Misplaced Pages

talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:47, 11 September 2013 editMiszaBot II (talk | contribs)259,776 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:06, 22 October 2023 edit undoAshvio (talk | contribs)318 edits NPOV and gender pronounsTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(21 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
__TOC__ __TOC__


== These horses go only one way == == NPOV and gender pronouns ==


Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? ] (]) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
I have the bit from ] suggesting that it would be appropriate to mention Creationism in an article ]. That article makes no such mention, correctly sussing out that it would be off topic, and we should anyway not be dictating content from a policy page. Our articles on similar topics, from ] to ] right down to ], likewise do not consider it an appropriate part of their respective topics. We might replace the text with something differentiating articles discussing the process itself from articles about the development or the social impact of the theory, but the section seems to stand fine without it. - ] <small>(])</small> 10:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

:Are there any reliable sources that indicate that ] people is useful discourse? Should we consider whether calling other users slurs is NPOV also? Not sure I understand the purpose of this question. ] (]) 09:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:06, 22 October 2023


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

NPOV and gender pronouns

Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? 212.55.46.63 (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Are there any reliable sources that indicate that misgendering people is useful discourse? Should we consider whether calling other users slurs is NPOV also? Not sure I understand the purpose of this question. Ashvio (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)