Revision as of 17:27, 11 July 2013 editGreyshark09 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers42,564 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:54, 19 August 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:FutureTrillionaire/Archive 4) (bot | ||
(457 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Atschool|type=college|exams=no}} | |||
{{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 4 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 5 | |minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== |
== Precious anniversary == | ||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} --] (]) 09:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== File:Minecraft city hall.png listed for discussion == | |||
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) <small>(please use {{tlx|reply to|Chess}} on reply)</small><!--Template:Please ping--> 14:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
The user Pass a Method continues to cause me trouble for no reason too and deletes all the content. I noticed that he has been doing the same with you. What has be been doing with you --] (]) 21:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
::::Thanks--] (]) 21:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 00:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
== ISBNs == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 14:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi. You might wanna check it out a bit carefully. Hyphen placement varies. I don't know the details, but country affects it for instance. Mr Stephen is rather expert at it, and may be right. --] (]) 23:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Okay, I've started a talk page discussion to get this sorted out.--] (]) 23:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Re: your change to the archiving at ] == | |||
(With ). I guess I don't understand why threads without recent responses should be kept on the main talkpage. As it stands now, of the two posts extant on the main page, one thread is almost 7 months old. Of the threads that were archived in the Bot's last pass (which archived a large chunk of posts dating from 2009-2011), if 5 threads had been kept the three threads with the most recent posts were dated December 2012, November 2012 and August 2012...so no one had responded to those threads for 7 months, 8 months and almost a year. For people who come to Misplaced Pages with outdated browsers or older computers or accessing WP from mobile devices, long articles or talkpages can pose accessibility issues so I always think it's better not to keep everything on the main page. Your mileage may vary and that's cool, just wanted you to know why it had been set up the way it was. ] (]) 01:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:I totally understand. Having a huge talk page is not ideal, but sometimes I encounter old, but unreplied threads (usually left an IP) that contain some useful suggestions. I changed the minimum threads from 2 to 5. Hopefully, that won't cause a huge difference in terms of bytes.--] (]) 01:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::For the record, my original archiving edit gave the minimum threads left as 5, but the Bot changed it to 2 (it probably looks at threads-age/'days old' first and it then changed the code accordingly). ] (]) 02:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Minecraft == | |||
The nowiki was there before, i removed it accidentally. | |||
*Best regards, | |||
*Wschlitz 02:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:{{replyto|Wschlitz}} No, you added it. Look at carefully. Please don't use VisualEditor. It's very buggy.--] (]) 02:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Yeah, I did notice that. Alright, back to old editor I suppose.{{unsigned| Wschlitz}} | |||
== ] == | |||
Hey, would you care to do a source review for '']''? --] ] 06:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Sure. I'll take a look.--] (]) 12:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Responded. --] ] 18:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
==1RR arbitration for Syrian civil war articles== | |||
A request for Arbcom regarding creation of specific Syrian civil war 1RR arbitration tool is ] and if accepted will affect ] page and other related pages. The issue was previously ] and recommended for Arbcom solution on the issue by an administrator. As an editor involved in previous discussion on this topic, your opinion is requested, thank you.] (]) 17:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:54, 19 August 2024
This is FutureTrillionaire's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Precious anniversary
Seven years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Minecraft city hall.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Minecraft city hall.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}}
on reply) 14:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for NATO
NATO has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Apple
Apple has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Laura Robson
Laura Robson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)