| Revision as of 20:50, 16 August 2013 editFutureTrillionaire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,232 edits →A barnstar for you!: thanks!← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:54, 19 August 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:FutureTrillionaire/Archive 4) (bot | ||
| (398 intermediate revisions by 94 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Atschool|type=college|exams=no}} | |||
| {{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 4 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} --] (]) 09:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Minecraft city hall.png listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) <small>(please use {{tlx|reply to|Chess}} on reply)</small><!--Template:Please ping--> 14:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| As you were involved in the nomination of Arkham City, I am just making you aware of this current nomination if yo get a chance to comment. Thanks for reading. ] (]) 18:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I will take a look in a few days. Right now I'm a little busy.--] (]) 04:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 00:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| I agree it's correct according to ], I just hope it doesn't come back to haunt you from those who are now going to demand references for these claims. ] (]) 17:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 14:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{replyto|Editor2020}} I was reluctant to do it, but it was requested at ].--] (]) 17:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == 2013 Latakia offensive == | |||
| I created a new article ]. ] (]) 02:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Cool, I'll check it out.--] (]) 02:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| The article is good i planned to make the article but you raced me and you made it,but why does it says to capture the strategic border area.] (]) 03:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == talkback on GAR Lithium == | |||
| {{talkback|Talk:Lithium/GA2}} ] (]) 11:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2013 == | |||
| ] Hello. It appears that you have been ''']'''—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence ]. While ] are allowed, they should be '''limited''' and '''nonpartisan''' in distribution and should reflect a '''neutral''' point of view. Please do not post notices which are ], which espouse a certain ] or side of a debate, or which are ] only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Misplaced Pages's principle of ]-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. <!-- Template:uw-canvass --> ] (]) 23:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I was very happy to see the ] article finally get ] to FA today. My hearty congratulations! You really should be very proud of yourself. Please accept this as a token of recognition from me. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—] ]</b> 15:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks! I owe you a debt of gratitude for all your helpful contributions to the article.--] (]) 15:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's really no problem. It was a pleasure to help out and it gives me (and many others) great personal satisfaction to see the Jesus article featured. If there's ever anything else I can lend a hand with, please let me know. Have a great rest of the week. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—] ]</b> 15:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {| border=1 | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| <div style="margin-left:65px;"> | |||
| ]<span style="position:relative; left:-231px; | |||
| top:-94px">]</span> | |||
| </div> | |||
| |- | |||
| |align=center|Take this barnstar, which is poured out for you.<br> | |||
| (Seriously, your work on this article is highly appreciated.)<br> | |||
| Congratulations. – ] <sup>(])</sup> 16:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Nice! That's very creative. Thank you for your in-depth review. The article was greatly improved because of it.--] (]) 17:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm very impressed that you managed to get such a high-profile topic to featured status--good work! ] (]) 20:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks!--] (]) 20:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:54, 19 August 2024
| This is FutureTrillionaire's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Minecraft city hall.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Minecraft city hall.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for NATO
NATO has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Apple
Apple has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Laura Robson
Laura Robson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)