Misplaced Pages

Roche limit: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:58, 2 September 2004 editNoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,677 editsm Revert vandalism← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:56, 26 December 2024 edit undoDes Vallee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,207 editsm Determination: hyperlink 
(611 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Orbital radius at which a satellite might break up due to gravitational force}}
{| width=300 align="right" style="margin-left:15px;"
{{About|the orbit within which particles might form rings or objects on a stable orbit might disintegrate into rings|the limits at which an orbiting object will be captured|Roche lobe|the gravitational sphere of influence of one astronomical body in the face of perturbations from another heavier body around which it orbits|Roche sphere}}
|-
{{Multiple image
|]
| align = right
|-
| direction = vertical
| Consider a mass of orbiting fluid held together by gravity. Far from the Roche limit, the mass is practically spherical.
| width = 300
| image1 = Roche limit (far away sphere).svg
| caption1 = A celestial body (yellow) is orbited by a mass of fluid (blue) held together by gravity, here viewed from above the orbital plane. Far from the Roche limit (white line), the mass is practically spherical.
| image2 = Roche limit (tidal sphere).svg
| caption2 = Closer to the Roche limit, the body is deformed by ]s.
| image3 = Roche limit (ripped sphere).svg
| caption3 = Within the Roche limit, the mass's own gravity can no longer withstand the tidal forces, and the body disintegrates.
| image4 = Roche limit (top view).svg
| caption4 = Particles closer to the primary move more quickly than particles farther away, as represented by the red arrows.
| image5 = Roche limit (ring).svg
| caption5 = The varying orbital speed of the material eventually causes it to form a ring.
| total_width =
| alt1 =
}}


In ], the '''Roche limit''', also called '''Roche radius''', is the distance from a celestial body within which a second celestial body, held together only by its own force of ], will disintegrate because the first body's tidal forces exceed the second body's ].<ref name="wolf">{{Cite web |author=Weisstein |first=Eric W. |date=2007 |title=Eric Weisstein's World of Physics&nbsp;– Roche Limit |url=http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/RocheLimit.html |access-date=September 5, 2007 |publisher=scienceworld.wolfram.com}}</ref> Inside the Roche limit, ] material disperses and forms ], whereas outside the limit, material tends to ]. The Roche radius depends on the radius of the first body and on the ratio of the bodies' densities.
|-
|]
|-
| Closer to the Roche limit, the body deformed by ]s.
|-
|]
|-
| Within the Roche limit, the mass' own gravity can no longer withstand the tidal forces, and the body disintegrates.
|}
The '''Roche limit''' is the distance within which a ]&mdash;]ing a ] (typically a ], ] or ]) and held together only by its own ]&mdash;will start to disintegrate due to ]s exceeding the satellite's gravitational self-attraction. The term is named after ], the ] ] who first discovered this theoretical limit in ].


The term is named after ] ({{IPA|fr|ʁɔʃ|lang}}, {{IPAc-en|lang|r|ɒ|ʃ}} {{respell|ROSH}}), the ] ] who first calculated this theoretical limit in 1848.<ref name="two">{{Cite web |url=http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/faq/FAQSaturn/#q11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423160619/http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/faq/FAQSaturn/#q11 |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 23, 2009 |title=What is the Roche limit? |access-date=September 5, 2007 |publisher=NASA&nbsp;– JPL |author=NASA}}</ref>
The Roche limit should not be confused with the concept of the ] which is also named after Édouard Roche and which describes the limits at which an object which is in orbit around two other objects will be captured by one or the other.


== Explanation ==
Some real satellites, both ] and ], can orbit within their Roche limits because they are held together by forces other than gravitation (primarily the ]s of their materials). ]'s moons ] and ] are examples of natural bodies which are able to hold together despite being within their (non-rigid) Roche limits. However, an object resting on the surface of such a body can be pulled away by tidal forces, depending on where it is: tidal forces are repulsive along the axis to the central mass and attractive along the "equator" perpendicular to this: see ]. A weaker body, such as a ], could be broken up when it passes within its Roche limit. Comet ] passed within its Roche limit of Jupiter in July ] and fragmented into a number of smaller pieces before it finally crashed into the planet in ] after one last go around the Sun.
] was disintegrated by the tidal forces of ] into a string of smaller bodies in 1992, before colliding with the planet in 1994.]]
The Roche limit typically applies to a ]'s disintegrating due to ]s induced by its ''primary'', the body around which it ]s. Parts of the satellite that are closer to the primary are attracted more strongly by gravity from the primary than parts that are farther away; this disparity effectively pulls the near and far parts of the satellite apart from each other, and if the disparity (combined with any centrifugal effects due to the object's spin) is larger than the force of gravity holding the satellite together, it can pull the satellite apart. Some real satellites, both ] and ], can orbit within their Roche limits because they are held together by forces other than gravitation. Objects resting on the surface of such a satellite would be lifted away by tidal forces. A weaker satellite, such as a ], could be broken up when it passes within its Roche limit.


Since tidal forces overwhelm gravity within the Roche limit, no large body can coalesce out of smaller particles within that limit. And, indeed, all known ]s are located within their Roche limit. They could therefore either be remnants from the planet's proto-planetary ] that failed to coalesce into moonlets, or conversely have formed when a moon passed within its Roche limit and broke apart. Since, within the Roche limit, tidal forces overwhelm the gravitational forces that might otherwise hold the satellite together, no satellite can gravitationally coalesce out of smaller particles within that limit. Indeed, almost all known ]s are located within their Roche limit. (Notable exceptions are Saturn's ] and ]. These two rings could possibly be remnants from the planet's proto-planetary ] that failed to coalesce into moonlets, or conversely have formed when a moon passed within its Roche limit and broke apart.)


The gravitational effect occurring below the Roche limit is not the only factor that causes comets to break apart. Splitting by ], internal ], and rotational splitting are other ways for a comet to split under stress.
==Determining the Roche Limit==


== Determination ==
The roche limit depends on the rigidity of the satellite orbiting the planet. On one extreme, a force acting upon a rigid spherical body does not deform the body at all. In this case, the Roche Limit is
The limiting distance to which a ] can approach without breaking up depends on the rigidity of the satellite. At one extreme, a completely rigid satellite will maintain its shape until tidal forces break it apart. At the other extreme, a highly fluid satellite gradually deforms leading to increased tidal forces, causing the satellite to elongate, further compounding the tidal forces and causing it to break apart more readily.


Most real satellites would lie somewhere between these two extremes, with tensile strength rendering the satellite neither perfectly rigid nor perfectly fluid. For example, a ] will behave more like a fluid than a solid rocky one; an icy body will behave quite rigidly at first but become more fluid as tidal heating accumulates and its ices begin to melt.
:<math> d = R\left( 2\;\frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \approx 1.260R\left( \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>


But note that, as defined above, the Roche limit refers to a body held together solely by the gravitational forces which cause otherwise unconnected particles to coalesce, thus forming the body in question. The Roche limit is also usually calculated for the case of a circular orbit, although it is straightforward to modify the calculation to apply to the case (for example) of a body passing the primary on a parabolic or hyperbolic trajectory.
Where <math>R</math> is the primary's ], <math>\rho_M</math> is the primary's ] and <math>\rho_m</math> is the satellite's density. The other extreme is a satellite that deforms with very small or no resistance, like a liquid. The exact calculation is complex and cannot be solved exactly. A close approximation would be the following formula:


=== Rigid satellites ===
:<math> d \approx 2.423R\left( \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>
The ''rigid-body'' Roche limit is a simplified calculation for a ] satellite. Irregular shapes such as those of tidal deformation on the body or the primary it orbits are neglected. It is assumed to be in ]. These assumptions, although unrealistic, greatly simplify calculations.


The Roche limit for a rigid spherical satellite is the distance, <math>d</math>, from the primary at which the gravitational force on a test mass at the surface of the object is exactly equal to the tidal force pulling the mass away from the object:<ref>see calculation in Frank H. Shu, ''The Physical Universe: an Introduction to Astronomy,'' p. 431, University Science Books (1982), {{ISBN|0-935702-05-9}}.</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.asterism.org/tutorials/tut25-1.htm | title=Roche Limit: Why Do Comets Break Up? | access-date=2012-08-28 | archive-date=2013-05-15 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515200347/http://www.asterism.org/tutorials/tut25-1.htm | url-status=dead }}</ref>
Most real world satellites are somewhere between these two extremes, with internal ] reducing deformation and gravity increasing it.


:<math> d = R_M\left(2 \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>
===Rigid Bodies===


where <math>R_M</math> is the ] of the primary, <math>\rho_M</math> is the ] of the primary, and <math>\rho_m</math> is the density of the satellite. This can be equivalently written as
The formula for calculating the Roche limit, <math>d</math>, for a rigid ] satellite orbiting a spherical planet is:


:<math> d = R\left( 2\;\frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math> :<math> d = R_m\left(2 \frac {M_M} {M_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>


Where <math>R</math> is the ] of the ], <math>\rho_M</math> is the ] of the planet, and <math>\rho_m</math> is the density of the ]. This formula does not take into account the deformation of the moon's spherical shape due to tidal effects and is only an approximation of what a real moon's Roche limit would be. where <math>R_m</math> is the radius of the secondary, <math>M_M</math> is the ] of the primary, and <math>M_m</math> is the mass of the secondary. A third equivalent form uses only one property for each of the two bodies, the mass of the primary and the density of the secondary, is


:<math> d = 0.7816 \left( \frac {M_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>
Notice that if the moon is more than twice as dense as the planet (as can easily be the case for a rocky moon orbiting a gas giant) then the Roche limit will be inside the planet and hence not relevant.


These all represent the orbital distance inside of which loose material (e.g. ]) on the surface of the satellite closest to the primary would be pulled away, and likewise material on the side opposite the primary will also go away from, rather than toward, the satellite.
<center>]</center>


=== Fluid satellites ===
In order to determine the Roche limit, we consider a small mass <math>u</math> on the surface of the smaller planet closest to the larger planet. There are two forces on this mass <math>u</math>: the gravitational pull towards the smaller planet and the gravitational pull towards the larger planet. Since the smaller planet is already in orbital ] around the larger planet, the ] is the only relevant term of the gravitational attraction of the larger planet.
A more accurate approach for calculating the Roche limit takes the deformation of the satellite into account. An extreme example would be a ] liquid satellite orbiting a planet, where any force acting upon the satellite would deform it into a prolate ].


The calculation is complex and its result cannot be represented in an exact algebraic formula. Roche himself derived the following approximate solution for the Roche limit:
The gravitational pull <math>F_G</math> on the mass <math>u</math> towards the smaller planet with mass <math>m</math> and radius <math>r</math> can be expressed according to ].


:<math> F_G = \frac{Gmu}{r^2}</math> :<math> d \approx 2.44R\left( \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{1/3} </math>


However, a better approximation that takes into account the primary's oblateness and the satellite's mass is:
The ] <math>F_T</math> on the mass <math>u</math> towards the larger planet with radius <math>R</math> and a distance <math>d</math> between the center of the two planets can be expressed as:


:<math> d \approx 2.423 R\left( \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{1/3} \left( \frac{(1+\frac{m}{3M})+\frac{c}{3R}(1+\frac{m}{M})}{1-c/R} \right)^{1/3} </math>
:<math> F_T = \frac{2GMur}{d^3}</math>

The Roche limit is reached when the gravitational pull and the tidal force cancel each other out.

:<math> F_G = F_T </math>

or

:<math> \frac{Gmu}{r^2} = \frac{2GMur}{d^3}</math>

Which quickly gives the Roche limit, d, as:

:<math> d = r \left( 2 M / m \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>

However, we don't really want the radius of the smaller body to appear in the expression for the limit, so we re-write this in terms of densities.

For a sphere the mass <math>M</math> can be written as:

:<math> M = \frac{4\pi\rho_M R^3}{3}</math> where <math>R</math> is the radius of the larger planet.

And likewise:

:<math> m = \frac{4\pi\rho_m r^3}{3}</math> where <math>r</math> is the radius of the smaller planet.

Substiting for the masses in the equation for the Roche limit, and cancelling out <math>4\pi/3</math> gives:

:<math> d = r \left( 2 \rho_M R^3 / \rho_m r^3 \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>

which can be simplified to the Roche limit:

:<math> d = R\left( 2\;\frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>

===Non-rigid Bodies===
A more correct approach for calculating the Roche Limit takes the deformation of the satellite into account. An extreme example would be a ] liquid satellite orbiting a planet, where any force acting upon the satellite would deform the satellite. In this case, the satellite is deformed into a ] ].

The exact calculation is complex and cannot be solved exactly. Historically, Roche derived the following numerical solution for the Roche Limit:

:<math> d \approx 2.44R\left( \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>

However, with the aid of a computer a better numerical solution is:

:<math> d \approx 2.423 R\left( \frac {\rho_M} {\rho_m} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \left( \frac{(1+\frac{m}{3M})+\frac{c}{3R}(1+\frac{m}{M})}{1-\frac{c}{R}} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} </math>


where <math>c/R</math> is the ] of the primary.
<!--- Numerical solution obtained from http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/RocheLimit.html, <!--- Numerical solution obtained from http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/RocheLimit.html,
equation (17) using the e value given at (20) (= 1.676 554) gives eqn. (21) (= 0.070 310 549), equation (17) using the e value given at (20) (= 1.676 554) gives eqn. (21) (= 0.070 310 549),
extract cubic root and invert. The result is remarkably insensitive to the precision of (20) extract cubic root and invert (=2.422 849 866 704...). The result is insensitive to the
because it is a functional minimum: using e = 1.676600 or 1.676500 changes only the tenth digit ---> precision of (20) because it is a functional minimum: using e = 1.676600 or 1.676500 changes only the tenth digit --->


The fluid solution is appropriate for bodies that are only loosely held together, such as a comet. For instance, ]'s decaying orbit around Jupiter passed within its Roche limit in July 1992, causing it to fragment into a number of smaller pieces. On its next approach in 1994 the fragments crashed into the planet. Shoemaker–Levy 9 was first observed in 1993, but its orbit indicated that it had been captured by Jupiter a few decades prior.<ref> Rob Landis 10–16 July 1994 </ref>
==Roche Limits for selected examples==


== See also ==
The table below shows the mean density and the equatorial radius for selected objects in our ].
{{div col|colwidth=20em}}
{| border="1" padding="4"
* ]
! Body !! Density (kg/m<sup>3</sup>) !! Radius (m)
* ]
|-
* ] (the extreme case of tidal distortion)
| ] ||align="center"| 1,400 ||align="right"|695,000,000
* ]
|-
* ]
| ] ||align="center"|1,330 ||align="right"|71,500,000
* ]
|-
* ] (Neptune's satellite)
| ] ||align="center"| 5,515 ||align="right"| 6,376,500
* ]
|-
{{div col end}}
| ] ||align="center"| 3,340 ||align="right"|1,737,400
|}


== References ==
Using these data, the Roche Limits for rigid and non-rigid bodies can easily be calculated. The average density of ]s is around 500 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. The true Roche Limit depends on the flexibility of the satellite and will be somewhere between the rigid and non-rigid Roche Limit. If the larger body is less than half as dense as the smaller one, the rigid-body Roche Limit is less than the larger body's radius, and the two bodies may collide before the Roche limit is reached (for example, the Sun-Earth Roche Limit). The table below gives the Roche limits expressed in metres and in primary radii.
{{Reflist}}

{| border="1" padding="4"
!rowspan="2"| Body !!rowspan="2"| Satellite !!colspan="2"| Roche limit (rigid) !!colspan="2"| Roche limit (non-rigid)
|-
! Distance (m) !! Radii !! Distance (m) !! Radii
|-
| Earth || Moon ||align="right"| 9,495,665 ||align="center"| 1.49 ||align="right"| 18,261,459 ||align="center"| 2.86
|-
| Earth || Comet ||align="right"| 17,883,432 ||align="center"| 2.80 ||align="right"| 34,392,279 ||align="center"| 5.39
|-
| Sun || Earth ||align="right"| 554,441,389 ||align="center"| 0.80 ||align="right"| 1,066,266,402 ||align="center"| 1.53
|-
| Sun || Jupiter ||align="right"| 890,745,427 ||align="center"| 1.28 ||align="right"| 1,713,024,931 ||align="center"| 2.46
|-
| Sun || Moon ||align="right"| 655,322,872 ||align="center"| 0.94 ||align="right"| 1,260,275,253 ||align="center"| 1.81
|-
| Sun || Comet ||align="right"| 1,234,186,562 ||align="center"| 1.78 ||align="right"| 2,373,509,071 ||align="center"| 3.42
|}

How close are the solar system's moons to their Roche limits? The table below gives each inner satellite's orbital radius divided by its own Roche radius, for both the rigid and non-rigid cases.

{| border="1" padding="4"
!rowspan="2"| Primary !!rowspan="2"| Satellite !!colspan="2"| Orbital Radius : Roche limit
|-
! (rigid) !! (non-rigid)
|-
| Sun || ] ||align="right"| 104:1 ||align="right"| 54:1
|-
| Earth || Moon ||align="right"| 41:1 ||align="right"| 21:1
|-
|rowspan="2"| ] || ] ||align="right"| 171% ||align="right"| 89%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 456% ||align="right"| 237%
|-
|rowspan="4"| ] || ] ||align="right"| 191% ||align="right"| 99%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 192% ||align="right"| 100%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 178% ||align="right"| 93%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 331% ||align="right"| 172%
|-
|rowspan="5"| ] || ] ||align="right"| 177% ||align="right"| 92%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 182% ||align="right"| 95%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 185% ||align="right"| 96%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 188% ||align="right"| 98%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 198% ||align="right"| 103%
|-
|rowspan="4"| ] || ] ||align="right"| 155% ||align="right"| 81%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 168% ||align="right"| 87%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 184% ||align="right"| 96%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 193% ||align="right"| 100%
|-
|rowspan="5"| ] || ] ||align="right"| 144% ||align="right"| 75%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 149% ||align="right"| 78%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 157% ||align="right"| 82%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 184% ||align="right"| 96%
|-
| ] ||align="right"| 219% ||align="right"| 114%
|-
| ] || ] ||align="right"| 13:1 ||align="right"| 6.8:1
|}

==See also==
* ]


==References== == Sources ==
* {{cite book|first=Édouard|last=Roche|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UmoVAAAAQAAJ|chapter=La figure d'une masse fluide soumise à l'attraction d'un point éloigné, part 1|publisher=Académie des sciences de Montpellier|title=Mémoires de la section des sciences, Volume 1|date=1849|pages=243–262}} 2.44 is mentioned on page 258.
* {{cite book|first=Édouard|last=Roche|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UmoVAAAAQAAJ|chapter=La figure d'une masse fluide soumise à l'attraction d'un point éloigné, part 2|publisher=Académie des sciences de Montpellier|title=Mémoires de la section des sciences, Volume 1|date=1850|pages=333–348}}
* {{cite book|first=Édouard|last=Roche|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x3gVAAAAQAAJ|chapter=La figure d'une masse fluide soumise à l'attraction d'un point éloigné, part 3|publisher=Académie des sciences de Montpellier|title=Mémoires de la section des sciences, Volume 2|date=1851|pages=21–32}}
* {{cite book|first=George|last=Howard Darwin|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8dPPAAAAMAAJ|chapter=On the figure and stability of a liquid satellite|title=Scientific Papers, Volume 3|date=1910|pages=436–524}}
* {{cite book|first=James|last=Hopwood Jeans|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=coE-AAAAYAAJ|title=Problems of cosmogony and stellar dynamics|chapter=Chapter III: Ellipsoidal configurations of equilibrium|date=1919}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chandrasekhar |first=Subrahmanyan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=amOfQgAACAAJ |title=Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium |date=1969 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-01116-6 |language=en}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Chandrasekhar |first=S. |year=1963 |title=The Equilibrium and the Stability of the Roche Ellipsoids. |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |language=en |volume=138 |pages=1182 |bibcode=1963ApJ...138.1182C |doi=10.1086/147716 |issn=0004-637X}}


== External links ==
* Édouard Roche: ''La figure d'une masse fluide soumise à l'attraction d'un point éloigné'', Acad. des sciences de Montpellier, Vol. 1 (1847-50) p. 243
* ; {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190916174931/http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/gravity6.htm#Roche |date=2019-09-16 }}
* Tidal Forces Across the Universe&nbsp;– August 2007
*


{{Portal bar|Physics|Astronomy|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System}}
== External link ==
{{Solar System}}
*
{{Authority control}}


] {{DEFAULTSORT:Roche Limit}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 21:56, 26 December 2024

Orbital radius at which a satellite might break up due to gravitational force This article is about the orbit within which particles might form rings or objects on a stable orbit might disintegrate into rings. For the limits at which an orbiting object will be captured, see Roche lobe. For the gravitational sphere of influence of one astronomical body in the face of perturbations from another heavier body around which it orbits, see Roche sphere. A celestial body (yellow) is orbited by a mass of fluid (blue) held together by gravity, here viewed from above the orbital plane. Far from the Roche limit (white line), the mass is practically spherical.Closer to the Roche limit, the body is deformed by tidal forces.Within the Roche limit, the mass's own gravity can no longer withstand the tidal forces, and the body disintegrates.Particles closer to the primary move more quickly than particles farther away, as represented by the red arrows.The varying orbital speed of the material eventually causes it to form a ring.

In celestial mechanics, the Roche limit, also called Roche radius, is the distance from a celestial body within which a second celestial body, held together only by its own force of gravity, will disintegrate because the first body's tidal forces exceed the second body's self-gravitation. Inside the Roche limit, orbiting material disperses and forms rings, whereas outside the limit, material tends to coalesce. The Roche radius depends on the radius of the first body and on the ratio of the bodies' densities.

The term is named after Édouard Roche (French: [ʁɔʃ], English: /rɒʃ/ ROSH), the French astronomer who first calculated this theoretical limit in 1848.

Explanation

Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 was disintegrated by the tidal forces of Jupiter into a string of smaller bodies in 1992, before colliding with the planet in 1994.

The Roche limit typically applies to a satellite's disintegrating due to tidal forces induced by its primary, the body around which it orbits. Parts of the satellite that are closer to the primary are attracted more strongly by gravity from the primary than parts that are farther away; this disparity effectively pulls the near and far parts of the satellite apart from each other, and if the disparity (combined with any centrifugal effects due to the object's spin) is larger than the force of gravity holding the satellite together, it can pull the satellite apart. Some real satellites, both natural and artificial, can orbit within their Roche limits because they are held together by forces other than gravitation. Objects resting on the surface of such a satellite would be lifted away by tidal forces. A weaker satellite, such as a comet, could be broken up when it passes within its Roche limit.

Since, within the Roche limit, tidal forces overwhelm the gravitational forces that might otherwise hold the satellite together, no satellite can gravitationally coalesce out of smaller particles within that limit. Indeed, almost all known planetary rings are located within their Roche limit. (Notable exceptions are Saturn's E-Ring and Phoebe ring. These two rings could possibly be remnants from the planet's proto-planetary accretion disc that failed to coalesce into moonlets, or conversely have formed when a moon passed within its Roche limit and broke apart.)

The gravitational effect occurring below the Roche limit is not the only factor that causes comets to break apart. Splitting by thermal stress, internal gas pressure, and rotational splitting are other ways for a comet to split under stress.

Determination

The limiting distance to which a satellite can approach without breaking up depends on the rigidity of the satellite. At one extreme, a completely rigid satellite will maintain its shape until tidal forces break it apart. At the other extreme, a highly fluid satellite gradually deforms leading to increased tidal forces, causing the satellite to elongate, further compounding the tidal forces and causing it to break apart more readily.

Most real satellites would lie somewhere between these two extremes, with tensile strength rendering the satellite neither perfectly rigid nor perfectly fluid. For example, a rubble-pile asteroid will behave more like a fluid than a solid rocky one; an icy body will behave quite rigidly at first but become more fluid as tidal heating accumulates and its ices begin to melt.

But note that, as defined above, the Roche limit refers to a body held together solely by the gravitational forces which cause otherwise unconnected particles to coalesce, thus forming the body in question. The Roche limit is also usually calculated for the case of a circular orbit, although it is straightforward to modify the calculation to apply to the case (for example) of a body passing the primary on a parabolic or hyperbolic trajectory.

Rigid satellites

The rigid-body Roche limit is a simplified calculation for a spherical satellite. Irregular shapes such as those of tidal deformation on the body or the primary it orbits are neglected. It is assumed to be in hydrostatic equilibrium. These assumptions, although unrealistic, greatly simplify calculations.

The Roche limit for a rigid spherical satellite is the distance, d {\displaystyle d} , from the primary at which the gravitational force on a test mass at the surface of the object is exactly equal to the tidal force pulling the mass away from the object:

d = R M ( 2 ρ M ρ m ) 1 3 {\displaystyle d=R_{M}\left(2{\frac {\rho _{M}}{\rho _{m}}}\right)^{\frac {1}{3}}}

where R M {\displaystyle R_{M}} is the radius of the primary, ρ M {\displaystyle \rho _{M}} is the density of the primary, and ρ m {\displaystyle \rho _{m}} is the density of the satellite. This can be equivalently written as

d = R m ( 2 M M M m ) 1 3 {\displaystyle d=R_{m}\left(2{\frac {M_{M}}{M_{m}}}\right)^{\frac {1}{3}}}

where R m {\displaystyle R_{m}} is the radius of the secondary, M M {\displaystyle M_{M}} is the mass of the primary, and M m {\displaystyle M_{m}} is the mass of the secondary. A third equivalent form uses only one property for each of the two bodies, the mass of the primary and the density of the secondary, is

d = 0.7816 ( M M ρ m ) 1 3 {\displaystyle d=0.7816\left({\frac {M_{M}}{\rho _{m}}}\right)^{\frac {1}{3}}}

These all represent the orbital distance inside of which loose material (e.g. regolith) on the surface of the satellite closest to the primary would be pulled away, and likewise material on the side opposite the primary will also go away from, rather than toward, the satellite.

Fluid satellites

A more accurate approach for calculating the Roche limit takes the deformation of the satellite into account. An extreme example would be a tidally locked liquid satellite orbiting a planet, where any force acting upon the satellite would deform it into a prolate spheroid.

The calculation is complex and its result cannot be represented in an exact algebraic formula. Roche himself derived the following approximate solution for the Roche limit:

d 2.44 R ( ρ M ρ m ) 1 / 3 {\displaystyle d\approx 2.44R\left({\frac {\rho _{M}}{\rho _{m}}}\right)^{1/3}}

However, a better approximation that takes into account the primary's oblateness and the satellite's mass is:

d 2.423 R ( ρ M ρ m ) 1 / 3 ( ( 1 + m 3 M ) + c 3 R ( 1 + m M ) 1 c / R ) 1 / 3 {\displaystyle d\approx 2.423R\left({\frac {\rho _{M}}{\rho _{m}}}\right)^{1/3}\left({\frac {(1+{\frac {m}{3M}})+{\frac {c}{3R}}(1+{\frac {m}{M}})}{1-c/R}}\right)^{1/3}}

where c / R {\displaystyle c/R} is the oblateness of the primary.

The fluid solution is appropriate for bodies that are only loosely held together, such as a comet. For instance, comet Shoemaker–Levy 9's decaying orbit around Jupiter passed within its Roche limit in July 1992, causing it to fragment into a number of smaller pieces. On its next approach in 1994 the fragments crashed into the planet. Shoemaker–Levy 9 was first observed in 1993, but its orbit indicated that it had been captured by Jupiter a few decades prior.

See also

References

  1. Weisstein, Eric W. (2007). "Eric Weisstein's World of Physics – Roche Limit". scienceworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved September 5, 2007.
  2. NASA. "What is the Roche limit?". NASA – JPL. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2007.
  3. see calculation in Frank H. Shu, The Physical Universe: an Introduction to Astronomy, p. 431, University Science Books (1982), ISBN 0-935702-05-9.
  4. "Roche Limit: Why Do Comets Break Up?". Archived from the original on 2013-05-15. Retrieved 2012-08-28.
  5. International Planetarium Society Conference, Astronaut Memorial Planetarium & Observatory, Cocoa, Florida Rob Landis 10–16 July 1994 archive 21/12/1996

Sources

External links

Portals:
Solar System
The Sun, the planets, their moons, and several trans-Neptunian objectsThe SunMercuryVenusThe MoonEarthMarsPhobos and DeimosCeresThe main asteroid beltJupiterMoons of JupiterRings of JupiterSaturnMoons of SaturnRings of SaturnUranusMoons of UranusRings of UranusNeptuneMoons of NeptuneRings of NeptunePlutoMoons of PlutoHaumeaMoons of HaumeaMakemakeS/2015 (136472) 1The Kuiper BeltErisDysnomiaThe Scattered DiscThe Hills CloudThe Oort Cloud
Planets,
dwarfs,
minors
Moons
Formation,
evolution
,
contents,
and
History
Rings
Hypothetical
objects
Exploration
(outline)
Small
Solar
System
bodies
Lists
Related

Solar System → Local Interstellar Cloud → Local Bubble → Gould Belt → Orion Arm → Milky Way → Milky Way subgroup → Local GroupLocal SheetVirgo SuperclusterLaniakea Supercluster → Local Hole → Observable universe → Universe
Each arrow (→) may be read as "within" or "part of".

Categories: