| Revision as of 15:10, 2 June 2006 editAndriyK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:01, 24 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,530 edits Added: Talk:September 11 attacks. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
{{shortcut|]}} |
|
|
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{RFCheader|History and geography}} |
|
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*]: ongoing NPOV dispute concerning using the word "liberate" in the context of the restoring of the Soviet control over the territory of the present-day Ukraine during the WWII.--] 15:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
*<s>]: ongoing dispute over POV re: atrocities and invasion. Users keep reverting each other, and calling the others' contributions 'vandalism'. 15:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)</s> No edit war but reverting blanking by permanently banned user ]. Please report any new incidents ]]] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 21:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
I'd like to understand why we don't keep than the old-fashioned image montage in the article at the moment. Besides, is obviously better in terms of framing and resolution, as well as showing the exact moment when the second plane crashed into the WTC. ] (]) 21:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
*]: Content dispute about the use of the alternative name, Révkomárom in the head of the article. Please give your opinion and vote in the poll. ] 16:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*]: Content/NPOV dispute about Jefferson and slavery. 16:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
*]: Content/NPOV dispute regarding reason for the invasion. See this poll: -- 07:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Should the article’s infobox reflect EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6? This question stems from the fact the infobox inputs can only accept a single set of values (i.e. EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6, not both). The EF2/T4 rating comes from a peer reviewed paper by ] and Stuart Robinson with the Haag Engineering Co. in the ] in August 2006. The F3/T5-6 rating comes from the ] (TORRO), the creators of the ], T-scale, . |
|
*]: NPOV issue: one side insist on adding NPOV tag but makes no other edits in the article. Debate on talk concerns whether any sources have been provided that support the NPOV tag. |
|
|
*]: Is the title of the article valid? Should it be redirected to ]? — 14:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: Dispute over the name. Discussion effectively ended before it began, with a vote. Majority of editors claim the name is the most common: google . The official, phonetically-instructive name is not considered due to hits. ] 08:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] — essentially to what extent minority opinions should be represented in view of the treatment of the topic. ] ] 15:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] I would welcome comments on the issues . --] 11:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] There have been discussions and edit wars about Starčević's racism. --] <sup>]</sup> 05:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] -- whether disclaimer as to whom "Gao" and "Cui" referred to is necessary in the description of the incident leading to Cui Hao's death. 05:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] and ] -- whether the articles should include the names of the dynasties whose histories are covered by those two works. 04:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - Should the white sparkling wine from the Champagne region of France be spelled with a capital letter — a glass of champagne, or a glass of Champagne? 13:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - Whether ] should be characterized as, in addition to occupying modern ], having also occupied parts of modern ], modern ], neither, or both. 03:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Ongoing dispute over whether city names in Ukraine and Belarus should be listed in Russian (e.g. Kiev), or Ukrainian / Belarusian (e.g. Kyiv). NPOV would seem to follow forms officially adopted by respective governments. Ukraine has adopted a list of "official" Latin-alphabet spellings, but Belarus has not - and several "Misplaced Pages" articles are internally inconsistent in this respect. 20:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Debate about introduction. Should the intro include a mention of Luther's writing on the Jews, and any connection to the Holocaust. Ongoing dispute on the inclusion, and/or phrasing of such a statement. 19:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Debate over the extent that the ]/] has control over this area 18:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - editors are in some dispute about whether or not an external link is an advertisement. 15:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - One editor has stopped assuming good faith, another is making unsourced additions to the article which the first is removing. The bone of contention is the term ''Vernichtungslager''. There is a discussion between them at the bottom of the talk page: ]. It would be good to have a few more editors with an interest in the subject. 21:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - The bulk of the page was deleted in February, several years' work of several people, based on the belief that the content is unencyclopaedic. They refer to a consensus which is far from obvious on talk page. More exact criteria could be applied to sort out the content and make it more encyclopaedic but mere deletion is nothing but throwing out the baby with the bath water. Talk page has a to a more meaningful earlier version which was inserted into External links as a compromise but some found it POV fork and removed it. Please help with your comments. 23:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - dispute over merging this article with ] which already includes the information. Article has been up for ] three times already, each time resulting in no concensus. 23:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - dispute over what or map to include, or whether to include a map, in the template of this article. 12:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - two camps of editors, one of which thinks that the article is POV (though POV sections are not identified) and keeps redirecting it to a disambiguation page, and the other which thinks it should exist. 18:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**I do not know if this is the proper procedure to handle the issue. One side wants to blank the contents, in fact deleting it. The article should have been marked for ]. -- ] 02:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Could use some more eyes here; one editor seems to be putting in some strongly POV material, including questionable translations from de:Misplaced Pages, here andin other articles. --04:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - there is a long-standing content dispute over the reliability of a particular source used to create the "other meanings" section. The article was recently put up for AfD, in which the admin adjudicating the AfD said that it is a content dispute, and thus should be mediated on that level. Users {{user|Hanuman Das}} and {{user|Baba Louis}} have been reverting to their definition and deleting attempts from other editors to improve the article. One admin {{user|Bhadani}} has stated that the source they used is weak as a self-published source; another editor {{user|Hamsacharya dan}} quotes ] which states that self published sources belong on articles about the person who quoted them, and not on other articles, which should quote objective sources. This page desperately needs more objective opinions about direction of content. 05:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* On ] Dispute over inclusion of a quote by a Nobel laureate in the introduction. 18:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Edit war between admin {{user|Mel Etitis}} and anon {{user|202.156.6.54}}, over Sima Qian's birth and death dates. Both parties have resulted to insults, accusations of lack of sources (even though both sides have actually cited sources), &c., and Mel Etitis has also accused me of bias. Intervention is badly needed. --] (]) 16:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ]. A strong PoV-pushing by ] led to a revert war between two of us. Maybe it belongs to ], but at this stage it's essentially a content issue. The bottom line is, he tries to retrofit all Bosnian (pre)medieval history as the sole heritage of ] ethnic group, and states he's unwilling to compromise and making insults . ] 16:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ]. Could we please get some fresh eyes? Though the article itself is stable, there's a disagreement over the verifiability of one particular image, and the language has gotten oddly heated. --16:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ], ]. Edit war over whether a certain factual statement is important enough to be placed in the beginning of the article and whether the existence of certain quotes of disputed authenticity is to be mentioned in the end of the article. Both sides have kept reverting for ages, practically refusing to compromise, and a third party, which is indifferent to the dispute, is forced to incorporate his edits in both versions to make sure they stay on the page. Attempts at negotiations have been made by the different users involved, besides the talk page, in e.g. ] and ]. 09:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]. A disagreement over whether this party should be referred to as "Democratic-Republican" or "Republican" (the latter is the original name, and increasingly used by historians, but may lead fo to confusion with the modern Republican Party). |
|
|
*] A disagreement has arise which raises some fairly fundamental questions over the best approach to writing Misplaced Pages articles. Is it legitimate to condense a lengthy article if the content is duplicated elsewhere (in this case mostly the ])? 11:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Heated edit war over the alleged oppression and revolt of Shekhawati's farming community. The conflict matter stems around the existence of taxes which were levied on the farmers. One editor may also be related to a prominent figure in their revolt. 06:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] There is a question regarding the use of "Spanish" vs. "Spaniard" in referring to those from Spain who conquered and ruled Latin America during the ]. 07:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]. Edit war over a paragraph regarding policies of the Child welfare department of the city of Ra'anana towards divorced fathers. Several users have voiced the opinion that this is minor local news, not appropriate encyclopedic content: but one user is aggresively defending its inclusion. Additional voices would be appreciated. --] 10:33, 20 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Resolve use of a title for the article's subject. This is a civil, minor dispute, but the two parties have been unable to reach agreement on use within the article of a title, ''Princess of Parma'', that one party feels is appropriate and in keeping with the traditional use for persons in this historical category, while the other feels the title is an inadequately sourced alternative and as such is misleading. There are a number of other WP articles in which the same principle is involved. 05:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*], ] There’s a dispute on the guidelines for adding foreign names in the lead of the articles about the region. 07:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - whether or not it should be quoted from sources that the Ottoman Empire was in fact a multi-ethnic state where religious faith was the determinant factor over ethnic origin. 00:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*<s>]:dispute over biblical reference to Isles of Elishah. One user claims this is reference to Britain or the British Isles, others can find no evidence. 20:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)</s> |
|
|
::The user making the claim has not posted a message to the talk page for a month, so the debate would seem to have ended. ] 19:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: dispute over relevance and interpretation (original research?) of two events. ] 13:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: No dispute, just looking for input on the use of "Flemish". 17:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] — There is a dispute on how to apply ].... Should "East Sea" redirect to ] first or disambiguate first?12:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - whether "East Sea" is English or Korean local language term ] 01:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - edit war over the inclusion/exclusion of certain external links, and also over other wording, all of which I feel completely lost about, but I want to see some neutral editors with some expertise involved to evaluate the situation. --] (]) 05:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Discussions of race - are Persians "descendants of Aryans"? 19:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Khomeini's views on non-Muslims. 19:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Can Rudolf Virchow be listed as a Freemason? 07:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Accuracy dispute over quotes in ] and appropriateness of quote in ]. 01:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - there is a debate over whether goldcoastaustralia.com meets the guidelines for being an external link from the ] article. See also ]. 07:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - re Eire's refugee policies during WWII, and general military options from WWII, which users Demiurge and Jtdirl insist on imposing their own opinions without sources or citations and neither is qualified as a military historian. They are censors not historians, and refuse to engage in conversation on discussion page or provide any reason other than boilerplate nonsense ("sockpuppet vandal") to censor anything they do not agree with. 14:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*], Which countries are part of Scandinavia? 00:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* Should ] point to the Philosopher, or a disambiguation page? Your thoughts welcome at ]. 19:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Long edit war about the numbers in a chart about casualities during World War II along with some other issues. It was protected for 2 1/2 months...unprotected with no agreements made. It's been unprotected for 3 days and things are right back to where they were, including users accusing others of vandalism. Neutral voices would be very welcome. 17:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] How should English Misplaced Pages articles spell the name of the two Aztec emperors? Montezuma, Moctezuma or Moteuczoma? 07:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Shouldn't articles about battles and/or disputed military outposts be allowed to included the names by which both sides referred to them? Thanks. 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] A long argument about the oportunity to rename ] into ] and so on until ] into ] (and to keep ] as a redirect to ]). ] 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] It is an arguement whether he should be considered a ] or a ]. --] 16:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] There is an unresolved dispute as to which reference to use for this list/ranking. The choice is between the UN urban agglomerations list and the list by the website citypopulation.de. 20:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] whilst everyone seems to agree that the anceint Scots Gaelic etymology of the name should be included in the article, should the Gaelic name of this Lowland Scots town (unused locally) been given equal prominence in an infobox. --15:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
** There is a general discussion about the matter ] - '''] ('']'')''' 15:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] In the introductive paragraph of that article, the asserted "brief period of independence (1917-1921)" is based on ] (the kind hypothetical reader may take a look on ] and the quoted sources in ]). 16:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Question over primary source as an encyclopedic reference. 21:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute and possible edit war has gotten out of hand, with constant POV pushing and no cooperation, could soon extend into flaming and personal attacks. Misplaced Pages policy and verifiability of article has been compromised, and all attempts to solve the problems ends in revert. |
|
|
--04:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute on whether this should be an article or a disambig page (see also ] and its history), and whether it is a ] of ] (see also ]). 01:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]:There has been a serious edit war over the accuracy and neutrality of information added to the article, with personal attacks and accussations. One of the involved editors asked for Full Protection (granted) and put the case before the Mediation Committee, which was not accepted by the other editor, who seems to prefer instead to have other fellow countrymen as mediators.15:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: Months-long edit war over the validity of a view that Paris' commuter belt should seem as the city itself; predjudiced (and constant) reverts and other bad editing habits. 09:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: There already exist more accurate exit lists on several articles such as ], and thus the page was edited to link to those to avoid a ]. Several editors are reverting this for no apparent reason. 07:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute whether to include the ] and the ], both targets of revisionism, in the article. 18:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over whether al-Khwarimzi was an Arab or a Persian. 14:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over what should and what should not be in the article. 10:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over inclusion of disputed material. 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] and ]: There are four sections of one road, Queen's Road East, Queensway, Queen's Road Central, Queen's Road West. Should the stub article Queensway, be merged into the article Queen's Road? 22:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]Narrowly averted edit war over whether or not Vietnamese usage of this sauce should be included. ] claims that since the sauce is a Chinese one, mentionm of its use in Vietnamese cuisine is non-prominent and should be excluded from article. I disagree. Comments requested.--] 01:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the infobox can only contain one set of the ratings, this discussion more or less needs to determine which source (Haag Engineering Co. or TORRO) should be the infobox source. |
|
] |
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' — EF2/T4 using the Haag Engineering Co. paper. |
|
] |
|
|
|
*'''Option 2''' — F3/T5-6 using the ] paper. |
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''The ]''' (] 03:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What should the infobox indicate as the location of the hostilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' - ] and ], ] |
|
|
*'''Option 2''' - ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Please enter Option 1 or Option 2, followed by a brief statement, in the Survey. Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Discussion section. ]] 16:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the this Misplaced Pages page contain the section begining: article in the newspaper '']'', headlined "The Secret of Sabiha Hatun"? ] (]) 09:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. ] (]) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 23:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should this article have a lead image? If so, which image should be used? ] (]) 07:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
_-_B6019~11.jpg){kind=link}