campaign finance lawsuit
NOM filed a lawsuit in US district court, on free speech grounds, seeking the right to run ads in the Rhode Island governor's race without complying with that state's campaign finance laws, including both campaign financing contribution limits and reporting requirements. In October 2010 the suit was dismissed; the court called the filing "disorganized, vague and poorly constructed" and gave the group one week to refile the lawsuit. NOM appealed to federal court, who ruled against them.
Civil union opposition
NOM has opposed civil union recognition, calling it "a direct threat to marriage and the religious liberties" and stating that "civil union statutes across the country have been used to sue business owners and professionals who run their practices by their deeply held religious beliefs." It has campaigned against the passage of Illinois's Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, SB 1716.
Iowa judge retention vote campaign
On November 2, 2010, NOM ran a bus tour through Iowa campaigning for removal of three Iowa Supreme Court justices then up for a retention vote, following the court's unanimous decision in Varnum v. Brien; the retention vote was "the most controversial...and one of the closest" races on the ballot. All three justices lost the retention vote, the first time any judge had lost that vote since Iowa initiated the retention system in 1962.
New York same-sex marriage opposition
NOM actively opposed legalization of same-sex marriage in New York in 2011. The group sponsored a rally in the Bronx in May 2011 with state Senator Ruben Diaz, Sr., a Democrat. After same-sex marriage was legalized in the state by the legislature in June 2011, NOM pledged to spend $2 million to defeat the four Republicans who voted for the bill to legalize it, and erected signs in the districts of those senators, warning "You're Next". Wealthy same-sex marriage supporters vowed to finance the targeted senators.
NOM supported four "Let the People Vote" rallies later in July of the same year, with the stated purpose of having the voters decide the issue versus the bill passed by the state's legislature.
North Carolina Amendment 1
NOM provided more than $300,000 to the committee supporting North Carolina's Amendment 1, a 2012 referendum which would alter the state's constitution to forbid marriage and all other recognition for same-sex couples.
2012 presidential pledge
On August 3, 2011, NOM unveiled a pledge for 2012 Republican presidential candidates. Signers pledged that they would support a federal marriage amendment, appoint federal judges who are originalists and thus "reject the idea our Founding Fathers inserted a right to gay marriage in our Constitution", defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court, "establish a presidential commission on religious liberty to investigate and document reports of Americans who have been harassed or threatened for exercising key civil rights to organize, to speak, to donate or to vote for marriage", and "advance legalization to return to the people of the District of Columbia their right to vote on marriage." This pledge was signed by candidates Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, and Newt Gingrich (who initially declined), along with Tim Pawlenty; Ron Paul and Herman Cain chose not to sign. During the Iowa primary campaign, NOM aired a TV ad targeting Paul, contrasting his failure to pledge with the activities of "the major presidential candidates", thus implying that Paul was not truly in contention in the primary campaign.
Oregon intercession
NOM attempted repeatedly to intercede in the legalization of same-sex marriage in Oregon. The group requested to be allowed to act as defendants in the state court case that ultimately found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional, but were denied by the judge as lacking standing, a ruling that was confirmed by the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. After the ruling that started same-sex marriage in the state, NOM filed a request with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking that the state court's ruling be stayed, to allow NOM to further pursue its case for being an intercessor, and that the matter be reviewed by the Supreme Court. The request was denied.
March For Marriage
NOM organized protest marches against same-sex marriage in Washington, DC, in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017. The 2015 March For Marriage took place on April 25, the Saturday before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a set of cases related to same-sex marriage. About 100 people attended the 2016 event, including counterprotestors. About 50 attended in 2017.
IRS release of donor information
In October 2013, NOM filed a federal lawsuit alleging that the IRS had intentionally leaked its 2008 tax return—including donor lists—in violation of federal law. The lawsuit arose from the March 2012 disclosure of NOM's 2008 IRS Form 990, Schedule B (which contained donor data) to an LGBT rights advocacy group and to the media. Under U.S. federal law, "the IRS is required to provide the public with certain tax information for 501(c)(4) organizations upon request—but personal identifying information of donors must be redacted by the agency." In a June 2014 ruling, Judge James Cacheris of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed most of NOM's claims. While the IRS acknowledged that it had improperly made an unredacted copy of NOM's tax information public, the court found that NOM provided "no evidence that the information was willfully disclosed or the result of gross negligence." In June 2014, the IRS agreed to settle NOM's remaining claims of improper disclosure of confidential tax information by paying $50,000 to NOM.
Transgender students
On September 20, 2013, NOM announced that they would gather signatures aimed at putting a proposition on the November 2014 California ballot to repeal a law addressing the rights of transgender students. The law, AB 1266, allows students to play on school sports teams and to use school bathrooms that accord with their gender identity. Brown said that "Opening our most vulnerable areas at school including showers, bathrooms and changing rooms to members of the opposite sex is politically-correct madness that risks the privacy and security of our children and grandchildren." On February 24, 2014, the California secretary of state's office reported that the proposition had failed to gather enough valid signatures to qualify for the November election.
International activities
NOM president Brown has spoken in Russia against adoption by LGBT people. He spoke to Committee on International Affairs of the State Duma, telling them that persecution of religious people would arise from permitting equal rights in any form.
Free Speech Bus
Along with Spain-based advocacy group CitizenGo and the International Organization for the Family NOM activists toured in the "Free Speech Bus", an orange bus displaying the anti-transgender slogan "It's Biology: Boys are boys... and always will be. Girls are Girls... and always will be. You can't change sex. Respect all." This campaign, aimed to oppose the concept of transgender people, mainly covered the East Coast. At one stop in Boston, people tried to block the bus, and at another stop, it was vandalized.
IRS filings
In 2009, Californians Against Hate (CAH) filed a formal complaint with the IRS against NOM, saying that NOM had refused to make its IRS 990 forms public, as required by law. CAH representatives went to "the Princeton, New Jersey, offices of the National Organization for Marriage twice to get copies of their IRS 990 reports, to no avail," said CAH's president, Fred Karger. "Then our representative, Ben Katzenberg, sent two certified letters to the NOM office on March 18, 2009, requesting its two 990 forms. Federal law requires NOM to furnish copies of these IRS filings within 30 days after the request has been received. And 40 days later, still no 990s." NOM has since posted 990 forms for 2007 and 2008 on their website.
Campaign finance issues
In March 2009, Fred Karger filed a complaint with the California Fair Political Practices Commission alleging that the National Organization for Marriage was established by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in order to direct church funds toward the passage of Proposition 8. A church spokesman and NOM's then-president Maggie Gallagher both denied the allegations.
In 2009, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices voted, 3–2, to investigate NOM for campaign finance violations; the Commission overrode the recommendation of their staff. Maine law required organizations soliciting more than $5,000 for ballot question campaigns to file disclosure reports. NOM had contributed $1.6 million to Stand For Marriage Maine without filing any disclosure reports. NOM filed suit, claiming that the state's election laws violate the Constitution. NOM, arguing that their lawsuit was likely to succeed, sought a federal restraining order to avoid having to provide donor names before the date of the balloting, which U.S. District Court Judge David Brock Hornby denied. In February 2011, Hornby issued a summary judgment ruling that Maine's disclosure law was valid, a decision NOM appealed and lost in August 2011. NOM's efforts to appeal in the federal courts failed when the Supreme Court declined to hear one appeal in February 2012 and another in October 2012. In 2014, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices fined NOM over $50,000 and demanded that the group file a campaign finance report; the report was required to include the identities of donors who supported NOM's efforts in connection with the 2009 Maine referendum. NOM filed a complaint against two groups that support gay marriage: The Human Rights Campaign and the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force Foundation, saying that they had engaged in the same actions as NOM. On August 24, 2015, the Sun Journal reported that NOM had paid the State of Maine a fine of over $50,000, that it had disclosed the names of its donors, and that NOM had stated that it would not continue to contest the matter in court.
In Iowa, NOM was investigated by the Iowa Ethics & Campaign Disclosure Board over whether it failed to properly disclose the names of donors towards its campaign to unseat judges who had ruled in favor of same-sex marriage in the state. Previously, it had faced accusations from the Interfaith Alliance of Iowa Action Fund and One Iowa that it has failed to properly disclose its contributors. NOM's efforts in that state included spending $86,060 on the failed state House of Representatives campaign of Stephen Burgmeier.
NOM executive director Brown has stated that the group keeps the identities of its donors private to prevent donor intimidation by proponents of same-sex marriage. The group used that argument in an unsuccessful lawsuit seeking to exempt them from California's disclosure laws.
Criticism and opposition
"NOM Exposed"
In September 2010, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the Courage Campaign launched "NOM Exposed", a website which says it documents "Truth, Lies, and Connections about the So-Called National Organization for Marriage." The site contained profiles of NOM leaders and prominent supporters; details of NOM's links to Latter-Day Saints, the Catholic Church and conservative Christian organizations such as Opus Dei, the Knights of Columbus and Focus on the Family; information about NOM's budget; and an interactive map with information on NOM activities in specific states. HRC spokesperson Michael Cole characterized NOM as "a secretive player in antigay politics, which is posing as an offshore company for antigay religious money"; NOM president Brown countered that NOM is "not out to hoodwink voters... talking openly about same-sex marriage" and predicted that the "NOM Exposed" website would backfire. Brown also said that HRC's "heavy-handed attacks on NOM only prove that we are the key national organization fighting for marriage as one man and one woman."
Southern Poverty Law Center
The Southern Poverty Law Center included NOM on its Winter 2010 list of "anti-gay groups" that "have continued to pump out demonizing propaganda aimed at homosexuals." NOM president Brown took issue with the inclusion, stating that NOM "isn't about being anti-anyone."
Resignation of Louis Marinelli
On April 8, 2011, Louis Marinelli, a 25-year-old NOM activist and online strategist who describes himself as "the one behind the 2010 Summer for Marriage Tour", had driven the bus during that tour, and had moderated many of NOM's web properties (including its Facebook page, its Twitter account, and the Tour blog), resigned from his affiliation with the organization, announced his support for same-sex marriage, and categorically apologized for and repudiated his past actions on behalf of the organization. He also shut down the Facebook page he had built up for NOM, which had 290,000 followers. The next day, NOM created a new official Facebook page (to replace Marinelli's), and released this statement: "Louis Marinelli worked in a volunteer capacity as a bus driver during our summer marriage tour. Around this time, NOM began to pay him as a part-time consultant for helping us expand our internet reach. He has since chosen a different focus. We wish him well." NOM president Brown publicly downplayed Marinelli's role with the organization, however, after Marinelli published several articles critical of NOM on his website, Brown contacted him and said that if the articles were not removed, NOM would pursue legal action against Marinelli for violation of a confidentiality agreement he had signed as a contractor with access to specialized information.
Photo manipulation
In October 2011, the blog Good As You showed that NOM used uncredited photographs of 2008 rallies for then-presidential candidate Barack Obama on its website to make it appear that the crowds supporting Obama were actually NOM supporters.
The story was subsequently picked up by media including The Rachel Maddow Show and Instinct Magazine. Brown dismissed the photo controversy as a misdirection effort by "Rachel Maddow and her friends on the left". NOM removed the photos in the collage, referring to one of them as "a common use photo in the public domain". The images included one Reuters photo and two that were copyrighted under a Creative Commons license requiring that the photographer be credited.
Wedge tactics
In March 2012, NOM memos dated to 2009 advocating strategies of pitting the African-American and homosexual communities against each other, of discouraging Latino assimilation into a culture accepting of same-sex marriage, and of painting President Obama as a "social radical" were released by a federal judge in Maine and published by the Human Rights Campaign. The internal NOM documents state that they seek "to drive a wedge between gays and blacks" by promoting "African American spokespeople for marriage", thus provoking same-sex marriage supporters into "denouncing these spokesmen and women as bigots", and to interrupt the assimilation of Latinos into "dominant Anglo culture" by making the stance against same-sex marriage "a key badge of Latino identity". The documents also showed a goal to "sideswipe" US President Barack Obama by depicting him as a "social radical" via issues including child protection and pornography.
The revealed tactics were described as "one of the most cynical things I've ever heard" and "scary" by Julian Bond, chairman emeritus of the NAACP. The National Black Justice Coalition said that the "documents expose N.O.M. for what it really is – a hate group determined to use African American faith leaders as pawns to push their damaging agenda."
In response to the controversy, NOM stated that the organization has a diverse base of support which includes people of "every color, creed and background" and that it has "worked with prominent African-American and Hispanic leaders, including Dr. Alveda C. King, Bishop George McKinney of the COGIC Church, Bishop Harry Jackson and the New York State Senator Reverend Rubén Díaz Sr." Gallagher, who was president of the organization at the time of the documents, said that their language "makes us sound way too big for our britches", while Brown, president at the time the controversy arose, wrote that the language was "inapt", stating that "it would be enormously arrogant for anyone at NOM to believe that we can make or provoke African-American or Latino leaders do anything".
See also
Notes
References
- Newton, David E. (2010). Same-sex marriage: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 222. ISBN 978-1-59884-707-9.
- ^ Mencimer, Stephanie (July 1, 2010). "Gay Marriage Foes: 'Til Disclosure Do Us Part?". Mother Jones. Mother Jones and the Foundation for National Progress.
- "Rhode Island takes major step toward approving civil unions". Reuters. June 29, 2011.
- "RI House approves 'civil unions,' 62 to 11". The Providence Journal. May 19, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
- Brown, Brian (April 6, 2011). "Urgent Alert: Tell Gov. McDonnell to Oppose Same-Sex Adoption Regs". NOM Blog. National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- ^ Dolan, Maura (September 20, 2013). "Prop. 8 backers behind effort to repeal transgender law". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- "About NOM". National Organization for Marriage. Archived from the original on December 17, 2007. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- ^ "About NOM – National Organization for Marriage". National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved April 18, 2011.
- "Boards and Staff". Bible Literacy Project. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- "Our Staff, Board of Directors, and Advisory Council Members". Family Institute of Connecticut. Archived from the original on April 6, 2011. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- "Board of Trustees". Witherspoon Institute. Archived from the original on June 13, 2011. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- "UVU Employee Professional Pages". Utah Valley University. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- "National Organization for Marriage Welcomes Orson Scott Card to its Board of Directors". National Organization for Marriage. April 23, 2009. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- Josh Rottenberg, Entertainment Weekly, July 26, 2013
- ^ "NOM Announces New Chairman of the Board". National Organization for Marriage. September 22, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
- "Leadership". Nation for Marriage. National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved July 18, 2021.
- ^ Blanco, Chino (July 14, 2009). "Knock, Knock, Anybody NOM? Anybody Mormon?". Daily Kos. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
- ^ Jackson, Herb (November 29, 2011). "New Jersey grass roots campaigns don't reveal funding sources". Washington Independent.
- "Jury Says San Diego Firefighters Were Sexually Harassed in Gay Parade". Fox News. February 17, 2009.
- ^ Johnson, Luke (January 6, 2011). "Despite 'grassroots' claim, most of National Organization for Marriage funding comes from few sources". Washington Independent. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012.
- "Form 990 for Tax Year 2009" (PDF). National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved April 4, 2011.
- Zwick, Jesse (September 20, 2010). "In wake of ballot initiatives, questions about the National Organization for Marriage's funding". The American Independent. Washington DC. Archived from the original on January 2, 2013. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
- Resnick, Sofia (July 27, 2010). "National Organization for Marriage's 2010 financial records raise questions". The Washington Independent. Archived from the original on January 7, 2012. Retrieved December 15, 2011.
- Jim Hinch (July 7, 2014). "Evangelicals Are Changing Their Minds on Gay Marriage: And the Bible isn't getting in their way". Politico. Retrieved July 14, 2014.
- "Deseret News introduces Editorial Advisory Board". Deseret News. Salt Lake City. August 23, 2010.
- "Two Sides Spend Big in Battle Over Same-Sex Marriage in New Jersey". Fox News. December 10, 2009. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Swami, Prerana (June 17, 2009). "N.Y. Gay Marriage Bill Faces New Challenges". CBS News. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- "Marriage Victory in New York!". National Organization for Marriage. December 2, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- Sulzberger, A. G. (November 3, 2010). "Iowa Judges Defeated After Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage". The New York Times. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- ^ Hesse, Monica (August 28, 2009). "Opposing Gay Unions With Sanity & a Smile". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- Phillips, Frank (June 14, 2007). "Legislators vote to defeat same-sex marriage ban". The Boston Globe. Retrieved June 15, 2007.
- Ring, Dan. "Billboard attacks gay marriage vote". The Republican. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- "Campaign Finance: National Organization For Marriage California – Yes On 8". Secretary of State Debra Bowen. Retrieved April 22, 2011.
- Conant, Eve (November 15, 2010). "'I Do'? I Don't!". Newsweek. Retrieved April 22, 2011.
- "Tracking the money: Final Numbers". Los Angeles Times.
- "Ruling by United States District Court" (PDF). San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
- "California's Prop. 8 ban on same-sex marriage ruled unconstitutional". USA Today. August 4, 2010.
- "Supreme Court dismisses California's Proposition 8 appeal". CNN. June 27, 2013.
- "What You Can Do Today to Help Save Marriage". NOM Blog. June 28, 2013. Archived from the original on July 1, 2013. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- ^ Setback for Group Fighting Gay Marriage in Maine The New York Times, October 29, 2009
- Goodnough, Abby (November 17, 2009). "Loss in Maine Sets Back Gay-Marriage Drive". The New York Times. Maine. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- "Other National Races – Election Results 2009 – The New York Times". Elections.nytimes.com. November 9, 2009. Archived from the original on July 21, 2011. Retrieved June 27, 2011.
- ^ Keen, Lisa (September 4, 2009). "NOM Under Investigation". Bay Windows. Archived from the original on June 12, 2011. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Public Campaign Finance Page for the State of Maine". Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices. Archived from the original on January 11, 2013. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- ^ "Money fueling battle over gay marriage". Bangor Daily News. Archived from the original on July 19, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- Sharp, David (August 24, 2015). "Group turns over donor list from gay marriage fight in Maine". New York Daily News. Associated Press. Retrieved August 18, 2023.
- "NOM Launches Nationwide "Two Million for Marriage" Initiative!". Nationformarriage.org. April 8, 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- "de beste bron van informatie over 2 m 4 m. Deze website is te koop!". 2m4m.org. Archived from the original on April 14, 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- "Anti-Gay Rights Group Calls its Marriage Campaign '2M4M'". 2009.
- "National Organization For Marriage Or Two Men For Marriage?".
- "About 2M4M.org". April 9, 2009. Archived from the original on April 15, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2009.
- ^ Rich, Frank (April 19, 2009). "The Bigots' Last Hurrah". The New York Times. pp. WK10.
- Foust, Michael (April 17, 2009). "A winning strategy to stop 'gay marriage'?". Baptist Press. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2010.
- "Human Rights Campaign Exposes National Organization for Marriage's Fake Ad for Fake Problems" (Press release). Human Rights Campaign. April 8, 2009. Archived from the original on April 26, 2011. Retrieved April 18, 2011.
- Smith, Ben (April 8, 2009). "New campaign fights same-sex marriage". Politico. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
Terkel, Amanda (April 9, 2009). "HRC releases audition tapes of 'Gathering Storm' actors". Think Progress. Center for American Progress. Retrieved April 18, 2011.
Wolfson, Evan (April 13, 2009). "Winning the Freedom to Marry? Cue the Attack on the Gays!". Huffington Post. Retrieved April 19, 2011. - Young, John (April 21, 2009). "'Gathering Storm' spoofs: Which celebrity gay-marriage parody rains more laughs?". Entertainment Weekly. PopWatch blog. Archived from the original on April 25, 2009. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
- "National Organization for Marriage and Carrie Prejean Launch New Ad Showing Intolerance of Gay Marriage Activists, Illustrating Threats to Religious Liberty". National Organization for Marriage. April 30, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Miss California Carrie Prejean in semi-nude photo controversy". The Vancouver Sun. May 5, 2009. Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Statement on Carrie Prejean". National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Anti-Gay Marriage Group Distances Itself From Prejean". On Top Magazine. November 16, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Conservative activists turn to web for traction; denounce gay 'marriage'". The Christian Science Monitor. May 28, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "National Organization for Marriage releases anti-trans bathroom ad". NBC News.
- "NOM's expenditure report" (PDF). Tips-q.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 17, 2011. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- Provided photo. "GOP picks candidate for congressional seat, attacks likely Democratic hopeful". The Post-Standard. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Scozzafava Suspends Campaign". Watertown Daily Times. October 31, 2009. Archived from the original on November 2, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- Hoffman concedes 23rd Congressional race to Owens, Associated Press, November 4, 2009 Archived November 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
- Vielkind, Jimmy (August 11, 2009). "Meet Bill Owens, a DCCC-Approved Non-Democrat for the House". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on November 6, 2009. Retrieved December 11, 2009.
- "Special election results certified". Watertown Daily Times. December 16, 2009. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- Precious, Tom. "Gay marriage not likely to come to Senate again soon : Albany". The Buffalo News. Archived from the original on December 5, 2009. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- Hakim, Danny (November 6, 2009). "Marriage for Gays on Agenda in New York". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2010.
- "Advocates Say Despite GOP Flip, State Senate Could Pass Marriage Equality". NY1.com. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- Rachel Slajda (November 10, 2009). "Scozzafava: 'My Name's A Verb Now' | TPM LiveWire". Tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com. Archived from the original on March 5, 2011. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- Horowitz, Jason. 'My name's a verb now': Dede Scozzafava sadder, wiser after bruising political race Archived March 22, 2012, at the Wayback Machine Watertown Daily Times.
- Tuma, Mary. "GOProud Director: National Organization for Marriage Are 'Pansies,' 'Wusses'". The Washington Independent. Archived from the original on November 11, 2011. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- Vick, Karl (December 3, 2009). "N.Y. State Senate votes down gay marriage bill by wide margin". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 1, 2010.
- "Baptist Press – N.Y., N.J., groups race to pass 'gay marriage' by year's end – News with a Christian Perspective". Bpnews.net. November 12, 2009. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- "Same-Sex-Marriage Fight Hits The Road". NPR. NPR. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- ^ "Opposing Groups Hold Rallies On Marriage Views". WISC-TV. Madison, Wisconsin. July 27, 2010. Archived from the original on August 31, 2010. Retrieved August 18, 2010.
"Hundreds march to protest National Organization for Marriage rally". WisPolitics.com. July 28, 2010. Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved August 18, 2010.
Hancock, Jason (July 28, 2010). "National Organization for Marriage trying to raise money in Iowa". The Iowa Independent. Archived from the original on January 26, 2013. Retrieved August 18, 2010.
Chapman, Steve (July 29, 2010). "Entangling marriage into a political jujitsu". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on August 1, 2010. Retrieved August 18, 2010.
Burress, Jim; Aleck Ragsdale (August 8, 2010). "National Organization for Marriage, NOM, Rallies Under Gold Dome". WABE. Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved August 18, 2010.
Ehlers, Matt (August 11, 2010). "Gay marriage critics roll in". The News & Observer. Raleigh, North Carolina. Archived from the original on October 3, 2012. Retrieved August 18, 2010. - Key, Michael (August 16, 2010). "D.C. sees National Organization for Marriage rally, counter protest". Washingtonblade.com. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- Garcia, Michelle (August 31, 2010). "Peter, Paul, & Mary's Warning to NOM". The Advocate. Archived from the original on September 5, 2010. Retrieved April 10, 2011.
- "John Mellencamp Doesn't Like NOM". The Advocate. October 9, 2010. Archived from the original on October 11, 2010. Retrieved April 10, 2011.
- "Anti-gay marriage group ordered to refile RI suit". Boston Globe. Associated Press. October 1, 2010. Archived from the original on October 10, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
- Gregg, Katherine (September 28, 2010). "Opponents of same-sex marriage file suit to allow unlimited campaign spending in Rhode Island". Providence Journal. Archived from the original on October 1, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
- "Lower court ruling on campaign disclosures is upheld". The Providence Journal. August 11, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
- "National Organization for Marriage". www.nationformarriage.org.
- SDGLN staff (November 23, 2010). "Anti-gay NOM expands target, opposes civil unions". San Diego Gay and Lesbian News. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- "Voting out the justices: What Iowans are saying". The Des Moines Register. November 3, 2010. Archived from the original on July 30, 2012. Retrieved January 14, 2011.
- Schulte, Grant (November 3, 2010). "Iowans dismiss three justices". The Des Moines Register. Archived from the original on July 30, 2012. Retrieved January 14, 2011.
- Eckholm, Erik; Seelye, Katharine Q. (July 2, 2011). "New York's Approval of Same-Sex Marriage Spurs Opponents for New Fights". The New York Times.
- Kaplan, Thomas (October 12, 2011). "4 Republicans Who Voted for Gay Marriage Set to Receive Aid". The New York Times.
- "Topic Galleries". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on November 27, 2022.
- ^ "Perry Signed Pledge" (PDF).
- "Romney, Bachmann, Santorum sign marriage pledge". USA Today. August 4, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- "NOM Pledge" (PDF). Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- Smith, Ben (August 4, 2011). "Romney signs marriage pledge". Politico. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- "Gingrich Signs NOM's Marriage Pledge, Leaving Only Paul Among Major Candidates Not To Have Signed". NOM Blog. December 15, 2011. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
- "Pawlenty signs NOM marriage pledge". Iowa Independent. Archived from the original on December 15, 2011. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
- "Gay Marriage Has Boosted Iowa's Economy, Study Concludes". USA: ABC. December 8, 2011. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
- Holley, Joe (August 26, 2011). "Perry signs pledge backing gay marriage ban – Houston Chronicle". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
- Peters, Jeremy W. (December 28, 2011). "Commercial Introduces Gay Marriage as an Issue in the Iowa Caucuses". The New York Times.
- Wong, Peter. "Appeals court: Foes of same-sex marriage can't intervene". Portland Tribune.
- "Group asks Supreme Court to block Oregon's same-sex marriage ruling". Portland Tribune. May 27, 2014. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
- "Justices won't stop gay marriages in Oregon". USA Today. May 29, 2014. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
- "National Organization for Marriage (NOM) Rally on the National Mall | C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org.
- "Twitter, HRC Mock 'Crowd' at NOM's March for Marriage". www.advocate.com. June 19, 2014.
- ^ "Thousands on Mall voice support of state laws against same-sex marriage". Washington Post.
- "March for Marriage to protest Obergefell decision : News Headlines". www.catholicculture.org.
- ^ "March For Marriage Draws Tens, But Promises Ultimate Victory Over Obergefell". Right Wing Watch. June 17, 2017.
- "Protesters hold rally against gay marriage in DC". WUSA.
- Kim Barker, Karl Rove's Dark Money Group Promised IRS It Would Spend 'Limited' Money on Elections. ProPublica (December 14, 2012).
- Kevin Robillard, National Organization for Marriage to sue IRS, Politico (July 19, 2013).
- ^ David McAfee, Marriage Group Sues IRS Over Leaked Tax Return, Law360 (October 8, 2013).
- ^ Mackenzie Weinger, IRS pays $50K in confidentiality suit, Politico (June 24, 2014).
- Ring, Trudy (June 5, 2014). "Court: NOM Can't Claim Punitive Damages in IRS Disclosure Suit". Advocate.com. Retrieved June 24, 2014.
- Jonathan H. Adler. "IRS agrees to pay non-profit group $50,000 for unauthorized release of tax return". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 24, 2014.
- "National Organization for Marriage takes aim at California's transgender students' rights law". Salon.com. September 23, 2013. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Mason, Melanie (February 24, 2014). "Measure to block transgender student law fails to make ballot". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 28, 2014. Retrieved June 11, 2014.
- ^ Grindley, Lucas (October 4, 2013). "National Organization for Marriage Caught Helping Russia Pass Antigay Laws". Advocate.com. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Eversley, Melanie. "Bus with anti-transgender message is vandalized in NYC". USA Today. Retrieved May 28, 2018.
- "An anti-transgender 'Free Speech Bus' is rolling through the East Coast, sparking protests — and a video game". Washington Post.
- Broverman, Neal (May 4, 2009). "Antigay Group Hiding Mormon Cash?". The Advocate. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- "Financial Reports". National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
- Joseph, Brian (March 19, 2009). "Prop. 8 foes accuse Mormons of establishing front group". Orange County Register. Archived from the original on July 1, 2011. Retrieved April 22, 2011.
Broverman, Neal (May 4, 2009). "Antigay Group Hiding Mormon Cash?". The Advocate. Retrieved April 22, 2011. - Tony, Semerad. "Leaked memos: Gay rights group make new charges over LDS Prop 8 role". Salt Lake Tribune. Archived from the original on April 3, 2009. Retrieved April 22, 2011.
- "Anti-gay marriage group sues state". October 22, 2009.
- "Anti-gay marriage group sues state". Bangor Daily News. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- "Court Sides with Maine in Election Law Dispute". Mpbn.net. November 8, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- "Courthouse News Service". Courthousenews.com. January 31, 2012. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
- Long, Robert (October 1, 2012). "U.S. Supreme Court rejects anti-gay marriage group's appeal of Maine's donor disclosure law". Bangor News. Retrieved October 1, 2012.
- "National Organization for Marriage sued by Maine over 2009 referendum". Associated Press. May 28, 2014. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
- "National Organization for Marriage targets gay-marriage advocates with ethics complaints". The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram. Retrieved June 24, 2014.
- Cousins, Christopher; News, Bangor Daily (August 24, 2015). "National Organization for Marriage files 2009 donors list".
{{cite web}}
:|last2=
has generic name (help) - "Iowa ethics board will investigate national organization for marriage". Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Bolcer, Julie. "NOM-Backed Candidate Loses in Iowa". Advocate.com. Archived from the original on July 23, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- Chibbaro Jr., Lou (August 21, 2009). "Anti-gay group to fight marriage efforts in D.C.: National Organization for Marriage relocates to city, seeks to block DOMA repeal". Washington Blade. washblade.com. Retrieved August 22, 2009.
- "Prop. 8 backers lose CA campaign disclosure case". San Francisco Chronicle. October 20, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
- Hagan, Robyn (February 29, 2012). "First Circuit Ruling Stands: Supreme Court Rejects NOM Appeal - Court News - U.S. First Circuit". Blogs.findlaw.com. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- "NOM Exposed". Human Rights Campaign and Courage Campaign. Archived from the original on October 1, 2010. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
- ^ Conant, Eve (September 28, 2010). "A New Kind of Outing". Newsweek. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
- Bolcer, Julie (September 28, 2010). "NOM Exposed by HRC, Courage Campaign". The Advocate. Archived from the original on October 4, 2010. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- Zwick, Jesse (September 28, 2010). "HRC To Watchdog National Organization for Marriage". Washington Independent. Archived from the original on October 3, 2010. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
- "National Organization for Marriage responds to NOMexposed.com" (Press release). National Organization for Marriage. September 29, 2010. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
- Schlatter, Evelyn. "18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda". Southern Poverty Law Center. Archived from the original on November 29, 2010. Retrieved November 22, 2010.
- Thompson, Krissah (November 24, 2010). "'Hate Group' Designation Angers Same-Sex Marriage Opponents". Washington Post. Retrieved November 25, 2010.
- Schlatter, Evelyn. "18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda | Southern Poverty Law Center". Splcenter.org. Archived from the original on November 29, 2010. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- Marinelli, Louis (April 8, 2011). "I now support full marriage equality". Two Cents and a Couple of Copecks. Archived from the original on April 10, 2011. Retrieved April 10, 2011.
- Vilensky, Mike (April 9, 2011). "National Organization for Marriage Strategist Realizes He's Actually Pro-Gay Marriage". New York. Retrieved April 9, 2011.
Brantley, Max (April 8, 2011). "The line is open". Arkansas Times. Retrieved April 9, 2011.
Smith, Ben (April 11, 2011). "Ex-NOM organizer embraces same-sex marriage". Politico. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
Campbell, Susan (April 11, 2011). "Remember National Org. for Marriage's Summer for Marriage Tour?". Hartford Courant. Archived from the original on July 12, 2012. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
Coscarelli, Joe (April 11, 2011). "Anti-Gay Activist Actually Loves Gay Marriage". The Village Voice. Archived from the original on April 14, 2011. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
Reeve, Elspeth (April 11, 2011). "Gay Marriage Supporters Seek the Aide of a Former Opponent". The Atlantic Wire. The Atlantic. Retrieved April 14, 2011.
Meinzer, Melissa (April 12, 2011). "Homophobic Activist Converts, Admits Same-Sex Civil Marriage Should Be a Universal Right". Riverfront Times. Archived from the original on October 20, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2011. - ^ Conant, Eve (April 13, 2011). "An Anti-Gay Marriage Crusader on His Conversion". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on April 17, 2011. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
- ^ Popkin, Helen A.S. (April 13, 2011). "Anti-gay Facebook page hacked by its own administrator". Today. NBC. Retrieved April 14, 2011.
- NOM staff (April 9, 2011). "NOM Announces New Facebook Page!". National Organization for Marriage. Retrieved April 10, 2011.
- Reilly, Ryan J. (April 19, 2011). "Anti-Gay Marriage Group NOM Threatens To Sue Defector". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- "Photo: A mutant strain of NOM misrepresentation". Goodasyou.org. October 24, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- "Photo: A mutant strain of NOM misrepresentation (part 2)". Goodasyou.org. October 25, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- "The Great NOM Photo "Controversy"". Nomblog.com. November 1, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- Grindley, Lucas (November 1, 2011). "NOM Tries (and Fails) to Explain Why It Manipulated Photos". Advocate.com. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- Lochhead, Caroline (March 28, 2012). "Prop. 8 group pitted blacks, Latinos against gays". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- "Group sought wedge between blacks, gays to fight same-sex marriage". CNN. March 28, 2012. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- Nix, Kevin (March 26, 2012). "Breaking: Previously Confidential Documents Shed Light on NOM Strategy". Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on March 29, 2012. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- Portero, Ashley (March 27, 2012). "National Organization For Marriage Memos Reveal Plan to Drive 'Wedge' Between Black, Gay Communities". International Business Times. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- Crary, David (March 27, 2012). "Gay-Marriage Foes Sought to Split Gays and Blacks". New York Daily News. Associated Press. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
- ^ Marinucci, Carla (March 30, 2012). "Did Romney PAC violate California law by failing to report $10,000 donation to pro-Prop. 8 effort?". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved March 31, 2012.
- ^ "NOM Strategy to divide gays and blacks?". MSNBC. Archived from the original on April 1, 2012. Retrieved March 31, 2012.
- "NOM Proud of Strong Record on Minority Partnerships". National Organization for Marriage. March 27, 2012.
- "NOM Defends Itself Against Race Baiting ... By Race Baiting?". Instinct. March 31, 2012. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved March 31, 2012.
External links
- Official website
- NOM Exposed – a critical website sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign and the Courage Campaign
- Maggie Gallagher debates Gavin Newsom on gay marriage in a May 2009 interactive debate from NOW on PBS Online
- National Organization for Marriage
- Political organizations based in the United States
- Non-profit organizations based in Princeton, New Jersey
- Non-profit organizations based in Washington, D.C.
- Organizations established in 2007
- 2007 establishments in the United States
- Same-sex marriage in the United States
- Lobbying organizations in the United States
- 2008 California Proposition 8
- Conservative organizations in the United States