Misplaced Pages

Objective Individual Combat Weapon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:13, 8 June 2006 editAñoranza (talk | contribs)1,398 edits no propaganda names, please← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:56, 22 June 2024 edit undoHohum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers68,469 edits →See also 
(133 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|US Army rifle development competition}}
:''See ] for more information on that subset of the overall program''
{{no footnotes|date=February 2014}}
]
The '''Objective Individual Combat Weapon''' or '''OICW''' was the next-generation service ] competition that was under development as part of the ] OICW program; the program was eventually discontinued without bringing the weapon out of the prototype phase. The acronym OICW is often used to refer to the entire weapons program.


It was started in the aftermath of the ] (or ACR) during the 1980s. Like the ACR program, it has largely been a failure in terms of achieving the specific program goals (e.g., replacing the ]) and has cost millions of dollars, but has resulted in many innovative weapons and weapon concepts as well as offshoot programs of its own.
]
]
]
]
]

The '''Objective Individual Combat Weapon''' or '''OICW''' refers to the next-generation service ] competition that was under development as part of the ] OICW program. The acronym OICW is often used to refer to the whole program.

It was started in the aftermath of the ] (or ACR) during the ]. Like the ACR program that came before it in the 1980s, it has largely been a failure in terms of achieving the specific program goals (e.g. replacing the M16) and has cost millions of dollars, but has resulted in many innovative weapons and weapon concepts as well as offshoot programs of its own.

==Background of the OICW project==
The history of the one of the most ambitious projects in the history of small arms began late in ], when the ] Infantry School at ] published a military paper named "Small Arms System 2000" (SAS-2000). Despite the then-current trends towards ] and ] ammunition and weapons being developed for the ] program, this paper stated that conventional small arms had already reached their technological peak. It was argued that the only way to increase the hit probability in small arms was to introduce a weapon that combined the ability to fire explosive and fragmentation warheads with smart fusing and sighting/aiming technologies. (See also: ].)

While most small arms research during the late ] in the ] was conducted under the ACR program, the idea first developed in SAS-2000 was supported by another US military paper, published in ] by the US Army ] (Training & Doctrine) center. This paper, called "The Small Arms Master Plan" (SAMP), requested a new family of infantry "Objective" weapons, namely the Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW), Objective Personal Defense Weapon (OPDW), and the Objective Crew Served Weapon (]). The SAMP stated that such weapons must utilize the latest developments in computers and visual technologies, as well as in small arms, and combine both high explosive warheads and traditional bullet firing capabilities in a single weapon that should be fielded circa ]. Of course, the timelines and most of the weight and cost requirements set in this paper looked unrealistic from the start, but the development of the Objective weapons series began in the early ].


==Development== ==Development==
]
The central idea of the program was to develop a rifle that enabled the attacking of targets behind cover by using airburst munitions. The munitions were to be much smaller than pre-existing ] and ], but large enough to be effective. The idea was refined into a combination of a short ] and semi-automatic, low-velocity ] firing air-bursting munitions.
]


The central idea of the program was to develop a rifle that enabled the attacking of targets behind cover by using airburst munitions. The munitions were to be much smaller than pre-existing ] and ], but large enough to be effective. The idea was refined into a combination of a short ] and semi-automatic, low-velocity ] firing air-bursting munitions. The OICW aimed to use advances in computer technology in a weapon that fired grenades automatically pre-set to explode above or beside targets hidden from view. Fragmentation from the exploding grenades could hit the target when normal rifle fire could not.
The winners of the first competition for the project during the 1990s were ATK and firearms manufacturer ] with the ]. They went on to build numerous prototypes of the rifle for the ] military in the late 1990s. These projects centered on using a programmable 20 mm airburst munition-firing rifle by itself or with other projectile-based weapons attached. The 20 mm launcher was analyzed in various configurations, including a launcher by itself, with a 5.56 mm weapon (based on the ]), or with a ] ]. At the time, both those weapons were still in development, with the U.S. effectively indirectly subsidizing two commercial H&K products.


The winners of the first competition for the project during the 1990s were ATK and firearms manufacturer ] with the ]. They went on to build numerous prototypes of the rifle for the ] military in the late 1990s. These projects centered on using a programmable 20 mm airburst munition-firing rifle by itself or with other projectile-based weapons attached. The 20 mm launcher was analyzed in various configurations, including a launcher by itself, with a 5.56 mm weapon (based on the ]), or with a ] ].
By the early 2000s, the weapon had settled on a design and was classified as the XM29. However, the weapon had serious problems - it did not meet weight or cost targets, and the 20 mm smart grenades did not seem to be lethal enough in testing.


By the early 2000s, the weapon had settled on a design and was classified as the XM29. The XM29 was based on the ] (Cal. 18.5×76mm or 12 Gauge non-conventional). However, the weapon had serious problems: it did not meet weight or cost targets, and the 20 mm High Explosive Air Bursting (HEAB) did not seem to be lethal enough in testing. To compound matters, the kinetic-energy component had to be light and short in length. As a result, the ] barrel had a length of only 250 mm (9.8 inches), which is too short to generate enough muzzle velocity to be effective as a standard infantry rifle. It was also too heavy and too large to be operated effectively by a soldier.
This resulted in the army starting development on new weapons, and finally shelving the XM29 in 2004. The kinetic energy component split off into the ] rifle program and the airburst component developed into the ] airburst weapon. According to a presentation by ] ], Chief of the Small Arms Division of the ] at the U.S. Army Infantry Center, there were three main parts to the OICW program.


This resulted in the army starting development on new weapons, and finally shelving the XM29 in 2004. The kinetic energy component split off into the ] program and the airburst component developed into the ] airburst weapon. According to a presentation by ] ], Chief of the Small Arms Division of the ] at the U.S. Army Infantry Center, there were three main parts to the OICW program:
Increment 1 (OICW 1) was a competition for a whole weapon system family similar to the ]. The weapon system was to potentially replace the ], ], ] ] and some M9 pistols. Other arms companies had contended that the OICW project goals had changed enough to warrant another competition. Potential challengers could include a weapons system based on an updated M16, the ], the aforementioned ], and potentially any other manufacturer that fulfilled the Army requirements for participating. It also listed the shotgun being replaced by a modular shotgun system (]) mounted on the OICW 1 winner.


The Increment 1 portion was put on an eight-week hold in July 2005, primarily to take into account input and needs of other services. On October 31, 2005, the OICW I program was cancelled. The reason given for the cancellation was stated as: "This action has been taken in order for the Army to reevaluate its priorities for small caliber weapons, and to incorporate emerging requirements identified during Operation Enduring Freedom and the ]. The Government will also incorporate studies looking into current capability gaps during said reevaluation." * Increment 1 (OICW 1) was a competition for a whole weapon system family similar to the ]. The weapon system was to potentially replace the ], ], ] ] and some ]s. Other ] had contended that the OICW project goals had changed enough to warrant another competition. Potential challengers could include a weapons system based on an updated M16, the ], the ], and potentially any other manufacturer that fulfilled the Army requirements for participating. It also listed the shotgun being replaced by a modular shotgun system (]) mounted on the OICW 1 winner. The Increment 1 portion was put on an eight-week hold in July 2005, primarily to take into account input and needs of other services. On October 31, 2005, the OICW I program was cancelled. The reason given for the cancellation was stated as: "This action has been taken in order for the Army to reevaluate its priorities for small caliber weapons, and to incorporate emerging requirements identified during ] and ]. The Government will also incorporate studies looking into current capability gaps during said reevaluation."
* OICW Increment 2 was a stand-alone airburst weapon the (]). This is a standalone launcher that uses bigger 25 mm munition, and was intended to be a special applications and support weapon, not an individual combat weapon as previous models were. In 2005, the weapon underwent limited field trials and combat testing.
* OICW Increment 3 was the XM29. The M203 was listed as being replaced by a combination of Increments 2 and 3. The M249 was also to be partially replaced by a lightweight MG (LMGA, now LSAT), which was listed as being the successor to the ] and ].


== Related weapons ==
OICW Increment 2 was a stand-alone airburst weapon (the (]). This is a standalone launcher that uses bigger 25 mm munition, and was intended to be a special applications and support weapon, not an individual combat weapon as previous models were. In 2005, the weapon underwent limited field trials and combat testing.
], conceptualized in the late 1990s as the kinetic energy component of the SABR (later XM29); the XM29 was put on hold, but the MP7 entered production in 2001]]

]
OICW Increment 3 was the XM29. The M203 was listed as being replaced by a combination of Increments 2 and 3. The M249 was also to be partially replaced by a lightweight MG (LMGA, now LSAT), which was listed as being the successor to the ] and ].

==Overview of OICW related weapons==
] was conceptualized as the kinetic energy component of the SABR (later XM29); the XM29 was put on hold, but the MP7 entered production in 2001]]


In the aftermath of the ACR program, the OICW program began. There were two main contenders, one design by AAI and its companies, and the other by ATK (with H&K and other companies); ATK and H&K won. In the aftermath of the ACR program, the OICW program began. There were two main contenders, one design by AAI and its companies, and the other by ATK (with H&K and other companies); ATK and H&K won.


OICW concepts/prototypes in the 1990s:
*Original OICW Concept, OICW program targets drafted (circa 1980s/early 1990s)
* 20 mm smart grenade and 5.56 mm rifle in side by side configuration
*OICW concepts/prototypes in 1990s
**20 mm smart grenade and 5.56 mm rifle in side by side configuration * 20 mm smart grenade stand alone unit (XM25)
**20 mm smart grenade stand alone unit * 20 mm smart grenade and ]
**20 mm smart grenade and ] * 20 mm smart grenade and 5.56 mm rifle in over-under configuration (])
**20 mm smart grenade and 5.56 mm rifle in over-under configuration (])

*Program temporarily suspended circa 2004. Restarted with separate 'increments' for different weapons.

*Some weapon programs involved with, stemming from, or using technology from the OICW project
**] (HEAB Ammunition)
**] (5.56 kinetic energy component)
**] (Uses low velocity 25 mm smart airburst munition)
**] (Uses 'high velocity' 25 mm 'dumb' version of smart munition)
**]) (Uses 'high velocity' 25 mm smart airburst munition; autocannon)
***] (.50 BMG version of XM307)
**] (Mk 47 Mod 0) (40 mm automatic grenade launcher capable of using smart 40 mm airburst grenades)
**]
**] (A lightweight shotgun attachment)
**] (40 mm grenade launcher)

]


Some weapon programs involved with, stemming from, or using technology from the OICW project include:
==See also==
Weapons:
*]
*]
*]


* ] (25×40mm HEAB Ammunition)
Programs/Projects:
* ] (5.56 kinetic energy component)
*] (SPIW) (Project SALVO, etc.)
* ] (40 mm grenade launcher originally developed for the XM8)
*]
* ] (Uses low velocity 25×40mm smart airburst munition, semi-automatic standalone grenade launcher)
*]
* ] (Uses high velocity 25×59mm munition, ])
*]
* ] (Uses high velocity 25×59mm smart airburst munition, automatic grenade launcher)
*Australia's ] program
** ] (.50 BMG version of XM307)
* ] (Mk 47 Mod 0) (40 mm automatic grenade launcher capable of using smart 40 mm airburst grenades)
* ]
* ] (A lightweight 12-gauge bolt-action accessory shotgun)


== See also ==
Lists:
*]
*]
*]


* {{lwc|80.002}}
]
* {{lwc|Advanced Individual Combat Weapon}}
* {{lwc|FN F2000}}
* {{lwc|PAPOP}}
* {{lwc|Daewoo K11}}
* {{lwc|Neopup PAW-20}}
* {{lwc|QBZ-03#ZH-05|QTS-11}}
* {{lwc|Special Purpose Individual Weapon}}
* {{lwc|NIVA XM1970}}
* {{lwc|Advanced Combat Rifle}}
* {{lwc|HK CAWS}}
* ]
* ]
* ]


==External links== == External links ==
* *
*http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/oicw.htm *
*
*http://www.ausa.org/www/armymag.nsf/(soldier)/20054?OpenDocument
* *
* {{Dead link|date=April 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
*
*
*
*
*http://procnet.pica.army.mil/dbi/Download/GoGetSourcesSought.cfm?SolNum=W15QKN-05-X-0427
*
*
*
*


] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 21:56, 22 June 2024

US Army rifle development competition
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (February 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
An early XM8 mockup after the break up; became part of OICW Increment 1

The Objective Individual Combat Weapon or OICW was the next-generation service rifle competition that was under development as part of the United States Army OICW program; the program was eventually discontinued without bringing the weapon out of the prototype phase. The acronym OICW is often used to refer to the entire weapons program.

It was started in the aftermath of the Advanced Combat Rifle (or ACR) during the 1980s. Like the ACR program, it has largely been a failure in terms of achieving the specific program goals (e.g., replacing the M16) and has cost millions of dollars, but has resulted in many innovative weapons and weapon concepts as well as offshoot programs of its own.

Development

A working XM25 prototype is tested in 2005; this was part of OICW Increment 2
The final four ACR program test entrants

The central idea of the program was to develop a rifle that enabled the attacking of targets behind cover by using airburst munitions. The munitions were to be much smaller than pre-existing grenades and grenade launchers, but large enough to be effective. The idea was refined into a combination of a short assault rifle and semi-automatic, low-velocity cannon firing air-bursting munitions. The OICW aimed to use advances in computer technology in a weapon that fired grenades automatically pre-set to explode above or beside targets hidden from view. Fragmentation from the exploding grenades could hit the target when normal rifle fire could not.

The winners of the first competition for the project during the 1990s were ATK and firearms manufacturer Heckler & Koch with the XM29 OICW. They went on to build numerous prototypes of the rifle for the United States military in the late 1990s. These projects centered on using a programmable 20 mm airburst munition-firing rifle by itself or with other projectile-based weapons attached. The 20 mm launcher was analyzed in various configurations, including a launcher by itself, with a 5.56 mm weapon (based on the HK G36), or with a MP7 PDW.

By the early 2000s, the weapon had settled on a design and was classified as the XM29. The XM29 was based on the HK CAWS (Close Assault Weapon System) (Cal. 18.5×76mm or 12 Gauge non-conventional). However, the weapon had serious problems: it did not meet weight or cost targets, and the 20 mm High Explosive Air Bursting (HEAB) did not seem to be lethal enough in testing. To compound matters, the kinetic-energy component had to be light and short in length. As a result, the 5.56×45mm NATO barrel had a length of only 250 mm (9.8 inches), which is too short to generate enough muzzle velocity to be effective as a standard infantry rifle. It was also too heavy and too large to be operated effectively by a soldier.

This resulted in the army starting development on new weapons, and finally shelving the XM29 in 2004. The kinetic energy component split off into the XM8 rifle program and the airburst component developed into the XM25 airburst weapon. According to a presentation by Major Kevin Finch, Chief of the Small Arms Division of the Directorate of Combat Developments at the U.S. Army Infantry Center, there were three main parts to the OICW program:

  • Increment 1 (OICW 1) was a competition for a whole weapon system family similar to the XM8. The weapon system was to potentially replace the M4 carbine, M16 rifle, M249 light machine gun and some M9 pistols. Other arms companies had contended that the OICW project goals had changed enough to warrant another competition. Potential challengers could include a weapons system based on an updated M16, the Steyr AUG, the FN SCAR, and potentially any other manufacturer that fulfilled the Army requirements for participating. It also listed the shotgun being replaced by a modular shotgun system (XM26 LSS) mounted on the OICW 1 winner. The Increment 1 portion was put on an eight-week hold in July 2005, primarily to take into account input and needs of other services. On October 31, 2005, the OICW I program was cancelled. The reason given for the cancellation was stated as: "This action has been taken in order for the Army to reevaluate its priorities for small caliber weapons, and to incorporate emerging requirements identified during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. The Government will also incorporate studies looking into current capability gaps during said reevaluation."
  • OICW Increment 2 was a stand-alone airburst weapon the (XM25). This is a standalone launcher that uses bigger 25 mm munition, and was intended to be a special applications and support weapon, not an individual combat weapon as previous models were. In 2005, the weapon underwent limited field trials and combat testing.
  • OICW Increment 3 was the XM29. The M203 was listed as being replaced by a combination of Increments 2 and 3. The M249 was also to be partially replaced by a lightweight MG (LMGA, now LSAT), which was listed as being the successor to the M60 and M240.

Related weapons

The Heckler & Koch MP7, conceptualized in the late 1990s as the kinetic energy component of the SABR (later XM29); the XM29 was put on hold, but the MP7 entered production in 2001
One tester is kneeling with a XM8 Carbine and XM320 attached, the other has the XM8 sharpshooter

In the aftermath of the ACR program, the OICW program began. There were two main contenders, one design by AAI and its companies, and the other by ATK (with H&K and other companies); ATK and H&K won.

OICW concepts/prototypes in the 1990s:

  • 20 mm smart grenade and 5.56 mm rifle in side by side configuration
  • 20 mm smart grenade stand alone unit (XM25)
  • 20 mm smart grenade and MP7
  • 20 mm smart grenade and 5.56 mm rifle in over-under configuration (XM29 OICW)

Some weapon programs involved with, stemming from, or using technology from the OICW project include:

  • XM1018 (25×40mm HEAB Ammunition)
  • XM8 rifle (5.56 kinetic energy component)
  • M320 (40 mm grenade launcher originally developed for the XM8)
  • XM25 (Uses low velocity 25×40mm smart airburst munition, semi-automatic standalone grenade launcher)
  • XM109 (Uses high velocity 25×59mm munition, anti-materiel rifle)
  • XM307 ACSW (Uses high velocity 25×59mm smart airburst munition, automatic grenade launcher)
    • XM312 (.50 BMG version of XM307)
  • Mk 47 (Mk 47 Mod 0) (40 mm automatic grenade launcher capable of using smart 40 mm airburst grenades)
  • Land Warrior
  • XM26 Lightweight Shotgun System (A lightweight 12-gauge bolt-action accessory shotgun)

See also

External links

Categories: