| Revision as of 08:54, 4 November 2013 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots669,655 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:56, 26 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Black Kite/Archive 97) (bot |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 30K |
|
|counter = 48 |
|
|counter = 97 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|algo = old(48h) |
|
|algo = old(48h) |
|
|archive = User talk:Black Kite/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = User talk:Black Kite/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:Black Kite/Nav}} |
|
|
{{ombox |
|
{{ombox |
|
|
|text = ''"And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth."'' <small>]</small> |
|
| type = content |
|
|
|
}} |
|
| text = '''This user may only be available sporadically due to real life. If you have an urgent issue it may be better to contact another administrator.''' |
|
|
|
{{tmbox |
|
|
|text = <big>'''Black Kite'''</big><br>Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on. |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{ombox |
|
|
|text = For Talk Page '''Archives''', click ].''' |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{ombox |
|
|
|text = '''If you email me''' via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not ''that'' regularly. |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
<br> |
|
|
|
|
|
== AFD closure query == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Happy Holidays == |
|
Hi mate! I wanted to query closure with you. From my perspective, the delete/merge !votes were almost entirely "per previous AFDs", most of which were based on ], which no longer applies. Both the nom (who also !voted in addition to his nomination) and the "per nom" contribution immediately after the AFD opened were seemingly unaware of the subsequent DRV. Both had this drawn to their attention; neither responded. Then there was the "delete" contribution on the basis of a lack of sources which even the "merge" crowd agreed wasn't the case (and hasn't been the case since the first AFD). There were fairly strong policy-based arguments from the "keep crowd" (dismissing BLP1E, highlighting sources) and arguments refuting the various "per previous" arguments from SPA IPs (which have a history of showing up at previous AFDs) - none were willing/able to come back and make a solid case. I'm inclined to take this back to DRV to ''re-endorse'' the previous decision there to allow recreation on the basis that BLP1E no longer applies, thus all of the "per previous" !votes were entirely weightless. ]] 03:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
* I don't take any notice of any previous AFD or DRV when closing deletion discussions. The problem I had in closing as "keep" was not only numeric, though, as some of the keep votes were simply of the format "]". ] (]) 08:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:*Sure, fair enough, but if you ignored previous AFDs and the majority of ''delete'' contributions were "per previous AFD" (including the nomination), I can't see we could then arrive at a consensus to delete. I'm suggesting "no consensus" was the most obvious result, with no consensus to either keep or delete in particular. That said (and though I appreciate you've said you didn't take previous discussions into account) there ''was'' a previous (recent) DRV discussion where consensus wasn't exactly ambiguous - it was qualitatively and quantitatively in favour of allowing recreation on the basis that BLP1E no longer applied. The alternative is that I just go and recreate the article on the basis that the concerns raised at AFD no longer apply (given they actually didn't apply ''before'' the AFD) and per the DRV that permitted recreation. That, of course, would effectively mean reverting your closure. So I'm stuck. ]] 14:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" |
|
==Disambiguation link notification for November 4== |
|
|
|
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | |
|
|
---- |
|
|
'''Hello Black Kite, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> |
|
|
] (]) 23:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' |
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|} ] (]) 23:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Deletion review for ] == |
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 14:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
