Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Gender apartheid: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:05, 1 June 2006 editRenyD (talk | contribs)11 edits →[]: spelling← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:46, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(50 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''no consensus'''. ] 07:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
Non-notable term and a POV-fork of ]. It is interesting to observe that contrary to ]'s view that "sexual apartheid" refers to LGBT issues, while "gender apartheid" refers to discrimination of women, the sources do not support it. For example, this ''Washington Post'' article refers to discrimination of women in Saudi Arabia as "sexual apartheid". In a nutshell, we have no reliable sources discussing the term and confirming its notability. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Non-notable term and a POV-fork of ]. It is interesting to observe that contrary to ]'s view that "sexual apartheid" refers to LGBT issues, while "gender apartheid" refers to discrimination of women, the sources do not support it. For example, this ''Washington Post'' article refers to discrimination of women in Saudi Arabia as "sexual apartheid". In a nutshell, we have no reliable sources discussing the term and confirming its notability. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
{{Seealso|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sexual apartheid}}
⚫ *'''Delete''' as nom. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) (Vote by nominator, should only be counted once)

⚫ *'''Delete''' as nom. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
**'''Double vote''' Pecher is also the nominator so his "vote" should not be counted a second time.] 20:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
***First, please sign your comments; secondly, it's not a double vote, but an accepted way of showing the nominator's vote to facilitate counting. Closing admins are smart enough to figure that I'm the nominator, especially because I state it in the comment. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
****It's misleading. Closing admins know enough to start off by counting the nominator as a "delete".] 20:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
***** Closing admins know enough how to count. Either way is fine. Stop the petty silliness. --] 15:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
******Technically, shouldn't closing admins know '''not''' to count, and close by consensus?--] 04:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Crap article by a user (who has been blocked from editing multiple times) trying to prove a ]. -- ] 15:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Crap article by a user (who has been blocked from editing multiple times) trying to prove a ]. -- ] 15:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- ] | ] 15:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete'''. HOTR obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- ] | ] 15:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Transwiki''' to Wiktionary? <span style="text-decoration: none;">]]] ]</span> 16:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC) * '''Transwiki''' to Wiktionary? <span style="text-decoration: none;">]]] ]</span> 16:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - term is used widely, see external links. Mover is presenting AFD to try to prove a point since he doesn't like the phrase ]. Article refers to both gender apartheid and sexual apartheid as synonyms but attempts to disambiguate between two differing meanings of the phrase "sexual apartheid". I would support moving this article to ] (in order to disambig from the LGBT meaning) if that will satisfy Pecher as per hiw Washington Post citation.] 16:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - term is used widely, see external links. Mover is presenting AFD to try to prove a point since he doesn't like the phrase ]. Article refers to both gender apartheid and sexual apartheid as synonyms but attempts to disambiguate between two differing meanings of the phrase "sexual apartheid". I would support moving this article to ] (in order to disambig from the LGBT meaning) if that will satisfy Pecher as per hiw Washington Post citation.] 16:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 17:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per above. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - same as ] ] 17:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - same as ] ] 17:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
::By that argument the plight of women in Saudi Arabia today is no different from, say, that of women in the US in the 1950s. ] 17:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC) ::By that argument the plight of women in Saudi Arabia today is no different from, say, that of women in the US in the 1950s. ] 17:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
:::Indeed, both are forms of ] ] 18:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
::::Simplistic. ] 18:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
::::Did you seriously attempt to compare the plight of women in the two countries across two different time periods? That's absurd. There's a sea of socio-policitical and even religious and economic differences in between the two. They're not comparable. --] 19:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' I believe a case can be made for the term to be notable, however, I believe this article should be deleted because it's probable that it violates ]. That doesn't mean that the article shouldn't be cleaned up so that it established notability especially since I also feel that other editors may be close to violating ] in order to attack Homey and Homey's article creations. --] 18:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. per above --] | ] 19:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' - article created as part of a scheme to make a ] - disruptive. ] 20:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' as above ] 01:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to ] sounds good to me. Wikt is where dictdefs go. ] 02:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' <span style="border: 1px solid #000000; text-align:center; background: #FFFFFF">&rarr; ] - ] &larr;</span> 02:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per all above.] 03:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' ] 07:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - notable term --] 08:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. WP:POINT. -- ]
*'''Delete'''. per ] et al. Maybe redirect to ]. ] 14:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to ], seems like a synonym. --] 15:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
::Hmm, ] sucks as an article, maybe redirect it somewhere better, or stick a flag on it to get it cleaned up. I was expecting a study of the oppression of women throughout human history. --] 16:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''-- ] 17:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep/Merge''' - I could see ] being merged with ]. --] 17:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. The term is used widely in the literature - see and . --] 18:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 18:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] ] 13:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ] or some such. I'd hate to see a bunch of minimally notable terms each having their own page. ] 15:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' this phrase is increasingly used to describe a real feature of life in much of the world. ] 15:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ]. --] 19:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' or '''merge'''. This is a fairly well-known term. ] 02:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Widespread and indeed notable enough concept. ] 17:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above, another ]. ''']'''] 01:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Move to Wikitonary''', if it's a phrase definition covered by other articles, move the phrase and merge the info--] 04:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
*<s>'''Verify or Delete'''</s> If the editor is adding material that contradicts the sources, that's absolutely ] at work. Redirect to ] if not verifiable. Real terms do not excuse misrepresentations of their usage. ] 18:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
**'''Keep (Update)'''] indicates that the term "sexual apartheid" tends to refer to just what the author says. Further verification may be in order, but I think this is reasonable. If there is dissent among sources as to what the term means, clarify within the article. ] 18:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:46, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 07:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Gender apartheid

Non-notable term and a POV-fork of sexism. It is interesting to observe that contrary to HOTR's view that "sexual apartheid" refers to LGBT issues, while "gender apartheid" refers to discrimination of women, the sources do not support it. For example, this Washington Post article refers to discrimination of women in Saudi Arabia as "sexual apartheid". In a nutshell, we have no reliable sources discussing the term and confirming its notability. Pecher 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

See also: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sexual apartheid
By that argument the plight of women in Saudi Arabia today is no different from, say, that of women in the US in the 1950s. Homey 17:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Indeed, both are forms of Sexism RenyD 18:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Simplistic. Homey 18:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Did you seriously attempt to compare the plight of women in the two countries across two different time periods? That's absurd. There's a sea of socio-policitical and even religious and economic differences in between the two. They're not comparable. --Strothra 19:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, sexism sucks as an article, maybe redirect it somewhere better, or stick a flag on it to get it cleaned up. I was expecting a study of the oppression of women throughout human history. --Coroebus 16:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.