| Revision as of 00:12, 9 June 2006 editLoghead1 (talk | contribs)463 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:40, 24 June 2024 edit undo48JCL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,068 edits Notification: listing of Misplaced Pages:FM at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (233 intermediate revisions by 89 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] 21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] 21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Re: your reverts to CIVI, CFPL, CKNX, CHRO, and CHWI== | |||
| Ardenn, recently you reverted a useful edit by ] in the article on ]. Following up on that change, I noticed that you had in fact proceeded to bulk-revert all of that same editor's additions to five different A-Channel stations. While you are correct in stating that the sale of CHUM assets to Bell hasn't completed yet, it does not invalidate the information about the sale. Those edits were relevant to the respective articles, and should not have been removed ''en masse''. Please use caution in future before pursuing such actions. Thanks! --] 04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please stop the unnecessary reverts on these pages. There is no need to undo this editor's work. Thank you. --] 04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::''"The sale of CHUM is irrelevant to the individual stations. The only article it belongs in is perhaps the main A-Channel and CHUM articles. I will revert it, because of the above."(Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| == ] closed == | |||
| ::It is definitely relevant to the individual stations, as they are directly affected by this change. Trust me, as someone who has worked in media for the better part of two decades, "who owns you" is '''very''' relevant. Besides, you're now continually reverting information that two editors (at least) agree is important. The proper course of action would be to discuss the issue on a talk page, probably at ] (or somewhere similar). Cheers. --] 04:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This arbitration case is closed. | |||
| :::Pursuant to this discussion (and to stop it from degenerating) I'm posting a note at ] to initiate a discussion about this information. Hopefully, that will help to resolve things. Cheers. --] | |||
| Monicasdude is placed on standard civility parole for one year. If he makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then he may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat offenses. Monicasdude is banned from making edits related to the deletion process (excepting obvious vandalism and copyright problems) for one year. This is to be interpreted broadly, and includes, but is not limited to, commenting on ] nominations and removals of nominations for ] and ]. He may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat offenses. After 5 such blocks, the maximum block time is increased to a year. | |||
| ::::''"The other guy doesn't count. He's not registered. For all I know, he's you." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| Should Monicasdude violate any ban imposed by this decision he may be briefly blocked, up to a week for repeat offenses. After 5 such blocks, the maximum block time is increased to a year. All blocks to be logged at ]. | |||
| ::::Please, Ardenn, don't do this. Let's resolve this peacefully, okay? --] 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::''"In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, --] ] 08:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I've no interest in playing games with Wiki rules, Ardenn. I've asked - quite nicely, I think - that we take this to a discussion. What do you have against that course of action? --] 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::''"I'll agree that who owns you is important, but the transaction isn't complete. Right now, it's only speculation. The CRTC may say no." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| == Page blanked == | |||
| :::::"Speculation" is a bit of an understatement - yes, the CRTC may overturn the deal, but it probably will go through in some form. Regardless of the outcome, however, just the fact that the deal is pending is of direct relevance to each and every station. Furthermore, someone reading up on their local station may not click through to the main articles - but they still could stand to know about what is proposed. --] 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello - you may have missed it, but you deleted many of the comments on the ] when you added your "off topic" template. I've restored the comments, and then restored your template edit. Cheers. --] 08:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I've posted a request for comment ] and a call for discussion ] to get some outside input on this matter. I would appreciate it if you could hold off on resuming your reversions to these articles so that there is sufficient time to allow people to comment. This is, I feel, a reasonable request. Thank you. --] 05:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Favour: ] == | |||
| <nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki> | |||
| Can I ask a favour, please? Some fans (and possibly some of the creators) of ] podcast are apparently convinced I'm out to destry 'their' article - presumably because I put a POV template on the article and pointed out some of the POV issues on the ]. At this point, I expect any changes I may try make to result in an edit war and personal attacks on me, so having another editor review the article would be ''very'' useful, I figure. Thanks. —] 19:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Help me== | |||
| :Thanks for helping out! —] 19:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| See ] -- ] <small>]</small> 05:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for your help. He didn't even have the decency to let me know about the block. <span style="border: 1px solid green;">]</span> 05:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. -- ] <small>]</small> 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me. <span style="border: 1px solid green;">]</span> 05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I will e-mail Tawker -- ] <small>]</small> 05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look -- ] 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked. <span style="border: 1px solid green;">]</span> 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Forgive me if I over-estimated you in assuming that you would read the block message, I figured the block reason would say plenty.... you know, it is there for a reason... it shouldn't be critical to have a talk page message saying the exact same -- ] 07:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==CCOTW heads up== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Since ] will be the August ] I hope You'll read the comments in the nomination and as a nominator prepare to co-ordinate the effort. ] 21:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==You quitting Misplaced Pages..== | |||
| I'm sorry to have to disagree with you on the POV vs. NPOV status of calling the party "eco-capitalist". The use of the term is controversial and is not endorsed by the party, so should be in a "Controversies" section in the article. I, personally, come from a more anti-capitalist background, so have never been happy about the accusations of the party being right-wing. (I'm also not happy with the accusations of it being left-wing because I tend not to agree with narrow ideological frameworks like the uni-dimensional traditional poltical spectrum.) (BTW, anti-capitalist does not mean pro-socialist. I prefer to avoid ideologies altogether.) —] 05:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I personally won't beg you to stay, only ask you to stay. You are not contributing by just saying "Well..ok fine, I'm gone". If something doesn't please you, well, help contributing to Misplaced Pages by finding solutions. --] 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :As an aside, I've noticed that the quit message has been in place for a week, but you're still editing. You may wish to remove the quit message or edit it to provide a cutoff date to reflect your change in status. Happy editing! ] * ] 19:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Gandi.net== | |||
| Although it seems that you have alreadly retired from Misplaced Pages, I post this message because you were the person virtually removed the article ]. If you want to delete the article, try ] instead. | |||
| --]] 16:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Meh== | ||
| The wikibreak was actually due to the fact that I was out of broadband range on this weird thing called a vacation. The entire media stink (and man was it elevated way higher than it needed to be) came later. I know, I'm the most unjust crazy rogue admin out there for doing a username block... oh well, all in a day :) - Thanks for the reminder to take down the wikibreak sign, I had totally forgotten about it :) -- ] 00:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==IMPORTANT== | |||
| ]Hi {{PAGENAME}}, | |||
| Queens University has been nominated for collaboration of the week and artcle improvement drive please help out!! --] 19:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==I Quit== | |||
| Thank you for any constructive criticism you may have given in my recent unsuccesful RFA. I will strive to overcome any shortcomings you may have mentioned & will try & prove myself worthy of your vote in the future. | |||
| I've noticed you have posted a dozen or so edits since you quit. Perhaps you should unquit.] 02:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :None of Ardenn's edits have been since the 14th of August, and then only very, very minor. Many users will perform a few edits to finish up a few things once and for all before leaving the project. For all intents and purposes, Ardenn has left the project. ] * ] 05:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your edit to User talk:209.17.148.143== | |||
| Cheers | |||
| Hello Ardenn, thank you for the invitation you gave me about creating an account. However, I already have an account and forgot to sign in at that time. Thank you, anyways! ] 16:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==I wonder what happened== | |||
| <b>]<font color="green">]</font>]</b><sup>'''<span style="color:#800080">(</span>'''] ¦ ]'''<span style="color:#800080">)</span>'''</sup>'' 10:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Ardenn. I find your name from reading about it on Wikitruth's article on Misplaced Pages's article about them. I really like your orange disclaimer so I'm going to use it for my talk page if that's okay, but I'll take it down if you tell me to. I'm sorry to hear about your dropping out of Misplaced Pages, it's really something I wish the whole world would get in on doing. I understand it must suck getting harassed for your decisions. I still need to read more about the occurances to figure out just exactly what they were and whether or not they're right, but still, you look okay enough. ] 19:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :To satisfy your curiosity: Based on my review of his contribution history and my own memories of following the dispute, Ardenn left Misplaced Pages after being blocked numerous times for violations of the 3RR rule, which was in keeping with a generally mutually hostile relationship with the Misplaced Pages community at large. There was also a long and tendentious dispute between Ardenn and WCityMike, which was one of many factors that led to that contributor's choice to leave the project. Ardenn's relationship with the community was a stormy one, and it appears that he has wrapped up the dangling threads of his participation and permanently left the project (or reregistered as a new user). As for the disclaimer, remember that automatically deleting posts from anonymous users is an egregious violation of Misplaced Pages's policy of ], which includes anonymous contributors; I caution you in the strongest of terms to avoid implementing that particular clause of the notice. Anyway, I think it would be best if we all just let Ardenn slip away quietly; while I don't think the Right to Vanish applies due to the extensive block log, it would be nice to adhere to the spirit of the policy. ] * ] 02:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It's very sad that someone pushed this user this far, to quit Misplaced Pages. --] 02:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Libby Davies== | |||
| Please see ]. - ] 16:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:L-chapman.jpg == | |||
| == Recent oppose votes in RFAs == | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
| # Go to ] and edit it to add {{]}} | |||
| # On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 20:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! While I understand you are angry at administrators and that you don't agree with policies like ], I also believe you may be failing at one of the basic points of Misplaced Pages: ]. By constantly voting negatively because there is no way to remove administrators (which is not correct, by the way), it is my belief that you are not assuming good faith in their future behaviour. Administrators should be chosen because of what they have done, not what they may do in the future. As already stated in some RFAs, that is not the place for complaining. I am not asking you to stop voting negatively if you feel like that, but instead to also reach the formal channels, as probably nobody will do it unless ]. Just an advice from a third party. -- ] 22:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| '''NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT''' the scope of ] is being . Your input is requested. Thank you. ] 20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Deaf == | |||
| You have given me an NPA warning? Wow! Pretty feeble response. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]/]</small> 03:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I notice you are a member of WikiProject Deaf. You may also add {{tl|User WikiProject Deaf}}, which also adds a userbox to your page, or ]]] to your userpage. If you do, it will list you in ]. ] 20:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I added you to ]. ] 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Erik Eastaugh== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I have renominated this for deletion. I notice you voted against last time. If you have any views one way or another, please post them. It appears like it will be a clear deletion anyway. Cheers. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == TfD nomination of ] == | |||
| What are you doing? Why are you revert warring on somone's talk page? ] | ] 00:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — ] <small>(] • ])</small> 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| == 3RR on ] == | |||
| Hi..how are you? i saw at your main page..that you left wikipedia!..what is the proplem?..i Knew that is not my business.but if you want to tell me,it will be good? regards.--] (]) 11:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ]You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. <!-- Template:3RR3 --> Difs: <span class="plainlinks"><font color="green">]</font>] <small>(] • ] • )</span></small> 00:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of List of Ryerson University people== | |||
| == ] and ] == | |||
| I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <small>'''TRAVELLINGCARI'''</small>'''<sup>]</sup>'''<sub>]</sub> 20:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of Category:You Can't Do That on Television== | |||
| Hi, Ardenn, this is ], whose additions to ] you have been reverting, per the ]. Now, I am new here, so I confess that I may be doing something wrong. However, having read the Crystal Ball policy several times now, as well as made an un-responded-to entry in ST XI's Talk page, and a lengthy question/objection in my edit notes (which was answered rather glibly, you must admit), I still do not understand how the paragraph on movie-related rumors in any way violates the CB policy, or indeed any ''other'' Wikipedian policy. | |||
| ]''']''', which you created, has been nominated for ], ], or ]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. – ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 00:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The rumors I listed are all relevant to the movie; the movie itself is an "individual scheduled or expected future event" that is "notable and almost certain to take place". None of the rumors listed are "extrapolation, speculation, or... original research". They are all cited, noteworthy, and relevant to the article's main topic. To the Trekkie community, every word about the movie spoken by anyone of import is a topic instantly worthy of pages of discussion; only the most relevant of these rumors were added to the page, while, for instance, ]'s speculation of last week was left out. None of the rumors are written as "advertising". They conform closely to the NPOV rules. I simply do not understand your use of this rule to remove the rumor section. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Finally, you cited some sort of policy that "Misplaced Pages is not a rumor mill." Neither this policy nor anything similar are present on the page to which you linked. A ] search turned up nothing. Would you care to point me in the direction of this rule? Or was this citation an oversight on your part? | |||
| You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the ] ]. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visit ] and move your name over to the ] list. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on the ]. Thank you for your time. ]] 08:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of ]== | |||
| Assuming I don't find some rule to the contrary, I will revert the article in one week unless I hear from you. Thank you. ] 05:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have nominated {{lc|Green politicians in Canada}} for renaming to {{lc|Green Party politicians in Canada}}. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) - 19:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for File:Lgibbons.jpg== | |||
| == New Guy Question == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 11:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. You gave me an introduction post on my talk page, so I figured I'd ask you this. On my page, I have a few "User is..." blocks that I've found on other pages. Is there a place to find a list of all of them? Thanks. ] 23:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| * Thanks a bunch for the help, man. Now all I need to do is find a formatting template Wikipage. Know of any? ] 17:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello Ardenn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Gabriel Draven}}</small> | |||
| ==Meat puppetry== | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Al Bowers}}</small> | |||
| Would appreciate if you would put the meatpuppet info on the user talk pages as opposed to the Queen's talk page. Thanks -- ] <small>]</small> 00:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 04:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :And also, I'm aware of WP:AGF. No need to remind me on my talk page. Thanks. -- ] <small>]</small> 00:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Non-free rationale for File:NickWright.jpg== | |||
| ::Fair enough. I've got my eye on the article also. I think the traditions section should probably be toned down a bit and will state that on the talk page. Regards -- ] <small>]</small> 00:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| You are being overly agressive. Put a meatpuppet warning on someones talk page when they haven't actually done anthing is bullying. You need to stop using policy tags as weapons. ] | ] 05:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Healthcare in Ottawa== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 02:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Response to your comment == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I have reread ] per your advice. I do not wish to make this a major issue, but one line in particular from ] stands out as relevant: ''"Of course, there's a difference between assuming good faith and ignoring bad actions. If you expect people to assume good faith from you, make sure you demonstrate it. Don't put the burden on others. Yelling "Assume Good Faith" at people does not excuse you from explaining your actions, and making a habit of it will convince people that you're acting in bad faith."'' Thank you for your comment. <span style="font-size:90%;">—'''<font color="sandybrown">]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="cornflowerblue">]</font>'''</span><sup><font color="olivedrab">]</font>|<font color="steelblue">]</font></sup><span style="font-size:85%;">, ], ] ] @ 01:21 ]</span>''' | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks muchly== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 --> | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| Thanks very much for the barnstar. It is wonderful to get recognition once in a while! It doesn't happen as often on Misplaced Pages as it should. Regards, ] | ] 02:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| == Making ] on RfA pages == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24#Misplaced Pages:FM}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]] 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Please stop making a point about the RfA process in general on RfA pages, if you want to discuss the fact that we need no more admins please do it on the RfA talk page and not the RfA pages. Thank you -- ] 05:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Template:Canadian mobile phone companies == | |||
| * Is ] even sold at Canadian 7-11's? --] 18:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ** Thank you for your response ]. I stand corrected! I apologize in advance if I am not following the correct format, as I am still new to ]. --] 18:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Apology Accepted== | |||
| It takes a big person to apologize and admit that they were wrong, so I accept your apology. Hopefully we can work together in the future rather than bicker needlessly. Cheers! | |||
| ] 02:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ditto== | |||
| I too accept your apology. Thanks | |||
| ] 16:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Question about copyvio == | |||
| When I place the copyvio tag in an article, do I also blank the previous content of the article, or does an administrator blank it once my copyvio tag submission has been reviewed? My question comes from the comment you left , and the fact that placing the {{tl|copyvio}} tag doesn't mention blanking the content. Thanks! --] 01:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == University of Alberta == | |||
| *Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> - ] 01:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <br> | |||
| I don't appreciate your baseless accusations, especially considering I was simply following proper process. Not to mention that yelling at neutral parties is probably not the best idea. | |||
| # I'm not being a nag, I'm using the warning templates to remind you that you are one edit away from violating 3RR. I don't doubt that you know the rule, but the template still needs to be given to you regardless. | |||
| #No I'm not wikistalking you, and I resent the fact that you assume as much. For someone who is accusing others of not ], you are very quick to jump to conclusions yourself. I'll have you know that I have most of the big Canadian Universities on my watch list and although in the case of the current conflict regarding the Infobox on the U of A page I happen to agree with you, I have warned both you and the other user involved to avoid 3RR. Next time, I'd appreciate it if you didn't accuse me of breaking rules with no cause. - ] 01:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| I am very new and still learning- thanks for the agreement with the hospital article and the comment about my user and talk pages being mixed up. ] 01:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Chief Dental Officer== | |||
| Why do you think that the Chief Dental Officer is not an important article? It is a federal position in the Canadian government. I'm sure that if the government created a position for it, it is important. And how is the information not verifiable, if you click on the link below you will see all the information about the CDO. I just wanted to clear up these questions. ] 04:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Merci beaucoup! == | |||
| {| style="border-top:1px solid grey; border-right:1px solid grey; border-bottom:2px solid grey; border-left:1px solid grey; background-color:#ffcc00; font-family:Verdana; font-size: 12px;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |<font color = "red">'''Thank you,{{PAGENAME}}!'''</font><br><font color = "navy">Thank you for voting for my recent ], which passed (to my extreme surprise and shock) with a total tally of 66/15/2. Although you didn't give me a support vote, I would nevertheless like to thank you for your helpful comments and offer a helping hand in any ]-related tasks that may be required -- it's as simple as leaving a message on my ]. Thanks again! -→]]/] 22:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for ]== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under ] but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. | |||
| Please go to ] and edit it to include a fair use rationale. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. | |||
| This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 23:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| We've both tried to get this prod-ed and the author has removed the tags but not added significant content. | |||
| I see that you added a "wikipedia is not a directory" but somehow that doesn't appear in the article anymore. | |||
| Should we AfD this? ] 11:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Use of ] == | |||
| The ] appears on most Green Party articles that I'm aware of on WP (including small provincial parties). If you don't think that is appropriate, please post your reason(s) and recommendations on the ]. Thanks! —] 21:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Welcome Message == | |||
| Thanks. ] 19:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Regarding Sock Puppeting== | |||
| I have a few questions about sock puppeting, because I saw the signs you had put on FruitsAndVegetables133. What would happen if something happened, and I couldn't open my account, or something, and I decided to get a new one. Would that be considered sock puppeting? | |||
| ] | |||
| == Date link == | |||
| I don't understand your comment. Can you explain further? --] 14:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I didn't know it did that. Based on the help text, shouldn't the year also be linked, ie. ], ]? --] 15:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) ] 01:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| YOU KEEP REMOVING ITEMS FRROM YOUR TALK PAGE!!!!! OH GOD!!!!! OH THE INJUSTICE!!!!!!!!!] 01:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Oh, and its ok for you to screw around with people's comments on YOUR page, but on MINE, you become the Wiki-gestapo????] 01:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Amherst5282 will no longer be an issue == | |||
| We have sent a clear message which will be strictly enforced. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to serve the Wiki-community.] 02:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| He or she has been informed that they are to cancel their user account and any further attempt an contributing to any article will be deleted.] 07:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your contributions to our talk page. However, we do not appreciate unfounded accusations that we are a "sockpuppet." Misplaced Pages policies on personal attacks are located at ], please familiarize yourself with them. Such attacks constitute vandalism (see ]) and will not be tolerated. Amherst5282 has been eliminated and his or her future presence on Misplaced Pages will be expunged should he or she attempt to continue contributing (see ]), given the history of valueless and non-useful contributions in the past. We are pleased that you rejoice with us in this conclusion of the affair.] 20:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Familiarize yourself with ]. These guidelines do not permit accusing other Misplaced Pages editors of being sockpuppets, particularly when no evidence is educed to support this accusation.] 20:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please Answer Quickly== | |||
| Dear Ardenn, | |||
| I sent you a message a few days ago about sockpuppetry. Then, I found out that I was convicted of sockpuppetry for FruitsAndVegetables133. I have only used Loghead1. FruitsAndVegetables133 is in fact my friend, though, and I have been in contact with him. Do you think that maybe he got onto mine? | |||
| I definately do not know how this happened, and I am quite offended. Could there also be a problem with my computer?? I am really sorry about this, I never would have meant for any of this to happen, or for people to convict me. I just asked about sock puppetry becuause I saw it on FruitsAndVegetables133, which I go onto to see about sockpuppetry. | |||
| I saw a paragraph on my user page as well, if you want to read it go to ]. | |||
| --Regarding The Paragraph-- | |||
| Also, as it states in the paragraph, it says that I had edited Eburn Ontario. I have edited a place called EMBRUN, Ontario, but never one called Eburn Ontario. | |||
| As it also states in the paragraph that FruitsAndVegetables133, and I both seem to work on similar articles. This is true. I work on a wikiproject with him, as also, I work on Embrun, Ontario, because as I said earlier, we are friends, and I have contact with him. | |||
| I mainly work on the Embrun, Ontario one. I also look at some of the other ones, and read them for my personal enjoyment. | |||
| Thank you for reading my message, and I would really appreciate it if you got back to me as soon as possible. | |||
| Thank you, | |||
| ] | |||
| ] 00:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 24 June 2024
Read BEFORE Posting:
- Vandalism and other offensive commentary/trolling will be deleted expeditiously.
- If you want me to respond/take your comments seriously, sign them with ~~~~.
- Be sure to be signed in. Anonymous users will have their messages deleted without comment.
- I will respond on your talk page, but I will not return to your talk page after that unless you've responded on my talk page. Sounds convoluted, but I'd rather be editing articles than reading your talk page.
- Add your comments to the bottom of the page.
- If you don't agree with a change that I've made to an article, please let me know nicely and I will address the issue.
Welcome!
Hello, Ardenn, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist 21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Re: your reverts to CIVI, CFPL, CKNX, CHRO, and CHWI
Ardenn, recently you reverted a useful edit by 72.60.128.187 in the article on CIVI-TV. Following up on that change, I noticed that you had in fact proceeded to bulk-revert all of that same editor's additions to five different A-Channel stations. While you are correct in stating that the sale of CHUM assets to Bell hasn't completed yet, it does not invalidate the information about the sale. Those edits were relevant to the respective articles, and should not have been removed en masse. Please use caution in future before pursuing such actions. Thanks! --Ckatz 04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop the unnecessary reverts on these pages. There is no need to undo this editor's work. Thank you. --Ckatz 04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "The sale of CHUM is irrelevant to the individual stations. The only article it belongs in is perhaps the main A-Channel and CHUM articles. I will revert it, because of the above."(Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- It is definitely relevant to the individual stations, as they are directly affected by this change. Trust me, as someone who has worked in media for the better part of two decades, "who owns you" is very relevant. Besides, you're now continually reverting information that two editors (at least) agree is important. The proper course of action would be to discuss the issue on a talk page, probably at A-Channel (or somewhere similar). Cheers. --Ckatz 04:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "The other guy doesn't count. He's not registered. For all I know, he's you." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- Please, Ardenn, don't do this. Let's resolve this peacefully, okay? --Ckatz 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- I've no interest in playing games with Wiki rules, Ardenn. I've asked - quite nicely, I think - that we take this to a discussion. What do you have against that course of action? --Ckatz 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "I'll agree that who owns you is important, but the transaction isn't complete. Right now, it's only speculation. The CRTC may say no." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- "Speculation" is a bit of an understatement - yes, the CRTC may overturn the deal, but it probably will go through in some form. Regardless of the outcome, however, just the fact that the deal is pending is of direct relevance to each and every station. Furthermore, someone reading up on their local station may not click through to the main articles - but they still could stand to know about what is proposed. --Ckatz 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've posted a request for comment here and a call for discussion here to get some outside input on this matter. I would appreciate it if you could hold off on resuming your reversions to these articles so that there is sufficient time to allow people to comment. This is, I feel, a reasonable request. Thank you. --Ckatz 05:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Help me
See User talk:Tawker -- Samir धर्म 05:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. He didn't even have the decency to let me know about the block. Ardenn 05:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. -- Samir धर्म 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me. Ardenn 05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I will e-mail Tawker -- Samir धर्म 05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look -- Tawker 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked. Ardenn 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Forgive me if I over-estimated you in assuming that you would read the block message, I figured the block reason would say plenty.... you know, it is there for a reason... it shouldn't be critical to have a talk page message saying the exact same -- Tawker 07:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked. Ardenn 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look -- Tawker 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I will e-mail Tawker -- Samir धर्म 05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me. Ardenn 05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. -- Samir धर्म 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
CCOTW heads up
Since Flag of Canada will be the August Canada collaboration I hope You'll read the comments in the nomination and as a nominator prepare to co-ordinate the effort. feydey 21:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
You quitting Misplaced Pages..
I personally won't beg you to stay, only ask you to stay. You are not contributing by just saying "Well..ok fine, I'm gone". If something doesn't please you, well, help contributing to Misplaced Pages by finding solutions. --Deenoe 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- As an aside, I've noticed that the quit message has been in place for a week, but you're still editing. You may wish to remove the quit message or edit it to provide a cutoff date to reflect your change in status. Happy editing! Captainktainer * Talk 19:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Gandi.net
Although it seems that you have alreadly retired from Misplaced Pages, I post this message because you were the person virtually removed the article Gandi. If you want to delete the article, try Misplaced Pages:AFD instead. --16 16:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Meh
The wikibreak was actually due to the fact that I was out of broadband range on this weird thing called a vacation. The entire media stink (and man was it elevated way higher than it needed to be) came later. I know, I'm the most unjust crazy rogue admin out there for doing a username block... oh well, all in a day :) - Thanks for the reminder to take down the wikibreak sign, I had totally forgotten about it :) -- Tawker 00:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
IMPORTANT
Queens University has been nominated for collaboration of the week and artcle improvement drive please help out!! --Speedystickd 19:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I Quit
I've noticed you have posted a dozen or so edits since you quit. Perhaps you should unquit.JEdward 02:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- None of Ardenn's edits have been since the 14th of August, and then only very, very minor. Many users will perform a few edits to finish up a few things once and for all before leaving the project. For all intents and purposes, Ardenn has left the project. Captainktainer * Talk 05:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to User talk:209.17.148.143
Hello Ardenn, thank you for the invitation you gave me about creating an account. However, I already have an account and forgot to sign in at that time. Thank you, anyways! Sir Studieselot 16:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I wonder what happened
Hello Ardenn. I find your name from reading about it on Wikitruth's article on Misplaced Pages's article about them. I really like your orange disclaimer so I'm going to use it for my talk page if that's okay, but I'll take it down if you tell me to. I'm sorry to hear about your dropping out of Misplaced Pages, it's really something I wish the whole world would get in on doing. I understand it must suck getting harassed for your decisions. I still need to read more about the occurances to figure out just exactly what they were and whether or not they're right, but still, you look okay enough. Tyciol 19:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- To satisfy your curiosity: Based on my review of his contribution history and my own memories of following the dispute, Ardenn left Misplaced Pages after being blocked numerous times for violations of the 3RR rule, which was in keeping with a generally mutually hostile relationship with the Misplaced Pages community at large. There was also a long and tendentious dispute between Ardenn and WCityMike, which was one of many factors that led to that contributor's choice to leave the project. Ardenn's relationship with the community was a stormy one, and it appears that he has wrapped up the dangling threads of his participation and permanently left the project (or reregistered as a new user). As for the disclaimer, remember that automatically deleting posts from anonymous users is an egregious violation of Misplaced Pages's policy of assuming good faith, which includes anonymous contributors; I caution you in the strongest of terms to avoid implementing that particular clause of the notice. Anyway, I think it would be best if we all just let Ardenn slip away quietly; while I don't think the Right to Vanish applies due to the extensive block log, it would be nice to adhere to the spirit of the policy. Captainktainer * Talk 02:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
It's very sad that someone pushed this user this far, to quit Misplaced Pages. --66.218.12.217 02:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:L-chapman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:L-chapman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell 20:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Notice
NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT the scope of WikiProject Ottawa is being debated. Your input is requested. Thank you. GreenJoe 20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Deaf
I notice you are a member of WikiProject Deaf. You may also add {{User WikiProject Deaf}}, which also adds a userbox to your page, or ] to your userpage. If you do, it will list you in Category:WikiProject Deaf participants. Taric25 20:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I added you to Category:WikiProject Deaf participants. Taric25 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Erik Eastaugh
I have renominated this for deletion. I notice you voted against last time. If you have any views one way or another, please post them. It appears like it will be a clear deletion anyway. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:PPAP
Template:PPAP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Hi..how are you? i saw at your main page..that you left wikipedia!..what is the proplem?..i Knew that is not my business.but if you want to tell me,it will be good? regards.--O.waqfi (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Ryerson University people
I have nominated List of Ryerson University people, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Ryerson University people. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARITell me yours 20:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:You Can't Do That on Television
Category:You Can't Do That on Television, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon 00:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Vancouver
You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Vancouver Inactive list. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visit Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Vancouver/Inactive and move your name over to the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Vancouver/Members list. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on the talk page. Thank you for your time. Mkdw 08:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Green politicians in Canada
I have nominated Category:Green politicians in Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Green Party politicians in Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Lgibbons.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lgibbons.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ardenn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Gabriel Draven - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Al Bowers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:NickWright.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NickWright.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Category:Healthcare in Ottawa
Category:Healthcare in Ottawa, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Karl.brown (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:PPAP-Join
Template:PPAP-Join has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:FM" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:FM has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24 § Misplaced Pages:FM until a consensus is reached. 48JCL 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)