Revision as of 00:09, 10 June 2006 editMboverload (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,898 editsm Removed block vandal edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:00, 12 December 2024 edit undoDr Greg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers38,649 edits →Nuclear family: need to disambiguate "son" from "brother" (etc) | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Group of related people}} | |||
{{otheruses}} | |||
{{about|the group of related people|the taxonomic rank|Family (biology)|other uses}} | |||
{{Redirect-multi|2|Family life|Family member|other uses|Family Life (disambiguation)|the song|Family Member (song)}} | |||
{{CS1 config|mode=cs1}} | |||
{{Anthropology of kinship|concepts}} | |||
] family photographed by ] in 1899]] | |||
'''Family''' (from {{langx|la|familia}}) is a ] of people related either by ] (by recognized birth) or ] (by marriage or other relationship). It forms the basis for ].<ref name="Brown Brown 2014 pp. 2194–2201">{{cite book | last1=Brown | first1=Roy I. | last2=Brown | first2=Ivan | title=Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research | chapter=Family Quality of Life | publisher=Springer Netherlands | publication-place=Dordrecht | year=2014 | doi=10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1006 | pages=2194–2201 | isbn=978-94-007-0752-8 | quote=family is recognized in cultures around the world and across history as a fundamental unit of social order.}}</ref> Ideally, families offer ], structure, and safety as members mature and learn to participate in the community.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Donald Collins |author2=Catheleen Jordan |author3=Heather Coleman |title=An Introduction to Family Social Work |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SLQyPwAACAAJ |year=2010 |publisher=Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning |isbn=978-0-495-80872-5 |pages=28–29 |access-date=2019-08-13 |archive-date=2020-07-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731081508/https://books.google.com/books?id=SLQyPwAACAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> Historically, most human societies use family as the primary purpose of ], nurturance, and ].<ref>Alhussain, Khalid, Shah, Drishti, Thornton, James, Kelly, Kimberly. Familial Opioid Misuse and Family Cohesion: Impact on Family Communication and Well-being. ''Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment'' 2019;18(4):194–204. {{doi |10.1097/ADT.0000000000000165}}.</ref><ref>Lander L, Howsare J, Byrne M. The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Soc Work Public Health. 2013;28:194–205.</ref><ref name="Manzi Brambilla 2014 pp. 2167–2168">{{cite book | last1=Manzi | first1=Claudia | last2=Brambilla | first2=Maria | title=Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research | chapter=Family Connectedness | publisher=Springer Netherlands | publication-place=Dordrecht | year=2014 | doi=10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_998 | pages=2167–2168 | isbn=978-94-007-0752-8 | quote=Family connectedness is defined as a particular characteristic of the family bond, also referred as family or parental closeness, support, warmth, or responsiveness. This characteristic of the family can be observed when families maintain emotional connections with each other through encouragement of shared family celebrations, family rituals, and family traditions.}}</ref><ref name="de Jong Reis 2016 pp. 25–32">{{cite book | last1=de Jong | first1=D.C. | last2=Reis | first2=H.T. | title=Encyclopedia of Mental Health | chapter=Love and Intimacy | publisher=Elsevier | year=2016 | doi=10.1016/b978-0-12-397045-9.00107-5 | pages=25–32 | isbn=9780123977533 | quote= Central to intimacy is responsiveness, the process by which relationship partners attend to and respond supportively to each other’s wishes, needs, and concerns. Responsive interactions begin when one person discloses a core aspect of his or her self.}}</ref> | |||
]s classify most family organizations as ] (a mother and her children), ] (a father and his children), ] (a married couple with children, also called the ]), ] (a man, his sister, and her children), or ] (in addition to ], ] and ], may include ], ], ], or ]). | |||
], ] in ]]] | |||
A '''family''' consists of a domestic ] of people (or a number of domestic groups), typically affiliated by birth or marriage, or by comparable legal relationships — including domestic partnership, adoption, surname and (in some cases) ownership (as occurred in the ]). | |||
The field of ] aims to trace family lineages through history. The family is also an important economic unit studied in ]. The word "families" can be used metaphorically to create more inclusive categories such as ], ]hood, and ]. | |||
Although many people (including social scientists) have understood familial relationships in terms of "blood", many ] have argued that one must understand the notion of "blood" metaphorically, and that many societies understand 'family' through other concepts rather than through genetics. | |||
==Social== | |||
Article 16(3) of the ] says: "The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State". | |||
] medallion with a portrait of a family, from ] (]), 3rd–4th century (], ])<ref>Jás Elsner (2007). "The Changing Nature of Roman Art and the Art Historical Problem of Style," in Eva R. Hoffman (ed), ''Late Antique and Medieval Art of the Medieval World'', 11–18. Oxford, Malden & Carlton: Blackwell Publishing. {{ISBN|978-1-4051-2071-5}}, p. 17, Figure 1.3 on p. 18.</ref>]]One of the primary functions of the family involves providing a framework for the production and ] of persons biologically and socially. This can occur through the sharing of material substances (such as food); the giving and receiving of care and nurture (]); ] and obligations; also moral and sentimental ties.<ref name="Schneider p. 182">Schneider, David 1984 ''A Critique of the Study of Kinship''. Ann Arbor: ]. p. 182</ref><ref>Deleuze-Guattari (1972). Part 2, ch. 3, p. 80</ref> Thus, one's experience of one's family shifts over time. | |||
There are different perspectives of the term 'family', from the perspective of ], the family is a "family of orientation": the family serves to locate children socially and plays a major role in their ] and socialization.<ref>], (2003) ''Human Experience: Philosophy, Neurosis, and the Elements of Everyday Life'', Albany: ]. pp. 61–68.</ref> From the point of view of the parent(s), the family is a "family of ]", the goal of which is to produce, enculturate and socialize children.<ref>George Peter Murdoch ''Social Structure'' p. 13</ref> However, producing children is not the only function of the family; in societies with a ], ], and the resulting relationship between two people, it is necessary for the formation of an economically productive ].<ref>Wolf, Eric. 1982 ''Europe and the People Without History''. Berkeley: ]. 92</ref><ref>Harner, Michael 1975 "Scarcity, the Factors of Production, and Social Evolution," in ''Population, Ecology, and Social Evolution'', Steven Polgar, ed. Mouton Publishers: ].</ref><ref>Rivière, Peter 1987 "Of Women, Men, and Manioc", ''Etnologiska Studier'' (38).</ref> | |||
==The family cross-culturally== | |||
According to ] and ], the family has the primary function of reproducing — biologically, socially, or in both ways. Thus, one's experience of one's family shifts over time. From the perspective of children, the family functions as a '']'': the family serves to locate children socially, and plays a major role in their ] and socialization. From the point of view of the parent(s), the family serves as a '']'' with the goal of producing, enculturating and socializing children. | |||
C. C. Harris notes that the western conception of a family is ambiguous and confused with the ], as revealed in the different contexts in which the word is used.<ref>"We have seen that people can refer to their relatives as 'the family'. 'All the family turned up for the funeral... But of course, my brother didn't bring his family along— they're much too young.' Here the reference is to the offspring (as distinct from 'all' the family). The neighbors were very good, too. 'The Jones came, and their two children. It was nice, the whole family turning up like that.' Here the usage is more restricted than 'relatives' or 'his relatives,' but includes just both parents and offspring. 'Of course, the children will be leaving home soon. It's always sad to see the family break up like that.' Here the reference is not only to parents and children but to their co-residence, that is, to the household." The Family and Industrial Society", 1983, George Allen Unwin, London, p. 30</ref> ] states this confusion is not accidental, but indicative of the familial ideology of ], ] countries that pass social legislation that insists members of a ] should live together, and that those not so related should not live together. Despite the ideological and legal pressures, a large{{how much?|date=August 2024}} percentage of families do not conform to the ideal ] type.<ref>{{cite book |title=Of Marriage and the Market: Women's Subordination Internationally and its Lessons |publisher=Routeledge |location=London |page=138 |first=Olivia |last=Harris |editor-first1=Kate |editor-last1=Young |editor-first2=Carol |editor-last2=Wolkowitz |editor-first3=Roslyn |editor-last3=McCullagh }}</ref> | |||
Producing children, however important, does not exhaust the functions of the family. In societies with a ], ] (and the resulting relationship between a husband and wife) must precede the formation of an economically productive ]. In modern societies marriage entails particular rights and privileges that encourage the formation of new families even when participants have no intention of having children. | |||
=== |
===Size=== | ||
{{Further|Fertility factor (demography)}} | |||
The structure of families traditionally hinges on relations between parents and children, on relations between spouses, or on both. Consequently, four major types of family exist: | |||
] siblings, Montana, United States, 1937]] | |||
# patrifocal | |||
The ] of women varies from country to country, from a high rate of 6.76 children born per woman in ] to a low rate of 0.81 in ] (as of 2015).<ref name="cia.gov">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html |title=The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency |website=Cia.gov |access-date=12 April 2017 |archive-date=28 October 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091028133713/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> Fertility is ] in all ] and ] countries, and particularly high in ]n countries.<ref name="cia.gov"/> | |||
# matrifocal | |||
# consanguineal | |||
# conjugal | |||
Note: this typology deals with "ideal" families. All societies tolerate some acceptable deviations from the ideal or statistical norm, owing either to incidental circumstances (such as the death of a member of the family), to infertility or to personal preferences. | |||
In some cultures, the mother's preference of family size influences that of the children's through early adulthood.<ref name="AxinnClarkberg1994">{{cite journal |last1=Axinn |first1=William G. |last2=Clarkberg |first2=Marin E. |last3=Thornton |first3=Arland |title=Family Influences on Family Size Preferences |journal=Demography |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=65–79 |year=1994 |issn=0070-3370 |doi=10.2307/2061908|pmid=8005343 |jstor=2061908 |s2cid=7787872 |doi-access=free }}</ref> A parent's number of children strongly correlates with the number of children that their children will eventually have.<ref name="Murphy2013">{{cite journal |last1=Murphy |first1=Michael |title=Cross-National Patterns of Intergenerational Continuities in Childbearing in Developed Countries |journal=Biodemography and Social Biology |volume=59 |issue=2 |year=2013 |pages=101–126 |issn=1948-5565 |doi=10.1080/19485565.2013.833779 |pmid=24215254 |pmc=4160295 }}</ref> | |||
====Patrifocal families==== | |||
A '']'' family consists of a father and his children. It occurs in societies where ] take multiple wives (] or ]) and/or remain involved with each for a relatively short time. This type of family, not common from a worldwide perspective, occurs in Islamic states with considerable frequency. In some emirates the laws encourage this structure by allowing a maximum of four wives per man at any given time, and automatic deflection of custody rights to the father in the case of a divorce. In these societies a man will often take a wife and may conceive a child with her, but after a relatively short time put her out of his ] so he can take another woman without exceeding the quota of 4. The man then keeps his child and thus a patrifocal structure emerges. Even without the expulsion of the mother, the structure may become patrifocal because the father removes the children (often as infants) from the harem structure and places them in his own family. | |||
=={{anchor|Family types}}Types== | |||
====Matrifocal families==== | |||
] | |||
A '']'' family consists of a mother and her children — generally her biological offspring, although nearly every society also practises ] of children. This kind of family commonly develops where women have the resources to rear their children by themselves, or where men have more mobility than women. | |||
Although early western ]s and ]s considered family and ] to be universally associated with relations by "blood" (based on ideas common in their own cultures) later research<ref name="Schneider p. 182"/> has shown that many societies instead understand family through ideas of living together, the sharing of food (e.g. ]) and sharing care and ]. ]s have a special interest in the function and status of family forms in stratified (especially ]) societies.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Little |first=William |date=2014-11-06 |title=Chapter 1. An Introduction to Sociology |url=https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology/chapter/chapter1-an-introduction-to-sociology/ |language=en |journal= |access-date=2022-07-15 |archive-date=2022-07-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220715120027/https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology/chapter/chapter1-an-introduction-to-sociology/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
According to the work of scholars ], ], ], ] and ], the huge transformation that led to modern marriage in Western democracies was "fueled by the religio-cultural value system provided by elements of ], early ], ] ] and the ]".<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=3322 |website= Religion-online.org |title= The Collapse of Marriage by Don Browning – The Christian Century |date= February 7, 2006 |pages= 24–28 |access-date= 2007-07-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181232/http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=3322 |archive-date= September 30, 2007 }}</ref> | |||
====Consanguineal families==== | |||
A '']'' consists of a mother and her children, and other people — usually the family of the mother. This kind of family commonly evolves where mothers do not have the resources to rear their children on their own, and especially where property changes ownership through ]. When men own important property, consanguineal families commonly consist of a husband and wife, their children, and other members of the husband's family. | |||
Much sociological, ] and ] research dedicates itself to the understanding of this variation, and of changes in the family that form over time. Levitan claims: | |||
====Conjugal families==== | |||
A '']'' consists of one or more mothers and their children, and/or one or more spouses (usually husbands). This kind of family occurs commonly where a ] requires the participation of both men and women, and where families have relatively high mobility. A notable subset of this family type, the ], has one woman with one husband, and they raise their children. | |||
{{Blockquote|Times have changed; it is more acceptable and encouraged for mothers to work and fathers to spend more time at home with the children. The way roles are balanced between the parents will help children grow and learn valuable life lessons. There is great importance of communication and equality in families, in order to avoid role strain.<ref>{{cite web |last=Levitan |first=Sara |date=2010 |title=Working wives and mothers: what happens to family life? |url=http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1981/09/art4full.pdf |access-date=January 8, 2014 |archive-date=August 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130819042724/http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1981/09/art4full.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
== Family in the West == | |||
The different types of families occur in a wide variety of settings, and their specific functions and meanings depend largely on their relationship to other social institutions. ] have an especial interest in the function and status of these forms in stratified (especially ]) societies. | |||
=== Multigenerational family === | |||
Non-scholars, especially in the United States and Europe, use the term "]" to refer to conjugal families. Sociologists distinguish between conjugal families (relatively independent of the kindreds of the parents and of other families in general) and nuclear families (which maintain relatively close ties with their kindreds). | |||
Historically, the most common family type was one in which grandparents, parents, and children lived together as a single unit. For example, the household might include the owners of a farm, one (or more) of their adult children, the adult child's spouse, and the adult child's own children (the owners' grandchildren). Members of the extended family are not included in this family group. Sometimes, "skipped" generation families, such as a grandparents living with their grandchildren, are included.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|date=2010-03-18|title=The Return of the Multi-Generational Family Household|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2010/03/18/the-return-of-the-multi-generational-family-household/|access-date=2021-02-20|website=Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project|language=en-US|archive-date=2021-02-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228135239/https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2010/03/18/the-return-of-the-multi-generational-family-household/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
], ], Sweden, early 20th century|left]] | |||
Non-scholars, especially in the United States and Europe, also use the term "]". This term has two distinct meanings. First, it serves as a synonym of "consanguinal family". Second, in societies dominated by the conjugal family, it refers to ''']''' (an egocentric network of relatives that extends beyond the domestic group) who do not belong to the conjugal family. | |||
In the US, this arrangement declined after ], reaching a low point in 1980, when about one out of every eight people in the US lived in a multigenerational family.<ref name=":0" /> The numbers have risen since then, with one in five people in the US living in a multigenerational family as of 2016.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2018-04-05|title=Record 64 million Americans live in multigenerational households|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/05/a-record-64-million-americans-live-in-multigenerational-households/|access-date=2021-02-20|website=Pew Research Center|language=en-US|archive-date=2021-02-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210221114431/https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/05/a-record-64-million-americans-live-in-multigenerational-households/|url-status=live}}</ref> The increasing popularity is partly driven by ]s and the economic shifts associated with the ].<ref name=":0" /> | |||
These types refer to ideal or normative structures found in particular societies. Any society will exhibit some variation in the actual composition and conception of families. Much sociological, ] and ] research dedicates itself to the understanding of this variation, and of changes in the family form over time. Thus, some speak of the '''bourgeois family''', a family structure arising out of 16th-century and 17th-century European households, in which the family centers on a marriage between a man and woman, with strictly-defined gender-roles. The man typically has responsibility for income and support, the woman for home and family matters. | |||
Multigenerational households are less common in Canada, where about 6% of people living in Canada were living in multigenerational families as of 2016, but the proportion of multigenerational households was increasing rapidly, driven by increasing numbers of Aboriginal families, immigrant families, and high housing costs in some regions.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-08-02|title=The Daily — Families, households and marital status: Key results from the 2016 Census|url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/170802/dq170802a-eng.htm?HPA=1|access-date=2021-02-20|website=]|archive-date=2021-04-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415000117/https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/170802/dq170802a-eng.htm?HPA=1|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In contemporary Europe and the United States, people in academic, political and civil sectors have called attention to single-father-headed households, and families headed by ] couples, although academics point out that these forms exist in other societies. | |||
===Conjugal (nuclear) family=== | |||
] tradition places the family under the special protection of ], the patron of families, fathers, expectant mothers, house-sellers and house-buyers (in contradistinction to Saint ], patroness of wives, mothers, and abuse-victims). | |||
The term "]" is commonly used to refer to conjugal families. A "]" family includes only the spouses and unmarried children who are not of age.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth370/gloss.html|title= Definitions of Anthropological Terms|first= Court|last= Smith|website= Oregonstate.edu|access-date= 12 April 2017|archive-date= 7 February 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150207201248/http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth370/gloss.html|url-status= dead}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=June 2018}} Some sociologists{{which|date=June 2018}} distinguish between conjugal families (relatively independent of the kindred of the parents and of other families in general) and nuclear families (which maintain relatively close ties with their kindred).<ref>Compare: {{cite book | editor1-last = Scott | editor1-first = John | editor1-link = John Scott (sociologist) | title = A Dictionary of Sociology | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=2zr_AwAAQBAJ | series = Oxford paperback reference | edition = 4 | location = Oxford | publisher = Oxford University Press | date = 2014 | page = 237 | isbn = 978-0-19-968358-1 | access-date = 2018-06-30 | quote = The conjugal family refers to a family system of spouses and their dependent children. The term nuclear family is used to refer to a unit consisting of spouses and their dependent children. | archive-date = 2020-08-01 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200801133622/https://books.google.com/books?id=2zr_AwAAQBAJ | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>Compare: {{cite book | last1 = Lee | first1 = Gary R. | year = 1999 | chapter = 4: Comparative Perspectives | editor1-last = Sussman | editor1-first = Marvin B. | editor2-last = Steinmetz | editor2-first = Suzanne K. | editor3-last = Peterson | editor3-first = Gary W. | title = Handbook of Marriage and the Family | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=0GjmBwAAQBAJ | edition = 2 | location = New York | publisher = Springer Science & Business Media | publication-date = 2013 | page = 96 | isbn = 978-1-4757-5367-7 | access-date = 2018-06-30 | quote = the nuclear family (consisting of parents and dependent children) the conjugal family (defined as nuclear in structure) . | archive-date = 2020-08-01 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200801124406/https://books.google.com/books?id=0GjmBwAAQBAJ | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
] | |||
==Economic function of the family== | |||
Anthropologists have often supposed that the family in a traditional society forms the primary economic unit. This economic role has gradually diminished in modern times, and in societies like the ] it has become much smaller — except in certain sectors such as agriculture and in a few ] families. In ] the family as an economic unit still plays a strong role in the countryside. However, the relations between the economic role of the family, its socio-economic mode of production and cultural values remain highly complex. | |||
Other family structures – with (for example) ], ]s, and ]s – have begun to challenge the normality of the nuclear family.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/22/less-than-half-of-u-s-kids-today-live-in-a-traditional-family/|title= Fewer than half of U.S. kids today live in a 'traditional' family|date= 22 December 2014|website= Pewresearch.org|access-date= 12 April 2017|archive-date= 11 April 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170411223443/http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/22/less-than-half-of-u-s-kids-today-live-in-a-traditional-family/|url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1= Staff writers|title= The Kids will be alright, even without the Nuclear Family|url= https://psmag.com/the-kids-will-be-all-right-even-without-the-nuclear-family-d658459112ad|access-date= 22 April 2017|publisher= Pacific Standard magazine|date= March 2014|archive-date= 30 July 2022|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220730072626/https://psmag.com/social-justice/kids-will-right-even-without-nuclear-family-74877|url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1= Bryant|first1= L.E. |title= Encyclopedia of Family Studies |date= March 2016|pages= 1–3 |doi= 10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs490 |chapter= Nuclear Families |isbn= 978-0-470-65845-1 }}</ref> | |||
] ]ern U.S. family of Danish/German extraction]] | |||
===Single-parent family=== | |||
==Families and other sociological institutions== | |||
A '']'' consists of one parent together with their children, where the parent is either widowed, divorced (and not remarried), or never married.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Dowd |first1=Nancy E. |title=In Defence of Single Parent Families |date=1997 |publisher=New York University Press |location=New York and London |isbn=0-8147-1869-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1Zc-AAAAQBAJ&dq=single+parent+families&pg=PR3 |access-date=19 November 2022}}</ref> The parent may have ] of the children, or separated parents may have a ] arrangement where the children divide their time (possibly equally) between two different single-parent families or between one single-parent family and one ]. As compared to sole custody, physical, mental and social well-being of children may be improved by shared-parenting arrangements and by children having greater access to both parents.<ref>Sanford L. Braver and Michael E. Lamb, , ''Journal of Divorce & Remarriage'', April 2018: "The empirical evidence currently available supports the view that children of divorce, on average, benefit substantially from SP arrangements in which they live with each parent at least 35% of the time. Findings from well over 50 individual studies indicate that children whose parents have SP fare better than those with sole physical custody ."</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Baude |first1=Amandine |last2=Pearson |first2=Jessica |last3=Drapeau |first3=Sylvie |title=Child Adjustment in Joint Physical Custody Versus Sole Custody: A Meta-Analytic Review |journal=Journal of Divorce & Remarriage |date=27 June 2016 |volume=57 |issue=5 |pages=338–360 |doi=10.1080/10502556.2016.1185203|s2cid=147782279 }}</ref> The number of single-parent families have been increasing due to the divorce rate climbing drastically during the years 1965–1995, and about half of all children in the United States will live in a single-parent family at some point before they reach the age of 18. Most single-parent families are headed by a mother, but the number of single-parent families headed by fathers is increasing.<ref>American Psychological Association, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190130221000/https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/single-parent.aspx |date=2019-01-30 }}</ref><ref>Kathryn M. Feltey, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190131040033/https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-and-social-reform/sociology-general-terms-and-concepts/single-parent-families |date=2019-01-31 }}, International Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family</ref> | |||
Wherever people agree that families seem fundamental to the ordered nature of ], other ]s such as the ] and organised ] will make special provisions for families and will support (in word and/or in deed) the idea of the family. This can however lead to problems if conflicting loyalties arise. Thus the Biblical prescription: "every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive a hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life" (Matthew 19, 29). Totalitarian states also can develop ambiguous attitudes to families, which they may perceive as potentially interfering with the fostering of official ideology and practice. Different attitudes to ] and to denunciation may develop in this light. | |||
===Matrifocal family=== | |||
{{Main|Matrifocal family}} | |||
A "matrifocal" family consists of a ] and her children.<ref name="Randolph 1964 628–631">{{Cite journal |last=Randolph |first=Richard R. |date=1964 |title=The "Matrifocal Family" as a Comparative Category |journal=American Anthropologist |volume=66 |issue=3 |pages=628–631 |doi=10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00130 |jstor=668860 |issn=0002-7294 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Generally, these children are her biological offspring, although adoption of children occurs in nearly every society. This kind of family occurs commonly where women have the resources to rear their children by themselves, or where men are more ] than women. As a definition, "a family or domestic group is matrifocal when it is centred on a woman and her children. In this case, the father(s) of these children are intermittently present in the life of the group and occupy a secondary place. The children's mother is not necessarily the wife of one of the children's fathers."<ref> | |||
Godelier, Maurice, trans. Nora Scott, ''The Metamorphoses of Kinship'' (London: Verso, 2011 ({{ISBN|978-1-84467-746-7}})), p. 568 (''Glossary'', entry ''matrifocal'') (trans. from ''Métamorphoses de la parenté'' (Librarie Arthème Fayard (apparently), 2004)) (author prof. anthropology, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris). | |||
</ref> The name, matrifocal, was coined in Guiana but it is defined differently in other countries. For Nayar families, the family have the male as the "center" or the head of the family, either the step-father/father/brother, rather than the mother.<ref name="Randolph 1964 628–631"/> | |||
===Extended family=== | |||
] family eating a meal]] | |||
]]] | |||
] | |||
The term "]" is also common, especially in the United States. This term has two distinct meanings: | |||
# It serves as a synonym of "consanguineal family" (consanguine means "of the same blood"). | |||
# In societies dominated by the conjugal family, it refers to "]" (an egocentric network of relatives that extends beyond the domestic group) who do not belong to the conjugal family. | |||
These types refer to ideal or normative structures found in particular societies. Any society will exhibit some variation in the actual composition and conception of families.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Little |first=William |date=2014-11-06 |title=Chapter 4. Society and Social Interaction |url=https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology/chapter/chapter4-society-and-social-interaction/ |language=en |access-date=2022-07-18 |archive-date=2022-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220521004316/https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology/chapter/chapter4-society-and-social-interaction/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Historically, '']'' were the basic family unit in the ] and ] (such as ] and ]),<ref name="Pritchard 2006">{{cite book|title=Mental Health Social Work: Evidence-Based Practice| first= Colin Pritchard|last=Pritchard|year= 2006| isbn= 978-1134365449| page =111 |publisher=Routledge|quote=in cultures with stronger 'extended family traditions', such as Asian and Catholic countries}}</ref> and in Asian, ] and ] countries.<ref name="Pritchard 2006"/> | |||
=== Family of choice === | |||
The term ], also sometimes referred to as "chosen family" or "found family", is common within the ], veterans, individuals who have suffered abuse, and those who have no contact with their biological parents. It refers to the group of people in an individual's life that satisfies the typical role of family as a support system. The term differentiates between the "family of origin" (the biological family or that in which people are raised) and those that actively assume that ideal role.<ref>{{Cite web |url= http://www.algbtical.org/2A%20GLOSSARY.htm |title= ALGBTICAL LGBT Glossary of Terminology |date= 2005–2006 |website= ALGBTICAL Association for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Issues in Counseling of Alabama |access-date= May 4, 2016 |archive-date= May 6, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160506160448/http://www.algbtical.org/2A%20GLOSSARY.htm |url-status= dead }}</ref> | |||
The family of choice may or may not include some or all of the members of the family of origin. This family is not one that follows the "normal" familial structure like having a father, a mother, and children. This is family as a group of people that rely on each other like a family of origin would.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dewaele |first1=Alexis |last2=Cox |first2=Nele |last3=Van den Berghe |first3=Wim |last4=Vincke |first4=John |date=February 2011 |title=Families of Choice? Exploring the Supportive Networks of Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals1: FAMILIES OF CHOICE |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00715.x |journal=Journal of Applied Social Psychology |language=en |volume=41 |issue=2 |pages=312–331 |doi=10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00715.x |access-date=2022-05-04 |archive-date=2022-05-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220504034706/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00715.x |url-status=live }}</ref> This terminology stems from the fact that many ] individuals, upon ], face rejection or shame from the families they were raised in.<ref name="Stitt">{{Cite book|title=ACT For Gender Identity: The Comprehensive Guide |last=Stitt |first=Alex |pages=372–376|date=2020 |publisher=Jessica Kingsley Publishers|isbn=978-1785927997 |location=London|oclc=1089850112}}</ref> The term family of choice is also used by individuals in the 12 step communities, who create close-knit "family" ties through the recovery process. | |||
As a family system, families of choice face unique issues. Without legal safeguards, families of choice may struggle when medical, educational or governmental institutions fail to recognize their legitimacy.<ref name="Stitt"/> If members of the chosen family have been disowned by their family of origin, they may experience surrogate grief, displacing anger, loss, or anxious attachment onto their new family.<ref name="Stitt"/> | |||
===Blended family=== | |||
The term ''blended family'' or '']'' describes families with mixed parents: one or both parents remarried, bringing children of the former family into the new family.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171104161546/http://www.familylife.com/articles/topics/blended-family |date=2017-11-04 }} – Encouraging Step-Families, blendedandblessed.com</ref> Also in sociology, particularly in the works of social psychologist ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sdp.cam.ac.uk/contacts/staff/profiles/mlamb.html |title=Department of Social and Developmental Psychology: PPSIS Faculty, Academic Profile |website=Sdp.cam.ac.uk |access-date=2011-03-26 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111125163148/http://www.sdp.cam.ac.uk/contacts/staff/profiles/mlamb.html |archive-date=2011-11-25 }}</ref> ''traditional family'' refers to "a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children," and ''nontraditional'' to exceptions to this rule. Most of the US households are now non-traditional under this definition.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101225193923/http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/gill-v-office-of-personnel-management/2009-11-17-doma-aff-lamb.pdf |date=2010-12-25 }} paragraph 17</ref> Critics of the term "traditional family" point out that in most cultures and at most times, the ] model has been most common, not the nuclear family,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/05/13/610777733/parenting-myths-and-facts|title=Parenting Myths And Facts|website=NPR.org|access-date=2018-05-14|archive-date=2019-04-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413132941/https://www.npr.org/2018/05/13/610777733/parenting-myths-and-facts|url-status=live}}</ref> though it has had a longer tradition in England<ref>see {{section link|History of the family|Evolution of household}}</ref> than in other parts of Europe and Asia which contributed large numbers of immigrants to the Americas. The nuclear family became the most common form in the U.S. in the 1960s and 1970s.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2015-06-23|title=The Evolution of American Family Structure|url=https://online.csp.edu/blog/family-science/the-evolution-of-american-family-structure/|access-date=2021-06-10|website=Concordia University, St. Paul Online|language=en-US|archive-date=2021-06-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210610091111/https://online.csp.edu/blog/family-science/the-evolution-of-american-family-structure/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In terms of communication patterns in families, there are a certain set of beliefs within the family that reflect how its members should communicate and interact. These family communication patterns arise from two underlying sets of beliefs. One being conversation orientation (the degree to which the importance of communication is valued) and two, conformity orientation (the degree to which families should emphasize similarities or differences regarding attitudes, beliefs, and values).<ref>{{cite book |last=McCornack |first=Steven |title=Reflect & Relate an introduction to interpersonal communication |year=2010 |publisher=Bedford/St. Martin's |location=Boston/NY |pages=369–370}}</ref> | |||
Blended families is complex, ranging from stepfamilies to cohabitating families (an individual living with guardians who are not married with step or half siblings). While it is not too different from stepfamilies, cohabiting families pose a prevalent psychological effect on youths.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Portrie |first1=Torey |last2=Hill |first2=Nicole R. |date=October 2005 |title=Blended Families: A Critical Review of the Current Research |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1066480705279014 |journal=The Family Journal |language=en |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=445–451 |doi=10.1177/1066480705279014 |s2cid=32353012 |issn=1066-4807 |access-date=2022-05-04 |archive-date=2022-05-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220504041610/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1066480705279014 |url-status=live }}</ref> Some adolescents would be prone to "acts of delinquency," and experiencing problems in school ranging from a decrease in academic performance to increased problematic behavior. It coincides with other researches on the trajectories of stepfamilies where some experienced familyhood, but others lacking connection. Emotional detachment from members within stepfamilies contributes to this uncertainty, furthering the tension that these families may establish.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Braithwaite |first1=Dawn |last2=Olson |first2=Loreen |last3=Golish |first3=Tamara |last4=Soukup |first4=Charles |last5=Turman |first5=Paul |date=2001-01-01 |title="Becoming a family": developmental processes represented in blended family discourse |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128112 |journal=Journal of Applied Communication Research |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=221–247 |doi=10.1080/00909880128112 |s2cid=14220043 |issn=0090-9882}}</ref> The transition from an old family to a new family that falls under blended families would also become problematic as the activities that were once performed in the old family may not transfer well within the new family for adolescents.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Braithwaite |first1=Dawn O. |last2=Baxter |first2=Leslie A. |last3=Harper |first3=Anneliese M. |date=1998-06-01 |title=The role of rituals in the management of the dialectical tension of "old" and "new" in blended families |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368523 |journal=Communication Studies |volume=49 |issue=2 |pages=101–120 |doi=10.1080/10510979809368523 |issn=1051-0974 |access-date=2022-05-04 |archive-date=2022-07-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730072634/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10510979809368523 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Monogamous family=== | |||
A monogamous family is based on a legal or social ]. In this case, an individual has only one (official) partner during their lifetime or at any one time (i.e. ]).<ref name="BRIT">Cf. "Monogamy" in ''Britannica World Language Dictionary'', R.C. Preble (ed.), Oxford-London 1962, p. 1275:''1. The practice or principle of marrying only once. opp. to digamy now ''rare'' 2. The condition, rule or custom of being married to only one ] at a time (opp. to polygamy or bigamy) 1708. 3. ] The habit of living in pairs, or having only one mate''; The same text repeats ''The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary'', W. Little, H.W. Fowler, J. Coulson (ed.), C.T. Onions (rev. ed.) Oxford 1969, 3rd edition, vol. 1, p. 1275; . March 2010. Oxford University Press. 23 Jun. 2010 Cf. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150623232650/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monogamy |date=2015-06-23 }} in Merriam-Webster Dictionary</ref> This means that a person may not have several different legal spouses at the same time, as this is usually prohibited by ] laws, (the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another<ref>{{Cite Merriam-Webster|bigamy}} | |||
</ref>) in jurisdictions that require monogamous marriages. | |||
===Polygamous family=== | |||
], Australia, 1904]] | |||
] is a marriage that includes more than two partners.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.scienceofrelationships.com/home/2012/8/17/opening-up-challenging-myths-about-consensual-non-monogamy.html |title=Opening Up: Challenging Myths about Consensual Non-Monogamy |website=Scienceofrelationships.com|access-date=12 April 2017 |date=2012-08-17|archive-date=2017-04-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170404174445/http://www.scienceofrelationships.com/home/2012/8/17/opening-up-challenging-myths-about-consensual-non-monogamy.html|url-status=live}}</ref>{{sfnp|Zeitzen|2008|p=3}} When a man is married to more than one wife at a time, the relationship is called ]; and when a woman is married to more than one husband at a time, it is called ]. If a marriage includes multiple husbands and wives, it can be called ],<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = McCullough | first1 = Derek | last2 = Hall | first2 = David S. | title = Polyamory – What it is and what it isn't | journal = ] | volume = 6 | date = February 27, 2003 | url = http://www.ejhs.org/volume6/polyamory.htm | access-date = March 14, 2015 | archive-date = December 10, 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201210093927/http://www.ejhs.org/volume6/polyamory.htm | url-status = live }}</ref> ].{{sfnp|Zeitzen|2008|p=3}} | |||
] is a form of plural marriage, in which a man is allowed more than one wife.{{sfnp|Zeitzen|2008|p=9}} In modern countries that permit polygamy, polygyny is typically the only form permitted. Polygyny is practiced primarily (but not only) in parts of the Middle East and Africa; and is often associated with ], however, there are certain conditions in Islam that must be met to perform polygyny.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://study.com/learn/lesson/polygamy-polygyny-polyandry-group-marriage.html |access-date=2022-07-18 |website=study.com |title=Polygamy | Polygyny, Polyandry & Group Marriage – Video & Lesson Transcript |archive-date=2022-07-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730072635/https://study.com/learn/lesson/polygamy-polygyny-polyandry-group-marriage.html |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] is a form of marriage whereby a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time.<ref name="Starkweather/Hames 2012">{{cite journal |last1=Starkweather |first1=Katherine E. |last2=Hames |first2=Raymond |title=A survey of non-classical polyandry |journal=] |volume=23 |issue=2 |pages=149–172 |doi=10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x |pmid=22688804 |date=June 2012 |s2cid=2008559 |url=http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=anthropologyfacpub |access-date=2018-11-14 |archive-date=2019-12-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191204020235/http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=anthropologyfacpub |url-status=live}}</ref> Fraternal polyandry, where two or more brothers are married to the same wife, is a common form of polyandry. Polyandry was traditionally practiced in areas of the Himalayan mountains, among Tibetans in ], in parts of China and in parts of northern India. Polyandry is most common in societies marked by high male mortality or where males will often be apart from the rest of the family for a considerable period of time.<ref name="Starkweather/Hames 2012"/> | |||
==Kinship terminology== | ==Kinship terminology== | ||
A ''] terminology'' describes a specific system of familial relationships. The ] rather dated anthropologist ] (1818 - 1881) argued that kinship terminologies reflect different sets of distinctions. For example, most kinship terminologies distinguish between sexes (the difference between a brother and a sister) and between generations (the difference between a child and a parent). Moreover, he argued, kinship terminologies distinguish between relatives by blood and ] (although recently some anthropologists have argued that many societies define kinship in terms other than "blood"). | |||
===Degrees of kinship=== | |||
However, Morgan also observed that different languages (and thus, societies) organize these distinctions differently. He thus proposed to describe kin terms and terminologies as either descriptive or classificatory. "Descriptive" terms refer to only one type of relationship, while "classificatory" terms refer to many types of relationships. Most kinship terminologies include both descriptive and classificatory terms. For example, Western societies provide only one way to express relationship with one's brother (brother = parents' son); thus, in Western society, the word "brother" functions as a descriptive term. But many different ways exist to express relationship with one's male first-cousin (cousin = mother's brother's son, mother's sister's son, father's brother's son, father's sister's son, and so on); thus, in Western society, the word "cousin" operates as a classificatory term. | |||
{{main|Coefficient of relationship}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
A first-degree relative is one who shares 50% of your DNA through direct inheritance, such as a full sibling, parent or progeny. | |||
There is another measure for the degree of relationship, which is determined by counting up generations to the first common ancestor and back down to the target individual, which is used for various genealogical and legal purposes.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Family |url=https://hy.w3we.com/Grandchild |access-date=2022-07-18 |website=hy.w3we.com |language=hy |archive-date=2022-07-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220718091920/https://hy.w3we.com/Grandchild |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Morgan discovered that a descriptive term in one society can become a classificatory term in another society. For example, in some societies one would refer to many different people as "mother" (the woman who gave birth to oneself, as well as her sister and husband's sister, and also one's father's sister). Moreover, some societies do not lump together relatives that the West classifies together. For example, some languages have no one word equivalent to "cousin", because different terms refer to mother's sister's children and to father's sister's children. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
Armed with these different terms, Morgan identified six basic patterns of kinship terminologies: | |||
|- | |||
! Kinship | |||
! Degree of relationship <br />by coefficient | |||
! ] | |||
! Degree of relationship <br />by counting generations to common ancestor | |||
|- | |||
| identical twins || 0 || 100%<ref>By replacement in the definition of the notion of "generation" by ]". Since identical twins are not separated by meiosis, there are no "generations" between them, hence ''n''=0 and ''r''=1. See {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224210418/http://www.genetic-genealogy.co.uk/Toc115570135.html |date=2021-02-24 }}.</ref> || second-degree | |||
|- | |||
| sister / brother || first-degree || 50% (2×2<sup>−2</sup>) || second-degree | |||
|- | |||
| mother / father / daughter / son<ref>{{cite web|url=http://taumoda.com/web/PD/library/kin.html|title=Kin Selection|publisher=Benjamin/Cummings|access-date=2007-11-25|archive-date=2015-05-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150517065247/http://www.taumoda.com/web/PD/library/kin.html|url-status=live}}</ref> || first-degree || 50% (2<sup>−1</sup>) || first-degree | |||
|- | |||
| half-sister / half-brother || second-degree || 25% (2<sup>−2</sup>) || second-degree | |||
|- | |||
| grandmother / grandfather / granddaughter / grandson || second-degree || 25% (2<sup>−2</sup>) || second-degree | |||
|- | |||
| aunt / uncle / niece / nephew || second-degree || 25% (2×2<sup>−3</sup>) || third-degree | |||
|- | |||
| half-aunt / half-uncle / half-niece / half-nephew || third-degree || 12.5% (2<sup>−3</sup>) || third-degree | |||
|- | |||
| first-cousin || third-degree || 12.5% (2×2<sup>−4</sup>) || fourth-degree | |||
|- | |||
| half-first-cousin || fourth-degree || 6.25% (2<sup>−4</sup>) || fourth-degree | |||
|- | |||
| great-grandmother / great-grandfather / great-granddaughter / great-grandson || third-degree || 12.5% (2<sup>−3</sup>) || third-degree | |||
|- | |||
| first-cousin-once-removed || fourth-degree || 6.25% (2⋅2<sup>−5</sup>) || fifth-degree | |||
|- | |||
| second-cousin ||fifth-degree || 3.125% (2<sup>−6</sup>+2<sup>−6</sup>) || sixth-degree | |||
|} | |||
===Terminologies=== | |||
*]: the most classificatory; only distinguishes between sex and generation. | |||
{{Main|Kinship terminology}} | |||
*]: the most descriptive; no two relatives share the same term. | |||
] | |||
*]: has both classificatory and descriptive terms; in addition to sex and generation, also distinguishes between lineal relatives (those related directly by a line of descent) and collateral relatives (those related by blood, but not directly in the line of descent). Lineal relatives have highly descriptive terms, collateral relatives have highly classificatory terms. | |||
] | |||
*]: has both classificatory and descriptive terms; in addition to sex and generation, also distinguishes between siblings of opposite sexes in the parental generation. Siblings of the same sex class as blood relatives, but siblings of the opposite sex count as relatives by marriage. Thus, one calls one's mother's sister "mother", and one's father's brother "father"; however, one refers to one's mother's brother as "father-in-law", and to one's father's sister as "mother-in-law". | |||
] | |||
*]: like Iroquois, but further distinguishes between mother's side and father's side. Relatives on the mother's side of the family have more descriptive terms, and relatives on the father's side have more classificatory terms. | |||
] | |||
*]: like Iroquois, but further distinguishes between mother's side and father's side. Relatives on the mother's side of the family have more classificatory terms, and relatives on the father's side have more descriptive terms. | |||
In his book '']'', anthropologist ] (1818–1881) performed the first survey of kinship terminologies in use around the world. Although much of his work is now considered dated, he argued that ] terminologies reflect different sets of distinctions. For example, most kinship terminologies distinguish between sexes (the difference between a brother and a sister) and between generations (the difference between a child and a parent). Moreover, he argued, kinship terminologies distinguish between relatives by blood and ] (although recently some anthropologists have argued that many societies define kinship in terms other than "blood"). | |||
Societies in different parts of the world and using different languages may share the same basic terminology patterns; in such cases one can very easily translate the kinship terms of one language into another, although connotations may vary. But translators usually find it impossible to translate directly the kinship terms of a society that uses one system into the language of a society that uses a different system. | |||
Morgan made a distinction between kinship systems that use ''classificatory'' terminology and those that use ''descriptive'' terminology. Classificatory systems are generally and erroneously understood to be those that "class together" with a single term relatives who actually do not have the same type of relationship to ego. (What defines "same type of relationship" under such definitions seems to be genealogical relationship. This is problematic given that any genealogical description, no matter how standardized, employs words originating in a folk understanding of kinship.) What Morgan's terminology actually differentiates are those (classificatory) kinship systems that do not distinguish lineal and collateral relationships and those (descriptive) kinship systems that do. Morgan, a lawyer, came to make this distinction in an effort to understand ] inheritance practices. A Seneca man's effects were inherited by his sisters' children rather than by his own children.<ref>Tooker, Elisabeth. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180922140118/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2741877 |date=2018-09-22 }} ''Current Anthropology'' 20, no. 1 (March 1979): 131–134.</ref> Morgan identified six basic patterns of kinship terminologies: | |||
Some languages, such as ], ], and ], add another dimension to some relations: relative age. There exist, for example, different words for "older brother" and "younger brother". Thus, although Westerners may "naturally" agree with Morgan in seeing the term "brother" as descriptive rather than classificatory, speakers of these languages might disagree. | |||
* ]: only distinguishes relatives based upon sex and generation. | |||
* ]: no two relatives share the same term. | |||
* ]: in addition to distinguishing relatives based upon sex and generation, also distinguishes between lineal relatives and collateral relatives. | |||
* ]: in addition to sex and generation, also distinguishes between siblings of opposite sexes in the parental generation. | |||
* ]: a matrilineal system with some features of an Iroquois system, but with a "skewing" feature in which generation is "frozen" for some relatives. | |||
* ]: like a Crow system but patrilineal. | |||
==Roles== | |||
Other languages, such as ], have reciprocal terms. So, a Chiricahua child (male or female) calls her paternal grandmother ''-ch’iné'' and likewise this grandmother will call her son's child ''-ch’iné''. | |||
{{redirect|Grandson}} | |||
] {{Circa|1900}}: Father, mother, three sons and two daughters.]] | |||
] with grandchild, 1900]] | |||
] | |||
Most Western societies employ ] terminology.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Systematic Kinship Terminologies |url=https://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/anthropology/tutor/kinterms/termsys.html |access-date=2022-07-18 |website=www.umanitoba.ca |archive-date=2019-12-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191224152852/http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/anthropology/tutor/kinterms/termsys.html |url-status=live }}</ref> This kinship terminology commonly occurs in societies with strong ], where families have a degree of relative mobility. Typically, societies with conjugal families also favor ] residence; thus upon marriage, a person separates from the nuclear family of their childhood (family of orientation) and forms a new nuclear family (family of procreation). Such systems generally assume that the mother's husband is also the biological father. The system uses highly descriptive terms for the nuclear family and progressively more ] as the relatives become more and more collateral. | |||
===English kinship terminology=== | |||
] | |||
===Nuclear family=== | |||
{{seealso|Cousin chart}} | |||
{{Main|Nuclear family}} | |||
] in 1875]] | |||
] (''right'') in 1906]] | |||
The system emphasizes the nuclear family. Members of the nuclear family use highly descriptive kinship terms, identifying directly only the husband, wife, mother, father, son, daughter, brother, and sister. All other relatives are grouped together into categories. Members of the nuclear family may be lineal or collateral. Kin, for whom these are family, refer to them in descriptive terms that build on the terms used within the nuclear family or use the nuclear family term directly. | |||
Nuclear family of orientation | |||
Most Western societies employ English-style kinship terminology. This kinship terminology commonly occurs in societies based on conjugal (or nuclear) families, where nuclear families have a degree of relatively mobility. | |||
* ''']''': the male child of a parent. | |||
* ''']''': the female child of a parent. | |||
* ''']''': a male parent. | |||
** ''']''': the father of a parent. | |||
* ''']''': a female parent. | |||
** ''']''': the mother of a parent. | |||
Nuclear conjugal family | |||
Members of the nuclear family use descriptive kinship terms: | |||
*''']''': |
* ''']''': a male spouse. | ||
*''']''': |
* ''']''': a female spouse. | ||
*''']''': |
* ''']''': a male child of the subject. | ||
** '''Grandson''': a child's son. | |||
*''']''': the females born of the mother; sired by the father | |||
*''']''': a |
* ''']''': a female child of the subject. | ||
** '''Granddaughter''': a child's daughter. | |||
*''']''': a female born of the same mother; sired by the same father | |||
Nuclear non-lineal family | |||
Such systems generally assume that the mother's husband has also served as the ]. In some families, a woman may have children with more than one man or a man may have children with more than one woman. The system refers to a child who shares only one parent with another child as a "half-brother" or "half-sister". For children who do not share biological or adoptive parents in common, English-speakers use the term "step-brother" or "step-sister" to refer to their new relationship with each other when one of their biological parents marries one of the other child's biological parents. | |||
* ''']''': husband or wife | |||
** ''']''': a spouse of a parent that is not a biological parent | |||
Any person (other than the biological parent of a child) who marries the parent of that child becomes the "step-parent" of the child, either the "stepmother" or "stepfather". The same terms generally apply to children adopted into a family as to children born into the family. | |||
* '''Sibling''': sister or brother | |||
** ''']''': a sibling with whom the subject shares only one biological parent | |||
** ''']''': a child of a parent that is not a biological parent | |||
===Collateral relatives=== | |||
Typically, societies with conjugal families also favor ] residence; thus upon marriage a person separates from the nuclear family of their childhood (family of orientation) and forms a new nuclear family (family of procreation). This practice means that members of one's own nuclear family once functioned as members of another nuclear family, or may one day become members of another nuclear family. | |||
A sibling is a collateral relative with a minimal removal. For collateral relatives with one additional removal, one generation more distant from a common ancestor on one side, more classificatory terms come into play. These terms (], ], ], and ]) do not build on the terms used within the nuclear family as most are not traditionally members of the household. These terms do not traditionally differentiate between a collateral relatives and a person married to a collateral relative (both collateral and aggregate). Collateral relatives with additional removals on each side are ]s. This is the most classificatory term and can be distinguished by '''degrees of collaterality''' and by generation ('''removal'''). | |||
When only the subject has the additional removal, the relative is the subject's parents' siblings, the terms '''Aunt''' and '''Uncle''' are used for female and male relatives respectively. When only the relative has the additional removal, the relative is the subjects siblings child, the terms '''Niece''' and '''Nephew''' are used for female and male relatives respectively. The spouse of a biological aunt or uncle is an aunt or uncle, and the nieces and nephews of a spouse are nieces and nephews. With further removal by the subject for aunts and uncles and by the relative for nieces and nephews the prefix "grand-" modifies these terms. With further removal the prefix becomes "great-grand-," adding another "great-" for each additional generation. For large numbers of generations a number can be substituted, for example, "fourth great-grandson", "four-greats grandson" or "four-times-great-grandson". | |||
Members of the nuclear families of members of one's own (former) nuclear family may class as lineal or as collateral. Kin who regard them as lineal refer to them in terms that build on the terms used within the nuclear family: | |||
*] | |||
**'''Grandfather''': a parent's father | |||
**'''Grandmother''': a parent's mother | |||
*'''Grandson''': a child's son | |||
*'''Granddaughter''': a child's daughter | |||
When the subject and the relative have an additional removal they are cousins. A cousin with minimal removal is a first cousin, i.e. the child of the subjects uncle or aunt. '''Degrees of collaterality''' and '''removals''' are used to more precisely describe the relationship between cousins. The '''degree''' is the number of generations subsequent to the common ancestor before a parent of one of the cousins is found, while the '''removal''' is the difference between the number of generations from each cousin to the common ancestor (the difference between the generations the cousins are from).<ref name="DictGen">{{cite encyclopedia |title =A Dictionary of Genetics |year =2013 |publisher =Oxford University Press |id =8}}</ref><ref name="DictWebster">{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cousin |title=Definition of Cousin |publisher=Merriam-Webster |access-date=2020-04-20 |archive-date=2021-02-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210201164904/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cousin |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
For collateral relatives, more classificatory terms come into play, terms that do not build on the terms used within the nuclear family: | |||
*'''Uncle''': father's brother, father's sister's husband, mother's brother, mother's sister's husband | |||
*'''Aunt''': father's sister, father's brother's wife, mother's sister, mother's brother's wife | |||
*'''Nephew''': sister's son, brother's son | |||
*'''Niece''': sister's daughter, brother's daughter | |||
When additional generations intervene (in other words, when one's collateral relatives belong to the same generation as one's grandparents or grandchildren), the prefix "great" modifies these terms. | |||
Cousins of an older generation (in other words, one's parents' first cousins), although technically first cousins once removed, are often classified with "aunts" and "uncles". | |||
Most collateral relatives have never had membership of the nuclear family of the members of one's own nuclear family. | |||
*'''Cousin''': the most classificatory term; the children of aunts or uncles. One can further distinguish cousins by degrees of collaterality and by generation. Two persons of the same generation who share a grandparent count as "first cousins" (one degree of collaterality); if they share a great-grandparent they count as "second cousins" (two degrees of collaterality) and so on. If two persons share an ancestor, one as a grandchild and the other as a great-grandchild of that individual, then the two descendants class as "first cousins once removed" (removed by one generation); if the shared ancestor figures as the grandparent of one individual and the great-great-grandparent of the other, the individuals class as "first cousins twice removed" (removed by two generations), and so on. Similarly, if the shared ancestor figures as the great-grandparent of one person and the great-great-grandparent of the other, the individuals class as "second cousins once removed". Hence the phrase "third cousin once removed upwards". | |||
===Aggregate relatives=== | |||
Distant cousins of an older generation (in other words, one's parents' first cousins), though technically first cousins once removed, often get classified with "aunts" and "uncles". | |||
English-speakers mark relationships by marriage (except for wife/husband) with the tag "-in-law". The mother and father of one's spouse become one's mother-in-law and father-in-law; the wife of one's son becomes one's daughter-in-law and the husband of one's daughter becomes one's son-in-law. The term "]" refers to two essentially different relationships, either the wife of one's brother, or the sister of one's spouse. "]" is the husband of one's sister, or the brother of one's spouse. The terms "half-brother" and "half-sister" indicate siblings who share only one biological parent. The term "]" refers to the aunt of one's spouse. "]" is the uncle of one's spouse. "]" is the spouse of one's cousin, or the cousin of one's spouse. The term "]" refers to the wife of one's nephew. "]" is the husband of one's niece. The grandmother and grandfather of one's spouse become one's grandmother-in-law and grandfather-in-law; the wife of one's grandson becomes one's granddaughter-in-law and the husband of one's granddaughter becomes one's grandson-in-law. | |||
In ], a sibling in law who is the spouse of your sibling can be referred to as a co-sibling (specificity a co-sister<ref name="Ca-CoS">{{cite web |title=Co-Sister |url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/co-sister |website=Cambridge Dictionary |access-date=18 April 2020 |archive-date=13 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210113011221/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/co-sister |url-status=live }}</ref> or co-brother<ref name="Ca-CoB">{{cite web |title=Co-Brother |url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/co-brother |website=Cambridge Dictionary |access-date=18 April 2020 |archive-date=25 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225083600/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/co-brother |url-status=live }}</ref>). | |||
Similarly, a person may refer to close friends of one's parents as "aunt" or "uncle", or may refer to close friends as "brother" or "sister", using the practice of ''']'''. | |||
==Types of kinship== | |||
English-speakers mark relationships by marriage (except for wife/husband) with the tag "-in-law". The mother and father of one's spouse become one's mother-in-law and father-in-law; the female spouse of one's child becomes one's daughter-in-law and the male spouse of one's child becomes one's son-in-law. The term "sister-in-law" refers to three essentially different relationships, either the wife of one's brother, or the sister of one's spouse, or the wife of one's spouse's sibling. "Brother-in-law" expresses a similar ambiguity. No special terms exist for the rest of one's spouse's family. | |||
===Patrilineal=== | |||
The terms "half-brother" and "half-sister" indicate siblings who one share only one biological or adoptive parent. | |||
], also known as ''the male line'' or ''agnatic kinship'', is a form of kinship system in which an individual's family membership derives from and is traced through his or her father's ].<ref>Benokraitis, N.V. ''Marriages and Families.'' 7th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., 2011</ref> It generally involves the ] of property, rights, names, or titles by persons related through ] kin. | |||
A patriline ("father line") is a person's father, and additional ]s that are traced only through males. One's patriline is thus a record of descent from a man in which the individuals in all intervening generations are male. In ], a patrilineage is a ] male and female ], each of whose members is descended from the common ancestor through male forebears. | |||
Specific distinctions vary among Western societies. For instance, in French, the prefix ''beau-'' or ''belle-'' equates to both "-in-law" and "step-"; in other words, the term ''belle-soeur'' could refer to the sister of one's spouse, the wife of one's sibling, the wife of one's spouse's sibling, or the daughter of one's parent's spouse. In Spanish, each of the roles that English creates with the suffix "-in-law" has a different word (''suegros'' parents-in-law, ''yerno'' son-in-law, ''nuera'' daughter-in-law, ''cuñados'' siblings-in-law), but a separate suffix ''-astro'' or ''-astra'' equates to "step-". In Swedish, terms for grandparents differ on the mother's and father's sides: ''mormor'' and ''morfar'' ("mother-mother", "mother-father") as opposed to ''farfar'' and ''farmor'' ("father-father", "father-mother"). In Dutch, there no difference is made between nephews and male cousins, or nieces and female cousins. Unlike English, however, there is a difference between sexes of cousins. Nephews and male cousins are indicated using ''neef,'' where nieces and female cousins are called ''nicht.'' | |||
===Matrilineal=== | |||
One cannot always translate kin terms, and if one can, the outcome may remain culture-specific. For example, the Spanish word ''consuegro'' indicates the parent of one's son- or daughter-in-law (that is, two people whose children marry become ''consuegros'' to each other); the English language has no equivalent term. In polygynous African societies which use English and French as official languages, a ''sister-wife'' (in French ''belle-épouse)'' is another wife of one's husband; although these terms have come into common use ("I would leave my husband, but I like my sister-wives"), someone with a European cultural background may not readily understand the implications. The words ''brother, sister, aunt, uncle'' have stronger fictive-kinship nuances in many African cultures than in European ones, as exemplified by the phrase "he is my brother: same mother, same father" for a biological brother. | |||
], with her eldest daughter]] | |||
] is a form of kinship system in which an individual's family membership derives from and is traced through his or her mother's ]. | |||
It may also correlate with a ] in which each person is identified with their matriline—their mother's ]—and which can involve the ] of property and titles. A matriline is a ] from a ] ] to a descendant in which the individuals in all intervening generations are mothers{{spndash}}in other words, a "mother line". | |||
In a matrilineal descent system, an individual is considered to belong to the same ] as her or his mother. This matrilineal descent pattern is in contrast to the more common patrilineal descent pattern. | |||
===Bilateral descent=== | |||
] is a form of kinship system in which an individual's family membership derives from and is traced through both the paternal and maternal sides. The relatives on the mother's side and father's side are equally important for emotional ties or for transfer of property or wealth. It is a family arrangement where descent and inheritance are passed equally through both parents.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shepard |first1=Jon <!-- |author-link=Jon M. Shepard--> |last2=Greene |first2=Robert W. |title=Sociology and You |publisher=Glencoe McGraw-Hill |year=2003 |location=Ohio |page=A-22 |url=http://www.glencoe.com/catalog/index.php/program?c=1675&s=21309&p=4213&parent=4526 |isbn=978-0-07-828576-9 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100308100024/http://www.glencoe.com/catalog/index.php/program?c=1675&s=21309&p=4213&parent=4526 |archive-date=2010-03-08 }}</ref> Families who use this system trace descent through both parents simultaneously and recognize multiple ancestors, but unlike with ] descent it is not used to form descent groups.<ref>{{cite book |last=Stone |first=Linda |author-link=Linda Stone |title=Kinship and Gender: An Introduction |publisher=Westview Press |year=2006 |location=Boulder, Colorado |pages= |isbn=978-0-8133-4302-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/kinshipgenderint0000ston_k8m0/page/168 }}</ref> | |||
Traditionally, this is found among some groups in West Africa, India, Australia, Indonesia, ], Malaysia and ]. Anthropologists believe that a tribal structure based on bilateral descent helps members live in extreme environments because it allows individuals to rely on two sets of families dispersed over a wide area.<ref name="scientificamerican2001">{{cite journal |last=Ezzell |first=Carol |title=The Himba and the Dam |url=http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=0005596A-DE68-1C6F-84A9809EC588EF21 |journal=Scientific American |date=June 2001 |volume=284 |issue=6 |pages=80–90 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0601-80 |pmid=11396346 |bibcode=2001SciAm.284f..80E |access-date=2015-07-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012142329/http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=0005596A-DE68-1C6F-84A9809EC588EF21 |archive-date=2007-10-12 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
==History of theories== | |||
{{Main|History of the family}} | |||
Early scholars of family history applied ]'s biological ] in their theory of evolution of family systems.<ref name="Encyclopædia Britannica">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Sociology/Founding the discipline |encyclopedia=] |access-date=2009-07-26 |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551887/sociology/222961/Founding-the-discipline#ref=ref748622 |archive-date=2009-12-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091223213531/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551887/sociology/222961/Founding-the-discipline#ref=ref748622 |url-status=live }}</ref> American anthropologist ] published '']'' in 1877 based on his theory of the three stages of human progress from ] through ] to ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/morgan-lewis/ancient-society/index.htm | title=Ancient Society by Lewis H. Morgan 1877 }}</ref> Morgan's book was the "inspiration for ]' book" '']'' published in 1884.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |title=Cultural Anthropology |access-date=2009-07-22 |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/146165/cultural-anthropology/38786/Marxism-and-the-collectors#ref=ref423234 |archive-date=2009-08-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090815222603/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/146165/cultural-anthropology/38786/Marxism-and-the-collectors#ref=ref423234 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Engels expanded Morgan's hypothesis that economical factors caused the transformation of primitive community into a class-divided society.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Marxists Internet Archive |access-date=2009-07-17 |url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/index.htm |archive-date=2006-04-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060425070029/http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/index.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Engels' theory of ] control, and later that of ], was used to explain the cause and effect of change in family structure and function. The popularity of this theory was largely unmatched until the 1980s, when other sociological theories, most notably ], gained acceptance. | |||
===The nuclear family in industrial society=== | |||
] | |||
Contemporary society generally views the family as a haven from the world, supplying absolute fulfillment. Zinn and Eitzen discuss the image of the "family as haven ... a place of ], ] and ] where individuals may ] the competition of dehumanizing forces in modern society".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Zinn |first1=Maxine Baca |last2=Eitzen |first2=D. Stanley |title=Diversity in families |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PertAAAAMAAJ |access-date=2012-01-06 |edition=6 |year=2002 |publisher=Allyn and Bacon |isbn=978-0-205-33522-0 |page=557 |quote=This 'family as haven' image of a refuge from an impersonal world characterizes the family as a place of intimacy, love, and trust in which individuals may escape the competition of dehumanizing forces in modern society. Christopher Lasch (1977:8) has named this image a 'haven in a heartless world' and described it as a glorification of private life made necessary by the deprivations experienced in the public world. |archive-date=2013-03-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130329013617/http://books.google.com/books?id=PertAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
During ], "he family as a repository of warmth and tenderness (embodied by the mother) stands in opposition to the competitive and aggressive world of commerce (embodied by the father). The family's task was to protect against the outside world."{{sfnp|Zinn|Eitzen|1987|p=3}} However, Zinn and Eitzen note, "The protective image of the family has waned in recent years as the ideals of family fulfillment have taken shape. Today, the family is more compensatory than protective. It supplies what is vitally needed but missing in other social arrangements."{{sfnp|Zinn|Eitzen|1987|p=3}} | |||
Unhappily married couples are at 3–25 times the risk of developing clinical depression.<ref>{{Cite web |author1=Tatiana D. Gray |author2=Matt Hawrilenko |author3=James V. Cordova |date=2019 |title=Randomized Controlled Trial of the Marriage Checkup: Depression Outcomes |url=https://arammu.com/assets/research/MC%20Depression%20Outcomes.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fink |first1=Brandi C. |last2=Shapiro |first2=Alyson F. |date=March 2013 |title=Coping Mediates the Association Between Marital Instability and Depression, but Not Marital Satisfaction and Depression |journal=Couple & Family Psychology |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=1–13 |doi=10.1037/a0031763 |issn=2160-4096 |pmc=4096140 |pmid=25032063}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |author1=Maria R. Goldfarb |author2=Gilles Trudel |date=2019 |title=Marital quality and depression: a review |journal=Marriage & Family Review |volume=55 |issue=8 |pages=737–763 |doi=10.1080/01494929.2019.1610136 |s2cid=165116052}}</ref> | |||
"The popular wisdom", according to Zinn and Eitzen, sees the family structures of the past as superior to those today, and families as more stable and happier at a time when they did not have to contend with problems such as illegitimate children and ]. They respond to this, saying, "there is no golden age of the family gleaming at us in the far back historical past."{{sfnp|Zinn|Eitzen|1987|p=8}} "Desertion by spouses, illegitimate children, and other conditions that are considered characteristics of modern times existed in the past as well."{{sfnp|Zinn|Eitzen|1987|p=8}} | |||
===The postmodern family=== | |||
] | |||
Others argue that whether or not one views the family as "declining" depends on one's definition of "family". "Married couples have dropped below half of all American households. This drop is shocking from traditional forms of the family system. Only a fifth of households were following traditional ways of having married couples raising a family together."<ref>{{cite news |last=Tavernise |first=Sabrina |date=2011 |title=Married Couples Are No Longer a Majority, Census Finds |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/us/26marry.html?_r=1# |access-date=January 8, 2014 |archive-date=March 25, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140325130308/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/us/26marry.html?_r=1 |url-status=live }}</ref> In the Western World, marriages are no longer ] for economic, social or political gain, and children are no longer expected to contribute to family income. Instead, people choose mates based on ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Family Revolution |url=https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_family_revolution |access-date=2022-05-04 |website=Greater Good |language=en |archive-date=2022-03-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220315184821/https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_family_revolution |url-status=live }}</ref> This increased role of love indicates a societal shift toward favoring emotional fulfilment and relationships within a family, and this shift necessarily weakens the institution of the family.<ref>Coontz, Stephanie. 2005. ''Marriage, A History: How Love Conquered Marriage''. New York: Viking/Penguin Books.</ref> | |||
Margaret Mead considers the family as a main safeguard to continuing human progress. Observing, "Human beings have learned, laboriously, to be human", she adds: "we hold our present form of humanity on trust, it is possible to lose it" ... "It is not without significance that the most successful large-scale abrogations of the family have occurred not among simple savages, living close to the subsistence edge, but among great nations and strong empires, the resources of which were ample, the populations huge, and the power almost unlimited"<ref>''Male and Female'', New York, 1949. pp. 193–194</ref> | |||
Many countries (particularly Western) have, in recent years, changed their ]s in order to accommodate diverse family models. For instance, in the United Kingdom, in Scotland, the ''Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006'' provides cohabitants with some limited rights.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Justice/law/17867/fm-couples-root/fm-couples-cohabitation|title=Family Matters – Couples – Cohabitation|publisher=Scottish Government, Edinburgh|date=27 April 2006|website=Scotland.gov.uk|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=24 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141024082441/http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Justice/law/17867/fm-couples-root/fm-couples-cohabitation|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2010, Ireland enacted the ]. There have also been moves at an international level, most notably, the ] ''European Convention on the Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/085.htm|title=Full list|website=Coe.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=2 October 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001002094646/http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/085.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> which came into force in 1978. Countries which ratify it must ensure that children born outside marriage are provided with legal rights as stipulated in the text of this convention. The convention was ratified by the UK in 1981 and by Ireland in 1988.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=085&CM=&DF=&CL=ENG|title=Full list|website=Coe.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=2 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402091742/http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=085&CM=&DF=&CL=ENG|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In the United States, one in five mothers has children by different fathers; among mothers with two or more children the figure is higher, with 28% having children with at least two different men. Such families are more common among Blacks and Hispanics and among the lower socioeconomic class.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42364656/ns/health-childrens_health/t/us-moms-have-kids-multiple-dads-study-says/#.VaJYA7XD_Ao|title=1 in 5 US moms have kids with multiple dads, study says|date=1 April 2011|website=Nbcnews.com|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=22 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170622083111/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42364656/ns/health-childrens_health/t/us-moms-have-kids-multiple-dads-study-says/#.VaJYA7XD_Ao|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
However, in western society, the single parent family has been growing more accepted and has begun to make an impact on culture. Single parent families are more commonly single mother families than single father.<ref>{{Cite web |title=American Children's Family Structure: Single-Parent Families |url=https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/eickmeyer-single-parent-families-fp-17-17.html |access-date=2022-05-04 |website=Bowling Green State University |language=en |archive-date=2021-06-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210620125849/https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/eickmeyer-single-parent-families-fp-17-17.html |url-status=live }}</ref> These families sometimes face difficult issues besides the fact that they have to rear their children on their own, for example, low income making it difficult to pay for rent, child care, and other necessities for a healthy and safe home. | |||
Furthermore, there are families that consist of ] raising children. This is made possible due to surrogacy, ], ], adoption, and other processes. | |||
==Domestic violence== | |||
{{Main|Domestic violence}} | |||
Domestic violence (DV) is violence that happens within the family. The legal and social understanding of the concept of DV differs by culture. The definition of the term "domestic violence" varies, depending on the context in which it is used.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/defdomvio.cfm |title=Definitions of Domestic Violence – Child Welfare Information Gateway |website=Childwelfare.gov |access-date=23 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141215012201/https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/defdomvio.cfm |archive-date=15 December 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref> It may be defined differently in medical, legal, political or social contexts. The definitions have varied over time, and vary in different parts of the world. | |||
The ] states that:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/210.htm|title=Full list|website=Coe.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=23 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923210455/http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/210.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote|"domestic violence" shall mean all acts of physical, sexual, psychological or economic violence that occur within the family or domestic unit or between former or current spouses or partners, whether or not the perpetrator shares or has shared the same residence with the victim.}} | |||
In 1993, the United Nations ] identified domestic violence as one of three contexts in which ] occurs, describing it as:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r104.htm|title=A/RES/48/104. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women|date=20 December 1993|publisher=]|access-date=28 June 2017|archive-date=16 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190816082450/https://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r104.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote|Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including battering, sexual abuse of female children in the household, ]-related violence, ], ] and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation.}} | |||
===Family violence=== | |||
Family violence is a broader definition, often used to include ], ], and other violent acts between family members.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wallace |first=Harvey |year=2004 |title=Family Violence: Legal, Medical, and Social Perspectives |publisher=Allyn & Bacon |isbn=0-205-41822-8 |page=2}}</ref> | |||
Child abuse is defined by the ] as:<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.who.int/topics/child_abuse/en/ |title=Child maltreatment |publisher=World Health Organization |access-date=23 October 2017 |archive-date=17 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171017235616/http://www.who.int/topics/child_abuse/en/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote|Child maltreatment, sometimes referred to as child abuse and neglect, includes all forms of physical and emotional ill-treatment, sexual abuse, neglect, and exploitation that results in actual or potential harm to the child's health, development or dignity. Within this broad definition, five subtypes can be distinguished – physical abuse; sexual abuse; neglect and negligent treatment; emotional abuse; and exploitation.}} | |||
There exists legislation to prevent and punish the occurrence of these offences. There are laws regarding familial sexual activity, which states that it is a criminal offence to have any kind of sexual relationship between one's grandparent, parent, sibling, aunt or uncle.<ref>{{cite book|doi=10.1057/9781137476159_5|chapter = When Yes Actually Means Yes|year = 2015|last1 = Roffee|first1 = James A.|title=Rape Justice | pages=72–91 |isbn=978-1-137-47615-9 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1093/hrlr/ngu023|url=http://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/33349.pdf|title=No Consensus on Incest? Criminalisation and Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights|volume=14|issue=3|year=2014|journal=Human Rights Law Review|pages=541–572|last1=Roffee|first1=J. A.|access-date=2018-10-30|archive-date=2018-10-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181030170425/http://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/33349.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Elder abuse is, according to the WHO: "a single, or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust which causes harm or distress to an older person".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/ageing/projects/elder_abuse/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071026062106/http://www.who.int/ageing/projects/elder_abuse/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 26, 2007|title=Elder abuse|publisher=]|access-date=23 October 2017}}</ref> | |||
====Parental abuse of children (child abuse)==== | |||
{{See also|Adverse childhood experiences|Child abuse}} | |||
Child abuse is the physical, sexual or emotional maltreatment or neglect of a child or children.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Child+abuse|title=Child abuse – definition of child abuse by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia|website=Thefreedictionary.com|access-date=15 September 2010|archive-date=9 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190609124754/http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Child+Abuse|url-status=live}}</ref> In the United States, the ] (CDC) and the Department for Children and Families (DCF) define child maltreatment as any act or series of acts of commission or omission by a parent or other caregiver that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child.<ref name=CDC>{{cite web |last1=Leeb |first1=R.T. |first2=L.J. |last2=Paulozzi |first3=C. |last3=Melanson |first4=T.R. |last4=Simon |last5=Arias |first5=I. |url=https://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/CMP/CMP-Surveillance.htm |access-date=20 October 2008 |publisher=] |title=Child Maltreatment Surveillance: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements |date=1 January 2008 |archive-date=16 October 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081016225901/http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/CMP/CMP-Surveillance.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Child abuse can occur in a child's home, or in the organizations, schools or communities the child interacts with. There are four major categories of child abuse: ], ], ], and ]. | |||
====Parental abuse by children==== | |||
{{Main|Parental abuse by children}} | |||
] of parents by their children is a common but under reported and under-researched subject. A factor why this subject is under-researched is because of the overshadowing effect caused by parents abusing their children instead. Parents are quite often subject to levels of ] in excess of normal childhood aggressive outbursts, typically in the form of ] or ] abuse. Parents feel a sense of ] and ] to have that problem, so they rarely seek help and it is usually little or no help available anyway.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://parentlineplus.org.uk/default.aspx?page=viewarticle&module=articles-view&id=686&tags=25|title=Parenting and Family Support – Family Lives (Parentline Plus)|website=Parentlineplus.org.uk|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=21 December 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101221082325/http://parentlineplus.org.uk/default.aspx?page=viewarticle&module=articles-view&id=686&tags=25|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://familylives.org.uk/sites/default/files/When%20family%20hurts%202010.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120619160335/http://familylives.org.uk/sites/default/files/When%20family%20hurts%202010.pdf|url-status=dead|title=WHEN FAMILY LIFE HURTS: Family experience of aggression in children – Parentline plus 31 October 2010|archive-date=June 19, 2012}}</ref> | |||
====Elder abuse==== | |||
{{Main|Elder abuse}} | |||
Elder abuse is "a single, or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust, which causes harm or distress to an older person".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820165643/https://www.elderabuse.org.uk/ |date=2019-08-20 }}, accessed October 12, 2007.</ref> This definition has been adopted by the ] from a definition put forward by Action on Elder Abuse in the UK. Laws protecting the elderly from abuse are similar to, and related to, laws protecting ]s from abuse. | |||
The core element to the harm of elder abuse is the "expectation of trust" of the older person toward their abuser. Thus, it includes harms by people the older person knows or with whom they have a relationship, such as a spouse, partner or family member, a friend or neighbor, or people that the older person relies on for services. Many forms of elder abuse are recognized as types of domestic violence or family violence. | |||
===Forced and child marriage=== | |||
{{Main|Forced marriage|Child marriage}} | |||
Forced and child marriages are practiced in certain regions of the world, particularly in Asia and Africa, and these types of marriages are associated with a high rate of domestic violence.<ref name="hrw.org"/><ref name="who.int"/><ref name="bbc.co.uk"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://plan-uk.org/about/our-work/child-marriage|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140312222100/http://www.plan-uk.org/early-and-forced-marriage/|url-status=dead|title=Early and forced marriage – facts, figures and what you can do|archive-date=March 12, 2014 |website=Plan International UK}}</ref> | |||
A ] is a marriage where one or both participants are married without their freely given consent.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/forcedmarriage/introduction_1.shtml|title=Ethics – Forced Marriages: Introduction|website=Bbc.co.uk|access-date=12 April 2017 |archive-date=3 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150903060233/http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/forcedmarriage/introduction_1.shtml |url-status=live}}</ref> The line between forced marriage and consensual marriage may become blurred, because the social norms of many cultures dictate that one should never oppose the desire of one's parents/relatives in regard to the choice of a spouse; in such cultures it is not necessary for violence, threats, intimidation etc. to occur, the person simply "consents" to the marriage even if they do not want it, out of the implied social pressure and duty. The customs of ] and ], that exist in parts of the world, can lead to buying and selling people into marriage.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/slavery/modern/modern_1.shtml#section_2|title=Ethics – Slavery: Modern slavery|website=Bbc.co.uk|access-date=12 April 2017 |archive-date=6 January 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140106012011/http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/slavery/modern/modern_1.shtml#section_2 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-41_en.pdf|title=Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences|author=Gulnara Shahinian|website=Ohchr.org|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060954/http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-41_en.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
A child marriage is a ] where one or both spouses are under 18.<ref name="unicef.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.unicef.org/protection/57929_58008.html|title=Child marriage|website=UNICEF|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=7 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180907061839/https://www.unicef.org/protection/57929_58008.html|url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="hrw.org">{{cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/06/14/q-child-marriage-and-violations-girls-rights|title=Q & A: Child Marriage and Violations of Girls' Rights|date=14 June 2013|website=Human Rights Watch|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=20 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130620105605/https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/06/14/q-child-marriage-and-violations-girls-rights|url-status=live}}</ref> Child marriage was common throughout history but is today condemned by international human rights organizations.<ref name="bbc.co.uk">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art16.shtml|work=I have a right to|publisher= BBC World Service |title=Article 16: Right to marriage and family and to equal rights of men and women during and after marriage |access-date=7 October 2014|archive-date=6 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170406125350/http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art16.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Factsheet: Child Marriage |url=http://www.girlup.org/assets/pdfs/factsheet1-about-child-marriage.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130909152040/http://www.girlup.org/assets/pdfs/factsheet1-about-child-marriage.pdf |archive-date=2013-09-09 |access-date=2014-07-20 |website=GirlUp |publisher=United Nations Foundation}}</ref><ref name="who.int">{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/child_marriage_20130307/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130314073138/http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/child_marriage_20130307/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 14, 2013|title=Child marriages: 39,000 every day|website=WHO |date=7 March 2013 |access-date=7 October 2014}}</ref> Child marriages are often arranged between the families of the future bride and groom, sometimes as soon as the girl is born.<ref name="bbc.co.uk"/> Child marriages can also occur in the context of ].<ref name="bbc.co.uk"/> | |||
==The concept of family honour== | |||
{{Main|Family honor}} | |||
{{Further|Culture of honor|Honor killing}} | |||
Family honor is an abstract concept involving the perceived quality of worthiness and respectability that affects the social standing and the self-evaluation of a group of related people, both corporately and individually.<ref name="Malina2001">{{cite book |last=Malina |first=Bruce J. |title=The New Testament world: insights from cultural anthropology |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ek3fSY7jRDcC&pg=PA42 |access-date=7 November 2011 |date= 2001 |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |isbn=978-0-664-22295-6 |page=42 |archive-date=25 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225103408/https://books.google.com/books?id=Ek3fSY7jRDcC&pg=PA42 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="spain">{{cite journal |last2=Manstead |first2=Antony S.R. |last3=Fischer |first3=Agneta H. |last1=Mosquera |first1=Patricia M.R. |title=Honor in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe |journal=Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |date=January 2002 |volume=33 |issue=1 |pages=16–36 |url=http://jcc.sagepub.com/content/33/1/16.short |access-date=17 October 2011 |doi=10.1177/0022022102033001002 |citeseerx=10.1.1.1006.591 |s2cid=55174724 |archive-date=25 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225103411/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022022102033001002 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The family is viewed as the main source of ] and the community highly values the relationship between honor and the family.<ref name="Family">{{cite book |last=Berns |first=Roberta |title=Child, family, school, community: socialization and support |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AD3e7Xdn2NMC&q=family+honor+in+different+cultures&pg=PA528 |year=2007 |publisher=Thompson Learning |page=139 |isbn=978-0-495-00758-6 |access-date=2020-10-31 |archive-date=2021-04-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415005944/https://books.google.com/books?id=AD3e7Xdn2NMC&q=family+honor+in+different+cultures&pg=PA528 |url-status=live }}</ref> The conduct of family members reflects upon family honor and the way the family perceives itself, and is perceived by others.<ref name="spain"/> In ] maintaining the family honor is often perceived as more important than either ], or individual achievement.<ref name="McGoldrickGiordano2005">{{cite book |last1=McGoldrick |first1=Monica |last2=Giordano |first2=Joseph |last3=Garcia-Preto |first3=Nydia |title=Ethnicity and family therapy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6Al1kB_6GyMC |access-date=24 October 2011 |date= 2005 |publisher=Guilford Press |page=445 |isbn=978-1-59385-020-3 |archive-date=16 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316101153/http://books.google.com/books?id=6Al1kB_6GyMC |url-status=live }}</ref> In extreme cases, engaging in acts that are deemed to tarnish the honor of the family results in ]s. An honor killing is the ] of a member of a family or social group by other members, due to the perpetrators' belief that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the family or community, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an ], being in a relationship that is disapproved by their relatives, having ], becoming the victim of ], dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate, or engaging in ] relations.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/honourcrimes/ |title=Ethics: Honour Crimes |publisher=BBC |date=1 January 1970 |access-date=23 December 2013 |archive-date=19 June 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140619163216/http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/honourcrimes/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/honor%20killing |title=Honor killing: Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary |website=Merriam-webster.com |date=31 August 2012 |access-date=23 December 2013 |archive-date=22 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131222161404/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/honor%20killing |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/honor+killing?s=t |title=Honor killing definition |website=Dictionary.reference.com |access-date=23 December 2013 |archive-date=2 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202231426/http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/honor+killing?s=t |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/13/world/europe/turkey-gay-killing |title=Shocking gay honor killing inspires movie |website=Edition.cnn.com |access-date=16 August 2013 |archive-date=29 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929031542/http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/13/world/europe/turkey-gay-killing |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/02/23/arizona.iraqi.father/index.html |title=Iraqi immigrant convicted in Arizona 'honor killing' awaits sentence |website=Edition.cnn.com |access-date=16 August 2013 |date=23 February 2011 |archive-date=29 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929031535/http://edition.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/02/23/arizona.iraqi.father/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==Economic issues== | |||
A family is often part of a ] with ]. | |||
===Dowry, bride price and dower=== | |||
{{Further|Dowry|Bride price|Dower}} | |||
] | |||
Dowry is property (money, goods, or estate) that a wife or wife's family gives to her husband when the wife and husband marry.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dowry|title=Definition of DOWRY|website=Merriam-webster.com|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=22 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222025031/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dowry|url-status=live}}</ref> Offering dowry was common in many cultures historically (including in Europe and North America), but this practice today is mostly restricted to some areas primarily in the ]. | |||
Bride price, (also bride wealth or bride token), is property paid by the groom or his family to the parents of a woman upon the marriage of their daughter to the groom. It is practiced mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of South-East Asia (], ]), and parts of Central Asia. | |||
Dower is property given to the bride herself by the groom at the time of marriage, and which remains under her ownership and control.<ref>{{cite book |last=Goody |first=Jack |title=Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain |year=1976 |publisher=] |location=Cambridge |page=8}}</ref> | |||
===Property regimes and taxation=== | |||
In some countries married couples benefit from various taxation advantages not available to a single person or to unmarried couples. For example, spouses may be allowed to average their combined incomes. Some jurisdictions recognize ] or '']'' relations for this purposes. In some jurisdictions there is also an option of ] or ]. | |||
Different property regimes exist for spouses. In many countries, each marriage partner has the choice of keeping their property ] or combining properties. In the latter case, called ], when the marriage ends by divorce each owns half. In lieu of a ] or ], property owned by the deceased generally is inherited by the surviving spouse. | |||
==Rights and laws== | |||
===Family rights=== | |||
The ] is enshrined in the ] of 1948 by the ]: | |||
{{Blockquote | |||
|text=The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. | |||
|multiline=yes | |||
|source= | |||
}} | |||
]'s view of families as ]s<ref name="o509">{{cite book | last=Hegel | first=Georg Wilhelm Fredrich | title=Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of Right: | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=25 October 1991 | isbn=978-0-521-34438-8 | doi=10.1017/cbo9780511808012 | page=}}</ref> is reflected in the legal system of some countries.<ref name="p817">{{cite journal | last=Carney | first=Michael | last2=Gedajlovic | first2=Eric | last3=Strike | first3=Vanessa M. | title=Dead Money: Inheritance Law and the Longevity of Family Firms | journal=Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice | volume=38 | issue=6 | date=2014 | issn=1042-2587 | doi=10.1111/etap.12123 | pages=1261–1283}}</ref> | |||
===Reproductive rights=== | |||
{{Main|Reproductive rights}} | |||
{{Further|Forced sterilization|Forced pregnancy|Forced abortion}} | |||
]]] | |||
Reproductive rights are legal rights and freedoms relating to reproduction and ]. These include the right to decide on issues regarding the number of children born, family planning, contraception, and private life, free from ] and ]; as well as the right to access health services and adequate information.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/hhr/activities/GRR/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030829044430/http://www.who.int/hhr/activities/GRR/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 29, 2003|title=Gender, equity, human rights|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/english/ch3/ch3_box9.htm|title=State of World Population 2005|website=UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=1 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140301232916/http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/english/ch3/ch3_box9.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/gender_rights/sexual_health/en/|title=WHO – Gender and human rights|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=23 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181223213827/https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/gender_rights/sexual_health/en/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/campaigns/stop-violence-against-women/issues/implementation-existing-laws/srr|title=Get Involved|website=Amnesty.org|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=17 January 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150117014102/http://www.amnesty.org/en/campaigns/stop-violence-against-women/issues/implementation-existing-laws/srr|url-status=live}}</ref> According to ], reproductive rights "include the right to decide the number, timing and spacing of children, the right to voluntarily marry and establish a family, and the right to the highest attainable standard of health, among others".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unfpa.org/rights/rights.htm|title=Supporting the Constellation of Reproductive Rights|website=UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=30 July 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130730095817/http://www.unfpa.org/rights/rights.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> ] refers to the factors that may be considered by individuals and couples in order for them to control their fertility, anticipate and attain the desired number of children and the spacing and timing of their births.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en/|title=Family planning|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=18 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160318195523/http://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unfpa.org/family-planning|title=Family planning|website=UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=30 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330132526/https://www.unfpa.org/family-planning|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The state and church have been, and still are in some countries, involved in controlling the size of families, often using coercive methods, such as bans on contraception or abortion (where the policy is a ] one—for example through ]) or conversely, discriminatory policies against large families (e.g., China's ] in place from 1978 to 2015) or even ]s. ] has often targeted ethnic minority groups, such as Roma women in Eastern Europe,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stopvaw.org/forced_coerced_sterilization|title=Forced/Coerced Sterilization|website=Stopvaw.org|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=13 December 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141213022059/http://www.stopvaw.org/forced_coerced_sterilization|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8375960.stm|title=Czech regret over sterilisation|website=BBC News|access-date=12 April 2017|date=2009-11-24|archive-date=2018-10-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181013150955/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8375960.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> or indigenous women in Peru (during the 1990s).<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-15891372|title=Peru women fight for justice over forced sterilisation|first=Mattia|last=Cabitza|date=6 December 2011|access-date=12 April 2017|work=]|archive-date=8 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708075032/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-15891372|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Parents' rights=== | |||
The ] movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues affecting parents and children related to family law, specifically parental rights and obligations. ] movements focus on ], workplace issues such as ], ], and rights in ]. The ] movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to ], including ] and ], that affect fathers and their ]ren.{{sfnp|Collier|Sheldon|2006|pp=1–26}} | |||
===Children's rights=== | |||
{{Main|Children's rights}} | |||
Children's rights are the human rights of children, with particular attention to the rights of special protection and care afforded to minors, including their right to association with both parents, their right to human identity, their right to be provided in regard to their other basic needs, and their right to be free from violence and abuse.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_protecting.html|title=Protecting children's rights |website=UNICEF|access-date=23 October 2017 |archive-date=6 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306162541/https://www.unicef.org/crc/index_protecting.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/topic/childrens-rights|title=Children's Rights|website=Hrw.org|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=6 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170406151206/https://www.hrw.org/topic/childrens-rights|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/children|title=Children and human rights|publisher=Amnesty International|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=19 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150219233024/http://www.amnesty.org/en/children|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Marriage rights=== | |||
{{Main|Marriage law}} | |||
Each jurisdiction has its own ]s. These laws differ significantly from country to country; and these laws are often controversial. Areas of controversy include ] as well as ]. | |||
===Legal reforms=== | |||
====Gender equality==== | |||
Legal reforms to ]s have taken place in many countries during the past few decades. These dealt primarily with ] within marriage and with ]s. Women have been given equal rights in marriage in many countries, reversing older family laws based on the dominant legal role of the husband. ], which was enshrined in the ] of England and the US for several centuries and throughout most of the 19th century, was abolished. In some European countries the changes that lead to gender equality were slower. The period of 1975–1979 saw a major overhaul of ]s in countries such as Italy,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/493052/IPOL-FEMM_NT%282014%29493052_EN.pdf|title=The Policy on Gender Equality in Italy|website=Europarl.europa.eu|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924004439/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/493052/IPOL-FEMM_NT%282014%29493052_EN.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session20/A-HRC-20-16-Add2_en.pdf|title=Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences|author=Rashida Manjoo|website=Ohchr.org|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304042843/http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session20/A-HRC-20-16-Add2_en.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Spain,<ref>{{cite book | chapter-url = http://countrystudies.us/spain/43.htm | chapter = Social Values and Attitudes | editor-first = Eric | editor-last = Solsten | editor2-first = Sandra W. | editor2-last = Meditz | title = Spain: A Country Study | location = Washington | publisher = Government Printing Office for the Library of Congress | year = 1988 | access-date = 2016-02-26 | archive-date = 2011-05-20 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110520160528/http://countrystudies.us/spain/43.htm | url-status = live }}</ref> Austria,<ref name="Contemporary Western European Feminism pp. 133">''Contemporary Western European Feminism'', by ], p. 133</ref> West Germany,<ref>Reconciliation Policy in Germany 1998–2008, Construing the 'Problem' of the Incompatibility of Paid Employment and Care Work, by Cornelius Grebe; p. 92: ''"However, the 1977 reform of marriage and family law by Social Democrats and Liberals formally gave women the right to take up employment without their spouses' permission. This marked the legal end of the 'housewife marriage' and a transition to the ideal of 'marriage in partnership'."'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170416053908/http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-531-91924-9|date=2017-04-16}}</ref><ref>Further reforms to parental rights law in 1979 gave equal legal rights to the mother and the father. ''Comparative Law: Historical Development of the Civil Law Tradition in Europe'', Latin America, and East Asia, by John Henry Merryman, David Scott Clark, John Owen Haley, p. 542</ref> and Portugal.<ref>''Women in Portugal'', by Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General Information, p. 32</ref> In 1978, the ] passed the ''Resolution (78) 37 on equality of spouses in civil law''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=596422&SecMode=1&DocId=662346&Usage=2 |format=PDF|title=On Equality of Spouses in Civil Law|website=Wcd.coe.int|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=21 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160121025014/https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=596422&SecMode=1&DocId=662346&Usage=2|url-status=live}}</ref> Among the last European countries to establish full ] in marriage were Switzerland. In 1985, a referendum guaranteed women legal equality with men within marriage.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-17988450 |title=Switzerland profile|date=24 July 2017|access-date=23 October 2017|website=Bbc.com|archive-date=17 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180617053429/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-17988450|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://history-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch/chronology-womens-right-vote-switzerland.html|title=The Long Way to Women's Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology|website=History-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch |access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=21 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191121120734/http://history-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch/chronology-womens-right-vote-switzerland.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The new reforms came into force in January 1988.<ref>''Women's movements of the world: an international directory and reference guide'', edited by Sally Shreir, p. 254</ref> In Greece, in 1983, legislation was passed guaranteeing equality between spouses, abolishing ], and ending legal discrimination against illegitimate children.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/26/world/around-the-world-greece-approves-family-law-changes.html |title=AROUND THE WORLD; Greece Approves Family Law Changes|date=23 October 1983|access-date=23 October 2017|newspaper=The New York Times |archive-date=16 June 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120616093929/http://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/26/world/around-the-world-greece-approves-family-law-changes.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>Demos, Vasilikie. (2007) "The Intersection of Gender, Class and Nationality and the Agency of Kytherian Greek Women." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. August 11</ref> In 1981, Spain abolished the requirement that married women must have their husbands' permission to initiate judicial proceedings<ref name="wbl.worldbank.org">{{Cite web |date=2013 |vauthors=((International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank))|title=Women, Business and the Law 2014: Removing Restrictions to Enhance Gender Equality |url=http://wbl.worldbank.org/~/media/FPDKM/WBL/Documents/Reports/2014/Women-Business-and-the-Law-2014-Key-Findings.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140824032832/http://wbl.worldbank.org/~/media/FPDKM/WBL/Documents/Reports/2014/Women-Business-and-the-Law-2014-Key-Findings.pdf |archive-date=2014-08-24 |access-date=2014-08-25 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing Plc |location=London}}</ref> the Netherlands,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168045ae0e |format=PDF|title=Dutch gender and LGBT-equality policy : 2013 – 2016|website=Rm.coe.int|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=12 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612141037/https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168045ae0e|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/Gender/publication/Netherlands_2015_Review_BPFA_Report_of_the_Netherlands_Government.pdf|title=2015 Review Report of the Netherlands Government in the context of the twentieth anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women and the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action|website=Unece.org|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-date=5 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151005144755/http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/Gender/publication/Netherlands_2015_Review_BPFA_Report_of_the_Netherlands_Government.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> and France{{refn|group=note|Although married women in France obtained the right to work without their husbands' permission in 1965,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Virtual Special Issue: Modern & Contemporary France: Women in France |url=http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/cmcf-vsi-women-in-france.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304092212/http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/cmcf-vsi-women-in-france.pdf |archive-date=2016-03-04 |access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref> and the paternal authority of a man over his family was ended in 1970 (before that parental responsibilities belonged solely to the father who made all legal decisions concerning the children), it was only in 1985 that a legal reform abolished the stipulation that the husband had the sole power to administer the children's property.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ferrand |first=Frédérique |title=National Report: France |url=http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/France-Parental-Responsibilities.pdf |website=Commission on European Family Law |access-date=2016-02-26 |archive-date=2014-08-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140811145534/http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/France-Parental-Responsibilities.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>}} in the 1980s. In recent decades, the ] has also been abolished in African countries that had this doctrine, but many African countries that were former ] still have discriminatory laws in their marriages regulations, such regulations originating in the ] that has inspired these laws.<ref name="wbl.worldbank.org" /> | |||
====Divorce==== | |||
In some countries (predominantly Roman Catholic) divorce was legalized only recently (e.g. ] (1970), ] (1975), ] (1977), ] (1981), ] (1987), ] (1996), ] (2004) and ] (2011)) although ] and ] were options. The ] still does not allow divorce. (see ]). The laws pertaining to the situation of children born outside marriage have also been revised in many countries (see ]). | |||
==Health== | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150418113820/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2223rank.html |date=2015-04-18 }} in ].</ref>]] | |||
===Family medicine=== | |||
{{Main|Family medicine}} | |||
Family medicine is a medical specialty devoted to comprehensive health care for people of all ages; it is based on knowledge of the patient in the context of the family and the community, emphasizing disease prevention and health promotion.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://familymedicine.bsd.uchicago.edu/OurDepartment/WhatIsFamilyMedicine|title=What is Family Medicine?|website=Uchicago.edu – Department of Family Medicine|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=7 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170507232549/http://familymedicine.bsd.uchicago.edu/OurDepartment/WhatIsFamilyMedicine|url-status=live}}</ref> The importance of family medicine is being increasingly recognized.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2013/family_medicine_20130626/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307030845/http://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2013/family_medicine_20130626/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 7, 2014|title=The rising importance of family medicine|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017}}</ref> | |||
{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714153724/http://www.childmortality.org/files_v16/download/UNICEF%202013%20IGME%20child%20mortality%20Report_Final.pdf |date=July 14, 2014 }}, ], 2013.</ref>]] | |||
===Maternal mortality=== | |||
{{Main|Maternal mortality}} | |||
Maternal mortality or maternal death is defined by ] as "the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes."<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web |url=https://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/indmaternalmortality/en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130507115424/http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/indmaternalmortality/en/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 7, 2013 |title= Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)|website= Who.int |access-date=12 April 2017}}</ref> Historically, maternal mortality was a major cause of women's death. In recent decades, advances in healthcare have resulted in rates of maternal mortality having dropped dramatically, especially in Western countries. Maternal mortality however remains a serious problem in many African and Asian counties.<ref name="autogenerated1"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/|title=Maternal mortality|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=30 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150930184330/http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Infant and child mortality=== | |||
{{Main|Infant mortality|Child mortality}} | |||
Infant mortality is the death of a child less than one year of age. Child mortality is the death of a child before the child's fifth birthday. Like maternal mortality, infant and child mortality were common throughout history, but have decreased significantly in modern times.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/neonatal_infant_text/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140324141053/http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/neonatal_infant_text/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 24, 2014|title= Infant mortality|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs178/en/|title=Children: reducing mortality|website=Who.int|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=18 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170418155122/http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs178/en/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==Politics== | |||
]]] | |||
], in ]]] | |||
While in many parts of the world family policies seek to promote a gender-equal organization of the family life, in others the male-dominated family continues to be the official policy of the authorities, which is also supported by law. For instance, the Civil Code of ] states at Article 1105: "In relations between husband and wife; the position of the head of the family is the exclusive right of the husband".<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 March 2017 |title=The Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran |url=http://www.alaviandassociates.com/documents/civilcode.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170311161504/http://www.alaviandassociates.com/documents/civilcode.pdf |archive-date=11 March 2017 |access-date=23 October 2017}}</ref> | |||
In some parts of the world, some governments promote a specific form of family, such as that based on traditional ]. The term "family values" is often used in political discourse in some countries, its general meaning being that of traditional or cultural values that pertain to the family's structure, function, roles, beliefs, attitudes, and ideals, usually involving the "traditional family"—a ] family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family".<ref>{{cite journal |last=N |first=Panasenko |title=Czech and Slovak Family Patterns and Family Values in Historical, Social and Cultural Context |journal=Journal of Comparative Family Studies |date=2013 |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=79–98 |doi=10.3138/jcfs.44.1.79 }}</ref> These family ideals are often advanced through policies such as ]. Some jurisdictions outlaw practices which they deem as socially or religiously unacceptable, such as ], ] or ]. | |||
== Work–family balance == | |||
{{Further|Work–family balance in the United States}} | |||
Work–family balance is a concept involving proper prioritizing between work/career and family life. It includes issues relating to the way how work and families intersect and influence each other. At a political level, it is reflected through policies such ] and ]. Since the 1950s, social scientists as well as feminists have increasingly criticized gendered arrangements of work and care, and the male breadwinner role, and policies are increasingly targeting men as fathers, as a tool of changing gender relations.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bjørnholt |first1=M. |author-link1=Margunn Bjørnholt |year=2014 |title=Changing men, changing times; fathers and sons from an experimental gender equality study |url=http://www.margunnbjornholt.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Changing-men-changing-times-fathers-and-sons-from-an-experimental-gender-equality-study.pdf |journal=] |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=295–315 |doi=10.1111/1467-954X.12156 |s2cid=143048732 |access-date=2014-09-11 |archive-date=2018-10-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021020857/http://www.margunnbjornholt.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Changing-men-changing-times-fathers-and-sons-from-an-experimental-gender-equality-study.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Protection of private and family life=== | |||
Article 8 of the ] provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his ]", subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "]".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Art. 8 ECHR Right to private life – Introduction |url=http://echr-online.com/art-8-echr/introduction |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021162524/http://echr-online.com/art-8-echr/introduction |archive-date=2014-10-21 |access-date=2014-10-20 |website=ECHR online}}</ref> | |||
{{cquote|'''Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life''' | |||
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. | |||
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedom of others.}} | |||
==Criticism== | |||
The Russian-American ] and ] philosopher, novelist and playwright ] compared partiality towards ] with ], as a small-scale manifestation of the latter.<ref name="rand">{{Cite book |title=Ayn Rand and the World She Made |last=Heller |first=Anne C. |pages= |location=New York |publisher=Doubleday |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-385-51399-9 |oclc=2290274371 |title-link=Ayn Rand and the World She Made }} Said in {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150703203614/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4JWE7mp8nI |date=2015-07-03 }} Ayn Rand delivered.</ref> "The worship of the family is merely racism, like a crudely primitive first installment on the worship of the tribe. It places the accident of birth above a man's values and duty to the tribe above a man's right to his own life."<ref>Said in {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150703203614/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4JWE7mp8nI |date=2015-07-03 }} Ayn Rand delivered</ref> Additionally, she spoke in favor of ] lifestyle, while following it herself.<ref name="rand"/> | |||
==The family and social justice== | |||
One of the controversies regarding the family is the application of the concept of ] to the private sphere of family relations, in particular with regard to the ] and ]. Throughout much of the history, most philosophers who advocated for social justice focused on the public political arena, not on the family structures; with the family often being seen as a separate entity which needed to be protected from outside state intrusion. One notable exception was ], who, in his work '']'', advocated for greater rights for women within marriage and family.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/feminism-family/|title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |first=Debra |last=Satz|editor-first=Edward N.|editor-last=Zalta|date=1 January 2017|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=12 April 2017|via=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|archive-date=18 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190318120921/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/feminism-family/|url-status=live}}</ref> Second wave feminists argued that ], stating that there are strong connections between personal experiences and the larger social and political structures. In the context of the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s, this was a challenge to the ] and ], as they were understood then.<ref name="Harutyunyan2009p50">Angela Harutyunyan, Kathrin Hörschelmann, Malcolm Miles (2009) ''Public Spheres After Socialism'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220313153054/https://books.google.com/books?id=4tSjNwjax4YC&pg=PA50 |date=2022-03-13 }}</ref> Feminists focused on ], arguing that the reluctance—in law or in practice—of the state to intervene and offer protection to women who have been abused within the family, is in violation of women's ], and is the result of an ideology which places family relations outside the conceptual framework of human rights.<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.academia.edu/568117|title=Domestic Violence: A Violation of Human Rights of Women by Dr. Vibhuti Patel, Director, P.G.S.R.|first=Vibhuti|last=Patel|website=Academia.edu|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=17 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220417101231/https://www.academia.edu/568117|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==Global trends in family composition== | |||
Statistics from an infographic by Olivier Ballou showed that,<ref name="AEI_2015_Eberstadt">{{citation |url=https://www.aei.org/multimedia/global-flight-family/ |title=The global flight from the family |author=Nicholas Eberstadt |date=February 23, 2015 |access-date=February 26, 2017 |publisher=] |location=Washington |quote=keywords Economic Development, Foreign and Defense Policy, International Economics, Infographic by Olivier Ballou global trends in family composition |archive-date=September 8, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908054850/http://www.aei.org/multimedia/global-flight-family/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{{blockquote|In 2013, just over 40% of US babies were born outside marriage. The Census bureau estimated that 27% of all children lived in a fatherless home. Europe has seen a surge in child-free adults. One in five 40-something women are childless in Sweden and in Switzerland, in Italy one in four, in Berlin one in three. So-called traditional societies are seeing the same trend. About one-sixth of Japanese women in their forties have never married and about 30% of all women that age are childless.|}} | |||
However, Swedish statisticians reported in 2013 that, in contrast to many countries, since the 2000s, fewer children have experienced their parents' separation, childlessness had decreased in Sweden and marriages had increased. It had also become more common for couples to have a third child suggesting that the nuclear family was no longer in decline in Sweden.<ref name="unece_2013">{{cite report |url=https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.11/2013/WP_8.2.pdf |series=Joint Eurostat/UNECE Work Session on Demographic Projections |date=October 2013 |location=Rome, Italy |title=Assumptions on future fertility: New family values and increased childbearing in Sweden? |publisher=] |last1=Tollebrant |first1=Johan |last2=Persson |first2=Lotta |access-date=February 26, 2017 |archive-date=February 28, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170228004709/https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.11/2013/WP_8.2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>{{rp|10}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* |
* ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* |
* ] | ||
* |
* ] | ||
*] | |||
==Notes== | |||
*Family | |||
{{reflist|group=note}} | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
*] | |||
**] | |||
*] | |||
*] and ] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
**] | |||
*] | |||
*'']'' | |||
*] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
===Citations=== | |||
* ''American Kinship'', ] | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
* ''A Natural History of Families'', Scott Forbes, Princeton University Press, 2005, ISBN 0691094829 | |||
* ''More Than Kin and Less Than Kind'', Douglas W. Mock, Belknap Press, 2004, ISBN 0674012852 | |||
===Sources=== | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* Race, Class, & Gender: An Anthology, 9th edition. Editors: Margaret L. Anderson and Patricia Hill Collins. Cengage Learning. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Collier |editor1-first=Richard |editor2-last=Sheldon |editor2-first=Sally |title=Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective |year=2006 |publisher=Hart Publishing |isbn=978-1-84113-629-5}} | |||
* {{cite book|author1=Monica McGoldrick|author2=Nydia A. Garcia Preto|author3=Betty A. Carter|title=The Expanding Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bxfZoQEACAAJ|date= 2015|publisher=Pearson Education|isbn=978-0-205-96806-0|access-date=15 February 2017|archive-date=17 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104024/https://books.google.com/books?id=bxfZoQEACAAJ|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal | last1 = Daly | first1 = Mary | author-link = Mary Daly (sociologist) | year = 2011 | title = What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective | journal = Social Politics | volume = 18 | issue = 1| pages = 1–23 | doi=10.1093/sp/jxr002| pmid = 21692242 | s2cid = 21306624 }} | |||
* {{cite journal | last1 = Daly | first1 = Mary | last2 = Lewis | first2 = Jane | year = 2000 | title = The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states | url = http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/alh20157183101 | journal = British Journal of Sociology | volume = 51 | issue = 2 | pages = 281–98 | doi = 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x | pmid = 10905001 | access-date = 2019-06-25 | archive-date = 2019-06-29 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190629101827/http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/alh20157183101 | url-status = live }} | |||
* Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women's new roles. Cambridge: ''Polity Press''. | |||
* {{cite journal | last1 = Ferragina | first1 = Emanuele | last2 = Seeleib-Kaiser | first2 = Martin | year = 2015 | title = Determinants of a Silent (R)evolution:Understanding the Expansion of Family Policy in Rich OECD Countries | journal = Social Politics | volume = 22 | issue = 1| pages = 1–37 | doi=10.1093/sp/jxu027| doi-access = free }} | |||
* Forbes, Scott, ''A Natural History of Families'', (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), {{ISBN|0-691-09482-9}} | |||
* Foucault, Michel (1978). ''The History of Sexuality: Volume I: An Introduction''. (New York: Vintage Books). {{ISBN|978-0-679-72469-8}} | |||
* ] "Identity Belonging and the Critique of Pure Sameness" in Gilroy, Paul (2000) ''Against Race: Imagining Political Culture Beyond the Color Line'', (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press), Ch. I.3, pp. 97–133 | |||
* ] '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160519021048/https://books.google.com/books?id=LVkYFGqylfQC |date=2016-05-19 }}'' (Cambridge University Press, 1980); translated into Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese. | |||
* Mock, Douglas W., ''More Than Kin and Less Than Kind'', (Belknap Press, 2004), {{ISBN|0-674-01285-2}} | |||
* ], ''American Kinship: a cultural approach'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). | |||
* {{cite journal |first1=I. |last1=Tabak |first2=J. |last2=Mazur |first3=M.C. |last3=Granado |first4=Á. |last4=Örkenyi |last5=Zaborskis |first5=A. |last6=Aasvee |first6=K. |last7=Moreno |first7=C. |date=2012 |title=Examining trends in parent-child communication in Europe over 12 years |journal=The Journal of Early Adolescence |volume=32 |number=1 |pages=26–54 |doi=10.1177/0272431611419509 |s2cid=206496782 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Chevallier |first=Denis |url=http://terrain.revues.org/document2874.html |title=Famille et parenté: une bibliographie |journal=Terrain |issue=4 |pages=77–82 |language=fr |access-date=January 8, 2014 |doi=10.4000/terrain.2874 |year=1985 |doi-access=free |archive-date=July 24, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080724171236/http://terrain.revues.org/document2874.html |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Zeitzen |first=Miriam Koktvedgaard |year=2008 |title=Polygamy: a cross-cultural analysis |publisher=Berg |isbn=978-1-84520-220-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WIzHjpTJgdQC |access-date=2015-11-19}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Zinn |first1=Maxine Baca |last2=Eitzen |first2=D. Stanley |year=1987 |title=Diversity in American families}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{commons category}} | |||
* Family Organization | |||
{{wiktionary}} | |||
* Website of ] | |||
{{wikiquote|Family}} | |||
* - freely-edited family tree of all human beings. | |||
* {{cite EB1911|wstitle=Family |volume=10 |short=x}} | |||
* ''Online Dictionary of the Social Sciences'': http://bitbucket.icaap.org/ | |||
* ''Cousins'': http://www.tedpack.org/cousins.html | |||
* and Muslim Family | |||
* ''Grandparent Connection'': http://www.thegrandparentconnection.org | |||
* ''The Good Enough Family'': http://samvak.tripod.com/family.html | |||
* ''Cousin marriages'': http://www.cousincouples.com/ | |||
* ''Family Court'': http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/ | |||
* | |||
* ''Wiktionary entries for Western kinship terminology providing multilingual translations'' | |||
** ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
** ] ] ] ] | |||
** ] ] ] ] | |||
** ] | |||
{{Family}} | |||
{{Family rights}} | |||
{{Parenting}} | |||
{{Particular human rights}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
<!-- The below are interlanguage links. --> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 12 December 2024
Group of related people This article is about the group of related people. For the taxonomic rank, see Family (biology). For other uses, see Family (disambiguation). "Family life" and "Family member" redirect here. For other uses, see Family Life (disambiguation). For the song, see Family Member (song).
Part of a series on the | ||||||||
Anthropology of kinship | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basic concepts
|
||||||||
Terminology
|
||||||||
Case studies
|
||||||||
Major theorists | ||||||||
Related articles | ||||||||
Social anthropology Cultural anthropology | ||||||||
Family (from Latin: familia) is a group of people related either by consanguinity (by recognized birth) or affinity (by marriage or other relationship). It forms the basis for social order. Ideally, families offer predictability, structure, and safety as members mature and learn to participate in the community. Historically, most human societies use family as the primary purpose of attachment, nurturance, and socialization.
Anthropologists classify most family organizations as matrifocal (a mother and her children), patrifocal (a father and his children), conjugal (a married couple with children, also called the nuclear family), avuncular (a man, his sister, and her children), or extended (in addition to parents, spouse and children, may include grandparents, aunts, uncles, or cousins).
The field of genealogy aims to trace family lineages through history. The family is also an important economic unit studied in family economics. The word "families" can be used metaphorically to create more inclusive categories such as community, nationhood, and global village.
Social
One of the primary functions of the family involves providing a framework for the production and reproduction of persons biologically and socially. This can occur through the sharing of material substances (such as food); the giving and receiving of care and nurture (nurture kinship); jural rights and obligations; also moral and sentimental ties. Thus, one's experience of one's family shifts over time.
There are different perspectives of the term 'family', from the perspective of children, the family is a "family of orientation": the family serves to locate children socially and plays a major role in their enculturation and socialization. From the point of view of the parent(s), the family is a "family of procreation", the goal of which is to produce, enculturate and socialize children. However, producing children is not the only function of the family; in societies with a sexual division of labor, marriage, and the resulting relationship between two people, it is necessary for the formation of an economically productive household.
C. C. Harris notes that the western conception of a family is ambiguous and confused with the household, as revealed in the different contexts in which the word is used. Olivia Harris states this confusion is not accidental, but indicative of the familial ideology of capitalist, western countries that pass social legislation that insists members of a nuclear family should live together, and that those not so related should not live together. Despite the ideological and legal pressures, a large percentage of families do not conform to the ideal nuclear family type.
Size
Further information: Fertility factor (demography)The total fertility rate of women varies from country to country, from a high rate of 6.76 children born per woman in Niger to a low rate of 0.81 in Singapore (as of 2015). Fertility is below replacement in all Eastern European and Southern European countries, and particularly high in Sub-Saharan African countries.
In some cultures, the mother's preference of family size influences that of the children's through early adulthood. A parent's number of children strongly correlates with the number of children that their children will eventually have.
Types
Although early western cultural anthropologists and sociologists considered family and kinship to be universally associated with relations by "blood" (based on ideas common in their own cultures) later research has shown that many societies instead understand family through ideas of living together, the sharing of food (e.g. milk kinship) and sharing care and nurture. Sociologists have a special interest in the function and status of family forms in stratified (especially capitalist) societies.
According to the work of scholars Max Weber, Alan Macfarlane, Steven Ozment, Jack Goody and Peter Laslett, the huge transformation that led to modern marriage in Western democracies was "fueled by the religio-cultural value system provided by elements of Judaism, early Christianity, Roman Catholic canon law and the Protestant Reformation".
Much sociological, historical and anthropological research dedicates itself to the understanding of this variation, and of changes in the family that form over time. Levitan claims:
Times have changed; it is more acceptable and encouraged for mothers to work and fathers to spend more time at home with the children. The way roles are balanced between the parents will help children grow and learn valuable life lessons. There is great importance of communication and equality in families, in order to avoid role strain.
Multigenerational family
Historically, the most common family type was one in which grandparents, parents, and children lived together as a single unit. For example, the household might include the owners of a farm, one (or more) of their adult children, the adult child's spouse, and the adult child's own children (the owners' grandchildren). Members of the extended family are not included in this family group. Sometimes, "skipped" generation families, such as a grandparents living with their grandchildren, are included.
In the US, this arrangement declined after World War II, reaching a low point in 1980, when about one out of every eight people in the US lived in a multigenerational family. The numbers have risen since then, with one in five people in the US living in a multigenerational family as of 2016. The increasing popularity is partly driven by demographic changes and the economic shifts associated with the Boomerang Generation.
Multigenerational households are less common in Canada, where about 6% of people living in Canada were living in multigenerational families as of 2016, but the proportion of multigenerational households was increasing rapidly, driven by increasing numbers of Aboriginal families, immigrant families, and high housing costs in some regions.
Conjugal (nuclear) family
The term "nuclear family" is commonly used to refer to conjugal families. A "conjugal" family includes only the spouses and unmarried children who are not of age. Some sociologists distinguish between conjugal families (relatively independent of the kindred of the parents and of other families in general) and nuclear families (which maintain relatively close ties with their kindred).
Other family structures – with (for example) blended parents, single parents, and domestic partnerships – have begun to challenge the normality of the nuclear family.
Single-parent family
A single-parent family consists of one parent together with their children, where the parent is either widowed, divorced (and not remarried), or never married. The parent may have sole custody of the children, or separated parents may have a shared-parenting arrangement where the children divide their time (possibly equally) between two different single-parent families or between one single-parent family and one blended family. As compared to sole custody, physical, mental and social well-being of children may be improved by shared-parenting arrangements and by children having greater access to both parents. The number of single-parent families have been increasing due to the divorce rate climbing drastically during the years 1965–1995, and about half of all children in the United States will live in a single-parent family at some point before they reach the age of 18. Most single-parent families are headed by a mother, but the number of single-parent families headed by fathers is increasing.
Matrifocal family
Main article: Matrifocal familyA "matrifocal" family consists of a mother and her children. Generally, these children are her biological offspring, although adoption of children occurs in nearly every society. This kind of family occurs commonly where women have the resources to rear their children by themselves, or where men are more mobile than women. As a definition, "a family or domestic group is matrifocal when it is centred on a woman and her children. In this case, the father(s) of these children are intermittently present in the life of the group and occupy a secondary place. The children's mother is not necessarily the wife of one of the children's fathers." The name, matrifocal, was coined in Guiana but it is defined differently in other countries. For Nayar families, the family have the male as the "center" or the head of the family, either the step-father/father/brother, rather than the mother.
Extended family
The term "extended family" is also common, especially in the United States. This term has two distinct meanings:
- It serves as a synonym of "consanguineal family" (consanguine means "of the same blood").
- In societies dominated by the conjugal family, it refers to "kindred" (an egocentric network of relatives that extends beyond the domestic group) who do not belong to the conjugal family.
These types refer to ideal or normative structures found in particular societies. Any society will exhibit some variation in the actual composition and conception of families.
Historically, extended families were the basic family unit in the Catholic culture and countries (such as Southern Europe and Latin America), and in Asian, Middle Eastern and Eastern Orthodox countries.
Family of choice
The term family of choice, also sometimes referred to as "chosen family" or "found family", is common within the LGBT community, veterans, individuals who have suffered abuse, and those who have no contact with their biological parents. It refers to the group of people in an individual's life that satisfies the typical role of family as a support system. The term differentiates between the "family of origin" (the biological family or that in which people are raised) and those that actively assume that ideal role.
The family of choice may or may not include some or all of the members of the family of origin. This family is not one that follows the "normal" familial structure like having a father, a mother, and children. This is family as a group of people that rely on each other like a family of origin would. This terminology stems from the fact that many LGBT individuals, upon coming out, face rejection or shame from the families they were raised in. The term family of choice is also used by individuals in the 12 step communities, who create close-knit "family" ties through the recovery process.
As a family system, families of choice face unique issues. Without legal safeguards, families of choice may struggle when medical, educational or governmental institutions fail to recognize their legitimacy. If members of the chosen family have been disowned by their family of origin, they may experience surrogate grief, displacing anger, loss, or anxious attachment onto their new family.
Blended family
The term blended family or stepfamily describes families with mixed parents: one or both parents remarried, bringing children of the former family into the new family. Also in sociology, particularly in the works of social psychologist Michael Lamb, traditional family refers to "a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children," and nontraditional to exceptions to this rule. Most of the US households are now non-traditional under this definition. Critics of the term "traditional family" point out that in most cultures and at most times, the extended family model has been most common, not the nuclear family, though it has had a longer tradition in England than in other parts of Europe and Asia which contributed large numbers of immigrants to the Americas. The nuclear family became the most common form in the U.S. in the 1960s and 1970s.
In terms of communication patterns in families, there are a certain set of beliefs within the family that reflect how its members should communicate and interact. These family communication patterns arise from two underlying sets of beliefs. One being conversation orientation (the degree to which the importance of communication is valued) and two, conformity orientation (the degree to which families should emphasize similarities or differences regarding attitudes, beliefs, and values).
Blended families is complex, ranging from stepfamilies to cohabitating families (an individual living with guardians who are not married with step or half siblings). While it is not too different from stepfamilies, cohabiting families pose a prevalent psychological effect on youths. Some adolescents would be prone to "acts of delinquency," and experiencing problems in school ranging from a decrease in academic performance to increased problematic behavior. It coincides with other researches on the trajectories of stepfamilies where some experienced familyhood, but others lacking connection. Emotional detachment from members within stepfamilies contributes to this uncertainty, furthering the tension that these families may establish. The transition from an old family to a new family that falls under blended families would also become problematic as the activities that were once performed in the old family may not transfer well within the new family for adolescents.
Monogamous family
A monogamous family is based on a legal or social monogamy. In this case, an individual has only one (official) partner during their lifetime or at any one time (i.e. serial monogamy). This means that a person may not have several different legal spouses at the same time, as this is usually prohibited by bigamy laws, (the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another) in jurisdictions that require monogamous marriages.
Polygamous family
Polygamy is a marriage that includes more than two partners. When a man is married to more than one wife at a time, the relationship is called polygyny; and when a woman is married to more than one husband at a time, it is called polyandry. If a marriage includes multiple husbands and wives, it can be called polyamory, group or conjoint marriage.
Polygyny is a form of plural marriage, in which a man is allowed more than one wife. In modern countries that permit polygamy, polygyny is typically the only form permitted. Polygyny is practiced primarily (but not only) in parts of the Middle East and Africa; and is often associated with Islam, however, there are certain conditions in Islam that must be met to perform polygyny.
Polyandry is a form of marriage whereby a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time. Fraternal polyandry, where two or more brothers are married to the same wife, is a common form of polyandry. Polyandry was traditionally practiced in areas of the Himalayan mountains, among Tibetans in Nepal, in parts of China and in parts of northern India. Polyandry is most common in societies marked by high male mortality or where males will often be apart from the rest of the family for a considerable period of time.
Kinship terminology
Degrees of kinship
Main article: Coefficient of relationshipA first-degree relative is one who shares 50% of your DNA through direct inheritance, such as a full sibling, parent or progeny.
There is another measure for the degree of relationship, which is determined by counting up generations to the first common ancestor and back down to the target individual, which is used for various genealogical and legal purposes.
Kinship | Degree of relationship by coefficient |
Coefficient of relationship |
Degree of relationship by counting generations to common ancestor |
---|---|---|---|
identical twins | 0 | 100% | second-degree |
sister / brother | first-degree | 50% (2×2) | second-degree |
mother / father / daughter / son | first-degree | 50% (2) | first-degree |
half-sister / half-brother | second-degree | 25% (2) | second-degree |
grandmother / grandfather / granddaughter / grandson | second-degree | 25% (2) | second-degree |
aunt / uncle / niece / nephew | second-degree | 25% (2×2) | third-degree |
half-aunt / half-uncle / half-niece / half-nephew | third-degree | 12.5% (2) | third-degree |
first-cousin | third-degree | 12.5% (2×2) | fourth-degree |
half-first-cousin | fourth-degree | 6.25% (2) | fourth-degree |
great-grandmother / great-grandfather / great-granddaughter / great-grandson | third-degree | 12.5% (2) | third-degree |
first-cousin-once-removed | fourth-degree | 6.25% (2⋅2) | fifth-degree |
second-cousin | fifth-degree | 3.125% (2+2) | sixth-degree |
Terminologies
Main article: Kinship terminologyIn his book Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family, anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan (1818–1881) performed the first survey of kinship terminologies in use around the world. Although much of his work is now considered dated, he argued that kinship terminologies reflect different sets of distinctions. For example, most kinship terminologies distinguish between sexes (the difference between a brother and a sister) and between generations (the difference between a child and a parent). Moreover, he argued, kinship terminologies distinguish between relatives by blood and marriage (although recently some anthropologists have argued that many societies define kinship in terms other than "blood").
Morgan made a distinction between kinship systems that use classificatory terminology and those that use descriptive terminology. Classificatory systems are generally and erroneously understood to be those that "class together" with a single term relatives who actually do not have the same type of relationship to ego. (What defines "same type of relationship" under such definitions seems to be genealogical relationship. This is problematic given that any genealogical description, no matter how standardized, employs words originating in a folk understanding of kinship.) What Morgan's terminology actually differentiates are those (classificatory) kinship systems that do not distinguish lineal and collateral relationships and those (descriptive) kinship systems that do. Morgan, a lawyer, came to make this distinction in an effort to understand Seneca inheritance practices. A Seneca man's effects were inherited by his sisters' children rather than by his own children. Morgan identified six basic patterns of kinship terminologies:
- Hawaiian: only distinguishes relatives based upon sex and generation.
- Sudanese: no two relatives share the same term.
- Eskimo: in addition to distinguishing relatives based upon sex and generation, also distinguishes between lineal relatives and collateral relatives.
- Iroquois: in addition to sex and generation, also distinguishes between siblings of opposite sexes in the parental generation.
- Crow: a matrilineal system with some features of an Iroquois system, but with a "skewing" feature in which generation is "frozen" for some relatives.
- Omaha: like a Crow system but patrilineal.
Roles
"Grandson" redirects here. For other uses, see Grandson (disambiguation).Most Western societies employ Eskimo kinship terminology. This kinship terminology commonly occurs in societies with strong conjugal, where families have a degree of relative mobility. Typically, societies with conjugal families also favor neolocal residence; thus upon marriage, a person separates from the nuclear family of their childhood (family of orientation) and forms a new nuclear family (family of procreation). Such systems generally assume that the mother's husband is also the biological father. The system uses highly descriptive terms for the nuclear family and progressively more classificatory as the relatives become more and more collateral.
Nuclear family
Main article: Nuclear familyThe system emphasizes the nuclear family. Members of the nuclear family use highly descriptive kinship terms, identifying directly only the husband, wife, mother, father, son, daughter, brother, and sister. All other relatives are grouped together into categories. Members of the nuclear family may be lineal or collateral. Kin, for whom these are family, refer to them in descriptive terms that build on the terms used within the nuclear family or use the nuclear family term directly.
Nuclear family of orientation
- Brother: the male child of a parent.
- Sister: the female child of a parent.
- Father: a male parent.
- Grandfather: the father of a parent.
- Mother: a female parent.
- Grandmother: the mother of a parent.
Nuclear conjugal family
- Husband: a male spouse.
- Wife: a female spouse.
- Son: a male child of the subject.
- Grandson: a child's son.
- Daughter: a female child of the subject.
- Granddaughter: a child's daughter.
Nuclear non-lineal family
- Spouse: husband or wife
- Stepparent: a spouse of a parent that is not a biological parent
- Sibling: sister or brother
- Half-sibling: a sibling with whom the subject shares only one biological parent
- Step-sibling: a child of a parent that is not a biological parent
Collateral relatives
A sibling is a collateral relative with a minimal removal. For collateral relatives with one additional removal, one generation more distant from a common ancestor on one side, more classificatory terms come into play. These terms (Aunt, Uncle, Niece, and Nephew) do not build on the terms used within the nuclear family as most are not traditionally members of the household. These terms do not traditionally differentiate between a collateral relatives and a person married to a collateral relative (both collateral and aggregate). Collateral relatives with additional removals on each side are Cousins. This is the most classificatory term and can be distinguished by degrees of collaterality and by generation (removal).
When only the subject has the additional removal, the relative is the subject's parents' siblings, the terms Aunt and Uncle are used for female and male relatives respectively. When only the relative has the additional removal, the relative is the subjects siblings child, the terms Niece and Nephew are used for female and male relatives respectively. The spouse of a biological aunt or uncle is an aunt or uncle, and the nieces and nephews of a spouse are nieces and nephews. With further removal by the subject for aunts and uncles and by the relative for nieces and nephews the prefix "grand-" modifies these terms. With further removal the prefix becomes "great-grand-," adding another "great-" for each additional generation. For large numbers of generations a number can be substituted, for example, "fourth great-grandson", "four-greats grandson" or "four-times-great-grandson".
When the subject and the relative have an additional removal they are cousins. A cousin with minimal removal is a first cousin, i.e. the child of the subjects uncle or aunt. Degrees of collaterality and removals are used to more precisely describe the relationship between cousins. The degree is the number of generations subsequent to the common ancestor before a parent of one of the cousins is found, while the removal is the difference between the number of generations from each cousin to the common ancestor (the difference between the generations the cousins are from).
Cousins of an older generation (in other words, one's parents' first cousins), although technically first cousins once removed, are often classified with "aunts" and "uncles".
Aggregate relatives
English-speakers mark relationships by marriage (except for wife/husband) with the tag "-in-law". The mother and father of one's spouse become one's mother-in-law and father-in-law; the wife of one's son becomes one's daughter-in-law and the husband of one's daughter becomes one's son-in-law. The term "sister-in-law" refers to two essentially different relationships, either the wife of one's brother, or the sister of one's spouse. "Brother-in-law" is the husband of one's sister, or the brother of one's spouse. The terms "half-brother" and "half-sister" indicate siblings who share only one biological parent. The term "aunt-in-law" refers to the aunt of one's spouse. "Uncle-in-law" is the uncle of one's spouse. "Cousin-in-law" is the spouse of one's cousin, or the cousin of one's spouse. The term "niece-in-law" refers to the wife of one's nephew. "Nephew-in-law" is the husband of one's niece. The grandmother and grandfather of one's spouse become one's grandmother-in-law and grandfather-in-law; the wife of one's grandson becomes one's granddaughter-in-law and the husband of one's granddaughter becomes one's grandson-in-law.
In Indian English, a sibling in law who is the spouse of your sibling can be referred to as a co-sibling (specificity a co-sister or co-brother).
Types of kinship
Patrilineal
Patrilineality, also known as the male line or agnatic kinship, is a form of kinship system in which an individual's family membership derives from and is traced through his or her father's lineage. It generally involves the inheritance of property, rights, names, or titles by persons related through male kin.
A patriline ("father line") is a person's father, and additional ancestors that are traced only through males. One's patriline is thus a record of descent from a man in which the individuals in all intervening generations are male. In cultural anthropology, a patrilineage is a consanguineal male and female kinship group, each of whose members is descended from the common ancestor through male forebears.
Matrilineal
Matrilineality is a form of kinship system in which an individual's family membership derives from and is traced through his or her mother's lineage.
It may also correlate with a societal system in which each person is identified with their matriline—their mother's lineage—and which can involve the inheritance of property and titles. A matriline is a line of descent from a female ancestor to a descendant in which the individuals in all intervening generations are mothers – in other words, a "mother line".
In a matrilineal descent system, an individual is considered to belong to the same descent group as her or his mother. This matrilineal descent pattern is in contrast to the more common patrilineal descent pattern.
Bilateral descent
Bilateral descent is a form of kinship system in which an individual's family membership derives from and is traced through both the paternal and maternal sides. The relatives on the mother's side and father's side are equally important for emotional ties or for transfer of property or wealth. It is a family arrangement where descent and inheritance are passed equally through both parents. Families who use this system trace descent through both parents simultaneously and recognize multiple ancestors, but unlike with cognatic descent it is not used to form descent groups.
Traditionally, this is found among some groups in West Africa, India, Australia, Indonesia, Melanesia, Malaysia and Polynesia. Anthropologists believe that a tribal structure based on bilateral descent helps members live in extreme environments because it allows individuals to rely on two sets of families dispersed over a wide area.
History of theories
Main article: History of the familyEarly scholars of family history applied Darwin's biological theory of evolution in their theory of evolution of family systems. American anthropologist Lewis H. Morgan published Ancient Society in 1877 based on his theory of the three stages of human progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. Morgan's book was the "inspiration for Friedrich Engels' book" The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State published in 1884.
Engels expanded Morgan's hypothesis that economical factors caused the transformation of primitive community into a class-divided society. Engels' theory of resource control, and later that of Karl Marx, was used to explain the cause and effect of change in family structure and function. The popularity of this theory was largely unmatched until the 1980s, when other sociological theories, most notably structural functionalism, gained acceptance.
The nuclear family in industrial society
Contemporary society generally views the family as a haven from the world, supplying absolute fulfillment. Zinn and Eitzen discuss the image of the "family as haven ... a place of intimacy, love and trust where individuals may escape the competition of dehumanizing forces in modern society".
During industrialization, "he family as a repository of warmth and tenderness (embodied by the mother) stands in opposition to the competitive and aggressive world of commerce (embodied by the father). The family's task was to protect against the outside world." However, Zinn and Eitzen note, "The protective image of the family has waned in recent years as the ideals of family fulfillment have taken shape. Today, the family is more compensatory than protective. It supplies what is vitally needed but missing in other social arrangements."
Unhappily married couples are at 3–25 times the risk of developing clinical depression.
"The popular wisdom", according to Zinn and Eitzen, sees the family structures of the past as superior to those today, and families as more stable and happier at a time when they did not have to contend with problems such as illegitimate children and divorce. They respond to this, saying, "there is no golden age of the family gleaming at us in the far back historical past." "Desertion by spouses, illegitimate children, and other conditions that are considered characteristics of modern times existed in the past as well."
The postmodern family
Others argue that whether or not one views the family as "declining" depends on one's definition of "family". "Married couples have dropped below half of all American households. This drop is shocking from traditional forms of the family system. Only a fifth of households were following traditional ways of having married couples raising a family together." In the Western World, marriages are no longer arranged for economic, social or political gain, and children are no longer expected to contribute to family income. Instead, people choose mates based on love. This increased role of love indicates a societal shift toward favoring emotional fulfilment and relationships within a family, and this shift necessarily weakens the institution of the family.
Margaret Mead considers the family as a main safeguard to continuing human progress. Observing, "Human beings have learned, laboriously, to be human", she adds: "we hold our present form of humanity on trust, it is possible to lose it" ... "It is not without significance that the most successful large-scale abrogations of the family have occurred not among simple savages, living close to the subsistence edge, but among great nations and strong empires, the resources of which were ample, the populations huge, and the power almost unlimited"
Many countries (particularly Western) have, in recent years, changed their family laws in order to accommodate diverse family models. For instance, in the United Kingdom, in Scotland, the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 provides cohabitants with some limited rights. In 2010, Ireland enacted the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010. There have also been moves at an international level, most notably, the Council of Europe European Convention on the Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock which came into force in 1978. Countries which ratify it must ensure that children born outside marriage are provided with legal rights as stipulated in the text of this convention. The convention was ratified by the UK in 1981 and by Ireland in 1988.
In the United States, one in five mothers has children by different fathers; among mothers with two or more children the figure is higher, with 28% having children with at least two different men. Such families are more common among Blacks and Hispanics and among the lower socioeconomic class.
However, in western society, the single parent family has been growing more accepted and has begun to make an impact on culture. Single parent families are more commonly single mother families than single father. These families sometimes face difficult issues besides the fact that they have to rear their children on their own, for example, low income making it difficult to pay for rent, child care, and other necessities for a healthy and safe home.
Furthermore, there are families that consist of two mothers, two fathers, non-binary, trans, and queer folks raising children. This is made possible due to surrogacy, IVF, IUI, adoption, and other processes.
Domestic violence
Main article: Domestic violenceDomestic violence (DV) is violence that happens within the family. The legal and social understanding of the concept of DV differs by culture. The definition of the term "domestic violence" varies, depending on the context in which it is used. It may be defined differently in medical, legal, political or social contexts. The definitions have varied over time, and vary in different parts of the world.
The Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence states that:
"domestic violence" shall mean all acts of physical, sexual, psychological or economic violence that occur within the family or domestic unit or between former or current spouses or partners, whether or not the perpetrator shares or has shared the same residence with the victim.
In 1993, the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women identified domestic violence as one of three contexts in which violence against women occurs, describing it as:
Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including battering, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation.
Family violence
Family violence is a broader definition, often used to include child abuse, elder abuse, and other violent acts between family members.
Child abuse is defined by the WHO as:
Child maltreatment, sometimes referred to as child abuse and neglect, includes all forms of physical and emotional ill-treatment, sexual abuse, neglect, and exploitation that results in actual or potential harm to the child's health, development or dignity. Within this broad definition, five subtypes can be distinguished – physical abuse; sexual abuse; neglect and negligent treatment; emotional abuse; and exploitation.
There exists legislation to prevent and punish the occurrence of these offences. There are laws regarding familial sexual activity, which states that it is a criminal offence to have any kind of sexual relationship between one's grandparent, parent, sibling, aunt or uncle.
Elder abuse is, according to the WHO: "a single, or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust which causes harm or distress to an older person".
Parental abuse of children (child abuse)
See also: Adverse childhood experiences and Child abuseChild abuse is the physical, sexual or emotional maltreatment or neglect of a child or children. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department for Children and Families (DCF) define child maltreatment as any act or series of acts of commission or omission by a parent or other caregiver that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child. Child abuse can occur in a child's home, or in the organizations, schools or communities the child interacts with. There are four major categories of child abuse: neglect, physical abuse, psychological or emotional abuse, and sexual abuse.
Parental abuse by children
Main article: Parental abuse by childrenAbuse of parents by their children is a common but under reported and under-researched subject. A factor why this subject is under-researched is because of the overshadowing effect caused by parents abusing their children instead. Parents are quite often subject to levels of childhood aggression in excess of normal childhood aggressive outbursts, typically in the form of verbal or physical abuse. Parents feel a sense of shame and humiliation to have that problem, so they rarely seek help and it is usually little or no help available anyway.
Elder abuse
Main article: Elder abuseElder abuse is "a single, or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust, which causes harm or distress to an older person". This definition has been adopted by the World Health Organization from a definition put forward by Action on Elder Abuse in the UK. Laws protecting the elderly from abuse are similar to, and related to, laws protecting dependent adults from abuse.
The core element to the harm of elder abuse is the "expectation of trust" of the older person toward their abuser. Thus, it includes harms by people the older person knows or with whom they have a relationship, such as a spouse, partner or family member, a friend or neighbor, or people that the older person relies on for services. Many forms of elder abuse are recognized as types of domestic violence or family violence.
Forced and child marriage
Main articles: Forced marriage and Child marriageForced and child marriages are practiced in certain regions of the world, particularly in Asia and Africa, and these types of marriages are associated with a high rate of domestic violence.
A forced marriage is a marriage where one or both participants are married without their freely given consent. The line between forced marriage and consensual marriage may become blurred, because the social norms of many cultures dictate that one should never oppose the desire of one's parents/relatives in regard to the choice of a spouse; in such cultures it is not necessary for violence, threats, intimidation etc. to occur, the person simply "consents" to the marriage even if they do not want it, out of the implied social pressure and duty. The customs of bride price and dowry, that exist in parts of the world, can lead to buying and selling people into marriage.
A child marriage is a marriage where one or both spouses are under 18. Child marriage was common throughout history but is today condemned by international human rights organizations. Child marriages are often arranged between the families of the future bride and groom, sometimes as soon as the girl is born. Child marriages can also occur in the context of marriage by abduction.
The concept of family honour
Main article: Family honor Further information: Culture of honor and Honor killingFamily honor is an abstract concept involving the perceived quality of worthiness and respectability that affects the social standing and the self-evaluation of a group of related people, both corporately and individually. The family is viewed as the main source of honor and the community highly values the relationship between honor and the family. The conduct of family members reflects upon family honor and the way the family perceives itself, and is perceived by others. In cultures of honor maintaining the family honor is often perceived as more important than either individual freedom, or individual achievement. In extreme cases, engaging in acts that are deemed to tarnish the honor of the family results in honor killings. An honor killing is the homicide of a member of a family or social group by other members, due to the perpetrators' belief that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the family or community, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an arranged marriage, being in a relationship that is disapproved by their relatives, having sex outside marriage, becoming the victim of rape, dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate, or engaging in homosexual relations.
Economic issues
A family is often part of a sharing economy with common ownership.
Dowry, bride price and dower
Further information: Dowry, Bride price, and DowerDowry is property (money, goods, or estate) that a wife or wife's family gives to her husband when the wife and husband marry. Offering dowry was common in many cultures historically (including in Europe and North America), but this practice today is mostly restricted to some areas primarily in the Indian subcontinent.
Bride price, (also bride wealth or bride token), is property paid by the groom or his family to the parents of a woman upon the marriage of their daughter to the groom. It is practiced mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of South-East Asia (Thailand, Cambodia), and parts of Central Asia.
Dower is property given to the bride herself by the groom at the time of marriage, and which remains under her ownership and control.
Property regimes and taxation
In some countries married couples benefit from various taxation advantages not available to a single person or to unmarried couples. For example, spouses may be allowed to average their combined incomes. Some jurisdictions recognize common law marriage or de facto relations for this purposes. In some jurisdictions there is also an option of civil partnership or domestic partnership.
Different property regimes exist for spouses. In many countries, each marriage partner has the choice of keeping their property separate or combining properties. In the latter case, called community property, when the marriage ends by divorce each owns half. In lieu of a will or trust, property owned by the deceased generally is inherited by the surviving spouse.
Rights and laws
Family rights
The right to family is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 by the United Nations:
The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16.3
Georg Hegel's view of families as legal persons is reflected in the legal system of some countries.
Reproductive rights
Main article: Reproductive rights Further information: Forced sterilization, Forced pregnancy, and Forced abortionReproductive rights are legal rights and freedoms relating to reproduction and reproductive health. These include the right to decide on issues regarding the number of children born, family planning, contraception, and private life, free from coercion and discrimination; as well as the right to access health services and adequate information. According to UNFPA, reproductive rights "include the right to decide the number, timing and spacing of children, the right to voluntarily marry and establish a family, and the right to the highest attainable standard of health, among others". Family planning refers to the factors that may be considered by individuals and couples in order for them to control their fertility, anticipate and attain the desired number of children and the spacing and timing of their births.
The state and church have been, and still are in some countries, involved in controlling the size of families, often using coercive methods, such as bans on contraception or abortion (where the policy is a natalist one—for example through tax on childlessness) or conversely, discriminatory policies against large families (e.g., China's one-child policy in place from 1978 to 2015) or even forced abortions. Forced sterilization has often targeted ethnic minority groups, such as Roma women in Eastern Europe, or indigenous women in Peru (during the 1990s).
Parents' rights
The parents' rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues affecting parents and children related to family law, specifically parental rights and obligations. Mothers' rights movements focus on maternal health, workplace issues such as labor rights, breastfeeding, and rights in family law. The fathers' rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support, that affect fathers and their children.
Children's rights
Main article: Children's rightsChildren's rights are the human rights of children, with particular attention to the rights of special protection and care afforded to minors, including their right to association with both parents, their right to human identity, their right to be provided in regard to their other basic needs, and their right to be free from violence and abuse.
Marriage rights
Main article: Marriage lawEach jurisdiction has its own marriage laws. These laws differ significantly from country to country; and these laws are often controversial. Areas of controversy include women's rights as well as same-sex marriage.
Legal reforms
Gender equality
Legal reforms to family laws have taken place in many countries during the past few decades. These dealt primarily with gender equality within marriage and with divorce laws. Women have been given equal rights in marriage in many countries, reversing older family laws based on the dominant legal role of the husband. Coverture, which was enshrined in the common law of England and the US for several centuries and throughout most of the 19th century, was abolished. In some European countries the changes that lead to gender equality were slower. The period of 1975–1979 saw a major overhaul of family laws in countries such as Italy, Spain, Austria, West Germany, and Portugal. In 1978, the Council of Europe passed the Resolution (78) 37 on equality of spouses in civil law. Among the last European countries to establish full gender equality in marriage were Switzerland. In 1985, a referendum guaranteed women legal equality with men within marriage. The new reforms came into force in January 1988. In Greece, in 1983, legislation was passed guaranteeing equality between spouses, abolishing dowry, and ending legal discrimination against illegitimate children. In 1981, Spain abolished the requirement that married women must have their husbands' permission to initiate judicial proceedings the Netherlands, and France in the 1980s. In recent decades, the marital power has also been abolished in African countries that had this doctrine, but many African countries that were former French colonies still have discriminatory laws in their marriages regulations, such regulations originating in the Napoleonic Code that has inspired these laws.
Divorce
In some countries (predominantly Roman Catholic) divorce was legalized only recently (e.g. Italy (1970), Portugal (1975), Brazil (1977), Spain (1981), Argentina (1987), Ireland (1996), Chile (2004) and Malta (2011)) although annulment and legal separation were options. The Philippines still does not allow divorce. (see Divorce law by country). The laws pertaining to the situation of children born outside marriage have also been revised in many countries (see Legitimacy (family law)).
Health
Family medicine
Main article: Family medicineFamily medicine is a medical specialty devoted to comprehensive health care for people of all ages; it is based on knowledge of the patient in the context of the family and the community, emphasizing disease prevention and health promotion. The importance of family medicine is being increasingly recognized.
Maternal mortality
Main article: Maternal mortalityMaternal mortality or maternal death is defined by WHO as "the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes." Historically, maternal mortality was a major cause of women's death. In recent decades, advances in healthcare have resulted in rates of maternal mortality having dropped dramatically, especially in Western countries. Maternal mortality however remains a serious problem in many African and Asian counties.
Infant and child mortality
Main articles: Infant mortality and Child mortalityInfant mortality is the death of a child less than one year of age. Child mortality is the death of a child before the child's fifth birthday. Like maternal mortality, infant and child mortality were common throughout history, but have decreased significantly in modern times.
Politics
While in many parts of the world family policies seek to promote a gender-equal organization of the family life, in others the male-dominated family continues to be the official policy of the authorities, which is also supported by law. For instance, the Civil Code of Iran states at Article 1105: "In relations between husband and wife; the position of the head of the family is the exclusive right of the husband".
In some parts of the world, some governments promote a specific form of family, such as that based on traditional family values. The term "family values" is often used in political discourse in some countries, its general meaning being that of traditional or cultural values that pertain to the family's structure, function, roles, beliefs, attitudes, and ideals, usually involving the "traditional family"—a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family". These family ideals are often advanced through policies such as marriage promotion. Some jurisdictions outlaw practices which they deem as socially or religiously unacceptable, such as fornication, cohabitation or adultery.
Work–family balance
Further information: Work–family balance in the United StatesWork–family balance is a concept involving proper prioritizing between work/career and family life. It includes issues relating to the way how work and families intersect and influence each other. At a political level, it is reflected through policies such maternity leave and paternity leave. Since the 1950s, social scientists as well as feminists have increasingly criticized gendered arrangements of work and care, and the male breadwinner role, and policies are increasingly targeting men as fathers, as a tool of changing gender relations.
Protection of private and family life
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence", subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society".
Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedom of others.
Criticism
The Russian-American rationalist and individualist philosopher, novelist and playwright Ayn Rand compared partiality towards consanguinity with racism, as a small-scale manifestation of the latter. "The worship of the family is merely racism, like a crudely primitive first installment on the worship of the tribe. It places the accident of birth above a man's values and duty to the tribe above a man's right to his own life." Additionally, she spoke in favor of childfree lifestyle, while following it herself.
The family and social justice
One of the controversies regarding the family is the application of the concept of social justice to the private sphere of family relations, in particular with regard to the rights of women and children. Throughout much of the history, most philosophers who advocated for social justice focused on the public political arena, not on the family structures; with the family often being seen as a separate entity which needed to be protected from outside state intrusion. One notable exception was John Stuart Mill, who, in his work The Subjection of Women, advocated for greater rights for women within marriage and family. Second wave feminists argued that the personal is political, stating that there are strong connections between personal experiences and the larger social and political structures. In the context of the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s, this was a challenge to the nuclear family and family values, as they were understood then. Feminists focused on domestic violence, arguing that the reluctance—in law or in practice—of the state to intervene and offer protection to women who have been abused within the family, is in violation of women's human rights, and is the result of an ideology which places family relations outside the conceptual framework of human rights.
Global trends in family composition
Statistics from an infographic by Olivier Ballou showed that,
In 2013, just over 40% of US babies were born outside marriage. The Census bureau estimated that 27% of all children lived in a fatherless home. Europe has seen a surge in child-free adults. One in five 40-something women are childless in Sweden and in Switzerland, in Italy one in four, in Berlin one in three. So-called traditional societies are seeing the same trend. About one-sixth of Japanese women in their forties have never married and about 30% of all women that age are childless.
— Infographic Olivier Ballou (AEI)
However, Swedish statisticians reported in 2013 that, in contrast to many countries, since the 2000s, fewer children have experienced their parents' separation, childlessness had decreased in Sweden and marriages had increased. It had also become more common for couples to have a third child suggesting that the nuclear family was no longer in decline in Sweden.
See also
- Childlessness
- Familialism
- Family economics
- Household
- Nepotism
- Parent
- Stepfamily
- Voluntary childlessness
Notes
- Although married women in France obtained the right to work without their husbands' permission in 1965, and the paternal authority of a man over his family was ended in 1970 (before that parental responsibilities belonged solely to the father who made all legal decisions concerning the children), it was only in 1985 that a legal reform abolished the stipulation that the husband had the sole power to administer the children's property.
References
Citations
- Brown, Roy I.; Brown, Ivan (2014). "Family Quality of Life". Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 2194–2201. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1006. ISBN 978-94-007-0752-8.
family is recognized in cultures around the world and across history as a fundamental unit of social order.
- Donald Collins; Catheleen Jordan; Heather Coleman (2010). An Introduction to Family Social Work. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. pp. 28–29. ISBN 978-0-495-80872-5. Archived from the original on 2020-07-31. Retrieved 2019-08-13.
- Alhussain, Khalid, Shah, Drishti, Thornton, James, Kelly, Kimberly. Familial Opioid Misuse and Family Cohesion: Impact on Family Communication and Well-being. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment 2019;18(4):194–204. doi:10.1097/ADT.0000000000000165.
- Lander L, Howsare J, Byrne M. The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Soc Work Public Health. 2013;28:194–205.
- Manzi, Claudia; Brambilla, Maria (2014). "Family Connectedness". Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 2167–2168. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_998. ISBN 978-94-007-0752-8.
Family connectedness is defined as a particular characteristic of the family bond, also referred as family or parental closeness, support, warmth, or responsiveness. This characteristic of the family can be observed when families maintain emotional connections with each other through encouragement of shared family celebrations, family rituals, and family traditions.
- de Jong, D.C.; Reis, H.T. (2016). "Love and Intimacy". Encyclopedia of Mental Health. Elsevier. pp. 25–32. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397045-9.00107-5. ISBN 9780123977533.
Central to intimacy is responsiveness, the process by which relationship partners attend to and respond supportively to each other's wishes, needs, and concerns. Responsive interactions begin when one person discloses a core aspect of his or her self.
- Jás Elsner (2007). "The Changing Nature of Roman Art and the Art Historical Problem of Style," in Eva R. Hoffman (ed), Late Antique and Medieval Art of the Medieval World, 11–18. Oxford, Malden & Carlton: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-2071-5, p. 17, Figure 1.3 on p. 18.
- ^ Schneider, David 1984 A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 182
- Deleuze-Guattari (1972). Part 2, ch. 3, p. 80
- Russon, John, (2003) Human Experience: Philosophy, Neurosis, and the Elements of Everyday Life, Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. 61–68.
- George Peter Murdoch Social Structure p. 13
- Wolf, Eric. 1982 Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press. 92
- Harner, Michael 1975 "Scarcity, the Factors of Production, and Social Evolution," in Population, Ecology, and Social Evolution, Steven Polgar, ed. Mouton Publishers: The Hague.
- Rivière, Peter 1987 "Of Women, Men, and Manioc", Etnologiska Studier (38).
- "We have seen that people can refer to their relatives as 'the family'. 'All the family turned up for the funeral... But of course, my brother didn't bring his family along— they're much too young.' Here the reference is to the offspring (as distinct from 'all' the family). The neighbors were very good, too. 'The Jones came, and their two children. It was nice, the whole family turning up like that.' Here the usage is more restricted than 'relatives' or 'his relatives,' but includes just both parents and offspring. 'Of course, the children will be leaving home soon. It's always sad to see the family break up like that.' Here the reference is not only to parents and children but to their co-residence, that is, to the household." The Family and Industrial Society", 1983, George Allen Unwin, London, p. 30
- Harris, Olivia. Young, Kate; Wolkowitz, Carol; McCullagh, Roslyn (eds.). Of Marriage and the Market: Women's Subordination Internationally and its Lessons. London: Routeledge. p. 138.
- ^ "The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency". Cia.gov. Archived from the original on 28 October 2009. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Axinn, William G.; Clarkberg, Marin E.; Thornton, Arland (1994). "Family Influences on Family Size Preferences". Demography. 31 (1): 65–79. doi:10.2307/2061908. ISSN 0070-3370. JSTOR 2061908. PMID 8005343. S2CID 7787872.
- Murphy, Michael (2013). "Cross-National Patterns of Intergenerational Continuities in Childbearing in Developed Countries". Biodemography and Social Biology. 59 (2): 101–126. doi:10.1080/19485565.2013.833779. ISSN 1948-5565. PMC 4160295. PMID 24215254.
- Little, William (2014-11-06). "Chapter 1. An Introduction to Sociology". Archived from the original on 2022-07-15. Retrieved 2022-07-15.
- "The Collapse of Marriage by Don Browning – The Christian Century". Religion-online.org. February 7, 2006. pp. 24–28. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-10.
- Levitan, Sara (2010). "Working wives and mothers: what happens to family life?" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on August 19, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
- ^ "The Return of the Multi-Generational Family Household". Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. 2010-03-18. Archived from the original on 2021-02-28. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
- "Record 64 million Americans live in multigenerational households". Pew Research Center. 2018-04-05. Archived from the original on 2021-02-21. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
- "The Daily — Families, households and marital status: Key results from the 2016 Census". Statistics Canada. 2017-08-02. Archived from the original on 2021-04-15. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
- Smith, Court. "Definitions of Anthropological Terms". Oregonstate.edu. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Compare: Scott, John, ed. (2014). A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford paperback reference (4 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-19-968358-1. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2018-06-30.
The conjugal family refers to a family system of spouses and their dependent children. The term nuclear family is used to refer to a unit consisting of spouses and their dependent children.
- Compare: Lee, Gary R. (1999). "4: Comparative Perspectives". In Sussman, Marvin B.; Steinmetz, Suzanne K.; Peterson, Gary W. (eds.). Handbook of Marriage and the Family (2 ed.). New York: Springer Science & Business Media (published 2013). p. 96. ISBN 978-1-4757-5367-7. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2018-06-30.
the nuclear family (consisting of parents and dependent children) the conjugal family (defined as nuclear in structure) .
- "Fewer than half of U.S. kids today live in a 'traditional' family". Pewresearch.org. 22 December 2014. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Staff writers (March 2014). "The Kids will be alright, even without the Nuclear Family". Pacific Standard magazine. Archived from the original on 30 July 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
- Bryant, L.E. (March 2016). "Nuclear Families". Encyclopedia of Family Studies. pp. 1–3. doi:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs490. ISBN 978-0-470-65845-1.
- Dowd, Nancy E. (1997). In Defence of Single Parent Families. New York and London: New York University Press. ISBN 0-8147-1869-8. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- Sanford L. Braver and Michael E. Lamb, Shared Parenting After Parental Separation: The Views of 12 Experts, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, April 2018: "The empirical evidence currently available supports the view that children of divorce, on average, benefit substantially from SP arrangements in which they live with each parent at least 35% of the time. Findings from well over 50 individual studies indicate that children whose parents have SP fare better than those with sole physical custody ."
- Baude, Amandine; Pearson, Jessica; Drapeau, Sylvie (27 June 2016). "Child Adjustment in Joint Physical Custody Versus Sole Custody: A Meta-Analytic Review". Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 57 (5): 338–360. doi:10.1080/10502556.2016.1185203. S2CID 147782279.
- American Psychological Association, Single parenting and today's family Archived 2019-01-30 at the Wayback Machine
- Kathryn M. Feltey, Single-Parent Families Archived 2019-01-31 at the Wayback Machine, International Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family
- ^ Randolph, Richard R. (1964). "The "Matrifocal Family" as a Comparative Category". American Anthropologist. 66 (3): 628–631. doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00130. ISSN 0002-7294. JSTOR 668860.
- Godelier, Maurice, trans. Nora Scott, The Metamorphoses of Kinship (London: Verso, 2011 (ISBN 978-1-84467-746-7)), p. 568 (Glossary, entry matrifocal) (trans. from Métamorphoses de la parenté (Librarie Arthème Fayard (apparently), 2004)) (author prof. anthropology, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris).
- Little, William (2014-11-06). Chapter 4. Society and Social Interaction. Archived from the original on 2022-05-21. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
- ^ Pritchard, Colin Pritchard (2006). Mental Health Social Work: Evidence-Based Practice. Routledge. p. 111. ISBN 978-1134365449.
in cultures with stronger 'extended family traditions', such as Asian and Catholic countries
- "ALGBTICAL LGBT Glossary of Terminology". ALGBTICAL Association for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Issues in Counseling of Alabama. 2005–2006. Archived from the original on May 6, 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2016.
- Dewaele, Alexis; Cox, Nele; Van den Berghe, Wim; Vincke, John (February 2011). "Families of Choice? Exploring the Supportive Networks of Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals1: FAMILIES OF CHOICE". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 41 (2): 312–331. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00715.x. Archived from the original on 2022-05-04. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
- ^ Stitt, Alex (2020). ACT For Gender Identity: The Comprehensive Guide. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. pp. 372–376. ISBN 978-1785927997. OCLC 1089850112.
- Blended and Blessed Archived 2017-11-04 at the Wayback Machine – Encouraging Step-Families, blendedandblessed.com
- "Department of Social and Developmental Psychology: PPSIS Faculty, Academic Profile". Sdp.cam.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2011-11-25. Retrieved 2011-03-26.
- Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-10309 Archived 2010-12-25 at the Wayback Machine paragraph 17
- "Parenting Myths And Facts". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-13. Retrieved 2018-05-14.
- see History of the family § Evolution of household
- "The Evolution of American Family Structure". Concordia University, St. Paul Online. 2015-06-23. Archived from the original on 2021-06-10. Retrieved 2021-06-10.
- McCornack, Steven (2010). Reflect & Relate an introduction to interpersonal communication. Boston/NY: Bedford/St. Martin's. pp. 369–370.
- Portrie, Torey; Hill, Nicole R. (October 2005). "Blended Families: A Critical Review of the Current Research". The Family Journal. 13 (4): 445–451. doi:10.1177/1066480705279014. ISSN 1066-4807. S2CID 32353012. Archived from the original on 2022-05-04. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
- Braithwaite, Dawn; Olson, Loreen; Golish, Tamara; Soukup, Charles; Turman, Paul (2001-01-01). ""Becoming a family": developmental processes represented in blended family discourse". Journal of Applied Communication Research. 29 (3): 221–247. doi:10.1080/00909880128112. ISSN 0090-9882. S2CID 14220043.
- Braithwaite, Dawn O.; Baxter, Leslie A.; Harper, Anneliese M. (1998-06-01). "The role of rituals in the management of the dialectical tension of "old" and "new" in blended families". Communication Studies. 49 (2): 101–120. doi:10.1080/10510979809368523. ISSN 1051-0974. Archived from the original on 2022-07-30. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
- Cf. "Monogamy" in Britannica World Language Dictionary, R.C. Preble (ed.), Oxford-London 1962, p. 1275:1. The practice or principle of marrying only once. opp. to digamy now rare 2. The condition, rule or custom of being married to only one person at a time (opp. to polygamy or bigamy) 1708. 3. Zool. The habit of living in pairs, or having only one mate; The same text repeats The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, W. Little, H.W. Fowler, J. Coulson (ed.), C.T. Onions (rev. ed.) Oxford 1969, 3rd edition, vol. 1, p. 1275; OED Online. March 2010. Oxford University Press. 23 Jun. 2010 Cf. Monogamy Archived 2015-06-23 at the Wayback Machine in Merriam-Webster Dictionary
- "bigamy". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.
- "Opening Up: Challenging Myths about Consensual Non-Monogamy". Scienceofrelationships.com. 2012-08-17. Archived from the original on 2017-04-04. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- ^ Zeitzen (2008), p. 3.
- McCullough, Derek; Hall, David S. (February 27, 2003). "Polyamory – What it is and what it isn't". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 6. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2015.
- Zeitzen (2008), p. 9.
- "Polygamy | Polygyny, Polyandry & Group Marriage – Video & Lesson Transcript". study.com. Archived from the original on 2022-07-30. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
- ^ Starkweather, Katherine E.; Hames, Raymond (June 2012). "A survey of non-classical polyandry". Human Nature. 23 (2): 149–172. doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x. PMID 22688804. S2CID 2008559. Archived from the original on 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2018-11-14.
- "Family". hy.w3we.com (in Armenian). Archived from the original on 2022-07-18. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
- By replacement in the definition of the notion of "generation" by meiosis". Since identical twins are not separated by meiosis, there are no "generations" between them, hence n=0 and r=1. See genetic-genealogy.co.uk Archived 2021-02-24 at the Wayback Machine.
- "Kin Selection". Benjamin/Cummings. Archived from the original on 2015-05-17. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
- Tooker, Elisabeth. "Another View of Morgan on Kinship." Archived 2018-09-22 at the Wayback Machine Current Anthropology 20, no. 1 (March 1979): 131–134.
- "Systematic Kinship Terminologies". www.umanitoba.ca. Archived from the original on 2019-12-24. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
- A Dictionary of Genetics. Oxford University Press. 2013. 8.
- "Definition of Cousin". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2021-02-01. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
- "Co-Sister". Cambridge Dictionary. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
- "Co-Brother". Cambridge Dictionary. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
- Benokraitis, N.V. Marriages and Families. 7th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., 2011
- Shepard, Jon; Greene, Robert W. (2003). Sociology and You. Ohio: Glencoe McGraw-Hill. p. A-22. ISBN 978-0-07-828576-9. Archived from the original on 2010-03-08.
- Stone, Linda (2006). Kinship and Gender: An Introduction. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. pp. 168–169. ISBN 978-0-8133-4302-0.
- Ezzell, Carol (June 2001). "The Himba and the Dam". Scientific American. 284 (6): 80–90. Bibcode:2001SciAm.284f..80E. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0601-80. PMID 11396346. Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2015-07-12.
- "Sociology/Founding the discipline". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 2009-12-23. Retrieved 2009-07-26.
- "Ancient Society by Lewis H. Morgan 1877".
- "Cultural Anthropology". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 2009-08-15. Retrieved 2009-07-22.
- "The Marxists Internet Archive". Archived from the original on 2006-04-25. Retrieved 2009-07-17.
- Williams, Brian; Sawyer, Stacey C.; Wahlstrom, Carl M. (2005). Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships. Boston, MA: Pearson. 0-205-36674-0.
- Zinn, Maxine Baca; Eitzen, D. Stanley (2002). Diversity in families (6 ed.). Allyn and Bacon. p. 557. ISBN 978-0-205-33522-0. Archived from the original on 2013-03-29. Retrieved 2012-01-06.
This 'family as haven' image of a refuge from an impersonal world characterizes the family as a place of intimacy, love, and trust in which individuals may escape the competition of dehumanizing forces in modern society. Christopher Lasch (1977:8) has named this image a 'haven in a heartless world' and described it as a glorification of private life made necessary by the deprivations experienced in the public world.
- ^ Zinn & Eitzen (1987), p. 3.
- Tatiana D. Gray; Matt Hawrilenko; James V. Cordova (2019). "Randomized Controlled Trial of the Marriage Checkup: Depression Outcomes" (PDF).
- Fink, Brandi C.; Shapiro, Alyson F. (March 2013). "Coping Mediates the Association Between Marital Instability and Depression, but Not Marital Satisfaction and Depression". Couple & Family Psychology. 2 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1037/a0031763. ISSN 2160-4096. PMC 4096140. PMID 25032063.
- Maria R. Goldfarb; Gilles Trudel (2019). "Marital quality and depression: a review". Marriage & Family Review. 55 (8): 737–763. doi:10.1080/01494929.2019.1610136. S2CID 165116052.
- ^ Zinn & Eitzen (1987), p. 8.
- "Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States". CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. May 13, 2009. Archived from the original on September 6, 2011. Retrieved September 24, 2011.
- Tavernise, Sabrina (2011). "Married Couples Are No Longer a Majority, Census Finds". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 25, 2014. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
- "The Family Revolution". Greater Good. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
- Coontz, Stephanie. 2005. Marriage, A History: How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Viking/Penguin Books.
- Male and Female, New York, 1949. pp. 193–194
- "Family Matters – Couples – Cohabitation". Scotland.gov.uk. Scottish Government, Edinburgh. 27 April 2006. Archived from the original on 24 October 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Full list". Coe.int. Archived from the original on 2 October 2000. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Full list". Coe.int. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "1 in 5 US moms have kids with multiple dads, study says". Nbcnews.com. 1 April 2011. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "American Children's Family Structure: Single-Parent Families". Bowling Green State University. Archived from the original on 2021-06-20. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
- "Definitions of Domestic Violence – Child Welfare Information Gateway". Childwelfare.gov. Archived from the original on 15 December 2014. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "Full list". Coe.int. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "A/RES/48/104. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women". United Nations. 20 December 1993. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- Wallace, Harvey (2004). Family Violence: Legal, Medical, and Social Perspectives. Allyn & Bacon. p. 2. ISBN 0-205-41822-8.
- "Child maltreatment". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Roffee, James A. (2015). "When Yes Actually Means Yes". Rape Justice. pp. 72–91. doi:10.1057/9781137476159_5. ISBN 978-1-137-47615-9.
- Roffee, J. A. (2014). "No Consensus on Incest? Criminalisation and Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights" (PDF). Human Rights Law Review. 14 (3): 541–572. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu023. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-10-30. Retrieved 2018-10-30.
- "Elder abuse". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on October 26, 2007. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "Child abuse – definition of child abuse by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia". Thefreedictionary.com. Archived from the original on 9 June 2019. Retrieved 15 September 2010.
- Leeb, R.T.; Paulozzi, L.J.; Melanson, C.; Simon, T.R.; Arias, I. (1 January 2008). "Child Maltreatment Surveillance: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Archived from the original on 16 October 2008. Retrieved 20 October 2008.
- "Parenting and Family Support – Family Lives (Parentline Plus)". Parentlineplus.org.uk. Archived from the original on 21 December 2010. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "WHEN FAMILY LIFE HURTS: Family experience of aggression in children – Parentline plus 31 October 2010" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 19, 2012.
- elderabus.org.uk Archived 2019-08-20 at the Wayback Machine, accessed October 12, 2007.
- ^ "Q & A: Child Marriage and Violations of Girls' Rights". Human Rights Watch. 14 June 2013. Archived from the original on 20 June 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- ^ "Child marriages: 39,000 every day". WHO. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
- ^ "Article 16: Right to marriage and family and to equal rights of men and women during and after marriage". I have a right to. BBC World Service. Archived from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
- "Early and forced marriage – facts, figures and what you can do". Plan International UK. Archived from the original on March 12, 2014.
- "Ethics – Forced Marriages: Introduction". Bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 3 September 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Ethics – Slavery: Modern slavery". Bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 6 January 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Gulnara Shahinian. "Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences" (PDF). Ohchr.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "Child marriage". UNICEF. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Factsheet: Child Marriage" (PDF). GirlUp. United Nations Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2014-07-20.
- Malina, Bruce J. (2001). The New Testament world: insights from cultural anthropology. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-664-22295-6. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
- ^ Mosquera, Patricia M.R.; Manstead, Antony S.R.; Fischer, Agneta H. (January 2002). "Honor in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 33 (1): 16–36. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1006.591. doi:10.1177/0022022102033001002. S2CID 55174724. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- Berns, Roberta (2007). Child, family, school, community: socialization and support. Thompson Learning. p. 139. ISBN 978-0-495-00758-6. Archived from the original on 2021-04-15. Retrieved 2020-10-31.
- McGoldrick, Monica; Giordano, Joseph; Garcia-Preto, Nydia (2005). Ethnicity and family therapy. Guilford Press. p. 445. ISBN 978-1-59385-020-3. Archived from the original on 16 March 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2011.
- "Ethics: Honour Crimes". BBC. 1 January 1970. Archived from the original on 19 June 2014. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- "Honor killing: Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary". Merriam-webster.com. 31 August 2012. Archived from the original on 22 December 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- "Honor killing definition". Dictionary.reference.com. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- "Shocking gay honor killing inspires movie". Edition.cnn.com. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
- "Iraqi immigrant convicted in Arizona 'honor killing' awaits sentence". Edition.cnn.com. 23 February 2011. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
- "Definition of DOWRY". Merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Goody, Jack (1976). Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 8.
- Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich (25 October 1991). Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of Right:. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808012. ISBN 978-0-521-34438-8.
- Carney, Michael; Gedajlovic, Eric; Strike, Vanessa M. (2014). "Dead Money: Inheritance Law and the Longevity of Family Firms". Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 38 (6): 1261–1283. doi:10.1111/etap.12123. ISSN 1042-2587.
- "Gender, equity, human rights". Who.int. Archived from the original on August 29, 2003. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "State of World Population 2005". UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund. Archived from the original on 1 March 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "WHO – Gender and human rights". Who.int. Archived from the original on 23 December 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Get Involved". Amnesty.org. Archived from the original on 17 January 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Supporting the Constellation of Reproductive Rights". UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund. Archived from the original on 30 July 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Family planning". Who.int. Archived from the original on 18 March 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Family planning". UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Forced/Coerced Sterilization". Stopvaw.org. Archived from the original on 13 December 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Czech regret over sterilisation". BBC News. 2009-11-24. Archived from the original on 2018-10-13. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Cabitza, Mattia (6 December 2011). "Peru women fight for justice over forced sterilisation". BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Collier & Sheldon (2006), pp. 1–26.
- "Protecting children's rights". UNICEF. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "Children's Rights". Hrw.org. Archived from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Children and human rights". Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 19 February 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "The Policy on Gender Equality in Italy" (PDF). Europarl.europa.eu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Rashida Manjoo. "Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences" (PDF). Ohchr.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Solsten, Eric; Meditz, Sandra W., eds. (1988). "Social Values and Attitudes". Spain: A Country Study. Washington: Government Printing Office for the Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 2011-05-20. Retrieved 2016-02-26.
- Contemporary Western European Feminism, by Gisela Kaplan, p. 133
- Reconciliation Policy in Germany 1998–2008, Construing the 'Problem' of the Incompatibility of Paid Employment and Care Work, by Cornelius Grebe; p. 92: "However, the 1977 reform of marriage and family law by Social Democrats and Liberals formally gave women the right to take up employment without their spouses' permission. This marked the legal end of the 'housewife marriage' and a transition to the ideal of 'marriage in partnership'." Archived 2017-04-16 at the Wayback Machine
- Further reforms to parental rights law in 1979 gave equal legal rights to the mother and the father. Comparative Law: Historical Development of the Civil Law Tradition in Europe, Latin America, and East Asia, by John Henry Merryman, David Scott Clark, John Owen Haley, p. 542
- Women in Portugal, by Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General Information, p. 32
- "On Equality of Spouses in Civil Law" (PDF). Wcd.coe.int. Archived from the original on 21 January 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "Switzerland profile". Bbc.com. 24 July 2017. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "The Long Way to Women's Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology". History-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch. Archived from the original on 21 November 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Women's movements of the world: an international directory and reference guide, edited by Sally Shreir, p. 254
- "AROUND THE WORLD; Greece Approves Family Law Changes". The New York Times. 23 October 1983. Archived from the original on 16 June 2012. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Demos, Vasilikie. (2007) "The Intersection of Gender, Class and Nationality and the Agency of Kytherian Greek Women." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. August 11
- ^ International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (2013). "Women, Business and the Law 2014: Removing Restrictions to Enhance Gender Equality" (PDF). London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-24. Retrieved 2014-08-25.
- "Dutch gender and LGBT-equality policy : 2013 – 2016" (PDF). Rm.coe.int. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "2015 Review Report of the Netherlands Government in the context of the twentieth anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women and the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action" (PDF). Unece.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "Virtual Special Issue: Modern & Contemporary France: Women in France" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- Ferrand, Frédérique. "National Report: France" (PDF). Commission on European Family Law. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-08-11. Retrieved 2016-02-26.
- Country Comparison: Maternal Mortality Rate Archived 2015-04-18 at the Wayback Machine in The CIA World Factbook.
- "What is Family Medicine?". Uchicago.edu – Department of Family Medicine. Archived from the original on 7 May 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "The rising importance of family medicine". Who.int. Archived from the original on March 7, 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Infant Mortality Rates in 2012 Archived July 14, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, UNICEF, 2013.
- ^ "Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)". Who.int. Archived from the original on May 7, 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Maternal mortality". Who.int. Archived from the original on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Infant mortality". Who.int. Archived from the original on March 24, 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "Children: reducing mortality". Who.int. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "The Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran" (PDF). 11 March 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 March 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- N, Panasenko (2013). "Czech and Slovak Family Patterns and Family Values in Historical, Social and Cultural Context". Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 44 (1): 79–98. doi:10.3138/jcfs.44.1.79.
- Bjørnholt, M. (2014). "Changing men, changing times; fathers and sons from an experimental gender equality study" (PDF). The Sociological Review. 62 (2): 295–315. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12156. S2CID 143048732. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-10-21. Retrieved 2014-09-11.
- "Art. 8 ECHR Right to private life – Introduction". ECHR online. Archived from the original on 2014-10-21. Retrieved 2014-10-20.
- ^ Heller, Anne C. (2009). Ayn Rand and the World She Made. New York: Doubleday. pp. 320–321. ISBN 978-0-385-51399-9. OCLC 2290274371. Said in one of the lectures Archived 2015-07-03 at the Wayback Machine Ayn Rand delivered.
- Said in one of the public lectures Archived 2015-07-03 at the Wayback Machine Ayn Rand delivered
- Satz, Debra (1 January 2017). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 18 March 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2017 – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Angela Harutyunyan, Kathrin Hörschelmann, Malcolm Miles (2009) Public Spheres After Socialism pp. 50–51 Archived 2022-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
- Patel, Vibhuti. "Domestic Violence: A Violation of Human Rights of Women by Dr. Vibhuti Patel, Director, P.G.S.R." Academia.edu. Archived from the original on 17 April 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- Nicholas Eberstadt (February 23, 2015). The global flight from the family. Washington: American Enterprise Institute. Archived from the original on September 8, 2015. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
keywords Economic Development, Foreign and Defense Policy, International Economics, Infographic by Olivier Ballou global trends in family composition
- Tollebrant, Johan; Persson, Lotta (October 2013). Assumptions on future fertility: New family values and increased childbearing in Sweden? (PDF) (Report). Joint Eurostat/UNECE Work Session on Demographic Projections. Rome, Italy: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 28, 2017. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
Sources
- Race, Class, & Gender: An Anthology, 9th edition. Editors: Margaret L. Anderson and Patricia Hill Collins. Cengage Learning.
Bibliography
- Collier, Richard; Sheldon, Sally, eds. (2006). Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective. Hart Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84113-629-5.
- Monica McGoldrick; Nydia A. Garcia Preto; Betty A. Carter (2015). The Expanding Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives. Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0-205-96806-0. Archived from the original on 17 February 2017. Retrieved 15 February 2017.
- Daly, Mary (2011). "What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective". Social Politics. 18 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1093/sp/jxr002. PMID 21692242. S2CID 21306624.
- Daly, Mary; Lewis, Jane (2000). "The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states". British Journal of Sociology. 51 (2): 281–98. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x. PMID 10905001. Archived from the original on 2019-06-29. Retrieved 2019-06-25.
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women's new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Ferragina, Emanuele; Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (2015). "Determinants of a Silent (R)evolution:Understanding the Expansion of Family Policy in Rich OECD Countries". Social Politics. 22 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1093/sp/jxu027.
- Forbes, Scott, A Natural History of Families, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), ISBN 0-691-09482-9
- Foucault, Michel (1978). The History of Sexuality: Volume I: An Introduction. (New York: Vintage Books). ISBN 978-0-679-72469-8
- Gilroy, Paul "Identity Belonging and the Critique of Pure Sameness" in Gilroy, Paul (2000) Against Race: Imagining Political Culture Beyond the Color Line, (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press), Ch. I.3, pp. 97–133
- Goody, Jack The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe Archived 2016-05-19 at the Wayback Machine (Cambridge University Press, 1980); translated into Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese.
- Mock, Douglas W., More Than Kin and Less Than Kind, (Belknap Press, 2004), ISBN 0-674-01285-2
- Schneider, David M., American Kinship: a cultural approach (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).
- Tabak, I.; Mazur, J.; Granado, M.C.; Örkenyi, Á.; Zaborskis, A.; Aasvee, K.; Moreno, C. (2012). "Examining trends in parent-child communication in Europe over 12 years". The Journal of Early Adolescence. 32 (1): 26–54. doi:10.1177/0272431611419509. S2CID 206496782.
- Chevallier, Denis (1985). "Famille et parenté: une bibliographie". Terrain (in French) (4): 77–82. doi:10.4000/terrain.2874. Archived from the original on July 24, 2008. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
- Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: a cross-cultural analysis. Berg. ISBN 978-1-84520-220-0. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
- Zinn, Maxine Baca; Eitzen, D. Stanley (1987). Diversity in American families. p. 3 p. 8
External links
- "Family" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). 1911.
Family | |||
---|---|---|---|
First-degree relatives | |||
Second-degree relatives | |||
Third-degree relatives | |||
Family-in-law | |||
Stepfamily | |||
Kinship terminology | |||
Genealogy and lineage |
| ||
Relationships | |||
Holidays | |||
Related |
Family rights | |
---|---|
Elements | |
Rights movements | |
See also | |
Related |