Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Haham hanuka 4: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:48, 2 June 2006 editDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits →[]: oppose← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:24, 3 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #fff5f5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ] that '''did not succeed'''. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>

===]=== ===]===
⚫ '''Final (0/6/0) ended 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)'''
''' '''
⚫ '''(0/6/0) ending <nowiki>07:43</nowiki>, 9 June 2006 (UTC)'''


{{User|Haham hanuka}} – I have much experience on Misplaced Pages, have been here for more than 2 years, my previous nom was rejected just beacuse I did not write about myself enough. {{User|Haham hanuka}} – I have much experience on Misplaced Pages, have been here for more than 2 years, my previous nom was rejected just beacuse I did not write about myself enough.


My main work here is to "make Misplaced Pages looks better" - sometimes by detecting vandals and reverting them. Please give me a chance. I won't let you down. --] 07:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC) My main work here is to "make Misplaced Pages looks better" - sometimes by detecting vandals and reverting them. Please give me a chance. I won't let you down. --] 07:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

'''I've cancelled my nomination.''' --] 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may vote. Nominees should not vote for themselves. See ] for more.--> <!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may vote. Nominees should not vote for themselves. See ] for more.-->
Line 17: Line 21:
#::Yes. It shows you don't know much about how things are done around here, and that you won't even read the top of the RfA page telling you to read the guide to RfAs, which gives you an easy way to make an nom- on your 4th attempt! --] 07:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #::Yes. It shows you don't know much about how things are done around here, and that you won't even read the top of the RfA page telling you to read the guide to RfAs, which gives you an easy way to make an nom- on your 4th attempt! --] 07:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#:::Actually it's just the 2nd try (though you were opposed for having a malformed RfA the first time, you'd think you'd fix it this time); why is this page at 4? --] 07:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #:::Actually it's just the 2nd try (though you were opposed for having a malformed RfA the first time, you'd think you'd fix it this time); why is this page at 4? --] 07:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. The user rarely if ever uses edit summaries. Has been seem to label articles as POV without explanation (has done this on many occassions). Has attempted to close AfD discussions despite not being an admin and also involved in the discussion. Getting involved in 3RR and then using anonymous IP address rather than logons to bypass the block. I don't think behaviour like this is what we want in a admin. Sorry. ] ] 07:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. The user rarely if ever uses edit summaries. Has been seem to label articles as POV without explanation (has done this on many occassions). Has attempted to close AfD discussions despite not being an admin and also involved in the discussion. Getting involved in 3RR and then using anonymous IP address rather than logons to bypass the block. I don't think behaviour like this is what we want in a admin. Sorry. ] ] 07:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', fails ]. - ] 08:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', fails ]. - ] 08:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Edit summary use and per Ben.''']'''<sup>]</sup> 08:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Edit summary use and per Ben.''']'''<sup>]</sup> 08:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#:So I'll use edit summaries, just because I didn't use it I cannot be an admin? Give me a chance! --] 08:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #:So I'll use edit summaries, just because I didn't use it I cannot be an admin? Give me a chance! --] 08:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--] 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--] 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --] <sup>]</sup> 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --] <sup>]</sup> 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
#:They're not "gone," the RfA is just way malformed and never had them in the first place. --] 08:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

#::That's partially my point. --] <sup>]</sup> 09:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
'''Neutral''' '''Neutral'''


Line 29: Line 34:
'''Comments''' '''Comments'''
<!-- begin editcount box--> <!-- begin editcount box-->
User's last 2000 edits.''']'''<sup>]</sup> 08:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC) User's last 2000 edits.''']'''<sup>]</sup> 08:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
<pre>--Viewing contribution data for user Haham hanuka (over the 2000 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ) <pre>--Viewing contribution data for user Haham hanuka (over the 2000 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ)
Time range: 127 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Time range: 127 approximate day(s) of edits on this page
Line 77: Line 82:
Category talk 1 Category talk 1
Misplaced Pages 161 Misplaced Pages 161

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either ] or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

]

Latest revision as of 05:24, 3 March 2023

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Haham hanuka

Final (0/6/0) ended 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Haham hanuka (talk · contribs) – I have much experience on Misplaced Pages, have been here for more than 2 years, my previous nom was rejected just beacuse I did not write about myself enough.

My main work here is to "make Misplaced Pages looks better" - sometimes by detecting vandals and reverting them. Please give me a chance. I won't let you down. --Haham hanuka 07:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I've cancelled my nomination. --Haham hanuka 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


Support


Oppose

  1. Oppose. Malformed RfA, didn't even nom himself or accept before putting himself on the main page, and this subpage is malformed. --Rory096 07:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    Does it make me a bad admin? --Haham hanuka 07:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    Yes. It shows you don't know much about how things are done around here, and that you won't even read the top of the RfA page telling you to read the guide to RfAs, which gives you an easy way to make an nom- on your 4th attempt! --Rory096 07:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    Actually it's just the 2nd try (though you were opposed for having a malformed RfA the first time, you'd think you'd fix it this time); why is this page at 4? --Rory096 07:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  2. Oppose. The user rarely if ever uses edit summaries. Has been seem to label articles as POV without explanation (has done this on many occassions). Has attempted to close AfD discussions despite not being an admin and also involved in the discussion. Getting involved in 3RR and then using anonymous IP address rather than logons to bypass the block. I don't think behaviour like this is what we want in a admin. Sorry. Ben W Bell talk 07:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose, fails 1FA. - Mailer Diablo 08:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose. Edit summary use and per Ben.Voice-of-All 08:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    So I'll use edit summaries, just because I didn't use it I cannot be an admin? Give me a chance! --Haham hanuka 08:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--Andeh 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  6. Oppose. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --Lord Deskana 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    They're not "gone," the RfA is just way malformed and never had them in the first place. --Rory096 08:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    That's partially my point. --Lord Deskana 09:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral


Comments User's last 2000 edits.Voice-of-All 08:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 

--Viewing contribution data for user Haham hanuka (over the 2000 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ)
Time range: 127 approximate day(s) of edits on this page
Most recent edit on: 8hr (UTC) -- 02, Jun, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 14hr (UTC) -- 27, January, 2006
Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits: 53.45% Minor edits: 27.78%
Average edits per day: 15.37 (for last 500 edit(s))
Article edit summary use (last 821 edits) : Major article edits: 63.21% Minor article edits: 29.57%
Analysis of edits (out of all 2000 edits shown of this page):
Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/sourcing): 2% (40)
Minor article edits (small content/info/reference additions): 1.35% (27)
Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 55.65% (1113)
Breakdown of all edits:
Unique pages edited: 1127 | Average edits per page: 1.77 | Edits on top: 6.45%
Significant edits (non-minor/reverts): 5.25% (105 edit(s))
Minor edits (non-reverts): 61.05% (1221 edit(s))
Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 7.2% (144 edit(s))
Unmarked edits: 26.5% (530 edit(s))
Edits by Misplaced Pages namespace:
Article: 83.3% (1666) | Article talk: 4.1% (82)
User: 2.1% (42) | User talk: 4.4% (88)
Misplaced Pages: 3.6% (72) | Misplaced Pages talk: 0% (0)
Image: 1% (20)
Template: 0.4% (8)
Category: 0.5% (10)
Portal: 0.25% (5)
Help: 0% (0)
MediaWiki: 0% (0)
Other talk pages: 0.35% (7)
Username Haham_hanuka
Total edits 5839
Distinct pages edited 3526
Average edits/page 1.656
First edit 23:34, September 29, 2004
(main) 5025
Talk 152
User 151
User talk 159
Image 82
Image talk 1
Template 27
Template talk 8
Category 72
Category talk 1
Misplaced Pages 161
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category: