Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Vladlena Funk: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:00, 4 July 2013 editHuon (talk | contribs)Administrators51,324 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Vladlena Funk. (TW)  Latest revision as of 08:54, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''. ] (]) ''']''' (] • ] • ]) 12:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Vladlena Funk}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Vladlena Funk}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
:({{Find sources|Vladlena Funk}}) :({{Find sources|Vladlena Funk}})
None of the ] third-party sources, of which there are rather few in the first place, mention the subject at all. Google News shows a few passing mentions in relation to a bizarre abduction to Belarus, but no significant coverage - at best ] applies. Besides the general lack of notability, the article has severe problems with ], ] and ]. ] had told me of the article and said that there were others of the same "quality"; it may be worthwhile to go looking for them. I'll also notify ]. ] (]) 04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC) None of the ] third-party sources, of which there are rather few in the first place, mention the subject at all. Google News shows a few passing mentions in relation to a bizarre abduction to Belarus, but no significant coverage - at best ] applies. Besides the general lack of notability, the article has severe problems with ], ] and ]. ] had told me of the article and said that there were others of the same "quality"; it may be worthwhile to go looking for them. I'll also notify ]. ] (]) 04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. —]]] 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)</small>
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Segoe script;">]]</span> 03:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 11:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 08:54, 11 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Vladlena Funk

Vladlena Funk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the reliable third-party sources, of which there are rather few in the first place, mention the subject at all. Google News shows a few passing mentions in relation to a bizarre abduction to Belarus, but no significant coverage - at best WP:BLP1E applies. Besides the general lack of notability, the article has severe problems with WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. ImmortalPanda had told me of the article and said that there were others of the same "quality"; it may be worthwhile to go looking for them. I'll also notify WT:WikiProject Belarus. Huon (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 05:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti 03:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 11:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.