Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rusted AutoParts: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:35, 8 October 2013 editYngvadottir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users50,689 edits AfD notice: List of Channel Awesome shows← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:06, 9 January 2025 edit undoFireflyBot (talk | contribs)Bots328,585 edits (BOT) Notification of potential CSD G13 nomination of Draft:Ball and Chain (upcoming film) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
''"All of civility depends on being able to contain the rage of individuals"'' - ].<br>(Please keep civil, no profanity and please sign your comment).
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Rusted AutoParts/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=2160|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}

== Piece of advice == == A barnstar for you ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]| ]}}
I don't think she's going to let up with the mocking and I'm feeling pretty disillusioned right now so I doubt that admins are going to do anything about it seeing as how you've been given warnings for incivility while her attitude has been left to ride. My advice? Step away from the whole mess for now. I know you're trying to patch things up so that the content can be worked on (anyone with a modicum of reading comprehension skills can see that). But I think it's going to (extremely unfairly) dig a hole for you instead of accomplishing your goal. Find some other pages to work on for now and let the Buffy pages ride. While there are some GAs and FAs in the bunch, a fair amount of them have been cruft for a long time now. A little while longer isn't going to hurt. But I think you have a lot to offer and don't want to see you get ridden out by overzealous admins who refuse to read the history that led to your (understandable) defensiveness. Am I making any sense? I'm pretty frelling angry at how all of this is shaking out so I may not be. ] (]) 13:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

:And for the record, I wouldn't have guessed you were only 17 from how you write in general around the site. I say this as a chick old enough to be your (very young) mother (I'm 35). If the conversation hadn't gotten so heated that I started checking editor talk pages to fill in the gaps, I'd never have had a clue. You come off much better than some of the supposed grown ups my age and older around here. So ignore all of the agist BS getting thrown your way; it's totally unwarranted. ] (]) 13:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Ditto. While I think you originally handled this in a suboptimal manner and I wish you hadn't risen to the bait thrown at you, you certainly didn't deserve the treatment you received either, and I do believe your changes were well-meaning. I'm doing what I can to repair the situation while avoiding my apparently non-productive involvement with the actual project at this time. While I'm sure this must have tarnished your opinion of Misplaced Pages, I do hope that you'll stick around...and frankly, I care a lot more about the quality of one's contributions to the project than how old they are or how long they've been here. Chin up. ] (]) 14:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

== WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 15:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0192 -->

== Re: The Princess Bride ==

{{talkback|Erik|The Princess Bride}}
] (] &#124; ]) 00:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

== Tb ==

{{Tb|MichaelQSchmidt#The Lone Ranger}}

== Re: Star Trek 2 ==

{{Talkback|Robsinden|Star Trek 2}}

== Apollo 13 (film) ==

Hi RAP, I've had to quick fail the nomination at ] due to referencing issues. If you want some ideas for expansion/improvement, feel free to contact me. ] (]) 03:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

== Template:Alien ==

I'm just going to hit the highlights since any long discusion should wind up on the template talk page.

Standing consensus regarding biographies is that:
#People are not categorized by employer or projects they have contributed to.
#They are also not included in navigation boxes for an employer or specific projects. This is especially true with actors and filmmakers.
Both of these are to prevent bloating in the footer of the article where prolific people can wind up with dozens of templates and categories making both worthless.

There are exceptions out there, but they tend to be few ''and'' they generally have tight limits on who gets added to the templates. But even then you wind up with something like the collapsed mess at ].

There might, ''might'', be good reason to add in the creators of the the two franchise. But not each director, screenwriter, producer, etc. And definitely not the actors.

- ] (]) 20:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

{{Talkback|J Greb|Template}}
== Deletion discussion about ] ==
Hello, Rusted AutoParts, and thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at ] whether the article Paradise Lost (2012 film) should be in Misplaced Pages. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Paradise Lost (2012 film), which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the ].

Thanks again for your contributions! {{z82}} <small>]</small>] 18:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

== RFA thank you ==

Thank you for your comment and support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, ''']''' '']'' 21:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

== ] November 2011 Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 22:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0207 -->
==License tagging for File:PMDA.jpg==
Thanks for uploading ]. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of ] to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from ], click on ], then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on ]. Thank you for your cooperation.<!-- User:OrphanBot/untagged-new --> --] (]) 16:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

==Orphaned non-free image File:Sophia, Zombie.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 06:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

== Conduct ==

Rather than go around littering every single talk page, I thought it best to bring this discussion somewhere more appropriate. I must admit I am not impressed by the way you have acted towards me, and hope that we can find some kind of resolution. You have accused me of a lot of things, none of which are true, and you seem to be trying to undermine my integrity as an editor. Warning people on their talk pages of things I might do to "their" articles is really the last straw.

At risk of repeating myself, I would invite you to re-read the guidelines at ] and ] and suggest that you only introduce articles for future films when they are in fact notable. This would avoid the frustration you may feel when other experienced and conscientious editors try to redirect these or nominate them for deletion. No-one is picking on you, just the articles. You may want to consider re-reading ] as well. You shouldn't feel protective over the articles. I know you're creating them in good faith.

I am not going around, as you have accused me of more than once, looking for articles to delete. However, from time to time, I do monitor certain things, and if I find vandalism, I will revert it, and sometimes, if I find articles that go against guidelines, I will try to fix this too.

You seem to want to disregard guidelines, saying that they are "just guidelines". Whilst this is true to some extent, they are here for a reason. They have been discussed and agreed upon by other editors, and consensus has been found. Therefore they are a good marker of common consensus and, whilst they should be treated with common sense, they should be, for the most part followed, as they distil the essence of other policies and guidelines, as well as the opinions of other editors. Of course, it is not always practical to follow them, but when it is, I believe this is the best course of action.

I'm sorry I had to bring this here, but I cannot let the way you have been acting towards and about me continue. Please do not assume bad faith. You seem to want to discredit me and make me into some kind of monster. I'm not - I'm just acting, like we all are, to make Misplaced Pages a better and more encyclopedic place. Sometimes different editors have differing opinions of what that is, but again, that is why we have guidelines to follow.

You know, we'd probably get on in real life. Have a good weekend! --] (]) 17:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
:Well, i do act sometimes as if i own the articles, but that's really not why i get upset. When i created the ''Star Trek 2'' article, it took me '''3''' hours of digging into the underbellies of the internet to source every last statement in the article so it be accurate. That's when i lose my cool. ] only annoys me because of that one part. When i create an article, i create it so over time it can flourish, rather than the day it begins filming, scramble to throw together a quick, half-assed article. As shown, the likes of '']'' and currently ''Star Trek 2'' has been a frequently contributed to set of articles. Due to a one month premature creation, they could one day be featured articles or GA. And you're right, we could probably get along in real life. ] (]) 17:50 9 December 2011 (UTC)
:: I can understand that frustration. When I redirected the Star Trek article, I'm sure I copied across the text though... That's what I mean about developing the articles on the subject matter page - that way the article can be developed until it's notable in its own right and there's no risk of people (like me!) coming along and nominating for deletion. I remember talk of a Godzilla film and the article survived a couple of AfDs and still hasn't seen the light of day - that's the kind of thing that shouldn't be on here. Eventually there was consensus to have that merged to the ] page. --I'm sure that won't be the case with ''Star Trek'', but it can happen with other projects. --] (]) 18:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hello old boy, I've started a discussion at ] - would appreciate your input. ] (]) 23:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

== New Year's Eve ==

I thought I'd come here about my reversion of one of your edits. I tried to make my edit summary clear, but I didn't understand why you wanted to reorder the cast without listing the "starring" cast first. And I didn't understand what you meant by "remerge". I'll watch your Talk page so we can discuss it if you like.--] (]) 01:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:I'd hardly call it an edit war. In your first change, you never said you were reordering the cast alphabetically - you didn't clarify that until you reverted. At least now I understand what you were doing. I tried to see if there was any consensus for alphabetical ordering at the Film Project's Talk page, but, so far, no consensus at all. So, I'll leave it the way you have it.--] (]) 04:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

== ] ==

You ], but given new information that the film is now on hold, would suggest a redirect to ] is more appropriate as per ], and as per suggested by multiple editors at the deletion discussion. Would appreciate input at ]. --] (]) 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

== 3RR ==

A breach of ] requires more than three reversions in a 24-hour period, so is incorrect. According to the history at ], Bidgee has made only three reversions in 24 hours recently, so he hasn't breached 3RR. As of right now, he has made only two reversions in the past 24 hours, so right now he's not even close. However, ''you'' have made three, so you're close to breaching 3RR right now. For the record, Bidgee is correct, including a film that is in pre-production ''is'' ]. The film itself fails ], so there shouldn't even be an article on it.--] (]) 16:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I've now opened a report at ] as you made 4 reverts in 24 hours and 2 minutes. --] (]) 04:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

== Breaking Bad GAC ==

I guess I meant the back-to-back nominations for Outstanding Drama series.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 17:04, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
:I'll get to it before you have to open your presents.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 05:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
::Did you see my latest comments.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 01:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
:::I am a little confused as to whether you are still concerned about the GAC nomination or if you just want me to close it as a fail. You don't seem to be responding to my concerns any more.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
::::I got your reply. There are about a half dozen outstanding issues. You should either address or reply to each concern.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 16:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

== Edit-warring ==

You shouldn't need to be told this since ] but, don't try to bulldoze your edits into articles. As the editor trying to add to the article, the ] is on ''you'' to gain ] for your additions. is inappropriate. Open the discussion first, gain consensus to add your content and then add it. Don't add it and then expect it to remain in the article while discussion is underway. The status-quo normally stands until there is consensus to change. You know that. --] (]) 09:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

== Re: C&A GA nom ==

You're clearly not reading the directions posted on the GA page. To make any fixes, it has to be to the template itself on the talk page. The bot fills the page using that. ] <sub>]</sub> 05:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

== Tower Heist GAN ==

I have reviewed '']'' and placed the article on hold. See ] or ] for comments for improvement. Thanks. -- ] ] 13:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

== Happy Holidays! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]

—<span style="solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print">''']&nbsp;]'''</span> is wishing you ]! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ], ], ], ], ], ], ] or even the ], this is a special time of year for almost everyone! <br />

<small>Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to your friends' talk pages</small>.
{{clear}}
</div>

== GAN ] ==

Hi,

I have reviewed your nomination and left comments at ]. The article looks quite good, with only a few problems noted. I may add a few as I continue to look through it. Meanwhile I have put the article on hold.

Best wishes, ] (]) 21:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

*Yes, congratulations to you also for a most fascinating article. Best wishes, ] (]) 19:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

== '']'' No Consensus! ==

'']'' No Consensus!
Hello there, the article ''Untitled Star Trek Sequel'' was undeniably unaccepted by other Wikipedians that read the article. However, the article was left without a consensus. Would you like to resume the ]?--] (]) 18:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks RAP, here is one yourself for your multiple contributions to raising article quality. I'd have given you a Good Article barnstar but I couldn't find the option, lol. ] (]) 16:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
|}

== Misplaced Pages:Good article nominations ==

You are not suppose to edit ] directly. I am not sure if you have confused the bots, but please reread the procedures on the page and follow them.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 19:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

== ] December 2011 Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 22:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0219 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:PMDA.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 03:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
:Got it - thanks! ] (]) 00:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
:Just FYI - its been orphaned once again... ] (]) 05:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

== GAN ==

So, just now I noticed you jumped the gun on me and nominated ]. Well, you'd better put refs in Home media and Sequels/spinoffs, replace (though one I just fixed to hide...), and fix the styling throughout the article (some are bare urls, other lack publisher, etc.), just for starters. I may even help you with that sometime. ] ] 01:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/The Muppets' Wizard of Oz/1|ts=04:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)}}
] (]) 04:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

==Non-free rationale for File:Tensessions.jpg==
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ].

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] ] 14:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

== A good guideline ==

Please go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Dorothy_L._Sayers#Written_like_an_essay to see how I handled the fact that I am about to do a major overhaul of an article, and note the specifics I gave, the reasons, the time-line, and the chance for others to comment. This is a good example of how to proceed when a big change has to be made by someone the page writers have never heard of before. If you follow such examples, you should avoid the sort of trouble stirred up before. Good luck in all your future endeavors.--] 20:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

== Welcome Back :D ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I heard you had some hard times and since you're better now how about you settle yourself down with a Beer. Hope you feel better soon. ] (]) 11:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
|}

== ] ==

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Can I ask you to clarify a couple of the problems you listed on the review page? Thanks —<font face="IrishJig">''']'''<sub>]''']'''</sub></font> 00:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

==Orphaned non-free image File:Breakingbadopening.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 12:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

== Common names ==

Hey there Rusted AutoParts - ] doesn't exist - but ] does - Leanne Barlow is not Leanne's common name.] <small>]</small> 20:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
:You have made a point. A point of not discussing something and moving regardless on anyone else who may have an opinion on the matter. Those who edit soap opera articles usually discuss most things that are not that straight forward.] <small>]</small> 21:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

== Queen ==

. <font color="DarkGray">...</font> ] <sub>]</sub> 01:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Castle - Kate Beckett.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Castle - Kate Beckett.jpg==

<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

'''PLEASE NOTE:'''

* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{tlp|helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 06:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hey,

Note sure if you're aware or not, but to be included on the specific season page a player has to meet very stringent criteria (see here: ]), which is meant to keep those who play just a few games or have minor journeyman careers (which I would argue Comrie fall under), as the list would simply just become too long. Note that this is a much more stringent criteria than ] or ] for having their own page. I looked closely, but don't see any category which Comrie falls under. If i'm wrong, re-add with the source (retirement, that is); or if you want to contest it, do so at the talk page. ] 02:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

== Your edit on Act of Valor ==

Hello, I've reverted your edit on ]. It seems there was a missunderstanding. The parts I edited back in weren't the parts that were subject to a copyright violation. The "obvious copyright violation" that Parrot of Doom was talking about was not reverted back into the article. Also, with your edit, you reverted some vandalism back into the article and removed a valid category. This is also why I reverted your edit. ] (]) 15:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <font color="ORANGE">]</font><font color="NAVY"><sup>''']''' </sup></font> 17:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

== AfD and PROD notifications ==

Hey Rusted AutoParts. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the ] project's experiments. If you could go ] and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links on the page), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swalling{{@}}wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! <font style="font-family:Palatino, Georgia, serif;">]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]</font> 22:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

== Breaking Bad GA ==

I just finished reviewing your Breaking Bad GA. Only two small issues to sort out! Cheers--] (]) 02:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

== WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter ==

The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the ]. ] ] 00:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0243 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for March 8==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

== March 2012 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 01:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <font color="ORANGE">]</font><font color="NAVY"><sup>''']''' </sup></font> 03:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for March 16==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 18:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

== TS-19 ==

Sounds like a plan. I'll try and get started don Friday. :) —] (]) 01:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
:Hey! Sorry I took longer than expected. I was just being lazy as hell, being spring break and all. :P
:I found some reviews that you can add to the reception section.
::http://splashpage.mtv.com/2010/12/05/the-walking-dead-season-finale-review-episode-6-ts-19/
::http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-12-06/entertainment/27083377_1_doctor-plans-shane-zombie-virus
::http://voices.washingtonpost.com/celebritology/2010/12/walking_dead_season_2_finale_t.html
::http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2010/12/the-walking-dead-review-episode-16-ts-19.html
:—] (]) 21:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

== Re: ] ==

Discussion ]. ] (]) 05:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

== April 2012 ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware, ] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) &#124; ] 00:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

:I have asked the sysop who blocked both of you last time to consider reblocking you. The request is ] if you wish to comment upon it. — ] (]) &#124; ] 03:54, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

== WQA Notice ==

==Notice of Wikiquette Assistance discussion==
Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic ].}}<!--Template:WQA-notice--> Thank you.

==Orphaned non-free image File:Breakingbadopening.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 11:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

== Walking Dead GA ==

I finished a Walking Dead GA review. Only a few issues to fix. Cheers.--] (]) 21:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 20==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

==GA review of '']''==

Hello. I have listed out a few concerns for the article at the review page. I suggest you go through them and rectify them at the earliest; one week's time has been provided for this. Currently, the article is ({{GAReview|status=on hold}}). Cheers, ~*~''']]'''~*~ 05:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

You added an award nomination but did not supply a citation; I have undone this addition. You're welcome to re-add it with an appropriate cite. ] (]) 15:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ] ==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. ] (]) 05:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ] (]) 06:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
:See also: ]. ] (]) 06:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

== Bond 24 ==

See ]: "] is not policy". In other words, it's only advice and it doesn't have to be stuck to rigidly, '''IF''' the subject is worthy of note. - ] (] • ]) 15:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
:It would have been better if you had discussed it before the revert. There is one source cited, but a Google search shows a number of other references: To have put them all in would be overkill as only one is needed. - ] (] • ]) 16:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 27==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ] (]) 01:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

==Frid==
Hi, Rusted. Well, I won't revert at this point, but now the article contradicts itself: The lead and the infobox say April 14, but the main article body, in the death section, gives both the 13th and the 14th. We can't have the article contradict itself. What would be the best solution? --] (]) 02:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

:Well, it's more than speculation &mdash; it was reported the 13th by the LA Times, the Washington Post and USA Today, to name three major papers. And both they and the ones saying the 14th have cited family sources since the family made a premature statement and then told a few papers something different. So that's not a practical phrase. And having someone shoot the tombstone is ].

:With all due respect, when major ] papers contradict themselves, we can only report what they all say. Picking one over the other is POV. It also goes against the consensus on the article talk page.--] (]) 03:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ] (]) 14:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Are you planning to conclude this review any time soon? It has been over two weeks since your short comments. ] (]) 03:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

==''Tron: Legacy''==

Hello. I am sorry to say but the article '']'' has '''failed''' its ]. You are encouraged to work on the article and take up a ] of the article before submitting it for another review. Regards, ~*~''']]'''~*~ 11:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. ] (]) 11:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:Pulp Fiction/GA3|ts=18:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)}}
] (]) 18:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

== Pulp Fiction ==

Is there a list of things that the article needs to be done to the ] article for it to pass. I'd like to work on the article and your input would be appreciated. ] (]) 19:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ] (]) 11:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Phenomenal work on expanding the '']'' article so it can qualify to be a ]. ] (]) 03:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
|}

== Thx ==

Thanks for the cookie. I'm not done with the article yet, though. Graduating high school was my first priority, so I didn't get nearly as much done as I wanted. I graduated yesterday, so I'll try and finish out real soon. :) —] (]) 17:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

== ] on ] ==

Hi Rusted AutoParts,

I've noticed that you have been removing ] from the list of highest grossing films on ]. Currently, the majority of people participating in a discussion on ] think that The Intouchables should be included on the top 10 list. As I explained there, if we want to list films by the how much money they made in a given calander year, that would require significant changes to the film years lists. For instance, films like Avatar and Titanic, that made lots of money in the following year after their release, would need to be moved to another year or appear on two lists. Many other films might change places on the lists, as many films that were released near the end of the year probably made a lot of their money in the next year. I think the easiest way to handle the lists (and the way I think they have been handled until now) is to list films' grosses all for one year, and to use Box Office Mojo as the source for what year a film is counted in. I don't see a compelling reason to change from doing that. If you disagree, please discuss the reasons why you think we should do something different at ], rather than just removing ] from the list without explanation. ] (]) 13:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

== Edit-warring on BLPs ==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

Your edit summary ''(he is very against religion. He is atheist)'' indicates a misunderstanding of what an ] is; it has nothing to do with religion, and refers to deities. Your edit summary ''(give me a source saying he's agnostic, whereas his actions on his show clearly show otherwise)'' indicates a misunderstanding of Misplaced Pages editing policy; we do not edit BLPs based on our own perceptions of a person's actions. We must rely instead on ]. Maher has self-identified many times as an ]. He has been referred to as an Agnostic in a multitude of reliable sources, such as one, so he would fit that category. He has at times even that he is an Atheist. ] (]) 03:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

== Comic book movie ==

Hey i didn't want to revert you...but comic book movie seems to count as unreliable source. Tenebrae probably started with the realization of that. But overall if you notice it even says "fansite" on the url and that is close enough to prove that it's not really on Misplaced Pages's standards. Even still go on with your good work on Misplaced Pages ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 19:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

== Tom Maynard 18 June 2012 ==

In ] you and another editor appear to disagree whether cause of death for Tom Maynard should be "train strike" or "hit by train," but I can't tell who prefers which. The current version is "train strike." Just inviting you to discuss this on ] if you want. ] (]) 18:05, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

== Comment on Nora Ephron's page ==

She literally just died. WA Post just confirmed it in a tweet.

--] (]) 00:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for June 29==

Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 16:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Taken2TheatricalPoster.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 23:36, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

== Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)/GA2 ==

You have not responded to ]. Please do so soon.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 13:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
== Orphaned non-free media (File:Taken2TheatricalPoster.jpg) ==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 04:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

{{Talkback|InfamousPrince}}

== Catherine ==

Once you stop being rude.<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 14:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

:What ''on earth'' are ? I am completely perplexed. You think it's rude to mention her scar? I think there are probably hundreds of people who heard something from a source of questionable reliablilty (say, ]), and would come to us for the accurate story, which--with a source like the ]--we could provide for them. You are entitled to disagree about whether or not this merits inclusion, but to suggest I'm being rude is preposterous.

:Understand this: We do not all think identically here, and we need to recognize that when dealing with others. If you think I'm being rude, explain why, because it's sure as hell not clear to me why you think this. (Note: I '''''do''''' accept that you are being sincere in this accusation; if I was presuming to know everything, I might just conclude that you were being a troll, but I'm choosing to regard this as incomplete communication.) But when you ''do'' communicate, please be careful in how you do it. I ''still'' have absolutely no idea what word you were intending when you wrote "intricle". I looked it up, it doesn't exist, so I tried to guess what word you may have misspelled, and I just can't figure it out. So the point is, '''''I'm''''' trying to understand you. Now do ''your'' part, and please make yourself more clear.

:And of course, it follows from this, that perhaps I'm failing to make ''my''self clear. If this is the case, please say so.

:Cheers, ] (]) 13:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
::Firstly, i was referring to previous edit summaries, where you have a rude demeanor. And your reply here is quite rude with sentences like "understand this" or doing ''this'' to certain words. And intrical (i spelt it wrong) is another word for integral, meaning it isn't a necessary part of the article. <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 14:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Thank you, RAP, for your civil and cogent response. I'd like to reply now:
:::*First of all, on the article in question, I have made four edits, and left three edit summaries. To wit:
:::# '''Edit summary:''' No edit summary was left; I suppose that could be regarded as uncivil.
:::# '''Edit summary:''' ''Kiss off''. Was that uncivil? Clearly, yes. Yet I hasten to point out that a) this was several days ago, b) it did not involve you, and c) the involved editor and I have worked things out rather well.
:::# '''Edit summary:''' ''Respectfully disagree with reverting editor. Consider A) it got a lot of coverage in the meda, and B) wikipedia is increasingly THE source for accurate information, and someone could well come here looking to verify this.'' Was this uncivil? Not in any universe I've visited. Indeed, if there were an award for the <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red">Epitome in Edit Summary Excellence</font>, I think I'd put my own name in nomination for that one. And I hasten to point out that the editor I reverted there, ], expressed no misgivings about my demeanor.
:::# '''Edit summary:''' ''Well, I think we can agree that the addition was not "intricle" to the article, or anything else. I'll hold off on reverting your removal of material that I believe I justified, and ask that you tell us what word you were trying to use.'' Was this uncivil? I'm presuming you think it was, since this is the only one of my edit summaries that pertains directly to you. Here's my take: Actions speak louder than words. Now look at my actions: I did '''''NOT''''' revert you, even though I disagreed with you, because I wanted to give you another chance to explain yourself. If that's not civil, I don't know what is.
::::My conclusion is that my edit summaries, while imperfect, do not distract so greatly that we could not have been discussing the content of the article, which is what I was clearly trying to do.
:::*When you say I am being rude by using phrases like "Understand this", I am not totally certain I understand, but I'm guessing that you feel it sounds dogmatic or overbearing. I choose, when I read someone else's words (and knowing that I cannot see them) to interpret their words as charitably as possible, so I would never have come to that conclusion. But, keeping in mind ], I have to acknowledge that I cannot expect other editors to read the way I do. So I apologize for giving offense, and will try to avoid this in the future (though I'm sure the habit will take a long time to break).
:::*Now when you say I do ''this'' to certain words, are you speaking of the use of italics to indicate emphasis? If this is a complaint, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. RAP, if we were sitting down in the same room, both you and I (unless you are a Rusty '''''Bot''''') would be italicizing words all the time. Written English provides very few ways to add natural emphasis to our words. Of the four that come to mind (<u>underlining</u>, '''boldfacing''', ''italicizing'', and ALL CAPS), I tend to think that italicizing is the mildest and yet most effective way to imitate the natural "feel" of speech. And I don't understand why it would offend you. I've been editing Misplaced Pages since 2006, and this is the first time I've ever seen that complaint.
:::Good talking to you. ] (]) 16:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
::::I don't know, maybe it's the way you come off. I read this and all i can think of is "this guy is rude." Especially when you go into great detail to defend yourself, and even in the above comment, it seems very rude and condescending.<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 04:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
:::::Well, I don't really know what to say. When I speak briefly, via edit summaries, I come across rude. When I "go into great detail", I come across rude. It's not helpful that you're not nailing down details, but that's not necessarily your fault, since sometimes (just as you say) someone can just "come off" in a certain way.

:::::I think it's best in a situation like this to simply ] (which shouldn't be too hard to do, since I'm taking an awful lot of time trying to work things out with you) and instead of inferring my attitude, just look at my work and my ideas for the articles. After all, even if I am a bastard, that doesn't mean I can't be a valuable contributor to the encyclopedia, right? What do you say? ] (]) 12:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

== 2012 in film ==

I checked a few of the names you removed , and the ones I looked at appear to be legitimate 2012 film industry deaths? Is there a reason you removed them? ] (]) 21:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
:Every actor is considered notable if he/she has a Misplaced Pages article. I will be restoring them. In the future, please get a consensus on the talk page for such a major deletion instead of making a unilateral decision. If you feel that some of the actors are not notable enough for Misplaced Pages, you can go through the normal deletion process. Thanks. ] (]) 21:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
::Since you're a regular I won't template you. But I suggest that you review ] and ask you to discuss on the talk page instead of edit warring and making unilateral decisions. That's the way it's done on Misplaced Pages. You've been around long enough to know that. ] (]) 19:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
:::Edit warring includes more than 3RR. Again, review ]. You are edit warring if you continue to revert after being asked to discuss on the talk page. Your opinion about what is "bloated" carries no more weight than my opinion or any other editor's opinion. All of the names are linked to Misplaced Pages articles. You alone don't decide what is notable. Please stop continuing to remove the information without getting ] on the talk page. As I said, you've been around long enough to know this. ] (]) 19:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi Rusted AutoParts. I've just come across the "Notable deaths" section in this article, where you've to include many people who died in 2010. It appears it has stayed that way for months now. I'm confused as to what's going on there. In your edit summary you refer to "an expansion process"...? Thanks, <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 07:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under Misplaced Pages policy, all newly created ''']''' must have at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Madison Lintz|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] (]) 16:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Interesting article. FYI, I've reviewed it for GAC. Good luck, and let me know how I can help. After it passes (which it will, after you've made the changes I've requested), I'd be willing to copyedit it further if you like. ] (]) 17:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

== Smallville ==

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> This includes being petty and just removing all images entirely because you don't like people disagreeing with you. ] ] 00:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
*Just a heads up, you're past 3RR with . It's likely someone will report you at ], if you don't mind me suggesting, perhaps the best thing to do would be to self-revert until some consensus is reached on the talk page, in order to avoid being blocked? - ]] 00:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for September 3==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 14:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

== Apology ==

Apology accepted. Please try to discuss on talk pages when you disagree with someone. ] (]) 21:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

== Kylie Platt ==

Hi, I've just noticed that you moved ] to ], without discussing the move on the talk page. What bothers me a little bit more is that the correct article name is actually ], so I've had to contact an admin to help sort out the situation. - ] ] 14:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

== A cup of coffee for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | showed up as potential vandalism on STiKi, but instead of reverting the edit and warning you, I'll give you a cup of coffee instead. Drink up, and get more energy for further anti-vandalism efforts! :) ] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{]}} message on ].</small></span> @ 20:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
|}

== Userpage reply ==

I'm not an admin at this point in time, you'll have to ask an active admin or post a query to ] or something like that. Good luck! &mdash; ''']''' (]) 15:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Take a look at this article news report which dates from November 2010 and this article which dates to January 2011. Now, it is possible that a politican with the name of Minoru Mizuta did also die in August 2012 but I was unable to find any independent corroboration of this asserted fact, all I could find in my research were mirror-sites to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

== September 2012 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ]&nbsp;without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> <span style="padding: 3px; background: #EEE; color: #007; border: #CCC 1px solid; text-transform: uppercase; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">] ● ] ● ]</span> 20:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
== Deletion discussion about Victor Brännström ==

Hello Rusted AutoParts,

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a deletion discussion about the redirect ]. If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please leave your comments ] Thanks, <span style="border-bottom: 2px solid #F40; font-family:Cambria, serif;">]&#8239;•&#8239;]</span> 15:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 8==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

== Knighthood ==

When a man receives a knighthood, 'Sir' becomes a title part of their style of address. What on earth can it have to do with 'weight'? ] (]) 16:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

:I'm disappointed that you have not replied. You are quite wrong; ] states that biography articles on Knights do not normally include 'Sir' in the article title, save where it is useful for disambiguation, but it is still a title that is invariably quoted on the entries in the Deaths in ... series. Have a look back at some old entries if you want confirmation. I have raised this issue on ]. ] (]) 19:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 15==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

== Sandler ==

Thanks for finally giving a better explanation (I wish you'd done that 2 days ago). Please keep in mind that we editors are here to work together, not against each other, and to use talk pages -- instead of edit warring. --] (]) 23:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.

I reverted the redirect and PRODded the article as I don't think it's correct to redirect a person's bio to a TV show she appeared in. She has appeared in several other roles. It should either be made a real sourced article or deleted.

See ]: "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. In such a case, it is better that the target article contain a redlink than a redirect back to itself." ] (]) 05:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

: Don't just put the redirect back. See ]. And ''The Walking Dead'' is not her only credit. She's also in ], ] at least. That's why it's wrong to redirect to ''The Walking Dead''. ] (]) 14:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 15:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Madison Lintz|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] (]) 16:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

== Citations ==

Hello, it seems that you're an experienced editor. I just wanted to ask that you fill in your references when adding material to articles instead of adding bare URLs. You can use the citation templates with little work, as you may know. Thanks. ]&nbsp;{{su|p= ] |b= ]|fontsize=1.5ex}} 02:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

* Hey sorry, I know it's not right. I was in the process of fixing it. ]&nbsp;{{su|p= ] |b= ]|fontsize=1.5ex}} 15:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

== Notification ==

Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

== November 2012 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for personal attacks.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 20:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
{{unblock reviewed|Well, considering the debate is still open and i've been blocked before i had the chance to explain myself, perhaps we should look at this as trigger happy and too soon? Plujs, allow me to point out the editor whose feelings i've "hurt" continued to revert? A little biased in his favor too.|decline=No grounds for unblock provided. was quite sufficient. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 22:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)}}
:Your defence to "personal attacks" is "BUT WAIT, PEOPLE ARE STILL TALKING"? And you have a chance to explain yourself ''here''. I'd suggest you take advantage of it. ] (]) 22:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
:'''Note'''. I notice this User Account has been blocked 3 times. I do not understand how can lead to a Block, unlike the other Blocks that I seen on this User Account before. This is not too extreme to lead to a Block again. I suggest giving him a Warning instead, with a strong reminder that the next time will be an .--] (]) 09:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::My problem is that there is an ANI discussion about the conduct i used on the BB talk page and i can't discuss it as i was blocked way before i had the chance to explain plus the block wasn't even suggested at all, one editor just did it. I'm wondering why this occured when a block for the personal attacks wasn't even suggested. ] (]) 14:10 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::Alright, i'll move the ANI discussion here.
{{User|Rusted AutoParts}} began reverting me on ] without discussion. When I initiated one on the talk page (]), he instantly became aggravated and starting pouring a bucket of ad hominems at me, while skewing other editors' opinions to conveniently suit his editing choice, which is discriminatory and offensive in nature. This is how his replies build up:<br />
*
* (Pot calling the kettle... what?)
*"Corrected" the previous attack to an even more obviously personal one: (referring to my reply , where I merely pointed out that it only makes sense that a US production, which airs on a US channel, will be primarily in English.)
*The big finish:
I know I should have known better and stopped reverting too, but RAP's outrageous barrage of attacks got the best of me. ] (]) 18:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
:Where do I begin? This wasn't even directed at you personally, i was stating that your theory German was a main language was. German was used twice in two episodes of one season, and Spanish, as Drivethroughosts pointed out, has been used in 4 seasons in a highly used manner. (Pot calling the kettle... what?)
"Corrected" the previous attack to an even more obviously personal one: (referring to my reply , where I merely pointed out that it only makes sense that a US production, which airs on a US channel, will be primarily in English.) Now, i was going to remove this completely, but I know that is frowned upon. I thought it was the case as it was odd your focus shifted to just English being used, but I soon realized that you were just being petty because German was removed. Speaking of which, how did you get off scot clean when you continuously edit warred, even when i asked you stop until someone had the same exact view as you (Spanish and German, or none), as the comments clearly stated they were fine with Spanish staying in? And lastly is where the only place I'll apologize for (My car was damaged purposely around this time, so i was pretty pissed off). Asking anyone to perform ] is just grotesque, so i do apologize. None of these responses were aimed to be personal, but seeing as it hurt your feelings, i sit confused. I could just as easily cry at the sheer stupidity that was displayed. But i won't as i rarely cry and you aren't stupid, but the whole situation was stupid and unnecessarily escalated. Now, with that said, Hearfourmewesique, if it's an apology you seek, you'll not receive one (except the ]), but i do hope you acknowledge this wasn't a personal attack, just poorly expressed frustration. ] (]) 15:11 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::"suck my dick" is merely poorly expressed frustration? Get better at expressing frustration. Find a way of doing it that isn't so gratuitously and unnecessarily offensive. People who don't tend not to (or, rather shouldn't) last. ] (]) 15:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
:::I already explained what spawned that crude and awful response. Some kids keyed my car and smashed a window. I wasn't exactly pleased in real life and on here. I regret the statement and can only hope that you can see that. ] (]) 15:33 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::::I hope it passes in court for you someday: "Sorry your honor, some kids smashed my car window so I stabbed my neighbor." If you truly believe is not a personal attack, you might be unsuitable for Misplaced Pages altogether. ] (]) 20:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
::::*A couple more points:
::::#Even if "bullshit" wasn't directed at me, this is not an appropriate tone to begin your part of a discussion. Especially when you refused to initiate it to begin with, forcing me to do so myself.
::::#Someone DID have the exact same view as I, it was TheOldJacobite, the second comment in the thread. Another editor expressed that his ideal position is just English, but he didn't care for it enough to vote either way. It doesn't mean, by ANY applicable logic, that he supports you, mainly because '''his ideal position is the same as mine'''. You are still misrepresenting those editors, and if that's not bad enough &ndash; you point at me in the most infantile of manners (hey look, the kid I just threw a rock at spilled ice cream over your lawn!) to try and soften your own fall. This, too, is extremely unsuitable for Misplaced Pages.
::::#Another piece of advice (still unsure why I even bother to begin with) &ndash; remaining unapologetic and refusing to acknowledge that you actually '''did''' hurt someone's feelings by putting quotation marks and using excessive sarcasm whenever the subject comes up is, again, the last thing you want to do. That is, if you want to redeem yourself. ] (]) 21:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
:::::Some tips for you as well:
*When someone asks for you to wait until a more ironed out consensus (IE, if that one editor is divided, you and Jacobite say no and me and another editor say it's fine) DON'T continue to revert, even if "my outrageous barrage of attacks" (i'm not putting quotes around this as a sarcastic theme, rather quoting what you said) gets "the best of you" (again, not meant to be sarcastic). I've been in that boat before, it don't hold water.
**When someone says "They misread your intentions" (meaning when you claimed I discriminated against you, how?) for one thing and then realizing it was you saying "my way or the highway", don't continue claiming discrimination, as it's slanderous to me.
***No one is a saint or a sinner in this case. My hopes is for both of us to push this behind us and be able to work together rather than biting one another's head off. And yes, my anger towards the vandals to my car should not have been radiated onto you. I am much calmer and reading back on half the things i've said, i must have come off as a giant asshole. I do apologize in all scenarios and perhaps this month block would give me time to really work on becoming a better editor. ] (]) 21:55 4 November 2012 (UTC)

== Apollo 13 ==

Hi, Could you edit the Apollo 13 film article, cropping the cast photos and adding a photo of the blu-ray cover. Thanx. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Possibly unfree File:BreakingBadcastphoto.jpg ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 04:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

== Heya ==

In an attempt to get past the impasse that has been reached re the capitalisation of I in intro on the ] article, I have created two additional sub-sections where users can put their for/against argument comments in without getting caught up in ]. These sections are purely for providing reasons and not for arguing back and forth, although discussions are welcome to continue in the above section. If you could come and give your view that would be great. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 21:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

== Holiday cheer ==

{| style="border: 3px solid red; background-color: #FFFAF0;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" | |rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"|'''Holiday Cheer''' |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This is for your tireless contributions to ]. ] (]) 15:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid blue;"|''']''' '']'' is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes ], and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.
|} |}


== i need you help == == Fairy Tale ==


Thanks for getting in touch. Sure, yes makes sense. Best, G ] (]) 18:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
hello how are you, I want to report a person who insult me and he dont need do it ​​by rank in wikipedia, is doing and of course I'll saying nothing, he rudely replied ,
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Darkwarriorblake # VANDALISM.3F.3F
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Grapple_X # nobody_answer_me_in_the_consensus


==Concern regarding ]==
I hope your help, thanks.
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== insults are the problem: s ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
don't is the idea insult me. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Concern regarding ]==
== Hey, ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
I just uploaded my first image! (yay). Have added it to the ]. Can you just give the fair use a once over and check that it's ok please? It can be found Thank you. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 11:00, 9 January 2013 (UTC)


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== A barnstar for you! ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 00:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Teamwork Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In particular for the ongoing discussion on ] regarding a pesky little I. At the end of the day, it may not have been resolved but we all did work together to try and get it sorted, even if we did feel at times we were banging our heads on our desks and calling our computer screens idiots. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 14:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
|}


== ] == == Denys Graham ==


Hi {{ping|Rusted AutoParts}}, I've restored ] to the ] page. Firstly, your assessment of the source "feeling a bit bloggy"... If you take a look at , it's abundantly clear that it's an organisation for professional actors: "Actors & Writers London (AWL) is London’s longest-running professional play-reading forum for actors and writers. It was established in 1973 at Hammersmith’s Riverside Studios and was known as Hammersmith Actors and Writers Group until July 2004." I can't see any evidence of it being a personal blog of any kind. Secondly, if you're unsure of a source and want to discuss it – and it's not one that has been previously ruled out – we have the talk section of Deaths in 2024 for that. Thanks ] (]) 20:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
] / ]: "Categories regarding sexual orientation of a living person should not be used unless the subject has publicly '''self-identified''' with the belief or orientation in question".<br/>
Also, ] says "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing". ] • ] 19:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


==Concern regarding ]==
{{Tb|Edenc1|Reply}}
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
==Personal attacks==
Regardless of the merit of your arguments, you are again resorting to edit-warring and personal attacks in edit summaries (such as ) as opposed to pursuing ]. Note if it continues you will very likely be blocked again. As your last block was for a month I'm sure you can find it within yourself to discuss the ] article on the talk page or via ] as opposed to arguing and calling others who disagree with you "stupid" via edit summaries? --]<sup>]</sup> 20:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 03:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
== M Dallas ==
==Your draft article, ]==
]


Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
hi - As per ] - please do not replace again w/o discussion and ] support, discussion is at ] - thanks - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 21:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
== Broken City ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 22:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
{{talkback|Talk:Broken City (film)|Cast}}


==Concern regarding ]==
==Disambiguation link notification for January 26==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 04:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)


== Jodie Foster == == Legacy.com ==


Hi there. I saw your update to the death date at ]. I started a related discussion at {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Conflicting_death_dates_on_Legacy.com}} that you're invited to join. Thanks.—] (]) 18:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
You cannot add the LGBT cat to this BLP per consensus at the BLP notice board. ] (]) 19:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
:Please do not restore the LGBT to the Foster article, per the consensus ] (]) 15:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
== ] ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
I think the ] page is wrong. The BBC source cited there doesn't actually give a date whereas the Guardian obit (which actually is cited in the Sophia Haque article) does. I will take this to ].--] (]) 17:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Scjessy ==


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
Hi, sorry, but isn't acceptable. ]&nbsp;<sup>]] ]]</sup> 17:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
:That is an personalized and borderline personal attack not suitable for the article talk namespace. You put it on his user talk page, he read it, then removed it. Drop the stick; this is a last warning. Regards, ]&nbsp;<sup>]] ]]</sup> 17:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
==] of ]==
]


</div>
The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:10&#39;s regeneration.jpg==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Rowan Blanchard|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> -- ] ] 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
==Your draft article, ]==
]


Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
==Disambiguation link notification for February 2==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

== Thanks for the larf! ==

.

== Please don't remove plot flaws ==

There are people out there who care about the mistakes Doug made on ] and ]. People who haven't seen the movie wouldn't want to be misinformed now would they? ] (]) 19:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

==Your abuse of Twinkle==
If I see you inappropriately using Twinkle (or any other tool) again, , it will be reported. Your edit history shows that this is not the first time you've done it. Falsely identifying a user's edits as vandalism is highly inappropriate. --] (]) 01:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
:Rusted is allowed to revert changes in his own user space without reason. If he removes something on his talk page, then it is assumed that he has read it.] (]) 01:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

May I ask why you re added the interlanguage links to ]? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Disambiguation link notification for February 19==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

== GA Review ==

Hello there. I was wondering if you'd be interested in a reviewing an article for GA; ]. It is a soap opera article, and I thought I would ask you to see if you'd have any interest because I see you reviewed another soap article, ], awhile back. If you could let me know at your earliest convenience, it would be gladly appreciated. Thank you! Regards, ]] 23:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:Star Trek Into Darkness|References|ts=06:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)}}
] (]) 06:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for February 26==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added links pointing to ] and ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

== Soap review ==

Hello again. I wasn't sure if you saw my first message above, but I just wanted to see if you had any interest in reviewing ] for GA. Don't mean to be a bother or anything but I was just curious. Thanks! Regards, ]] 05:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

== response requested ==
{{Tb|MichaelQSchmidt#Request}}

:A redirect to a redirect. Haarumph. ] deleted as requested. Per it being an unneccesary diambig, go ahead and now ] the ] one to overwrite ] <u>without</U> leaving another redirect behind. ''']''' '']'' 05:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
::The ] had now been G4 deleted as an unnecessary redirect of a title that does not require disambiguation. ''']''' '']'' 18:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

== March 2013 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 03:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

] Please do not add or change content, as you did to ], without ] it by citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 02:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ''']''' (]) 09:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 00:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

== RD ==

Come on, I don't want to partake in a ] edit war. Fleming was a journeyman NHL assistant coach. Just having one example implies that he was most notable/known for his service to one team, which he was clearly not (the article does not even mention his time in Phoenix, news articles don't refer main mainly to his coaching in Phoenix, rather, like I'm saying, to his "longtime" service as a assistant). I'm not being selfish at all by removing the one example - like I said, if all the teams he coached with were listed then I'd be fine. But just listing one team of a journeyman coach gives off the wrong message and I don't understand your adamancy in having the one Phoenix example. – ] (]) 03:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
:Can you stop with the reverting and maybe have a discussion? Listing one team for a journeyman like Fleming was does not give off good impressions. His name is not automatically associated with Philadelphia or Phoenix, rather, as I stated before, as a "longtime NHL assistant coach". – ] (]) 04:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
::Could you point me to the guideline that states that we need to have examples for all sports coaches? – ] (]) 04:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
:::That doesn't answer my question. I've already stated why I think there shouldn't be an example (or why all teams should be listed), I'm really wanting to know why you are so adamant that one example should be listed... – ] (]) 04:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
::::You don't need to get snappy. Come on, I don't feel like partaking in a pissing match with you. Did you even read my reasoning however? I think I've made it clear that he had coached many teams and isn't known for particularly one or two, as is with most sports-related people. Just because other sports-related deaths list examples, we can always disregard precedent for cases like this where I think the reasoning is acceptable. – ] (]) 04:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
:::::I do not have any favouritism at all towards the subject, no need to get accusatory - another editor is responsible for the bulk of the content but that should not matter either. I am just trying to provide a neutral and accurate depiction of his career. "It's the way it goes" is not a strong rebuttal to my arguments on your part. – ] (]) 05:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
::::::I've requested outside input at the RD talk page. And my argument certainly was not that he had a longtime career - it is that he had worked for many teams during his coaching career and that listing one implies that he is more notable for one rather than any other. If, say he spent 10+ years with one team and was a prominent fixture, I'd have no problem. But that doesn't seem to be the case here. Most news stories mention the teams he was with in passing. – ] (]) 05:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
== Maximiliano Hernández listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Maximiliano Hernández'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for March 31==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 20:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
==Recent deaths==
Kindly explain the purpose of
. Why are you not using an edit summary? ] (]) 21:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
:RAP is one of the 3 or 4 historical editors for the Death page. He will take off the "red links" 30 days from the calendar when the entries expire. By policy of the Death page, all notable red links are left for 30 days to encourage editors to develop articles.] (]) 08:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

== Miles O'Shea ==

I noticed you took off '']'' off the credit line. Please dont do that. Following the policy of Awards (Oscar, Emmy, Tony, etc) it should be listed first as the only major acting award he won. Thanks. ] (]) 08:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

== Scarlett Johansson Infobox image. ==

Rusted AutoParts! The photo has been reverted back to the Kuwait pic!] (]) 12:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Nymf is back! He is putting back the Kuwait pic! ] (]) 10:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

RAP, not sure why you are going around that image, when all the drama around it has been caused been an indefinitely blocked sock, who is not supposed to be editing Misplaced Pages at all. Care to explain? ] <sub>]</sub> 21:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

This is the IP,speaking to both of you,

I dislike the Kuwait pic because the Kuwait base looks like a film ] (]) 03:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

:Although I seen RAP's many stories that ended with "blocketry", I have to agree with him on this one. The Kuwait pic isn't as good as the 2012 pic in terms of ] comparison. Furthermore, the 2012 pic fits her current age better than the Kuwait pic, so why bother reverting back rather than '']''? --] (]) 06:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
::The image that RAP proposes has high ISO, making it full of noise. It is not fully in focus, and the subject is not looking into the camera. ] <sub>]</sub> 09:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

RAP, the IPs you are referring to is all the same, and is a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. They are not meant to edit Misplaced Pages anymore, and the article has been semi-protected to prevent them from further discussing Scarlett Johansson at all. If you look at the history of these IPs, they are edit warring other articles in similar manners. Look at the edit history of ], for example. We ''cannot'' treat blocked sockpuppets like it is okay, or that their opinion matters; if we do, they will just keep doing it. ] <sub>]</sub> 09:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
:I meant in the context of any edit war that involves several IP's insisting something be changed. We need to find a non biased photo or the IP will keeping sock hopping and this will never end.<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 15:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
::Actually, both the article and talk page are now semi-protected and I block each sock as it reappears. All editors in good standing should choose what they believe to be the best image, but the concerns of a block-evading IP are irrelevant.&mdash;](]) 16:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
:::Actually, more than irrelevant: I just noticed that this discussion had been instigated by the blocked editor. Editing at the request of a blocked editor is forbidden. Any effort to change the image in order to satisfy the blocked user will result in you being blocked yourself.&mdash;](]) 17:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

== United States ==

So, you think it's not a pointless abbreviation then? It's just you appear to have reverted my edit with zero explanation like I'm some common vandal. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

== Your signature ==

Please see ]. Thanks, <span style="font-family:monospace;">]</span>|] 16:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 22==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:09, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

== April 2013 ==
] Please ] other editors. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> ] • ] 11:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''No apparent reason for redirect to the TV show. If anything, to the article on ], but hardly seems necessary either. Either the guy is sufficiently relevant to "deserve" his own article or he isn't, but redirecting in this case just ends up with everyone going round in circles.'''

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

== Transcendence ==

I think the films during filming status should be created...I've seen articles which are created under filming conditions and also during pre-production. --<span style="text-shadow:#666666 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><big>''' ] '''</font></font></big></span></span><sup><small> ( ] - ] - ] ) </sup></small> 02:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

== Strange stuff ==
{{Tb|MichaelQSchmidt|Transcendence}}
:Done and done... both of 'em. And due to recreation, gave justified reasoning for salting for six months. ''']''' '']'' 05:08, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

== 2nd notification about your signature ==

{{caution|Please edit your signature so that it includes a link to this page - see ]. You were notified about this three weeks ago and have apparently not taken action, if you continue to do so you may be sanctioned for disruptive editing. ] (]) 09:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
}}

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Captain Assassin!|ts=01:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)}}
<span style="text-shadow:#666666 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><big>''' ] '''</font></font></big></span></span><sup><small> ( ] - ] - ] ) </sup></small> 01:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

== Scarlett Johansson ==

Quit edit warring and go to the talk page. Standard procedure is to leave the image as-is until there is consensus to change it. ]&nbsp;<sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 20:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
:Indeed. Rusted AutoParts, keep in mind that you were by Kww about this. ] <sub>]</sub> 18:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Captain Assassin!|ts=16:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)}}
<span style="text-shadow:#666666 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><big>''' ] '''</font></font></big></span></span><sup><small> ( ] - ] - ] ) </sup></small> 16:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

== Filming has begun, your nom statement is now in error ==
{{Tb|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/A Million Ways to Die in the West}}
:With the strike-through, all that remains of your nomination statement is an ] argument. Ouch. With respects, and though you may not always agree with ] or his editing practices, a withdrawal might be best at this point and your taking the high road and bowing to the weight of consensus would show you as reasonable and would not be seen in a negative light. ''']''' '']'' 09:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
::Thank you for revisiting. ''']''' '']'' 13:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

== Did again ==

So you are up to redirects again, as you did to ''Popeye (2014 film)'', I told you I'll never make redirect or anything to your articles, so don't do to mine's. That was already a redirect, so you just moved it to the next year and created your own, wow. That's illegal, what I was doing wasn't illegal because I was creating and adding contents to empty redirects, but you are moving redirects to make that again a redirect. I'll report you next time and I'll do that thing to yours too.--<span style="text-shadow:#666666 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><big>''' ] '''</font></font></big></span></span><sup><small> ( ] - ] - ] ) </sup></small> 11:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for May 20==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 00:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|JDDJS|ts=17:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)}}
] (]) 17:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for May 28==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 15:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

==]==
I did not mean to "pull rank" and apologize for my intemperate edit summary. I ''apparently'' misunderstood your "Move back" comment in a derogatory manner, i.e. as a verb directed towards me (akin to "Get lost" or "Beat it" or whatever). As far as this Durbin conundrum goes, I also revert when someone is wrong. I suggest you either contact an admin to decide how to handle this case or you contact Durbin's son to ask him the exact date of his mother's death which he ridiculously refuses to disclose or you contact some French governmental office of vital statistics to find out the exact date if it is that important to you. Until then -- stalemate. ] 16:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

== Cap 2 cast list ==

As you can clearly , Samuel L. Jackson and Robert Redford are listed just after Scarlett Johansson. I'd recommend checking a source before making an edit regarding it, but at least now you know. Reverting it again qualifies as a violation of ].<br>] (]) 05:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for June 4==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

== Edit Warring ==

==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you.<br>] (]) 20:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
:The complaint is at ]. You may respond there if you wish. ] (]) 21:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

== June 2013 ==

] Please do not remove ] notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with ]. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: '''Click here to contest this speedy deletion''', which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case '''''on the article's ]'''''. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-speedy2 --> --] (]) 15:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC) VG

] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you remove a ] notice from a page you have created yourself, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-speedy4 --> -] (]) 20:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you.<br>] (]) 21:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
==CaptainAssassin/redirects==
I request ] to examine this. Like before, CA had been pushing redirects I made in order to institute his own versions, which was completely unnecessary. He is now doing it again, with the relocation of ''Annie (2014 film)'', ''Rodham (film)'', ''Z for Zachariah (film)'', ''Gods of Egypt (film)'' and ''Blade Runner 2''. I request the edit histories of these be merged as it is not necessary to make a new redirect only because you want credit/control of it.<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 02:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
:Please don't use your talk page to request other editors to make edits for you while you are blocked.&mdash;](]) 03:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
::I'm not asking him to do it on my behalf, he knows that this guy has done it before, and it seems that now I'm blocked, he returned to this unnecessary method, resulting in unnecessary redirects as well as false ones. They simply should be merged as one history. <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 04:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
:To ''']'''.... found this only by accident. I have not been following CA nor RAP around but in looking at the redirects set by RAP and the "tweaks" by CA, I have input:
# The redirect for ] should indeed go to ] as, even if not yet meriting a separate article, it makes sense that the 2014 remake be discussed there until it does so merit. And as we have other ], per ] it should be "Annie (2013 film)" and not simply "Annie (movie)"
# The redirect for the distant ] should not have been created (sorry RAP) unless the redirect was to send readers to someplace where, in its ] an article, the future film is being discussed. I looked, but could not find it in the quite lengthy article on Hillary Clinton, so the RAP redirect was premature. In the same vein however, CA should not have redirected it unless he was sending readers to someplace where it was being discussed... and it is NOT being discussed in his redirect choice. So in both cases, AS a redirect it does not (currently) serve to increase a readers's understanding of the topic.
#"Z for Zachariah (film)" is also too soon for its own article. In this instance, CA's redirect of RAP's "Z for Zachariah" redirect to ] does send readers to the one place wehre (for now) it is sensible for it to be discussed. As they are both reasonable search terms, "Z for Zachariah" should go to the novel and "Z for Zachariah (film)" should go to the section in the novel's article where the proposed film is discussed.
# "Gods of Egypt (film)" is a fine redirect all by itself, a proper disambig from "Gods of Egypt" (article on Egyptian dieties)... and asna film IS discussed at the director article target. Fine. However, per ] the diambig'd "Gods of Egypt (2014 film)" is unneccessary.
# With Ridely Scott confirming that there is to be a next (as yet untitled) Blade Runner film, it is sensible that readers be sent to ], or even a new section there dedicated to the confirmed as a planned-and-in-pre-production film. "Blade Runner 2" is a possible title, sure... but has no confirmation. As the term "Blade Runner" needs to be disambig'd, CA's sending readers to "Blade Runner (1982 film)" is a decent place for the next film to be discussed.
:Long and short here... I think both RAP and CA need to better plan the targets for redirects, pay a little more attention to ], discuss things, or seek neutral input from others. Nothing either has done is irreversible, but nothing either has done needs to have been done hurriedly. I think that by working together the two could accomplish a lot. By the by fellows, I hate drama. Gives me a headache. ''']''' '']'' 09:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
::So is there any way for the redirects histories to be merged? They are all essentially the same thing, only he renamed them, like before, to receive credit. <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 10:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:::Some of his renamings were sensible. Some not. But it is not about "getting credit". It's about what is '''per''' ] and what is best for the readers. RAP, we all accept that you are a phenomenal content creator. And even though at least one of those redirects should be deleted as useless, what is best for the project is to make certain that the targets include information to serve readers. ''']''' '']'' 18:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
::::I know, but it's mind boggling as to why he moved the whole redirect, when he could have replaced the content. Now there are redirects that don't need to exist, and should be merged back to ther original place. I'm certain we told him this before. <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 18:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:::As nothing done is writ in stone, "mind boggling" would call for patience... and going to ] could have brought neutral eyes to the situation and avoided your temp block for warring. I respect your content creations, but both CA and you would have been directed to study and pay close attention to ] as redirects should serve to enlighten or aid readers, and then to ] to determine best name for a speculated future articles. The lack of communication has resulted in a series of redirects and redirects of redirects that will require ] to dissect and determine if they are reasonable or valid. Keep in mind that a proper ] encourages new content creation far better than does a redirect of a potential article. Even if a stubby and sourced article on a topic, one not yet ready for its own article, ends up with the stub being brought to AFD (not always a bad thing), it brings eyes on the topic and it either gets improved or we determine the ]. When there are conflicts, always best to step back and seek input from others. ''']''' '']'' 19:55, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
::::Imunderstand the part about validity part of the problem, but my issue is he had no real reason to relocate a perfectly fine redirect, which redirect completely to the right area, to a new, unnecessary location. The edit histories prove this. This is the chain of redirects you're talking about. It wasn't an issue until he took it upon himself to move the content onto a new page than change it on the already existent one. That's why I'm erked. That and I warned before against doing it like that. He didn't listen. If you were to look at his edit history, you'd see he's suddenly interested in creating the placeholders for films (announced and unannounced), so I do not think this was made with a concern for the content. <font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font> 04:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
:::::I'll stroll over. And placeholders will be discussed over at project film. ''']''' '']'' 09:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

I noticed your comment regarding Visual Editor. Are you aware you can disable this function ? If you go to your own 'Preferences' section and then press the 'Gadgets' button, then under the 'Editing' sub heading you will find a line which states "Remove VisualEditor from the user interface". Click the box and save your edit, and it will disappear. Sorry if I have told grandma how to suck eggs. Best wishes,

] (]) 16:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for July 6==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, introducing inappropriate pages, such as ], is not in accordance with our ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ].

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="text-shadow:#666666 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><big>''' ] '''</font></font></big></span></span><sup><small> ( ] - ] - ] ) </sup></small> 22:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
:I have removed the speedy deletion tag on this article as the "blatant hoax" reason clearly does not apply. Please see the article's talk page for details. - ] (]) 23:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

== You and ] ==

I've see your names pop up a few time and, after a bad speedy deletion tag, I just ran across ], ] and ].
:
I don't care who is "right", who "started it" or who did what to whom. Your interactions have become disruptive, IMO. I'd like to suggest that the two of you disengage from one another: If you are about to edit a page that the other editor has recently edited (or a redirect to such a page), simply let it go.
:
Failing that, I'm fairly sure the two of you will find yourselves discussing this with a few admins, and that is never a pretty thing.
:
Thoughts? - ] (]) 00:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:What can I say? I don't want more discussions with any admins, I'm never gonna touch his article again. The last one was just a simple mistake. --<span style="text-shadow:#666666 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><big>''' ] '''</font></font></big></span></span><sup><small> ( ] - ] - ] ) </sup></small> 03:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

== Cobie Smulders ==

Take a moment and explain to me what all of your previous blocks have taught you about edit-warring, and how it applies to your latest round on ].&mdash;](]) 16:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
:Learn a new lesson then: when you see a series of reversions breaking out, take it to the talk page ''first'' and don't participate, especially when it considers something as absolutely meaningless and trivial as an infobox picture. Setting it to the way ''you'' want it before taking it to the talk page simply aggravates an already brewing edit-war.&mdash;](]) 16:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
::For whatever it is worth, the mass changes of infobox images to these (often inferior) Comic Con versions is currently being discussed at ]. I am of the opinion that it is common courtesy to discuss image changes first. ] <sub>]</sub> 17:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

== Vandalism at Recent Deaths ==

Please stop removing the Grammy certification of JJ Cale on the Deaths in 2013 page. You have not once defended your edit, but continue to remove the entry, even after a link was provided to his 2008 award for The Road to Escondido. If you wish to discuss it, please bring it up on the Deaths in 2013 Talk Page and the Community can talk about it. We notate a number of Awards on the page including Emmys, Oscars, Grammys and any other major artistic National Awards such as Junos for Canadians and Living Treasure designations in the Far East. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 01:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

== You signature ==

Please see ] and fix your signature accordingly. It would seem that you disabled it months ago. ] (]) 19:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

:Two other people telling you to do the same ] and ]. Why haven't you complied? ] (]) 19:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

I thought that you had fixed this. Fix your signature to comply with ], or you will find your editing privileges removed.&mdash;](]) 19:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

:I don't understand why you think autosigning has anything to do with it. Are you saying that you get different results between typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> and when you press the signature button? It should just be a matter of what you have customized your signature box to contain. As for why I threaten blocks, it's what happens when an editor states that he has no intention of complying with guidelines and policies. When Nymf points a guideline or policy out to you, that should have an equal force to an admin pointing it out to you.&mdash;](]) 20:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

Thank you for the recent comment you left on my talk page. I know we disagree some times, but I acknowledge the good work you do in maintaining the "Deaths in 20XX" pages, especially in cleaning-up the redlinks. Regards, ] (]) 04:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

I protected it for 2 hrs to slow things down. Who are they?

*]
*]

Cheers, ] (]) 02:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

==Courtesy note: You are mentioned in an ANI regarding Captain Assassin!==
]
Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. --] (]) 22:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

== What you might do.... ==

You could post the request over at the talk page of ]... '''OR''' and maybe better... taqke a look at and ask assistance from someone there who has edited that page and apparently has knowledge of how to do it. ''']''' '']'' 00:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

== Avengers 2 ==

What do you mean its not a good source? Its the official casting call for the Avengers 2 for the London film shooting and shows the current cast members. - ]

Please stop it everybody knows that Hemsworth, Johansson, Renner, Jackson and Taylor-Johnson will be in Avengers 2. Why are you threatening to block me? Theres really no point in this. - ]

==Disambiguation link notification for August 21==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added links pointing to ] and ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added links pointing to ] and ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

== Scarlett Johansson awards page ==

Please get consensus before reverting it back. This is an encyclopedia not an opinion page, so your opinion of her being a "stiff" doesn't matter when it comes to a separate awards page which I don't think was hurting anything and was an appropriate size to move it's own page. ] (]) 22:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
:Yea, I'll let you. It was my edit, and you continue to revert thus I would allow you to revert me if you got consensus but don't you worry, I'll get consensus. ] (]) 11:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for August 28==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

== nominating for GA ==

I notice you're trying to add a nomination directly to ]. This page is actually maintained by a bot, so all you need to do is nominate an article on its talk page, and it will automatically appear on the GAN list. Instructions for this are in the large warning that appears atop WP:GAN when you try to edit it directly, but you can find the long version at ]. Thanks, and good luck with the nomination! I thought the movie was so-so but I've no doubt your article is much better. {{=)}} -- ] (]) 00:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

== DrummerSP investigation ==

Just heard from ] theres an investigation thinking we are the same person with two different accounts?!? Really man I dont really even know this user. Just give me a good explanation why you think we are the same thanks. - ]

== New user questions ==
Hello ]
Im ], I just got a new wiki account and I was wondering so we dont start off on the wrong foot what are somethings that I could do with the wiki community that would be helpful and wont cause any problems. - ] 29 August 2013 (UTC)

== How about we make that ''Man of Steel'' war into water under the bridge? ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Antiflame Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I'll admit that we got off on the wrong foot with that whole '']'' incident. I just thought that what I was contributing to the article was necessary. And I meant it when I said that at that point, I legitimately didn't know what an edit war was. So, here's my peace offering so we can make amends. --] (]) 18:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
|}

== Moving your post ==

I'm going to move what I added on the Guardians talk page to a new section, so that I can direct link it in the hidden comments. I would like to move your text on the full press release as well. Are you opposed to me moving it? - ] (]) 03:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

== Your rising from the dead barnstar ==

{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;"
|-
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | {{#ifeq:{{{3}}}|alt|]|]}}

|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Working Man's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for your chronlogical work on ]. I sent the person, who moved the info to it, a note, with a bit of a finger wag, for not following protocol when transposing. I will hopefully catch September's move before someone else does it blindly again. —''']]''' 03:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
|}

==Disambiguation link notification for September 8==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

== Jurassic World ==

Can you please stop giving me a hard time? I get its not filming but a bunch of films for 2015 that havent started filming already have articles like ] and ] if we already had the article as Jurassic Park 4 ages ago until it was my idea to change the name to ]. ] (]) 03:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I started a page move feel free to join the discussion ;). ] (]) 03:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

== Emma Stone image ==

*]
*I beg your pardon. You are going off-topic on ] so I will bring this to your user talk page instead. This is the photo of Emma Stone which I supported being retained in the article in March 2012. I do not see how it is squinty and I completely fail to see any microphone at all in the shot. ] (]) 15:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

== ScarJo partner ==

Hey, so why delete the partner parameter in her infobox? The ONLY reason I added him in the first place is being they are engaged now and not just dating, otherwise I wouldn't have added him. Just wondering. ] (]) 16:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

:Gotta, fair enough! :) ] (]) 19:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

You did the move incorrectly. For lack of a better word, you did an "Assassin". You only moved the text, but not the article's history. There should be no reason to manually set the redirect. The redirect gets set when you move the article. Hmmm, I need to visit your talk page more often. Nice Emma Stone image and, droool, Scarlett Johansson. ] (]) 05:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=Jionpedia
|1=t
}} 12:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

== Edit warring on Elementary ==

Please refrain from edit warring on Elementary; there is an ongoing discussion of how to handle Moriarty and Mycroft, who has been announced as a real recurring character, and the article should remain at the stable version -- without either listed as recurring. You should discuss on the talk page, as the community expects, rather than repeatedly reverting to force an edit. --] (]) 18:47, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for September 21==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:38, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==

The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=Jionpedia
|1=t
}} 15:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

== Congratulations! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Superman barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For making '']'' a GA. I see the article also has great potential to become a ], so don't give up! ] (]) 15:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
|}

==Deaths in 2013==

Oh, you win! Life is too short to keep arguing over something so trivial. Besides which, you obviously put a lot of time and effort into helping with the deaths page and in all other respects your contribution is a positive one to be appreciated. I'd only add in a mixture of confusion and friendly remonstrance:

1. If you are in New Zealand's time zone, why does your page say you are from Las Vegas, Nevada and your list of countries visited not mention New Zealand, or for that matter even Australia?

2. Even if one takes New Zealand time - a sensible approach - your last 2 edits have been nearly a day early. Why the persistent desire to pre-empt, even when WWGB has explicitly asked you not to do so, viz. 26 August at 22.33 and 27 August at 04.07. It's hard to avoid the suspicion that that you see it as "your" job to delete the redlinks, and you want to make sure that no one takes it from you to it, even if it means repeatedly and persistently flouting agreed practice.

3. I don't take personally your description of the attempt to maintain the page according to long established and agreed guidelines as "vandalism", as a squint at your user page shows clearly that you have "form" in reacting to other people in this way. But I doubt it is in your interest to misrepresent any change to your work in this way. Your most recent effort, of using threats of a ban is an especially obtuse and intemperate.

] (]) 23:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)rcb1] (]) 23:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

==Deaths in 2013==

Thank you for your polite, prompt and thoughtful reply. I understand more where you are coming from now, and I won't revert your changes any longer. But I'm sure it's not just me that would appreciate it if you wouldn't delete any earlier than you have done in the last couple of days.

Beautiful, beautiful country New Zealand - with as high a quality a life as anywhere I've been to. ] (]) 00:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)rcb1] (]) 00:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
|}


In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
==Disambiguation link notification for September 28==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 19:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


==Concern regarding ]==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== Your ] nomination of ]==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=TonyTheTiger
|1=t
}} 01:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


==Concern regarding ]==
== Your ] nomination of ]==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=Ritchie333
|1=t
}} 13:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ]==


==Concern regarding ]==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
|doc=yes
|User=Ritchie333
|1=t
}} 14:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== The Investigation ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 05:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Hey Mr. AutoParts. I had a bit of a dispute with TreCoolGuy on the investigation page and now he'd like to be "friends after this is over". He also told me that he wants us to "prove our innocence together". Something really feels fishy here and the fact that The Nateman has still been blank about what is going on only makes my own hunch about Tre sockpuppeting again stronger. He may just be doing a bad job at trying to create a diversion. - ] (]) 01:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
::I assure you Nateman is no sockpuppet of mine. And its not a diversion, I have no affiliation with Nateman at all. - ]


==Concern regarding ]==
== Re: Redirect delete ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
It was a red link, and had been that way for over three months, but it was protected from re-creation, which is why you couldn't move it to that title. I've done the appropriate page moves. ''']'''<font color="green">]</font> 02:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 06:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for October 7==


==Concern regarding ]==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 19:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
== Vandalism ==


== "]" listed at ] ==
If you think following the infobox guidelines and removing performers who aren't in a film is vandalism, I'd like to see what you consider a normal edit. ] (]) 13:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8#Star Wars Episode VII: A New Dawn}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ''']'''<sub>&nbsp;(]•])</sub> 20:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)


==Concern regarding ]==
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
] Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 13:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 18:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:06, 9 January 2025



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

A barnstar for you

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is for your tireless contributions to Deaths in 2024. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Fairy Tale

Thanks for getting in touch. Sure, yes makes sense. Best, G Hildreth gazzard (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Ploughmen

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ploughmen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bitter Root

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bitter Root, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Denys Graham

Hi @Rusted AutoParts:, I've restored Denys Graham to the Deaths in 2024 page. Firstly, your assessment of the source "feeling a bit bloggy"... If you take a look at the home page of the website, it's abundantly clear that it's an organisation for professional actors: "Actors & Writers London (AWL) is London’s longest-running professional play-reading forum for actors and writers. It was established in 1973 at Hammersmith’s Riverside Studios and was known as Hammersmith Actors and Writers Group until July 2004." I can't see any evidence of it being a personal blog of any kind. Secondly, if you're unsure of a source and want to discuss it – and it's not one that has been previously ruled out – we have the talk section of Deaths in 2024 for that. Thanks Jkaharper (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Queen Of Fashion

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Queen Of Fashion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tokyo Ghost (film)

Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tokyo Ghost".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 22:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Invite

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Invite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Legacy.com

Hi there. I saw your update to the death date at Mike Haffner. I started a related discussion at Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § Conflicting death dates on Legacy.com that you're invited to join. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:10's regeneration.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10's regeneration.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Exit West (film)

Hello, Rusted AutoParts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Exit West".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 19:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Frank Bullitt film

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Frank Bullitt film, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Blood Runs Coal

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blood Runs Coal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fools (upcoming film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fools (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Billy Summers (film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Billy Summers (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Buried Giant (film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Buried Giant (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

"Star Wars Episode VII: A New Dawn" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Star Wars Episode VII: A New Dawn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8 § Star Wars Episode VII: A New Dawn until a consensus is reached. BOTTO (T•C) 20:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ball and Chain (upcoming film)

Information icon Hello, Rusted AutoParts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ball and Chain (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)