Misplaced Pages

User talk:Irishpunktom: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:01, 4 June 2006 editRaphael1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,734 edits Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review#User:Raphael1/Wikiethics← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:07, 6 February 2024 edit undoأنون (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users567 edits Nomination of Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar for deletion: new sectionTag: New topic 
(272 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=1 October 2013}}
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
==Dispute on FGC==
|-
Hi. I am having a dispute with a user on ]. I noticed your previous contribution and hoped you might provide some third-party commentary on a dispute at ]. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. ] (]) 01:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
|]
|-
|<center> <font size="+2">'''</center></font>
|}
]


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coldastheclay.jpg==
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
== Copyright ==


I've removed two copyrighted images from your userpage. Copyrighted images are used in articles under a 'fair-use' claim, unfortunately, under wp policy, fairuse claims cannot be extended to userspace. See ] for details. --] ] 10:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expressveil.gif==
==]==
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Well done! -- ] ] 17:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
:No problem - interesting chap! Given the other Francis Charterises (the Earls of Wemyss) I have put him back as the Colonel... - ] ] 19:22, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


== P.G. Tatchell ==


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg==
I see you have added the {{tl|POV}} tag again. Last time you added this, you did not explain why. I expect to see a rationale for adding the tag on the article talk page without delay, say by mid-day today, or I will remove the tag. ] | ] 10:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 14:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
==Your note==
It might be better for someone else to take a look at it now that I've asked David to remove the protection. I'll wait for a bit to see what the response is. It probably should be protected as I see what looks like 3RR violations, and it would be better to protect than to start blocking, but the question now is whose version to protect on. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 14:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
==New Islamophobia Images==
Irishpunktom, what are the origins and who is the copyright holder who has '''irrevocably released all rights''' to the two new images you've added to the ] article? ] 15:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
:I see well if you're not inclined to provide such information then I'll be sure to tag them for deletion due to rights concerns, etc. ] 15:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
::Much like how you expressed ''good faith'' concerns over the MANIFESTO article before, I too have my own concerning these images. Are you surprised? ] 15:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
:::That's fine, I'll be sure to take the necessary steps to ensure that these new images do not remain on Misplaced Pages under their current licensing tags. ] 15:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
:''Dislike'' is a serious mischaracterization of my feelings on this matter. Regardless, it appears that a fellow editor with my tagging. ] 15:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


== AfD ==
==Image Tagging ]==


Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article ]. There is a new AfD ]. Regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 05:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
{| align="CENTER" style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border:8px solid #FF0000; padding:5px;"
|-
|]
| <center><big>This media may be '''deleted'''.</big>
</center>
|}


Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg}==
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading ], and then use a tag such as {{tlp|fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an ] linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
:* That there is a ] on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
:* That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.


If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. ] ] 15:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC) If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. ] (]) 11:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


== Miraj.jpg ==
*Please follow the instructions listed on ]. Thanks. ] ] 15:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


Hi, would you please tell me the reference of this picture :, We in fa.wiki want to make an article and we need the complete information about this picture. thankx
== ] ==
--] (]) 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


==Proposed deletion of Zachariah Blanton==
Someone beat me by a few seconds - I was going to object to prod as well. Here's what my edit summary would have been: "object to prod. term is, article is not. Should have read talk page before prodding." Cheers. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]/]</small> 16:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
]
:I am in no way offended, though I tend to err on the side of over-notification. No worries. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]/]</small> 03:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
:<b>Convicted murderer of no significant or lasting notability; now amounts to a BLP violation as references are all dead links.</b>


All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ].
== DYK! ==


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


== Regarding Image Muhammad_callig.gif ==
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
This is regarding your uploaded image ]. As per the Muslim viewpoint, the name of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) must always include the honorifics 'Peace Be Upon Him' in English or 'sallAllahu `alayhi wa sallam' in Arabic. Your image has none. This image could be acceptable as an image depicting the word 'Muhammed' but certainly cannot refer to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). The concern I have is that this image is used in template { {Muhammad} } everywhere on Misplaced Pages. Request you to please upload an image with the honorifics included. Thanks ] (]) 13:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|-
|]
|''']''' has been updated. A fact from the article ''']''', which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the ]. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on ].
|}


==Unreferenced BLPs==
== ] ==
] Hello Irishpunktom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. Please note that all biographies of living persons '''must be sourced'''. If you were to add ], ] ] to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:


# ] - <small>{{findsources|Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar}}</small>
I noticed that this image, which is on the Main Page (congrats) has a copyright symbol showing, but there is no explanation about this. Do you know where the "© NPGD1263.jpg" on the image comes from or its significance? You migh want to follow-up on this. Sorry, I do not have a W account; I am just trying to help. -- ] 06:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Svat Soucek}}</small>
Thanks!--] (]) 23:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


==] of ]==
:Yes - I noticed that too. Presumably it is an image from the ]. Quite how they maintain copyright on a scan of an 18th century drawing I don't know. But I see someone has cropped the image to remove the tag, following some discussion in ]. -- ] ] 15:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
]


The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
==Image Tagging for ]==
:<b>Non-notable author. No evidence of notability given, and a Google search finds only directory listings, no significant coverage in reliable sources.</b>
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.


While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
*]
*]


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 10:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 02:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
== 7/7 Truth Movement ==
Interested? - http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Wikipedians_of_the_7/7_Truth_Movement - If so please ask those on here whom else you think would be interested. Thank you and keep up the great work.


==File source problem with File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif==
==Mail==
]
Bro, you wanted to mail me something before, but i couldnt fix my mail. Im curious about what you wanted to say... --] 11:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.


If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Misplaced Pages's ], ]. If the image is ] and ], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)''' per ] criterion ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
== Highway's RfA ==
<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px orange; background-color: white;">
]'''<font color=orange>Request for Adminship</font>'''
----
Thank you for supporting/objecting/tropicanising me in ] for Adminship. Although I wasn't promoted to admin status, with a final vote count of 14/27/12, I am very happy with the response I received from my fellow Wikipedians. I was pleasantly suprised at the support, and was touched by it. I will also work harder on preventing disputes and boosting my edit count (which is on the up), so thank you to all your objectors. Hopefully I will re-apply soon and try again for the mop. Thanks again, ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup></sup> <!--- Note blatently stole the layout from ]/Template:Hca --> </div>


==Fair use rationale for File:Kamrams coins.jpg==
==<span class="plainlinks"></span>==
]
Hi there, The Islam template is used in all Islam related articles and it carries an image of the mosque, if you take a close look at the other religion templates they all carry an icon that actually symbolizes the particular religion. The question is what symbolizes Islam? As a muslim you would agree that we cannot Idolize any symbol as sacred as it would be ]. So the next question is what kind of icon would correctly represent Islam and Muslims? It is undoubtedly the ], because without it we wouldn't be muslims. So I have suggested to change the template image from a masjid to a Masjid with the Shahada in it. In order to have the image in the template I need build some consense, could you kindly visit the talk page (]) and make your suggestion, lets have the template change so it will correctly represent Islam. (You do not have to support it if you dont like it). thanks in advance. ] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> 11:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ].


If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 17:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks for your comments brother, I really appreciate them. ] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> 14:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Muslim history==


''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 21:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
==New Islamophobia section==
Irishpunktom, would you respond to ] on ]? Thanks. ] 10:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
:Greeting Irishpunktom, in your editing of this article (and on Misplaced Pages in general) please be aware of the following Misplaced Pages guidelines: ]. Thanks. ] 08:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::The problem in your editing on this article is that it frequently falls afoul of the above guidelines. The Avoid neologisms guidelines are in place toward NPOV ends. ] 08:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::That's true, but my ''good faith'' reasoning for the AfD was due to the simple fact that the Misplaced Pages is becoming the defacto primary source for the the term which is very counter to ]. This truth is further evidenced by . The way that the article stands now after your latest edit on it doesn't maintain Misplaced Pages's neutrality from it because of the article's actual use of the term which ] is particularly clear about ''not'' doing. ] 08:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::::I see you're edit warring with Karl Meier now. You both should stop immediately while bearing in mind ]'s warning to both of you. ] 08:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:What has inclined you to inform me that WP:NEO is not policy (as though I didn't know it)? ] 09:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::I'm not ''enforcing'' it but it is perfectly logical for editors like myself (particularly when dealing with a neologism like "islamophobia") to be citing it in my efforts to maintain neutrality on its use and the article about it. ] 09:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::How would you feel about asking ] to help us come to some sort of agreement on this issue? I'm becoming really inclined to ask for his assistance. ] 09:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::::Mostly because ] is already somewhat informed on these issues and has shown no bias in his warnings to you and Karl. ] 09:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:Ok, I've put in for ] while we engage the dispute resolution process. ] 09:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::What do you think? Something like ]? ] 09:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::That's funny that both you and ] don't want ] involved. That almost makes me think that he'd be the perfect person. I actually have had no direct involvement with Tony Sidaway myself. ] 09:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::::You know the the insinuating you're doing that I might be racist/islamophobic really reaks of mean-spiritedness. You must absolutely be aware of the ''numerous'' <s>positive</s> beneficial (towards NPOV ends) edits that I've made in terms of ] related subjects. Don't you ask yourself why a person might do that? ] 09:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:Ah, you're meaning a page for the acutal resolution process. Yes, that sounds good... I'm still wondering about my questions just above here. ] 09:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::Why would I revert ]'s myself if my motives weren't based upon ''good faith''? ] 10:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::And don't forget about the whole ] affair that I cracked... even ] will back me up on that. ] 10:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::::Your calling ] ] based upon the sole evidence of one link is '''not fair''' and additionally is completely out of accord with ]. I '''100% agree''' with you about that particular link but do you honestly think it is fair to automatically refer to someone by the very derogatory and ''incriminatory'' term "racist" based solely upon that?... Regardless even if you were right in your accusations (which again I think is '''highly, highly doubtful''') Misplaced Pages specifically prohibits editors from using such terminology when discussing other editors. ] 10:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
: I believe was the first mention of racism, no? ] 10:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
===Dispute resolution===
No, I have not yet filed... I am about to though... what with the 3RR report, your talk page and Karl's talk page.. I've been just a tad busy. Getting to it now. ] 10:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:Just so you know, I'm reading up on the processes... I should have a request filed shortly. ] 11:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
::That was my plan as well.. but we're not the only ones editing here... hehe. ] 11:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::Ok, we need to agree on what the dispute actually consists of. My contention is that actual ''utilization'' of the term ''islamophobia'' on Misplaced Pages needs to be ] including on the very article about it. Please explain your view here. ] 11:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::: Ok, Well, I disagree. I believe while in general that contention is a good one when dealing with neologisms, as Islamophobia has entered the mainstream, to such a degree that various governments have set up methods of combatting it, it shuld be utilised. --]\<sup>]</sup> 11:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:::::Ok good I just wanted to be clear on that... this in ''indeed'' a very big difference on both our parts and without dispute resolution I'm not quite sure how we could come to a compromise about it as to me this is ''fundamental'' difference of view. ] 11:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:Of the four options presented ] is there one that seems to make more sense to you than the others? I'm thinking mediation. ] 13:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


== Image deletion notification ==
===WP:PAIN===
Yes, the yellow card has been thrown and the ref is reviewing the footage. Any way that you can be pushed into dispute resolution any faster? In the interim, comments like should be avoided. I know that you're firm in your belief, but it ''is'' possible to be right and be blocked at the same time. - ]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 12:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:Gah, that wasn't strong enough. "Quit it or else." There, that's better. I recomend that you avoid all mention of he-who-shall-not-be named outside of dispute resolution and Netscott's talk, and that you be circumspect there. An attack is in the eye of the beholder, and we must err on the side of caution. There is nothing to be gained in the short term from banging on about this, so, um, "Quit it or else." - ]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 13:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


FYI - I nominated an image you uploaded for deletion . ] (]) 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
== 3RR violation ==
:assuming it was you commenting there as an IP, I asked a follow-up question. ] (]) 19:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
::I responded there, this time with a link to a page where the image was found four months before you uploaded it here.... Any explanation? ] (]) 20:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


== File:Marblearch.JPG listed for deletion ==
Tom, you've been blocked for a ] violation on the ] article: . There were a number of other complex reverts I didn't bother documenting. When you return, please attempt to work ''with'' other editors. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 18:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 17:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
== File:Charteris.jpeg listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 17:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
==Non-free rationale for File:Plagge.JPG==
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ].


If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 00:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
== ] RFA - Thanks! ==
==Nominated for deletion (4th time)==
I'm trying to get this article deleted, ], please consider entering the discussion! ] (]) 16:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


== Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library! ==
Thank you for your vote on my ]. Unfortunately there was no consensus reached at 43 support, 18 oppose and 8 neutral. I've just found out that there is a feature in "my preferences" that forces me to use edit summaries. I've now got it enabled :) Thanks again. ] | <span style="color: green;" lang="pa">ਸੁਖ</span> | ] 15:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


{|style="background:#CEE3F6; border:1px solid #cee3f6; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"
== Articles for deletion/Religion of Peace ==
|-

!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%;"|] Misplaced Pages Partnership - We need ''you!''
You might be interested in the ] on the article ]. ] 20:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
|-

|]
== Freagra ==
|Hi '''{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}ROOTPAGENAME}}'''! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the ], a project of the ] and ]. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Misplaced Pages using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate ]. Thanks for editing Misplaced Pages and I look forward to working with you! 14:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

|}
Go raibh maith agat! An bhfiul 'ám agat, mar, ba mhaith liom (agus Netscott) daoine "neodracht" cúntóir a féach ar an airteagal seo. (you can probably see why i don't edit ga.wikipedia !) --]\<sup>]</sup> 16:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0531 -->
:Ní bheinn in ann é sin a dhéanamh daoibh, toisc go bhfuilim i measc scrúdaithe choláiste anois, agus go n-imeoidh mé go dtí'n Ollóin an Déardaoin seo chugainn. B'fhéidir go mbeidh ] nó ] in ann cabhrú libh. ] (]) 17:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
==Mediation on ]==
Irishpunktom, please review ] and ]. Thanks. ] 17:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
==Misplaced Pages and neutrality==
Irishpunktom, going over some articles that I observe, I noticed an attempted move made on your part for the article ]. You may be surprised to know but counter to my previous way of thinking, I'm now actually inclined to agree with you on your move. I would sooner vote for ] though. To me this makes sense in the same way that the title ] makes sense. What is funny is how your inclination towards neutral point of view in that regard is virtually identical to my inclination towards neutral point of view in regards to the utilization of the word "]". I am confident that there are many others who share these views and so what I'm wondering is how we might be able to utilize these similiarities to truly benefit the Misplaced Pages project in terms of neutrality? I am inclined to think that if we support eachother's views in this regard the project will improve. ] 06:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

== Muslim flat-earth theories ==

Tom, I wish you wouldn't keep adding that factoid re "Muslim scientists calculated the earth's diameter as ...." The only point seems to be bragging. I don't see that any individual is made bigger or better by making claims of past achievement for a group to which he or she belongs. It's like graffiti artists tagging, except that in this case it's the past, not walls and subway cars. Is anyone any bigger or better if his "tag" appears all over the place? Is anyone any better if he identifies with a sports team and his team wins? Is anyone any more important if members of his religion (a religion with millions of members) did thus and such?

Those weren't "Muslim" scientists, they were scholars living in Baghdad under the Abbasid caliphs, more than a thousand years ago. Either they belong to nobody, or everybody. Yes, let's all take pride in the great things HUMAN BEINGS have done, and learn caution and self-examination by contemplating the horrible things humans have done too. ] 10:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
==Stalking==
Who's the stalker now? I will either strike the comments out or remove them... which do you think makes more sense? ] 15:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
:I'm curious to know, do you really want to be editing in support of an editor (Resid Gulerdem) who has ''independently'' been on the Misplaced Pages of his own native tongue? Myself, I try to choose my "battles" wisely. ] 15:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
::Well by all means edit in support of him and watch your own reputation be tarnished and watch his negativity and disruptiveness further influence Misplaced Pages. Don't forget that the initiator of this latest series of events concerning Resid's disruptiveness was initiated by a fellow of his, the Turkish ]. And as far as good faith is concerned you are rather asisine in making such comments when ] such demonstrations. ] 15:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
:::Well, I'm determining from your commentary that in fact the comments should just be in effect "reverted" out (through deletion) rather than struck out. I'd be fine with doing that. ] 15:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
:You should know as well that much like your utilization of the word "racist" when referring to ] referring to me as a stalker or wikistalker qualifies as a ''personal attack''. Your continued mischaracterization of myself is inclining me to follow ]'s example and post a ] notice which actually might have an effect in terms of curbing your repeated demonstrations of bad faith. ] 15:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
::I suppose I should do the same and start with ]. What you are now fully demonstrating in your talk page commentary is that admin ] fell on "deaf" eyes. ] 16:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
:::Labeling my actions as ''intimidation'' is another perfect example of your bad faith Irishpunktom. Being that you are the only individual who has has ever accused me of bad faith on Misplaced Pages and being that the same '''cannot''' be said for yourself I'm inclined to doubt your estimation of my character while I don't doubt my own regarding yourself. ] 16:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Guys! This seems to be lasting forever. Please make a real effort to sort it out because it is bothering. I'd be ready to help you in case you need it. Cheers -- ''] 16:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>
:Tom! Any comment from your side about mediating? Please let me know mate. Cheers -- ''] 19:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>
::Any news man? -- ''] 18:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)''
I have no idea if there is any policy or guideline that mandates stiking out of suckpuppet contributions on talk pages, and I'm too lazy to find out. I think the easiest course of action would be to simply archive the talk page, with or without strikes. ] 17:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

==You're edit warring, again==
Irishpunktom, from looking at the of ] it is clearer and clearer that you really have no qualms about edit warring. Why do you think you've been warned about this (particularly in regards to who you're edit warring with)? Hello! Dispute resolution, anyone? ] 18:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

:Irishpunktom , you tell me if you need a friendly hand. --] 19:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

==] to ]==
You might want to comment on an idea of Szvest's ]. ] 16:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
:Tom, i suggest that you discuss the points you are disagreeing with at the article's talk page. That's the proper manner. I don't want to see anyone of you blocked recklessly because we can't discuss things. Please make use of the talk page.
:Re your answer of today about my mediation. Could you please tell me about your concerns. I need a honest opinion about the <small><font color=green>conflict</font></small> between you and Scott. Cheers -- ''] 17:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>
::Thanks Tom for the details you provided. I'll have a look at them this afternoon and see what i'd suggest to sort this out between yourselves. Cheers -- ''] 10:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>

==greetings==
Greetings. quick non-encyclopedic question. Have you read ''On Late Style'', and if so, what are your thoughts?--]\<sup>]</sup> 11:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

:I plan to buy and read this book next weekend. Thanks.
:] 05:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


== An RfC that you ''may'' be interested in... ==
== sure... ==


As one of the previous contributors to {{Tl|Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a ] started on the talk page as to ]. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
I only read the links you posted which were the BBC one which said his injuries were not life threatening, and ABC which just said a guy was shot. Just checking agrees with BBC. Feel free to update if you see something else though :) ] | ] 15:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
: <small>This message was sent by ] (]) on behalf of <span class="nowrap">&#123;&#123;U&#124;]&#125;&#125;</span> <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Infobox_film/list&oldid=598721132 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:Veil Case Teacher.gif==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
== Are you an anti-Semite? ==


== ] ==
Well, according to ] you belong to "a small group of anti-Semites" on Misplaced Pages because you have received a certain barnstar. He has repeated the statement several times, for instance at ]. Perhaps you would be interested to have a word in it. // ]


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
:then i guess i must be a anti semite as well... i did'nt know i was one, but considering i have that barnstar, the evidence is conclusive :( --] 19:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 -->


{{tb|Talk:Seljuk}}
Be advised that this user has been blocked indefinitely.] 20:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
== United NationsN listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''United NationsN'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> - ''']''' <sup>(]) (]) (]) </sup> 03:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


== Nomination for merging of ] ==
== Hujum ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 09:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


== Nomination for merging of ] ==
I have a copy of Northrop's book, although I haven't read it yet as I'm more interested in the Tsarist period. I'll have a look at it though and see if I can add anything to the page. I haven't read ''On Late Style'' - I have a lot a sympathy for Said's politics, but I consider his ideas about ''Orientalism'' fairly absurd (as you might guess from my recent additions to his page on the critical response to the book). ''Orientalism'' is a set text for a course I sometimes teach in Imperial History but otherwise I don't go out of my way to read his work because I just don't think it's very relevant for historians (not if you actually believe in History as a discipline, anyway). ''On Late Style'' got some pretty shocking reviews. ] 06:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 10:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4#Heavy metal in Islamic countries}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 18:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
==Karl Meier==
<div class="afd-notice">
Please don't put the reference to Karl Meier on your user page again. It's a personal attack. --] 19:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== ] ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Since you previously showed interest in the former proposed policy Wikiethics, I'd like to inform you about ]. ] 15:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:07, 6 February 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Irishpunktom has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 October 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Dispute on FGC

Hi. I am having a dispute with a user on FGC. I noticed your previous contribution and hoped you might provide some third-party commentary on a dispute at Blackworm’s objections. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. Phyesalis (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coldastheclay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Coldastheclay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expressveil.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Expressveil.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg

Thank you for uploading Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article Hattrick. There is a new AfD here. Regards, Bastun 05:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Miraj.jpg

Hi, would you please tell me the reference of this picture :, We in fa.wiki want to make an article and we need the complete information about this picture. thankx --Achaemenian (talk) 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zachariah Blanton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zachariah Blanton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Convicted murderer of no significant or lasting notability; now amounts to a BLP violation as references are all dead links.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Image Muhammad_callig.gif

This is regarding your uploaded image File:Muhammad callig.gif. As per the Muslim viewpoint, the name of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) must always include the honorifics 'Peace Be Upon Him' in English or 'sallAllahu `alayhi wa sallam' in Arabic. Your image has none. This image could be acceptable as an image depicting the word 'Muhammed' but certainly cannot refer to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). The concern I have is that this image is used in template { {Muhammad} } everywhere on Misplaced Pages. Request you to please upload an image with the honorifics included. Thanks 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Irishpunktom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Svat Soucek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar

The article Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author. No evidence of notability given, and a Google search finds only directory listings, no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robofish (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kamrams coins.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kamrams coins.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Muslim history

Category:Muslim history, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Image deletion notification

FYI - I nominated an image you uploaded for deletion here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

assuming it was you commenting there as an IP, I asked a follow-up question. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I responded there, this time with a link to a page where the image was found four months before you uploaded it here.... Any explanation? Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Marblearch.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marblearch.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Charteris.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charteris.jpeg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Plagge.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plagge.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Nominated for deletion (4th time)

I'm trying to get this article deleted, List of former atheists and agnostics, please consider entering the discussion! Ncboy2010 (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Misplaced Pages Partnership - We need you!
Hi Irishpunktom! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Misplaced Pages using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Misplaced Pages and I look forward to working with you! 14:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Veil Case Teacher.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Veil Case Teacher.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Irishpunktom. You have new messages at Talk:Seljuk.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

United NationsN listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United NationsN. Since you had some involvement with the United NationsN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION 03:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Islamic holidays

Template:Islamic holidays has been nominated for merging with Template:Eid. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Muslimmonths

Template:Muslimmonths has been nominated for merging with Template:Religious year in Islam. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 10:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

"Heavy metal in Islamic countries" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Heavy metal in Islamic countries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4 § Heavy metal in Islamic countries until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lolekek (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Categories: