Revision as of 02:14, 7 July 2013 editTisthammerw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,242 edits Noted that research shows no meaningful difference in the nutritional values of pasteurized and unpasteurized milk, and cited a credible source for this fact.Tag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:34, 28 December 2024 edit undo2001:a62:1431:ab02:c5c7:3b88:22e:a5a0 (talk) →History of raw milk and pasteurizationTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
(634 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Milk that has not been pasteurized}} | |||
] | |||
], France]] | |||
'''Raw milk''' is ] that has not been ] or ]. Health food proponents tout the benefits of raw milk and the ills of pasteurization and homogenization.<ref name=sciam>{{cite web | |||
'''Raw milk''' or '''unpasteurized milk''' is ] that has not undergone ], a process of heating liquid foods to kill ]s for safe consumption and extension of shelf life.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Beecher |first=Cookson |date=12 January 2016 |title=Raw milk's 'explosive growth' comes with costs to the state |url=http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2016/01/raw-milks-explosive-growth-comes-with-costs-to-the-state/ |access-date=24 January 2016 |work=] |location=Seattle}}</ref> | |||
| url = http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=raw-milk-debate | |||
| title = Got ''E. coli''? Raw Milk's Appeal Grows Despite Health Risks | |||
| author = Terri Peterson Smith | |||
| date = 31 August 2010 | |||
| work = ] | |||
| publisher = | |||
| accessdate = 18 September 2012 | |||
}}</ref> The medical community warns of the dangers of not pasteurizing milk.<ref name=sciam /> Preferences vary from region to region. | |||
Proponents of raw milk have asserted numerous supposed benefits to consumption, including better ], better ], contributions to the building of a healthy ] and protection from allergies.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sozańska |first1=Barbara |title=Raw Cow's Milk and Its Protective Effect on Allergies and Asthma |journal=Nutrients |date=22 February 2019 |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=469 |doi=10.3390/nu11020469 |pmc=6413174 |pmid=30813365 |doi-access=free }}</ref> However, no clear benefit to consumption has been found; the medical community notes there is increased risk of contracting dangerous ] from these products.<ref name="sciam">{{cite news |last1=Smith |first1=Terri Peterson |title=Got E. coli? Raw Milk's Appeal Grows Despite Health Risks |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/raw-milk-debate/ |work=Scientific American |date=31 August 2010 }}</ref> Substantial evidence of this increased risk, combined with a lack of any clear benefit, has led countries around the world to either prohibit the sale of raw milk or require warning labels on packaging when sold. | |||
==History== | |||
Humans consumed raw milk exclusively prior to the industrial revolution and the invention of the ] process in 1864. During the industrial revolution large populations congregated into urban areas detached from the agricultural lifestyle. | |||
In countries where it is available for sale, its availability and regulations around its sale vary. In the ], individual ] can prohibit or restrict the sale of raw milk, but it is not banned outright; in some member states, the sale of raw milk through vending machines is permitted, though the packaging will typically instruct consumers to boil before consumption.<ref>{{Cite web |date=13 January 2015 |title=Raw drinking milk: what are the risks? |url=https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/150113 |access-date=2021-10-26 |website=www.efsa.europa.eu |language=en}}</ref> In the ], some dairies have adopted ''low-temperature vat pasteurization'', which they say produces a product similar to raw milk.{{Citation needed|date=July 2023}} | |||
] was first used in the United States in the 1890s after the discovery of ] to control the hazards of highly contagious bacterial diseases including ] and ] that was thought to be easily transmitted to humans through the drinking of raw milk.<ref>''An Impossible Undertaking: The Eradication of Bovine Tuberculosis in the United States'', Alan L. Olmstead and Paul W. Rhode, The Journal of Economic History (2004), 64 : 734-772 Cambridge University Press, Copyright © 2004 The Economic History Association, {{doi|10.1017/S0022050704002955}}</ref> Initially after the scientific discovery of ], no product testing was available to determine if a farmer's milk was safe or infected, so all milk was treated as potentially contagious. After the first test was developed, some farmers actively worked to prevent their infected animals from being killed and removed from food production, or would falsify the test results so that their animals would appear to be free of infection.<ref>''Not on My Farm!: Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication in the United States'', Alan L. Olmstead and Paul W. Rhode, January 2005, The Journal of Economic History (2007), 67 : 768-809 Cambridge University Press, Copyright © 2007 The Economic History Association, {{doi|10.1017/S0022050707000307}}</ref> | |||
==History of raw milk and pasteurization== | |||
Pasteurization is widely used to prevent infected milk from entering the food supply. The recognition of many potentially deadly pathogens, such as ''E. coli'' O157:H7, Listeria, and Salmonella, and their presence in milk products has led to the continuation of pasteurization. The Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and other health agencies of the United States strongly recommend that the public do not consume raw milk or raw milk products.<ref name=":0"></ref> Young children, the elderly, people with weakened immune systems, and pregnant women are particularly susceptible to infections originating in raw milk.<ref></ref> | |||
] | |||
Humans first learned to regularly consume the milk of other mammals following the domestication of animals during the ] or the development of agriculture. This development occurred independently in several places around the world from as early as 9000–7000 BC in ]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bellwood |first=Peter |title=First Farmers: the origins of agricultural societies |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-631-20566-1 |location=Malden, MA |pages=44–68 |chapter=The Beginnings of Agriculture in Southwest Asia}}</ref> to 3500–3000 BC in the Americas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bellwood |first=Peter |title=First Farmers: the origins of agricultural societies |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-631-20566-1 |location=Malden, MA |pages=146–79 |chapter=Early Agriculture in the Americas}}</ref> The most important dairy animals—cattle, sheep and goats—were first domesticated in Mesopotamia, although domestic cattle had been independently derived from wild ] populations several times since.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Beja-Pereira |first1=A. |last2=Caramelli |first2=D. |last3=Lalueza-Fox |first3=C. |last4=Vernesi |first4=C. |last5=Ferrand |first5=N. |last6=Casoli |first6=A. |last7=Goyache |first7=F. |last8=Royo |first8=L. J. |last9=Conti |first9=S. |last10=Lari |first10=M. |last11=Martini |first11=A. |last12=Ouragh |first12=L. |last13=Magid |first13=A. |last14=Atash |first14=A. |last15=Zsolnai |first15=A. |year=2006 |title=The origin of European cattle: Evidence from modern and ancient DNA |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=103 |issue=21 |pages=8113–18 |bibcode=2006PNAS..103.8113B |doi=10.1073/pnas.0509210103 |pmc=1472438 |pmid=16690747 |doi-access=free |last16=Boscato |first16=P. |last17=Triantaphylidis |first17=C. |last18=Ploumi |first18=K. |last19=Sineo |first19=L. |last20=Mallegni |first20=F. |last21=Taberlet |first21=P. |last22=Erhardt |first22=G. |last23=Sampietro |first23=L. |last24=Bertranpetit |first24=J. |last25=Barbujani |first25=G. |last26=Luikart |first26=G. |last27=Bertorelle |first27=G.}}</ref> From there dairy animals spread to Europe (beginning around 7000 BC but not reaching Britain and Scandinavia until after 4000 BC),<ref>{{Cite book |last=Price |first=T. D. |url=https://archive.org/details/europesfirstfarm00pric |title=Europe's First Farmers |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-521-66203-1 |editor-last=T. D. Price |location=Cambridge |pages= |chapter=Europe's first farmers: an introduction |url-access=limited}}</ref> and ] (7000–5500 BC).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Meadow |first=R. H. |title=The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia |publisher=UCL Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-1-85728-538-3 |editor-last=D. R. Harris |location=London |pages=390–412 |chapter=The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in northwestern South Asia}}</ref> | |||
Recent advances in the analysis of milk-borne diseases have enabled scientists to track the DNA of the infectious bacteria to the cows on the farms that supplied the raw milk.<ref></ref> | |||
Pasteurization is widely used to prevent infected milk from entering the food supply. The pasteurization process was developed in 1864 by French scientist ], who discovered that heating beer and wine was enough to kill most of the ]s that caused spoilage, preventing these beverages from turning sour. The process achieves this by eliminating pathogenic microbes and lowering microbial numbers to prolong the shelf life of the beverage. | |||
==Raw vs. pasteurized debate== | |||
After sufficient scientific study led to the development of ], pasteurization was introduced in the United States in the 1890s. This move successfully controlled the spread of highly contagious bacterial diseases, including '']'', ], and ] (all thought to be easily transmitted to humans through the drinking of raw milk).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Olmstead |first1=Alan L. |last2=Rhode |first2=Paul W. |year=2004 |title=An Impossible Undertaking: The Eradication of Bovine Tuberculosis in the United States |journal=The Journal of Economic History |volume=64 |issue=3 |pages=734–72 |doi=10.1017/S0022050704002955 }}</ref> In the early days after the scientific discovery of bacteria, there was no product testing to determine whether a farmer's milk was safe or infected, so all milk was treated as potentially contagious. After the first tests were developed, some farmers took steps to prevent their infected animals from being killed and removed from food production, sometimes even falsifying test results to make their animals appear free of infection.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Olmstead |first1=Alan L. |last2=Rhode |first2=Paul W. |year=2007 |title=Not on My Farm!: Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication in the United States |journal=The Journal of Economic History |volume=67 |issue=3 |pages=768–809 |doi=10.1017/S0022050707000307 }}</ref> Recent advances in the analysis of milk-borne diseases have enabled scientists to ] of the infectious bacteria to the cows on the farms that supplied the raw milk.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blum |first=Deborah |date=19 July 2010 |title=The Raw-Milk Deal |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/life/food/2010/07/the_rawmilk_deal.html |journal=Slate}}</ref> | |||
The raw vs. pasteurized debate pits the alleged health benefits of consuming raw milk against the pathogen risk associated with drinking raw milk. Agencies such as the ] (CDC), and the ] (FDA) in the United States, and other regulatory agencies around the world say that ] from raw milk make it unsafe to consume, | |||
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2007/ucm108856.htm|title=FDA and CDC Remind Consumers of the Dangers of Drinking Raw Milk|publisher=US FDA|date=March 1, 2007| accessdate=2009-06-05}}</ref> | |||
.<ref name="fda.gov">{{cite web|url=http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm079516.htm|title=The Dangers of Raw Milk: Unpasteurized Milk Can Pose a Serious Health Risk}}</ref> Raw milk advocates, such as the ], say that raw milk can be produced hygienically, and that it has health benefits that are destroyed in the pasteurization process.<ref name=sciam /> However, research shows no meaningful difference in the nutritional values of pasteurized and unpasteurized milk.<ref name=":0" /> The bacteria found in raw milk are essential to the flavors of many cheeses.<ref>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/28/cheese/</ref> | |||
The recognition of many potentially deadly pathogens, such as ], '']'', '']'', and '']'', and their possible presence in poorly produced milk products has led to the continuation of pasteurization. The ], ], and other health agencies of the United States strongly recommend that the public not consume raw milk or raw milk products.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Nutrition |first=Center for Food Safety and Applied |date=12 August 2021 |title=Consumers – The Dangers of Raw Milk: Unpasteurized Milk Can Pose a Serious Health Risk |url=https://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm079516.htm |website=www.fda.gov}}</ref> Young children, the elderly, people with weakened immune systems, and pregnant women are more susceptible to infections originating in raw milk.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Raw Milk and Cheeses: Health Risks are Still Black and White |url=https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/cheesespotlight/cheese_spotlight.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111030003955/http://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/cheesespotlight/cheese_spotlight.htm |archive-date=2011-10-30 |access-date=2018-12-29}}</ref> | |||
==Legal status== | |||
==Uses== | |||
Regulation of the commercial distribution of packaged raw milk varies across the world. Some countries have complete bans, but many had partial bans that do not restrict the purchase of raw milk bought directly from the farmer. Raw milk is sometimes distributed through a cow share program, wherein the consumer owns a share in the dairy animal or the herd, and can be considered to be consuming milk from their own animal. Raw milk is sometimes marketed for animal or pet consumption, or for other uses such as ] in places where sales for human consumption are prohibited. | |||
Some cheeses are produced with raw milk, although local statutes vary regarding what health precautions must be followed, such as aging cheese for a certain amount of time.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 February 2024 |title=Raw milk |url=http://www.foodsafetynews.com/tag/raw-milk-cheese/#.UpkgHieIofB |website=]}}</ref> A large proportion of the US population eats several different kinds of cheese made with raw milk, including aged ]. | |||
The first ] was made from raw milk, and the {{lang|fr|]}} (AOC) variety "''Camembert de Normandie''" (approximately 10% of all camembert production) is required by law to be made only with unpasteurized milk. Many modern cheesemakers, however, use pasteurized milk for safety, compliance with regulations, or convenience.<ref name="smith">{{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Tim |title=Making artisan cheese: 50 fine cheeses that you can make in your own kitchen |publisher=Quarry Books |year=2005 |isbn=1-59253-197-0 |location=Beverly, Massachusetts}}</ref> | |||
A thick mixture known as ] was created by ]s squirting milk directly from a cow into a container of cider, beer<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Experienced English Housekeeper, 1769 |url=http://www.foodsofengland.co.uk/book1769raffald.htm}}</ref> or other beverage.<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 July 2005 |title=Syllabub |url=http://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclopedia/5149/#c33332}}</ref> | |||
Raw yak milk can ferment overnight to become ]. | |||
==Health effects== | |||
===Infectivity=== | |||
The potential ] from raw milk include ], ], ], '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and ]<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-06-08 |title=Raw Milk |url=https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-index.html |access-date=24 November 2017 |website=cdc.gov |publisher=(US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}}</ref> and make it potentially unsafe to consume.<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 1, 2007 |title=FDA and CDC Remind Consumers of the Dangers of Drinking Raw Milk |url=https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2007/ucm108856.htm |access-date=2009-06-05 |publisher=US FDA}}</ref><ref name="fda.gov">{{Cite web |date=12 August 2021 |title=The Dangers of Raw Milk: Unpasteurized Milk Can Pose a Serious Health Risk |url=https://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm079516.htm |website=fda.gov |publisher=(US) Food and Drug Administration}}</ref> Moreover, a review published in 2012 by the ] ] alongside experts from several Belgian universities and institutions concluded that "raw milk poses a realistic health threat due to a possible contamination with human pathogens. It is therefore strongly recommended that milk should be heated before consumption."<ref name="Claeys2013">{{Cite journal |last1=Claeys |first1=Wendy L. |last2=Sabine Cardoen |last3=Georges Daube |last4=Jan De Block |last5=Koen Dewettinck |last6=Katelijne Dierick |last7=Lieven De Zutter |last8=André Huyghebaert |last9=Hein Imberechts |last10=Pierre Thiange |last11=Yvan Vandenplas |last12=Lieve Herman |date=May 2013 |title=Raw or heated cow milk consumption: Review of risks and benefits |journal=Food Control |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=251–62 |doi=10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.09.035 }}</ref> | |||
Even with precautions and cold storage (optimally {{cvt|3–4|C|disp=or}}),<ref> in: {{Cite book |last=Isao Yumoto |title=Cold-Adapted Microorganisms |publisher=Caister Academic Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-1908230904}}</ref> raw milk has a shelf life of 3 to 5 days.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cindu Annand, David Grewell, Stephanie Clark |title=Impact of Batch Thermosonication on Plasmin Activity in Stored Skim Milk: Time-amplitude Effects |url=http://ultrasonics.org/aws/UIA/asset_manager/get_file/123927?ver=4 |access-date=2019-03-27 |website=Ultrasonics Industry Association (UIA)}}</ref> | |||
A 2024 study showed that ] virus can survive in refrigerated raw milk for several days.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Zulli |first=Alessandro |last2=Zhang |first2=Mengyang |last3=Jong |first3=Sehee |last4=Blish |first4=Catherine |last5=Boehm |first5=Alexandria B. |date=2024-12-12 |title=Infectivity and Persistence of Influenza A Virus in Raw Milk |url=https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00971 |journal=Environmental Science & Technology Letters |doi=10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00971}}</ref> | |||
The ] spread to dairy cattle in 2024, and influenza was detected in commercial milk supplies in the United States. The ] warned (as has been its long-standing position) that consumers should avoid raw milk because its ability to transmit influenza to humans is unknown, but pasteurization is believed to inactivate the virus.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Pien Huang |last2=Chiara Eisner |date=May 15, 2024 |title=A bird flu outbreak among dairy cows sparks new warnings about unpasteurized milk |url=https://www.npr.org/2024/05/15/1251647612/a-bird-flu-outbreak-among-dairy-cows-sparks-new-warnings-about-unpasteurized-mil |website=]}}</ref> A high mortality rate was observed among cats that drank raw milk from cows displaying symptoms of H5N1 infection.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Burrough |first1=Eric |last2=Magstadt |first2=Drew |last3=Main |first3=Rodger |date=29 April 2024 |title=Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b Virus Infection in Domestic Dairy Cattle and Cats, United States, 2024 |url=https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/30/7/24-0508_article |journal=Emerging Infectious Diseases |volume=30 |issue=7 |pages=1335–1343 |doi=10.3201/eid3007.240508 |pmc=11210653 |pmid=38683888 |access-date=30 April 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-04-30 |title=More than half of cats died after drinking raw milk from bird flu-infected cows - CBS News |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cats-died-after-drinking-milk-bird-flu-infected-cows/ |access-date=2024-05-01 |website=www.cbsnews.com |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
=== Epidemiology === | |||
Before pasteurized milk was adopted in the US, public health officials were concerned with cow milk transmission of bovine tuberculosis to humans, with an estimated 10% of all tuberculosis cases in humans being attributed to milk consumption.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal |last=Lucey |first=John |date=July–August 2015 |title=Raw Milk Consumption: Risks and Benefits |journal=Nutrition and Food Science |volume=50 |issue=4 |pages=189–93 |doi=10.1097/NT.0000000000000108 |pmc=4890836 |pmid=27340300}}</ref> Along with specific diseases, officials continue to be concerned about outbreaks. With modern pasteurization and sanitation practices, milk accounts for less than 1% of reported outbreaks caused by food and water consumption. By comparison, raw milk was associated with 25% of all disease outbreaks from food/water during the time before World War II in the U.S.<ref name=":02" /> From a public health standpoint, pasteurization has decreased the percentage of milk associated food/water borne outbreaks. | |||
Between 2007 and 2016, there were 144 outbreaks connected to raw milk consumption in the United States.<ref name="CDCRawMilk">{{Cite web |last=CDC |date=2018-02-20 |title=Raw (Unpasteurized) Milk |url=https://www.cdc.gov/features/rawmilk/index.html |access-date=2018-12-05 |website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |language=en-us}}</ref> Because raw milk production skips the pasteurization process, the germs that are normally removed remain in the milk product. Exposure to raw milk containing harmful germs threatens infection, resulting from bacteria including ''Campylobacter'', ''Cryptosporidium'', ''E. coli'', ''Listeria'', and ''Salmonella''. Additionally, depending on the severity of the infection, there may be further threats to human health. Infection has the potential to induce serious illnesses such as ] and ] (HUS). Because of the vulnerability of developing and degrading immune systems, children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those who are immunocompromised are at a heightened risk of experiencing infection from raw milk consumption.<ref name=CDCRawMilk/> | |||
Outbreaks have occurred from consuming food products made with raw milk. One of the potential pathogens in raw milk, ''Listeria monocytogenes'', can survive the pasteurization process and contaminate post-pasteurization environments. Milk and dairy products made with that milk then become recontaminated. Consistent contamination persists by bacteria survival in ]s within the processing systems. | |||
One food item that has commonly used raw milk in its production in the past is cheese. Several different types of cheeses made with raw milk are consumed by a large portion of the United States population, including ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Oliver |first1=S.P. |last2=Jayarao |first2=B.M. |last3=Almeida |first3=R.A. |year=2005 |title=Foodborne Pathogens in Milk and the Dairy Farm Environment: Food Safety and Public Health Implications |journal=Foodborne Pathogens and Disease |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=115–29 |doi=10.1089/fpd.2005.2.115 |pmid=15992306 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Since ] has a 60-day aging period before its consumption, it has previously been hypothesized that no bacteria would persist through that time. A review study published in the ''Journal of Food Protection'' showed that ] can persist through the aging period of Gouda cheese. The study's evidence included three outbreaks before 2013 associated with this specific strain of ''E. coli'' in Gouda.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Currie |first=A. |date=2018 |title=Outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 Infections Linked to Aged Raw Milk Gouda Cheese |journal=Journal of Food Protection |volume=81 |issue=2 |pages=325–31 |doi=10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-283 |pmid=29369688 |doi-access=free}}</ref> | |||
===Nutrition and allergy=== | |||
"With the exception of an altered organoleptic profile, heating (particularly ultra-high temperature and similar treatments) will not substantially change the nutritional value of raw milk or other benefits associated with raw milk consumption."<ref name="Claeys2013" /> | |||
Raw milk advocates, such as the ], say that raw milk can be produced hygienically and that it has health benefits that are destroyed in the pasteurization process.<ref name="sciam" /> Research shows only very slight differences in the nutritional values of pasteurized and unpasteurized milk.<ref name=":0" /><ref name="Claeys2013" /> | |||
Proponents of raw milk in the US typically argue that while pasteurization may kill dangerous bacteria, it also kills off good bacteria claimed to have health benefits not present in pasteurized milk.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 2000 |title=A Campaign for Real Milk/The Weston A. Price Foundation |url=http://www.realmilk.com/what.html}}</ref> The United States ] has stated that this is false, and that pasteurizing milk does not destroy any of its nutritional value.<ref name="fda.gov" /> | |||
One study used mice to evaluate the difference in nutritional values between raw and pasteurized milk. Mice were separated into two groups: a pasteurized milk group and a raw milk group. Each group consisted of breeding pairs. The study's conclusion measured no significant difference in pasteurized to raw milk-consuming mice weights. Birth weights were measured from each group, and no significant differences were observed. Overall, the study showed no significant measurable difference in nutritional value in the growth and fertility of mice.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sholing |first1=Kari |last2=Ganong |first2=Lindsay |last3=Olson |first3=Amy |year=2011 |title=What are the Effects of Raw vs. Pasteurized Milk Consumption on Growth Rate and Fertility in a Colony of Mice? |url=https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=nutrition_students |journal=Nutrition Student Work |issue=2}}</ref> | |||
Three studies have found an inverse relationship between consumption of raw milk and ] and ].<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Perkin MR, Strachan DP |date=June 2006 |title=Which aspects of the farming lifestyle explain the inverse association with childhood allergy? |journal=J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. |volume=117 |issue=6 |pages=1374–81 |doi=10.1016/j.jaci.2006.03.008 |pmid=16751000}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Waser M |last2=Michels KB |last3=Bieli C |last4=Flöistrup |first4=H. |last5=Pershagen |first5=G. |last6=Von Mutius |first6=E. |last7=Ege |first7=M. |last8=Riedler |first8=J. |last9=Schram-Bijkerk |first9=D. |display-authors=3 |name-list-style=vanc |date=May 2007 |title=Inverse association of farm milk consumption with asthma and allergy in rural and suburban populations across Europe |journal=Clin. Exp. Allergy |volume=37 |issue=5 |pages=661–70 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02640.x |pmid=17456213 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Loss |first1=G |last2=Apprich |first2=S |last3=Waser |first3=M |last4=Kneifel |first4=W |last5=Genuneit |first5=J |last6=Büchele |first6=G |last7=Weber |first7=J |last8=Sozanska |first8=B |last9=Danielewicz |first9=H |last10=Horak |first10=E |last11=van Neerven |first11=RJ |last12=Heederik |first12=D |last13=Lorenzen |first13=PC |last14=von Mutius |first14=E |last15=Braun-Fahrländer |first15=C |year=2011 |title=The protective effect of farm milk consumption on childhood asthma and atopy: the GABRIELA study |journal=J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. |volume=128 |issue=4 |pages=766–73 |doi=10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.048 |pmid=21875744 |hdl-access=free |hdl=1874/407013}}</ref> However, all of these studies have been performed in children living on farms and living a farming lifestyle, rather than comparing urban children living typical urban lifestyles and with typical urban exposures based on consumption or nonconsumption of raw milk. Aspects of the overall urban vs. farming environment lifestyle have been suggested as having a role in these differences. For this reason, the overall phenomenon has been named the "farm effect". A recent scientific review concluded that "most studies alluding to a possible protective effect of raw milk consumption do not contain any objective confirmation of the raw milk's status or a direct comparison with heat-treated milk. Moreover, it seems that the observed increased resistance seems to be rather related to the exposure to a farm environment or to animals than to raw milk consumption."<ref name="Claeys2013" /> For example, in the largest of these studies,<ref name="GABRIELA2012">{{Cite journal |vauthors=Illi S, Depner M, Genuneit J, Horak E, Loss G, Strunz-Lehner C, Büchele G, Boznanski A, Danielewicz H, Cullinan P, Heederik D, Braun-Fahrländer C, von Mutius E, ((GABRIELA Study Group)) |date=June 2012 |title=Protection from childhood asthma and allergy in Alpine farm environments – the GABRIEL Advanced Studies. |journal=J Allergy Clin Immunol |volume=129 |issue=6 |pages=1470–77 |doi=10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.013 |pmid=22534534 |hdl-access=free |hdl=1874/272655}}</ref> exposure to cows and straw as well as raw milk were associated with lower rates of asthma and exposure to animal feed storage rooms and manure with lower rates of atopic dermatitis; "the effect on hay fever and ] could not be completely explained by the questionnaire items themselves or their diversity."<ref name="GABRIELA2012" /> | |||
==Legal status== | |||
Regulation of the commercial distribution of packaged raw milk varies around the world. Some countries have complete bans, but many do not restrict the purchase of raw milk directly from the farmer. Raw milk is sometimes distributed through a program in which the consumer owns a share in the dairy animal or the herd and, therefore, can be considered to be consuming milk from their own animal, which is legal.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Drew Falkenstein |date=November 12, 2009 |title=Cow Share Agreements: Fooling Nobody |url=http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2009/11/skirting-the-law-with-cow-share-agreements/#.U2UbjaKPOM1 |website=]}}</ref> Raw milk is sometimes marketed for animal or pet consumption or for other uses such as ] in places where sales for human consumption are prohibited. | |||
===Africa=== | ===Africa=== | ||
Although milk consumption in Africa is fairly low compared to the rest of the world, in tribes where milk consumption is popular, such as the ] tribe, milk is typically consumed unpasteurized. | Although milk consumption in Africa is fairly low compared to the rest of the world, in tribes where milk consumption is popular, such as the ] tribe, milk is typically consumed unpasteurized.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}} | ||
===Asia=== | ===Asia=== | ||
In rural areas of Asia where milk consumption is popular, milk is typically unpasteurized. In large |
In rural areas of Asia, where milk consumption is popular, milk is typically unpasteurized. In large Asian cities, raw milk is typical, especially from ]. In most countries of Asia, laws prohibiting raw milk are nonexistent or rarely enforced.{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}} Milk labeled as "raw" ({{transliteration|ja|nama}}) is available in Japan. Still, the designation means it is 100% raw whole milk before being pasteurized. Unpasteurized milk is very uncommon in Japan.<ref></ref> In Singapore, the sale of raw milk for human consumption is prohibited due to safety concerns outlined by the ].<ref></ref> | ||
However, while milk is sold raw in these areas, household milk is usually consumed after boiling.{{Or|date=July 2010}} | |||
In India, milk is often drunk raw, although milk supplied in major cities is sometimes pasteurized. Pasteurized or not, milk is often boiled in homes before consumption.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}} | |||
===Europe=== | ===Europe=== | ||
], a famous ], which is required by European law to be made from raw sheep's milk |
], a famous ], which is required by European Union law to be made from raw sheep's milk]] | ||
According to the regulations in the ] all raw milk products are "legal" and considered "safe for human consumption", and can be sold without any price, variety or quantity restrictions. However, the European countries are free to add certain requirements, usually special sanitary regulations and frequent quality tests (at least once per month) are mandatory.<ref></ref> | |||
In the European Union, raw milk and products made with raw milk must be labeled to indicate this.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2004 |title=Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin |url=https://www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/Reg853_2004%281%29.pdf |access-date=14 September 2015 |quote=In addition to the requirements of Directive 2000/13/EC, except in the cases envisaged in Article 13(4) and (5) of that Directive, labelling must clearly show: (a) in the case of raw milk intended for direct human consumption, the words 'raw milk'; (b) in the case of products made with raw milk, the manufacturing process for which does not include any heat treatment or any physical or chemical treatment, the words 'made with raw milk'.}}</ref> Under EU hygiene rules, ] can prohibit or restrict the placing on the market of raw milk intended for human consumption.<ref></ref> Individual member states can also implement stricter requirements. Usually, special sanitary regulations and frequent quality tests (at least once per month){{explain|reason=Tests for whom?|date=March 2022}} are mandatory.<ref>{{Cite web |title=EU Food Laws (Frame) |url=http://www.reading.ac.uk/foodlaw/f-eu-law.htm |website=www.reading.ac.uk}}</ref> | |||
====France==== | ====France==== | ||
Raw milk |
Raw milk cheeses make up about 18 percent of France's total cheese production and are considered far superior to cheeses made from pasteurized milk.<ref></ref> Many French cuisine traditionalists consider pasteurized cheeses almost a sacrilege. Many traditional French cheeses have solely been made from raw milk for hundreds of years.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Cheese etiquette; discovering cheese; wine and cheese; raw milk; fromages français |url=http://www.understandfrance.org/Food/Cheese.html |website=www.understandfrance.org}}</ref> Unpasteurised cheese in France is the major source of staphylococcal food poisoning.<ref>Jodi A. Lindsay. Genomics of Staphylococcus pp. 237–65 in Genomics of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Editors: Martin Wiedmann, Wei Zhang. Springer, 2011. {{ISBN|978-1441976857}}. p. 242</ref><ref>Mody RK and Griffin PM. Foodborne Illness. Chapter 103 in Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases: Expert Consult Premium Edition. Editors John E. Bennett, Raphael Dolin, and Martin J. Blaser. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014 {{ISBN|978-1455748013}}. </ref> | ||
====Germany==== | ====Germany==== | ||
In Germany, raw milk |
In Germany, packaged raw milk may be sold in shops under the name {{lang|de|Vorzugsmilch}}.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719061622/http://www.milch-und-mehr.de/de/11758-Vorzugsmilch |date=2011-07-19 }}</ref> The raw milk has to be packed before vending, with the necessary information (producer, shelf life, and special warnings) written on the product. The distribution license has stringent quality restrictions; {{as of|2012|lc=y}}, just 80 farmers in Germany had a license.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Erzeugerbetriebe - Bundesverband der Vorzugsmilcherzeuger und Direktvermarkter von Milch und Milchprodukten |url=http://www.milch-und-mehr.de/de/11761-Erzeugerbetriebe |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307122727/http://www.milch-und-mehr.de/de/11761-Erzeugerbetriebe |archive-date=2016-03-07 |access-date=2012-09-15}}</ref> | ||
Unpackaged raw milk may only be sold under specific conditions. It must: | |||
* |
* only be sold at the farm where it was produced | ||
* be from the day of or the day before production | |||
* only milk from that farm | |||
* |
* have a warning label "Raw Milk – boil before use" | ||
* must have a warning label "Raw Milk - boil before usage" | |||
====Ireland==== | |||
It is sold widely in all health food stores, large supermarkets, ] delis and ] sections of department stores. Raw milk is legally sold in the entire country, and the same goes for raw milk cheeses, which are especially sought out and promoted by the ] and ] movements.<ref></ref> | |||
In the ], the sale and production of raw milk is legal and regulated by the ]. While raw milk was previously banned in Irish law, since 2015, raw milk production has been regulated in accordance with the ''European Communities (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations (2009)''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=S.I. No. 432/2009 – European Communities (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations 2009, Section 32.2 |url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2009/si/432/made/en/print |access-date=25 August 2020 |website=Irish Statute Book |publisher=Irish Government}}</ref> Farmers wishing to produce more than {{convert|30|L}} of raw milk for human consumption are required to register with the department's Milk Hygiene Division and consent to random sampling of their products as well as regular inspections of their production facilities.<ref>{{Cite web |last=DAFM |title=Trader Notice – Testing of Raw Milk for TBC/SCC |url=https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/foodsafetypublichealthampconsumerissues/foodsafetycontrolsonmilk/tradernotices/3MilkCircularTBCSCC160518.pdf |access-date=25 August 2020 |website=Agriculture.gov.ie |publisher=DAFM}}</ref> The sale and consumption of raw milk has been discouraged by various food safety experts, including the Food Safety Authority of Ireland.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Barry |first=Aoife |date=January 13, 2015 |title=Put down that glass of raw milk, say Ireland's food safety experts |url=https://www.thejournal.ie/raw-milk-warning-ireland-1880468-Jan2015/ |access-date=25 August 2020 |publisher=The Journal}}</ref> | |||
==== |
====Nordic states==== | ||
Shops are not permitted to sell unpasteurised milk to consumers in ],<ref> (Norwegian)</ref> ],<ref> (Swedish)</ref> ],<ref> (Swedish)</ref> and ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816003426/https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Stalddoerssalg.aspx |date=2016-08-16 }} (Danish)</ref><ref> (Danish)</ref> All four countries allow limited "barn door" sales subject to strict controls. {{as of|2015}}, just one distributor in Denmark is licensed to supply restaurants with raw milk from approved farms.<ref> (Danish)</ref> Pasteurisation of milk became common practice in Denmark and Sweden in the mid-1880s.<ref></ref> | |||
] | |||
Distribution of raw milk is illegal in ]. While it is legal in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, the only registered producers are in England.<ref>The Association of Unpasteurised Milk Producers and Consumers, Hardwick Estate Office, Whitchurch-on-Thames, Reading RG8 7RB</ref> About 200 producers sell raw, or "green top" milk direct to consumers, either at the farm, at a ], or through a delivery service. The bottle must display the warning "this product has not been heat-treated and may contain organisms harmful to health", and the dairy must conform to higher hygiene standards than dairies producing only pasteurised milk. | |||
====Slovenia==== | |||
As it is only legal to supply unpasteurised milk direct to consumers, it is illegal to be sold on the High Street, via shops or supermarkets. | |||
Raw milk has been available from refrigerated milk vending machines ({{lang|sl|mlekomati}}) all over the country since 2010. The milk sold in the machines is subject to stringent regular control. | |||
{{As of|2018|post=,}} raw milk is also available in shops. The Slovenian National Institute of Public Health advises that consuming fresh milk from a milk machine that is not heat-treated (boiled) can pose a health risk.<ref> ({{in lang|sl}})</ref> | |||
==== Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, ==== | |||
====United Kingdom==== | |||
These countries allow the distribution of unprocessed raw milk. This is mostly done by automatic vending machines known as "Mlekomat". An EU programme supports the farmers with 50% of their investments in vending machines.{{citation needed|date=October 2012}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
About 150 producers of raw milk are listed with the ] in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.<ref></ref> They sell raw, or "green top" milk directly to consumers either at the farm, at a ], or through a delivery service, as it is legal to supply unpasteurized raw milk directly to consumers, but illegal to be sold to a shop. The bottle must display the warning "this product has not been heat-treated and may contain organisms harmful to health", and the milk must conform to higher hygiene standards than dairies producing only pasteurised milk.<ref></ref><ref></ref> | |||
It is an offence to place raw milk or cream on the market for direct consumption in ] following a spate of deaths in 1983.<ref></ref><ref></ref> | |||
===North America=== | ===North America=== | ||
====Canada==== | ====Canada==== | ||
The sale of raw milk directly to consumers |
The sale of raw milk directly to consumers has been prohibited in ]<ref>{{Cite web |date=2005-04-22 |title=Statement from Health Canada About Drinking Raw Milk |url=http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/securit/facts-faits/rawmilk-laitcru_e.html}}</ref> under the ''Food and Drug Regulations'' since 1991. | ||
{{blockquote | |||
{{quote|No person shall sell the normal lacteal secretion obtained from the mammary gland of the cow, genus Bos, or of any other animal, or sell a dairy product made with any such secretion, unless the secretion or dairy product has been pasteurized by being held at a temperature and for a period that ensure the reduction of the alkaline phosphatase activity so as to meet the tolerances specified in official method MFO-3, Determination of Phosphatase Activity in Dairy Products, dated November 30, 1981.|<ref>http://www.ait-aci.ca/oils/june_2010/1-11.pdf</ref>|Section B.08.002.2 (1)}} | |||
|No person shall sell the normal lacteal secretion obtained from the mammary gland of the cow, genus Bos, or of any other animal, or sell a dairy product made with any such secretion, unless the secretion or dairy product has been pasteurized by being held at a temperature and for a period that ensure the reduction of the alkaline phosphatase activity so as to meet the tolerances specified in official method MFO-3, Determination of Phosphatase Activity in Dairy Products, dated November 30, 1981.|Section B.08.002.2 (1)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Agreement on Internal Trade | Eliminate barriers to the free movement of persons, goods, services and investments |url=http://www.ait-aci.ca/oils/june_2010/1-11.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130310022147/http://www.ait-aci.ca/oils/june_2010/1-11.pdf |archive-date=2013-03-10 |access-date=2010-10-30}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
Provincial laws also forbid the sale and distribution of raw milk. |
Provincial laws also forbid the sale and distribution of raw milk. For instance, ]'s Health Protection and Promotion Act, subsection 18(1) reads: "No person shall sell, offer for sale, deliver or distribute milk or cream that has not been pasteurized or sterilized in a plant that is licensed under the Milk Act or in a plant outside Ontario that meets the standards for plants licensed under the Milk Act." | ||
In January 2010, ] was found not guilty on 19 charges relating to the sale of raw milk in the Ontario Court of Justice.<ref name="Schmidtdecision">, R. v. Schmidt 2010 ONCJ 9 CanLII</ref> |
In January 2010, ] was found not guilty on 19 charges relating to the sale of raw milk in the ].<ref name="Schmidtdecision">, R. v. Schmidt 2010 ONCJ 9 CanLII</ref> On appeal to the Ontario Court of Justice, that decision was overturned. Schmidt was convicted on thirteen counts and imposed fines totaling $9,150 and one year of probation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=R. v. Schmidt, 2011 ONCJ 482 |url=http://canlii.ca/t/fn844}}</ref> A subsequent appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal was dismissed.<ref>{{Cite web |title=R. v. Schmidt, 2014 ONCA 188 |url=http://canlii.ca/t/g6456}}</ref> | ||
In ], Alice Jongerden, Michael Schmidt and Gordon Watson—persons involved in the operation of her raw milk dairy—attempted to avoid enforcement of a judgement against them under the Public Health Act by challenging the constitutionality of the legislation, which deems raw milk to be a hazardous product, on the grounds that it violated the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Constitutional challenge made by raw milk farmer |url=http://www.chilliwacktimes.com/health/Constitutional+challenge+made+milk+farmer/4163193/story.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120309183950/http://www.chilliwacktimes.com/health/Constitutional+challenge+made+milk+farmer/4163193/story.html |archive-date=2012-03-09 |access-date=2011-02-16}}</ref> This argument, and other defenses invoked by her and defendants in her business, was rejected in 2013 by the ], which instead found Schmidt and Watson guilty of ], and sentenced them to a 3-month ] imprisonment with a probationary period of 1 year during which "Any repetition of this contempt ... will trigger the imposed sentence imprisonment of 3 months."<ref name="2013BCSC">{{Cite web |title=In The Supreme Court of British Columbia. A. Fraser Health Authority v. Jongerden. 2013 BCSC 986 |url=http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0/0/british-columbia/supreme-court-of-british-columbia/2013/06/2013bcsc986.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160914220625/http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0/0/british-columbia/supreme-court-of-british-columbia/2013/06/2013bcsc986.shtml |archive-date=2016-09-14 |access-date=4 September 2016 |website=Globe 24 h Caselaw}}</ref> They were also charged special costs. | |||
In British Columbia, Alice Jongerden is challenging the constitutionality of that province's legislation, which deems raw milk to be a hazardous product.<ref>http://www.chilliwacktimes.com/health/Constitutional+challenge+made+milk+farmer/4163193/story.html</ref> | |||
Meanwhile, Canada |
Meanwhile, Canada permits the sale of raw milk ] aged over 60 days. In 2009, the province of ] modified regulations to allow raw milk cheeses aged less than 60 days, provided stringent safeguards were met.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130730032839/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/article700358.ece |date=2013-07-30 }}</ref> | ||
====United States==== | ====United States==== | ||
{{Main|United States raw milk debate}} | {{Main|United States raw milk debate}} | ||
[[File:Raw Milk Legality in the USA.svg|250px|thumb|Legality of raw milk per state.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Raw milk law library - Get Raw Milk |url=https://getrawmilk.com/raw-milk-laws}}</ref> | |||
Twenty-eight U.S. states allow sales of raw milk.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ftcldf.org/raw_milk_map.htm |title=State-by-State Review of Raw Milk Laws|author=Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund}}</ref> Cow shares can be found, and raw milk purchased for animal consumption in many states where retail for human consumption is prohibited. | |||
{{legend|#000080|Legal through Retail Sales}} | |||
{{legend|#008080|Legal through Farm Sales}} | |||
{{legend|#008000|Legal through Herdshares}} | |||
{{legend|#800080|Legal for Animal Consumption}} | |||
{{legend|#D45500|Legal for Goat's Milk only}} | |||
{{legend|#AA4400|Legal through Doctor's Approval}} | |||
{{legend|#AA8800|Legal through State Commission}} | |||
{{legend|#800000|Illegal}}]] | |||
In the early 20th century, many states within the ] allowed the sale of raw milk that was certified by a "medical milk commission",<ref>{{Cite book |last=U.S. Department of Agriculture |url=https://archive.org/details/milkcom00usde |title=Medical milk commissions and the production of certified milk in the United States |date=12 September 2018 |publisher=Washington, D.C. : U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry |via=Internet Archive}}</ref> effectively allowing an alternative of extra inspection for pasteurization. Most states impose restrictions on raw milk suppliers due to safety concerns. 43 U.S. states allow the sale of raw milk.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund |title=State-by-State Review of Raw Milk Laws |url=http://www.ftcldf.org/raw_milk_map.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111216034351/http://www.ftcldf.org/raw_milk_map.htm |archive-date=2011-12-16 |access-date=2018-12-29}}</ref> ] can be found, and raw milk purchased for animal consumption in many states where retail for human consumption is prohibited. The sale of raw milk cheese is permitted if the cheese has been aged for 60 days or more.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 2004 |title=Summary of Raw Milk Statutes and Administrative Codes |url=http://www.realmilk.com/state-updates/raw-milk-statutes-and-codes-page-1}}</ref> | |||
Most states impose restrictions on raw milk suppliers due to concerns about safety. As of 2009, the state of Connecticut has discussed creating possible restrictions upon the sale of raw milk to farms and farmer's markets.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2007/01/19/raw_milk/ |title=Raw Milk- Still Controversial?|author=Hannah Wallace}}</ref> | |||
The FDA reports that, in 2002, consuming partially heated raw milk and raw milk products caused 200 Americans to become ill in some manner.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_5_38/ai_n6198587/|title=Got Milk? Make Sure It's Pasteurized|author=Linda Bren|publisher=US Food and Drug Administration | year=2004}}</ref> | |||
The FDA reports that, in 2002, consuming partially heated raw milk and raw milk products caused 200 Americans to become ill in some manner.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Linda Bren |year=2004 |title=Got Milk? Make Sure It's Pasteurized |url=http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps1609/www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2004/504_milk.html |publisher=US Food and Drug Administration}}</ref> | |||
Many governmental officials and the majority of public health organizations hold to the need for pasteurization. Before pasteurization, many dairies, especially in cities, fed their cattle on low-quality food, and their milk was rife with dangerous bacteria. Pasteurizing it was the only way to make it safely drinkable. As pasteurization has been standard for many years, it is now widely assumed that raw milk is dangerous.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lifestyle.msn.com/your-life/living-green/articlegreenchan.aspx?cp-documentid=18708415&page=2|title=Trafficking in Raw Milk|author=Ann Monroe|publisher=MSN Lifestyle}}</ref> The Cornell University Food Science Department has compiled data indicating that pathogenic microorganisms are present in between 0.87% and 12.6% of raw milk samples.<ref></ref> | |||
Many{{who|date=May 2021}} governmental officials and most public health organizations hold to the need for pasteurization. Before pasteurization, many dairies, especially in cities, fed their cattle on low-quality feed, producing milk rife with dangerous bacteria. Pasteurizing it was the only way to make it safely drinkable.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ann Monroe |title=Trafficking in Raw Milk |url=http://lifestyle.msn.com/your-life/living-green/articlegreenchan.aspx?cp-documentid=18708415&page=2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090330035550/http://lifestyle.msn.com/your-life/living-green/articlegreenchan.aspx?cp-documentid=18708415&page=2 |archive-date=2009-03-30 |access-date=2009-04-02 |publisher=MSN Lifestyle}}</ref> The Cornell University Food Science Department has compiled data indicating that pathogenic microorganisms are present in between 0.87% and 12.6% of raw milk samples.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Raw Milk Sales & Consumption – Position Statement |url=http://foodscience.cornell.edu/cals/foodsci/extension/upload/RAW-MILK-MQIP-Position-Statement-01-09.doc}}</ref> | |||
Proponents of raw milk (in the U.S.) advance two basic arguments for unpasteurized milk. They claim that pasteurization destroys or damages some of the milk's nutrients, and that while pasteurization may kill dangerous bacteria, it also kills off good bacteria that raw milk supporters claim to have health benefits.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.realmilk.com/what.html|title=A Campaign for Real Milk/The Weston A. Price Foundation}}</ref> The United States Food and Drug administration claims that this is false, and that pasteurizing milk does not destroy any of its nutritive value.<ref name="fda.gov"/> | |||
Proponents also invoke the benefits of direct-marketing when promoting the sale of raw milk. The ability of the farmer to eliminate |
Proponents also invoke the benefits of direct-marketing when promoting the sale of raw milk. The ability of the farmer to eliminate intermediaries and sell directly to the consumer allows for greater profitability. Many manufacturers sell small-scale pasteurization equipment, allowing farmers to bypass the milk processors and sell pasteurized milk directly to the consumer. Additionally, some small U.S. dairies are now beginning to adopt low-temperature vat pasteurization.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cookson Beecher |date=August 12, 2010 |title=Raw Milk Alternatives |url=http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2010/08/raw-milk-alternatives/}}</ref> Advocates of low-temperature vat pasteurization note that it produces a product similar to raw milk in composition. | ||
Food freedom advocates cite ] arguments in claiming a basic ] of each person to weigh the risks and benefits in ] the food one eats, including the choice to consume raw milk.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mark Nugent |date=July 23, 2013 |title=The Fight for Food Rights (Review of ''Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Food Rights: The Escalating Battle Over Who Decides What We Eat'' by David Gumpert) |url=http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-fight-for-food-rights/ |access-date=September 15, 2013 |work=The American Conservative}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=June 1, 2013 |title=The menace of moo-shine – Saving America from raw milk |url=https://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21578663-saving-america-raw-milk-menace-moo-shine |access-date=September 18, 2013 |newspaper=The Economist}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Soleil Ho |date=March 18, 2010 |title=The Frothy Dream of Raw Milk |url=http://heavytable.com/the-frothy-dream-of-raw-milk// |access-date=September 18, 2013 |work=The Heavy Table}}</ref> | |||
===Oceania=== | ===Oceania=== | ||
====Australia==== | ====Australia==== | ||
] | |||
The sale of raw milk for drinking purposes is illegal in all states and territories in ], as is all raw milk cheese. This has been circumvented somewhat by selling raw milk as ''bath milk''. An exception to the cheese rule has been made recently for two ] cheeses.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/health-mediarel-yr2005-cp-pyn057.htm?OpenDocument&yr=2005&mth=9|title=Roquefort cheese can now be sold in Australia}}</ref> There is some indication of share owning cows, allowing the "owners" to consume the raw milk,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-30/dairy-farmer-using-cow-shares-scheme-to-fight-raw-milk-sales-ban/4722074|title=Farmer uses cow shares scheme to fight raw milk sales ban|publisher=]|date=2013-05-30|accessdate=2013-05-30}}</ref> but also evidence that the government is trying to close this loophole.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.safefood.qld.gov.au/docs/fs%20-%20raw%20milk%20pathogens%20141003.pdf|title=raw milk pathogens}}</ref> | |||
The sale of raw milk for drinking purposes is illegal in all states and territories in ], as is all raw milk cheese. This has been circumvented somewhat by selling raw milk as ''bath milk''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dr John D'Arcy |date=2012-08-12 |title=White lies: The truth about raw milk |url=https://au.news.yahoo.com/sunday-night/features/a/14507855/white-lies-the-truth-about-raw-milk/ |access-date=2014-11-08 |website=Yahoo 7 News}}</ref> An exception to the cheese rule has been made recently for two ] cheeses.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Roquefort cheese can now be sold in Australia |url=http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/health-mediarel-yr2005-cp-pyn057.htm?OpenDocument&yr=2005&mth=9 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130310025545/http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/health-mediarel-yr2005-cp-pyn057.htm?OpenDocument&yr=2005&mth=9 |archive-date=2013-03-10 |access-date=2007-10-23}}</ref> There is some indication of share owning cows, allowing the "owners" to consume the raw milk,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2013-05-30 |title=Farmer uses cow shares scheme to fight raw milk sales ban |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-30/dairy-farmer-using-cow-shares-scheme-to-fight-raw-milk-sales-ban/4722074 |access-date=2013-05-30 |publisher=]}}</ref> but also evidence that the government is trying to close this loophole.<ref>{{Cite web |title=raw milk pathogens |url=http://www.safefood.qld.gov.au/docs/fs%20-%20raw%20milk%20pathogens%20141003.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070831033613/http://www.safefood.qld.gov.au/docs/fs%20-%20raw%20milk%20pathogens%20141003.pdf |archive-date=2007-08-31 |access-date=2007-10-23}}</ref> | |||
On 8 November 2015, four-year-old Apu Khangura died of ], and seven other children became seriously ill following the consumption of raw milk. In response, the ]n government created new regulations that require producers to treat raw milk to reduce pathogens or to make the product unpalatable to taste, such as making it bitter.<ref name="The Age">{{Cite news |date=28 December 2014 |title=Victoria to introduce tough raw milk laws |url=http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/victoria-to-introduce-tough-raw-milk-laws-20141228-12ekvl.html |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=28 December 2014 |title=Victoria launches crackdown on sale of 'raw' unpasteurised milk |url=https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2014/dec/28/victoria-launches-crackdown-on-sale-of-raw-unpasteurised-milk |work=The Guardian}}</ref> | |||
====New Zealand==== | ====New Zealand==== | ||
Raw milk products can be made and sold in ] |
Raw milk for drinking and raw milk products can be made and sold in ] but are highly regulated to offset the pathogen risk. Producers of raw milk for sale to consumers must be registered. Raw milk must either be collected by the purchaser from the producer's farm or delivered to the purchaser's home.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Raw milk regulations |url=https://www.mpi.govt.nz/food-safety/food-safety-for-consumers/is-it-safe-to-eat/raw-milk/raw-milk-regulations/ |access-date=29 August 2017 |publisher=]}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* |
* ] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist |
{{Reflist}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{Commons cat}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | * (CDC) | ||
* (FDA) | |||
* Florida Department of Health | |||
* {{Skeptoid |id=4383 |number=383 |title=5 False Arguments for Raw Milk |date=October 8, 2013 }} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Milk navbox}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Raw Milk}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Raw Milk}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:34, 28 December 2024
Milk that has not been pasteurizedRaw milk or unpasteurized milk is milk that has not undergone pasteurization, a process of heating liquid foods to kill pathogens for safe consumption and extension of shelf life.
Proponents of raw milk have asserted numerous supposed benefits to consumption, including better flavor, better nutrition, contributions to the building of a healthy immune system and protection from allergies. However, no clear benefit to consumption has been found; the medical community notes there is increased risk of contracting dangerous milk borne diseases from these products. Substantial evidence of this increased risk, combined with a lack of any clear benefit, has led countries around the world to either prohibit the sale of raw milk or require warning labels on packaging when sold.
In countries where it is available for sale, its availability and regulations around its sale vary. In the European Union, individual member states can prohibit or restrict the sale of raw milk, but it is not banned outright; in some member states, the sale of raw milk through vending machines is permitted, though the packaging will typically instruct consumers to boil before consumption. In the United States, some dairies have adopted low-temperature vat pasteurization, which they say produces a product similar to raw milk.
History of raw milk and pasteurization
Humans first learned to regularly consume the milk of other mammals following the domestication of animals during the Neolithic Revolution or the development of agriculture. This development occurred independently in several places around the world from as early as 9000–7000 BC in Mesopotamia to 3500–3000 BC in the Americas. The most important dairy animals—cattle, sheep and goats—were first domesticated in Mesopotamia, although domestic cattle had been independently derived from wild aurochs populations several times since. From there dairy animals spread to Europe (beginning around 7000 BC but not reaching Britain and Scandinavia until after 4000 BC), and South Asia (7000–5500 BC).
Pasteurization is widely used to prevent infected milk from entering the food supply. The pasteurization process was developed in 1864 by French scientist Louis Pasteur, who discovered that heating beer and wine was enough to kill most of the microorganisms that caused spoilage, preventing these beverages from turning sour. The process achieves this by eliminating pathogenic microbes and lowering microbial numbers to prolong the shelf life of the beverage.
After sufficient scientific study led to the development of germ theory, pasteurization was introduced in the United States in the 1890s. This move successfully controlled the spread of highly contagious bacterial diseases, including E. coli, bovine tuberculosis, and brucellosis (all thought to be easily transmitted to humans through the drinking of raw milk). In the early days after the scientific discovery of bacteria, there was no product testing to determine whether a farmer's milk was safe or infected, so all milk was treated as potentially contagious. After the first tests were developed, some farmers took steps to prevent their infected animals from being killed and removed from food production, sometimes even falsifying test results to make their animals appear free of infection. Recent advances in the analysis of milk-borne diseases have enabled scientists to track the DNA of the infectious bacteria to the cows on the farms that supplied the raw milk.
The recognition of many potentially deadly pathogens, such as E. coli 0157 H7, Campylobacter, Listeria, and Salmonella, and their possible presence in poorly produced milk products has led to the continuation of pasteurization. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other health agencies of the United States strongly recommend that the public not consume raw milk or raw milk products. Young children, the elderly, people with weakened immune systems, and pregnant women are more susceptible to infections originating in raw milk.
Uses
Some cheeses are produced with raw milk, although local statutes vary regarding what health precautions must be followed, such as aging cheese for a certain amount of time. A large proportion of the US population eats several different kinds of cheese made with raw milk, including aged Gouda cheese.
The first camembert was made from raw milk, and the Appellation d'origine contrôlée (AOC) variety "Camembert de Normandie" (approximately 10% of all camembert production) is required by law to be made only with unpasteurized milk. Many modern cheesemakers, however, use pasteurized milk for safety, compliance with regulations, or convenience.
A thick mixture known as syllabub was created by milkmaids squirting milk directly from a cow into a container of cider, beer or other beverage.
Raw yak milk can ferment overnight to become yak butter.
Health effects
Infectivity
The potential pathogenic bacteria from raw milk include tuberculosis, diphtheria, typhoid, Campylobacter, Listeria, Brucella, E. coli, Salmonella, and streptococcal infections and make it potentially unsafe to consume. Moreover, a review published in 2012 by the Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain alongside experts from several Belgian universities and institutions concluded that "raw milk poses a realistic health threat due to a possible contamination with human pathogens. It is therefore strongly recommended that milk should be heated before consumption."
Even with precautions and cold storage (optimally 3–4 °C or 37–39 °F), raw milk has a shelf life of 3 to 5 days.
A 2024 study showed that Influenza A virus can survive in refrigerated raw milk for several days.
The 2020–2024 H5N1 outbreak spread to dairy cattle in 2024, and influenza was detected in commercial milk supplies in the United States. The United States Food and Drug Administration warned (as has been its long-standing position) that consumers should avoid raw milk because its ability to transmit influenza to humans is unknown, but pasteurization is believed to inactivate the virus. A high mortality rate was observed among cats that drank raw milk from cows displaying symptoms of H5N1 infection.
Epidemiology
Before pasteurized milk was adopted in the US, public health officials were concerned with cow milk transmission of bovine tuberculosis to humans, with an estimated 10% of all tuberculosis cases in humans being attributed to milk consumption. Along with specific diseases, officials continue to be concerned about outbreaks. With modern pasteurization and sanitation practices, milk accounts for less than 1% of reported outbreaks caused by food and water consumption. By comparison, raw milk was associated with 25% of all disease outbreaks from food/water during the time before World War II in the U.S. From a public health standpoint, pasteurization has decreased the percentage of milk associated food/water borne outbreaks.
Between 2007 and 2016, there were 144 outbreaks connected to raw milk consumption in the United States. Because raw milk production skips the pasteurization process, the germs that are normally removed remain in the milk product. Exposure to raw milk containing harmful germs threatens infection, resulting from bacteria including Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, E. coli, Listeria, and Salmonella. Additionally, depending on the severity of the infection, there may be further threats to human health. Infection has the potential to induce serious illnesses such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). Because of the vulnerability of developing and degrading immune systems, children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those who are immunocompromised are at a heightened risk of experiencing infection from raw milk consumption.
Outbreaks have occurred from consuming food products made with raw milk. One of the potential pathogens in raw milk, Listeria monocytogenes, can survive the pasteurization process and contaminate post-pasteurization environments. Milk and dairy products made with that milk then become recontaminated. Consistent contamination persists by bacteria survival in biofilms within the processing systems.
One food item that has commonly used raw milk in its production in the past is cheese. Several different types of cheeses made with raw milk are consumed by a large portion of the United States population, including soft cheeses. Since Gouda cheese has a 60-day aging period before its consumption, it has previously been hypothesized that no bacteria would persist through that time. A review study published in the Journal of Food Protection showed that E. coli 0157:H7 can persist through the aging period of Gouda cheese. The study's evidence included three outbreaks before 2013 associated with this specific strain of E. coli in Gouda.
Nutrition and allergy
"With the exception of an altered organoleptic profile, heating (particularly ultra-high temperature and similar treatments) will not substantially change the nutritional value of raw milk or other benefits associated with raw milk consumption."
Raw milk advocates, such as the Weston A. Price Foundation, say that raw milk can be produced hygienically and that it has health benefits that are destroyed in the pasteurization process. Research shows only very slight differences in the nutritional values of pasteurized and unpasteurized milk.
Proponents of raw milk in the US typically argue that while pasteurization may kill dangerous bacteria, it also kills off good bacteria claimed to have health benefits not present in pasteurized milk. The United States Food and Drug Administration has stated that this is false, and that pasteurizing milk does not destroy any of its nutritional value.
One study used mice to evaluate the difference in nutritional values between raw and pasteurized milk. Mice were separated into two groups: a pasteurized milk group and a raw milk group. Each group consisted of breeding pairs. The study's conclusion measured no significant difference in pasteurized to raw milk-consuming mice weights. Birth weights were measured from each group, and no significant differences were observed. Overall, the study showed no significant measurable difference in nutritional value in the growth and fertility of mice.
Three studies have found an inverse relationship between consumption of raw milk and asthma and allergies. However, all of these studies have been performed in children living on farms and living a farming lifestyle, rather than comparing urban children living typical urban lifestyles and with typical urban exposures based on consumption or nonconsumption of raw milk. Aspects of the overall urban vs. farming environment lifestyle have been suggested as having a role in these differences. For this reason, the overall phenomenon has been named the "farm effect". A recent scientific review concluded that "most studies alluding to a possible protective effect of raw milk consumption do not contain any objective confirmation of the raw milk's status or a direct comparison with heat-treated milk. Moreover, it seems that the observed increased resistance seems to be rather related to the exposure to a farm environment or to animals than to raw milk consumption." For example, in the largest of these studies, exposure to cows and straw as well as raw milk were associated with lower rates of asthma and exposure to animal feed storage rooms and manure with lower rates of atopic dermatitis; "the effect on hay fever and atopic sensitization could not be completely explained by the questionnaire items themselves or their diversity."
Legal status
Regulation of the commercial distribution of packaged raw milk varies around the world. Some countries have complete bans, but many do not restrict the purchase of raw milk directly from the farmer. Raw milk is sometimes distributed through a program in which the consumer owns a share in the dairy animal or the herd and, therefore, can be considered to be consuming milk from their own animal, which is legal. Raw milk is sometimes marketed for animal or pet consumption or for other uses such as soap making in places where sales for human consumption are prohibited.
Africa
Although milk consumption in Africa is fairly low compared to the rest of the world, in tribes where milk consumption is popular, such as the Maasai tribe, milk is typically consumed unpasteurized.
Asia
In rural areas of Asia, where milk consumption is popular, milk is typically unpasteurized. In large Asian cities, raw milk is typical, especially from water buffalo. In most countries of Asia, laws prohibiting raw milk are nonexistent or rarely enforced. Milk labeled as "raw" (nama) is available in Japan. Still, the designation means it is 100% raw whole milk before being pasteurized. Unpasteurized milk is very uncommon in Japan. In Singapore, the sale of raw milk for human consumption is prohibited due to safety concerns outlined by the Singapore Food Agency.
In India, milk is often drunk raw, although milk supplied in major cities is sometimes pasteurized. Pasteurized or not, milk is often boiled in homes before consumption.
Europe
In the European Union, raw milk and products made with raw milk must be labeled to indicate this. Under EU hygiene rules, member states can prohibit or restrict the placing on the market of raw milk intended for human consumption. Individual member states can also implement stricter requirements. Usually, special sanitary regulations and frequent quality tests (at least once per month) are mandatory.
France
Raw milk cheeses make up about 18 percent of France's total cheese production and are considered far superior to cheeses made from pasteurized milk. Many French cuisine traditionalists consider pasteurized cheeses almost a sacrilege. Many traditional French cheeses have solely been made from raw milk for hundreds of years. Unpasteurised cheese in France is the major source of staphylococcal food poisoning.
Germany
In Germany, packaged raw milk may be sold in shops under the name Vorzugsmilch. The raw milk has to be packed before vending, with the necessary information (producer, shelf life, and special warnings) written on the product. The distribution license has stringent quality restrictions; as of 2012, just 80 farmers in Germany had a license.
Unpackaged raw milk may only be sold under specific conditions. It must:
- only be sold at the farm where it was produced
- be from the day of or the day before production
- have a warning label "Raw Milk – boil before use"
Ireland
In the Republic of Ireland, the sale and production of raw milk is legal and regulated by the Department of Agriculture. While raw milk was previously banned in Irish law, since 2015, raw milk production has been regulated in accordance with the European Communities (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations (2009). Farmers wishing to produce more than 30 litres (6.6 imp gal; 7.9 US gal) of raw milk for human consumption are required to register with the department's Milk Hygiene Division and consent to random sampling of their products as well as regular inspections of their production facilities. The sale and consumption of raw milk has been discouraged by various food safety experts, including the Food Safety Authority of Ireland.
Nordic states
Shops are not permitted to sell unpasteurised milk to consumers in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. All four countries allow limited "barn door" sales subject to strict controls. As of 2015, just one distributor in Denmark is licensed to supply restaurants with raw milk from approved farms. Pasteurisation of milk became common practice in Denmark and Sweden in the mid-1880s.
Slovenia
Raw milk has been available from refrigerated milk vending machines (mlekomati) all over the country since 2010. The milk sold in the machines is subject to stringent regular control.
As of 2018, raw milk is also available in shops. The Slovenian National Institute of Public Health advises that consuming fresh milk from a milk machine that is not heat-treated (boiled) can pose a health risk.
United Kingdom
About 150 producers of raw milk are listed with the Food Standards Agency in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. They sell raw, or "green top" milk directly to consumers either at the farm, at a farmers' market, or through a delivery service, as it is legal to supply unpasteurized raw milk directly to consumers, but illegal to be sold to a shop. The bottle must display the warning "this product has not been heat-treated and may contain organisms harmful to health", and the milk must conform to higher hygiene standards than dairies producing only pasteurised milk.
It is an offence to place raw milk or cream on the market for direct consumption in Scotland following a spate of deaths in 1983.
North America
Canada
The sale of raw milk directly to consumers has been prohibited in Canada under the Food and Drug Regulations since 1991.
No person shall sell the normal lacteal secretion obtained from the mammary gland of the cow, genus Bos, or of any other animal, or sell a dairy product made with any such secretion, unless the secretion or dairy product has been pasteurized by being held at a temperature and for a period that ensure the reduction of the alkaline phosphatase activity so as to meet the tolerances specified in official method MFO-3, Determination of Phosphatase Activity in Dairy Products, dated November 30, 1981.
— Section B.08.002.2 (1)
Provincial laws also forbid the sale and distribution of raw milk. For instance, Ontario's Health Protection and Promotion Act, subsection 18(1) reads: "No person shall sell, offer for sale, deliver or distribute milk or cream that has not been pasteurized or sterilized in a plant that is licensed under the Milk Act or in a plant outside Ontario that meets the standards for plants licensed under the Milk Act."
In January 2010, Michael Schmidt was found not guilty on 19 charges relating to the sale of raw milk in the Ontario Court of Justice. On appeal to the Ontario Court of Justice, that decision was overturned. Schmidt was convicted on thirteen counts and imposed fines totaling $9,150 and one year of probation. A subsequent appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal was dismissed.
In British Columbia, Alice Jongerden, Michael Schmidt and Gordon Watson—persons involved in the operation of her raw milk dairy—attempted to avoid enforcement of a judgement against them under the Public Health Act by challenging the constitutionality of the legislation, which deems raw milk to be a hazardous product, on the grounds that it violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This argument, and other defenses invoked by her and defendants in her business, was rejected in 2013 by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, which instead found Schmidt and Watson guilty of civil contempt, and sentenced them to a 3-month suspended sentence imprisonment with a probationary period of 1 year during which "Any repetition of this contempt ... will trigger the imposed sentence imprisonment of 3 months." They were also charged special costs.
Meanwhile, Canada permits the sale of raw milk cheese aged over 60 days. In 2009, the province of Quebec modified regulations to allow raw milk cheeses aged less than 60 days, provided stringent safeguards were met.
United States
Main article: United States raw milk debateIn the early 20th century, many states within the United States allowed the sale of raw milk that was certified by a "medical milk commission", effectively allowing an alternative of extra inspection for pasteurization. Most states impose restrictions on raw milk suppliers due to safety concerns. 43 U.S. states allow the sale of raw milk. Cow shares can be found, and raw milk purchased for animal consumption in many states where retail for human consumption is prohibited. The sale of raw milk cheese is permitted if the cheese has been aged for 60 days or more.
The FDA reports that, in 2002, consuming partially heated raw milk and raw milk products caused 200 Americans to become ill in some manner.
Many governmental officials and most public health organizations hold to the need for pasteurization. Before pasteurization, many dairies, especially in cities, fed their cattle on low-quality feed, producing milk rife with dangerous bacteria. Pasteurizing it was the only way to make it safely drinkable. The Cornell University Food Science Department has compiled data indicating that pathogenic microorganisms are present in between 0.87% and 12.6% of raw milk samples.
Proponents also invoke the benefits of direct-marketing when promoting the sale of raw milk. The ability of the farmer to eliminate intermediaries and sell directly to the consumer allows for greater profitability. Many manufacturers sell small-scale pasteurization equipment, allowing farmers to bypass the milk processors and sell pasteurized milk directly to the consumer. Additionally, some small U.S. dairies are now beginning to adopt low-temperature vat pasteurization. Advocates of low-temperature vat pasteurization note that it produces a product similar to raw milk in composition.
Food freedom advocates cite libertarian arguments in claiming a basic civil right of each person to weigh the risks and benefits in choosing the food one eats, including the choice to consume raw milk.
Oceania
Australia
The sale of raw milk for drinking purposes is illegal in all states and territories in Australia, as is all raw milk cheese. This has been circumvented somewhat by selling raw milk as bath milk. An exception to the cheese rule has been made recently for two Roquefort cheeses. There is some indication of share owning cows, allowing the "owners" to consume the raw milk, but also evidence that the government is trying to close this loophole.
On 8 November 2015, four-year-old Apu Khangura died of hemolytic–uremic syndrome, and seven other children became seriously ill following the consumption of raw milk. In response, the Victorian government created new regulations that require producers to treat raw milk to reduce pathogens or to make the product unpalatable to taste, such as making it bitter.
New Zealand
Raw milk for drinking and raw milk products can be made and sold in New Zealand but are highly regulated to offset the pathogen risk. Producers of raw milk for sale to consumers must be registered. Raw milk must either be collected by the purchaser from the producer's farm or delivered to the purchaser's home.
See also
References
- Beecher, Cookson (12 January 2016). "Raw milk's 'explosive growth' comes with costs to the state". Food Safety News. Seattle. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
- Sozańska, Barbara (22 February 2019). "Raw Cow's Milk and Its Protective Effect on Allergies and Asthma". Nutrients. 11 (2): 469. doi:10.3390/nu11020469. PMC 6413174. PMID 30813365.
- ^ Smith, Terri Peterson (31 August 2010). "Got E. coli? Raw Milk's Appeal Grows Despite Health Risks". Scientific American.
- "Raw drinking milk: what are the risks?". www.efsa.europa.eu. 13 January 2015. Retrieved 2021-10-26.
- Bellwood, Peter (2005). "The Beginnings of Agriculture in Southwest Asia". First Farmers: the origins of agricultural societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 44–68. ISBN 978-0-631-20566-1.
- Bellwood, Peter (2005). "Early Agriculture in the Americas". First Farmers: the origins of agricultural societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 146–79. ISBN 978-0-631-20566-1.
- Beja-Pereira, A.; Caramelli, D.; Lalueza-Fox, C.; Vernesi, C.; Ferrand, N.; Casoli, A.; Goyache, F.; Royo, L. J.; Conti, S.; Lari, M.; Martini, A.; Ouragh, L.; Magid, A.; Atash, A.; Zsolnai, A.; Boscato, P.; Triantaphylidis, C.; Ploumi, K.; Sineo, L.; Mallegni, F.; Taberlet, P.; Erhardt, G.; Sampietro, L.; Bertranpetit, J.; Barbujani, G.; Luikart, G.; Bertorelle, G. (2006). "The origin of European cattle: Evidence from modern and ancient DNA". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (21): 8113–18. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.8113B. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509210103. PMC 1472438. PMID 16690747.
- Price, T. D. (2000). "Europe's first farmers: an introduction". In T. D. Price (ed.). Europe's First Farmers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–18. ISBN 978-0-521-66203-1.
- Meadow, R. H. (1996). "The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in northwestern South Asia". In D. R. Harris (ed.). The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. London: UCL Press. pp. 390–412. ISBN 978-1-85728-538-3.
- Olmstead, Alan L.; Rhode, Paul W. (2004). "An Impossible Undertaking: The Eradication of Bovine Tuberculosis in the United States". The Journal of Economic History. 64 (3): 734–72. doi:10.1017/S0022050704002955.
- Olmstead, Alan L.; Rhode, Paul W. (2007). "Not on My Farm!: Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication in the United States". The Journal of Economic History. 67 (3): 768–809. doi:10.1017/S0022050707000307.
- Blum, Deborah (19 July 2010). "The Raw-Milk Deal". Slate.
- ^ Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied (12 August 2021). "Consumers – The Dangers of Raw Milk: Unpasteurized Milk Can Pose a Serious Health Risk". www.fda.gov.
- "Raw Milk and Cheeses: Health Risks are Still Black and White". Archived from the original on 2011-10-30. Retrieved 2018-12-29.
- "Raw milk". Food Safety News. 15 February 2024.
- Smith, Tim (2005). Making artisan cheese: 50 fine cheeses that you can make in your own kitchen. Beverly, Massachusetts: Quarry Books. ISBN 1-59253-197-0.
- "The Experienced English Housekeeper, 1769".
- "Syllabub". 26 July 2005.
- "Raw Milk". cdc.gov. (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017-06-08. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- "FDA and CDC Remind Consumers of the Dangers of Drinking Raw Milk". US FDA. March 1, 2007. Retrieved 2009-06-05.
- ^ "The Dangers of Raw Milk: Unpasteurized Milk Can Pose a Serious Health Risk". fda.gov. (US) Food and Drug Administration. 12 August 2021.
- ^ Claeys, Wendy L.; Sabine Cardoen; Georges Daube; Jan De Block; Koen Dewettinck; Katelijne Dierick; Lieven De Zutter; André Huyghebaert; Hein Imberechts; Pierre Thiange; Yvan Vandenplas; Lieve Herman (May 2013). "Raw or heated cow milk consumption: Review of risks and benefits". Food Control. 31 (1): 251–62. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.09.035.
- p. 17 in: Isao Yumoto (2013). Cold-Adapted Microorganisms. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1908230904.
- Cindu Annand, David Grewell, Stephanie Clark. "Impact of Batch Thermosonication on Plasmin Activity in Stored Skim Milk: Time-amplitude Effects". Ultrasonics Industry Association (UIA). Retrieved 2019-03-27.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Zulli, Alessandro; Zhang, Mengyang; Jong, Sehee; Blish, Catherine; Boehm, Alexandria B. (2024-12-12). "Infectivity and Persistence of Influenza A Virus in Raw Milk". Environmental Science & Technology Letters. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00971.
- Pien Huang; Chiara Eisner (May 15, 2024). "A bird flu outbreak among dairy cows sparks new warnings about unpasteurized milk". NPR.
- Burrough, Eric; Magstadt, Drew; Main, Rodger (29 April 2024). "Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b Virus Infection in Domestic Dairy Cattle and Cats, United States, 2024". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 30 (7): 1335–1343. doi:10.3201/eid3007.240508. PMC 11210653. PMID 38683888. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
- "More than half of cats died after drinking raw milk from bird flu-infected cows - CBS News". www.cbsnews.com. 2024-04-30. Retrieved 2024-05-01.
- ^ Lucey, John (July–August 2015). "Raw Milk Consumption: Risks and Benefits". Nutrition and Food Science. 50 (4): 189–93. doi:10.1097/NT.0000000000000108. PMC 4890836. PMID 27340300.
- ^ CDC (2018-02-20). "Raw (Unpasteurized) Milk". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2018-12-05.
- Oliver, S.P.; Jayarao, B.M.; Almeida, R.A. (2005). "Foodborne Pathogens in Milk and the Dairy Farm Environment: Food Safety and Public Health Implications". Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2 (2): 115–29. doi:10.1089/fpd.2005.2.115. PMID 15992306.
- Currie, A. (2018). "Outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 Infections Linked to Aged Raw Milk Gouda Cheese". Journal of Food Protection. 81 (2): 325–31. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-283. PMID 29369688.
- "A Campaign for Real Milk/The Weston A. Price Foundation". January 2000.
- Sholing, Kari; Ganong, Lindsay; Olson, Amy (2011). "What are the Effects of Raw vs. Pasteurized Milk Consumption on Growth Rate and Fertility in a Colony of Mice?". Nutrition Student Work (2).
- Perkin MR, Strachan DP (June 2006). "Which aspects of the farming lifestyle explain the inverse association with childhood allergy?". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117 (6): 1374–81. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2006.03.008. PMID 16751000.
- Waser M, Michels KB, Bieli C, et al. (May 2007). "Inverse association of farm milk consumption with asthma and allergy in rural and suburban populations across Europe". Clin. Exp. Allergy. 37 (5): 661–70. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02640.x. PMID 17456213.
- Loss, G; Apprich, S; Waser, M; Kneifel, W; Genuneit, J; Büchele, G; Weber, J; Sozanska, B; Danielewicz, H; Horak, E; van Neerven, RJ; Heederik, D; Lorenzen, PC; von Mutius, E; Braun-Fahrländer, C (2011). "The protective effect of farm milk consumption on childhood asthma and atopy: the GABRIELA study". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 128 (4): 766–73. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.048. hdl:1874/407013. PMID 21875744.
- ^ Illi S, Depner M, Genuneit J, Horak E, Loss G, Strunz-Lehner C, Büchele G, Boznanski A, Danielewicz H, Cullinan P, Heederik D, Braun-Fahrländer C, von Mutius E, GABRIELA Study Group (June 2012). "Protection from childhood asthma and allergy in Alpine farm environments – the GABRIEL Advanced Studies". J Allergy Clin Immunol. 129 (6): 1470–77. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.013. hdl:1874/272655. PMID 22534534.
- Drew Falkenstein (November 12, 2009). "Cow Share Agreements: Fooling Nobody". Food Safety News.
- Okinawa Hai. Buying milk in Okinawa.
- Expat Living. Which milk – and why?
- "Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin" (PDF). 25 June 2004. Retrieved 14 September 2015.
In addition to the requirements of Directive 2000/13/EC, except in the cases envisaged in Article 13(4) and (5) of that Directive, labelling must clearly show: (a) in the case of raw milk intended for direct human consumption, the words 'raw milk'; (b) in the case of products made with raw milk, the manufacturing process for which does not include any heat treatment or any physical or chemical treatment, the words 'made with raw milk'.
- European Food Safety Authority: Raw drinking milk: what are the risks?
- "EU Food Laws (Frame)". www.reading.ac.uk.
- Nytimes.com: The French Resist Again: This Time, Over Cheese
- "Cheese etiquette; discovering cheese; wine and cheese; raw milk; fromages français". www.understandfrance.org.
- Jodi A. Lindsay. Genomics of Staphylococcus pp. 237–65 in Genomics of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Editors: Martin Wiedmann, Wei Zhang. Springer, 2011. ISBN 978-1441976857. p. 242
- Mody RK and Griffin PM. Foodborne Illness. Chapter 103 in Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases: Expert Consult Premium Edition. Editors John E. Bennett, Raphael Dolin, and Martin J. Blaser. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014 ISBN 978-1455748013. p. 1289
- Information about raw milk production by the German raw milk industry (no English version available) Archived 2011-07-19 at the Wayback Machine
- "Erzeugerbetriebe - Bundesverband der Vorzugsmilcherzeuger und Direktvermarkter von Milch und Milchprodukten". Archived from the original on 2016-03-07. Retrieved 2012-09-15.
- "S.I. No. 432/2009 – European Communities (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations 2009, Section 32.2". Irish Statute Book. Irish Government. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
- DAFM. "Trader Notice – Testing of Raw Milk for TBC/SCC" (PDF). Agriculture.gov.ie. DAFM. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
- Barry, Aoife (January 13, 2015). "Put down that glass of raw milk, say Ireland's food safety experts". The Journal. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
- Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Norwegian)
- National Food Agency, Sweden (Swedish)
- Finnish Food Safety Authority (Swedish)
- Danish Veterinary and Food Administration Archived 2016-08-16 at the Wayback Machine (Danish)
- Foodculture.dk: EU advarer mod råmælksdille (Danish)
- Foodculture.dk: Råmælk er et stort hit hos topkokke (Danish)
- Holsinger, Rajkowski & Stabel (1997) Milk pasteurisation and safety: a brief history and update
- Slovenian National Institute of Public Health. Mleko in mlekomati. ((in Slovene))
- Food Standards Agency. Raw Drinking Milk Premises in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
- BBC. Is raw milk a superfood or dangerous fad?
- Gov.uk. Food and drink warnings.
- Food Standards Scotland. Dairy Guidance - Raw Milk
- Sundaypost.com: Health fears over comeback of ‘dirty milk’.
- "Statement from Health Canada About Drinking Raw Milk". 2005-04-22.
- "Agreement on Internal Trade | Eliminate barriers to the free movement of persons, goods, services and investments" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-03-10. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- Health Protection and Promotion Act, R.S.O. 1990, C. H.7, Sections 18(1), 18(2) and 100 (1) Milk Act, R.S.O. 1990, R. v. Schmidt 2010 ONCJ 9 CanLII
- "R. v. Schmidt, 2011 ONCJ 482".
- "R. v. Schmidt, 2014 ONCA 188".
- "Constitutional challenge made by raw milk farmer". Archived from the original on 2012-03-09. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- "In The Supreme Court of British Columbia. A. Fraser Health Authority v. Jongerden. 2013 BCSC 986". Globe 24 h Caselaw. Archived from the original on 2016-09-14. Retrieved 4 September 2016.
- Quebec to allow raw-milk cheeses Archived 2013-07-30 at the Wayback Machine
- "Raw milk law library - Get Raw Milk".
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (12 September 2018). Medical milk commissions and the production of certified milk in the United States. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry – via Internet Archive.
- Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund. "State-by-State Review of Raw Milk Laws". Archived from the original on 2011-12-16. Retrieved 2018-12-29.
- "Summary of Raw Milk Statutes and Administrative Codes". December 2004.
- Linda Bren (2004). "Got Milk? Make Sure It's Pasteurized". US Food and Drug Administration.
- Ann Monroe. "Trafficking in Raw Milk". MSN Lifestyle. Archived from the original on 2009-03-30. Retrieved 2009-04-02.
- "Raw Milk Sales & Consumption – Position Statement".
- Cookson Beecher (August 12, 2010). "Raw Milk Alternatives".
- Mark Nugent (July 23, 2013). "The Fight for Food Rights (Review of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Food Rights: The Escalating Battle Over Who Decides What We Eat by David Gumpert)". The American Conservative. Retrieved September 15, 2013.
- "The menace of moo-shine – Saving America from raw milk". The Economist. June 1, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2013.
- Soleil Ho (March 18, 2010). "The Frothy Dream of Raw Milk". The Heavy Table. Retrieved September 18, 2013.
- Dr John D'Arcy (2012-08-12). "White lies: The truth about raw milk". Yahoo 7 News. Retrieved 2014-11-08.
- "Roquefort cheese can now be sold in Australia". Archived from the original on 2013-03-10. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
- "Farmer uses cow shares scheme to fight raw milk sales ban". ABC Online. 2013-05-30. Retrieved 2013-05-30.
- "raw milk pathogens" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-08-31. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
- "Victoria to introduce tough raw milk laws". The Age. 28 December 2014.
- "Victoria launches crackdown on sale of 'raw' unpasteurised milk". The Guardian. 28 December 2014.
- "Raw milk regulations". Ministry for Primary Industries. Retrieved 29 August 2017.
External links
- Health Risks are Still Black and White (CDC)
- The Dangers of Raw Milk (FDA)
- Dunning, Brian (October 8, 2013). "Skeptoid #383: 5 False Arguments for Raw Milk". Skeptoid.
Milk | ||
---|---|---|
Source | ||
Types | ||
Products | ||
Containers | ||
Topics | ||