Misplaced Pages

User talk:Johnny Squeaky: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:53, 28 September 2013 editDoniago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers113,250 editsm sign← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:05, 10 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(162 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Editing against consensus ==
Please note that I do not respond to uncivilized threats from admins or other editors... =//= ] 00:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - ] (]) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Please be particularly aware, ] states:
:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - ] (]) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 04:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
== Discussion page edits ==

When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did . Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did . These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. ]] 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
:Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= ] 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

== AN/I: Community restrictions ==

Hello,

I closed the {{diff2|588759576|Proposal|AN/I discussion}} with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a ] throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at ]. ''']]''' 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

== Your "name"? ==

Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an ] fan? :)

== March 2014 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

==Sockpuppet investigation==
{{Ivmbox
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into ] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at ], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.{{#if:yes|&nbsp;] (]) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)}}
|]
}}
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
{{Tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = ]
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing&#32;for a period of '''indefinite''' for ]{{#if:]|&#32;per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. However, you should read the ] first. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->}}

Latest revision as of 09:05, 10 April 2022

Editing against consensus

This is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Johnny_Squeaky_and_.22Trivia.22 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion page edits

When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did here. Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did here. These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. Tiderolls 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= Johnny Squeaky 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

AN/I: Community restrictions

Hello,

I closed the AN/I discussion with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a one-revert rule throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at WP:AN/I. LFaraone 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your "name"?

Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an opera fan? :)

March 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tanning addiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community. Betty Logan (talk) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)