Misplaced Pages

Talk:Wildwood (Beckley, West Virginia): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:50, 13 September 2013 editVanished user 7b1215e7ef746ac20682e3dbe03f5b84 (talk | contribs)12,887 edits changed to start, unless there is an objection, article now has history and building details, as well as owner history← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:47, 28 September 2024 edit undoWest Virginian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,805 edits Assessment 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Start|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=|WV=Yes|WV-importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Museums|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|WV=Yes|WV-importance=Low}}
}}


== Could this now be a Start? == == Could this now be a Start? ==

Latest revision as of 17:47, 28 September 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMuseums Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: West Virginia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Could this now be a Start?

Open for any and all discussionCoal town guy (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I dunno. It seems to be a bunch of semi-unrelated facts strung together; I expect more cohesion in a start-class article. Also, I'm bothered by the amount of direct quotations. --Orlady (talk) 03:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I used the direct quotes from Jim Wood, the only person who bothered to write a history of Raleigh County WV, so in a sense, I wanted to provide authentic data, in other words, what did Alfred Beckley say about his own house. I agree about the organization part, and would be open to any and all suggestions. I tried to keep the purchase and original property name in the history sectionCoal town guy (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Just rewrote the article again, this time I think the flow is betterCoal town guy (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes, the flow is better, but I think it's still a stub because it still tells the reader very little about the house. The National Register nom is less informative than the typical NRHP nom, but it has a lot of basic information that I didn't find here. --Orlady (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I have read the nom form in detail and beliecve it or not been to the house on a tour. The only other features, I could see wree those you would find in a real estate ad, fireplaces, exposed wooden beams, plans are to restore the house to its original form, which, I have had some fun with, they want to use clap board as Beckley did, but some other historians and I have discussed this and many want the log cabin, not the clap board. I will look and update some of the physical features.Coal town guy (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Categories: